HomeMy WebLinkAboutBURNS ANNEXATION AND ZONING - 23 90, A - CORRESPONDENCE - OTHER WATER AND OR SANITATION DISTRICTS (3)Start of Item 39. 0 ® 1 w"
Message.
Subject: ITEM 8
Sender: Rich SHANNON / CFC52/01
CC: Tom PETERSON / CFC52/01
Part 1.
FROM: Rich SHANNON / CFC52/01
TO: DISTRIBUTION
Part 2.
Dated: 02/15/91 at 1720.
Contents: 2.
I WOULD LIKE TO OFFER A COUPLE OF THOUGHTS REGARDING THE
BURNS ANNEXATION. THEY MAY NOT BE NEEDED IF THE ITEM IS
GOING TO BE CONTINUED AGAIN. BUT JUST IN CASE...
1.I THINK COUNCIL HAS GOTTEN THE LETTER AND PACKET FROM
JUDY ALLEY. IT INCLUDED THE ENGINEERING PROPOSAL GIVEN
TO THE FORT COLLINS LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT.
2. THE PROPOSAL SUGGESTS THE CREATION OF A G.I.D. TO
PAY FOR THE COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE OPERATION
AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED SYSTEM.
3. SHE STATES THAT SHE THINKS THIS IS "FAIR TO ALL PARTIES
INVOLVED".
THE WATER UTILITY HAS SOME MAJOR RESERVATIONS ABOUT ANY GID FOR
THIS PURPOSE. THIS ISSUE OF FUNDING IMPROVEMENTS, HOWEVER, IS NOT
NECESSARILY RELEVANT TO THE ANNEXATION QUESTION.
THUS OUR PRIMARY CONCERN IS THAT IF THE ANNEXATION STAYS ON
THE AGENDA AND IF IT GETS PASSED....... THAT IT BE CLEAR THAT
WE ARE NOT ALSO GIVING INFORMAL APROVAL OF THE CREATION OF
A GID.
THANKS FOR LISTENING.