Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPLIT RAIL MANOR GROUP HOME PUD PRELIMINARY AND FINAL - 27 90 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSITEM NO. 4 MEETING DATE 7 23 90 City of Fort Coffins Pff-11MIG AID Z0A11G GI• • 1 STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Split Rail Manor PUD- Preliminary and Final, #27-90 APPLICANT: Mr. and Mrs. Paul Boone 1109 Greenbriar Drive Fort Collins, CO 80524 OWNER: same PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A request for preliminary and final PUD approval for the Split Rail Manor personal care group home for fifteen elderly residents in an existing 7,684 square foot residence/shop, on Lot 1 of Milfred. Acres. The site contains 32,126 square feet (about .74 acres) and is located on the west side of Taft Hill Road south of Drake Road, at 3223 S. Taft Hill Road. The site is zoned R-L, Low Density Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicants are proposing to convert a large duplex residence with an attached shop to a board and care group home for 15 elderly residents on approximately .74 acres. There are no major exterior changes proposed for the site with the exception of additional windows and closing off of one of the two driveways on Taft Hill Road. The applicants intend to reside at the site as primary care providers. The proposed project meets the All Development Criteria of the LDGS and is compatible with surrounding land uses. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 300 LaPorte Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Split Rail Manor PUTT- Preliminary and Final, #27-90 • July 23, 1990 P & Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS 1. Backeround: The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: FA-1; county; existing single family residence and church S: FA-l; county; vacant E: R-L-P; existing single family residences and fire station W: FA-1; county; existing single family residences The proposed project is located on Lot one of Milfred Acres Subdivision, which was developed in the county in 1964. Lot one was annexed to the City of Fort Collins as the Spruce Homes Annexation in December of 1985 with the intention of converting the structure to a group home. The existing structure has been used in the past as a residence and automobile repair shop, as a duplex and shop, and as a residence with an attached shop/warehouse for a heating and plumbing business. This request to convert the existing structure to a residence and group home has been submitted and processed as a Planned Unit Development, because the present Group Home Ordinance permits a maximum of 8 residents in the R-L zone. Based on the lot size (32,126 square feet), a maximum of 8 residents would be permitted under the current Group Home Ordinance (three plus 1 additional per 1500 square feet of lot area up to a maximum of eight). The Land Development Guidance System is a valid process to use in seeking group home approval under current City Codes. 2. Land Use: The LDGS treats group homes as a residential use; however, since the Residential Density Chart is applicable only to calculating residential density (number of dwelling units per acre), the point chart was not used to evaluate this proposal. As previously indicated, the request to convert the existing structure to a group home requires PUD approval, since the R-L Zoning District limits the maximum number of residents to 8. The proposal meets all applicable criteria of the All Development Criteria Chart. The structure proposed to be used for the group home is consistent and compatible with the general physical character of the neighborhood and is of similar size and scale as the surrounding area. Across Taft Hill to the east is a fire station and single family homes, to the north is a church of similar size and scale as the proposed group home, and to the west are single family homes. The proposed group home is on a large lot and is residential in character with landscaped grassy areas, walks, and residential scale entrances. The proposed primary care providers, Mr. and Mrs. Paul Boone, will be the owners/operators of the proposed group home. The Boones currently own and operate the Split Rail Manor group home located at 2320 W. Prospect Road and the Split Rail Manor group home located at 1109 Greenbriar Drive in Fort Collins. The applicants intend to close down at least one of these existing Split Rail Manor PUP Preliminary and Final, #27-90 • July 23, 1990 P & Z Meeting Page 3 homes and take up residence at the Split Rail Manor on Taft Hill Road. They anticipate the possibility of a maximum of one additional employee depending on the number of clients. This additional staff person would not reside at the site. Including the owners, there would be a maximum of three employees at the site at any one time. Residents of the group home would be limited to residents 50 years of age or older, as referenced by a note on the site plan, unless the condition of a resident younger than 50 is such that they require the kind of care provided by this type of personal care boarding home. 3. Neighborhood Compatibility: The proposed group home is compatible with the neighborhood in both its residential character and its intended land use. A neighborhood meeting was held on May 30, 1990 at the Rocky Mountain High School Band Room. Five residents from the neighborhood attended the meeting. The neighbors expressed concerns about the lack of sidewalks on Taft Hill and whether the residents would be safe walking about. They also had questions about whether the residents would be in wheelchairs. The applicants responded that the residents are accompanied by supervisors when on walks. Some residents may be in wheelchairs, others are assisted with walkers. The neighbors also expressed concerns that the noise they create in their own backyards, such as from lawn mowers, would disturb the group home residents. Common courtesy should prevail in neighborhoods for any occupants, be they elderly residents, college students, single people or families. Other concerns were whether the PUD was transferrable if the property were ever sold and whether the property was on a septic system and what the impacts of additional bathrooms would be on that system. The County Health Department would require the applicant to hook up to the City's sanitary sewer located in Taft Hill Road, if the existing system were to fail. The residents attending the meeting expressed that there were no problems with the proposed land use, but were concerned that the property be well maintained and the board and care facility be operated professionally without impacting the neighborhood. 4. Design: The large warehouse/shop will be remodeled on the interior to accommodate several additional bedrooms. There are minor exterior changes proposed with this request. Several windows are proposed to be added to the west side of the structure and one or two additional windows are being proposed for the east side. The existing residence is split level with a portion of it having a second story. This portion will be used by the Boones as a private residence. The site is presently landscaped, with a mixture of street trees and shrubbery. There are nine parking spaces on the site not including two spaces in the garage. Parking is more than adequate for staff and visitors to the site, as the residents do not drive. No additional paving is proposed for the existing driveways or parking areas. Split Rail Manor July 23, 1990 P Page 4 PUPI Preliminary Z Meeting and Final, #27-90 • The applicant has not designed a specific sign for this site but has indicated that the sign would be a free standing sign located on the site visible from Taft Hill Road. The sign would be of natural wood, 3 to 4 feet high, with painted graphics and letters. Any lighting would be from a small down directed goose neck type of lamp. The planning department would have the opportunity, during the administrative change to a PUD process, to review the eventual design to ensure that any signage at the site is residential in character and size and is compatible with the neighborhood. Access for the group home will be off of Primrose Lane. The private residence will take access off of Taft Hill Road. There are currently two curb cuts on Taft Hill Road. The City Transportation Director has requested that the northern most curb cut be blocked off from use by the group home, although the private residence may still use this access if they desire. The applicant is proposing to block this access with a chain link gate. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the request for preliminary and final PUD approval for Split Rail Manor group home for 15 residents meets the applicable criteria of the All Development Chart of the Land Development Guidance System. Staff finds the proposed land use and the size and scale of the structure compatible with the surrounding area. Staff also finds that the proposed use would not create additional impacts in the neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends approval of Split Rail Manor PUD, Preliminary and Final, #27-90. a 119El df r _9wnf- I, c PRINRO5E LANE LINK GATE %UE%_` :D OWNER CERTIFICATION REEK: E ME DIDER901E0. 6,9ic ME ufru DYERE Ug19: DS fY MAN Ew MEY 4tE ;REEK ES IRnEBT [dY�DMA�i A[ayt ME [p1p19)IS AND fEymcnoxs E5 ARE aJ pdttx Isl UKI STE rlAx. Y_ ING eV TA I� XF IN- ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION PLANNING AND ZONING f DAs1iFD tws Is ro anw* nut m 112— CERTIFICATION 6 DAY _. X90o, I EXAYIYL ME nna ro ME rXar xn s DEs Rx m 9rX1wm DY HE qAw we AND z xa c HOE GN AID ESL<BIlA1FD t1Ui RE Cf TE C( f%t CLLLINS fL N pWatS ND PRCPPE1g15 s R w R YINY ""YY AS CYNStwJEO w CX.S. 1911 St-33-Itt. ME SxUY11fAE0! XS M 3 ms (,CLgtA00. PI TYS_WY mw i CE SAD sEDiTARY 6 el.XWtllc f zamc wAAn AWREm XE LID_ um r .•Y.n< on.. roa mun.. m Dszt Wr w19Motryl:roi MIG<nU: ty«m 1 e1 �bn<rt!b• ItDM 11 r<rtwN.ln W I<ayel<• nwxPi a �av<fy <� 1. tM E�pn 4111n w o.. wi is b IYU wwr w rW.IY b Ixlq m w prwlw. a.Inimrnt vtb< 1«lY<rlwly ypmlynlr ss <nwU Y 3231 SmW LNt Xlll Y.. W (YI twt tM I<btls: ux w W11CIy <n Ib<I M m ry1MU YO evn<1<b. 1'bmm<1 w< bbefM M1m< <uy b mn. sp111 wll Wv. br.n lysm. m.letltlb ti u w 4.n .11tll). w w mt _ IA Is. M MIv u 1�W.0 NY W 4fy <t MUlle. �t1 ApnL1y. YmWNslp IemIM ^r wllUHob. k em <I IeIU q mt vU11Y 111 i tllq •n k<t Yb< We4 fd e«<<Mlyfy W. M1m1Y MctmwmgWwYlN wtw rorw 1< wt tlellR Il) <UspNN V tl tfb. IM; Y <i wlb . mlt am< Iplt11Y. iw<. NH<.1Y b Iln 1. fw11YOVt s<I.®t N b p<w n.< wir 9Y110 Y I1M1. )otUyw. Syll[ Wn Wv. 4tm4 b w b 4a<t m w ylhwrVJ. W !<n ALAI yleUl b! NY <UYbb ul m1.W W i.11 iM 41b Y uv Im. W <1S1 Iellw Y< <w! plb m r! Xlll b<G. rtl 1<U qYl<w I.r�mm<Im n 4at mw. em<°`�`ki. ow `almimtt e< w Mttl clb tofu[ nm. bNw y11 IaX rswN m •ntlty m sv 00 W cw p b fwl (ne U UL <q q.<tlm W b eut ye• N9tt bn. Il:c✓<U. P-d &. AWao. LAND USE: 150' ROJUS AW VD a0g .Iq S 1 °v c x cokl T 0 I E�=] R G T N A R Yi�rE T I Y _ Inn eua i i cAD VACANT f'Z'fl :stRBcvT<u u i SCALE: I •100 ass sryq:RED ame �. �u� etlyM Nll r r m..�.n nm•. <a� -I Is .<.nbelrC<�f N u \•�. v�N<ylpmm y � .•c.\mN <I<y�^l lwl r NW+.M a w� Y. n «rve! ^Ill rfY•<\e Il<. y.l nu<r m. n>.. N q\• b4:ry<M Uw e) F. � .cI< Mltl 4rMtl bwW �f\• N N• •v1M W M\m •« xiu Iw yy� N Ml. .gw�riiWw N!� .111 .w•lr. <..ultlry Imo .vr� l w \rctew.fy we _ ..w� so r Nf<fy<• . .N...e�w oi.,:^l.'.Xl•�a�^I i u�:<.inn <.mN i : n i re c—er h 4 v.y yt' nl oe tn_ ' . f�} lire ,E/it/i/ OIOi/ ..YMflel tYYI MILL r MYY e. W. 1 soul ttxo L/[t w. rL ifll• aUILnima WYUADE )111 \. f avufc • IunerAY r,r. 39 uwsucE ages 19 OPEM tPA[[ Ie1t1 t) IDe AuaElnD zobw x ENKA �ADxAE—a 9 SofEOf a TOTAL f WMfi<�t�.� <®, f•-y��w•,•w� �••<�m Y <M iYr! W p1 <�q N•r 4tLe. Wb Y�<Y Ytl w M-Y-Y• Split Rail Manor W2 3 s. i11 xlll ft Eon came, Can BOSTe P.U.D. No Text • CAl/TQAJI MAnA)^LD ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED CRITERIA CHARTGrl.,jAL- ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY CRITERION Is the criterion opplicoble7 Will the Criterion be satisfied? If no, please explain sy W00�,.�' .��0 Yes No NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY 1. Social Computability 2. Neighborhood Character 3. Land Use Conflicts 4. Adverse Traffic Impact �( PLANS AND POLICIES 5. Comprehensive Plan PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY 6. Street Capacity X 7. Utility Capacity 8, Design Standards X >< 9. Emergency Access >( K X 10. Security Lighting ( X 11 Water Hazards y RESOURCE PROTECTION 12. Soils & Slope Hazard 13. Significant Vegetation 14. Wildlife Habitat 15. Historical Landmark X 16. Mineral Deposit 17. Eco-Sensitive Areas 18. Agricultural Lands X ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS 19. Air Quality X X 20. Water Quality X 21. Noise ) 22. Glare & Heat X 23. Vibrations 24. Exterior Lighting }(iK 25. Sewages & Wastes 1( SITE DESIGN 26. Community Organization 27. Site Organization 28. Natural Features X 29. Energy Conservation 30,Shadows X 31. Solar Access 32, Privacy X 33. Open Space Arrangement x 34. Building Height 35. Vehicular Movement X X 36. Vehicular Design 37, Parking 38. Active Recreational Areas 39. Private Outdoor Areas 40. Pedestrian Convenience x1( X 41, Pedestrian Conflicts x 42. LandscapinglOpen Areas 43. Landscaping/Buildings X 44 Landscaping/Screening 45. Public Access 46 SianS MA 0 • Susan Hayes Storm Water Engineer Storm Water Utilities 235 Mathews Ft.Collins, Colo. 80524 Concerning PUD 27-90: 1109 Greenbriar Dr. Fort Collins, Colo. 80524 23 July 1990 As the potential developer of PUD 27-90, otherwise to be known as Split Rail Manor, I, Abram P. Boone, will not be changing the drainage pattern or the impervious surface of this site at 3223 S. Taft Hill Rd. as it exists on this day, the 23rd of July 1990. Abram P. Boone