HomeMy WebLinkAboutPARAGON POINT PUD PHASE THREE FINAL - 48 91F - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
March 22, 1993
Gerry Horak, Council Liaison
Tom Peterson, Staff Support Liaison
The February 22, 1993 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board was called to order at 6:35
p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Board members present included: Vice Chair Joe Carroll, Jan Cottier, Laurie O'Dell, Bemie
Strom, and Jim Klataske. Member Clements -Cooney joined the meeting at 6:35 p.m.
Staff members present included: Planning Director Tom Peterson, Deputy City Attorney Paul
Eckman, Ted Shepard, Sherry Albertson -Clark, Mike Herzig, Kerrie Ashbeck, Kirsten
Whetstone, Steve Olt, Kayla Ballard and Heidi Phelps.
Identification of citizen participants may be from verbal statements and not necessarily correct,
since some participants did not sign in as requested.
AGENDA REVIEW
Tom Peterson reviewed the Consent Agenda. The Consent Agenda included: Item 1 - Minutes
of the March 22, 1993 meeting; Item 2 - Amigos at Shield PUD - Final, #47-90B; Item 3 -
Bums Ranch at Quail Ridge, Amended, RF Site Plan Review and 2nd Filing - Final, #23-90D;
Item 4 - Paragon Point PUD, Phase III - Final, #48-91F; Item 5 - Sandcreek Village Subdivision
- Final, #1-84E; Item 7 - Amigos at Arbor Plaza PUD - Preliminary, #137-80G; Item 8 - Centre
for Advanced Technology PUD, New Mercer Commons - Final, #53-85AD; Item 9 - Upper
Meadows at Miramont PUD, Second Filing - Final, #54-871; Item 10 - PZ93-4 Easement
Vacation; Item 11 - The Gateway at Harmony Road PUD - One Year Extension of Final
Approval, #1-88C; Item 12 - North Lemay Plaza PUD - One Year Extension of Final Approval,
#57-87B; Item 13 - Modifications of Conditions of Final Approval for Eight Projects; Item 14 -
Manion Annexation and Zoning, #5-93, and; Item 15 - Amendment to Chapter 2 of the City
Code, #17-93.
Mr. Peterson reviewed the Discussion Agenda. The Discussion Agenda included: Item 16 -
ShopKo PUD - Preliminary, #1-93; Item 17 - Impala Village PUD - Preliminary, #6-93; Item
18-Oakridge PUD, Block One - Preliminary, #13-82BB, and; Oakridge PUD, Block One, 1st
Filing - Final, #13-82BC.
Vice Chair Carroll noted that Mr. Peterson had requested that Item 2 of the Consent Agenda be
pulled.
Vice Chair Carroll asked if staff had any other items to pull from the Consent Agenda.
Mr. Peterson said they did not.
P & Z Minutes
March 29, 1993
Page 2
Vice Chair Carroll asked if the Board had any items to pull from the Consent Agenda.
There was no response.
Vice Chair Carroll asked if the public wanted any items pulled from the Consent Agenda.
Ellen Kelly, 806 Bramblebush Lane, requested that Consent Item 5 be pulled.
Tim Arenson, 3020 Blue Leaf Court, Quail Hollow, requested that Consent Item 3 be pulled.
Member O'Dell moved to approve items 1, 4, and 7-15 of the Consent Agenda.
Member Strom seconded the motion.
The motion passed 5-0.
AMIGOS AT SHIELDS PUD - FINAL, #47-90B
Ted Shepard, City Planner, explained that the project had preliminary approval with five
conditions. Mr. Shepard stated that staff had reviewed the conditions and that it was their
opinion that the conditions were satisfied.
Mr. Shepard said that the reason the item was pulled was to modify former Condition
Number 2, by adding the clause: "AND off -site drainage easement". He noted that this
condition was now the only condition attached to approval. The condition now reads:
The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit development final plan upon
the condition that the development agreement, final utility plans, final P.U.D. plans, and
offsite drainage easement for the planned unit development be negotiated between the
developer and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the second monthly
meeting (May 24, 1993) of the Planning and Zoning Board following the meeting at
which this planned unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so
executed, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for
an extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it
shall first find that there exists with respect to said planned unit development final plan
certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which which require the granting
of the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner or
developer of such property and provided that such extension can be granted without
substantial detriment to the public good.