Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPINECONE PUD FORT COLLINS HIGH SCHOOL SITE PLAN ADVISORY REVIEW - 60 91B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYT 00 W) 0 00 z a r z a m M jai a Q W x t-- 4 M 10 To: 0 o From: ri m Date: MEMORANDUM Rick Ensdorff, Director of Transportation Matt Delich W��> April 2, 1992 Subject: High school trip data (File: 9203MEM1) As you are aware, extensive traffic counts were taken at the Rocky Mountain High School (RMHS) parking lots and on area streets during the week of February 24, 1992. This data is intended to be used to represent an existing Fort Collins high school's travel patterns in order to predict what might occur at the proposed Fort Collins High School (FCHS). The data collection involved hourly machine counts at numerous locations and observations regarding drop-offs/pick-ups- on Swallow Road in front of RMHS. 'There were 260 drop-off/pick- up vehicles observed during the peak periods. Some of these vehicles had more than one student in them. I also obtained the following information from various school district staff about RMHS: - 1180 students - 90 faculty/staff - 724 parking stalls - 6 buses - 50 students use buses (average) - 250 faculty/staff trips/day - 695 students drive to/from school/day (average) CD z Parking lot driveway counts yielded 4628 vehicles in and out of the parking lots. Inbound vehicles numbered 1574 and W Z_,_ outbound vehicles numbered 3054. Obviously, the number of inbound vehicles should equal the number of outbound- vehicl.es..— W It was observed that students did not necessarily adhere to designated directional traffic flow. Also, two of the accesses to the Southwest Lot have a markedly higher outbound • count compared to the inbound count. Due to the narrow o accesses, it is my judgment that entering vehicles probably a tripped both the inbound and outbound tubes. Therefore, the cc daily count is high and, in particular, the outbound count is N high. cc a If it is assumed that the inbound count is correct • (1574), that would allow each driving student and staff (695 LL + 90 = 785) two inbound trips per day. This would appear to a be reasonable allowing an inbound trip in the morning and an cc inbound trip after lunch. It is reasonable to assume that the outbound vehicles trips should equal the inbound trips. This would result in a total of 3150 vehicle trips into/out, of the parking lots on an average day., To this total, it is necessary to add the number of drop-off/pick-up vehicles and the buses (260 + 24 = 284). This results in a total trip' generation of approximately 3440 for RMHS. If the number of students is used as the trip generation rate variable, then the trip rate/student is 2.915. Trip Generation, 4th Edition indicates a daily rate of 1.385 trips/student. The range of rates is 0.706-2.490! Table 1 shows the trip generation rate comparison between the RMHS data (adjusted) and the ITE data (27 sources). The RMHS rate is more than double the ITE rate. While we both agree that the ITE rate probably does not reflect Fort Collins characteristics, a doubling of the rate will not underestimate the existing and future conditions at Fort Collins high schools. The peak hour data also indicates that the RMHS trip rates are higher than the ITE trip rates.. It is interesting to note that the proportion in and out is almost identical during the peak hours. These rates (daily and peak hour) are for all trips with one trip end at RMHS. They include student trips, staff trips, bus trips, drop-off/pick-up trips, and visitor trips. Once I have your comments on these trip rates, I will continue with my analyses. My preliminary analysis volumes are not significantly different than that which would result using these rates. Actually, some of the peak hour volumes that I used were higher. In my judgment, the access desired by both the high school and the commercial interests can be achieved without sacrificing the operational and safety integrity of Timberline Road as a major arterial. With the commercial area on the corner, there is an opportunity to provide the necessary geometry on the north leg. Based upon traffic projections, it is important -that provision for some double left -turn lanes be made. Other Issues From the FCHS site plan, there are 1050 parking spaces allocated for staff and students. There are 724 parking spaces at RMHS for staff and students. Assuming staff at FCHS will be at the same proportion as at RMHS, the parking/student ratio is 0.614. Applying this ratio to the expected 1800 students at the new FCHS would indicate the need for 1105 parking spaces. It would appear that the plan is about 50 spaces short. This does not bother me so much as the fact that the site plan indicates that there are 250 spaces! allocated to staff. This appears to be high. Given the travel characteristics of the students and the probable number of staff, more spaces should be given to student parking. This would at least allow a similar parking ratio as exists at RMHS. If use of alternative modes by both students and staff occurs and is sustained over a period of time, then perhaps parking lot reductions can be considered. There are currently six buses serving an average of 50 students per day. On -some adverse weather days, ridership does increase. This level of ridership seems low to me. However, the school district is committed to providing transportation to "remote" students. Perhaps the school district, in conjunction with the City can better utilize the Transfort system for some of this service. Based upon my preliminary analyses and the new site plan provided by Cityscape (March 24, 1992), the geometry discussed at our last meeting will work well. While I will refine my analyses, I would recommend that the access shown schematically on the attached graphic be pursued. I realize that there may have been right-of-way decisions made in the pat which will make double left -turn lanes on some legs difficult to accomplish. However, it is important that all parties be aware of the potential need for these. Table 1 Trip Generation Rate Comparison Daily AM (7-9) PM (4-6) Source Trips In Out In Out RMHS Data 2.915 0.364 0.197 0.062 0.094 (trips/students) ITE ( code 530 ) 1.385 0.257 0.139 0.015 - 0.026- (trips/students) i •1 .o IM VBRMcu F1 Z0 + T coo -14 coo rnn •� , I i I M i j -ICS OA (eL Cs)- SrofAGE i _ Decc4.- I&O 04-6MPf?Z80'-340' -t1 T lzo,-/Bo I erg' I I I i I i i Poo f i i IN Soo'+T i Z50tT�j N � R Q z 'o 0 } .o M Ly r p IZo� +T �O M , C, C� av 1 DECc 4. — l(00, 04.5 MPN18o-340� TAP i2o-/80 R +� _a i o • } f- p N T=908 -o H N =1�0-22o� 70CL- 7�d 3io'rT�