Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUN DISK VILLAGE REPLAT PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - 15 91 - CORRESPONDENCE - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEWDevelopr. t Services Planning Department March 8, 1991 John Giuliano Giuliano & Father Construction, Inc. 1708 East Lincoln Avenue Fort Collins, Co Dear John: For your information, attached is a copy of the Staff's.comments concerning the Sund Disk PUD which was presented before the Conceptual Review Team on March 4, 1991. The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist you in preparing the detailed components of the project application. Modifications and additions to these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project. If you should have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the review process, please feel free to call me at 221-6750. Sinc rely, S Olt Project Planner SO/gjt Attachment xc: Tom Peterson, Director of Planning Kerrie Ashbeck, Civil Engineer I Project Planner File 281 North Collcoo Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • i oit Collins, CO 80522-0580 • O031 221-0 50 CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF ODMMENTS MEETING DATE: March 4, 1991 ITEM: Sun Disk PUD APPLICANT: John Giuliano Giuliano & Father Construction Inc. 1708 East Lincoln Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado LAND USE DATA: Request to develop 25 single-family detached homes on 7.7 acres. COMMENTS: 1. This. property is in the RP, Planned residential zone. Single family detached homes are allowed in that zone. 2. A PUD for 96 dwelling units was approved for this property in 1981. The PUD will still be valid if substantial improvements, streets and utilities, have been completed on this site. In that eventuality, a request must be submitted and reviewed as a PUD, . sub}ect to the requirements at that time. The - improvements for this property apparently have not been substantially completed, therefore, a subdivision review request is possible. It is important to assure that the existing multi -family units, not to be part of your development, can stand on their as a PUD, especially concerning the required open space. 3. There is electric power to this site. A main line along the west side of Windmill Drive may be tapped into. City Light & Power may want to abandon existing conduit from the south. Normal electric charges will apply. 4. A sewer main that exists through the site may be tapped —into or relocated, if necessary. It may not be .abandoned and removed, however, as it is the service line for adjacent development. 5. A water tap exists just north of the access from Windmill Drive into this property. Depending on what your plans are for .the realignment or widening of the entrance, a new tap may have to be provided to keep it in the street. At that time the existing tap would be abandoned. 6. This site is in the Foothills Drainage Basin and is subject to basin fees of $5,024/acre, to be assessed at the time of issuance of certificate of occupancy. 46 7. On -site detention will be required for this development. The detention pond, as conceptually planned, should be independent of the existing pond in Five Oaks PUD to the west. 8. A revised drainage report and plan, derived from the Sun Disk PUD report, must be included with the formal PUD or subdivision submittal. 9. The City is in the process of developing an Erosion Control Plan for adoption. This plan scheduled to be adopted in May of this year. It is being requested that you voluntarily provide an erosion control plan as part of this submittal. 10. One fire hydrant should be adequate in this development for the 25 homes as proposed. The hydrant must be within 400' of each house, with the recommended location being at the T- intersection on the property. 11. The City. Transportation Department has no concerns with this proposal since the traffic generated should significantly decrease with fewer number of dwelling units. 12. A. $625/unit Parkland Fee is assessed on residential development and is collected at the time of issuance of a building permit. 13. There is a reimbursement agreement on Windmill Drive. Please contact Matt Baker at 221-7732 about any existing Special Improvements Districts obligations attached to this property. 14. Street oversizing fees of $584/dwelling unit will be collected at time of issuance of building permits. 15. Utility plans and a plat dedicating street ROW and necessary easements must be included as part of the submittal. 16. The compatibility of lots to those in adjacent developments is important. The size, lot widths and depths should be considered thoroughly. 17. The City receives numerous complaints annually about the maintenance and condition of the neighboring detention pond in five Oaks. It will be important to incorporate provisions to maintain your detention pond adequately. 18. Common open space is not a requirement in a subdivision but would be considered a positive amenity in the development. 19. A neighborhood meeting is required prior to your formal submittal due to the significant change in character proposed. Please work out the scheduling details with Steve Olt as soon as possible.