Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAMIGOS AT SHIELDS FINAL PUD - 47 90B - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES• PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING 1VIINUTES March 22, 1993 Gerry Horak, Council Liaison Tom Peterson, Staff Support Liaison The February 22, 1993 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board was called to order at 6:35 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Board members present included: Vice Chair Joe Carroll, Jan Cottier, Laurie O'Dell, Bernie Strom, and Jim Klataske. Member Clements -Cooney joined the meeting at 6:35 p.m. Staff members present included: Planning Director Tom Peterson, Deputy City Attorney Paul Eckman, Ted Shepard, Sherry Albertson -Clark, Mike Herzig, Kerrie Ashbeck, Kirsten Whetstone, Steve Ott, Kayla Ballard and Heidi Phelps. Identification of citizen participants may be from verbal statements and not necessarily correct, since some participants did not sign in as requested. AGENDA REVIEW Tom Peterson reviewed the Consent Agenda. The Consent Agenda included: Item 1 - Minutes • of the March 22, 1993 meeting; Item 2 - Amigos at Shield PUD - Final, #47-90B; Item 3 - Burns Ranch at Quail Ridge, Amended, RF Site Plan Review and 2nd Filing - Final, #23-90D; Item 4 - Paragon Point PUD, Phase III - Final, #48-91F; Item 5 - Sandcreek Village Subdivision - Final, #1-84E; Item 7 - Amigos at Arbor Plaza PUD - PreIiminary, #137-80G; Item 8 - Centre for Advanced Technology PUD, New Mercer Commons - Final, #53-85AD; Item 9 - Upper Meadows at Miramont PUD, Second Filing - Final, #54-87I; Item 10 - PZ93-4 Easement Vacation; Item 11 - The Gateway at Harmony Road PUD - One Year Extension of Final Approval, #1-88C; Item 12 - North Lemay Plaza PUD - One Year Extension of Final Approval, #57-87B; Item 13 - Modifications of Conditions of Final Approval for Eight Projects; Item 14 - Manion Annexation and Zoning, #5-93, and; Item 15 - Amendment to Chapter 2 of the City Code, # 17-93. Mr. Peterson reviewed the Discussion Agenda. The Discussion Agenda included: Item 16 - ShopKo PUD - PreIiminary, #1-93; Item 17 - Impala Village PUD - Preliminary, #6-93; Item 18-Oakridge PUD, Block One - Preliminary, #13-82BB, and; Oakridge PUD, Block One, 1st Filing - Final, #13-82BC. Vice Chair Carroll noted that Mr. Peterson had requested that Item 2 of the Consent Agenda be pulled. Vice Chair Carroll asked if staff had any other items to pull from the Consent Agenda. 0 Mr. Peterson said they did not. P & Z Minutes March 29, 1993 Pa.-e 2 Vice Chair Carroll asked if the Board had any items to pull from the Consent Agenda. There was no response. Vice Chair Carroll asked if the public wanted any items pulled from the Consent Agenda. Ellen Kelly, 806 Bramblebush Lane, requested that Consent Item 5 be pulled. Tim Arenson, 3020 Blue Leaf Court, Quail Hollow, requested that Consent Item 3 be pulled. Member O'Dell moved to approve items 1, 4, and 7-15 of the Consent Agenda. Member Strom seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. AMIGOS AT SHIELDS PUD - FINAL, #47-90B Ted Shepard, City Planner, explained that the project had preliminary approval with five conditions. Mr. Shepard stated that staff had reviewed the conditions and that it was their opinion that the conditions were satisfied. Mr. Shepard said that the reason the item was pulled was to modify former Condition Number 2, by adding the clause: "AND off -site drainage easement". He noted that this condition was now the only condition attached to approval. The condition now reads: The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit development final plan upon the condition that the development agreement, final utility plans, final P.U.D. plans, and offsite drainage easement for the planned unit development be negotiated between the developer and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the second monthly meeting (May 24, 1993) of the Planning and Zoning Board following the meeting at which this planned unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it shall first find that there exists with respect to said planned unit development final plan certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which which require the granting of the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner or developer of such property and provided that such extension can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. P & Z Minutes March 29, 1993 Page 3 If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to be included in the development agreement, the developer may present such dispute to the Board for resolution if such presentation is made at the next succeeding or second succeeding monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table any such decision, until both the staff and the developer have had reasonable time to present sufficient information to the Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects to table the decision, it shall also extend the term of this condition until the date such decision is made.) If this condition is not met within the time established herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final approval of this planned unit development shall become null and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date that the condition is met, for purposes of determining the vesting of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article H, Division 3, of the City Code, the "final decision" of the Board shall be deemed to have have been made at the time of this conditional approval; however, in the event that a dispute is presented to the Board for resolution regarding provisions to be included in the development agreement, the running of time for the filing of an appeal of such "final decision" shall be counted from the date of the Board's decision resolving such dispute. Mr. Shepard stated that the clause denoted an item which was site -specific to this project. Mr. Shepard said that at this time the City did not have the off -site drainage easement, but anticipated getting it in the very near future. Vice Chair Carroll asked if anyone representing the applicant had any comments on the condition. There was no response. Vice Chair Carroll asked if the Board or staff had any questions. There was no response. PUBLIC INPUT Vice Chair Carroll asked if any member of the public wished to address the matter. There was no response. PUBLIC INPUT CLOSED P & Z Minutes March 29, 1993 Page 4 Member Cottier moved for approval of Amigos at Shields PUD - F'mal. Member Klataske seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. BURNS RANCH AT QUAIL RIDGE AMENDED RF SITE PLAN REVIEW AND 2ND FILING - FINAL, #23-90D Tim Arenson requested a full report on the project. Kirsten Whetstone, City Planner, gave an overview of the project. She noted that the project had preliminary approval. Ms. Whetstone stated that this amendment to the preliminary plan included a modification replacing two of the larger subdivision lots with six smaller cluster lots, and increasing the total lot number from 22 to 26 for the Second Filing. Ms. Whetstone added that the site plan met two of the zoning requirements: 1) that the gross residential density be at least one dwelling unit per acre, and 2) that the dwelling units be clustered in the residential portion of the plan at a density of 3-5 dwelling units per acre, with the remainder of the site dedicated to the City of Fort Collins as perpetual open space. Eldon Ward, Cityscape Urban Design, stated that he was representing the applicant. Mr. Ward noted that Dan Jensen, who was also involved in the project development, was present to answer questions. Mr. Ward clarified that the Cluster Plan for the entire development was approved in 1991 and that the north half of the project was platted. He stated that the current item was an amendment to the Cluster Plan, and a the filing of Phase II of development. Mr. Ward presented a map showing the change to the plan. He stated that the number of total units increased by two, and that the open space amount increased by three acres. Vice Chair Carroll asked if there were any questions from the Board at the present time. There were none. PUBLIC INPUT Member O'Dell asked if the presentation given had clarified all the questions for the gentleman who had asked that the item be pulled, or if he had further questions.