HomeMy WebLinkAboutEAST VINE STREETS FACILITY PUD AMENDED ODP AND PHASE 1 FINAL - 30 91B - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSCommun' Planning and Environmental F vices
Planning Department.
City of Fort Collins
March 23, 1993
Mr. Joe Frye
Vaught - Frye Architects
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Dear Joe:
Staff has reviewed the request for East Vine Streets Amended
Overall Development Plan, Lot One, Three, Four, Five, and Tract A
Final P.U.D., and Plat. The following comments are offered:
1. On the plat, the width of the P.R.P.A. easement should be
indicated.
2. On the plat, the approval block should not be for the Planning
Department but rather the Planning and Zoning Board.
3. On the plat, the dedication statement is incomplete.
4. U.S. West has commented that not all telephone cables are
shown on the drawings. Please contact John Hagge for further
information. Also, U.S. West would like to redesign the cable
entrance to coincide with new development.
5. The Public Service Company has commented that there is
currently only one natural gas service line supplying
buildings on this site. This service line feeds a multiple
- - meter header located at the northeast corner of the existing
building on Lot 2. Any proposed building additions t1fat—
result in increased natural gas demand will require that
separate natural gas service lines be installed to each
building by PSCo. Utility easements will have to be provided
on the plat for these service lines since the buildings are
located on separate lots.
6. The sidewalk along Lemay should continue to the south property
line, south of the driveway. For the portion of the sidewalk
along Lemay that is outside the right-of-way,' an easement
should be provided. Generally, a 15 foot wide easement is
granted next to the right-of-way line of arterial streets for
utilities and sidewalks.
7. The Engineering Department requires a Soils Report.
281 North Colle_e Avemie • P.O. 13ox 580 • Fort Collins. CO 805?2-0580 • (303) 221-0750
8. What is the status of the driveway cut on Linden Street
adjacent to the railroad tracks? This driveway is indicated
on both sheet one of four O.D.P. and sheet four of four, Final
Site Plan for Lots 3, 4, and 5. There was discussion that
this driveway would be eliminated at some time in the future.
If so, a note should be added to both sheets indicating future
closure of this driveway due to its proximity to East Vine
Drive.
9. The Poudre Fire Authority requests that the western fire
hydrant be moved an additional two feet from the building and
protected from vehicular damage.
10. The design of the paint storage area must conform to both the
Uniform Building Code and the Fire Code.
il. If. the quantities of hazardous materials exceed the limits for
long term hazardous materials management plan (see enclosed
information), then a Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis may
be required.
12. On sheets one of four and two of four, please correct the
zoning designation from Planned Industrial to Industrial Park.
13. Please indicate the colors of the tube steel picket fence.
14. Please provide information on the sign along Lemay. The
P.U.D. should indicate height, width, pedestal material, and
source of illumination. This information will be the
specification on which the sign permit will be issued. If a
duplicate sign is already in existence, please tell us so we
can take a look.
15.
The P.U.D. should indicate that all perimeter pole mounted and
building mounted light fixtures will be equipped with down
directional luminaries to minimize light spillage, especially
on the east. It is further recommended that security lighting
be—h•igh—pressure sodium -lamps, not mercury vapor: —Light —and
Power is encouraging h.p.s. due to energy efficiency and
because it casts a softer illumination rather than the "bluish
white" of mercury vapor. A specification sheet, if available,
of the light fixtures would help evaluate the impacts of
perimeter security lighting.
16. Because the P.U.D. is a City project, the City Forester has
carefully reviewed the landscape plan. The comments are
extensive and are attached as a separate enclosure.
Discussion of these comments should be addressed to Tim
Buchanan.
17. The approval block for the City Engineer is not needed on the
Overall Development Plan, sheet one of four.
18. The ownership certificate on the O.D.P. should be titled
"Owner" and the attest by the City Clerk should have a
standard notarial block.
19. On sheet two of four, please label the landscaped area south
of the new administration addition.
20. On sheet four of four, please indicate the surface treatment
around the water man facility. Is this gravel or hard
surface? If hard surface, directional arrows should be
painted to channel traffic.
21. The architectural sheet should indicate the materials of the
existing salt storage building.
22. Please indicate the color of the garage doors on the south
elevation.
23. It is recommended that the four windows on the new
construction on the east elevation be treated with arches that
reflect the arches on the existing building's north elevation.
24. With the architectural sheet, and two landscape sheets, and
the plat, the package totals eight sheets. However, the
O.D.P. and the plat will be filed separately. Consequently,
the O.D.P. should be labeled sheet one of one. The plat is
already correctly labeled as sheet one of one. The P.U.D.,
with landscape and architectural sheets, should be labeled a
series of six sheets. This will help after all the sheets are
filed in their respective areas.
This concludes Staff comments at this time. In order to remain on
schedule for the April 26, 1993 Planning and Zoning Board meeting,
please note the following deadlines:
Plan revisions are i
P.M.T.Is. 10 prints,
Final documents are
ue April 8, 1993
colored renderings
due April 22, 1993.
are due April 19, 1993
Please call at your convenience to discuss these comments or to set
up a meeting with the appropriate City representatives.
Since:
Ted Shepard
Senior Planner
xc: Sherry Albertson -Clark, Chief Planner
Kerrie Ashbeck, Civil Engineer
Enc.