HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ASPEN STATON - 34 91 - CORRESPONDENCE - LEGAL COMMUNICATION (4)Start of Item 7.
Message.
Subject: U.S.P.O.
Sender: Paul ECKMAN / CFC/01
TO: Ted SHEPARD / CFC52/01
Part 1
FROM: Paul ECKMAN / CFC/01
TO: Ted SHEPARD / CFC52/01
Part 2.
Dated: 12/03/90 at 1457.
Contents: 2.
I have received your electronic message dated 11/30/90 regarding
fees which may be charged against the Postal Service for the construction
of the new post office. Of the fees you listed, I believe that the
water plant investment, water rights acquisition, sewer plant investment,
storm drainage, electrical off -site and electric on -site fees may be
charged against the Postal Service. I do not believe that the plan
check fees or street oversizing fees may be charged against the Postal
Service. I would recommend that you initially take the position that
the Postal Service must pay the street oversizing fee to off -set their
impact on the neighboring streets, but I would not recommend that you
push it much further than that. If the Postal Service refuses to pay
the fee, you would have no leverage to enforce the payment of the fee
short of a lawsuit, which I do not believe the City would win.
WPE:whm
End of Item 7.
Intray >
U