The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutK 2 INDUSTRIAL PARK LOT 1 JB EXCAVATION PDP - 51 91C - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS (3)own" STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fori Collins James Bath Date: 8/22/01 1316 S. Summitview Dr Fort Collins, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for K-2 INDUSTRIAL PARK - JB EXCAVATION, #51-91C, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Current Planning 3 Issue Contact. Steve Olt This property is presently operating as Colorado Customs RV & Marine. 4 Issue Contact: Steve Olt Len Hilderbrand of Excel Energy (Public Service) indicated that they have no concerns or comments regarding this development proposal. 5 / t: Steve Olt A copy of the comments rece uckols of the Zoning Department i tta"C this comme er. a contact Jenny, at (970)221-6760, if you have a out her 6 Issue Contact: Steve Olt Rick Lee of the Building Inspection Department stated that a copy of the various codes that the Fort Collins Building Department will enforce is attached to this comment letter. With limited information provided please be aware that the _ --Access-Aisle serving -the accessible parking space should be a smooth hard LAI surface. This may require that the new walk be increased to 60" and be I provided the whole length of the parking space per Section 502.3 of the 1998 ANSI 117.1. Please contact Rick, at (970)221-6760, if you have questions about his comments. 7 Issue Contact: Steve Olt Beth Sowder of the Streets Department indicated that they have no concerns or 4 (\�' comments regarding this development proposal. 1 of 7 g Issue Contact: Steve Olt Craig Foreman of the Parks Planning Department indicated that they have no U/Ik concerns or comments regarding this development proposal. g _J&s e-C-&ntact: Steve Olt A copy of a letter fro r meyer of the Larimer & Weld Irrigation Comoanv ' is comment letter. 10 su act: Steve Olt Copies of the Water Consery arm�r or Landscapes - COMMENT SHEET and General moved from Laurie D=Audney, the City=s Utility Ed�u atie ist, is attached to this letter. 11 Issue Contact Steve Olt Alan Rutz of the Light & Power Department offered th owing comments: a. The applicant will be required to obtain a p rom the affected ditch company to cross the Larimer & Weld Can b. The applicant will also be requir obtain easements from the Larimer & Weld Irrigation Company for ele me extension to the project site. c. Coordinate transform cation(s) and power requirements with Light & Power. d. Due to the ion of this site and the easement &permit requirements, please co ight & Power as soon as possible. P!p�ftic'ontact Alan, at 224-6153, if you have questions about these 12 Issue Contact: Steve Olt Ron Gonzales of the Poudre Fire Authority has indicated that PFA has no (p/l comments due to no new structures with this project. 13 Issue Contact. Steve Olt W. Dean Smith of the Boxelder Sanitation District indicated that they have no concerns or comments regarding this development proposal. 2 of 7 14 Issue Contact. Steve Olt Webb Jones of the East Larimer County (ELCO) Water District offered the following comments: a. ELCO currently provides water service to Lot 1, K-2 Industrial Park from a ` 2'/2" water line located in the easement shown on the Site Plan. The existing �o 2'/2" water line serving the property is not capable of supplying a fire hydrant. b. ELCO has a 6" water line in County Road 48 and a 24" water line on the north side of the Larimer & Weld Canal, approximately % mile north of the site. Please contact Webb at the water district if you have questions about these comments. 15 Issue eve Olt Doug Moore of the Natural ent indicated that they have no concerns or is development proposal. 16 Issue Contact. Steve Olt GayLene Rossiter of Transfort has indicated that they have no concerns or /Zp comments regarding this development proposal. 17 Issue Contact. Steve Olt Mark Jackson of the Transportation Planning Department offered the fog IZp comments: il ' / a. Provide bike parking near the main entrance to the bu' gs. b. Contact the Colorado Department of Trans ation (CDOT) Access Management staff to discuss access iss equirements off of the frontage road system. c. Transportation Plann' ould recommend that the applicant contact Ken Waido. of th 's Advance Planning Department•to-get-information-on--- the I-2 orridor Subarea Plan and how or if it might affect this property contact Mark, at 416-2029, if you have questions about these comments. Engineering 22 Issue Contact. Susan Joy Is the TIS memo acceptable to Eric Bracke? If so, need documentation. 001 3of7 23 Issue Contact: Susan Joy(?) Complete and submit the Checklist in Appendix E-4. 25 Issue Contact. Susan Joy g�fk72 Cover Sheet: Add preamble title of "Utility Plans for...." 26 Issue Contact: Susan Joy On Cover Sheet: Add the legal description below the project name. 27 Issue Contact. Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Minimum size for the Vicinity Map is 10" x 10" and to a scale of 1 "=1000-1500'. Zoom in on the project- seethe current LCUASS, chapter 3. 29 Issue Contact. Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Update the current date (month and year) under the legal description. 30 Issue Contact: Susan Joy 11 Cover Sheet: Update the General Construction Notes, see attached. 31 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Provide 2 Project bench marks referencing the city's datum.- this information will be placed inside the General Construction Notes where asked for. 32 Issue Contact. Susan Joy 8%7; Cover Sheet: Reference the updated or current soils investigation, report. / 33 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Need the following statement annotated on the Cover Sheet: "I r hereby affirm..." . 34 Issue Contact. Susan Joy Cover Sheet: Provide the names, addresses, phone numbers for the Developer(s)/or - &-Owners(s). - _- 35 Issue Contact: Susan Joy �113 Cover Sheet: Provide an area of 4"x6" on each sheet for the Local Entity to place a stamp of approval. 36 Issue Contact: Susan Joy a�� Cover Sheet: Add the Indemnification Statement "These plans have been �j reviewed...". See Appendix E-4. 37 Grading Sheet: Add a Signature Block. 4 of 7 Issue Contact: Susan Joy 38 Issue Contact. Susan Joy 8�v) Grading Sheet: Note #5 on the Plat prohibits more than one access point to Lot 1. However, Gloria Hice-Adler with MOT (970-350-2148) does not feel it necessary to close the access point at this time. She stated that CDOT will re-evaluate the access and frontage improvements at such time the area develops in the future. 39 Issue Contact. Susan Joy $�(� Grading Sheet: Incomplete finish grade elevations shown. Please provide for streets, lot corners, and FF/Top of Foundation of buildings. 40 Issue Contact. Susan Joy Grading Sheet: Add the statement: "The top of foundation elevations shown...". See the Checklist in Appendix E-4. 41 Issue Contact. Susan Joy 8�1� Grading Sheet: Show temporary and long term erosion control devices and label. Where is the silt fencing going? 42 Issue Contact: Susan Joy 8 �� Add "Print Date" -all sheets. 43 Issue Contact: Susan Joy 8�7 Fill in "done by" information in all title blocks, all sheets. 44 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Provide all existing and proposed ROW, property lines and easements with dimensions. Label on all sheets. 46 Issue Contact: Susan Joy t/1 The frontage road Right -Of -Way lines are not clear. Is the one shown actually the centerline? If not, where is the centerline located? 47 Issue Contact: Susan Joy 8 f I:p; Are there any easements on the west and south edge of the property? If not, will need to dedicate additional ROW for future improvements: — 48 Issue Contact: Susan Joy OV2 The 30' public access right-of-way shown is actually road right-of-way. This road must be brought up to current standards or money can be escrowed for future construction. This can be addressed in the Development Agreement. 49 Issue Contact: Susan Joy $fc-J Redesign the parking lot to meet current LCUASS. Parking lot setbacks are based on ADT's of the Traffic Impact Study. OR build it as shown agreeing to redesign and reconstruct the parking lot at your expense and according to current standards at such time the road on the south side of the lot is brought up to code. If you choose this option, we would need a Development Agreement stating the above conditions. 5 of 7 n 51 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Add Detail Sheet and show current LCUASS details (Cross -pans, access ramps, 6 curb and gutter, & sidewalks, etc). 52 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Dimension all sidewalks and reference appropriate detail. 53 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Show existing driveway locations of neighboring properties, labeled & / dimensioned. 54 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Show existing features adjacent to this development in a ghosted or alternate line weight for a minimum of 150' beyond the project limits. 55 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Show general location of signs. 56 Issue Contact: Susan Joy All manhole locations, valves, curb stops, meter pits, etc, need to be dimensioned from the centerline of the roadway. 57 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Or� Size and label all manholes. 60 Issue Contact: Susan Joy Landscape Plan: Please show all existing and proposed ROW, property lines �Jt and easements with dimensions. Light & Power 59 Issue Contact: Alan Rutz Applicant is not planning any change to existing load at this time. No comment unless applicant is adding or changing existing electric load. Natural Resources 62 Issue Contact: Doug Moore Show buffer around offsite windbreak- • If the offsite windbreak is shown on plans the 25' buffer that is required by the Land Use Code needs to be shown as well. Police 2 Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Plans do not indicate lighting. Some type of down lighting desirable for north ll� and south entrances. Security lighting for area between buildings. t 6of7 61 Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Lack of lighting and type of landscaping between office and garage will increase potential security problems Stormwater Utility 20 Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Erosion control Comments: 1. There is silt fencing mentioned in the report but not shown on the plans. 2. Please provide erosion control efficiency calculations as well as escrow calcs. 21 Issue Contact. Basil Harridan Floodplain Comments: Please address whether the building improvements will exceed 50% of the value of the current building. If they do, then the Substantial Improvement policy would be applicable. The building would then need to be floodproofed. Please confirm in the report that no additional fill will be placed in the floodplain. As previously requested please provide the Ayres report documenting the "no rise" condition with the next submittal. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Yours Truly, STEVE OLT City Planner 7 of 7 el*