Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPINECONE PUD FORT COLLINS HIGH SCHOOL SITE PLAN ADVISORY REVIEW - 60 91B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - EROSION CONTROL LETTER/REPORTz Meline & Irelan, Inc. Consulting Engineers 4710 South College Avenue r. L N.- Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 (303 (303) 226-2323 (303) 226-2428 FAX October 15, 1992 Kathy Malers City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Erosion Control Plan for New Fort Collins High School Dear Kathy: Enclosed fine the Erosion Control Report and Plan for the above referenced project. As mentioned during various conversations with personnel from our office, we are proposing to use a Soil Sealant on parking lots and access roads in the project. These areas will be finished to subgrade and treated with this emulsion per the Specification which is included in Appendix B for your review. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, MELINE & IRELAN, I Victor R. Malin Jr. P.E. Enc. VRM/1ik i EFFECTIVENESS CALCULATIONS PROJECT: FC �}�--------------------------------------STANDARD FORM B � COMPLETED BY: cj A (%cur'Nl DATE: I1 /i? Erosion Control C-Factor P-Factor Method Value Value Comment --------------- ------------------------------------------- �,vM,. k.-- 0.01 1.00 IkY�sf�N AL kk O.oG 1.00 0.5o 5;14 FerLA- lYmer 00 1,00 v.50 0.q0-(opSo; -P -cv, r Gop 0.45 I. oo It --------I'e MAJOR(. ------------------------------ PS ( AREA ------- — ---------------- BASIN( I.SUB (n) BASIN (Ac) ---CALCULATIONS y s;11 �t,u.. -9••3"D� I rp 0,11 x2.> )J/z.l 0.1� NTD ���� �(p •,5o x 2.1 1 0 50 EFF : [I - (O.5o3e.0-1Q]Xt0 94.5�LA �JnJI s�.f I. o AL Crop 0.52 A'c. (5A-xkpdt.) H/i� C-{-ac.%r'�iz•°Sx,.00 .�O.Vgx0.52��q.3o �Cc--t3 x a•5)IA.30 - I 0.57-x0. 29 )1 c too = 61.9 <" owt 9 ------------------------------------------- --------------- DI/SF-B:1989 (c RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STANDARD EVALUATION ------------------------- PROJECT: Fc ►{ '_3 5 L,,,L 60 s) n 1 STANDARD FORM A COMPLETED BY: GA 0AIAIrIJ DATE: Q/qt 92 -------------------------------------------------------------------- DEVELOPED ERODIBILITYI Asb I Lsb I Ssb I Lb I Sb I PS SUBBASIN + ZONE I (ac). I (ft) I (a) .1(feet) I (A) 1 (A) ---------`--------- 100 j %�io� -- -------I- ----1-------I-------1-------I------ lot �.:��. I y .50 1 L400 I 12. I t'ie 113 I 5 1 I 0. 7 t. I I 10 2 /`ice �' y.07 7 �l0 j I °L 217 i 0.3 t it i '' ! 2. 55 400 I 11 1 -11 0.19 1 13.z.8 1.914 ti .79.2 ----------------- IDI/SF-A:1989 I b �( RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STANDARD EVALUATION I---------------------------------------- == ------------------------ PROJECT: F -C R 5 ` 5 A2 STANDARD FORM A (COMPLETED BY: Gi` l n/na� DATE: I--------------------------------------------------------------------- DEVELOPEDIEROOIBILITY SUBBASIN ZONE J 1 oC9 " IO7 I " )06 ! , 1I I Asb i (.85 1220 2.58 1 �1.15 1170 0.11 i Lsb I (ft) i 12,z`�I G>oo j 2-7 0 I zoo .i Ssb I (') 1(feet) 1.oO{ 1. 2 "b 1 i Lb I 1 q�l 175 I 7 5 I ZZ zl 10.1o1 Sb I -(-)--1 0-29I 0.33 I 19.3o I I 1337 I l0.30 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I { -------------- ------------------------------------------------------- DI/SF-A:1989 RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STANDARD EVALUATION PROJECT: rc—N S 5L.LL3ir\ 5 STANDARD FORM A COMPLETED BY: OALL��l DATE: 9/9 /q2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- DEVELOPEDIERODIBILITYI Asb ( Lsb ( Ssb Lb I Sb I PS SUBBASIN I ZONE ( (ac) I (ft) 1 (a) .((feet) I (a*) I ► (A) --------- 3 5(/%� -- -------- I ------- I ------- 1.051 l c o I ------- 1 2.4 1 i ------- 00 I ------- 1 1. ZO 1 ------- E� 3 A 1 U. 23 •30 8. 5 i 9 1 0.93 FU I C.a O.�II I zi0 I y.5 I yI o.881 i.c(z_I E& 31 I ------------------------------------- I/SF-A:1989 k:. RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STANDARD EVALUATION --------------------------------------------------------------------� PROJECT: rc N S S ��oa3;n }� LI STANDARD FORM A COMPLETED BY: &n, A. OcLl,\J DATE: q/914 ------------ --------- -L------------------- --------------------------- DEVELOPEDIERODIBILITYI Asb I Lsb I Ssb I Lb I Sb I PS SUBBASIN I ZONE I (ac) 1 (ft) I (A) I(feet) 1 (A) 1 (0) 1 ----Jiod�r {e z i --i--I 1—-i--1Z2 i o.Lt3 i---- --- 59 yoo I I Z-70 j i'D j SCSI 0'zI I I I I I I y7 I p•yl I I 115 I " 100M 13� 12 •C� l zpl I 77o I I-C9 + ys� I I F G i2- I O.Z �i 1 3 I I I I I 9 �_51 I �� ; ► O. 1 sc� 0.09 iI 1 I 3 7 1Co.oz, i i -------------------------------------- I/SF-A:1989 I I_ — RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STANDARD EVALUATION --------------------------6 ----- ------------ -------------------- PROJECT: (�LNS Ste%_ IIc+Sir� /i`J oPJo+� S4OJkr�I�STANDARD FORM A COMPLETED BY: GA Oc�t.hna�--------------DATE_- I q 2 ------------------------------------------------- DEVELOPEDIERODIBILITYI Asb I Lsb I Ssb I Lb I Sb I PS SUBBASIN ZONE I (ac) I (ft) .I (%) I(feet) 1(_)1 (%) ---------l------------------I-------I-------I-------I----I-------I Q5 i j-(ocl '-I.5q 152-0 1 i i 1,2,.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------i IDI/SF-A:1989 EFFECTIVENESS CALCULATIONS -------------------------------------- --------------------------------� r PROJECT: FCIAS II STANDARD FORM B COMPLETED BY: G f + hnc ( DATE: qb lqI -. Erosion Control C-Factor P-Factor Method Value Value Coimnent --------------------------------------------- RX4Yjr-u I I+ 0.01 I.O0 --------- N-Y � ,;,fro... /'q.nitl� p.oe� I • �� (/•'er.o- Cw�r) 00 0.50 dGrz 50; l . 00 0.90 (i��ri aTer o1 �1cq t 5o c ls;d. Sail �a�on� �•IO 1.00 MAJOR PS ---------------- SUB AREA ----------------------------- BASIN (o) I BASIN (Ac) I . CALCULATIONS Do?�— ----3�K ---- -- --:----------S- .. 1 ILL tw k .--r.o ac_ y•$q ! u.ox lafg) +( 7.OX 0.0(- -_ x 9 0)] T-o)f(,.Za._. 87.61 ok pG „� „ 7.9 7 c �,, i Gros . p.1-9 Ac . '50 SUIP�� .58 1 N Ct0,01X.Z.97)t(O.Occ0m,)+(Q.ION _ p o4 2 `i B L(.5 x�{.5�l•Si 0.50 [I-(0.0+-, 0.547 160 IDI/SF-B:1989 EFFECTIVENESS CALCULATIONS ( 1PROJECT: ------------------------------------ Fc N s ---- ��,bb =�� .. --------------------- -------� STANDARD FORM B COMPLETED BY: G A WLL� DATE: 1 !I/q? Erosion Control C-Factor P-Factor Method Value Comment ----------------_----Value ------------ oo ---------- EAl"A' wl--+,E�b6I� • J I MAJOR BASINI SUB I BASINI ----------------- I/SF-B:1989 AREA (Ac) o .'73 -------------------------------------------- CALCULATIONS ---------------------------------------- uTQ c-ter = U r.z s o. oe 0.0 B ►1.73 116 1r•� 3 EFFECTIVENESS CALCULATIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- �. I PROJECT: FCNS STANDARD FORM B =COMPLETED BY: DATE: �( I Erosion Control C-Factor P-Factor Method Value Value Comment ----------------------------------------------- �a� /W, lics 0,10 I.00 505 1.00 0 (AIl 0.5 L i 0. q l0 PCYI n.Ltt� 07 3aK Ste, ( .00 �l 5011 S«.1 _ k 0.01 1, Go C I`�'--------! =Q"--------- °-$O=1�------------ MAJORI PS SUB AREA I BASIN ( ) I BASIN (Ac) I CALCULATIONS ---SQ1(-:�1�,,-�----------- --------- :I.50. 6Ll 5 . Cp ! A� ; Ac- thaw G , (--5a%) ;y1,:3o Ar k✓TD I.rfi7 p.= .3ox "0 y.l�)]x1561xi S�Co 10C• 813. Ok- 71.7 rfT-' 1. u - c;. A J-) ---------------- DI/SF-B:1989 s (PROJECT: EFFECTIVENESS CALCULATIONS I---------------------------------------------------------------------- i FLuS STANDARD FORM B I f1 I COMPLETED BY: G,4 OCLZhnaI DATE: Ll�( �t2 Erosion Control C-Factor P-Factor Method Value Value Comment I -.----------------------------- ----------- �y--------------- I Sn� �¢c,.�an� �. �� 1 . CC) � ar�ci,.y L+.r 0-OC9 I O� JU 0.50 (011 oA0 gib I --------------------------------------------------------------------- I MAJORI PS I SUB II AREA BASINI (mm) IBASINI (Ac) CALCULATIONS -Z. G9 D --- a,� -G�w � ---- 3.6Ac 8)- � c -----, I /qt iLL - —1. 3 Wry L-�'Acivr = r(•oCax7.3��C.10 XCo.C�)+(�.ox3'� =0.z8 ►.STD Q"�uc' j.40�3.8)f��.ox 13.g�5o1,1 .+ -- -- --�--- .. ��� _ I - (0.2Sx 0.3�)�x1o0= 8`I• � �� Ok- I I ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I HOI/SF-8:1989 .eu) The following report details erosion control measures for a 75 acre tract in east Fort Collins. The area is to be the site of the New Fort Collins High School, and a portion of the proposed City of Fort Collins Park. The development site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Horsetooth and Timberline Roads. I. Site Characteristics The existing site has been in agricultural use for a number of years and irrigation ditches and laterals currently cross the area in numerous locations. The land tends to slope gradually eastward to the Fossil Creek Reservoir Inlet Ditch. The Site is currently covered by wheat stubble. The crop was harvested in late summer of 1992 and had been irrigated in the spring. The wheat stubble is well established and will help to reduce erosion hazards until overlot grading begins in November of 1992. Currently, the property is bordered on the east and north sides by open agricultural land. Poudre River Power Authority (PRPA) and National Cash Register (NCR) are west of the site, across Timberline Road. The Dakota Ridge housing development on the east end of the school site, is in the preliminary phases of overlot grading and houses will appear in the spring of 1993. The Fox Meadows subdivision is located south of the school site. Parcels to the north are owned by W. W. Reynolds and current plans call for single and multifamily units to begin construction within the next few years. The erodibility maps of Fort Collins show the proposed development site to be within the "moderate" zone for wind and rainfall erosion potential. This projept_has._:a construction period of approximately 'two and one-half years. The overlot grading is scheduled to begin in November of 1992. A large part of the erosion control measures planned for the site will be installed under Bid Package No. 1 "Demolition and Overlot Grading". The only temporary measures that will depend on another contract are installation of the gravel inlet filters. These filters will be installed after the construction of the storm sewers which will occur under the Utilities Bid Package beginning immediately following Overlot Grading. II. Erosion Control Measures A. Structural Measures Structural erosion control measures will consist mainly of a sediment basin at the location of the future detention pond. The overlot grading project will begin Page 1 RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STANDARD EVALUATION ----------------------- PROJECT: ------- - ------------------------------- F'L� 5 5��'n i3 STANDARD FORM A COMPLETED BY: G ���. DATE: --------------------------------------------------------------------- DEVELOPEDIERODIBILITYI Asb I Lsb I Ssb I Lb I Sb I PS SUBBASIN ZONE I (ac) I (ft) I (A) (feet) I (n) I (A) 30, j 2,01. i z i Q'12 ,55 1700 O.S� 1P58 1 0.�5 I kf� ! i ! �°O 0• .R 1 �8 . o ------------------------------------ ------------------ ----------- ---- IDI/SF-A:1989 RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STANDARD EVALUATION PROJECT Oc N-5 St •Ib 1 s n STANDARD FORM A COMPLETED BY: DATE: f0 ------------------------------------------------- I-------------------- DEVELOPEDERODIBILITYI Asb I Lsb I Ssb I Lb I Sb I PS SUBBASIN ZONE I (ac) I (ft) I (%) 1(feet) 1 (a) 1 (A) --------- - —-------------- - ------ - -------I------- L� 2,5 131 i 0, GJ 13 . &01 C9s01 z s 1 z�� 1 I• y Z I Cas 1 yu0 FCC C9 1 n , 1 I I 8 1 p z3 I 3-7 1 i 1.03 i 150 2- i 1 i o rr , �q 10?5 I a.�a I I I y�q 12 &5 I S► LI --------------------------------------------------------------------- iDI/SF-A:1989 RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STANDARD EVALUATION ------------- ------- ?-------- --- ---------------------- PROJECT: V-L1j5 5vbi�as:n i�3 c4m- P-jw y STANDARD FORM A COMPLETED BY: GA 06"^ I DATE: q la 9Z- --------------------------------------------------------------------- DEVELOPEDIERODIBILITYI Asb I Lsb I Ssb I Lb I Sb I PS ZONEI(ac) (ft) W I(feet) I (, A )SUBBASIN --------- 3 � I --------I----- I 11,13 11 ------- ------- Ii i ------- I i --Z8. 5 I -------- ----------------------------- -------------------------- ----- I/SF-A:1989 I( RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STAI ------------------------------------ PROJECT: Fc HS COMPLETED BY: -------------------------------------- OEVELOPED ERODIBILITYI Asb I Lsb SUSBASIN—{---ZONE----I (ac) ( (ft) ------ I------- %.rxr.5��� I � i3 io, 331 tea. ✓ { 1. 06 { 95 I�) wP3{ wP2,►�3 { 13o0 32.0 AL IDARD EVALUATION ------------------ STANDARD FORM A DATE: ------------------------------- Ssb I Lb I Sb I PS --(4%) .I(feet) I (I% 1 (A) z { 18 { 0.39 { 1,6 ZC, 0.31 I I I 1. 3 L 3 { O.qo I I I I I.51 1 qq I O.L.o lzgo j �B�IZg`t ------------------------------ I/SF-A:1989 --------------- 4 RAINFALL PERFORMANCE STAR -------------- ----------- ---------- - PROJECT: )=C. ws Q° +COMPLETED BY: GA OoLl"v-t I-------------------------------------- [DEVELOPEDIEROOIBILITYI Asb I Lsb I SUBBASIN- ZONE I (ac) I (ft) I I S�uFtae. -- --------- I I ------- i I ------- I 13�1,353C9 , + I 2.05 1 ZOO b8 1-0,901550 I I 1 � wP'�I III 5 I zs n I � , j� � ! 3 rJ� ln�p-I,1✓�8 I UPq, wP S 1✓5 Q. 32 L WG5, uvq 13. Q2- WG Nv9 W� icy, urn I :, 15" " 2. 85 �50 wc,co�ti��o -Vic,1 �, G,t,15, u� i9 7. 33 -- -I I DARD EVALUATION STANDARD FORMA DATE: jID 9z ----Sb---i--PS--- Ssb Lb ( e) I (feet) I (A) I W zOL 1 33 1 0.z3 II I• �° I I I 15 I 7k 10.13 I 4 0.16 zoo 1 °L 135 I O_00 0,13 3GO I I I I I I z.c"o 3 • `c DI/SF-A:1989 APPENDIX B Section 02930 Soil Sealant Part 1 - General 1.1 Description A. This work shall consist of furnishing and installing a soil sealant for erosion control of parking lots and roads to be protected from wind and water erosion. 1.2 Related Work A. Division 2 - Site Work 1. Section 02210 - Site Grading 2. Section 02970 - Landscape Maintenance Part 2 - Materials 2.1 Liquid Acrylic Emulsion A. Sealant derived from a blend of liquid co -polymers for use in binding & stabilization of soil particles. B. Soil Master WR or approved equivalent. 2.2 Water A. Free of salts, alkaline, petroleumioils, pesticides, herbicides and aquacides. 2.3 Mixer ---- — - A. Contractor shall use commercial type hydro -seeder for the application of sealant. Equipment shall have a built-in agitation system with an operating capacity sufficient to agitate, suspend and homogeneously mix slurry. 1. Distribution Lines shall be large enough to prevent stoppage and to provide even distribution of sealant over ground. 2. Pump capacity shall be a minimum of 150 psi at the nozzle. 3. Slurry Tank shall have a minimum capacity of 1000 gallons and shall be mounted on a traveling unit which will place the sealant tank and spray nozzles within sufficient proximity to the areas to be treated so as to provide uniform distribution without waste. NFCHS 10/14/92 02930-1 PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 GENERAL A. If enough time has elapsed between soil preparation and sealant operations to allow any hard or smooth surfaces to develop, scarify these areas before operations begin. Scarify to a depth of 2 inches. B. If the soil is in loose powder dust condition, settle by artificial watering before sealing. Soil moisture content should be 75% minimum of optimal soil moisture content. 3.2 APPLICATION TEMPERATURES AND TIMES A. Soil sealant shall not be applied to hard or frozen subgrade. Soil temperatures shall be a minimum of 35° F and rising before sealant operations begin B. Sealant operation shall not begin until air temperatures have reached a minimum of 40" F. Operation shall cease a minimum of four (4) hours before sunset to allow the emulsion to set-up and form a smooth impermeable crust. 3.3 RATE OF APPLICATION A. Sealant 1. A minimum of 100 gallons/acre. B. Water 1. 900 Gallonstacre (minimum). 3.4 Sealing Method A. Sealant shall be applied by hydroseeder, or other approved method that will provide a uniform and even distribution of sealant. 3.5 Maintenance -- — - A. Begin maintenance immediately after sealant operations and continue until final^ acceptance. 1. Maintenance shall consist of re -application of soil sealant mbrture to areas damaged by wind and/or water erosion, vehicles or other causes. 2. Such areas shall be repaired and the condition and grade shall be re- established prior to application of sealant and shall be as directed by the Construction Manager's Authorized Representatives. 3.6 Protection A. Keep equipment, vehicles and foot traffic off all sealant areas NFCHS 10/14/92 02930-2 NFCHS Damaged materials shall be replaced and all areas restored to original condition. "' END OF SECTION '** 10/14/92 02930-3 .� - - \• ~- -• L..•et• ems. .•y y`..y.r �•C:� �• .i •. �� ems'` .. +� '. �'.S - +.. ��• t`. . �_41ilkL& ta � ` • � C,� � � ��. •- + � �- , : -mil ��_ ` r'- , ` • �� . • .• . • �- .-...' �_ 4 . . So - �.. •'i ..- �,3 .��-`. � 1 Z. � ��:,..?I' '� � � '.• lam- '�'.1i �-' - SOIL MASTER WR _ THE SMARTEST WAY:. �. TO STOP r .AV SOIL EROSION. •�` i '.`-I � � •° �,+`. +.r �,�i • � • is ,i i?..� ��. a � • = bra "-ems`" ,�' =�' � �„-�'�• _ -�..: ,� �.; ',+_ ..=� ' � "+ :. - � � •'��►w�,.� L'4•t•~ � �_�• � ram•. �_'.•�. .\���ir� •;' 77 „` ���'�, ,vJ• +. _.*41jpfig_- ♦ � .•�,�;� �.• ov _ � �•Vp ! .��'- ♦ Ate+. It Erosion Control Report Table of Contents I. Site Characteristics II. Erosion Control Measures A. Structural Measures B. Vegetative Measures III. Seasonal Control and Maintenance Appendix A Effectiveness and Performance Standard Calculations Appendix B Soil Sealant Information I w • � NOW THERE'S A FAST, I1's YOUR SOIL EXACT w Erosion control doesn't have to be a time-consuming operation. Now you can cover acres in hours, not days. You can lock down topsoil, establish vegetation. And for a lot less than the cost of other methods. Soil Master WR`"' is the height of technology in soil stabilization. Fast, inexpensive and completely effective. Spray application. Soil Master WR is a blend of liquid co -polymers (withTripolycate) -you simply spray it on. Mixed with water, it bonds soil to create a tough, water-resistant membrane. Use it as is, for treatment against erosion. But you needn't stop there. Thick or thin: the choice is yours. Soil Master WR is flexible -you blend it just the way you want: Thick will give you maximum control. Thin it, and you have a tremendously effective-tackifier-in hydroseeding and mulching. Soil Master WR forms a semi -permeable, transparent crust, letting in just enough water to ensure proper plant growth. Later, the same crust provides a solid foundation for plant roots. Normal application rates are 50 to 100 gallons of Soil Master WR per acre, mixed with 1,800 to 3,600 gal- lons of water. You adjust the additive and water dilution ratio to fit your soil composition and application needs. Dust abatement and sand control. Soil Master WR works just as well against wind erosion. The crust seals in even tiny particles of dust -and helps you get a handle on wind-blown dust and sand. Any site, anywhere in the world. We've put Soil Master WR to the test all over the world - Central and South America, the Middle East, Mex- ico, the Pacific Rim. It's the major soil and slope stabilization method used in the planned communities of Mission Viejo and Aliso Viejo - two of the largest developments in Southern California. Whatever your environ- ment, whatever your site condition, we can customize Soil Master WR to protect against post -fire erosion, establish vegetation, allow water infiltration -in short, to match your specific need. EXPENSIVE WAY TO KEEP WHERE IT BELONGS. 13.00 12.00 11.00 i �I 0.20 0.15 COST EFFECTIVENESS OF VARIOUS EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS ON 3:1 SLOPES Products were tested from May,1987 through September,1987 in Parker, Colorado. Note that all of the products tested are effective in controlling erosion but vary widely in the cost to establish vegetation. SOIL MASTER WR applied as a tackifier on 1-tonlacre of hay mulch was the most cost -elf icient method tested with a retail price of 1 cents per square yard. 0.10 JUTE MESH STRAW MAT POLYESTER 0.05 1 d BLANKET b POLYETHYLENE MAT-3 LAYER BIOFABRIC MAT Soil surface condition of 1988 test plots on 1.5:1 slopes at Parker, Colorado. A B C D E F G SOIL MASTER WR and hay (G) had a runoff value per inch of precipitation far less than the control plot (C) or either of the hydrau- lic mulches (paper and wood fiber - A and B). SOIL MASTER WR works not only as a tackifier keeping hav in place but acts as a viable sealer of soil particles when used done -see lower left corner of the ESSI test plot. Also, note that when the geotextiles-jute mesh (D). a coconut mat (E) and a polyester blanket (F)- became saturated with water the resulting weight caused the wood test frame to buckle. $40 $35 $30 SOIL LOSS after 4 Mo. (Ions/acre) $25 .RETAIL PRICEiSO.YD. Reflects price of product and staples but does not $20 include costs associated with installation such as WOOD FIBER labor, water, etc. MULCH S15 . PERENNIAL GRASS MASTER WR ESTABLISHMENT COST SOIL anI MAS Hay sic Costs/pound/acre of perennial grass harvested from 1987testing plots. $5 The cost? A lot less than you think. Soil Master WR costs just a fraction of other methods. Plus, it's environ- mentally safe. Soil Master WR is non- toxic, non-flammable, non-polluting —and absolutely worry -free. To place your order, just call. Call us. We'll give you information on prices and application rates for your specific needs. SOIL MASTER WR Y, environmental es soil systems, ine. 13_34 Whistler Avenue, Granada Hills, CA 91344 (818) 368.4115 FAX (818) 368-9393 Member of the International Erosion Control Association Member of the Soil and Water Consen-arion Society F. 041 ' Physical properties. The Soil Master WR® warranty. Co -polymer of Methacrylates Material, and the values given should and Acrylates/Acetates not be treated as specifications. Seller 48% (with Tripolycate) makes no other warranty, whether ex- 2% Ethoxlylated Surfactants pressed or implied, including warranties 2.6% Skates of merchantability or fitness for a par- 47.4% Inert Ingredients ticular purpose. Buyer accepts liability 4.6 PH Concentrate for determining if the product is suitable Milky White I . Color for Buyer's intended use. Any recom- 9 lbs. Lbs. Per U.S. Gal. mendation as to use made by Seller is done so at Buyer's risk. Non Toxic Toxicity ,Buyer shall assume all risk and liability Non -Flammable Flammability for and shall defend, indemnify, and Slight Odor hold Seller harmless from and against all claims liabilities costs and exp eases SOIL MASTER WR IS NOT AN INSECTICIDE, "FERTILIZER OR PLANT FOOD PRODUCT.-:-, arising from or Connected with the pos- . „•,., ", Auxiliary soil and Plant substance licensed by the State of California. �.. .:-„}_ ,: s . ession, transportation,:handling, unload - References: ing storage, processing or use of the Fifield, J.S. ;. Malnor,. i. K: ;:and Dezman, L E product alone or in combination with "Effectiveness of Erosion Control Products on other substances: Buyer's exclusive rem - Steep Slopes to Control Sediment and to ed. and Seller's exclusive liability for `,Establish Dryland grasses; Proceedings,f a damages under contract, tort, strict t ,` International Erosion Control Assoc�atxon liability negligence or otherwise 'shall Conference XX 1989 z F t y y. 4 4 in no case:exceed so much of the:pur ' r Fifield kJ.S Malnor, L K ; Richter, B and':'. chaseprice as is.appIi tile' 64hatportton , Dezman, L.E., "Field Testing Erosion Control ect of. the particular shipment with. respect 5Products to Control Sediment an to Establish to `:which damages are claimed. In' no: Dryland Grasses UnderArid Conditions; Proceedings. of International Erosion Control , event shall. Seller be liable for. incidental, - Associatron Conference XIX,1988 f \; indirect, or consequential damages - „ , F- : SOI L.' MASTER WR 2 ,r onvironmental" ... 8 s soil systems, ins. 13234 Whistler Avenue, Gninada Hills, CA 91344 . 'Phone: (818) 3684115 / FAX: (818) 368.9393 %Member of the Intematioml Erosion Control Ass«ianon . ..- :. Moo bot of the Sell and 'At. Cwue ,ion Society ( H I Y with the construction of this basin and the irrigation pond on the Fort Collins Park boundary. Sediments will also be controlled by silt fences placed in major drainage swales to slow and collect water borne sediment loads traveling to the detention pond. The construction contract has provisions for an erosion control maintenance contract that will be in effect during the entire construction period. Continuous, periodic maintenance of erosion control measures will be provided. A Silt fence will encircle the irrigation pond, reducing or eliminating the amount of sediments entering the pond that will be used for on -site irrigation demands as soon as it's completed. A silt fence will be installed around the top soil storage pile to filter water borne silts and protect the pile from wind erosion, 1 foot wind berms will also be installed. Gravel inlet filters will be installed at all area inlets and curb inlets as soon as these structures are completed under the utilities contract in late December of 1992. The south student parking lot will be paved with 4" of recycled asphalt base course and will serve as the contractors storage and staging area for the balance of the project. All remaining access roads and parking areas will be sealed with an emulsified soil sealant (See Appendix B) after being brought to grade. Final application of curb and gutter and asphalt surface will be completed in October and November of 1993. .A.temporary diversion ditch will be constructed on the north and east sides of the 'commercial property, Sub - basin B3, to channelize surface flows and direct -them ---_ _. ---- - ' to inlets protected by gravel filter barriers. A temporary diversion ditch will also be installed along the east side of Timberline Road to collect and divert street flow from the crown of the road. This ditch will continue north to the existing roadside ditch at the northwest corner of the project. Off site rainfall flowing onto the site at the northwest corner of the project will be collected by a diversion ditch paralleling the south side:of proposed Vermont Drive approximately 800 feet and daylight east of the three 'foot high berm, as shown on the Erosion Control Plan. Page 2 B. Vegetative Measures Vegetative erosion control measures will consist primarily of the application of hay/straw mulch applied at the rate of 2 tons per acre and crimped to all landscape areas of the project. Mulching will be part of the Demolition and Overlot Grading Contract and will be implemented immediately after the areas are at finished grade. r The east Campus and Soccer fields, sub -basins Al, A2, A3, & A4 will be treated with 4 inches of topsoil disked in plus 4 inches of topsoil to finished grade. These areas will be seeded with Bluegrass Mix A (See Table 1).in May 1993 after installation of the irrigation system under the Landscaping and Irrigation Contract. The remaining landscape areas of West Campus which includes berms, planters and building perimeter will be finished to subgrade and treated with hay/straw mulch and seeded with,0ats as a temporary cover crop. These areas will.receive'topsoil and permanent seed planting in Tall Fescue..seed or sod, Mix C (See Table 1) in July of 1994. All',perennial grass seeding will occur after the installation'bf',,'.the irrigation system under the .Landscaping ..�and:.Irrigation Contract Phase B. III. Seasonal Control and Maintenance Overlot Grading of the site will take place in the fall of 1992. Wind Erosion.will most likely be the major.hazard during this time frame.:, Measures to mitigate windborne .sediments.will be�tlie application of soil.sealants.:and -hay/straw mulch to all areas outside of the physical building envelope. ;,These measures will .be completed--r. ----- �immediately following overlot grading and are included 'in ..Bid Package No. l._,:The time frame for the maximum rainfall erosion hazard occurs in'the spring. The project schedule calls for all erosion control measures to be fully established by late February of 1993. This includes all storm sewer inlet filters, silt fences, sediment basins, soil sealants and vegetative control measures. Maintenance is anticipated to occur after every rainfall event and will likely consist of cleaning and resetting of silt fences, clearing of gravel filter barriers and some spot maintenance of the grass stand or surface sealant on the parking lots. The sediment pond will have to be cleaned in mid -summer of 1993 and 1994 or until a full stand of grass is established in the athletic fields. Page 3 r TABLE 1 Seed Mix A Bluegrass (East Campus, Athletic Fields) Species Freedom Kentucky Bluegrass Nassau Kentucky Bluegrass Ran 1 Kentucky Bluegrass SR 4000 Rye Grass Species oats Species Titan Tall Fescue -Trident 'Taal- Fescue Bonanza Tall Fescue Percent Mixed lb lb PLS Acre of Mix PLS/Acre 130 35 45.5 130 25 32.5 130 20 26.0 130 20 26.0 Total 130.0 Seed Mix B Temporary Cover Crop (West Campus, Landscape Areas) Percent lb PLS/Acre of Mix 70 100 Seed Mix C Fescue -Seed and Sod (Permanent Grass @ West Campus) Percent lb PLS/Acre of Mix 216 33 216 33 216 34 Total Mixed lb PLS/Acre 70 Mixed lb PLS/Acre 71.3 73.4 216.0 APPENDIX A EFFECTIVENESS CALCULATIONS 1---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 PROJECT: FCO S b.6us�, STANDARD FORM B !1 COMPLETED BY: GA DATE: 99/1�—°'q= I Erosion Control C-Factor P-Factor Method Value Value Comment - ------------------ -------------------------------- i1 1z� pant 0, 10 1. 00 0 5eds cnf ��O 1, OO ,50 ov. 0.50 ------------ ------- MAJORI PS SUB BASIN -(_)- BASIN 1 1 1 1 AREA 1 -(Ac)-1 13.7.6 1. vo 1. 00 -rop.l' I 1104; L, ------------------------------------------ CALCULATIONS -------------------------------------------- Ile /Nkl�l Ass C ac- I�Itq�� C- FlCL Y. p��4v. �it=•K1r)��O.l7Z 0. 0 (0 prp p F4ciu� = L(0.5o x�. c2-)11C,.02- fFF = I - (•OCv x .50,)1 c1� 97 .A.q101 4dnr•� irm.� 12,98 Ac- 13. 2 8 A<-• �)0.3OAc— W-�'J L[12.5iU oXO?g.ZB 0.08 13.2 = Q. 51 9G't ok. '. 79.2% K�Lu'rea, -------------- ----- ------ --- --- --- ---- ---- ---------- ----------- ------- IDI/SF-8:1989 J EFFECTIVENESS CALCULATIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- .. (PROJECT: FcNs STANDARD FORM B nn'' ,, 1 COMPLETED BY: GAOJ&i r xl DATE: 9 II Z MAJOR BASIN A Erosion Control C-Factor Method ----------------------------- Value 5; } Ferc e 1, 00 �p�1. Soi I I.OD 72.7 SUB BASIN �I AREA (Ac) I q-5`i I P-Factor Value Comment -------------------------- o.qo -------------------------------------------- CALCULATIONS ------------I-----I----------y-- AKC, in StUc�p; uL y,n'D }'�- �ac}ot - C�-55,X•S�C.go1 : 0.�{s� -C.145x.�15�1x i9,72.1 ----------------- D I /SF-8:1989