Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUN DISK VILLAGE REPLAT PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - 15 91 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSITEM NG. 7 MEETING DATE 5/20/91 STAFF Steve Olt City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Sun Disk Village - #15-91 APPLICANT: John Giuliano 1708 East Lincoln Fort Collins, CO. 80524 OWNER: Giuliano & Father 1708 East Lincoln Fort Collins, CO. 80524 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Preliminary Subdivision, Request to replat 6.55 acres of undeveloped ground in the approved Sun Disk Village PUD from approximately 75 multi -family dwelling units to 25 single-family lots. This property is located north of West Horsetooth Road and east of Windmill Drive and is zoned RP - Planned Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This request is for 25 single-family lots on 6.55 acres in a standard subdivision. All lots in this development will access off of interior local streets, being double cul-de-sacs. The developer will grant a landscape easement along the back of lots 21, 22, 23 in a turf grass parkway adjacent to Windmill Drive. Fencing guidelines will be provided with the final plat to give examples of height and materials intended for the proposed fences along the periphery of the development. The City will assume responsibility for the maintenance of the storm drainage facilities. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 300 LaPorte Ave. P.O. Boa 580 Fort Collins. Ca 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Sun Disk Village Subdivision - Preliminary Subdivision, Case #15-91 May 20, 1991 P & Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background• The surrounding zoning and land use is as follows: N: RL, single-family residential (Woodwest Seventh Filing Subdivision) S: RLP, single-family residential (Four Seasons PUD) E: RLP, single-family residential (Foothills Park Resubdivision) W: RP, multi -family residential (Cunningham Corner PUD) This property was annexed into the City as Cunningham Corner Third Annexation in 1980. Park West PUD, a request for 96 townhomes on 10 acres, received preliminary approval from the Planning & Zoning Board in August, 1980 and City Council in September, 1980. Final approval for Sun Disk Village PUD (originally Park West PUD) was given by the Planning & Zoning Board in February, 1981. An extension for the Sun Disk Village PUD was granted until August, 1983. The first three buildings north of West Horsetooth Road, containing 16 multi -family units, have been built to date. There are two building envelopes between the existing units and this request that are not a part of the replat. 2. Land Use• This request is to replat a portion of the existing Sun Disk Village PUD to allow for 25 single-family subdivision lots. The original plan was approved for multi -family units. 3. Design• This is a standard subdivision plat with one point of access, that being from Windmill Drive, a local street. The entry street will intersect with two cul-de-sacs, to the north and the south. All lots will gain access from the interior streets. On -street parking will be allowed. The developer will grant a 10' wide landscape easement at the back of Lots 21, 22, 23, along Windmill Drive, and install 6 City approved street trees at approximately 40' on -center in a manicured turf grass parkway setting. These three lots will have a deed restriction attached to them to assure that the lawn and trees will be maintained by the respective lot owners. The installation of the trees will be coordinated with the utilities in the area. Sun Disk village Subdivision - Preliminary Subdivision, Case #15-91 May 20, 1991 P & Z Meeting Page 3 Fencing guidelines will be provided with the Final subdivision plat that convey the intended character for possible fences along Windmill Drive and the detention area to the north and west of the property. 4. Neighborhood Compatibility: A neighborhood meeting was held at Rocky Mountain High School on March 21, 1991 with 5 people, other than the applicant and project planner, attending. Questions and concerns centered around the existing detention pond in Five Oaks Village, to the west, and how the detention pond in this development would interface with it. The minutes of the meeting are included as an attachment to the staff report. This request is compatible with the surrounding area and the land uses adjacent to the property. The proposed single-family homes will be similar to those existing in the subdivisions to the north and east, and compliment the mixed housing types in the Cunningham Corner phases to the west. 5. Transportation: The single point of access to this site will be from Windmill Drive, which is a local street. There is approximately 800 linear feet of streets internal to this development. They will be public streets and carry a local status. There will not be street connections to adjacent properties to the north, south, or east. 6. Storm Drainage: The detention pond and storm drainage swale at the north and west portion of the property will be designated as a "Tract" and dedicated to the City with the Final Plat. At that time the City will be responsible for the maintenance of these facilities. RECOMMENDATION This request is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations and the RP -Planned Residential Zoning District requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of Sun Disk Village - Preliminary Subdivision, #15-91. La..I D M man i� WIP-1 1 � 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT aNQ REPLAT OF SUN DISK VILLAGE SCAL[: I"-50 I 2 I 3 I 4 I S \I G l IG I IS /( I] I s FC)o TH L P/anl I '3C3 OD�✓V3/C1N� I I 104 20 - 1 %Y ����� " • TIIS�.Iet NOYI « aZ Y' ♦>" ' c !�' Yam. — — / I / - /g li l"'nn/zl IF '• 2` ~ I y�,� - , s W Z —. I L ' l N u. s.n ow rn lw..Ll, w mr Y..a so a nw uu. y M.�Y :. J.w"IW w Ioll.n: pgln rt N. mmlMal nrwr N YN S.. Y I61.01 Ml tY.w.�OY H' A' Y IW.00 Iwl: tlwe Y W }i' p" Y EBO.iO � � Y_ IM: tMo .1 .ry N . Ap, W Iwt NI.. vw V. INt . I g+ l: Vr:n IID4P t m' Y.R.iwMl�Ywn w 0. 4. IL.SI1Mt 1 b N. Mnl N 4pImIM. aa:UnaM 0.5'L cm, wn w lea. � � IY ki uN C � H F rP x N J VWINIM MAP 4p Q 4 c i q o> o z ze � h $CALL-I:\pj ••I yr)•, POPULATION PROJECTIONS PROPOSAL: SUN DISK VILLAGE, Replat DESCRIPTION: 25 single family homes on 6.55 acres DENSITY: 3.82 du/ac General Population 25(units) x 3.5 (persons/unit) = 87.5 School Age Population Elementary - 25 (units) x .450(pupils/units) = 11.25 Junior High - 25 (units) x .210(pupils/unit) = 5.25 Senior High - 25 (units) x .185(pupils/unit) = 4.63 Affected Schools Design Enrollment Capacity Beattie Elementary —�546— 507 Boltz Junior High 950 747 Rocky Mountain Senior High 1250 1142 a 4�5wn V"k XIUAwr , 4i1D (e-U wu►narc� LL DEVELOPMENT; NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY ITERION FNEIGHBORHOOD Is the criterion applicoblei Will the criterion be zotislied9 If no, please explain ,e:F, �,� �aF Yes No OD COMPATABILITY omputability orhood Character e Conflicts Traffic Impact OLICIES 5. Comprehensive Plan PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY 6. Street Capacity 7. Utility Capacity 8. Design Standards 9. Emergency Access 10. Security Lighting 11. Water Hazards RESOURCE PROTECTION 12. Soils & Slope Hazard 13. Significant Vegetation 14. Wildlife Habitat 15. Historical Landmark 16. Mineral Deposit 17. Eco-Sensitive Areas 18. Agricultural Lands ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS 19. Air Quality 20. Water Quality 21. Noise 22. Glare & Heat 23. Vibrations 24. Exterior Lighting 25. Sewages & Wastes SITE DESIGN 26. Community Organization - - 27: Site Organization --- 28. Natural Features 29. Energy Conservation 30.Shadows 31. Solar Access 32. Privacy 33. Open Space Arrangement 34. Building Height 35. Vehicular Movement 36. Vehicular Design 37. Parking 38. Active Recreational Areas 39. Private Outdoor Areas 40. Pedestrian Convenience 41. Pedestrian Conflicts 42. Landscaping/Open Areas 43. Landscaping/Buildings 44. LanascapingiScreening 45, Public Access I 46. Sions �i/14 0 -12- A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING was held to discuss the Sun Disk Village proposal that was presented to the Concept Review Team with the City of Fort Collins. The following Comments, Concerns, and Responses were expressed at this meeting. Date: March 21, 1991 Place: Rocky Mountain High School Time: 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. Planner: Stephen Olt, City of Fort Collins Applicant: John Giuliano, Developer 1. What is the difference between a subdivision and a PUD? A subdivision is subject to all the standard zoning code requirements. A PUD is evaluated by the Land Development Guidance System, which is a flexible zoning instrument. 2. What priced homes do you expect to build here? In the $70,000 - $90,000 range. They will be similar to the homes in Warren Farms. 3. We really don't want to see two separate detention ponds here. Could you combine the two (the existing in Five Oaks Village and proposed in Sun Disk Village) and create enough usable open space for a park -like setting? There will not be a Home Owners Association here to maintain the detention pond and the City does not want to maintain this new pond at the same level of improvements that the detention pond in Five Oaks was designed and approved for. 4. Has the City approached any one to facilitate —combining the --- detention ponds? No, not to my knowledge. 5. What is the track record of the City assuming responsibility for new detention ponds? They do accept responsibility for drainage facilities on a case -by -case basis. The proposal is for the City to accept maintenance of this pond but a decision has not yet been made. 6. What are the characteristics that allow the City to take over this detention pond but not the Five Oaks Vilage pond? Primarily the level of maintenance required based on the degree of improvements and landscaping. 7. Does it not seem strange to allow two separate detention ponds separated by a berm and developed to different levels of improvements? This can occur depending on the position of the City Stormwater Utility. It is not desirable but possible. 8. I have a concern about the lack of landscaping shown along Windmill Drive. Can you require trees? In a standard subdivision the City can recommend and even request trees, but cannot require them. 9. Please verify the fact that the improvements to the detention .pond in Tract 'C' of Five Oaks Village are predicated on the build -out of Parcel 'B'. That is accommodated in the Development Agreement for Five Oaks Village. 10. The development activity that is going on in Cunningham Corner is construction of infrastructure, not homes? Yes. 11. Should the outflow pipe in a detention pond be designed above the bottom of the pond to allow for standing water, depending on evaporation and percolation? That appears to be the case in the existing pond in Five Oaks village. No, that is not an acceptable design solution. 12. Is there any way to get someone involved as facilitator to attempt to get the appropriate parties together to work out the difficulties of completing the detention pond in Five Oaks Village? The possibility can -be investigated.-- --- - ----- 13. This Sun Disk Village proposal looks good. I'm pleased to see this property going to single-family lots.