HomeMy WebLinkAboutWONDERLAND PRESCHOOL AND CHILD CARE CENTER PUD PRELIMINARY AND FINAL - 26 90 - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES
July 23, 1990
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at 6:30
p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins,
Colorado. Board members present included: Chairman Jim Klataske, Bernie Strom,
Jan Cottier, Laurie O'Dell, Lloyd Walker, and Joe Carroll.
Staff members present included Joe Frank, Ted Shepard, Paul Eckman, Sherry
Albertson -Clark, Steve Olt, Kerrie Ashbeck, Kirsten Whetstone and Georgiana Taylor.
Board Members present at the July 20, 1990 worksession included: Chairman Jim
Klataske, Bernie Strom, Laurie O'Dell, Joe Carroll, and Jan Cottier. Members absent
included Lloyd Walker.
AGENDA REVIEW
Assistant Planning Director Joe Frank reviewed the Consent and Discussion Agenda.
The Consent Agenda included: Item 2 - Martin Luther Home Adolescent Facility -
Group Home, #24-87A; Item 3 - Wonderland Preschool and Child Care Center PUD -
Preliminary and Final, #26-90; Item 4 - Split Rail Manor Group Home PUD -
Preliminary & Final, *27-90; Item 5 - One Prospect PUD - Final, #17-90; Item 6 -
The Market at Horsetooth Commons PUD, Lot 2 - Amended Final, *96-81N.
Member Strom moved to approve consent agenda Items 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Member
O'Dell seconded the motion. Motion was approved 7-0.
R H - li n #
. Member Carroll declared a conflict of Interest on the project and would not be
participating In the discussion or vote.
Sherry Albertson -Clark gave the staff report recommending approval.
Member Walker asked when the landscape goes in if there would be any
communication between the two sites, there was no gate or driveway shown.
Ms. Clark replied that at her request, the applicant had talked about locating two
gates in the fenced area so they could have cross access. Staff did not have a
problem with them crossing from lot to lot across the street. They view it the same
as a person having a driveway backing onto a local street. They felt the cross
traffic from lot to lot would be minimal and create minimal traffic impacts.
Lucia Liley, from the law firm of March and Myatt, representing the applicant,
asked the chairman to consider the opportunity, not only to them but to the
opponents, to do a brief rebuttal.
Chairman Klataske granted the request.
Ms. Liiey stated that the project had been turned down in March by the Board on a
5-2 vote.
Ms. Liley stated that the Board's previous concerns were drainage of fluid from
vehicles on the site, the Magnolia Street fencing and the set back and how that was
• going to work, the ability to require future improvementf, drainage and flooding
questions that had come up by some of the neighborhood residents, crushing of
vehicles on the site and the noise that would go along with it, confusion over legal
and illegal auto salvage uses and compatibility with the neighborhood especially the