The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutKINGSTON WOODS PUD SECOND FILING PRELIMINARY - 58 91B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY00 0 0 O 0 O J O v 0 z g w O J LL, D z w a z r z a m _MM M W of =1 cJ J W O W x H F- Q M MEMORANDUM c To: Leo Schuster, Progressive Living Structures N Don Frederick, Frederick Land Surveying 10 Fort Collins Transportation Division M Fort Collins Planning Department M From: Matt Delich �� Date: July 6, 1992 Subject: Kingston Woods, 2nd Filing traffic study (File: 9245MEM1) Kingston Woods, 2nd Filing is a single family residential development consisting of 22 single family dwelling unit lots. It is located near the Shields/Horsetooth intersection as shown in Figure 1. Specifically, it is located west of Richmond Drive and east of/adjacent to Kingston Woods PUD. This parcel was part of the Williamsburg PUD, which was proposed for development in 1986. A traffic study ("Williamsburg PUD Site Access Study," September 1986) was prepared for that submittal. In that traffic study, 102 multi -family dwelling units were assumed on the same parcels. This memorandum acts as an update to that traffic study. Peak hour traffic counts were obtained at the Horsetooth/ Richmond intersection in 1991 and at the Horsetooth/Shields intersection in 1992 for other traffic studies in this area. These are shown in Figure 2. These intersections operate as indicated in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in z Appendix A. This operation is acceptable. Acceptable w operation is defined as level of service D or better. zKingston Woods, 2nd Filing is proposed to have a total W of 22 dwelling units. The site plan is shown in Figure 3. Also shown in Figure 3 are the general limits of Horsetooth Commons, which is the later name of the Williamsburg PUD. Z Thirteen dwelling units are proposed on the "L" shaped cul- g de -sac to the north and 9 dwelling units are proposed on the acul-de-sac to the south. Trip generation for Kingston Woods, g 2nd Filing is shown in Table 2. The generated trips were N distributed as shown in Figure 4. z a °-` Figure 5 shows the short range (1995) peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Background traffic was increased to reflect an increase of 3 percent per year, and included the recently proposed developments of Kingston Woods PUD to the ~ west and Mountainridge Farm to the south. Peak hour operation is shown in Table 3. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. Operation at the key intersections will be acceptable. 0 Lo '- Ln 00 00 �0� v rn v \ — 70/90 ,f + -W-10/15 ,r' 20/30 45/75 — 10/10 am I 30/70 to 00 co co N N 0 LO SITE N 4 W N _ to to U) In . to N N co co Lo to � `� to 0 00 (O 70/110 M N — 170/400 �— 390/990 270/790 1 /r- 5/ 15 HORSETOOTH140/ ) jt�co• 175 20/30 f 170/95_ 100;/630 I 760/460 5/5� u��n0 0U)0� 160/180o 00 N AM / PM LONG RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 Table 4 Long Range Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Shields/Horsetooth (signal) C C Horsetooth/Richmond (stop sign) NB LT/T E (C/D) E (C/D) NB RT A A SB LT/T E (D) F (D/E) SB RT A A EB LT A C WB LT B A Shields/Richmond (stop sign) EB LT/T F (D) F (E) EB RT A A WB LT/T E (D) F (D/E) WB RT A A SB LT C D NB LT B D ( ) Level of service based upon recent delay research - Peak hour operation at key intersections is currently acceptable. - In the short range future, the peak hour operation will be acceptable with the Kingston Woods, 2nd Filing and other assumed developments in the area. - In the long range future, the Horsetooth/Shields signalized intersection will operate acceptably with improved geometry, generally in conformance with standard arterial street cross sections in the City of Fort Collins. New signals will not be warranted at the Horsetooth/Richmond or Shields/Richmond intersections. At these intersections, there will be some delays to left -turn exits from Richmond Drive. This is generally accepted at arterial/local intersections. - The design speed on the 901 curve on the north cul-de-sac is 14 mph. Variance of the design speed should be granted. This curve can be signed for a 10 mph advisory speed. APPENDIX A 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ' KXXXXX%XXX%%%XX%%%XXXXXX%XXXX%XXXXXXXX%XX%X%%%XXX%X%XX%%%XXXXXXXXXXXXXX%X% INTERSECTION..horsetooth/shields AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... mjd OATE..........4 5/92 TIME......... am pm 1992 1995 COMMENT....... VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB W8 NB 58 LT 117 111 59 220 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 492 154 599 474 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 17 173 128 29 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ---------------------------- --------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARP.. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 Y 28.8 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 Y 28.8 3 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 Y 25.8 3 S8 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 Y 25.8 3 ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PD X WB LT X SB LT X X X TH X TH X X RT X RT X X PO X PD X- X GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 4.0 44.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 5.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.403 0.320 20.6 C 21.3 C TR 0.522 0.320 21.5 C W6 L 0.531 0.320 23.0 C 20.7 C TR 0.363 0.320 20.0 C " N8 L 0.098 0.520 9.2 B 13.3 8 T 0.424 0.460 13.9 8 R 0.204 0.460 12.3 6 SB L 0.037 0.620 5.6 8 10.2 8 T 0.555 0.530 12.4 8 R 0.040 0.530 8.6 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 15.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.516 LOS = C 1985 HCM:. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX INTERSECTION..horseto_oth/shields AREA TYPE. ....OTHER - ANALYST ....... mjd _ DATE....:..... 4/5/92 TIME.......... am m 1992 1995 COMMENT....... VOLUMES GEOMETRY . EB W8 N6 SB EB WB NB SB LT 35 121 117 290 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12 ' TH 288 544 580 569 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12 RT 25 361 71 99 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 R 12- RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 Y 28.8 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 Y 28.8 3 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 Y 25.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 Y 25.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PO X WB LT X - SB LT K X X TH X TH X K RT X RT X X PO X PO X X GREEN 42.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 4.0 4.0" 44.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 5.0 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.297 0.400 17.5 C 16.9 C TR 0.259 0.400 15.8 C W6 L 0.323 0.400 17.4 C 23.4 C TR 0.786 0.400 24.2 C NB L 0.162 0.455 13.5 8 16.8 C .T 0.452 0.418 17.6 C R 0.125 0.418 14.9 8 SB L 0.046 0.545 8.9 B 15.6 C T 0.733 0.482 19.6 C R 0.151 0.482 12.1 8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay - 18.7 (sec/veh) V C = 0.733 LOS = C I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 Z ZZZ#####Z#######Z###Z#ZZ#########Z#YZZZZZZZ##ZZ##Z############### IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... richmond NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 7/4/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ e pm 1991 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTH80UND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------ EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 2 1 2 1 THRU 631 218 1 1 RIGHT 1 1 10 2 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 2 2 . LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (Pcph) c= c v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------ ------------------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT - 2 261 259 > 260 259 > 257 257 >C C THROUGH 1 262 262 > 262 > 261 > C RIGHT 11 744 744 744 733 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 1 258 255 > 258 255 > 256 253 >C C THROUGH 1 262 262 > 262 > 261 > C RIGHT 2 945 945 .945 943 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 2 853 853 853 850 A WB LEFT 1 520 520 520 519 A IPI:(.1a1i7Ilq♦IzIi011 ato] z NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... richmond� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/4/92 am m 1991 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION - 1 AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... richmond NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 7/4/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1991 OTHER INFORMATION..._ INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 1 14 2 2 THRU 419 630 1 1 RIGHT 1 2 8 4 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------- EB LANES 2 LANE USAGE WB NB SB ` -2-- ------- ------ LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 2 187 183 > 183 183 > 180 180 >D 0 THROUGH 1 188 185 > 185 > 184 > D RIGHT 9 843 843 843 834 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 2 186 181 > 183 181 > 179 179 >D D THROUGH 1 188 185 > 185 > 184 > D RIGHT 4 744 744 744 739 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 1 520 520 '520 519 A WB LEFT 15 670 670 670 654 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... richmond DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/4/92 ; am pm 991 OTHER INFORMATION.... APPENDIX B i h { -rM. iGN.aLiZEO iNiE.-._EITi^N5 .IJMMAFY R�h'ORT � . CYYY i.I IY tYXY.tYY:k.YYXT Y,[YYYYY.tI.fYfYY:YYY e.YYtYYY.Y:K:tt[lItYYY:f'.YY YCYYYY YYYY':t V:Y'!YY INTERSECTION-.horseto-athi_hields " AREA TYPE.... .OTHER . ANALYST. ....rn Jd DATE . 1 ME ciP m _On.r.1CNT ----------- I----------------- - - -- --------- W6 -36 __ =_ tdn NB 4E TH 547 173 '-- - 0 T _.0 T - I2.0 . Z'_ 18^- 147 Tom. 0 TS 12-0 .0 t'-0 RP 0 0 0 G /.0 '.0 1".0 12.0 Y"-e t7.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE Hv AOJ PKG 6USE= PHF %ED=. Pam'- BUT. ARR. TYPE !%) (%) YIN Nm Nb Y,'N min T - E= 0.00 i.00 N i 0-90 _ y :S 8 3 WB 0.00. 1.00 N 0 - 1 0.90 5 Y 23.8 3 NB 0.00 1-00 N 0 1 0.9D 5 Y 25.3 3 36 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 25.3 .3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNALL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH =. 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH- PH-- PH-4 E6 LT X NB LT X Y TH X - TH X " RT X RT X PO X PD - X W8 LT X 58 Li _ X X X . TH X TH - X X RT X - RT" X X PD - X.. PD - X b" - GREEN 33.0 0-13 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6 . 1) a . 0 44.0 13 0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 9.0 5..0 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVF! OF EERVICE LANE GRP. VIC G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS i 0.464 0-350 le-G C -20.1 C . TR 0.535 0.35G 20.1 C wB e_53 0:35r, r i9.0 TR 0.367 SO 75. C - G.,171 0.4G0 P. 0. 22S 0.46G It-4 ___._______________________________________________________________________ 7'N TERSE!' T..'(J: Lead: _ + - r._�r /•:ei'.j V/;. { . 193`_ ":CM: SIGNALIZE�INT-RSE IONS . SUMMa Y REPORT - %XY:C KY t:KX.%X:KXY.'kXYXY.TXK:XR.KYY:TYX:tY YYYYY YYY tY:YYYXY:KYY'YXYY kXYYYYXX:kXYtYYYYXY.T:% INTERSECTION .horse tooth/shields .. -a TYPE..... G THE`^: r. nIALYST ... _--.mJd F 7; `` Shero i t .` - - - - - .dm !•�- `n4 �..,_ raMEN T ....... ----- --- - ----------- ---------------------------------------------- VOLUME9 GEOMETRY `E8 WB r'�8 =- E3 W6 N6 56 LT 47 136 133 i} L 12. 1--0 12-0 L 12 TN 322 606 ado 72.IJ - 7 12.0 'T 1.2.0 T 12 RT 31 393 - L ' TK 12.0 12.0 1 12-0 R 12._ RR 0 0 9 1i 0 R 12-0 12.0 O 12.0 12.0 !^.r, 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- . ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG RUSE= PHP PECS PED. BUT. ARP. TYPE ( % ) M YIN ,Nm. Nb YIN min T E8 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 Y 23_8 3 W6 O.GO 1.00 N- 0 1 0.90 - 5 "Y 28.5s H6 0.00 1-00 N 0 1 0.90 - Y 75.8 3 56 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 5 Y 25.8 3 -------------------------------------- ---------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGiH = 110.0- PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X - 'NB LT - X X TH X TH - X RT X - RT X PD X PD X . WB LT X' S6 LT _ . X X" X TH X _ - TH - "X X RT X =T X X PO X' - PD X X -GREEN 44.0 03.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN- 4-0 4.0 45.0 0.1 Y;=LLOW 5.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 "YELLOW 3.0 0.0 5.0 0 ---------- -- - -- ----- - LEVEL Or"SERVICE LANE GRP- v/C G/C DELAY U)S. APP. DELAY 'APP. LOS E6 L 0.471 j.416 19-9 r 16.5 C TR 0.274 .413 - 15.0 C 1t�23...3 C .0.329 0.41.; C r B L� 0. i62 ^-464 I- O. 454 __________________________________________________________________ ..1i� L'._ 'IN. .clay • 1 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALiZEO INTERSECTIONS Pa9�-1 S.Ck.(CYS K212(KSSSSYt!CYYYi 4.F VtCV.4 Rt F.F:(F.4.F.t..cFI,.FIc!; I.c!:F 4. C:4. t.Y ct!tt.Fl 1. !.!t iDENTiFYiNG INFORMATION ' --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET." _5 PEAK HOUR FACTOR........"". .."."". I 4REA POPULATION"..""..........".."..." 10000G T NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET:...."".. H 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET":".... ri�hfnonc NAME OF THE A.NALYST...........""".... mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..."." 7/2/92 TIME PERI00 ANALYZED................. a'.n Pm short lcng OTHER INFORMATION.."" INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG - MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN. TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB' - ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 3 1 , 5 THRU 6116 272 1 FIGHT 1 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND I -ANC USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- wc� niR SB ------- -------------- ------� CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE --------------------------------------------------------------------- - - Pace-3 ='1)T Ent- A(, IUAL FLr!+1- 71-L MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE ?ATE CAPACi 7y "Ap.%C I T7 CAPACITY CAPACITY M MOVEFNT v(p"- U - Ili _pill c.(,PCPh) _. (PcPh) C = C - . JO_ M SH P. SH MINOR STREE- NB LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MINOR STREET SB LEFT THROUGH RIGHT MAJOR STREET EB LEFT WB LEFT :14 - 212 >. 213 212 2.10 210 - 1 215 2i5 215> :14 " li 714 714714 703 - 21:_ 208 > 209 208 - 203 703 >C C. 1 .215 215 > 215 > 214 > C 3 916 916 916 913 A _ 798 798 798 195 A 476 478 478 47' .. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- - NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET" K T - NAME OF THE NORTH/:OU.TH STREET.... richmond - DATE .AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS-.- 7/2/92 am Pm shcr long OTHERINFORMATION.... - ` 0 In I V;01 P t [anDam nll Kingston Woods PUD 2nd — ravI P D M r its 5062 t 785 G 1549 Dt . Lak, 33V1 35 i - �ave�1l '' Spring CanyonCanyon.� - I -.1ri .... - 1 34 1. Gr Dam Pit r 1 Me cle AT 0 15)0 4954 111- 1 tuj- 7, IS V, I 1z r 3 Ian( OVE6V Cem ,0 cc '3 V SITE LOCATION Figure 1 1935 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-! iDENTiFYINO INFORMATION - --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING' SPEED, MAJi)R STREET.. 35 - ?FAK HOUR FACTOR .................:... 1 AREA POPULATION----------------------- l0orc0 . NAME OF THE EAST /WEST S T REET ......... r-r—.1-' :f T NAME OF THE NORTH/SOLITH STREET......- richmond NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yY)...... 7/2/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm short long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUNO: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------- EB WB "NR SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 2 la _ 6 THRU 326 340 i I ;c OH i 3 5 5 ,IUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------- -- --- --- - --- -- - -- - - --- - - - - - - CAPACITY AND LEVEL -CIF -SERVICE Paga-3, -------------------------------------------------------------------- I . OTE;N- -c T;jl! l AL MOVEMENT SH{RED RESERVE RATE ';APAC i TY CAPACiTT ...r=.0 iTY CAPACITY MOVEMENT vkrF ph) c (pcch) (e cc h} _ (- v LOS ! p M 3H R �SH .------------------------ --- —------------------- --- i ! MIF,OR STREET NB !-EFT. _ i4l- I37 13a i37 135 13 THROUGH 1 147 14T! 14U 139 CI RIGHT .l 59 .59 359 B6C A MINOR STREET 38 LEFT 7 let 137 > 133 137 > 130 131 >0 0 THROUGH 1 143 140 > 14, > 139 > D R ICHT 6 551 65: - 651 645 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 2 390 390 390 382 6 WB LEFT 15 696 696 - 696 680 A ! -IDENTIFYING INFORMATION . ----------------------------------- ----- NAME OF OF THE EAST/WEST STREE....... . Ef'� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... richmond DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS:.... 7/2/92 ; am p� hor; long _ OTHER INFORMATION.... i 1985 HCM: UNSIGNAL[ZED INTERSH;T10NS Page-1 Y:Y AYVX K:KI:Y KYY.w:'cxYIKIY v:Y!!.Y♦Y..w.Kl wKtY t..Y.Y1,1.'Yl�YY'K.YY1',Y �'. y'YYl1YlI1. 1'I I. V.w Y 1, I'.t IDENTiFYiNG INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. - t>EAK H011R FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ....................... :00000 I NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET -------- :chmc rni NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET----- . shields NAME OF THE ANALYST ........:......... mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS !mm/ddi )'•.')------ 7/2/s2 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ DPI` shor lcng OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB N8 SB ---- ---- --- LEFT 10 2 0 THRU 1) -- 994 795 RIGHT 4 -- n " NUMBER OF LANES ----------------------------------------- ____________________________ E5 WER N. 5 _______ _______ _______ _______ _,NE I CAPACITY AND --------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL -OF -SERVICE - Page-3 PO TEN- .ACTUAL - .FLOW- TIA.L MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE ::ATE OPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMEpIT _ v.I gcphi r 1per+hi c rp�ph: -(pcPh) - _Q v LOS O M _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ I�0 �'� ___ /Y I D MINOR STREET EB LEFT II 2" .._ 3 72 = RIGHT .. 66n 663 668 664 -. MAJOR STREET - NB LEFT 2 414 414 - 414 411 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET....., richmond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..._. 7/2/91 am F short long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pag=-I K KY t:f.KYYKt.v'AK:"Y,. K'.I KYYV.'Y♦KKYYI".a eY Y.K K1 �: l.YVIYY�fR♦I..�'Yf. 1'K.YYf of Kr Yrf f,�:. 1'. "f 1. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION - --------------------_---_--__---------------------------__----------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MA JOk STREET.. i5 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.... . AREA POPULATION "IOOG00 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... richmnnd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/y,)------ 7/2/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. an ce long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND,: STOP SIGN - TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------ ------ ----------- --------------- — EB WB NB SE - - ---- ---- --- LEFT 6 4 0 THRU 0 -- 1076 1072 RIGHT 2 -- 0 12 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- E,, WB Nn S;, I . ------- ------- ------- ------- I_Arf— CAPACITY AND �-EVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-= FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SH: RE, RESERVE RATE C. FACITY CAP -.CITY CAP ACiTY. CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcPh). Y (pcPh) f (prph) C= c --I LOS. F M SH R ,H MINOR STREET EE• LEFT 6:? 32 32 76 RIGHT 566 566 565 564 A MAJOR STREET . NB LEFT 4 287 237 237 283 C IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... richmond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET..... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/2/92 ; am pm shor long. OTHER INFORMATION.... - APPENDIX C 3!CM L.2ED rN f' ON I In•r:.:Ry aFf n'.T ..,.......r..rt.rar.r.Rra... ...: au.r.... ..r n... r:.r.rrxax. ..a r..r.a..R ter. r......a NTER'3ECT1ON.-hors&c-3ccH/sHi&lcs AREA TYGF_..... OTHER _NAI -3T....... mJd �1M�. ......ohm sn.lr_O - .ENT. ..... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- V:), Lb1E_. - G-Etirll_1-1, -_ WB NE. 3S �T ''6J170 1?' 90 T t% r. 7 - 1z.0 T 12.0 i'^: 12.0 tC.'7 't.0 __________________________________________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV A0.1 PKG RUSE° PHI PEUS ^ED. BUT. APR. TYPE '(/N Nm Nb y'N min T E6 0-00 1.00 N 0 1 0.90 _ Y 23.3 146 0.00 1.00 N 0 1 0-90 - Y 23.8 3 N6 0.00 1.00 iJ p 1 0-9f. 5 25.5 >° 0.00 1.00 N 'i 1 0.90 5 Y 25.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGN.AL SETT7Nr, rYCLE LENGTH = 100-0 PH-1 PH-2 P'H-i PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x x - NS LT x x TH x TH x RT x RT X - PD ._ x RD - x W6 - LT x X SB LT X x x ' TH - x TH x x - RT x RT x X PO x PD x x- - rrEEN 7.0. 30.0 0.0 0.0' GREEN 7.0 1.0 '33-0 0.0 YEI-,.-OW 3.0 �5.0 0.0 .0.0 YELLOW 3-0 .0-0 -5-0 .0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL 0. SERVICE ' LANE GRP- VIC G/C DELAY LOS APP- DELAY APP. LOS �. L 0.039 O.d20 13-1 E. _3-0 C . T 0.774 1) 20 25.7 .0 R 0.367 0-�20 20-1 13.1 T 0-275 0.320 19.= 11_ J. 2:--7 0 -1 -11 J 14 j r• L O.a71 0.520 •;dJMrA Y 'r.,vvt4<Kr.v v taft'I:e:Liaa R.X �.R r:v_ rr[vervrtltfr.taatryv/:41,RYt rAk.r Y.tt:a'.tt I.YVY:I.rt.tr INTERSECTION. .hor,&tooth/shi-7» AREA TYPE ..... OTHER . ,1110. YSI , nJ OA T7 TOME ... 0 �Rno�tCD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUME- GE OME I.+'Y E6 '.a6 N6 l r_r_ 550 - 12.0 _ 1%.n L 1<<.0 L -G TH 6�i 790 330 750 712._ 'i i2. I_.0 T I?.0 6r't ^0 400 lay 1'5 T1= D T 12.0 T 0 TR 1-1 ------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRAD'_ HV -'Di PKG BUSES - PH= PEDS PE _ BUT APR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb YIN min' T - EB 0-00 1-00 7d 0 1 0-90 5 Y 28.3 .WB 'J.00 1-00 N 0 1 0 - 5 Y 29.8 - 3 NB 0-0 0 1.00 N 0 / 0-90 - '(25.3 S6 0-00 i.00 N 0 t 0.'?0 5 Y 25.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------- -------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 110-0 PH-1 PH-2 PH PH-4 PH-i PH-2 PH_' PH-4 EB LT x x N6 LT x x TH x TH X RT x -RT _ x - PD x PD x WB LT x x 36 LT x - x X TH x - TH x x RT. x RT x x PD x Pn X. .. x GREEN 7.0 37-0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 7.0 -7.9 36-0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 5-0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3-0 0.0 5.0 0.0 LEVEL OF S=RVICE . LANE GRP- VIC - G/C DELAY LOS APP--DELAY APP- LOt�. E6 L 0.065 0-4d5 13.2 - 6 1S-6 C O.a2_ 0.255 -0.6 C. n-37� 0 :n.„ r W6 L 0-065 T 0.716 0._55 2,4 C - 0-325 O.i55 32.0 .i N'6 0-a5d 0. 40^ 20..3 --.? C 'T 0 0.'.d= T. ..-760 0.=0P _____-____________________________________________________________ '- 1-Fi_,1 - �i_1.:. _ -4 r_'_: .rah; V;r, _ --74 _ LJ= - 1935 HCM: UNSIG'NALIZED INTERSECTION': vYKK KRY KkCYKt".t:c Y4RKY.Kri(av,Yt"�Kvv 1'vfiK♦K.Yv fv tit PAS=-i v:• CKft!vv:f KYKv.: t,f vaY l:Y IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR S._BEET.- 3` PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... AREA. POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EASTJWEST ---_ `_flirt;.-- ..- ... _- - �.�. NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... richmond NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)-... _ :/2/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm shorCi,,ng OTHER INFORMATION.. -- INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------- -------------- — --------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST " CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN _ CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------- ------------- EB WB N?. SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 20 5 = >> THRU 1000 390 5 `. 1:I6HT - 70 10 15 ' NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE US -iPE --------------------------------------------------------------------- I CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- I'O TEN- AC T _I AL 'LOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SH AR ED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CA.PA.CiTY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(poph) c (pcpn) = (pOGhl = (Pcph) _ _ _ - v LOS n M S.H SH -------------- --------- ------------ --------- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 4 '37 Q0 .,> ^-0 > g2 84 >c THROUGH 6 100 91 S7 > 91 E RIGHT 11 595 595 395 564 A MINOR STREET 22.3Z CQ) 58 LEFT 61 102 95 - 96 95 > 30 34 >E E THROUGH 6 105 102 > 102 > 96 > E RIGHT 17 824 824 824 807 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 22 641 641 641 619 A W8 LEFT 6 316 316 316 311 8 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.....- N' 7— NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET..-_ richmond DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS_ --- 7/"[;92 am pm shor long OTHER INFORMATION.... f I I i 1985 HCM: UNSiGNALrZED INTFRSECTIONS. "•ea a-i R IY'Y V. 1 KKKI. K'. RK:KY 1 VI YRI f,v ♦r l.I VIKI . ♦I.. Y"If ViYYttIKA.V1 ID=NTI�YLNG iNF)RMATI?N —. -- ------------ - — --------- ------------- --------- --- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STR_ R EA.K HOUR FACTOR ..................... i AREA POPULAT!ON...................... 100000 NAME_ OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... richmond NAME OF THE ANALYST. ................. mjd - DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...._. 7/21/92 TILME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm hort Tong OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL .. ----- -------------------- - - - ------------- ------------ - --- ------ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN " TRAFFIC VOLUMES E_ WS N5 SS ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 30 1S 75 THRU 610 990 5 . RIGHT `. 110 1�J 11UMBER OF LANES A.Nn I -,',NE USAGE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- P. ------- - '. 4;.10 LEVEL-—=.<vi:.= --------------------------------------------------------------------- AC T'JAI_ FLOW- iI MOVEMENT SHARED RESE:VF RATE G,%WACITY CAPACITY. CAP AC I7Y CAPACITY. MOVEMENT. v(prph) _ (pcp•`•) (^'=ph) c (;ci ph) C= C - v LOS ------ ' ------ ----- - --------- ---------- Lc - � r•1 r �. cr. r„F _T � _21 EFT .i di o9 i 7') 7 nUGH 6 "` 75 70 E R tgl1T it �4,- 742 7ao I 7 A MINOR STREET - Z�'3g 16) 56 LEFT u_. 83 '- 7% -i6 -11 ;F F . THROUGH 5 e- 75> 75 70 . _ RrGHT =9 561 561 561 522 A MAJOR STREET Ec LEFT 232 282 28? 749 W6 LEFT 17 518 518 51S 501 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------- ----- -------------- ----------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... - !t T NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... ri,.hmond DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/2/92 am short Tuna OTHER "INFORMATION.... 1965 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paae-1. CiCCYYt";YYYYY.YtY:YlYKCC[v'v.YYKYvtl t..v..l.v v.[tY!♦ v ♦YY!! KeY,![.. [I. v. �. v,l [.Y Y,I 'OENTIFYING iNFORMATII;N --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. PEAS HOUR FACTOR.... AREA. POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... r.cmm�nd NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. . DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 7/2/92 am pm short 01,1_9 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE "NO CONTROL -------------------------------------- ------- ------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG - - MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH . CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND- STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES E8 WS NB SE'. ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 45 20 45 THRU IU 10 1100 920 RICH- 30 70 15 45 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _______--_ __________'-_ ____`I ____________ i ANE iiSA@- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERV ICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FL I W- TI:J_ MOVEMENT CH "RED - RESERVE RATE CAolciTY C^.PACITY CAPACi TY CAP A.CI TY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (Pepn) c (pcph) c 'Peen) _ = - •� LOS M SH �R SH ------ ------ ------------------ ----------- --- MINOR STREET ZED' /O c J EB LEFT 50 33 57 > 59 57 > -1 3 >Y THROUGH 11 33 59 > 69 > =5 > E P. IGHi 33 609 609 609 576 MINOR STREET 2k'b\ ID W8 LEFT 22 83 - 61 > 64 61 > 31 39 >E E THROUGH 11 83 69 > 69 > 58 > E RIGHT 77 555 555 555 478 A. MAJOR STREET $B LEFT 50 275 216 276 227 C N8 LEFT 2a 335 335 335 307 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------- --------------------------- ------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.:.... richmond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE .ANALYSIS..... 7/2/92 ; am pm short gong OTHER INFORMATION.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1985 HCM. UNSIGNALIZED iNTFRSECTIONS ra,e-I POTEN tTUAL c.:.v. a.. R...r..rr ,v.,r,.v ..:.. r. ..<.r.. ._v,.., .-... >.....,. ., ... .. . .. .,_.. .. ,:, °!OW- Ti;a_ MOVFMENT SHA = RESEP VE R.-.'E CAr.:.0 I TY' CAPAC I TY 1: -1 1 TY C4 AC I TY IC•ENTIFYLNG INFORM,%TION MOVEMENT vfpcph) c (PCPh) _ (pcph) r _ (pc'ph) - _ - v LOS .SH ----------------------------------------------------- — ------- SH R ------------- --------- ----------- ---------' AVERAGE RUNNING 3PEEiJ MAJOR S _.EET_. MINi,R <TREET : EAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 '=8 LEFT >F F AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 THROUGH '1 42 > 31 I RIGHT .7, 51r, 516 515 439 NAME OF THE E"-T/WE=1 STREET......... richmund MINOR STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields WB"LEFT 33 93 is > 36 34 > -13 1 >F E NAME OF THE ANALY=:T.................. THROUGH 42 > 25 > E RIGHT 9a 5 0 S 503 503 404 A DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/ddi YY)...... 72 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am Pm shor' iong- MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 116 223 223 223 109 0 OTHER INFORMATION_... NB LEFT 39 236 236 236 197 D " INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------------- — INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG IDENTIFYING INFORMATION MA.JOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH ----------- NAME OF THE ----------------------------------------------------- EAST/WEST STREET...... richmond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN - DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/2/92 am pm -hort lung ! OTHER INFORMATION.... CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN i TRAFFIC VOLUMES --- -- - --- ----- ----- - — - -- ---- ------- ----- ----------- - ---- ----- / " E5 WB NB SB - ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 75 30 35 105 THRU iD 15 1230 1150 RIGHT 70 90 40 80 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------s_______-__--_----__- 'A Nr, L:1N -------------- "----------- E•j-� 0 Z O 1991 V It O N N O 0 5499 (1991) mo (00) W 0 N 0 � ,q O 1/2 NVN 218/630 1/14 HORSETOOTH Q N r r v 0 rn '`-173/361 -154/544 /-111/121 8723 (1991) so 5732/(1991) 2/1 � f 17/35 852-8 (199 t _! 631/419 I I I 49 1/1 -� N o w 17/25 -� o r 0N NOO *-U)00 r � � 0 O O N 0 r In 0 O _ .. .. O 0 r r W O 0 t0 N f� 0 AM / PM Deily (Yet) RECENT DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 Table 1 r Current Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Shields/Horsetooth (signal) C C Horsetooth/Richmond (stop sign) NB LT/T C D NB RT A A SB LT/T C D SB RT A A EB LT A A WB LT A A Table 2 Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips --- in out in out North — 13 D.U. 130 3 7 8 5 South — 9 D.U. 90 2 5 6 3 Total 220 5 12 14 8 Kingston Woods P.U.D. 2nd Filing �Y. .. • • Horsetooth Commons W W F N N Horsetooth Commons w CO) HORSETOOTH ROAD N No Scale SITE PLAN Figure 3 Q N TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4 SITE to O (O f') O to 3/2 696/386 1/1 3/8 272/840 1/14 N O co N00 10/6 4/2 HORSETOOTH N O N to W U) c J W N to (c co in N Co Co N O N tt Jco to N ` 1 141/47 547/322 23/31 4!2). N `--189/393 173/606 .e'122/136 co O 0 co (D C9 CcpW V tD to w AM / PM SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 Table 3 Short Range Peak Hour Operation ntersection Shields/Horsetooth (signal) Horsetooth/Richmond (stop sign) NB LT/T NB RT SB LT/T SB RT EB LT WB LT Shields/Richmond (stop sign) EB LT EB RT NB LT Level of Service AM PM C C C D A A C D A A A B A A E ( C / D ) E (C/D) A A A C ( ) Level of service based upon recent delay research I Figure 6 shows the long range (2010) peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Background traffic is commensurate with that reflected in the "North Front Range Corridor Study." Traffic on Richmond Drive reflects development of Kingston Woods, 2nd Filing and traffic assignments for the other uses from the "Williamsburg PUD Site Access Study." Peak hour operation is shown in Table 4. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. Operation at the Hors etooth/ShieIds signalized intersection will be acceptable with geometric improvements. The recommended approach geometry at this intersection is: Northbound - 1 left -turn lane, 2 turn lane Southbound - 1 left -turn lane, through/right-turn Eastbound - 1 left -turn lane, 2 turn lane Westbound - 1 left -turn lane, 2 turn lane through lanes, and 1 right- 1 through lane, and 1 lane through lanes, and 1 right - through lanes, and 1 right - Operation at the Horsetooth/Richmond and Shields/Richmond intersections will be acceptable, except for left -turn exits from Richmond Drive, particularly during the afternoon peak hour. There will be some delays to these movements. These types of delays are common at arterial/local street intersections with stop sign control and is generally accepted. Signals will not be warranted at either of these locations based upon traffic projections contained in this memorandum. The north cul-de-sac has a 900 turn approximately 100 feet north of the east/west street. The design speed for residential streets in Fort Collins is 30 mph. This 90' turn will require a variance of this design speed. It is estimated that this curve will have a centerline radius of approximately 50 feet. The design speed on a curve with a 50 foot radius is calculated at 14 mph. This curve can be signed for a 10 mph advisory speed. Since this is -a -cul-de-sac and will primarily be used by residents of_the __ street itself, I recommend that this variance be granted. I recommend that good sight lines be maintained on the inside corner of the curve. Conclusions/Recommendations The following conclusions/recommendations are made with regard to the Kingston Woods PUD, 2nd Filing: - This development is expected to generate approximately 220 daily trip ends. The peak hour trip generation is expected to be 17 trip ends in the morning peak hour and 22 trip ends in the afternoon peak hour. This is less than half the generated traffic from the land uses on the same parcels in the "Williamsburg PUD Site Access Study."