HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIMBERLINE ANNEXATION AND ZONING - 40 91, A - CORRESPONDENCE - CITY COUNCILWDesk Local Print for Tom PETERSON
Start of Item 1.
Message. Dated: 01 / 19/93 at 1702.
Subject: Hunting on Annexed Property
Sender: Wendy MEYER / CFC/01 Contents: 2.
TO: Tom PETERSON / CFC52/01
Part 1
FROM: Steve ROY / CFC/01
TO: DISTRIBUTION
Part 2.
CONFIDENTIAL
This is in response to an inquiry from Chris Kneeland about a
statement in the agenda item summary of the Timberline item. The
statement is that the question of hunting on annexed property would
be better addressed on a City-wide basis rather than through
individual annexation agreements.
This approach to the hunting issue has been recommended by both the
City Attorney's office and Police Services. The reasons for the
recommendation are:
The City Code prohibits the discharge of weapons
(including firearms) within the City, except: (a) if a
permit is granted by the Police Chief, or (b) the
discharge is part of a class of a school or university or
at a firing range. Therefore, from a legal standpoint,
the City lacks the authority under the existing Code
provisions to enter into an annexation agreement which
would permit the discharge of firearms unless the Police
Chief were to issue a permit to the property owner.
2. The Police Chief is reluctant to issue firearm permits to
particular property owners because: (a) the fact that a
property has been recently annexed may or may not address
the kinds of safety concerns that would have to be
considered in issuing a permit, and (b) for enforcement
purposes, it would be very difficult for officers to know
whether particular properties have been exempted from the
Code prohibition against the discharge of firearms.
3. If exceptions are to be created to this prohibition, the
Council should address the issue on a City-wide basis and
determine, as a matter of policy, the kinds of
circumstances which would justify exempting particular
properties. Again, from a legal perspective, there would
3
need to be some criteria related to legitimate municipal
purposes which would provide a rational basis for
differentiating among various property owners, and these
criteria would need to be consistently applied to avoid
equal protection problems.
SJR:whm
End of Item 1.