HomeMy WebLinkAboutFLUTTERBY PRESCHOOL PUD PRELIMINARY AND FINAL - 27 91 - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
JUNE 24, 1991 MEETING
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board began at 6:35 p.m. in the Council
Chamber of New City Hall, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Board members
present included: Chairman Jim Klataske, Vice -Chair Bernie Strom, Joseph Carroll, Jr., Laurie
O'Dell, Lloyd Walker, Jan Cottier, and Margaret Gorman.
Staff members present included: Planning Director Tom Peterson, Joe Frank, Ken Waido, Ted
Shepard, Kirsten Whetstone, Steve Olt, City Attorney Steve Roy, and Kayla Ballard.
Mr. Peterson gave a description of the Consent and Discussion Agenda which consisted of: Item
1 - #52-79E, Rossborough Subdivision 5th Filing Final; Item 2 - #50-85B, Fort Collins Salad
Company PUD at The Pavilion Final; Item 3-#30-83D,Helmshire House II PUD Preliminary
and Final; Item 4-#27-91,Flutterby Preschool -PUD Preliminary and Final; Item 5-#15-91A,
Sun Disk Village Subdivision Final Replat; Item 6 - #23-90C, Burns Ranch at Quail Ridge RF
Review Final; Item 7-#26-91,Pedersen Toyota Volvo Saab PUD Preliminary and Final, which
was pulled from Consent for discussion; Item 8 - #38-90B, Overland Hills Subdivision, First
Filing Final which was continued to the July meeting; Item 9-#99-79C,Medical Center of Fort
Collins PUD Final; Item 10 - #3-90C, Villages at Harmony West PUD Amended Master Plan;
Item 11-#3-90B,The Platt Property PUD Preliminary; Item 12-#25-91A,Service Center 5th
Annexation and Zoning; Item 13-#78-88C,Horsetooth East Business Park Rezoning; Item 14 -
Resolution #PZ91-9 Vacation of Emergency Access Easement at Creekside at The Landings;
Item 15 -Resolution #PZ91-10 Vacation of Utility Easement at the Replat of Fairway 5 Estates
PUD at Southridge Greens which was continued to the July meeting; and Item 16 -Resolution
PZ91-11 Vacation of Utility Easement at Foothills Apartments PUD which was continued to
the July meeting. The Discussion Agenda consisted of: Item 17-#37-90,East Side/West Side
Rezonings; Item 18 - #28-91, Amendments to Chapter 29 of the City Code Relating to the
Hazardous Materials Risk Reduction Program; Item 19- #23-83C, Toys "R" Us/Western Auto
PUD Final; Item 20 - #112-79N, Four Seasons Subdivision 8th Filing Preliminary and Final;
Item 21-#4-83M,Hickory Hill Village at Cunningham Corners PUD Tract G Final; Item 22 -
#55-87C, The Gates at Woodridge (Arapahoe Farm) PUD Final, and; Item 23 - #55-87D, The
Overlook at Woodridge (Arapahoe Farm) PUD Final.
Mr. Peterson stated that Item #19, Toys "R." Us, would be moved to the bottom of the agenda
due to Items 20, 21, 22 and 23 having staff issues resolved.
Mr. Peterson gave a description of the administrative change request for Builders Square at
Harmony Market PUD, which was under Other Business.
Chairman Klataske asked if there was any Board member that wished to pull an item from the
Consent Agenda.
Member O'Dell asked that Item #2, Fort Collins Salad Company PUD at The Pavilion Final be
pulled for discussion.
Chairman Klataske asked if there was any of from the audience that wished to pull an item
from the Consent Agenda for additional discussion.
Mr. R.D. Laken requested that Item #12, Service Center 5th Annexation and Zoning be pulled
for further discussion.
Ms. Dinkelman also requested that Item #12 be pulled for discussion.
Member Carroll moved to approve Consent Agenda Items 1, 3y 40 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 14.
Member Strom seconded the motion. The motion to approve carried 7-0.
FORT COLLINS SALAD COMPANY PUD AT THE PAVILION -FINAL -Case #50-85B
Member O'Dell stated that she had concerns with development of the pads and facing the back
of the building into the Center. She stated that in this case, as was with the Black Eye Pea
Restaurant, she understood why the applicant wanted it that way when most of the traffic is
access from College Avenue and that they would want the signs and the entrance in the interest
of the building on College Avenue. But in this case, when JFK Parkway is built, a lot of people
will access the Center from the east side, where no signs for this building would be seen. She
asked if any consideration had been given to adding some interest and moving one of the signs
further back onto the building so it would be part of the Center rather than just a strip of
restaurants on College Avenue.
Ted Shepard, project planner, asked Member O'Dell if she had concerns with the view from
Troutman.
Member O'Dell stated that she had concerns with the view from Lionel P1ayWorld.
Mr. Shepard stated that staff had struggled with this. He stated that when there is a pad site,
a building is basically designed with four fronts. The service side has to be on one of the
fronts. What the applicant tried to accomplish was screening the trash enclosure, the
transformer, and minimize the impact as much as poa.;ible. He stated that Member O'Dell was
correct in that there does have to be one service side and that was the least objectionable
alternative with putting it on the east side. He stated that they assumed there was more traffic
on College Avenue than on the internal circulation drive for the shopping center.
Member O'Dell stated that it appeared the landscaping was adequate in the back and it would
be screened but she believed there could be innovative ways to deal with this so a lot of backs
of buildings would be seen.
Mr. Shepard stated that pad sites were very popular and would be coming in in the future. He
stated that staff should take a good look on how to design the four fronts.
Member Walker moved to approve Fort Collins Salad Company PUD at The Pavilion Final.
Member O'Dell seconded the motion. The motion to approve carried 7-0.
PEDERSEN TOYOTA VOLVO SAAB PUD -PRELIMINARY AND FINAL -Case #26-91
Kirsten Whetstone gave a description of the proposed project. She stated that the project scored
58% on the Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial point chart. She stated that there was no
neighborhood meeting for this project because South College Avenue to Prospect Road has been
defined as a community regional shopping center and an auto use had been deemed compatible
with the surrounding area. She briefly discussed the proposed landscaping, building materials,
signage package.
2