HomeMy WebLinkAboutTACO BELL RESTAURANT 11.15.1990 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING - 51-90 - MINUTES/NOTES - CORRESPONDENCE-NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING:.
SECOND NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
PROJECT: Taco Bell at Prospect and College P.U.D.
APPLICANT: Les Nordhagen, Taco Bell
REPRESENTATIVE: Al Hauser, Architecture One
DATE: November 15, 1990
PROJECT PLANNER: Ted Shepard
QUESTIONS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS
The meeting began with a presentation by Officer Ken Kirchoff, Crime Prevention
Division, Fort Collins Police Services. Data from Police records were discussed. There
were about 22 calls to 1538 South College (Taco Bell) from January to September of
1990. Most of these calls were minor. Most calls were late at night. Most incidents were
resolved by the time officers arrived on the scene.
According to Officer Kirchoff, the Taco Bell manager is very good about calling in a
report quickly at the beginning of an incident which helps alleviate the situation. The
shift commander reported that the number of incidents at Taco Bell is no better or
worse than any other establishment that stays open late at night. In fact, the Taco Bell
on West Elizabeth is considered worse than the one at Prospect and College. Off -duty
police officers work at both stores on weekends.
Officer Kirchoff encouraged citizens to summon police at any disturbance. Its the job
of Police Services to respond.
The Following Comments Pertain to Officer Kirchoff's Presentation
2. One citizen suggested that a letter be written to the parent corporation, Pepsico, in order
to get Taco Bell to minimize the disturbances to the neighborhood.
3. One citizen, who has a teenager in school, reports that Taco Bell has a reputation for a
place to obtain drugs.
4. As a taxpayer, one citizen resents the fact that his tax dollars are being used to "babysit"
Taco Bell during late hours while the company sits back and makes a profit. This
represents a public subsidy and Taco Bell is enjoying a free ride.
5. It was acknowledged by all the parties that the worst problem is after "teen night" at
Fort Ram. This special night allows teens into Fort Ram on Sunday evenings during the
summer, or whenever there is no school on the following Monday. Teen night has been
discussed with the manager of Fort Ram who acknowledges that teen night has become
an institution and that advertising is not necessary. It is not unusual to have kids come
in from Cheyenne and Greeley. The manager is aware that Taco Bell is a destination
after the bar closes at midnight.
Y
6. One citizen suggested that Taco Bell represents an attractive nuisance by staying open
so late.
7. Noise is the biggest problem at Taco Bell with car stereos being the worst offenders.
Could the recently passed noise ordinance be used to keep the noise level down?
RESPONSE: According to Officer Kirchoff, the new noise ordinance has not been
enforced against loud car stereos. This question will be referred to Officer Rich
Johnson, Special Enforcement Unit, who administers the noise ordinance.
8. It is likely that most of the litter at High School Park originates at Taco Bell.
9. One citizen expressed that the proposed building expansion and adding a drive-thru
lane are not the critical issues. The most important aspect of the P.U.D. is to get Taco
Bell to be a more considerate neighbor, and to respect the values of the surrounding
residents.
RESPONSE: Taco Bell has worked hard since the last meeting to control the problems.
The off -duty officer is trying to keep loitering to a minimum. Taco Bell is not aware
of any drug dealing on the premises. Taco Bell will make a commitment to close the
restaurant on Sunday evenings at midnight so the Fort Ram crowd will not disturb the
area. Hopefully, this will change the perception among teens that Taco Bell is the
hangout on Sundays.
In addition, Taco Bell will consider closing the loop in the drive-thru exit lane that
would allow cars to cycle back into the parking lot. This may help discourage loitering.
Closing the lobby earlier than the drive-thru lane may also help. This is being done now
on West Elizabeth and seems to have a positive effect on reducing loitering in the
parking lot. Taco Bell continues to have an employee who is charged with picking up
litter in the alley and the surrounding area every morning.
The following Comments Pertain to Al Hauser's Presentation
10. The installation of a four foot wide, concrete median in Prospect to restrict turning
movements is applauded. By preventing left turns into the site, thru traffic will not be
blocked on Prospect. This is a big improvement.
11. What trees will be lost with the expansion?
RESPONSE: There are two trees by the existing house that would be lost. The large
tree on College Avenue would be saved.
12. How will the median on Prospect and the new right turn lane affect the landscaping
along the Prospect frontage?
RESPONSE: Unfortunately, the area devoted to landscaping along Prospect would be
severely impacted by the new dedications for public improvements. It will be very
difficult to place down any sod or shrub beds. However, in urban situations, it will be
possible to use tree grates to install deciduous shade trees and ornamental trees. Taco
Bell will work with the Planning Department and the City Forester to get as much
material in as possible. Please keep in mind that the decision to give up landscaping is
not made easily but, rather, is a trade-off to install the traffic improvements.
13. How long will it take to complete the Choices 95 project?
RESPONSE: As you know, the Choices 95 project is not a bond issue or special
improvement district but a sales tax funded capital improvement plan. The project will
be completed by 1993 subject to projected revenues derived from the general sales tax
over the next three years. This "pay as you go" approach was approved by the voters in
a special election.
14. What are the opportunities for promoting bicycle traffic with the Choices 95 project?
RESPONSE: Since bikes are not allowed on College Avenue, the adjacent sidewalks will
be widened to conform to the arterial standard of seven feet. Bikes are safer on the
sidewalk in this location than on the street.
15. One citizen would like to go on record to promote as much physical improvement to the
intersection as possible. With a direct linkage to I-25, this intersection is critical from
a regional transportation perspective. The City should be actively pursuing State
funding assistance. With two corners vacant, the City should consider purchasing right-
of-way to take advantage of low property values before these corners are developed.
By acquiring these corners, the City can construct whatever is necessary to improve
traffic movement, and would be able to control the land uses and potential curb cuts.
If these properties develop, and are entitled to access to the arterial streets, then the
efficiency of the intersection will suffer, congestion will be added, and safety will
suffer. The time to act is now.
RESPONSE: These are good comments. Greg Lanning, project manager for the
College/Prospect Choice 95 project is in attendance and will make a note of these
suggestions.
16. What has been decided about the fence height along the alley?
RESPONSE: Taco Bell would prefer a six foot high versus an eight foot fence. An
eight foot fence resembles more of a wall and could block light. from the adjacent
properties. At the moment, Taco Bell is considering a solid, masonry, six foot fence.
17. Would Taco Bell consider a decorative, landscaped trellis on top of a six foot fence to
help block the noise?
RESPONSE: Sound is not effectively blocked by a trellis with vines or plantings.
Sound buffering is accomplished with mass. A trellis may be considered from a
decorative standpoint but not from a noise buffering standpoint.
18. What are the plans for the existing house?
RESPONSE: Taco Bell has explored using the house but has found that the floor plan
does not allow for our kitchen equipment to be installed in an effective manner. Taco
Bell is of the belief that if the house were used, it would have to be remodeled beyond
recognition. Discussions have taken place with the Fort Collins Housing Authority who
has experience in relocating houses. Taco Bell does not want to destroy the house.
19. Where will employees park?
RESPONSE: Employees will park in the lot in designated spaces.
20. How many more parking spaces are there?
RESPONSE: The new lot is proposed to have 32 versus the present number of 21.
21. Since your Campus West store closes the lobby late at night and just serves from the
drive-thru, would you be willing to do this at Prospect and College.
RESPONSE: Taco Bell is seriously considering this partial closure on weekends to help
prevent disturbances.
22. Does Taco Bell know that Poudre R-1 is considering moving Fort Collins High School
to a new location in the southeast part of the City? Will this affect the expansion plans?
RESPONSE: Yes, Taco Bell is aware that the bond issue passed but that the School
Board has not taken final action on the high school relocation.
23. One citizen expressed the fact that he lives in the neighborhood and feels the area has
a special character that is different from College Avenue south of Prospect. He is
concerned that the building expansion, the removal of the house, the loss of trees will
all contribute to changing the character that is established. How does Taco Bell feel
about this?
RESPONSE: Thank you for these comments. Taco Bell feels that we are part of the
neighborhood too. We have been there for over 20 years. At present, we are not too
proud of the existing store. We think a new facility will upgrade the intersection.
Certainly our store in Longmont, next to Twin Peaks Mall, is of higher quality than the
existing store. It is acknowledged that given the current site constraints, and the
Choices 95 project, that there will be trade-offs. The new store will more tasteful, the
intersection improvements will help the entire City, and we hope to solve the noise
problems.
OPERATION AT COLLEGE/PROSPECT INTERSECTION
Condition Noon
Existing Condition
►0-30-90
PM
Existing geometrics D(29.7) D(29.7)
With Choices 95 C(23.3) C(24.7)
With Choices 95, RT arrow EB/NB/SB C(22.9) C(24.1)
With Choices 95, single SBLT, RT arrow EB/NB/SB C(22.9) C(24.3)
Future Traffic, Full Access @ Prospect
With Choices 95, RT arrow EB/NB/SB
With Choices 95, single SBLT, RT arrow EB/NB/SB
With Choices 95, RT arrow EB/NB/SB/WB, WBRT lane
With Choices 95, single SBLT, RT arrow
EB/NB/SB/WB, WBRT lane
Future Traffic, R-in/P.-out Access @ Prospect
With Choices 95, RT arrow EB/NB/SB
With Choices 95, single SBLT, RT arrow EB/NB/SB
With Choices 95, RT arrow EB/NB/SB/WB, WBRT lane
With Choices 95, single SBLT, RT arrow
EB/NB/SB/WB, WBRT lane
C(23.0) D(25.3)
C(23.1) D(25.5)
C(22.6) C(24.9)
C(22.7) D(25.1)
C(22.9) D(25.2)
C(23. 0 ) D(25.5)
C ( 22. 6 ) C(24.9)
C(22.7) D(25.1)