Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutKINGSTON WOODS PUD FINAL - 58 91C - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSITEM NO. _4 MEETING DATE 9/ 2 8/ A 2 STAFF Kirsten Whetstone - - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD -- - STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Kingston Woods PUD, Second Filing - Final, #58-91C APPLICANT: Don Frederick Frederick Land Surveying 1528 N. Lincoln Loveland, CO 80537 OWNER: Progressive Living Structures 4190 N. Garfield Avenue Loveland, CO 80538 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a final PUD for 22 single family lots on 5.47 acres, located north of Horsetooth Road, west of Shields Street, at Richmond and Patterson Drives. The site is zoned R-P, Planned Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with a condition. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes 22 single family lots on this 5.47 acre site. The project is in substantial conformance with the approved Preliminary PUD and the amended Horsetooth Commons ODP. The project satisfies applicable criteria of the All Development Point Chart of the Land Development Guidance System. All of the lots gain access from local streets within the development. The entrance feature includes street trees, landscaping, and a low stone wall similar to that approved for Kingston Woods PUD First Filing. Along Horsetooth Road, a stone wall, street trees, and a landscaped green area will provide a buffer from the arterial street and continue the Horsetooth Road streetscape approved with Kingston Woods PUD First Filing. A variance from requirements of the Solar Orientation Ordinance was granted at preliminary. A condition regarding completion of all utility plans and engineering documents is being recommended. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT FREDERICK LAND _,JRVEYING 1528 N. Lincoln Loveland, Co. 80538 (303) 669-3652 Planning and Zoning Board City of Fort Collins, Colorado RE: Variance Request Kingston Woods, P.U.D. Second Filing Dear Planning and Zoning Board: July 31. 1992 Project No. 92-04-590 This letter is to request a variance from the requirements of the Design Criteria and Standard for Streets of said City of Fort Collins, pertaining to the angle of intersection of proposed' streets. The variance requested is to be allowed to deviate from having the street centerlines intersect at right angles, as required in Section 1.02.03.02, Page 8. of said Criteria manual. The deviation from perpendicular intersections is approximately five degrees at the intersection of Patterson Place and Richmond Drive and approximately four degrees at the intersection of Patterson Place and Patterson Court. Said standard can not be met on this particular subdivision because an efficient layout of lots does not lend itself to perpendicular street intersections. Requiring perpendicular street intersections would create a very inefficient layout on this property and.be of no value to anyone. The layout being requested with non perpendicular street intersections creates no problems with respect to public hea.lth, safety, and/or welfare. This layout creates no site d•i•st-ance-prob l ems l -and-has-a-very 1-ow-traf f-i-c count. We ask that you consider this variance request in your review of our project. Thank you for your time and consideration. R BWS/ml f M August 3, 1992 Project No: 1005-27-92 Mr. Glen Schlueter Civil Engineer City of Fort Collins Storm Water Utility P.O. Box 580 Ft. Collins, Colorado 80522 Re: Kingston Woods P.U.D. 2nd Filing; Ft. Collins, Colorado Dear Glen, We have been coordinating our drainage design for Kingston Woods 2nd Filing with Mike Jones of Northern Engineering Services who is preparing the drainage design for Kingston Woods. Our understanding from Mike, is that the Storm Water Utility has generally approved the concept , where Kingston Woods has increased detention volumes and decreased detention outlet flows. This would allow for Kingston Woods 2nd Filing storm drainage to be designed without detention. We have therefore prepared calculations for the conveyance of all storm runoff from Kingston Woods 2nd Filing without providing detention. All drainage would be directed to the extreme northwest corner of the Kingston Woods 2nd Filing site. The Kingston Woods plan is to discharge through a storm sewer along the northernmost boundary of Kingston Woods 2nd Filing to the northeast corner of Kingston Woods 2nd Filing. Then northerly through the Casa Grande property to the existing storm sewer in Laredo Lane. This is a major change from the preliminary drainage design which carried through the original Horsetooth Commons drainage concept. We suggest that all reference to the preliminary drainage report be discontinued as we had discussed at one time. Attached are the drainage and erosion control calculations for Kingston Woods 2nd Filing for your review. We have suggested to Mike Jones that our calculations and plan be included in the final revised drainage report for Kingston Woods. We will provide you a more detailed discussion of our drainage design soon. Our drainage report could be included in the appendix of Mike's drainage report, or his report in the appendix of ours, depending on timing. If you have any questions, please call. 20262 S Brian W. Shear P.E. °9 % •'�`�Q• Shear Engineering Corporation �0,�,FsS�oNA� BWS / jr cc: Mike Jones; Northern Engineering Don Frederick; Frederick Land Surveying Leo Schuester; Progeressive Living Structures 4836 S. College, Suite 12 Fort Collins, CO 80525 (303)226-5334 Kingston Woods PUD, Second Filing - Final, #58-91C September 28, 1992 P & Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: R-P; multi -family residential (Casa Grande PUD) S: R-E; single family residential (Skyline Acres) E: R-P; existing and future commercial (Horsetooth Commons PUD and Horsetooth Commons ODP) W: R-P; approved single family lots (Kingston Woods PUD) The entire 15.5 acre Horsetooth Commons PUD was annexed into the City of Fort Collins in 1980. The original Preliminary Plan, known as the Williamsburg PUD, was approved by the Planning and Zoning Board in February, 1982 for multi -family units with commercial and retail uses. In October, 1986, a Master Plan (ODP) was approved for a mix of residential and commercial uses. The ODP was amended in 1988 to allow single family units on a portion of the plan. A plan, known as the Residences at Horsetooth Commons PUD, was given preliminary and final approval in 1988 for a mix of multi- family and single family units on the northern section of the subject property. In 1987, the Grease Monkey PUD was approved for auto related uses on Tract A and The Market at Horsetooth Commons PUD was approved for a mix of commercial and retail uses on Tract D. In 1990, Lot 5 of The Market at Horsetooth Commons was approved for retail/office and specialty auto retail uses. The Planning and Zoning Board voted to approve the Preliminary Plan for Kingston Woods Second Filing PUD at the August hearing. A condition concerning notification of grospactive--home-buyers-that the property to the east may be commercial in the future, was placed on the approval. The commercial property owners were notified and it was suggested that they post a sign on their property indicating future commercial development. At this time there has not been a formal response. The applicant has placed a note on both site and landscape plans indicating that the property to the east is designated as commercial on the Horsetooth Commons ODP. Staff finds that the intent of the condition of preliminary approval has been met. 2. Land Use The proposed use is for 22 single family lots on 5.47 acres. The gross density is 4.02 dwelling units per acre. Lots range in size from 5,457 to 10,961 square feet with an average lot size of approximately 7,640 square feet. The proposed density of 4.02 Kingston Woods PUD, Second Filing - Final, #58-91C September 28, 1992 P & Z Meeting Page 3 DU/acre is supported by a score of 60% on the Residential Uses Point Chart of the Land Development Guidance System. Points were awarded for proximity to a transit stop (on Horsetooth at Shields), proximity to a neighborhood park (Rossborough Park), and for contiguity to existing urban development. The project is in substantial conformance with the approved Preliminary PUD and amended Horsetooth Commons ODP. 3. Design All lots will be served by local streets within the subdivision. The greenbelt area along Horsetooth Road will be landscaped with a variety of coniferous and deciduous trees and a low stone wall feature to provide a buffer for lots backing onto Horsetooth Road. An entry feature at *Patterson Place and Richmond Drive will reflect the same stone wall design planned for Horsetooth Road. Street trees will be provided along Horsetooth Road and Richmond Drive. The landscaped areas in Tract A (along Horsetooth and Richmond) and along Patterson Place will be maintained by a Homeowner's Association. All other landscaping, including street trees provided on individual lots, will be the responsibility of the individual homeowner. Fencing guidelines pertain to the entire project. The fence height shall be 6' at the rear lot lines of lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 2 (bordering Horsetooth Road). The fence height shall be 416" at the rear and/or side lot line of lots 1, 21 3, and 9 of Block 2, and 1, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of Block 1, bordering Richmond Drive and Patterson Drive. Fencing at 5' or 6' heights shall be allowed at all other interior rear or side lot lines. include the following: Front: Sixteen feet, provided that the length of driveway, from the front of the garage to the back of walk, is at least 20'. Side: A minimum of three feet, provided that there is a minimum of 10' separating structures. Corner Side: Fifteen feet, provided that no lot takes access from Patterson Place, although houses may front on Patterson Place. Rear: A minimum of 151. It is the intent of the applicant to blend this project, both architecturally and with the landscape treatment along Horsetooth, with the approved Kingston Woods PUD first filing to the west. Kingston Woods PUD, Second Filing - Final, #58-91C September 28, 1992 P & Z Meeting Page 4 4. Neiahborhood_Compatibilit A neighborhood meeting was not held for this project. Single family lots as proposed are compatible with the existing residential development to the north and south, to planned residential development to the west, and to the planned neighborhood convenience shopping and commercial center to the east. A note has been added to the plans indicating that the Market at Horsetooth Commons, which is directly east of this project, is designated for commercial uses on the approved ODP. 5. Storm Drainage Runoff flows for a majority of the site will be routed to a detention pond on the Kingston Woods PUD first filing property. Drainage flows from both Kingston Woods Filings will be piped to an existing stormwater detention pond north of Laredo Lane. Off site drainage easements are dedicated on the final plat. Final drainage, grading, and erosion control plans have been reviewed and accepted by the Stormwater Utility. 6. Solar Orientation The Solar Orientation Ordinance requires that 65% of the lots within a single family PUD or subdivision be oriented to within 30 degrees of a true east -west line. Kingston Woods Second Filing provides solar orientation for 12 lots, out of a total of 22, for 55%. The applicant submitted a variance request from the 65% orientation requirement. The variance was granted by the Planning and Zoning Board on August 31, 1992 for the Preliminary PUD. __RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that Kingston Woods Second Filing, Final PUD, complies with the Amended Horsetooth Overall Development Plan. The Final PUD is in substantial conformance with the Preliminary PUD. The proposed density is justified by the performance on the Residential Uses Point Chart and criteria of the All Development Chart of the Land Development Guidance System have been addressed. The condition of preliminary approval has been addressed. Staff, therefore, recommends approval of Kingston Woods, Second Filing, Final PUD, #58-91C, subject to the following condition: i. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit development final plan upon the condition that the development agreement, final utility plans, and final P.U.D., plans for the planned unit development be negotiated between the developer and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the second monthly meeting (November 16, 1992) of the Planning and Zoning Board following the meeting at which this Kingston Woods PUD, Second Filing - Final, #58-91C September 28, 1992 P & Z Meeting Page 5 planned unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it shall first find that there exists with respect to said planned unit development final plan certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which require the granting of the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner of developer of such property and provided that such extension can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to be included in the development agreement, the developer may present such dispute to the Board for resolution if such presentation is made at the next succeeding or second succeeding monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table any such decision, until both the staff and the developer have had reasonable time to present sufficient information to the Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects to table the decision, it shall also extend the term of this condition until the date such decision is made). If this condition is not met within the time established herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final approval of this planned unit development shall become null and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date that the condition is met, for purposes of determining the vesting of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II, Division 3, of the City Code, the "final decision" of the Board shall be deemed-to-have-been-made-at-the_time-o.f this conditional approval; however, in the event that a dispute is presented to the Board for resolution regarding provisions to be included in the development agreement, the running of time for the filing of an appeal of such "final decision" shall be counted from the date of the Board's decision resolving such dispute. 0] ►` \•A'LOZ0] D TRACT I �CASA GRANDE P LI. ZONED: RP —� � i� �a IX ..91Yti 'AIM ^�. Sz �sz � l f l Umna usRr eYnnR '"ne m uYm w• �� t TRACT C - I�� r DETENTION POND AREArV3• 1 + I _ -8r642tl 1r. 6 a ©mIu.�l1�(� KINGSTON WOODS P.U.D. 2nd FILING BLOCK 1 AND TRACT C OF HORSETOOTH COMMONS P.U.D. LOT 3 II I 1 unnr�¢._ THE MARKET AT tl HORSETo3TA-CO-UNI 3 P.U.D. ZONED: RP or/ A r sm wsYeRrosYeePamY a tltl \i\i. u \ % L�,_ - �� \\ Ir ICI DOInO6ru6a�apPon • I \<tvMaserr oetlarR 1 rMQCK Z (, 1 I 4 0 1 I i n LOT N • ,`, w,�fr. ,` I r `` /� 4 \\ THE YARKEf AT yuu �I u I HORSETOOTH \ _ \ y COMMONS P.0 D. I�I \ �ss� \ ar. 5 • `\ // si \ \ \l ° �' o . II u LOT 5 ZONED: RP THE MARKET AT -ROOSETOOOTH- J / G S A \ W L--,� SAC \ �� L - - - J L u tl I,uu' n a I I I rut COMMONS P.UD. 1 ZONED: RP FINAL P.U.D. SITE PLAN I I MILLS i0 CRY 11YR3 2 �� N.I�I TRACT t � SKYLINE ACRES SUBDMS 0 ZONED: RE 77 ttl ,-?n, \ DATA TABLE � »n — _ — o.�ws mnwuna I� T� I I owwomr wsa,n®ans mrruY usm YYavanwv,wiuwuvr m,n,osuova�wr wwolie u m iar n +s amn a iH w♦ro m srmai�.mvw,anmuraiwava. ..n..n_ en nei.aaomwr I PSI I TRACT III I mw ww I CJI I SKYLINE ACRES waa,wrm raw ` Tit ZONED: R onM SIGNATURE BLOCK s. FREDERICK LAND SURVEYING m2r. esumsutlw muonm.ee. ism .. .xrtw Yews. uYrtlMY. caaYm e0Y KINGSTON ROODS P.U.D 2nd FLING SD1 wws:tw,sw-sn TRACT 1 ZONED- RP eaMnwvax� ..� alb - _ �_ '�Z�—_—• — � —\ ' 3 ZTRACT C DETENTION POND AREA TRACT 0 1 _ m wn ° � If I pr P 'ITLR90M COURT IF KINGSTON WOODS P.U.D. 2nd FILING BLOCK 1 AND TRACT C OF HORSETOOTH COMMONS P.U.D. rowoia.o v,a),re mru ! ,ouno . 2 .N... ,ve....,..a.r..e..l.xwel.nrx..! a wnru ri ice. ..euc�c:uocrr. o�. w. mrrc ro..oa .r• en.sa r rw.m rr eer.I .-.wn . ��� .vn �w.ul�r.uwnrew.,ocowaownx wr..KS mwneo,a.wnr°ex.u!u.aoulcw.lwo tAl.n®pull..rlxYM.'.110Y UpxW1OIM W[.xK.x04.3 a. •,.ular.e..cm s.x..�w..r.. e. aer m'eawxee..oex°e aem•an.r.o�.n-c2.n*.e.ee.m.x L— MAW LW !uaweoee o,«w.awm•wr. .w nunsi c...........co ox.x. C�� \ x / ,' , - �. \ \ '✓� eesrmseeonwresauw,m �� , /f I r � I 12 / � � er♦",.� � a..awvame.o.nu,e.r+wawm.vrx..u.naxixa.o�.. �� __ I r� ? �.+"♦ wn.a,.)ow.,w+.vm.,e.wealxe.wi.e ax...ix.,x.xr. ..rao to // \ NO ♦ •% �v.oc.wo.cm..n.emrwwwcv.).u..xrs.c • ra�___+� __. 1N \ \ ...♦''=i FINAL P.U.D. a r<\ .�,---T v� LANDSCAPE PLAN 2 � �___ 2 '�♦♦. ,,. .,w,wermmnal o.. rowrexexea.lo wox ro.x. vNxw. x �) (� --�., e,ene 0 I♦ �� ,w.w aw.vx a... wmw....wcrox.rn.... f.(// LOT 3 11 I AT 9 ` �.'/ �� \ RORAT � P.0 D. ! fY0 �' LANDSCAPE NOTES _ J If (elf �.J�Ee ZONED. RP a -� ;,C ; �• r i—� $Vllnryy.. S; , /r \ )oRMwaaA.anmx !� ) ppely. sunioeeO.<m.o ° liia ii' ) ri I I 8 e!e t No,cex+w en • ' -ell 7 �j1/N \x /rBL�s UKK.2 n o I:Ni \ �w wue.ae.uu '•�aa„ y01' � � ®ir-eaacr r_�.•�_� Jh� I L` i F wryer tx) M� I THE LOT 4 NARKET nP i l .0 NORSETOOTH \ s / � `� i/ z \ i CDY1lDNS P U ➢ — BID 3 '� ``e // \5 I.1 `\4 (x Y . `1i ZONED: RP Tim LOT 5 MARxeT 'NONE WALL ELEVATION ° s ` p7xJ I I \ / % e , s C0IONONS P U O ;-� . J L—_—Jl_ Yr lu ZONED'. RP ne. ry 2x) n x. a R. _ -u___ __ .r Nc !>w w. xxrcua xa eawx•. crown � ro�..nr x...a lxv.rw _ _ - �(O1�ETb6TA'R6AIL (u.w.N%� - " - — — - - — _ — - — Li Ll IJ xm ue\ L1 mm —T o :t TRACT 1 I , py o , TRACT 11I�� SI(YI.INE ACRES SUBDTV�IS-7Ip7}7 I S I SKYLINE ACRES SU IVL410N :aae.iu:..♦ion".•xe.a.'�...a�wr.��°.w.�c..e�x ZONED: RE 3 ZONED: is a va..n.eo.iln u eve im uee aIo rn STOt� WALL DETAIL FENCE DETAIL II I II �• exew FREDERICK LAND SURVEYING "'•""^ )^' ^�" _ �°ijYl, r o�.r�.vA�_ PMriaa Imin fnmtmm. En 1. x...nxu, w .., awwm wee MNGSI.ON FOODS P, U.D. 2nd PILING n-w-w_ I 1 . # 5S-9 / C h�1 5jon bjoo 15 ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY CRITERION Is the criterion applicable? Will the criterion be satistled? - If no, please explain 0���ca, �',°e0> Yes No NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY 1. Social Compatability 2. Neighborhood Character 3. Land Use Conflicts 4. Adverse Traffic Impact PLANS AND POLICIES 5. Comprehensive Plan PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY 6. Street Capacity �/ V 7. Utility Capacity 8. Design Standards v �/ 9. Emergency Access \/--j ./ 10. Security Lighting 11. Water Hazards RESOURCE PROTECTION 12. Soils & Slope Hazard ✓ 13. Significant Vegetation 14. Wildlife Habitat 15. Historical Landmark V 16. Mineral Deposit ►� 17. Eco-Sensitive Areas 18. Agricultural Lands ✓ ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS 19. Air Quality V 20. Water Quality V V 21. Noise �/ ✓ 22. Glare & Heat ✓ 23. Vibrations 24. Exterior Lighting 25. Sewages & Wastes V SITE DESIGN -26. Community-Organization V, 27. Site Organization v �/ 28. Natural Features ✓ �/ 29. Energy Conservation ✓ �/ 30,Shadows ✓ `/ 31. Solar Access ✓ ✓ 32. Privacy V 33. Open Space Arrangement 34. Building Height 35. Vehicular Movement ✓ �/ 36. Vehicular Design 37. Parking ✓ �% 38. Active Recreational Areas 39. Private Outdoor Areas A1/ 40, Pedestrian Convenience ✓ �/ 41. Pedestrian Conflicts 42. Landscaping/Open Areas ✓ V 43. Landscaping/Buildings ✓ 44. Landscaping/Screening ✓ 45. Public Access 46. Signs -12-