HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992 SOUTHWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE PLAN ADVISORY REVIEW - 16 91 - CORRESPONDENCE - MEETING COMMUNICATIONw
1992 SOUTHWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION MEETING
DATE: March 27, 1991
ATTENDEES: Mike Spearnak, Poudre R-1
Ben Hatch, CDS Engineering
Matt Delich, Traffic Consultant
Mike Herzig, City Engineer
Rick Ensdorff, Transportation Director
Kerrie Ashbeck, City Engineer
Randy Balok, Park Planner
Ted Shepard, City Planner
COMMENTS:
The purpose of the meeting is to define the scope of the Traffic
Impact Analysis.
According to PR-1, the school site location is a given. If it is
moved, it will be moved less than 25 feet to the north. It will
not be moved 100 feet to the north as requested by Mr. Peterson,
owner of Lot 44, Clarendon Hills Third Filing. PR-1 will explore
buffering options, including conifers and berms, rather than shift
the site. The school site is approximately 7.8 acres.
The City Parks and Rec Dept. will share the school parking lot. If
this site is selected for a neighborhood park, it will contain
between 6-9 acres. It will feature a ballfield, playground, picnic
shelters, restrooms, and be a "typical neighborhood park".
Without a signal at Hinsdale/Harmony, the intersection will allow
full turning access with stop sign control.
Hinsdale will not align with any street to the north.
In terms of street capacity and trip generation, the west side of
Hinsdale must be factored to include some type of development. It
would be the preference of PR-1 that this area develop as
residential to compliment the walk-in school concept. Also, the
full build -out of Clarendon Hills should be assumed (about 300
homes).
It would be preferable if the F.R:C.C. could shift their Harmony
access so it would align with Starflower, a collector street. This
would reduce the number of offset intersections on Harmony Road.
J
` A
Design considerations for Hinsdale include:
* Reduce the attractiveness for "short -cutting"
* Possible "neck -down" from 36 to 28 at the Clarendon Hills
entry.
* Using the existing cul-de-sac bulb for a "traffic circle".
* Design speed is 30 m.p.h., posted for 25 m.p.h.
* Sight distance due to grade changes from north to south
* Curb cuts on Hinsdale for the school would also have to serve
future development on the west side. Offset curb cuts would
not be allowed.
The "traffic circle" idea needs to be researched since the
homeowners (Lot 44) would have to grant permanent dedication rather
than an easement for a temporary turn -around as currently stated on
the plat. This would involve separate negotiation.
The Parks and Rec. Dept. has again emphasized that they would
prefer a park that "wraps around" the school. Shifting the school
to the north allows more frontage on Hinsdale.
The proposed 60 parking spaces for the school would be sufficient
for a park.
Hinsdale should be posted "No Parking" to help with sight distance
but could be used for overflow parking during annual events.
The length of the painted center turn lane on Harmony should be
determined.
The survey should extend at least 500 feet in both directions from
the intersection of Harmony/Hinsdale.
Hinsdale needs to tie into Clarendon Hills according to standards.
This may mean that PR-1 will have to construct "off -site"
improvements. The City Engineering Dept. will investigate the
Clarendon Hills Development Agreement to see what obligations fall
to what party and what is required by Code.
The improvements to Harmony Road will continue to be an issue. If
the burden of improving Harmony Road falls to the remaining parcel
west of Hinsdale, then this may become a cost prohibitive factor
that makes the ground undevelopable. Although this issue is not
directly related to the construction of the school, it is a long
term issue that will have to be addressed eventually.
., t. . • .►
9
The Traffic Consultant is encouraged to submit a preliminary draft
of the Traffic Impact Analysis for City review and comment. This
is anticipated to be sometime in mid April.
CDS Engineering needs to establish the location of the intersection
of Harmony/Hinsdale as soon as possible. The documents must be in
final form for the bidding process in early May.
Although the project is scheduled for the May 20th Planning and
Zoning Board meeting, the City will review all plans on an
accelerated schedule due to the time frame required by PR-1.