HomeMy WebLinkAboutEAST VINE STREETS FACILITY PUD AMENDED FINAL - 30 91D - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - DRAINAGE REPORTAMMENDED FINAL
DRAINAGE AND STORM WATER QUALITY STUDY
EAST VINE STREETS FACILITY P.U.D.
PHASE TWO FINAL
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
October 2, 1998
Prepared for:
Client:
Vaught Frye Architects, P.C.
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
Owner:
City of Fort Collins
Streets Department
700 Wood Street
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522
Prepared by:
The Sear -Brown Group
209 South Meldrum Street
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
(970) 482-5922
Project Number: 183-047
I
1
1
THE
SEAR -BROWN
GROUP
Standards in Excellence
The Sw-amwv Gravy
Fort Collins Streets Facility 183-047
Storm Drainage System Preliminary Design (Fort Collins)
Designer. SLG
Storm: 2 yr
Cf = 1.00
Design
Point
Basin(s)
to
(min)
tci
(min)
C x Cf
Intensity
(inthr)
Area
(so)
Remarks
Length
(it)
U/S D.P.
Type
Time
(min)
Direct
(ds)
Other
(cis)
Total
(cis)
Slope
M
Type/
ttFL
Capacity
(cis)
Design
(cis)
Slope
N
Diameter
(in)
Capacity
(cis)
Design
(cis)
Velocity
(fl/s)
1
2
]
4
Ie Ia
5
7
s
a
10
11
12
13
14
148 14b
15
10
/s
17
1s
21
22
23
Individual
Basins
1
H
22.0
22.0
0.61
1.73
4.36
4.6
4.6
0.50
L 1
4lQ
4.0
0.75
18
9.1
0.6
2.6
2
48-1
22.1
22.1
0.95
1.73
0.59
1.0
1.0
0.50
L 1
1.0
0.75
15
5.6
3
48-2
6.2
6.2
0.95
3.02
1.76
5.0
5.0
0.77
L 1
5.0
0.75
24
19.6
4
4B-3
5.8
5.8
0.95
3.08
0.79
2.3
2.3
0.89
L 2
2.3
0.75
18
9.1
5
0-1
7.6
7.6
0.95
2.82
3.17
8.5
8.5
0.89
L 2
13
8.5
0.75
18
9.1
6
O-2
68.0
6&0
0.25
0.54
1.23
0.3
0.3
0.43
L 2
5.7
0.3
0.75
18
9.1
7
88
99
1010
ggregated
Basins
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
Notes: 1. Column 4a idemcies the type of channel used to calculate the velocity for the travel time calculations
2. Column 14a identifies whether the street is a main arterial, collector, or local street for use in the street capacity calculations.
3. For final design submittals, channel 8 pipe velocities are shown elsewhere in this report.
] sep"
M M M M M M
The Sear -Brown Group
Fort Collins Streets Facility
Time of Concentration (Fort Collins)
Designer: SLG
Storm: 100 yr
Cf= 1.25
tl = 1.870.1 - C x COW(1/2)
S"(1/3)
tc= ti+I
183-047
tc
Remarks
Basin
Area
C
C x Cf
Length
Slope
ti
Length
Slope
Velocity
tL
(ac)
M
M
(min)
(ft)
M
MIS)
(min)
(min)
1
2
3
3a
4
5
6
7 7a
8
9
10
11
12
H
4.36
0.61
0.76
60
1.70
4.1
1290
PA
0.50
1.34
16.1
20.2
B-1
0.59
0.95
1.00
180
1.10
2.4
1480
PA
0.50
1.34
18.5
20.9
B-2
1.76
0.95
1.00
190
1.30
2.4
267
PA
0.77
1.67
2.7
5.0
4B-3
0.79
0.95
1.00
130
0.77
2.3
250
PA
0.89
1.80
2.3
5.0
0-1
3.17
0.95
1.00
490
0.92
4.3
135
PA
0.89
1.80
1.3
5.5
0-2
1.23
0.25
0.31
460
0.83
33.6
1925
GW
0.43
1.01
31.8
65.4
Note: Column 7a codes the channel type for velocity calculations.
PA = Paved Area, PL = Pasture& Lawns, GW = Grassed Waterway
30-Sep-98
I
m Sill
Fort Collins Streets Facility
Storm Dminade System Prelhminary Desian
Designer SLG
Storm: 100 yr
Cf = 1.25
(Fort Collins)
183-047
Design
Basin(s)
tc
tC
C z CI
Intensity
Area
Remarks
Length
U/S D.Pl
Time
Direct
Other
Total
Slope
Type/
Capacity
Design
Slope
Diameter
Capacity
Design
Velocity
Point
(min)
(ft)
Type
(min)
(min)
(iNhr)
(ac)
(cis)
(ds)
(cts)
M
#FL
(cis)
(l
M
(in)
Ids)
WS)
ON
1
2
3
4
4a 4b
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
f3
14
/4a 14b
15
19
18
17
1s
21
22
23
Individual
Basins
1
H
2O.2
20.2
0.76
5.15
4.36
17.1
17.1
0.50
L 1
17.1
0.75
18
9.1
2
4B-1
20.9
20.9
1.00
5.05
0.59
3.0
3.0
0.50
L 1
3.0
0.75
15
5.6
3
48-2
5.0
5.0
1.00
9.29
1.76
16.3
16.3
0.77
L 1
16.3
1.70
24
29.5
4
48-3
5.0
5.0
1.00
9.30
0.79
7.3
7.3
0.89
L 2
7.3
0.75
21
13.7
5
O-1
5.5
5.5
1.00
9.04
3.17
28.7
28.7
0.89
L 2
i
28.7
0.75
21
13.7
6
0-2
65.4
65.4
0.31
2.43
1.23
0.9
0.9
0.43
L 2
0.9
0.75
18
9.1
77
88
99
10
10
ggregated
Basins
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
Notes: 1. Column 4a identifies the type of channel used to calculate the velocity for the travel time calculations
2. Column 14a identifies whether the street is a main arterial, collector, or twat street for use in the street capacity calculations.
3. For final design submittals, channel a pipe velocities are shown elsewhere in this report.
3PSel
I
1
11
1
t
1
STORM SEWER SYSTEM
0
L
Fort Collins Streets Facility
SLG
09/30/98
Peak Discharge for Storm Sewer System
Basin
0-1
4B-3
4B-2
Area (ac)
3.17
0.79
1.76
Tc (min)
7.6
5.8
6.2
Intensity in/hr)
2.82
3.08
3.02
C x Cf
0.95
0.95
0.95
Area'C (ac)
3.01
0.75
1.67
Td (min) =
7.6
5.8
6.2
Q (cfs) =
17t05'
14.21
14.89
Q1 (cfs)
M W1ffZ,74
9.39
9.84
Q2 (cfs) _
5i7$
4.82
5.05
Used Q = i(C2A2'td/Tc2+C1Al)
Storm Sewer System Design and Flow Analysis us
James Guo
August1994
M M M
FC Streets Facility
S. Gentry
9/23/98
Pipe
Manhole From
Manhole To
Distance
Invert Up
Invert Down
Rim
Depth
Land Slope
1
PLUG
Al
18.21
4950.92
4950.86
4955.35
4.43
-0.0081
2
Al
Al
328.82
4950.71
4949.56
4955.50
3.29
0.0046
3
Al
OLD PLUG
174.49
4949.41
4948.99
4954.00
3.09
0.0057
4
OLD PLUG
4953.00
51
1
1 1
0.00
r�
1
' STORM SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN USING UDSEWER MODEL
Developed by Civil Eng. Dept, U. of Colorado at Denver
Metro Denver Cities/Counties & UDFCD Pool Fund Study
' USER:RDB-Fort Collins -Colorado ...............................................
ON DATA 09-30-1998 AT TIME 09:14:12 VERSION=01-17-1997
' *** PROJECT TITLE :Fort Collins Streets Facility
*** RETURN PERIOD OF FLOOD IS 2 YEARS
(Design flow hydrology not calculated using UDSEWER)
' *** SUMMARY OF HYDRAULICS AT MANHOLES
MANHOLE CNTRBTING RAINFALL RAINFALL DESIGN GROUND WATER COMMENTS
' ID NUMBER AREA * C DURATION INTENSITY PEAK FLOW ELEVATION ELEVATION
MINUTES INCH/HR CFS FEET FEET
--------------
0.01 17.05 4952.75 4950.95 OK
1.00 17.05 4954.49 4952.21 OK
' 2.00 11.27 4955.67 4953.46 OK
3.00 11.27 4955.67 4953.56 OK
OK MEANS WATER ELEVATION IS LOWER THAN GROUND ELEVATION
' *** SUMMARY OF SEWER HYDRAULICS
NOTE: THE GIVEN FLOW DEPTH -TO -SEWER SIZE RATIO= .8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEWER MAMHOLE NUMBER SEWER REQUIRED SUGGESTED EXISTING
' ID NUMBER UPSTREAM DNSTREAM SHAPE DIA(RISE) DIA(RISE) DIA(RISE) WIDTH
--__-'----_---ID-NO. ID NO_---___ - (IN)_(FT) (IN) (FT) (IN) (FT) (FT)
1.00 1.00 0.01 ROUND 29.01 30.00 24.00 0.00
' 2.00 2.00 1.00 ROUND 23.14 24.00 0.00 0.00
3.00 3.00 2.00 ROUND 23.14 24.00 0.00 0.00
DIMENSION UNITS FOR ROUND AND ARCH SEWER ARE IN INCHES
DIMENSION UNITS FOR BOX SEWER ARE IN FEET
' REQUIRED DIAMETER WAS DETERMINED BY SEWER HYDRAULIC CAPACITY.
SUGGESTED DIAMETER WAS DETERMINED BY COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE SIZE.
FOR A NEW SEWER, FLOW WAS ANALYZED BY THE SUGGESTED SEWER SIZE; OTHERWISE,
EXISITNG SIZE WAS USED
SEWER DESIGN FLOW NORMAL NORAML CRITIC CRITIC FULL FROUDE COMMENT
ID FLOW 0 FULL Q DEPTH VLCITY DEPTH VLCITY VLCITY NO.
NUMBER CFS CFS FEET FPS FEET FPS FPS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.0 17.0 10.3 2.00 5.43 1.49 6.80 5.43 0.00 V-OK
2.0 11.3 12.5 1.49 4.49 1.20 5.72 3.59 0.66 V-OK
3.0 11.3 12.5 1.49 4.49 1.20 5.72 3.59 0.66 V-OK
' FROUDE NUMBER=O INDICATES THAT A PRESSURED FLOW OCCURS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SEWER SLOPE INVERT ELEVATION BURIED DEPTH COMMENTS
' ID NUMBER UPSTREAM DNSTREAM UPSTREAM DNSTREAM
X (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT)
1.00 0.24 4949.41 4948.95 3.08 1.80 NO
2.00 0.35 4950.71 4949.56 2.96 2.93 OK
3.00 0.35 4950.92 4950.86 2.75 2.81 OK
OK MEANS BURIED DEPTH IS GREATER THAN REQUIRED SOIL COVER OF 2 FEET
' *** SUMMARY OF HYDRAULIC GRADIENT LINE ALONG SEWERS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEWER SEWER SURCHARGED CROWN ELEVATION WATER ELEVATION FLOW
' ID NUMBER LENGTH LENGTH UPSTREAM DNSTREAM UPSTREAM DNSTREAM CONDITION
FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET
1.00 193.04 193.04 4951.41 4950.95 4952.21 4950.95 PRSS'ED
2.00 328.82 328.82 4952.71 4951.56 4953.46 4952.21 PRSSIED
I
PA
'
3.00 18.21
18.21 4952.92 4952.86 4953.56 4953.46
PRSS'ED
PRSS'ED=PRESSURED FLOW;
JUMP=POSSIBLE HYDRAULIC JUMP; SUBCR=SUBCRITICAL
FLOW
'
*** SUMMARY OF ENERGY GRADIENT LINE ALONG SEWERS
---------- -- ------ ---------------------------------------------------------
UPST MANHOLE
SEWER JUNCTURE LOSSES DOWNST
MANHOLE
'
SEWER MANHOLE ENERGY
ID NO ID NO. ELEV FT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FRCTION BEND BEND LATERAL LATERAL MANHOLE
FT K COEF LOSS FT K COEF LOSS FT ID
ENERGY
FT
1.0 1.00 4952.67
1.72 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
4950.95
2.0 2.00 4953.66
0.94 0.25 0.05 0.00 0.00 1.00
4952.67
3.0 3.00 4953.76
0.05 0.25 0.05 0.00 0.00 2.00
4953.66
BEND LOSS =BEND K* FLOWING FULL VHEAD IN SEWER.
LATERAL LOSS= OUTFLOW FULL VHEAD-JCT LOSS K*INFLOW FULL VHEAD
'
FRICTION LOSS=O MEANS IT IS NEGLIGIBLE OR POSSIBLE ERROR DUE TO JUMP.
FRICTION LOSS INCLUDES SEWER INVERT DROP AT MANHOLE
NOTICE: VHEAD DENOTES
THE VELOCITY HEAD OF FULL FLOW CONDITION.
A MINIMUM JUCTION LOSS OF 0.05 FT WOULD BE INTRODUCED UNLESS
LATERAL K=O.
FRICTION LOSS
WAS ESTIMATED BY BACKWATER CURVE COMPUTATIONS.
II
II
L
1
1
I
I
I
I
7
WATER QUALITY PONDS
I
I
I
I
1
II
r
THE
SEAR -BROWN
GROUP
Protect: F+- fOL` Project No. 1$3 -0'q?
By: Checked:
Date: �� g Sheet of
x
- &L
14.1a Ll
o .19
i a . oo
0.TS7
3.01
0.95-
o.--s
L �7b
O
-7-
H U, 39 O • cat a . to
O-;. I.23 0•ZS G,31
4a-1 a.s9 0.95 O,s1�
b.z1 3.55
THE SEAR -BROWN GROUP
FULL -SERVICE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS
FORMERLY RBI), INC.
209 SOUTH MELDRUM
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80521-2603
970.482.5922 FAX:970-482-6368
October 2, 1998
Mr. Basil Hamdon
City of Fort Collins
Utility Services Stormwater
700 Wood Street
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
RE: Amended Final Drainage, Erosion and Storm Water Quality Study for the East
Vine Streets Facility P.U.D. Phase Two Final
Dear Basil:
We are pleased to submit to you, for your review and approval, this Amended Final
Drainage, Erosion and Storm Water Quality Study for the East Vine Streets Facility
P.U.D., Phase One Final. All computations within this addendum have been completed
in compliance with the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria.
We appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing this submittal. Please call if you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
The Sear -Brown Group
Serena Gentry, E.I.T.
jap 0.
Project ngineer
Ictti Q�Nce
��%
UJ Z
a
73
�•'••.....•••6C?� l
Terry
Project Manager
NEW YORK • PENNSYLVANIA
COLORADO•UTAH
STANDARDS IN EXCELLENCE
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Table
Rating Table for Circular Channel
1Project
Description
Project File
cAprogram files\haestad\fmw\fcstree.fm2
Worksheet
basin a
'
Flow Element
Circular Channel
Method
Manning's Formula
Solve For
Discharge
Constant Data
1
Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Channel Slope
0.005000 ft/ft
Diameter
6.00 in
' Minimum Maximum Increment
Depth 0.00 0.50 0.05 ft
Rating Table
Depth
(ft)
Discharge
(cfs)
Velocity
ON
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.01
0.81
0.10
0.03
1.24
0.15
0.08
1.57
'
0.20
0.13
1.82
0.25
0.20
2.02
0.30
0.27
2.17
0.35
0.33
2.26
0.40
0.39
2.30
0.45
0.42
2.27
'
0.50
0.40
2.02
II
09/30/98 FlowMaster v5.13
12:09:12 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1
11
I I
Table
Rating Table for Rectangular Channel
rroiect me
c:Nprogram nies%naestaavmwvcstree.Tmz
Worksheet
basin b
Flow Element
Rectangular Channel
Method
Manning's Formula
Solve For
Discharge
Constant Data
Mannings Coefficient 0.012
Channel Slope 0.004400 ft/ft
Bottom Width 1.50 ft
minimum maximum increment
Depth 0 0.92 0. 10 ft
sting Table
Depth
Discharge
Velocity
(ft)
(cfs)
(ft/s)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.24
1.63
0.20
0.72
2.40
0.30
1.32
2.94
0.40
2.01
3.35
0.50
2.76
3.68
0.60
3.55
3.95
0.70
4.38
4.17
0.80
5.24
4.36
0.90
6.11
4.53
09/30/98 FlowMaster v5.13
' 06:53:21 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1
OF Tables for use with Hydro Pond
Duration (min) 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 100 120 150 180
MOF_\C;
Fort Collins
3.25
2.52
1.83
1.47
1.22
1.04
0.91
0.74
0.61
0.52
0.43
0.39
Greeley
3.62
2.81
2.00
1.64
1.34
1.16
1.04
0.80
0.67
0.58
0.49
0.42
Loveland
3.50
2.70
2.00
1.61
1.35
1.15
1.00
0.80
0.65
0.53
0.43
0.39
5-YEAR:
Greeley
5.19
4.02
2.86
2.35
1.92
1.66
1.49
1.14
0.94
0.80
0.66
0.56
Westminster
4.90
3.90
2.75
2.25
1.90
1.60
1.35
1.15
1.02
0.85
0.74
0.65
10- YEAR:
Fort Collins
5.60
4.40
3.22
2.60
2.18
1.85
1.62
1.30
1.10
0.91
0.75
0.65
Greeley
6.12
4.75
3.38
2.78
2.27
1.96
1.76
1.47
1.20
0.96
0.78
0.67
I..oveland
5.70
4.50
3.35
2.70
2.25
1.95
1.70
1.35
1.15
0.97
0.75
0.65
:t5-YEAR:
i.;reeley
7.31
5.67
4.03
3.22
2.70
2.34
2.10
1.61
1.30
1.14
0.93
0.80
Ioveland
7.15
5.50
4.00
3.30
2.70
2.35
2.05
1.65
1.40
1.20
0.95
0.85
50-YEAR:
Greeley
8.73
6.78
4.81
3.97
3.23
2.80
2.51
1.91
1.58
1.30
1.10
0.92
Ioveland
8.30
6.40
4.65
3.70
3.10
2.65
2.40
1.95
1.70
1.40
1.10
0.95
100-YEAR:
i of t Collins
9.00
7.20
5.18
4.17
3.50
3.00
2.61
2.06
1.70
1.45
1.19
1.05
iDreeley
9.67
7.51
5.34
4.39
3.59
3.10
2.78
2.16
1.79
1.50
1.23
1.05
Loveland
9.40
7.15
5.40
4.35
3.60
3.05
2.70
2.14
1.80
1.60
1.35
1.10
Westminster
9.48
7.32
5.30
4.28
3.60
3.10
2.71
2.15
1.80
1.55
1.29
1.15
11"M Bmwn (;r" nh 24-Sep-98
1.00
Y
0 0.96
U
L
0.92
N
0.88
O
Figure 1. Peak Flow Adjustment Factor
For FAA Method
I'`
Opo=peak outflow from the pond
!
Opi=peak inflow to the pond
1
i i
•i i
r-_-
•. i i
U.UO
W
0.4
Opo/Opi Ratio .
•
0.75
II
---------------------------
DETENTION POND SIZING BY FAA METHOD
Developed by
Civil Eng. Dept., U. of Colorado
Supported by Denver Metro Cities/Counties Pool Fund Study
Denver Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Colorado
USER=Kevin Gingery------------ . ... .....................
EXECUTED ON 09-30-1998 AT TIME 14:53:51
PROJECT TITLE: Fort Collins Streets Facility - Water Quality Pond A
**** DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION
BASIN ID NUMBER = 1.00
BASIN AREA (acre)= 20.36
RUNOFF COEF = 0.86
***** DESIGN RAINFALL STATISTICS
DESIGN RETURN PERIOD (YEARS) = 2.00
INTENSITY (IN/HR) -DURATION (MIN) TABLE IS GIVEN
DURATION 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 100 120 150 180
INTENSITY 3.3 2.5 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4
***** POND OUTFLOW CHARACTERISTICS:
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE = 1.5 CFS
OUTFLOW ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = 1
AVERAGE RELEASE RATE = 1.5 CFS
AVERAGE RELEASE RATE = MAXIMUM RELEASE RATE * ADJUSTMENT FACTOR.
***** COMPUTATION OF POND SIZE
----------------------------
RAINFALL RAINFALL INFLOW
DURATION INTENSITY VOLUME
MINUTE INCH/HR ACRE -FT
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
3.25
0.40
10.00
2.52
0.61
15.00
2.18
0.79
20.00
1.83
0.89
25.00
1.65
1.00
30.00
1.47
1.07
35.00
1.35
1.14
40.00
1.22
1.19
45.00
1.13
1.24
50.00
1.04
1.26
55.00
0.98
1.30
60.00
0.91
1.33
65.00
0.87
1.37
70.00
0.83
1.40
75.00
0.78
1.43
80.00
0.74
1.44
85.00
0.71
1.46
90.00
0.68
1.48
-----------------
OUTFLOW REQUIRED
VOLUME STORAGE
ACRE -FT ACRE -FT
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.38
0.02
0.59
0.03
0.76
0.04
0.85
0.05
0.95
0.06
1.01
0.07
1.07
0.08
1.10
0.09
1.14
0.10
1.16
0.11
1.19
0.12
1.20
0.13
1.24
0.14
1.26
0.15
1.27
0.17
1.27
0.18
1.29
0.19
1.29
95.00
0.64
1.48
0.20
1.29
100.00
0.61
1.48
0.21
1.28
105.00
0.59
1.50
0.22
1.28
110.00
0.57
1.51
0.23
1.28
115.00
0.54
1.52
0.24
1.28
120.00
0.52
1.52
0.25
1.27
-----------------------------------------------------
THE REQUIRED
POND SIZE
= 1.291422 ACRE -FT
THE RAINFALL
DURATION
FOR THE
ABOVE POND
STORAGE= 90 MINUTES
***** GEOMETRIES OF AN
EQUIVALENT CIRCULAR POND
-----------------------------------------------------
STAGE CONTOUR CONTOUR
POND
POND
(DEPTH) DIAMETER
AREA
SIDE SLP
STORAGE
FEET
-----------------------------------------------------
FEET
ACRE
FT/FT
ACRE -FT
0.00
21.06
0.01
110.00
0.00
0.50
131.06
0.31
110.00
0.08
1.00
241.06
1.05
110.00
0.42
1.50
351.06
2.22
110.00
1.24
2.00
461.06
3.83
110.00
2.75
2.50
-----------------------------------------------------
571.06
5.88
110.00
5.18
L
L
II
I I
---------------------------
DETENTION POND SIZING BY FAA METHOD
Developed by
Civil Eng. Dept., U. of Colorado
Supported by Denver Metro Cities/Counties Pool Fund Study
Denver Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Colorado
----------------------------------------------------------------------
USER=Kevin Gingery...........................................................
EXECUTED ON 09-30-1998 AT TIME 15:07:44
PROJECT TITLE: Fort Collins Streets Facility - Water Quality Basin B
**** DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION
BASIN ID NUMBER = 2.00
BASIN AREA (acre)= 6.21
RUNOFF COEF = 0.57
***** DESIGN RAINFALL STATISTICS
DESIGN RETURN PERIOD (YEARS) = 2.00
INTENSITY (IN/HR) -DURATION (MIN) TABLE IS GIVEN
DURATION 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 60 100 120 150 180
INTENSITY 3.3 2.5 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4
***** POND OUTFLOW CHARACTERISTICS:
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE _ .3 CFS
OUTFLOW ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = 1
AVERAGE RELEASE RATE _ .3 CFS
AVERAGE RELEASE RATE = MAXIMUM RELEASE RATE * ADJUSTMENT FACTOR.
***** COMPUTATION OF POND SIZE
-----------------------------------------------------
RAINFALL RAINFALL INFLOW OUTFLOW REQUIRED
DURATION INTENSITY VOLUME VOLUME STORAGE
MINUTE INCH/HR ACRE -FT ACRE -FT ACRE -FT
__ --------------------
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.00 3.25 0.08 0.00 0.08
10.00 2.52 0.12 0.00 0.12
15.00 2.18 0.16 0.01 0.15
20.00 1.83 0.18 0.01 0.17
25.00 1.65 0.20 0.01 0.19
30.00 1.47 0.22 0.01 0.20
35.00 1.35 0.23 0.01 0.22
40.00 1.22 0.24 0.02 0.22
45.00 1.13 0.25 0.02 0.23
50.00 1.04 0.26 0.02 0.23
55.00 0.98 0.26 0.02 0.24
60.00 0.91 0.27 0.02 0.24
65.00 0.87 0.28 0.03 0.25
70.00 0.83 0.26 0.03 0.25
75.00 0.78 0.29 0.03 0.26
80.00 0.74 0.29 0.03 0.26
85.00 0.71 0.30 0.04 0.26
90.00 0.68 0.30 0.04 0.26
95.00
0.64
0.30
0.04
0.26
100.00
0.61
0.30
0.04
0.26
105.00
0.59
0.30
0.04
0.26
110.00
0.57
0.31
0.05
0.26
115.00
0.54
0.31
0.05
0.26
120.00
0.52
0.31
0.05
0.26
-----------------------------------------------------
THE REQUIRED
POND SIZE
_ .2614721 ACRE -FT
THE RAINFALL
DURATION
FOR THE
ABOVE POND
STORAGE= 90 MINUTES
***** GEOMETRIES OF AN
EQUIVALENT CIRCULAR POND
-----------------------------------------------------
STAGE CONTOUR CONTOUR
POND
POND
(DEPTH) DIAMETER
AREA
SIDE SLP
STORAGE
FEET
-----------------------------------------------------
FEET
ACRE
FT/FT
ACRE -FT
0.00
0.00
0.00
87.00
0.00
0.50
87.00
0.14
87.00
0.03
1.00
174.00
0.55
87.00
0.20
1.50
261.00
1.23
87.00
0.65
2.00
348.00
2.18
87.00
1.50
2.50
-----------------------------------------------------
435.00
3.41
87.00
2.90
THE
SEAR -BROWN
GROUP
Project: ' Project No. IS 3 -C)"4
By: S ' Checked:
/
Date: 9 ! C36 g Sheet of
c�U4.a-� +4
Uo L = 1.29 Ac-4+
3so;
5.:2 , 3so
5 s9sa
L L= %3oEA+6 + r4a3
Vo L
76) 99-3 c�
c
4(o, J. U (o Come
Uo L = n. ;z �, 6,C--;-
Ua L -
li
DETENTION POND
I
-I-
1
11
1
1
Table of Contents
'
I. General........................................................................................................................I
A. Location.................................................................................................................. 1
B. Description of Phase 2 Improvements.................................................................... 1
II. Drainage Basins and Sub-basins................................................................................. 1
III. Drainage Facility Design............................................................................................ 1
A. Lot 2 Drainage Improvements................................................................................ 2
'
B. Lot 4B Drainage Improvements.............................................................................. 2
C. Water Quality Ponds............................................................................................... 2
'
D. Detention Pond........................................................................................................ 2
APPENDIX..................................................................................................................... 3
THE
SEAR -BROWN
GROUP
Project: 'F+- (lli'U 3h� El•Project No.
By: Checked:
Date: hp' Sheet of
�- _ -�e� - �c �•� -i a� iJ0 _. i /no -
d
Ant&
C,_
pi-f Oct
29.6
o .sCo
lb. Lol
Q-�
1.23
d.�vl
U.38
415- 1
6.s�i
I,U
o.s9
3 9 3
(�73.9�-
C�.Lo3
Table
' Rating Table for Circular Channel
'Project
Description
Project File cAprogram files\haestad\fmw\fcstree.fm2
'
Worksheet detention outlet
Flow Element Circular Channel
Method Manning's Formula
Solve For Discharge
Constant Data
Mannings Coefficient 0.013
Channel Slope 0.000700 ft/ft
Diameter 18.00 in
Input Data
Minimum Maximum Increment
'
Depth 0.00 1.50 0.10
-77
'Rating
Table
Depth
(ft)
Discharge
(cfs)
Velocity
(ft/s)
0.00
0.00
0.00
'
0.10
0.02
0.49
0.20
0.11
0.76
0.30
0.24
0.97
0.40
0.43
1.14
0.50
0.67
1.29
0.60
0.94
1.42
0.70
- 1.23
1.53
0.80
1.55
1.61
0.90
1.87
1.69
1.00
2.18
1.74
'
1.10
2.47
1.78
1.20
2.72
1.79
1.30
1.40
2.90
2.99
1.78
1.74
1.50
2.78
1.57
1
09/30/98 FlowMaster v5.13
' 12:10:34 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1
----------- -
DETENTION
POND SIZING BY FAA METHOD
Developed by
'
Civil Eng. Dept.,
U. of Colorado
Supported by Denver Metro Cities/Counties Pool Fund Study
Denver Urban Drainage
and Flood Control District, Colorado
------------------
USER=Kevin Gingery...........................................................
EXECUTED ON 09-30-1998 AT
TIME 19:25:21
'
PROJECT TITLE: Fort Collins Street Facility - Detention Pond
**** DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION
'
BASIN ID NUMBER
= 3.00
BASIN AREA (acre)= 37.93
RUNOFF COEF
= 0.63
***** DESIGN RAINFALL STATISTICS
DESIGN RETURN PERIOD (YEARS) = 100.00
INTENSITY (IN/HR) -DURATION (MIN)
TABLE IS
GIVEN
DURATION 5 10 20 30
40 50
60 80 100 120 150 180
INTENSITY 9.0 7.2 5.2 4.2
3.5 3.0
2.6 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.0
***** POND OUTFLOW CHARACTERISTICS:
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE
= 10.5 CFS
'
OUTFLOW ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
= 1
AVERAGE RELEASE RATE
= 10.5 CFS
AVERAGE RELEASE RATE = MAXIMUM RELEASE RATE * ADJUSTMENT FACTOR.
*****
COMPUTATION OF POND SIZE
RAINFALL RAINFALL INFLOW
OUTFLOW
REQUIRED
DURATION INTENSITY VOLUME
VOLUME
STORAGE
MINUTE INCH/HR ACRE -FT
ACRE -FT
ACRE -FT
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
5.00 9.00 1.49
0.07
1.42
10.00 7.20 2.39
0.14
2.24
15.00 6.19 3.08
0.22
2.86
'
20.00 5.18 3.44
0.29
3.15
25.00 4.68 3.88
0.36
3.52
30.00 4.17 4.15
0.43
3.72
35.00 3.84 4.45
0.51
3.95
40.00 3.50 4.65
0.58
4.07
45.00 3.25 4.85
0.65
4.20
50.00 3.00 4.98
0.72
4.26
55.00 2.80 5.12
0.80
4.32
'
60.00 2.61 5.20
0.87
4.33
65.00 2.47 5.33
0.94
4.39
70.00 2.34 5.42
1.01
4.41
75.00 2.20 5.47
1.08
4.39
80.00 2.06 5.47
1.16
4.31
85.00 1.97 5.56
1.23
4.33
90.00 1.88 5.62
1.30
4.31
'
95.00
1.79
5.64
1.37
4.27
100.00
1.70
5.64
1.45
4.20
-----------------------------------------------------
THE REQUIRED POND SIZE
= 4.412304 ACRE -FT
THE RAINFALL DURATION
FOR THE
ABOVE POND
STORAGE= 70 MINUTES
***** GEOMETRIES OF AN
EQUIVALENT CIRCULAR POND
-----------------------------------------------------
STAGE
CONTOUR CONTOUR
POND
POND
(DEPTH)
DIAMETER
AREA
SIDE SLP
STORAGE
FEET
-----------------------------------------------------
FEET
ACRE
FT/FT
ACRE -FT
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
0.00
0.50
100.00
0.18
100.00
0.05
1.00
200.00
0.72
100.00
0.27
1.50
300.00
1.62
100.00
0.86
2.00
400.00
2.88
100.00
1.98
2.50
500.00
4.51
100.00
3.83
3.00
600.00
6.49
100.00
6.58
-----------------------------------------------------
❑0.00
3.83
3
THE
SEAR -BROWN
GROUP
Pro)ect: '• ''�$r CPro)ect No.
By; S Checked:
Date: Sheet of
AMENDED FINAL
DRAINAGE, EROSION AND
STORM WATER QUALITY
STUDY FOR THE EAST VINE
STREETS FACILITY P.U.D.,
PHASE TWO FINAL
I. General
This amendment addresses the changes made in relation to the Final Drainage,
Erosion and Storm Water Quality Study for the East Vine Streets Facility P.U.D.,
Phase One Final Report. This amended final consists of Phase Two improvements
in Lots 1, 2, and 4B. Lot 4 was divided into two lots in a revised plat submitted
by Muller Engineering for the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT).
CDOT will own Lot 4A and have access to the City of Fort Collins' Lot 4B
streets facilities.
A. Location
The site is situate in the North ''/z of Section 12, Township 7 North, Range 69
West of the 6`h Principle Meridian, City of Fort Collins, Larimer County,
Colorado.
A Description of Phase 2 Improvements
Lot 2 improvements include a new parking lot and renovated building. Lot 1
improvements will incorporated a large vehicle covered parking building, a small
building for paint storage and mixing, a vehicle wash bay and various utility
changes. Lot 4B will have a sand/salt storage dome and an ice slicer building.
II. Drainage Basins and Sub -basins
No major drainageway exists on the site. The property being improved lies within ---
the Dry Creek Basin. The site is not impacted by the 100-year flood plain.
Historic drainage patterns on the site are generally west to east. The first phase of
planning included preliminary sub -basin delineation for the entire 32.8 acres. Sub -
basin `H' has more lawn area than was considered in the Phase One Final
Drainage Report. Lot 4B will be paved and Lot 1 remains mostly impervious.
III. Drainage Facility Design
The City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria is being used for the site.
The improvements of this second phase of development stay within the limits
imposed by the preliminary design of the site and construction of the first phase.
The first phase construction included water quality ponds and a detention basin
sized for the complete development of the site. This second phase will complete
the construction of Water Quality Pond `A', the extension of an existing storm
sewer west to drain Lot 413, and other surface drainage features such as cross
pans. The design calculations for runoff and the storm sewer line extension are
attached in the Appendix. The runoff for sub -basin `H' concentrated at Point 1 is
less than what was calculated in the Phase 1 Final Report.
A. Lot 2 Drainage Improvements
Lot 2 is contained within Sub -basin `H'. A two -foot trickle channel will drain the
grass lawn area from the building to the proposed parking lot. Surface runoff
continues to flow along cross pans and curb and gutter in the parking lot. A six-
foot cross pan carries runoff across the paved access area east of the parking lot to
the northeast corner of the pavement. Rain falling in the access road north of the
building and lawn of Lot 2 flows northeast into the proposed curb and gutter, then
east to concentration point 1. A curb break opens to a new four -foot trickle pan in
the water quality pond. The pan will end at an existing outlet pipe to the
detention basin.
B. Lot 4B Drainage Improvements
' The existing 24-inch storm sewer that was stubbed out from the area inlet in Lot 1
will be extended west to convey 2-year storm flows from new area inlets at the
' south corners of Lot 4B. Six-foot cross pans run along the east and west lot lines
to the area inlets. Another cross pan drains the area between the inlets along the
north side of the access road. The sub -basin in the north section of Lot 4B will be
unchanged from historic conditions. An existing swale north of the property
boundary will continue to flow east to the new curb and gutter in Lot 2.
I
1
C. Water Quality Ponds
Water quality pond A currently contains wetlands and therefore is not able to be
regraded. With the development of Lot 4B, the volume of water for a 2-year
storm directed to this basin (1.29 ac-ft) is greater than the current volume of the
water quality pond (1.05 ac-ft) according to calculations by the FAA method.
These calculations included the upsizing of the current 6-inch outlet pipe to a 12-
inch pipe. _However, the emergency weir at the east end of the pond will direct _
any overflow directly to the detention pond.
Water quality pond B is sufficient to handle the volume of water from a 2-year
storm even with the development of Lot 4B.
The calculations for the water quality ponds are located in the Appendix.
D. Detention Pond
The current size of the detention pond is less than what is needed for the volume
of water from the 100-year storm. Therefore, regrading the pond is necessary.
Calculations for the detention pond with the new gradation along with the new
gradation plan are located in the Appendix.
2
I
1
APPENDIX
1
I
1
I
[J
1
I
1
i
I
0
.1
HYDROLOGY
M M M M
The Sear -Brown Group
Fort Collins Streets Facility
Composite Rational Method Runoff Coefficients (Fort Collins)
Designer SLG
Surface
Impervious
I Pervious
C
0.951
0.25
W = i = = = M M
183-047
Basin
Area
Percent
Impervious
PercentRunoff
Pervious
Coefficient
Remarks
Total
Impervious
(ac)
(ac)
C
H 4.36
2.24
51.4%
48.6%
0.61
413-1 0.59
0.59
100.0%
0.0%
0.95
413-2 1.76
1.76
100.0%
0.0%
0.95
46-3 0.79
0.79
100.0%
0.0%
0.95
0-1 3.17
3.17
100.0%
0.0%
0.95
0-2 1.23
0.00
0.0%
100.0%
0.25
7
8
9
10
30-Sep-98
M
M = = = = = = M
The Sear -Brown Group
Fort Collins Streets Facility
Time of Concentration
Designer.
Storm:
Cf =
I
(Fort Collins)
ti = 1.870.1 - C x CflD"(1/2)
SLG S^(1/3)
2 yr
1.00 tc = ti + tL
183-047
SUB -BASIN
DATA
INITIAIJOVE LAND
TIME
TFURECTIME
tc
Remarks
Basin
Area
C
C x Cf
Length
Slope
ti
Length
Slope
Velocity
tL
(ac)
(ft)
N
(min)
(ft)
N
(ft/s)
(min)
(min)
1
2
3
3a
4
5
6
7 7a
8
9
10
11
12
H
4.36
0.61
0.61
60
1.70
6.0
1290
PA
0.50
1.34
16.1
22.0
Lot 2
B-1
0.59
0.95
0.95
180
1.10
3.6
1480
PA
0.50
1.34
18.5
22.1
Lot 4B - North
13-2
1.76
0.95
0.95
190
1.30
3.5
267
PA
0.77
1.67
2.7
6.2
Lot 4B - East
13-3
0.79
0.95
0.95
130
0.77
3.5
250
PA
0.89
1.80
2.3
5.8
Lot 4B - West
0-1
3.17
0.95
0.95
490
0.92
6.4
135
PA
0.89
1.80
1.3
7.6
Lot 4A
0-2
1.23
0.25
0.25
460
0.83
36.3
1925
GW
0.43
1.01
31.8
68.0
North of All Lots
Note: Column 7a codes the channel type for velocity calculations.
PA = Paved Area, PL = Pasture& Lawns, GW = Grassed Waterway
30-Sep-98