HomeMy WebLinkAboutUNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ASPEN STATON - 34 91 - CORRESPONDENCE - MEETING COMMUNICATION (2)000
000
000
MERRICK
1991 NATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS
SUBCONTRACTOR OF THE YEAR
November 8, 1991
Ref: 111-7440
CONFERENCE NOTES No. 15
Date: November 1, 1991
Location:
Reference:
Prepared By :
Attendees:
281 N. College
Aspen Station
Fort Collins, Co,orado
Russ Nelson 'rZ N1J-�
Sharad Shrestha
Tom Peterson
Mike Herzig
Matt Baker
W. Paul Eckman
Russ Nelson
1.0 Purpose:
USPS
City - Planning
City - Engineering
City - Traffic
City - Legal Council
Merrick & Co.
1.1 Discussion of Development Fees.
2.0 Discussion:
2.1 Sharad was given recommendations that the USPS pay for
fees which are in the "gray area".
2.2 The Street Oversizing Fee and the Warren Lake Trunk Line
Fee are the only two fees yet unresolved as to the "gray
area" fees.
2.3 Sales tax are not the responsibility of the USPS. The
Contractor will .need to work with the City directly on
this issue.
2.4 Street Oversizing Fee is an "impact fee".
(10855 EAST BETHANY DRIVE) ■ P.O. Box 22026 ■ DENVER, COLORADO 80222 ■ (303) 751-0741 ■ FAX (303) 751-2581
2.5 Every developer is required to install a local street as
access to every lot. 18' for each 1/2 of street.
2.6 City pays for the street improvements such as left turns
and medians. This money comes from property taxes.
2.7 The street oversizing fee is based on the unpaid portion
of the street which is used by the area patrons.
2.8 Is the Street Oversizing fee a police fee or a user fee.
The City claims that it is a user fee.
2.9 E. Paul Eckman will send a letter to Sharad.
2.10 Matt Baker will send Merrick & Company the traffic ranges
for the different categories.
2.11 Dottie provided her numbers used in calculating the Storm
Drainage Fee: 75.3% impervious
24.7% pervious= 0.76 runoff coefficient
9479 CF/Ac of detention from Glen
Schlueter.
2.12 The Warren Lake Trunk Line Fee is based on the oversizing
of the trunk line. This fee is a user fee that was not
previously addressed as a development fee to the LISPS.
2.13 City requests that the USPS plat the property. The City
will not charge the normal fees for platting the
property. The City will ask that the USPS pay only the
recording fee.
2.14 Handicap ramps were discussed with Mike Herzig. Mike
does not have a concern about deleting the 1/2" lip from
the City Standard detail. We concurred that the USPS
detail can be used. (No lip will be provided.)
3.0 Action Items
3.1 W. Paul Eckman will prepare a letter to Sharad stating
the City's position as it relates to the Street
Oversizing Fee.
3.2 Matt Baker will send Merrick & Company the traffic count
breakdown for the five categories listed in the
Development Manual.
3.3 Merrick & Company will discuss the Storm Drainage Fee
further with Dottie.
3.4 Merrick & Company will discuss the Street Oversizing Fee
further with Matt.
4.0 Potential Changes
4.1 Merrick & Company may be authorized to provide platting
documents to the City sometime in the near future.
CONCLUSIONS/FUTURE ACTION REQUIRED
(Conference Action- A = Approved Comment, D = Disapproved Comment,
W = Withdrawn Comment, E = Comment with Exception)
------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRIBUTION: All attendees, Contract Administrator, Central File
IF AGREEMENTS REACHED/COMMENTS MADE ARE NOT AS YOU
RECALL, PLEASE RETURN CORRECTION WITHIN FIVE DAYS
Bradley W. Dodds, AIA
Project Manager
BWD/BAT/alh