Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSATURN OF FORT COLLINS PUD REFERRAL OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGE - 34 90A - LEGAL DOCS - APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL (2)City Attoey City of Fort Collins Lucia Liley, Esq. March & Myatt, P.C. 110 East Oak Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 Re: Saturn of Fort Collins, P.U.D. Dear Lucia: March 17, 1995 This is in response to your letter of March 16, 1995. I appreciate your interest in trying to streamline the proceedings at the hearing by resolving in advance as many evidentiary issues as possible. As you probably know, however, the City Code provides in Section 2-56(a) that it is the Mayor, upon the advice of the City Attorney, who must determine the admissibility of all evidence at the hearing on appeal. That determination may be overturned by a majority vote of the members of the Council present at the hearing. Therefore, it is impossible for me to reach an agreement with you about the admissibility of evidence. However, I can advise you that Steve Olt, the City planner assigned to this project, has no objection to the Council's receipt.of the evidence referred to in your letter. (I do question whether the LDGS guidelines really constitute evidence; instead, they would appear to be part of the Code provision which Council will be called upon to interpret.) Even'mi light of Steve's position with regard to the admissibility question, I think we will have to wait until the hearing to see whether either the Mayor or any of the Councmembers have any objection to receiving the evidence in question. Very truly yours, l / �� Stephen J. Roy City Attorney SJR: meg cc: Paul Eckman, Deputy City Attorney Steve Olt, City Planner 300 LaPorte Avenue • P. O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6520