Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPARAGON POINT PUD OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 48 91 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYFOSSIL RIDGE PUD SITE ACCESS STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO SEPTEMBER 1991 ' Prepared for: Byron Collins ' #1 Old Town Square, Suite 301 Fort Collins, CO 80524 ' Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 Banyan Avenue ' Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 303-669-2061 1 1 I 1 1 1 11 1 1 C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Phase 2 I North 30 D.U. �— — —� Phase 1 Access i 30 D.U. Phase 3 iOPEN SPACE 42 D.U. j l ;Soh 30- I Access North H I Access Phase 5 I 43 D.U. -- -. South-- - - - H Access z Q w I Phase 4 36 D.U. I OPEN SPACE I I TRILBY ROAD Q Cr J cc C: CL U a z Z m 1 SITE PLAN Figure 4 lots located adjacent to and south of Phase 2. Access would be provided to Lemay Avenue. Phase 3 is expected to be developed by 1994. Phases 4 and 5 are expected to be developed by 1995. There are 36 dwelling unit lots in Phase 4. Phase 4 is located south of Phase 1 and will enable Southridge Greens Boulevard to be completed as a public street to Trilby Road. When Phase 4 is developed, Trilby Road will be paved from approximately the railroad tracks to Lemay Avenue. Phase 5 will access Lemay Avenue via two streets. Phases 1, 2, 3, and 4 will be single family detached dwelling units. Phase 5 is proposed to be 43 townhouses or somewhat higher density than single family detached. There are 83 lots within the existing Southridge Greens subdivision which were vacant. This traffic study also projected traffic as if these lots were built upon and occupied. These lots would gain access to the street network via Southridge Greens Boulevard. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information, prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers dated 1987, was used to project trips that would be generated by the proposed uses at Fossil Ridge PUD and the completion of the unbuilt lots within Southridge Greens. Table 2 shows the trip generation expected from the various phases of Fossil Ridge PUD. Trip Distribution Two directional distributions of the generated trips were determined for Fossil Ridge PUD. The short range trip distribution replicates the existing travel to/from Southridge Greens subdivision. This is expected to continue through all the development phases of Fossil Ridge PUD. However, in the long range future, more development wil-1 likely occur to the south_of_Fo.s_sil Ridge. This will modify the trip distribution somewhat with the predominant direction of travel being to/from the north. Both trip distributions are shown in Figure 5. Background Traffic Background traffic is defined as the traffic that is and/or will be on the area streets that is not related to the proposed developments. Future analysis years were 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995 (short range) and 2010 (long range). This is a developing area of Fort Collins and, as such, the traffic increases are largely dependent upon development. Background traffic was increased incrementally by 3 percent per year on Lemay Avenue for each of the future analysis years. Traffic on Southridge Greens 4— - i 1co ' SOUTHRIDGE GREENS BLVD. ' W a 1 W J 1 0 SITE TRILBY RD. 1 0 1 z .. Nom. Q N 1 SHORT RANGE N i ' SOUTHRIDGE GREENS BLVD. a 1 a w 1 0 25 10 SITE ' TRILBY RD. a4 1 `o 1 - LONG RANGE 1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Nom. Figure 5 I Boulevard was increased to reflect occupancy of residences on the unbuilt lots. The traffic projections from the North Front Range Regional Transportation Plan, May 1990 and previously completed traffic studies in the area were used to obtain the long range background traffic projections. Figure 6 shows the 1992 peak hour background traffic. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figures 7, 8, 9, and 10 show the short range morning and afternoon peak hour site generated traffic plus background traffic at the key intersections in 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995, respectively. These reflect development of the various phases of Fossil Ridge PUD. Figure 11 shows the long range peak hour assignment of the site generated traffic plus background traffic. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. No new signals are anticipated at any of the key intersections. A signal may be warranted at the Lemay/Trilby intersection in the future, but this warrant would be based upon considerable other development to the south of Trilby Road. Signal Progression Signal progression was not evaluated since no new signals are warranted due to Fossil Ridge PUD. Operations Analysis Capacity analyses were performed on key intersections adjacent to and near Fossil Ridge PUD. Two 1992 (short range) analyses were performed. One included analysis of only the background traffic conditions without the proposed development. The second 1992 operation analysis included the Phase 1 site traffic. Other short range (1993, 1994, and 1995) analyses were performed with the various phases of development. One long range (2010) analysis was performed with the Fossil Ridge PUD traffic and a substantial increase in background traffic. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 6 and the existing geometrics, the key intersections operate in the short range 5 11 r-9 N � r b j� 18/13 SOUTHRIDGE GREENS BLVD. GOLF COURSE AM/PM 1992 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (BACKGROUND AND UNBUILT SOUTHRIDGE GREENS) m Figure 6 REENS BLVD. AM/PM 1992 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ' (BACKGROUND, UNBUILT SOUTHRIDGE GREENS, AND PHASE 1 OF FOSSIL RIDGE P.U.D.) ln� N Figure 7 1 1 1 1� 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 N r- 20/ i4 SOUTHRIDGE GREENS BLVD. .� N �- 10 l 2/ I PHASE 2 NORTH ACCESS AM/PM 1993 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 1 (BACKGROUND, UNBUILT SOUTHRIDGE GREENS, AND PHASES 1 AND 2 OF FOSSIL RIDGE P.U.D.) Q N Figure 8 N z ni ZI/14 2/I SOUTHRIDGE GREENS BLVD. PHASE 2/3 NORTH ACCESS � N � 1 �— 14/ 10 3/z PHASE 2/3 i ze SOUTH ACCESS Ln M AM/PM 1994 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (BACKGROUND, UNBUILT SOUTHRIDGE GREENS, AND PHASES 19 2 AND 3 OF FOSSIL RIDGE P.U.D.) m Figure 9 v I7.5MZ. 20/14 SOUTHRIDGE GREENS BLVD. � N N � � N N r- � � N 13/9 N ^� N N O 5/4 r w > N W _ J PHASE 2/3 NORTH ACCESS PHASE 2/3 SOUTH ACCESS PHASE 5 NORTH ACCESS PHASE 5 SOUTH ACCESS TRILBY RD. le N w a a IQ 10/aZ 15/8 —► AM/PM Wom. 'I/ 2.0 Q N 1995 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (BACKGROUND, UNBUILT SOUTHRIDGE GREENS, Figure 10 AND PHASES 1, 29 3, 4 AND 5 OF FOSSIL RIDGE P.U.D.) 9 �o 0o N 105/ In0 —45/25 f SOUTHRIDGE GREENS BLVD. o � in at 0o N N 5/5 PHASE 2/3 NORTH ACCESS 0 Ln Ln to/lo s/s PHASE 2/3 ( i SOUTH ACCESS 00 0s N N N � 5/5 ' �-5/5 PHASE 5 NORTH ACCESS 1-5/5 PHASE 5 a V ' w �/ SOUTH ACCESS za a I Q N N O O W ' J 5/5. TRILBY RD. � �---170/7 10 10/30� 1130/t50 —� AM/PM VOLUMES ROUNDED UP TO 2010 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC THE NEAREST 5. t (BACKGROUND, UNBUILT SOUTHRIDGE GREENS, Figure 11 AND PHASES 19 29 39 4 AND 5 OF FOSSIL RIDGE P.U.D.) r ' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fossil Ridge PUD is a proposed residential development located east of Lemay Avenue and north of Trilby Road in Fort Collins. This traffic impact study involved the steps of trip generation, trip distribution, trip assignment, capacity analysis, traffic signal warrant analysis, and accident analysis. This study assessed the impacts of Fossil Ridge PUD on the ' short range (at various phases of development) and long range (2010) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: ' - The development of the Fossil Ridge PUD is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development as proposed, ' approximately 1630 trip ends will be generated at this development daily. Current operation at the Lemay/Southridge Greens Boulevard ' intersection is acceptable. Both Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard operate acceptably with the existing two lane cross sections. ' - In the short range future (1992) without the proposed developments, operation will continue to be acceptable at the Lemay/Southridge Greens Boulevard intersection. The two lane segment of Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard will operate acceptably with an increase in background traffic and build out of the vacant lots within the existing Southridge Greens ' development. - In the various short range futures with each proposed phase ' of development, all intersections will operate acceptably. Through 1995, Lemay Avenue should be a two lane street. Auxiliary turn lanes are not warranted at any of the Fossil Ridge PUD street/Lemay or Trilby intersections. - In the long range future (2010), the stop sign controlled-- `- intersections will operate acceptably in the peak hours. Lemay Avenue is recommended to have a four lane arterial cross section. Trilby Road is recommended to have a two lane cross section, but should be further evaluated when other development occurs in this ' area of Fort Collins. With the recommended control and geometrics, the accident rate should be at an acceptable level for typical urban conditions. Chevrons should be considered on the horizontal/vertical curves on Lemay Avenue near the Portner Reservoir. [1 1 I condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The Lemay/Southridge Greens ' Boulevard intersection will continue to operate acceptably during the peak hours. This operation will be similar to the existing operation. Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard will 1 operate acceptably as two lane street segments. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 7, the intersections operate in the 1992 short range condition with the proposed developments as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. With the Phase 1 traffic added to the Lemay/Southridge Greens Boulevard intersection, there will be no change in level of service. The additional traffic is not enough to cause a significant operational change at this intersection. Operation on the two lane segments of Lemay Avenue ' and Southridge Greens Boulevard continues to be acceptable. Improvements to Lemay Avenue are not required at this level of development. 1 Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8, the intersections operate in the 1993 short range condition with the proposed developments as indicated in Table 5. Calculation forms for these ' analyses are provided in Appendix F. With Phase 1 and 2 traffic added to the Lemay/Southridge Greens Boulevard intersection, there will be no change in level of service.. The additional traffic is not enough to cause a significant operational change at this intersection. The Lemay/ Phase 2 North access operation will be acceptable. Operation on the two lane segments of Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard continues to be acceptable. 1 Improvements to Lemay Avenue are not required at this level of development. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9, the intersections operate in the 1994 short range condition with the proposed developments as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix G. With Phases 1, 2, and 3 traffic added to the Lemay/Southridge Greens Boulevard intersection, there will be no change in level of service. The additional traffic is not enough to cause a significant operational ' change at this intersection. The Lemay/Phase 2 and 3 North Access intersection operation and the Lemay/Phase 2 and 3 South Access intersection operation will be acceptable. Operation on the two 1 lane segments of Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard continues to be acceptable. Improvements to Lemay Avenue are not required at this level of development. ' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 10, the key intersections operate in the 1995 short range future conditions as indicated in Table 7. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix H. All the stop sign controlled intersections along Lemay Avenue and the Trilby/Phase 4 access intersection operate acceptably. With their two lane cross sections, Lemay Table 3 1992 Peak Hour Operation With Buildout of Southridge Greens Intersection AM Lemay/Southridge Greens Blvd. WB LT A WB RT WBLT/RT A A SB LT A Table 4 1992 Peak Hour Operation With Buildout of Southridge Greens and Phase 1 of Fossil Ridge PUD Intersection AM Lemay/Southridge Greens Blvd. WB LT A WB RT WBLT/RT A A SB LT A PM B A A A PM B A A A Table 5 1993 Peak Hour Operation With Buildout of Southridge Greens and Phases 1 and 2 of Fossil Ridge PUD Intersection Lemay/Southridge Greens Blvd. WB LT WB RT WBLT/RT SB LT Lemay/Phase 2 North Access ' WB LT WB RT WBLT/RT SB LT AM PM A C A A A A A A A A A A A A Table 6 1994 Peak Hour Operation With Buildout of Southridge Greens and Phases 1, 2, and 3 of Fossil Ridge PUD l Intersection Lemay/Southridge Greens Blvd. WB LT WB RT WBLT/RT SB—LT-" _ - Lemay/Phase 2 and 3 North Access WB LT WB RT WBLT/RT SB LT Lemay/Phase 2 and 3 South Access WB LT WB RT WBLT/RT SB LT AM A A A A A A A A A A A M C A A A - A A A A A A A J Table 7 1995 Peak Hour Operation With Buildout of Southridge Greeds and Phases 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of Fossil Ridge PUD Intersection Lemay/Southridge Greens Blvd. WB LT WB RT WBLT/RT SB LT Lemay/Phase 2 and 3 North Access WB LT WB RT WBLT/RT SB LT Lemay/Phase 2 and 3 South Access WB LT WB RT WBLT/RT SB LT Lemay/Phase 5 North Access WB LT WB RT WBLT/RT SB LT Lemay/Phase 5 South Access WB LT WB RT WBLT/RT SB LT -1 T-r-i-l-by-/P.hase 4-Access - SB LT/RT EB LT AM PM A C A A A A A A A B A A A A A A A B A A A A A A A B A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard continue to operate acceptably. Based upon criteria from "Intersection Channelization Design Guide," NCHRP 279, TRB 1985, auxiliary right -turn and left - turn lanes are not required along Lemay Avenue or along Trilby Road. The existing two lane cross section on Lemay Avenue is adequate through the 1995 short range future. When the Phase 4 access is connected to Trilby Road, Trilby Road should be paved to a two lane cross section with shoulders from the railroad to Lemay Avenue. The Lemay/Trilby intersection should be controlled by stop signs on Trilby Road. Using, the traffic volumes shown in Figure 11,, the key intersections operate in the long range future conditions as indicated in Table 8. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix I. At this level of background traffic, Lemay Avenue should be widened to a standard arterial cross section. The arterial cross section is four travel lanes and a center left -turn lane at appropriate intersections. Provision of painted left -turn lanes at all of the streets along Lemay Avenue would provide a storage area for turning vehicles from Lemay Avenue. With the significant increase in background traffic, the stop sign controlled intersections will operate acceptably. Delays to left - turn exits from minor streets will increase. This is common at stop sign controlled intersections along arterial streets. The two lane cross section on Trilby Road, east of Lemay, will function acceptably. As other property to the south of Trilby Road and to the east of the railroad tracks develops, this cross section should be evaluated further. Accidents The recommended geometry and roadway cross sections at the various phases of development should minimize vehicle conflicts and maximize vehicle separation. The horizontal curves on Lemay Avenue near the Portner Reservoir is signed with reverse curve signs. It is recommended that chevrons also be considered_ since the horizontal curves are also on vertical curves. IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of Fossil Ridge PUD on the short range (at various phases of development) and long range (2010) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: - The development of the Fossil.Ridge PUD is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development as proposed, approximately 1630 trip ends will be generated at this development daily. I Table 8 2010 Peak Hour Operation With Buildout of Southridge Greens and Phases 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of Fossil Ridge PUD Intersection AM PM Lemay/Southridge Greens Blvd. WB LT C D WB RT WBLT/RT A A A B SB LT A A Lemay/Phase 2 and 3 North Access WB LT B C WB RT WBLT/RT A A A A SB LT A A Lemay/Phase 2 and 3 South Access WB LT B C WB RT WBLT/RT A A A A SB LT A A Lemay/Phase 5 North Access WB LT B B WB RT WBLT/RT A A A A SB LT A A Lemay/Phase 5 South Access WB LT B B WB RT WBLT/RT A A A A SB LT A A Trilby/Phase 4 Access SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A - Current operation at the Lemay/Southridge Greens Boulevard intersection is acceptable. Both Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard operate acceptably with the existing two lane cross sections. - In the short range future (1992) without the proposed 1 developments, operation will continue to be acceptable at the Lemay/Southridge Greens Boulevard intersection. The two lane segment of Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard will ' operate acceptably with an increase in background traffic and build out of the vacant lots within the existing Southridge Greens development. - In the various short range futures with each proposed phase of development, all intersections will operate acceptably. Through 1995, Lemay Avenue should be a two lane street. Auxiliary turn lanes are not warranted at any of the Fossil Ridge PUD street/Lemay or Trilby intersections. - In the long range future (2010), the stop sign controlled ' ec interstions will operate acceptably in the peak hours. Lemay Avenue is recommended to have a four lane arterial cross section. Trilby Road is recommended to have a two lane cross section, but should be further evaluated when other development occurs in this area of Fort Collins. P I - With the recommended control and geometrics, the accident rate should be at an acceptable level for typical urban conditions. Chevrons should be considered on the horizontal/vertical curves on Lemay Avenue near the Portner Reservoir. 8 APPENDIX A MLATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE 'L.OVELAND, CO 805M i I TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE- COUNTS Observer bate q Z 4 [ pay wt es DA? City Fo rZf G©� �- I �� g R = Right turn Se GzJ s ` V S = Straight INTERSECTION OF LE.a p`/ �QyE/�y�� qNp vfK2so .� L =Lett turn i TIME BEGINS L Rn A V �-IL>tif A TOTAL North South S C Is, TOTAL East WestALL TOTAL tmm NORTH from SOUTH from EAST from WEST R I S I L Total R ;S I L I Total I R I S I L I Total II R I S L I Total I 715 I Iz5 4 29 l0 74 734- II 6 3 1119 1 1 4- 1 Z3 11 1 1 1 730 11 .121s 3 31 45 1 1 4(0 11 7 -7 1191 1 1 1 zv 11 1 I I II zo 11 9.7, -745- II 1zCP (D 13Z I o 43 1 1 43 11 75 117.91 1( 13s11 I 1 1 I 3 1if Sro0 II 12s 9 1 34 10 1 39 1 1 39 II -73 11111 Iz 1 15 11 1 1 I 1 q II 9Z i I t I I II I I I I I I II I �1s$�sl 46 4 Z-L I I Z. 611 t We I I It(n Zllz$ 8 41 1131 9 71 1 1 1 1 9 II 38 S I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I II II I I I II I I I I II -=. I II i I I I I I I I I II I I i I I I I I II 4-30 l 0 114 1 -74- 10 JZT I 12s II 99 tZ I I Z I 14, 11 1 I 1 1r 4 I r1 3 446 14- 17- -7(a 11Z 44-1 14(p 1112z il101 13 1 13 1 1 I1 1 5-00 11 16'7111 1 cD$ I ass 1 14-0 11 10$ I Is 1 1 3 1 1 a I 1_ I I 11 11 1 z(o 51' I sq z8 1 g7 0 ¢1 1 14`1 111 Z 8 11 7 1 L 1 I I 9 1 137 1 i 1 1 I I =TI I I I I 4�0-53o k4a &5 305 14- 14`3I I1SZ I¢s 7 1144I I(UI S 4II I 54 S J I I MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Observer Date g Day%"1jesDAY City �'oe T eofdj S R = Right turn S = Straight /1U INTERSECTION OF r I Sr r( C2t;i�+��. t`=t_ v AND C �" L = Left tum TIME BEGINS TOTAL North South TOTAL East West TOTAL ALL from NORTH from SOUTH from EAST. from WEST R S I L Total R I S I L I Total ( R I S I L I Total ( R I S L I Total I 71-57 l01 3 1 3 II Is 10 o f 0 I o it "6' 730 I01 3 3 1 4 I0 14- II -7 II I I If Z4s 110 1 3 3 1 2 I° i II t1 I I I I ° goo II ° 1 3 1 3 I co l o 110 I l 0 l 0 it 6 1 9 I I I I I II I I I I I I II I z�s-�Isll0 (tZ I fZ II z3 l o l 23 II a 5 I I I II t l o f I II t 1 3� I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I it I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I I II • .. ^TelKO=. 4yryq l...Y 4_. ^ 4mQ A� �II I.m..' �' �.G' —_—.��_— �(� L` cw�li+ .:•ice✓. —•. �'.1�R� ��� I, {���� II I I I I I II I I I I I I II I I i I I I I I I I II I I II I I I i I I I II 4-3o 0141 4 II 31©I 3 II I I I I II11 0l II I 44-1 III I I 1 II S I0Is II I I I In lol o o II 5-00, 11 14 I 1111 Io l 1 it 1111 sis to I� II li of 119 I I I I to loin � II 4 I I I I I I I II I I I I I I i II 43v-53o 11 t I i--I I I t s 11 1 114 10 I 1 4 11 3 z 111 1 1 11 z ° 1 z l z II 3 4- I I. INTRODUCTION This traffic impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, ' and control requirements at and near a proposed development known as Fossil Ridge PUD in Fort Collins, Colorado. It is a residential subdivision comprised of single family detached dwelling units and townhouse dwelling units. It is proposed to be developed in a five phase program over a 4-5 year development period. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planning consultant (Jim Sell Design), Byron Collins (developer). the Fort Collins Planning Department, and the Fort Collins Transportation Division. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Traffic Impact Study Guidelines. The study involved the following steps: Collect physical, traffic, and development data; Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; Determine peak hour traffic volumes and daily traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections and roadway sections; Analyze signal warrants; - Analyze potential changes in accidents and safety considerations. ' This report is prepared for the following purposes: Evaluate the existing conditions at key intersections and roadway segments; Estimate the trip generation by the proposed developments; Determine the trip distribution of site generated traffic; Evaluate operation at key intersections and roadway segments; - Determine the geometrics at key intersections; - Determine --the -impacts of -site generated tra-f f i c—on—key intersections. ' Information used in this report was obtained from the City of Fort Collins, the planning consultant, the developer, research sources (ITE, TRB, etc.), Western Management (for existing Southridge Greens development), and field reconnaissance. ' II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of Fossil Ridge PUD is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions ' be presented. NIATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Observer Date l Z DayT '-s DA y City P i2 `oor- f— rah R =Right turn n S = Straight INTERSECTION OF L IVt f�V Xi vC; �.� u c ` AND �"� '� `^ `% '� ' L = Left turn TIME BEGINS LC—'�vt N Y � G.c,r �3 y TOTAL South G. C. TOTAL West TOTAL' ALL from NORTH from SOUTH from EAST from WEST R I S L Total I R I $ 1 L 1 Total R I S I L I Total Il R S L 1 Total I -I i s II i 4- 1 4 1 3 1 I 1 3 It - I o I 0 l o I 1 I -7 3 0 11 I 3 3 1 1 I I t II 4- II 1 I l z II I I II I Co 4 1 d It i I t II 5 III I 10 I I I I I II II s `EQb II I IZ I Z II0 I l 0 o I to t o II I i I II II Z II I II I I II I I I I i i I II I �,"-�tsll I t3 t3 IIS I I S II +� II I I t I z I I I II ZD II I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I II II I I II I I II I I I I I I I II 177 1 1 1 1 II 11 1 1 I11I I II II II ► II ► I II I I I I I I I I II 1 1 I II I I I II I I I I I 43oI I to I 10 116 i t a II to s l 10 1 5 445 I tI -7 -7 IZI 1012 I I I I 1 9 sao II I 4 1 a l I I t o II /� I t2 1 1 3 1 15 I I I I 11 II ►9 s15' I I 3 1 3 l i l I I I 1 4.- 11101 13I 13 11 1-7 I I I i I I I II i I I I i II -2-4-1 z a- Ill I I I 1 11 Z5 z 91 16 13 5- 11 1 1 1 11I& o 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1985 HCM: UNSIONALIZED INTERSECTIONS I Face-1 f;t Ait�'AY".f:AatfY;Y'Y,Y"Ytaa iaAtAt a.wil:l Y:RIYYYf'�Y'1'<v YY:v. f.AY; Y. .f a. f, f.Y:'a :\ Y'Y'.a. Y. Y::Yv IDENTIFYING INFORMATION i AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET_. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... southridge grlens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)------ 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. pm om 92 93'94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND --------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------------------- ------------- E3 WB NE SB ____ ____ LEFT -- 13 ____ ---- 0 22 THRU -- 0 161 104 RIGHT -- 84 1 0 I NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______ _______ CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE gage -a --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY J-PACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (D�ph) _ tpcph) c (pcph) - = c - v LOS t p M SY. R SH ________________________ ________________________ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 16 555 545 545 529 A RIGHT 103 E?° 835 835 732 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 27 957 957 957 930 A. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----- --- ------ - ------------ --------- ----- ------- --- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southridq preen- blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 4/2G./91 ; am pm 92 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... ^--� I �� u 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION'S raa ax a.r:a'casxra r r:«:. r:«xrcra. aa:xa r: v: v.r .a:r «rs r. r:c>•<rars a:r vc cx«cr wr. «.«.r v::«a:a IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------- I ---------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... southridge greens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am (wmi 92 9394 95 OTHER INFORMATION ---- INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ES WB N5 SR ---- ---- LEFT -- 10 0 65 i T HRU -- 0 143 240 RIGHT -- 44 4 0 I NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------1------------------ EE. W, N=:. SE' I _s------- --- -------------,-- LAO CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE --------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v ( p cph) � (pcph) C (pcph) p M MINOR STREET W8 LEFT 12 PIGHT 54 MAJOR STREET SR LEFT 79 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 423 402 848 846 963 963 ------------------------------ SH A.R ED RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY c (acph) c = `. - v LOS SH k SH ------------------------ --- 402 390 848 794 963 333 A NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southridge greens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemav OAT= AND TIME OF THE ANALYSTS.._.. 9/25/21 ; am Pm 92 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1935 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ) 31 XYXY'X'Y. XXYY )'X iYXk'kXX'YY':Y #XY'YYXYXX"X YKXYYYXXXXY X:KXXXX)XYX W.X YX:1'. ): Y'.M FACILITY LOC"T10N_... 1=may :'NAL YST.. .... nid TIM^ OF ANAL YSIr;..... am Prn 92 93 94 f" DATE OF ANALYSIS..... "3/27 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0' PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH)-------------------------- 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1' OiRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN)..-------- 66 34 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER, WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6' PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------ ROLLING TERRAIN E = E f f f LOS 7 b R w d HV --- - --- ----- ----- A 4 �.1 1 ----- 01 ----- .94 B 5 :_4 3.9 1 .,1 .93 C i:.4 3.9 1 -91 .93 D 3-3 91 .93 5 2.9 I :; C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------ INPUi VOLUME(vch_): 371 ACTUAL `LOW RATE: 371 SERVICE 103 FLOW RATE V/C ------------ ----- A 168 07 E. 44E19 C 26 �5 D 1__ 52 1935 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS tX ¢ YX1"k: k'Y.X k: k'XXi: -aX XXYY. KY)"X X'WX 4kYRX): k:'X.tXkXtW XX Y.XXYk'X'.X YYkXXX)XXYk'.YX. FACILITY LOCATION...- lemav ANALYST .............. mj' TIME OF ANALYSIS... am DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 9i=�/91 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2010 C✓ A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ----------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCK,S........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES------------------------- 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH). ......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN?.......... 39 / 61 LANE WIDTH r17)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT-) --- 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ----------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E = f f f LOS T 6 P w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- A 4 3 3.2 ----- 1 ----- .94 ----- .94 B 5.04 .93 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .94 -93 0 5 2.9 ,.3 1 .94 .93 E 5 =., .,-., 1 .94 .S_ C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ----------------------------------------------------- I NP?;T VOLUME (voh) : 49' ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 497 S'ERViCE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --' --------- ----- 0 4 e. C 848 5 Lp<: FO:, e.1 VEN CONDiT1pN _.: c m m m m m m 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS a xrx%YK FrvYxrxxrxxx«xYx«%K%%Yx%rxrzY%x%Kxrxxrxx rv%YYzrxxxKKx%a. FACILITY LOCATIC)tl . south:9da_ Green - ANALYST .............. mid TIME OF ANALYSIS..... 5 4 9O��/2/91DATE OF ANALYSIS.... OTHER INFORMATION._.. 2010 ' A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS '___.-___ ----------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUE:_ ........................ 01 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0' PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0' DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 20 / 80 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT-) ... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------ ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS. T B R w d HV ___ _____ _____ _____ _____ A 4 .3.2 1 _____ .83 ----- 1 B 5 3.4 3.9 1 .83 1 C 5 3.4 3-9 1 .83 1 D 5 2.9 3.3 .83 1 E 5 2.9 8?. 11 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------ INPUT VOLUME(vph): 120 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 120 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C - ------ ----- -A16_ B 442 .19 C 81? = Cl 120E E 2138 .92 LOS 'OF: I I VEW COND i T 1 ON 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS «YY.xK%Y'Y:"YtY.Ya.KZKxKxxYY z".FYzzzYYYY.z%%YY>zzY.Y%YZ:«,z xY'W xzxxKr: X.Y.Fz a.zY FACILITY LOCATION.... southrl�-ae Green=. ANALYST .............. mid TIME OF ANALYSIS..... amQ Q 92 9:, 94 95 DATE OF ANA.LYSIS..... 9/z /_I OTHER INFORMATION_... 2010 L=� A.) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ----__________--_-------______ _______________________ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 0 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES. ........................ 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES ......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) ---------- 56 / 44 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ----_---______________________ _____________________ ROLLING TERRAIN E E f IF f LOS T B R w d HV ___ ---_ _ Q_, .Z _ 1 _____ .96 _____ 1 ' B 5 3.4 3.9 1 .96 1 C 5 .4 8.9 1 .96 1 D 5 2.9 1 .96 1 .. 2.9 "..s 1 .96 1 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INr'UT VOLUME(vph): 123 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 123 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C _A_ ____'Se__ __07_ B 51 tY C 9eS D L0S FOR GI V=rt CONDi'!vN -. C �.(�Y4�►., ul� (lk13�1�.�� �(211�(31f1 t (�uLi ' UIJ;�,�IJIJr_1L1z1;;(1 ,l(�,�1(3E3El;IIUIJg L-evrl-rrf tttzrvire rr-iterin Nil- unsiallali^ed intersbc- tlons nt I+ rAntr?d in very tltal►tel-nl tr?r-rnst mild nrt+ related to tlr.11rl At Or,] my rnntlr.tt. Niel ysI s, for n stop- or ' ylrld-tunLrallr-d 1.nferarr_Lion results ill solutions for the tttpnci tv of each I snn tit the rill nor nl)pronclres. llte level -of -service r_'AL•erIm are titer based on the reserve, M- Ultusedt tapntity of the lane in question, e>tpret3snnl in pasrertger cnra per- Ilnul- if UTA1 . ' NE5ENVE Chl'YICIIY LEVt:.1. UI- EXrEC1EU UELf1Y IU I'fa'l 1) 5C IW I I.;1 F•1 l Wult 5 I NEE I t fiG1f F i C --------.....----------------------------------------------- ?�I11!1 n Little or no delay Short traffir- delays nverattta traffic delays lU!►--.I'?'? I) Long Ernf f i c delays ' Very Iona Ere ffIt delays K r- ' Kblhrn drmnnd vo!!uite hticr.rrds I -lit, cnpcity of the lane, t?:I1: C-7llt? Ilolays will Ill, t'llroutltt?red with tlLlellilla t•IlIIth ill ny tnrt!tt? 5Pvvr't) tolluotil:I t.tll A f I er 1 1 lit] uther-_ tr If I I c nlnvnm0111:n ili-lllr. 7til:erser.l.iull. Ibis tnndition usually warrml►Ls ilnproventtyl►L to tl►r iltter'settian. 1 ' liefc�l encr.r (,11.y1_Ititly 1,%1?.c�rl,ly (I�7Llu�l,.. 1:>vr:.cfal Ilepor-t ..^_lIt?. II•mns1j)or l:ml:,1on fiese-it-clt Pont- dt Watlt,rl- nl (iRrC3nrtll CouoicI I. waslIInatent U.C. ' 17HS. APPENDIX D 1 1 1 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL —OF —SE -.VICE 1985 HCM: UNSIGNA.LIZED INTERSECTIONS Yv: /R Y: I.YYRLYR. V V: V"F Y:v RFV: Y:t'F.F FI. V'V Y�Y.Y"v'V V. Y.F V: v; 7 >: "Y:t_t'V'YYY Page-1 F"Y Fv::Y Y; YY'1:4.Fvr:RYR ------ I POTEN- ACTUAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION i � F! OW- T]AL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE- -���--'----- - RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (Pcph) : (pcph) - (Pcph) c = c - v LOS AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 p M ------------ SH R SH ------------ --- PEAK HOUR FACTOR-"------------------- -9 --------------- --------- MINOR STREET AREA POPULATION ................. ..... 80000 WB LEFT 22 536 522 522 500 A NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.-------- southridge greens blvd i RIGHT 146 826 626 S26 680 ! NAME OF THE NORTIH SOUTH STREET-...... lemay MAJOR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST------------------ mid SB LEFT 42 953 953 953 912 A DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)""-"-" 9/25i91 I TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am Pa, 92 93 94 95 IDENTIFYING 1----S-0N OTHER INFORMATION .-.. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Vj NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.----- southridgc greens blvd INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET--.. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS ..-.- lemay ////���� 9/25/91 am pn1 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION..". INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR. STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH 1� CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -________________`_____________L_______________________-___________ _„ WD NB ____ ____ ____ ____ LEFT -- 16 0 34 i IRU -- 0 166 107 RIGHT 0 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------------- --`c--- — ---------------- i WE'. NE _I I ------- _______ _______ LAfdE= _______ head /J bi ;R .01 =-T. �H 0% Em 1Btu4' U:�j LU BM4954 I M m U L-i'll IDDHEIE01 ...... J"AD S T 17 UNIVER IT JULA Hosp .11MA If . 91033 ml , " Gravel — Pit BB . . . .so. . . . . . . . . Radio Towers T eat ZZ 23o 119 A PO ---I . L it P rakes J L Willi Is Ul HM4874 ka A I 2r 2611— Res 3 1 0 2 '\ " I s o I � " Y%./. 27 tl ------------ F Omega ----------- 081? vz' '0 j )�h" v 0 � , -4 35, 36 499/ 5� 332 Mc Clellatid. Ytl 01, armony ol: Cem o cc 'o •50 R 3 2 5000 916 D17CH 4916 f, 12 ht* FOSSIL A,IDGE A P.0 13� Q. it Trilby 4923 P 4880 13 '065 \L1, 0 18 17 15 16 Pvck 5024 SITE LOCATION Figure � ri■ r r■ �i r � � r � r � � �i■ � ■si r r 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paoe-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION! ...................... 80000 i NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... southridge cgeens bled NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST_ ................ mid ; DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm .r1911 9- 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND --------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTIONI: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN - I TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- ES W5 NB SB --- --- LEFT -- IS --- ---- 0 106 THRU -- 0 152 247 RIGHT -- 68 10 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- r. WE, piB SE, ------- La.Nt -- -------------- _ ------- 9 CAP -.CITY AND --------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pane-_� POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) (pcph) c = - v LOS ------- p -------- M --------------------- 54 R SH ------------ --- MINOR STREET WE LEFT 16 384 350 350 334 RIGHT 83 840 840 840 757 MAJOR. STREET 58 LEFT 130 957 957 957 828 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southridge greens b)vd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... iemay /� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIE:_ .... 9/25' 9 ; am / m N 93 94 95 OTHER. INFORMATION.... I 1935 HCM TWO-LANE HIGHWAY_ it r.X XXYXXXXXXXXx:XXXXYXXXSXXX X.XXY.YXXYYXXXXX YXXXXXXXX xx.vrzXXXrYXXX:cr FACILITY LOCATION'.... lemay ANALYST .............. mid TIME OF ANALYSIS..... am :m S1 St S_ 94 95 DATE OF ANALYSIS..._. 9127191 OTHER INFORMATIO,;.... 2010 Q V A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ----------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS_ --- ................. 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0' PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 01 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1' DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 67 / 3c LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ----------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS w HV ----- -_-T ----- --- ----- ----- A 4 3.2 1 - ----- .91 .94 6 5 3.4 3.9 1 .91 .93 C 5 4 ;.9 U 5 2.5 3.3 E = 2.9 C LEVEL OF ' FRVIC= RESULTS --------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(voh): 42F ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 428 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C -_- ________ ----- A 161 0? ,I 446 1 c' 32. _ _ 2153 I LOS FO:: f l-`•rEN C'UN'Di T ION E'- m m = = m w m = m 1935 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS Y:"X:KXYYYX.fi XYXYXYXX<Y.M XXYYY'XXYXXtXXWXXXYYXX t:KY KXXYXYX.X XYXX!{".Y YXYitX FACILITY LOCATION._. lemay ANALYST .............. mjd TIME OF ANALYSIS..... aa, orn 91 92 9'. 94 e5 DATE OF ANALYSIS--- . 9i 7/91 OTHER INFORMATION---- 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS i— _____________________________________________________________ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES------------------------- 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP;DOWN).......... 38 / 62 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 6) CORRECTION FACTORS _____________________________________________________________ ROLLING TERRAIN E EE f f f LOS - T B F( w d HV ----- --- A ----- ----- ---- 4 0 _, . 2 ----- ---- 1 .93 .94 B 5 3.4 3.9 1 .93 .93 C 5 1. 4 3. 9 1 _ 93 . 93 0 5 2.9 S.3 1 .93 .93 E 5 2.S _..� "i .93 .9> C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ________________________________________________ INPUT VDI_UME(vPh): 57 ACTUAL FLOW PATE: 573 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V;C ----- ___ A _________ 1'Z .07 Fn;; r_]V`N CON,i TInN �: C 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE H CHWAYS - 1985 HlM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS F'K zzAF %.X l4 F'XXXZFFX%v X}'KXXFFFFZZXF%:KFFZX%Fs:AFX}FFFY.%XIXFX%YXYtX'F}'%T'z X:t t'z A:k }.T ZYFX'.ZXXX: Y. A't:KX}1}}XXYF.\.T%:tYXz%XtiFXX%%X%%}.FFYF X:K tYYXZ FACILITY LOCATION.... seu2hridge greens FACP_ITY LOCATION'.... southridge graen_ ANALYST .............. mJd 9' 92 93 94 95 ANALYST-------------- mJd TIME OF ANALYSIS----- am cm 9�1J °3 CIA 95 TIME OF ANALYSIS...-. an. om DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 9/ a /91 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... /27/91 OTHER INFORMATION..-- 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _________`__-_______________________________________________. ._____________________________________________ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCK........- . ........... . . .. Cl PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 0 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES------------------------- 0 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES-----.-.----- ..........- PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH).......................... 50 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 1 PEAK: HOUR FACTOR............................ 1 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ---------------- - - DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN)---------- ------- 21 / 79 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN)---------- 64 / 36 LANE WIDTH (FT) ...... ..... ..... .. .. .. 12 LANE WIDTH (FT) ....... .------ --- -- USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG- WIDTH IN - - .. FT.)..- 1"[ 6 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES.................... 50 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS B) CORRECTION FACTORS ----------------- --------------------------------------- ------------------- -------- -------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN ROLLING' TERRAIN E E E f f 'HV E E E `w LOS T B R w d LOS B ^n ___ _____ _____ _____ _____ d _____ _____ HV _-_ _____ _____ ____ _____ J A 4 3 2 1 _____ 84 _____ 1 A 4 3.2 1 -92 1 6 5 3.4 3.9 1 .84 1 B 5 S.4 S.9 1 -92 1 C 5 3.4 1.9 1 .84 1 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .92 1 O 5 2.9 _... 1 _84 1 U 5 2.0 3.3 E 5 2.9 _ _., 1 . 84 1 E 5 2.9.92 1 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- I NPUT VOLUME(vphi): 176 INPUT VOLUME vph): 197 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 176 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 197 SERVICE SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C LOS FLOW RATE V/C ___ _________ _____ ___--____--- ___-_ A 164 .07 I00 -01 B 445 .IC B 439 -10 C 810 .35 c 902 35 . =I54 -92 E ... 70 .92 !n_; FOI; _'I VE.b COHDiT]OK!_: I LO_. FO;, �'JVEt: CON C''ii0''!_: . I 1 I F] APPENDIX E t z I CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE pac--_ 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALI=) INTERSECTIONS f'aoe-1 _____________________________________ ________________________________ zr xrxxvw r.r rx:r xx xs x.<xx< ».r.�:v:rvxrv: v: rx xxxv:xxxrxrr:rx r. zr< rr e::e �rxrr.v r r.<rv:.:xr POTEN- ACTUAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION FLOW_ TI--.L MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE ------------------------------------------ ___________________________ RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (ocph) c (pcph) _ (pcph) 'SH c = A - v LOS AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 p M R SH --- PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 ' _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ MINOR STREET ARE=. POPULATION ...................... 60000 WB LEFT 24 531 515 515 491 A NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... southridae arleens blvd I RIGHT 169 827 827 827 659 _ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... )emay MAJOR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd i I SB LEFT 48 953 953 953 905 A DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm'/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm Sot 93 94 95 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION OTHER INFORMATION_... NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.....- southridae greens, bled INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE DATE AND TIMEE H/SOUTH STREET.... OF THE ANALYSIS..... lemay 9/25/91 zrti pm o93 94 95 INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION OTHER INFORMATION_... MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EE WB NE SE ---- LEFT -- 20 0 sS i THRU -- 0 166 107 j RIGHT -- 13C 4 0 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------------ ___________________________ E6 WC'. LSE SE ______________ _______ LANEc 1985 HCM: !WSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pace-1 2.4FKY.:K v'.KY:Y'Y v'2YXv 2v.11v.K2:S a:Yf .v:2 .K2 Y:Y2iKY:I.:I:YY v:v 1:FYF2titY v; f.2 v:Av:Y: 'v: F. 1,i 1'Y f. CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pa9e-C IDENTIFYING INFORMATION POTEN- ACTUAL ------------------------------------ ----------4-------------- - FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET_ 40 � MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (P-= hl c (pcph) A� (pcph) = c - v LOS ' p M SH k SH PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 i ------- ------- ------- ----------- ----- ----- --- AREA POPULATION---------------------- £0000 MINOR STREET NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... southrid9e 5r'eens blvd WS LEFT 11 371 331 331 314 RIGHT 95 639 639 839 743 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay ' MAJOR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd ! SS LEFT 150 956 956 956 806 A DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/ddjyy)...--. 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 92 93'94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---- INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southridae yr=eens blvd _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS----- 9/25/91 am pm 92 93 94 95 INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION OTHER INFORMATION.._. MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------- ----------- EB WE, NB SB ____ ____ ____ ____ LEFT -- 14 0 125 THRU -- 0 152 247 RIGHT -- 76 12 0 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------- ---------------------------- . Et, WE 1 -------------- ------- LANES -- ------- 1 r r s a ion mom M ,m 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS xxxxxxxx».xx»sxxxv:.»x..x:c*»:x xxxx:xa»xxxxxxxxxvxxxxsxx FACILITY LOCATION.... lemay ANALYST .............. mid TIME OF ANALYSIS... am Pm 91 O 93 94 95 DATE OF ANA.LYSIS..... 9/27/91 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2010 i A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS __ -----------------------------------.___--- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ c PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 01 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 68 / 32 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 . USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG_ WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------ ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f r LOS B R w d HV _____ _____ _____ A _ -.2 _____ 1 _____ .9 ----- .94 E 5 2.9 c._ 1 .9 _9c; C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------ INPUT VOLUME(vPh): 450 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 450 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C _? 166 .07 E: 44 .1S C 1? 05 V1: _ E 'I4, 92 LOS =O.R GIVE:,' CONDITION'=: C r 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS x»'xxY_x-f:YYY'x lxY'.xXFt#YYYY iv'x YxYxXFxx »'xxxXxY�»'Yxx»xXxxtLXxxxxY»»KX FACILITY LOCATION.... lemay ANALYST .............. mjd TIME OF ANALYSIS..... all Prn 91 O 9c 94 95 DATE OF ANALYSIS_.... 9/� /91 OTHER INFORMATION—. 2010 .A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ----------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCES ............. .......... 2 PERCENTAGE OF EUS.................. .......... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) -------- .. 38 / 62 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ----------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E c E f f LOS T e R w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- A 4 3 3.2 ----- ----- 1 .93 ----- .94 8 I „_4 3.9 1 .93 .93 C 5 .4 3.9 1 .S3 .93 D 5 '__9 3.3 .. .93 .93 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ----------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 600 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 600 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --- --------- ----- 1?2 .07 K 45S. ? C 344 LOS FOB: LIVEN CONDITIONS: C m a AM an In 1935 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS ;sxx%KxssrsxrFxxmsxsr sxxxssssiirixrxzXiXisisx K.r:r.K YxY rx xx r%. FACILITY LOCATION.... southridge greens. ANALYST .............. mid TIME 0= ANALYSIS. ..._ Q cm 91 O 9C 94 45 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... OTHER INFORMA.TION.... 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ________________________________________________�______ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 01 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 WEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 11 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 21 / 79 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12� USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50) B) CORRECTION FACTORS -�- ---- --------------- ---- ------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN " E E f �T f f LOS B R w d HVI ____- ___ _____ _____ ____ A 4 ----- 5 5 e..a ;.9 1 .34 1� - C 5 S.4 3.9 1 -84 1 0 5 2.9 __C 1 _84 1 E 5 2.9 _._ .84 1 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------ INPUT VOLUME(vch): 201 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 201 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C ___ _________- A 164 C7 E. 445 .14 C 619 _ FOR r-IVEN COND1 T ION 1955 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS XX"M:FXY:A 2YxiiFF;x*iY.YX'r'Cx XY"FY:;FKY.i%:%YYX'X YXSSFFSFF.l IYF;.X;XSx:KXi X:1.; FAC:L,TY LOC=.TION.... sou:hridge greens ANALYST .............. m_id -. TIME OF AN-LYEIS..... aro & 91 94 95 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 4/c;/91 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2010 .A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS __________________ _____________________________ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 0 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) .......... 59 / 41 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 8) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------- ROLLINC= TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV __ A _ ----- ----- 8 5 3-4 3.9 1 .95 1 C .95 1 D 5 2.4 .95 1 E 5 2.9 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vch): -27 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 22' SERVICE LOS. FLOW RATE V/-C ------------ ----- A 125 .07 50� lc >4° ^o LOS FOi: (:iVEN COt.Li-,IUh'SB APPENDIX F 1 1 = w M M am as r M r M M M M M M M M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 t ttWv;.ti.'Y;Yt t. v. Y:ttKYvlWt\M'V: Y::\.. v:Mv;\: Y.X v.'.Y ]: Y.Y. Y:t 1.WYYtY". Y.YY, •MY: \:MY A.iYY v,MiYYtY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION_ .................. 80000 i NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... southridge areens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. a pm 9E 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------------------- E8. W: NP. S: --- ---- LEFT -- 20 0 39 THRU -- 0 183 115 RIGHT -- 13P, 4 0 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------I________ ` -------------- ---tic-- 1 LANES ------- 1 CAPACITY AND ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT - v(pcph) c (ccph) c (pcph) c (Pcph) c = c - V LOS p M SH R SH MINORSTREET I WE LEFT 24 505 490 490 465 RIGHT i 169 804 804 804 636 MAJOR STREET i SB LEFT 48 934 934 934 366 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southridge greens blvd ---- NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 am pm S20 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily vacant, commercial or residential. Residential and commercial uses exist on the north side of Fossil Ridge PUD. The commercial use is the Southridge Greens Golf Course. The residential use is the single family development that was and is being built in connection to the Southridge Greens Golf Course. Railroad tracks are on the east side of the proposed subdivision. Land to the south across County Road 34 (Trilby Road extended) is vacant. Land to the west is vacant (future Portner Reservoir Park), or residential (partial development of Brittany Knolls). Land in the area is rolling. The center of Fort Collins lies to the north of this proposed subdivision. Roads The primary streets near the Fossil Ridge PUD are shown in Figure 2. Lemay Avenue is west of the project. It is a north - south street designated as an arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. In this area, between Southridge Greens Boulevard and County Road 34, it has a two lane cross section with auxiliary turn lanes at some intersections. Lemay Avenue is planned to have a four lane cross section in the future with auxiliary turn lanes at appropriate locations. Intersections along Lemay Avenue are stop sign controlled with Lemay Avenue having the right of way. There is a signal at the Lemay/Harmony intersection approximately 1.2 miles north of Southridge Greens Golf Course. The posted speed limit is 40 mph. Trilby Road borders Fossil Ridge PUD to the south. Adjacent to the proposed development, it is a two lane gravel road. West of Lemay Avenue, Trilby Road is paved at varying widths, but -functions-as-a- two --- la-ne--street. There is a signal at the College/ Trilby intersection. Trilby Road has stop sign control at Lemay Avenue. The posted speed limit is 30 mph west of Lemay Avenue. I I Southridge Greens Boulevard is a subdivision street that functions as a collector street, serving the residential area around and through Southridge Golf Course. It intersects with Lemay Avenue at a stop sign controlled T intersection. It has a median separating the oversized travel lanes for the westernmost 2500 feet. There are auxiliary left -turn lanes along the medianized segment. Southridge Greens Boulevard ends in a cul-de- sac approximately 0.9 miles east of Lemay Avenue. The posted speed limit is 25 mph., -- 2_ I = M = M it mi M M M M M M w M M M r 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 xrv:ssr»:xxr»rrv:rrv:s+.sxx:»xsssti•.r rxsxrs�:s:rxx»:xxv'r.r srzv:.iv v:xs v.sxrrsrv. »: ». ».».. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 j PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 1 AREA POPULATION.. -------------------- 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET --------- southridge . greens bled NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay I NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9125191 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 92 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOL!TH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WE• NE: SE'. ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 14 0 12_ THRU -- 0 157 271 RIGHT -- 78 12 0 NUMBER OF LANES ES We. NE• se. --- ------- LANE' -- _ CAPACITY ANO --------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pane-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(ocph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = - - v LO_-. p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 17 252 315 315 298 C RIGHT 95 833 833 833 738 MAJOR STREET SS LEFT 150 953 953 953 803 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southridge greens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay ��'"�� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/15/91 ; arti 92143�94 95 OTHER INFORMA.TION.... prti 03 M M M Mao M r �w r r � � � � �■r � � r 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALI2ED INTERSECTIONS Raae-1 >Y KY Y.It\Y'Y MY Y:-XkkX>KX KCY.X KY'X KxY'K LKiY'XYY:YIY:KYY:YtY:Y 11K#F�XX XY:X Y.YVYYTY.1 iK Y.'XX IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION--------------- ---- -- 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... phase 2 ' NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay 1 NAME OF THE ANALYST. ------- ...... — mid � DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)--- .-. 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 8 pm 9S 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN i TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------ EB W5 NE SE ---- ---- ---- --- ' LEFT -- 2 0 5 i 0 178 116 ! RIGHT -- 17 1 0 44 1 NUMBER OF LANES ____________________________________________________________ es. NF. SE: ---EE W -- ------- ------------- LAN'E5 -- 1 - .1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paae-3 --------------- ----- -------- ------- ----------------------------- ?OTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (ocph) c (pcph) c (peph) C = c - v LOS o M SH R SH _______________ ______________________________ _ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT I Saa 542 RIGHT 21 816 816 MAJOR. STREET SE. LEFT 6 948 948 > 542 > 540 > > 775 >'51 >A > 816 > 795 > A 948 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------ ------------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ------ phase 2 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.._. lemay � DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 :� om19'194 95 OTHER INFORMATION..._ L�....) 941 A w M M M 1985 HCM: UNSIG'NALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pace-1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-' M: Y. M. Y'.ti:K%":K }KMXXF X:KXY):: YC!"t.Y,r.:KY.Y.TKCIK Y. V'Y. �: R.%<.Y <:KYXYYtt•KI F.Y. Y.<KY. 1.t M..<A: Y: Y:ti Y'.tY.' ____________________________________________ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION POTEN- ACTUAL --------------------------------------------- ---------------- . FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 MOVEMENT v(pcph) C. (Pcph) c 1pcph) (Pooh) � _ - - v LOS A � p M SH k SH PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 _______ ________ _____________________ ____________ --- AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 ( MINOR STREET NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... phase 2 F WB LEFT 1 465 459 > 459 > 458 > > 605 > 791 >A NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay I RIGHT 12 870 370 > 870 > 858 > A. NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid MAJOR STREET DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 S8 LEFT 21 975 975 975 954 A TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. ................ am Go94 95 I OTHER INFORMATION.... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------------------------------- ______________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREci...... plhase NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STP.EET ... . iemay INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 am pm 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SE ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT -- 1 0 17 THRU -- 0 129 249 RIGHT -- 10 2 0 NUMBER OF LANES E6 W8. NE: S6 LANES -- 1 - M M M M M M M r M M r M M w M M M M 198E HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS -.,..��Fx a»xcxwx�FFxzxx+x cxxx�v:�x»:r�>.x x>x�>rxxFxxxxFar�t x.:sxzx x FACILITY LOCATION_... lemay ANALYST .............. mid TIME OF ANALYSIS.. ..... am prn 91 92 93 94 95 DATE OF ANALYSIS...-. s/27/91 OTHER. INFORMATION.... 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ----- __________________________________________!_____ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2I PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0l DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR -------------------------- -- 1i DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 68 J 32 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6: PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) COR.RECTION FACTORS ----------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV __- _____ _____ _____ _____ A 4 _ 31.2 1 _____ -9 _____ -95 B 5 3.4 3.9 1 .9 .93 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .9 .93 D 5 2-9 I C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ----------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 480 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 480 SERVICE _OS FLOW RATE V/C IF6 07 E, 443 .19 C 817 .35 D 121 Z, 52 _ 2147 LOi FOf-' @IVE(: CONDITIONS C' 1935 HCM!TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION.... temay ANALYST .............. mid TIME OF ANALYSIS..... am PIT 91 92 O 94 95 DATE OF ANALYSIS...... OTHER INFORMATION...- ?010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _____________________________________________________________ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ------------ ------------- 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .............. ............. 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN)---------- 37 / 63 LANE WIDTH (FT) ----- ----------- - - -- --- ---- 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ___ ______________________________________________ ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d _____ HV ----- ___ _____ _____ _____ _____ A 4 _, 3-2 1 -93 .94 B 5 3.4 3.9 1 .93 -93 C 5 3.4 3.9 i .93 -93 D 2-9 a.- 1 .93 .S3 E 5 .9 :..3 1 .93 .98 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ____________________________________________________________. INPUT VOLUME(vph): 629 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 62^- SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C _a- --------- ____---_- u'_ E, 455 .19 C 839 D 1 --06 _ rl _. -- OFG I Vt r.' 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX G m = m m m m 1985 HCM: UNSICNALIZED INTERSECTIONS I Page-i i <zn.axe:,c<:ez.e.nr..xx>r.r xva.xw_<.c_<�n:»a:.:r.�vc rr r. u.r.a xa'tivr>r<rcr ar ix x.rv»: a IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 i NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... southridge greens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 0 om 92 93194 /95 �/ OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NE SE, ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 20 0 39 THRU -- 0 211 125 RIGHT -- 138 4 0 NUMBER OF LANES ---E6-----W---------- ------- LANES -- _ 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p MR SH ------- ---- -- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 24 479 464 464 439 RIGHT 169 782 782 782 613 MAJOR STREET SE LEFT 48 909 909 909 852 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME Or THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southridge greens b7vd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 am pm 92 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS c'a ge-1 Y:Xti}Y:Y Y.'X>A A'?'K.K ]'V YYRYYVX).♦ kA'KY.V.Ft'A<Y..A.Y.Y.YK>K'✓t:f !'l'�:>'CZtYXM:4.t 1"Y:<YK1:lA�A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE PUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 I NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... southridge greens Blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST.. ................ mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 92 9 3095 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ES WE: NB SEA ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 14 0 123 THRU -- 0 185 302 RIGHT -- 76 12 0 NUMBER OF LANES ' ----------------------------------------- ____________________________ I W5 NB SE. _______ _______ ______________ CAPACITY AND -- ---------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL -OF -SERVICE PaaF-3 -- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE i RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcc-h) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) 2 = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 17 319 264 294 267 C RIGHT 95 903 803 803 706 MAJOR STREET i S6. LEFT 150 929 929 929 778 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southridge greens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SUUTH STREET_... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 ; am 92 93 9a 5 OTHER INFORMATION_... M M M M M M M M = r = = = = = = r 1935 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS j Page-1 K<YXV"KXK:Y##.YYf:K.YX#:CY:KKX##V:Y}eiK2t<.K:K##V:XY.W./VK#.<V: Y:K Y, IT X#YY4M#XXX#XXY:I:Y IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------f---------__------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 1 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 I f AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 i NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET--------- phase 2/3 north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid ' DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)------ 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. (am) m Pm 93(�) 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 2 0 ' 7 THRU -- 0 197 124 RIGHT -- 21 1 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------- ----------------------- EE' WE E -- ------------- ------ LANE_-. --i --- i I CAPACITY AND LEVE_-OF-SERVICE Paoe-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcoh) c (pcph) c (pcoh) - (ocph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 2 519 516 > 516 > 513 > > 761 > 733 >A RIGHT 26 797 797 > 797 > 771 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 9 928 926 928 919 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase 2/S north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 am pm 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION..-. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1935 HCM: UNSIGNALiZEO IhT a'ECTIONS I Paae-1 CAPACITY AND IE��� LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pa e-3 9 zzzxz:«xz«xxxz«zzzz«««»zzxx zzxxcxxzv:»xxr xzx:zxx ..»z v:c x xxz xxzaxxzv ------ _______________________________________________________________ ' IDENTIFYING INFORMATION POTEN- ACTUAL • FLOW- TI'L MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET- . 40 MOVEMENT v(Pcph) c (Pcph) c (PCPh) c (pcoh) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 1 ------- ----- — - -------- ------------ ----------- --- AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 j MINGP. STREET NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... phase 2/3 north WE LEFT 1 426 e1B > 418 > 417 > > 790 > 771 >r NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ------- lemay RIGHT 17 843 643 > 843 > 826 % A NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid MAJOR STREET DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 SS LEFT 29 961 961 961 932 A TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am B93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL IDENTIFYING _____________________________________________________________________ INFORMATION _____________________________________________________ _. __ _______ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... Phase 2/3 north INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION NAME OF THE DATE AND TIME NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... OF THE ANALYSIS..... lemay 9/25/S1 ;.am pm 93 94 95 MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH OTHER INFORMATION..._ CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WE: NE SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 1 0 24 THRU -- 0 153 273 RIGHT -- 14 2 0 NUMBER OF LANES E WE'. NE SE ------- ------ ----- ------ LANE_ -- 1 i m m = M = smi i M = a = M = = = = = M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - Paae-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR. STREET.- 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. .................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET --------- phase l 2/3 south I NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... )emay 1 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid i DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).----- 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. ................ am pm 939 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES E6 WB NS SE ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT THRU -- 0 184 121 RIGHT -- 14 1 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WE'. NB c_ ---------------------------- LANES -- 1 i 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paae-3 --------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) C (pcoh) c (Pop") c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH -------------- --------- ------------ ----------- --- STREET WB LEFT 4 534 532 > 532 > 529 > > 741 > 721 >A RIGHT 17 810 810 > 810 > 792 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 942 942 942 936 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase 2/;'. south NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... ;/'5/91 am pm 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... I I I 1 I I I I D I -I-- I I I 1 PRIMARY STREETS Figure 2 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 XXXK>KkX.XXI •YKf:�':K1�X �'K1XX K.4X:K.KX<YXYY'KXX is;YK'K K.<Y,i RX F. 'M :K X.I: Y: K.KZX.K tXXXXY'. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------'---------- ----- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET_- 40 i PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 i AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 I NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... phase 2/3 south NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 93 9 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------- ------- -------------------- ----- ------- EB WE NE SE. - ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 16 THRU -- 0 145 258 RIGHT -- 10 _ 0 NUMBER OF LANES ` -------------------------------------------------------------------- F5-__W_-_ _-_- ------- LANES I CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (peDh) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 2 448 442 RIGHT 12 852 852 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 20 965 965 > 442 > 440 > > 736 > 723 >A > 852 > 839 > A 965 946 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _______________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase 2/3 south NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 ; am pm 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.._. am = = M 1935 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS Y F 1.'AYX-.K Y1:Y tK i'1 Y1'Y.'> I:-.K .F't k vv'KX). Y.'X'Y :K Ki-X iKKYXY Xx MXM Kt�Y YY. k"ix FY: %' Yt1:K%Y Y'M FACILITY LOCATION.... lemay ANALYST.. ............ mid TIME OF ANALYSIS..... ar. pm91 92 9S 94 95 r f DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 'S/27/91 1 OTHER INFORMAT'ON---- 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 11` i _____________________________________________________________ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 � DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 68 / 32 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12, USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING 20NES.................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ---------------------------- ------ ----------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T E R w d HV I-__. _____ _____ _____ _____ A 4 3 3.2 1 _____ .9 _____ .94 8 5 3.4 3.9 1 .9 .93 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .S .931 D 5 2.9 3.3 c' S 2.9.9 .93 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------`------------ INPUT VOLUME(voh): 513 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 513 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C ____________ 156 .07 B 443 .19 C 817 D 21 E =.47 .92 LOS FOR GIVEN CONUITION.- 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS. w>.a:.....mzmzz.cxs....... z........ .............aax.......... FACILITY LOCATION.... lemay ANALYST .............. mid TIME OF ANALYS.IS...... am pin 91 92. S3 94 Sj DATE OF ANALYSIS..... •_; _;/91 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2010 i A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _____________________________________________________________ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ......................... 2 PERCENTAGE OF E"SES------------------------- 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR---------------------------- 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 36 / 62 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 S) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E f �R f f LOS B w d HV __- ___ _ _____ _____ A 4 Z �.2 1 _____ .9; ----- .94 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .93 .93 0 5 2.9 -.3 1 .93 .93 E 5 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------- ---------------------------------- --- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 53S ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 688 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V;C A. 1, 2 .0.' 6 458 .19 - i LOS. FOn• CSIVEN CONOIT TON_: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX W M min M s M w M M M M M M M M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paoe-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------- ----------------- -------------- ---- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR. STREET.. 4C PEAK. HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 ' AREA POPULATION ...................... s0000 I NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET --------- southridge Greens bled I NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... -iemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 ! TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 92 93 94 O OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ____________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WE. NB SB _ ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 20 a 36 THRU -- 0 248 138 RIGHT -- 128 4 0 j NUMBER OF LANES 1 __________________________________________ EDW -- __ ___B__ ___--__ __---_- LANES. CAPACITY AND -------------------------------------------------- LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcoh) c (occh) c (pcph) v LOS --- . ------- _F M SH ___r____ R MINOR STREET j WS LEFT 24 445 432 432 A07)A A RIGHT 156 746 '46 746 589 MAJOR STREET SE LEFT 44 869 869 869 825 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southridge greens blvd _____ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS_.... 9/25/91 , am pm 92 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... M M w== M = = M= s 1985 HCM: UNSIGNA P ED INTERSECTIONS Paae-1 rvx rrxrz rx xxv zxx-sxr<zz.rxx*rr a:z c: xxxx<xtz rx:.�zrxxxx': x.- xasxxv IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 1 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 30000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET --------- southridae 1 areens blvd 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..___. 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 92 93'94 G OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES E6 W. NS SE LEFT -- 14 0 1 c THRU -- 0 -09 344 RIGHT -- 12 -1 ' NUMBER. OF LANES c ---M1 '__--- ---WE-- {I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVJC- _______________________*aQe__ POTFN- ACTUAL FLOW- TI _ MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY C-PACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(p Kph) c (Pcph) c (pcp^) _ (pcph) c = c - v LC; p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 17 286 256 256 232,M (' RIGHT 88 780 760 760 692 "1JOR STREET S5 LEFT 139 903 903 903 753 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------- 7------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southridae greens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... temay DATE AND TIME OF THE AN='_YSIS..... 9/2S/0 1 ; am am 92 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.._. M = = M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS F'ao e-1 Y'; IYY:Y 4titiX1.K Y'i'YY V: X' Yti'K_V:l."X KitXXYY M-KXYY.iYV_Y�eVrV:.i'�_t'.k�A�XX'KXXL#YYY}�; Y.x v. V.a IDENTIFYING INFORMAifOfJ AVERAGE PUNNING SPEED, MAJO:=: STREET.- 40 I PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 I AREA POPULAT I Of ....................... 80000 ; NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET-.------- phase 2/S nort� 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay j NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid r DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yY).----- 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 93 94 O OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES __________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 7 THRU -- 0 237 139 RIGHT -- 19 1 0 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------------- EE. WE, NB SB _______ ______________ L AW-S _______ i, CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERV.CE - Paae_3 II POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIA:L MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 474 471 > 411 > 465 > t > 673 > 643 >A RIGHT 23 758 758 > 758 > 735 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 9 884 884 884 876 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase 2/3 north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... iemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 am pm 93 94 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIC!NS Paae-1 YiKXt.YXYYY'.i'i.FTXiTi: i;a %.i.Y. i.FX t.X%izY:%%% .%]:%1.YX 't%X %:1:%%iXX}Xl.%Y Y.Y y.YYY: Y:Y IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING' SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 60000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET --------- phase 2/3 north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mmidd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 93 am (5 94 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUME- EE W6 NP, --- --- --- ---- LEFT -- 2 0 ?"< THRU -- 0 180 SIB RIGHT -- i3 4 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- ------- A,NEY CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pape-"c --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- 4.CTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CA.PAC i TY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(ccph) c (pcph) c (pcch) c (pcph) - = r_ - v LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT ? 375 368 j RIGHT 16 812 812 ! MAJOR STREET SS LEFT 27 943 943 > 368 > 366 > B > 700 > 681 >A 612 > 796 > A 943 916 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------- NAME -------------------------------------------------- OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase'?/3 north NAME DATE OF THE AND TIME NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... OF THE ANALYSIS..... iemay 9*25/91 ; am prt 9; 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1 m m m r m m_ m m m m m m r m m m m m 19°.5 HCM: UNSICNA.LIZED 'INTERSECTIONS I F'a ue-1 M1MM#YMtMtt#MMMYMMM<1#tM?:MMX'#tiXtM4#:NY:#YMM M'r<M#.Y:MMM'K til#Y'YMM#?:MM Y.#KY#.I::kM IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------- --- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION. ----------------_ - S0000 ! NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... phase 2/3 scuth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ---- -.. lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd I DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)-.---- 9/15/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 8Pm 93 94 0 OTHER INFORMATION.._. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION .MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EE; WE, NE SE ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 7 0 4 THRU -- 0 225 140 RIGHT -- 13 ? 0 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------- EB WE NE ------- ----- - LAHES -- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paae-3. ----- --------------------- ------ ---------------------- -------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- -1141 MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(_cph) c (ocph) c (ocph) c (pcph) c = I - v LOS p M SH R SH ------ ------- ------- --------- ------------ -- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 9 434 462 > 462 > 474 > > 63? > 612 >A. RIGHT 16 769 769 > 769 > 753 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 5 896 896 896 891 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase '/"; south ----- NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... iemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 am om 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... M M= s r M M M M M M M 1935 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... phase 2/3 south 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay 1 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid ' i DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).... _. 9/15/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION... - INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN I TRAFFIC VOLUME°. ----------------------------------------------------- EE WE NB SE, ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 0 14 THRU -- 0 175 606 RIGHT -- 9 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------- LANE= Page-1 v.w�xx<zx*.>sr CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE cape --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M !SH R SH MINOR STREET WE LEFT 4 392 388 > 388 > 385 > > 640 - 625 >A RIGHT 11 817 817 > 817 > 806 > A MAJOR STREET ' SB LEFT 17 947 947 947 930 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase 2/3 south NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 ; am om 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... r m m r i M 1985 HCM: UNSIONALIZED INTERSECTIONS IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --- -------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 i NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ---- ..... phase 5 north! NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 3/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ .(D pm 93 9 4 ` ) OTHER INFORMATION_... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _ WB NB SE. ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 1 0 1 THRU -- 0 219 146 RIGHT -- 8 1 0 NUMBER OF LANES------------------------------------------- 11 FD Wt NE SB 1 _______ _______ _______ LANIES -- 1 Page-1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-' m wzx�xxxx�:xxr--- _----------- ------------------------------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (Pcph) c = c - V LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 1 486 486 > 486 > 485 > > 727 116 >A RIGHT 10. 775 775 > 775 > 766 > A MAJOR STREET SE, LEFT 1 904 904 904 903 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION - ____________________________________________________________________ ------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase 5 north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET_... Temay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9!1'25/91 am PM 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... I I ' Existing Traffic ' Daily traffic flow at the Lemay/Trilby intersection is shown in Figure 3. These are machine counted volumes conducted by the City of Fort Collins in 1991. Peak hour turning movements at the Lemay/Southridge Greens Boulevard and Lemay/Golf Course access intersections were obtained in September 1991 and are also shown in Figure 3. Raw traffic count data is provided in Appendix A. ' Breakdown of the daily traffic counts indicates that the peak traffic hours occur between 7:00 AM and 8:30 AM, and between 4:30 PM and 6:00 PM. Existing Operation ' The Lemay/Southridge Greens Boulevard intersection was evaluated regarding operational efficiency. It was evaluated using the existing control and existing geometrics. The peak hour operation in shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. Appendix C describes level of service for unsignalized intersections from the 1985 Highway Capacityt9anual. The Lemay/ ' Southridge Greens Boulevard intersection operates acceptably. All movements at the intersection are at level of service A except for the minor street left turns which are at level of service B during the afternoon peak hour. However, when combined with the right turns,, the overall operation is at level of service A. Both Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard operate 1 acceptably with the existing number of lanes, terrain, and peak hour traffic conditions. Lemay Avenue operates at level of service B and C during the morning and afternoon peak hours, respectively. This operation occurs in the segment where traffic volumes are the highest and the terrain is most severe. Operation on Southridge Greens Boulevard is at level of service A during both peal: hours. This occurs between Lemay Avenue and Front Nine Drive, where the volumes are the highest and the terrain is the most severe. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Fossil Ridge PUD is a residential development located east of Lemay Avenue and north of Trilby Road in Fort Collins. Figure 4 shows a schematic of the site plan of Fossil Ridge indicating the proposed phasing of the project. It is expected that Phase 1 would occur in 1992 with public access via existing Southridge Greens Boulevard. Emergency only access would be provided from Trilby Road via a "road base" road with locked gates to prevent general public access. Phase 1 consists of 30 single family detached ' dwelling units. Phase 2 is comprised of 30 dwelling unit_ lots with access to Lemay Avenue. Emergency vehicle access would be provided via a "road base" road through Phase 3. Phase 2 is projected to be developed by 1993. Phase 3 is comprised of 42 dwelling unit 3 r 1935 'HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paae-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION i ------------------------------------------ --------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 i PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 I AREA POPULATION 80000 � NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... phase 5 north) NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am 9 93 9 SS OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP.SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------- _________________________________________________ EB WB NE. SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 1 0 8 THP.0 -- 0 176 301 RIGHT -- 4 1 0 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------------- EB WB N S: _______ ______________ _____ CAPACITY AND LEVEL_Oc_SERVICE F'a9e-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH F SH _______ ________ _____________________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 1 401 399 > 399 > 397 > > 676 > 670 >A RIGHT 5 818 816 > 818 > 813 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 10 949 949 949 939 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase 5 north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... iemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 ; am e9S 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... M M M M M M M! M M M M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS XY:XKY.%X.:A XYY%%'C=:X.%tiY.Y:Y:KY:XY.1>.KK%:%:K C Y)'%X. 1'l: X'YY:X RKKYYtFY �% IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... phase 5 south, NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid , DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).----- 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. pm 93 8 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 c a9e-1--------------------------------------- ------------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE "---"'--------- RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (Pcph) c (Pcph) c (ocph) c = c. - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 2 490 490 > 490 > 487 > P > 667 > 659 >A RIGHT 6 780 780 > 780 > 774 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 1 909 909 909 908 A ---------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------- ES WE NB ---- -- ---- LEFT -- THRU -- 0 214 RIGHT -- 5 1 NUMBER. OF LANES ---------------------------- EE WE, ------- ------ LANES -- 1 0 ---------------------- NB ------- SIR ------- IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------ ------------------- -- =-- ---------- - _ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase 5 south -' NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET_... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS._... 9/25/91 am pm 93 94 95 OTHER INFORMATION_... i 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paae-3 2YY.Y'C>YYM1X.KT:Z1.'Yti.KM"F�)YY:Y"-KF.Y.X'[t: Y',{V:YIXXY'1 Y: 1: Y.Y;t"X1ZX 1!>,YY (KKFYX-Y 41'}____________________________________ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ' POTEN- .ACTUAL --------- ----------------- ---------------_.------------------ - -N- 4HARED RESERVE AVERAGE RIINNINE SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 i AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 i NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... phase 5 South, NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. i mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am 93 94 95 pm OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------- ---------------------- -------- ------------ -- -- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ES WE, NE; SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 1 0 THRU -- 0 175 297 RIGHT -- 2 9 0 NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------------------------------------- --E--- ------- ---- -- ------- LANES: -- 1 1 :LOW- TIAL MOVE Mc i <-L RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET i WB LEFT 1 406 405 RIGHT 2 818 818 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 949 949 > 405 > 404 > > 611 > 607 >A > 818 > 816 > A 949 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION —-------------------------------------- --------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... phase 5 south NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 ; am pm 93 94 Sj OTHER INFORMATION_... 943 A u WIN WE m NO ON ■ 1985 HCM: UNSIC=NALIZED INTERSECTIONS x x.xxxcxxxv: r; x.« c r.♦xvxxx. x.x r: r:r xxxxxx x. r:. x x:«x.�xx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... trilby NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... phase 4 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 10 0 -- 1 THRU 15 7 -- 0 RIGHT 0 1 -- 28 NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------- ------------ ---- ---' EB W. NB SR ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 -- , ■ r EN Nam m.00 WE Sa laa m WE Paae-1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (Pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = - - v LOS P M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 1 884 877 > 877 > 876 > > 995 > 959 >A RIGHT 34 1000 1000 > 1000 > 955 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 12 1000 1000 1000 988 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... trilby NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... phase 4 DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/25/91 am pm 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paoe-S 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page- 1 _____________________________________________________________________ xx.xxx»xxxxxxxxx»»-xx.x xxxxxxxxxx:xxxx:x xxxxxxxx:xxxxxxx»xx»':r xr; »:x xxxxxx.x» POTEN- ACTUAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------- RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) (pcph) c (pcph) c (Pcph) = c - v LOS AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 p M SH k SH PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .9 AREA POPULATION ...................... 80000 MINOR STREET - NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... trilby ' SE LEFT 1 953 933 933 > 989 > 832 965 >> >A NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... phase 4 1 RIGHT 23 999 999 > 999 > 976 > A MAJOR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 EB LEFT 39 1000 1000 1000 961 A TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... trilby _______________________________________________ ______________ NAME OF THE NORTH'' SOUTH STREET.... phase 4 INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION DATE AND TIME OF THE A.NALYSIS..... 9/25/91 ; am pm 95 OTHER INFORMATION.... MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EE; WB NB SB ____ ____ ---- LEFT 32 0 -- 1 THRU 3 20 -- 0 RIGHT 0 1 -- 19 NUMBER OF LANES ----------------------------------------------- EB WE. NE= S6, L ANE_. ____1__ 1 --. 1 M M M M M M M M = M M r M M M M M M 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS %Y.%t%%%%#FJC Y:Y IY'X.%t:kFF%EPEE#K##FY F.t#%F Y'#Y:%FFFFX%%Y:F: FACILITY LOCATION.... lemay ANALYST .............. mid M F ANALYSIS 91 9"2 �, 94r TI E U ,S�o DATE OF ANALYSIS..... ./27/91 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS I ------- -------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS...... PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 01 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH)-------------- ----------- 50 PEAK. HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 68 / 32 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 - PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS --------- -----------------------------------`----------- ROLLING TERRAIN - E E �T f f f LOS B R w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- A 4 3 3.2 ----- 1 ----- ----- .9 .94 B 5 3.4 3.9 1 .9 .93 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .9 .93 D 5 2.9 3.3 1 .9 .93 E 5 2.9 ..... 1 .9 .93 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 550 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 550 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --- --------- ---- A 166 .07 B 443 .19 C 917 .35 D 121 -52 E 2111, Q? LOS FOE: r--:IV�N CONDITIONS- C 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS X%X.##%FX%#.Y'Y%YYY###t##K###X###Y#YY: FACILITY LOCATION.... lemay ANALYST .............. mic095 � TIME OF ANALYSIS..... am(^ 9i 92 93 9415 1 DATE OF ANALYSIS.---- 94 /91 `� OTHER INFORMATION.... ?010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 38 / 62 LANE WIDTH(FT) ............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------ ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B Ft w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- A. 4 3 3.2 ----- 1 ----- .9S ----- .94 B 5 P'.4 3.9 1 .93 .93 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .93 .93 D 5 9-9 3-3 1 .93 .93 E 5 2.9 ;.., 1 .93 .93 C) LEVEL.OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------ INPUT VOLUME(vph): 739 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 739 SERVICE LO'S FLOW RATE V/C --- --------- A 172 .07 B 45S 19 C 844 .35 LO> FOR GIVEN COP•!D11 1ONS.: C m m m m m m N*m 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS MX X:Y.X/YY: Y:Y KYY::t XY1X%Y'X'Y XYA:Y YXM:KXXXXXXXXY Y.Y Y.XXXX x W.YYYY:KYX:A Y.Y z:K1YY. Y:.V: FACILITI' LOCATION__.. southridge greens ANALYST. ........... id TIME OF ANALYSIS..... am prti 91 92 93 94 O DATE OF ANALYSIS..... / 27/91 OTHER INFORMATION_... 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 0 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50, PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 26 / 74 LANE WIDTH (FT) ..................... 1"G USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV --- ----- --- ----- A 4 ., 3.2 ----- 1 ----- .87 ----- 1 6 5 3.4 3.9 1 .87 1 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .87 1 D 5 2.9 3.3 1 .87 1 E 5 <.9 3.3 1 .87 1 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS -------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 186 7---------------- ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 188 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C _A1700 _ ----__ _--- B 461 .19 C 849 D 1261 52 E 2231 92 LOS FOF: G I VEr• CUND I'. I Or.S j B 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS Y:XW.YX.XY:YiXXtY:AX<Y_f tXYYW.YW.Y YYYMXY XXXYtYXYXYX<MY X:YYYY W.Y F'YY KkXYYYXX FACILITY LOCATION._ southridge greens ANALYST .............. m-id TIME OF ANALYSIS..... am pm 1 92 93 94(9?1 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 9//91 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 0 j PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED MPH) ------------- - 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR........ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 59 / 41 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 j USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT-) ... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS -------------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS B R w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- A 4 ,. 3.2 ----- 1 ----- ----- .95 1 B 5 3.4 3.9 1 .95 1 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .95 1 D 5 2_S 3.'3 1 .95 1 E C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS -------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 212 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 212 SERVICE LOS FLOW R-TE V/C _A185O _ ______ --__ E' 503 .I9 C =_ ?5 _4-17 .92 LC9 FOi: GIVEN. •^_.ONDITIONS.: E. 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I 1985 RCM: UNSIGNALIZEII INTERSECTIONS. Page-1 1K'YtiYXV:t C11:XY4XYXKY Y:�.XKXKtiXXXKKKXXXXXXXXKXKKXXXXX KXXY X'K Y Y.XXX 'X XXXXKXY' IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ' -------------------------- _------------------------- _________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 I PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET --------- southridge greens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay ' NAME OF THE,ANALYST.................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/25/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ' --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SE ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 45 0 30 THRU -- 0 365 170 RIGHT -- 105 10 0 NUMBER. OF LANES --------------------------------------------- E6 W6 N6 SI ------- -------------- ---- LANES -- 1 - CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE °age-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL SLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY v LOS MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcprj) cM(ocPh) „SH(ocph) cR `SY, P _______ ________ _________ _ MINOR STREET 253. > C WB LEFT 52 346 336 > 584 336 > 410 >A RIGHT 122 855 855 > 855 > 733 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 35 689 689 689 654 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southrid9e greens bled NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/26/9i am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... M M M M M = M M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECT'ONS. F'aae-1 XY YYY.Y:Y-.X:i'XYY;'t'Y;'I.AYKY.X MY:'K>1: I:XYXY:Y<t:K<YY Y;YYYY :I: f: Y:K XXY; �Y Y. Y'. Y, );Y Y.Y tYXY.XY.K :KY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------- �----------------- I AVERAC-E RUNNIPC- SPEED, MAJOR S R ET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET --------- southridge greens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay 1 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)------ 9/26;91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am Pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH- CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WE NB S5 ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 25 0 90 THRU -- 0 325 430 RIGHT -- 60 40 0 NUMBER OF LANES Ebk____ ------- ------- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paae-3 ------------------------------------------- — ---- --------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIA_ MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (Pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH .------------------------ ------------------------ --- MINOR STREET i f WB LEFT 29 206 185 > 185 > 156 > > 415 > 317 >B RIGHT 69 360 860 > 860 > 791 > A MAJOR STREET S8 LEFT 104 698 698 698 594 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------9------------------------- ---- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... southrid e areens blvd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/26/91 ; am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... t t t 0 f N Lo 1 N N — t l� t t ' 9 oc? l� t LL C s u N to N t O� 0 t t t 9 0 r�,r-o. AM/PM Q N Figure 3 t 1991 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC m m m 1925 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS s cxY".y.xXxY3Y<Y%'xXX<FXta:r::I:Wf.XX<XtiXX Xf i::KXX a'.W Xt>.Y-X XXXXt.� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION I AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR. STREET.. 35 j Paae-1 XxX=X'KXX>XXXXr: r:*=+. PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 AREA POPULATION ...................... I 100000 f NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... p 2/3 north i NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid i DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/ddJyy)...... 9/26/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. (D pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION I MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH. CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------- EE WE NB SS ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 5 THRU -- 0 360 200 t RIGHT -- 15 5 0 f NUMBER OF LANES ----------------------------------------------- EE Wn NB SE LANES CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESER.VF RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pceh) A(ocph- ) = c - v LOS p M - SH �R SH ------- - --------------------------------------- --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 348 346 > 346 > 340 > i > 627 > 604 >A RIGHT 17 860 $60 > 860 > 843 > A MAJOR, STREET SB LEFT 6 698 698 698 692 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------- ------------------------- ---------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STP.EET...... p 2/3 north NAME OF THE NORTHJSOUTH STREET.'... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/26/91 am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1995 HCM: UNSIGNALtZEC INTERSECTIONS Paae-1 Y-YK:K.Y XK:K�Kt:<XYZYt Y.Iti Y. Y't K! 4KY T.<K<YCKYRY Y.V;Y,'[:C Y,iYZKYYYYKx'I; :K W.Y Y:K XX YY w:K ?.':Kf I IDENTIFYING INFORMATION j --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING- SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... p 2/3 north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST_ ................ mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/26/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES. --------------------------------------------------------------------- ES WB NE SF ---- --- --- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 20 THRU -- 0 325 420 RIGHT -- 15 5 0 I NUMBER OF LANES EB WIB NE. SE'. -------------- ------- LANES -- 1 _ _ I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paae-3 ------------------------ --------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL M0VEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(ocph) c (Pcph) c fpcoh) c (pcah) - = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------ ------------------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 244 239 > 239 > 234 > > 527 > 504 >A RIGHT 17 879 879 > 879 > 862 > A MAJOR STREET SS LEFT 23 731 731 731 708 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... p 2/3 north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemav DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS.._.. 9/26/91 ; am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... 0 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paae-1 zz:rzzY+.rsrr:xzzzz>vzczzzzzx.zx<szzzzzzzxzzz.z zznrzt----------zzxcx z:rxz.xz. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ! --------------------------------------------------------------------- i AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... p2/3 south NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay ' NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/26/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES. ---------------------------------------------------- ES W6' NE. SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 5 THRU -- 0 355 200 RIGHT -- 10 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WE: NE ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES -- 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE ------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) (pcph) - (pcPh) e M ------- -------- --------- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 3.51 349 RIGHT 12 863 863 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 703 703 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION Paa--3 ----------------------- SHARED RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY c (pcph) - = c - v LOS SH R SH ---------- ------------ --- > 349 > 343 > > 579 > 562 >A� > 863 > 851 > r 703 697 A NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... p2/3 south NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/26/91 am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1955 HCM: UNSICNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ♦'.KYX#:CYY.YYY##.KY'Y YYIK#YYY:Y.Y.CYXY:Y:K.XKY'l'Y'X:Y.YYYYYXX:YK#t.Y##YYXKWY:#KY.#XYY'<YY. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 ; AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... p2/3 south NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid ' DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/26/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES - ------------ ----- --------------------------------------- EE k6 NE. SE --- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 15 THRU -- 0 320 410 RIGHT -- 10 10 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------- EE W2 NB --------------------- --- LANES -- 1 _ CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ----- ----------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- .ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(ocph) c (pcPh) c (pcoh) c (pcph) c = A - - v LOS p M SH R SH ------ ---------------- ----------- --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 252 249 > 249 > 243 > > 476 > 459 >A RIGHT 12 879 679 > 879 > 868 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 731 731 731 714 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------- ---------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... P2/3 south NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/26/91 ; am� 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... 10 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS I Face-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 1 ------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOF. STREET.. 35 I' PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... p 5 north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... iemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid I DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/26/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WEST60UND: STOP SIGN Th AFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------------------------------- EE WB NB S5 LEFT -- 5 0 5 I THRU -- 0 330 185 RIGHT -- 5 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES __________________________________________ ------ WE, CIR __-Er__ ------- -_----- _-_NE__------- 1 LANES__ _ 1 2 _ 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIA1_ MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v L06, p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET WS LEFT 6 378 376 > 376 > 370 > � > 526 > 515 >A RIGHT 6 876 676 > $76 > 871 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 _ 7" 727 727 721 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... p 5 north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... iemay DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/26/91 am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 Ya Y,4Y::KtY'KY'KKY K:KY<RYY:Y.YY'.K.KYY'Y: K. Y'YY'Y"Y:t V"1"Y K.K Y(:KY Y".K KRY.}KY'X�Y: !K'Y. <Y: K.YY2tY: Y: Y: K:1"Y :I. I IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, -MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 I AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET --- a 5 north I NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/26/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am (p lr 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NE; SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT __ 5 0 THRU -- 0 225 325 RIGHT -- 5 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------- EF WE. N5 ------- ------- ------- LANES -- 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE ------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) (pcph) p M ------- -------- --------- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 254 353 RIGHT 6 933 933 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 830 830 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION Pace-5 ------------------------- SHARED RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY (pcph) c = c - v LOS SH R SH ---------- ------------ --- > 353 > 347 > B > 512 > 501 >A > 933 > 928 > A 330 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... p 5 north NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET__ iemay (((�'''-� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/26/91 ; am 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... of 824 A I 7495 HCM= UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paae-7 i CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Faoe-3 I IDENTIFYING INFORMATION POTEN- ACTUAL -------------------------------------------------- FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE -------------- RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET." 35 MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) r (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 I MINOR STREET NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... p5 south WB LEFT 6 378 376 > 376 > 310 > B > 526 > 515 >A ' NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET""..... I lemay RIGHT 6 876 876 > 876 > 871 > A NAME OF THE ANALYST""".....".""....". mid MAJOR STREET DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd,yy)"...". 9/26/91 SB LEFT 6 727 727 727 721 A TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.".""""""".""""". am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... IDENTIFY]NG ]NFOkMATION INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- — -----------------------_______________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.""... p5 south NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET""." lemay INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION . DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS."... 9/26/91 ; am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION"""" MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- E5 WB NE SE ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- ., 0 5 THRU -- 0 330 185 " RIGHT -- 5 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------- E: WS _______ _____ LANES -' i CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS f Page-1 _______ ___________ _______ ________ x `kxsssx t:KXss Y.W xW #V: Rx'.W WxXxR Y.s Y.'I:1 Y's sRsxx. W.sxW *M:CYv:ssY"Ix v M'. v:t K:1::v::YW YM: V'x ssxf IDENTIFYING INFORMATION FLOW- W- AL TTIAL ACTUAL F CMOVEMENT - -------------------------------------------------------------- RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY ' MOVEMENT v(pcch) c (ccph) c (pcph) AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. :5 ------- -p M ------ --------- PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 MINOR STREET AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 WB LEFT 6 354 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... p5 south RIGHT 6 933 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay MAJOR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid SB LEFT 6 830 DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/26/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 2010' OTHER INFORMATION.... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION SHARED CAPACITY (pcph) SH ------------ . aae 3 -------------- RESERVE CAPACITY c = c - v LOS R SH ----------- --- 353 >- 353 > 347 > B > 512 > 501 >A 933 > 933 > 928 > A 830 830 824 A INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... p5 south ---------------------------------------------- -------- NAME OF THE NORTH 'SOU TH STREET.... lemay INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/26/91 ; am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WS NE SE; ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 5 THRU -- 0 225 325 RIGHT -- 5 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------- E6 WE NE _______ _______ _______ LANE`; __ 1 i 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Rage-1 I CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE r::xx.x rxxxxixx.x rrx xx.x...w.rxxxxrx r:x xxr:r..cr.xrr.xi: 'rx tz x:w'r". 'r xxxzr:x xxrxxxxxx---------------------------------------. POTEN- ACTUAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- ' RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) P M ------- ----------------- -----— -----Paae_3 SHARED RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY c (pcph) c = c - v LOS SH R SH ---------- ------------ --- PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 6 538 535 > 535 > 529 > " NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... trilby > 799 > 759 >A' RIGHT 35 871 871 > 871 > 836 > NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... phase 4 access NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 12 971 971 971 960 A DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/26/91 i TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 2010 i OTHER INFORMATION.... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... trilby ----- ----------------------------- ---------------'------------- NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET_... phase 4 access DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/26/91 Pm 2010 INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION OTHER INFORMATION._._ MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES Eft WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 10 0 -- 5 THRU 180 170 -- 0 RIGHT 0 5 -- 30 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------- E5 WB NB ------- ------- ----- LANES , -- i I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 'X.KZY:?Xzzz KXXYXXzzzl:+:"YYY:z>.XXXYX<zXZYzi Y.1:.TZXYzz.Y.; >XXX. i.YXXZYXiYtiY:zzzXX iY, IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -- ---- -------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 , PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .95 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... trilby NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... phase 4 access NAME OF THE ANALYST ................... mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...__. 9/26/91 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.._. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------- ---------------- ----------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SE� ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT. 30 0 -- 5 THRU 250 210 -- 0 RIGHT 0 5 -- 20 i NUMBER OF LANES --EP- --w--- ---NE, -- -- LANES: CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE _3 ------------— — ----------------Pape — POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) C = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ----------- -- -------- --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT . 6 446 436 > 436 = 430 > 1 > 703 > 674 >A RIGHT 23 830 630 > 830 > 807 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 35 941 941 941 906 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------- ---- -----------------—— ---------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... trilby NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... phase 4 access DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/26/91 ; am �rt� 2010 OTHER INFORMATION.... v Table 1 1 1991 Peak Hour Operation With Existing Traffic ' Intersection AM PM Lemay/Southridge Greens Blvd. B WB LT A WB RT WBLT/RT A A A A SB LT A A 2 Table ' Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Phase 1 30 Single Family DU 300 6 17 19 11 ------Phase _2 30 Single Family DU— - 300 6 17 19 1-1— Phase 3 42 Single Family DU 420 8 23 26 16 Phase 4 36 Single Family DU 360 7 20 23 13 Phase 5 43 Townhouse DU 250 3 16 16 8 Total 1630 30 93 103 59 i 1 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS YXW.A.Y.A:tYYYY'Yrlxx ZrrYYIY.x MxrXX.Y xxxxrxrxarYi'Y'asxrasYRrr.4rxxttrxY t:l' FACILITY LOCATION.... lemay ANALYST .............. mid TIME OF ANALYSIS..... am pm 91 92 93 94 95 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 1/91 OTHER INFORMATION.... 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------------ ______ ----------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... D" PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 70 / 30 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG_ WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ----------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E - E f ~B f f LOS T R w ----- d ----- HV ----- --- ----- ----- ----- A a _ 3.2 1 .89 94 B 5 3-4 3.9 1 .89 .93 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .89 .93 D 5 2.9 3.3 1 .89 .93 E 5 2_.9 .,-. 1 .89 .93 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ----------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 670 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 670 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C --- --------- ----- A 165 .07 8 4aS 19 C 808 .35 D 1200 E _ _; 92 LOS FOR PIVEN CONDITIONS:- C 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS a:sv:sxsrrrxaxsxra"s sssa:+srsxrsrssxrxss:v.ssss s rsrssrsssss xsxsrxsxrsv. FACILITY LOCATION.... 'iemay ANALYST -------------- mid ! TIME OF ANALYSIS..... am pm 91 92 93 94 95 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... /91 OTHER INFORMATION.... 201D A) • ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _______________________________________________________. PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 2 PERCENTAGE OF RUSES ......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 43 / 57 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES ................'.... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f ! LOS T B R w d HV ----- i __- _____ _____ _____ A 4 _ 3.2 _____ 1 _____ .96 .94 B 5 3.4 3.9 1 .96 .93 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .96 .93 0 5 2.9 3.3 1 .96 .93 E 5 2.9 3.3 1 .96 .93 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ----- ------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 905 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 905 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C ---- ----------- A 177 07 j B 472 .1r' C 369 'S D ?> E '_235 .92 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS: D M M M M M M M 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS zzzzzzxzzssszszxzzzrxxxrxszszssszzsxzzxzzsxzxxszxs�zzxxxxzzzzxzx FACILITY LOCATION.... southridge Greens ANALYST .............. mid TIME OF ANALYSIS..... Pm 91 92 93 94 95 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... /91 OTHER INFORMATIGN'.... 2010 , A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _____________________________________________________________ PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS......... PERCENTAGE OF BUSES ......................... 0' PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1, DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 21 / 79 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG_ WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ' -------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN ----------------'_ E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- ----- A 4 S 3.2 1 ----- .84 ----- 1 B 5 3.4 3.9 1 .84 1 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .84 1 U 5 2.9 3.3 1 .84 1 E 5 2.9 3.3 1 .84 1 _ C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(vph): 190 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 190 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C _-_ ______ 16407_ B 445 .19 C S19 .35 D 1217 .52 _ 2154 .92 LOS. FnQ GIVEN CONDITIONS. °- 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS szsxsszs ssszssxzzzzxzsxxz szsss zs zsssz x.x.x zzzzxzszzzzxzssx xs xssxxx FACILITY LOCATION.... southridge greens ANALYST .............. mid TIME OF ANALYSIS..... am(pm 91 92 93 94 95 DATE OF ANALYSIS..... OTHER INFORMATION.... 2010 A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ________________________ __________----_________'__' PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS ........................ 0 40 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES .......................... 0 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES......... 0 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) .......................... 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN).......... 60 / 40 LANE WIDTH(FT)............................. 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT.)... 6 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES .................... 50 8) CORRECTION FACTORS -------- ---- ----------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN ------------- E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV --- ----- ----- ----- A 4 3 3.2 ----- 1 ----- .94 ----- 1 B 5 3.4 3.9 1 .94 1 C 5 3.4 3.9 1 .94 1 D 5 2.9 3.3 1 _94 1 E 5 2.9 3.3 1 .94 1 A C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME(voh): 215 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 215 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C ___ _________ ----- A 184 .07 B Soo 19 C 921 .35 D 1369 .5" c '421 .92 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS B 1