HomeMy WebLinkAboutPINECONE PUD THE TOWER SHOPPES SONIC DRIVE IN PRELIMINARY - 60 91N - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSn
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
City of Fort Collins
ALLER-LINGLE ARCHITECTS, P.C. Date: 07/22/2005
DAVID LINGLE
712 WHALERS WAY, SUITE B-100
FORT COLLINS, CO 80525
Staff has reviewed your submittal for PINECONE PUD, THE TOWER SHOPPES, SONIC
DRIVE-IN PDP - TYPE 11, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen
Topic: General
Number: 27 Created: 7/22/2005
[7/22/05] If at all possible, please add a window to the west side of the south elevation.
We've come this far in site orientation, it'd be nice to go all the way.
Number: 21 Created: 7/20/2005
[7/20/05] 1 have made a number of CAD/drawing comments on the plans. Please refer to
them and return the redlines when you resubmit.
Number: 22 Created: 7/20/2005
[7/20/05] Please provide a rendered perspective, elevations and/or material sample boards
so we can evaluate colors and materials used.
Number: 23 Created: 7/20/2005
[7/20/05] 1 need cut sheets for all of the proposed light fixtures. These should include
manufacturer's drawings or photos and info on wattage, LLF's etc.
Number: 5 Created: 7/18/2005
[7118/051 The following departments/agencies have indicated that they have no issues or
concerns with the project: Streets, Comcast, Park Planning, and US Postal Service.
Number.6- Created: 7/18/2005
[7/18/05] Water Conservation and Building Inspection have standard comments and
handouts for you that I will include in your redline packet.
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata
Topic: General
Number: 11 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] In field observations, the existing hydrant towards the southeast comer of the site
appears to be directly in the path of the sidewalk proposed to be extended along the eastern
boundary of the site. Is the drawing accurate with regards to the location of the hydrant in
relation to the sidewalk? What will be the separation distance between the sidewalk and the
hydrant?
Number: 24 Created: 7/20/2005
[7/20/05] Please provide information as to where the emergency access easement (offsite)
will be situated, The response letter indicates that the emergency access easement will
Page 1
occur around the permiter of the site, however the drawings only indicate the portion off of
Horsetooth. Will it connect out to Timberline?
Number: 25 Created: 7/20/2005
[7/20/05] Letter of intent are required from all the affected offsite property owners, this
includes Lot 3 and Lot 1 and involve various easements, (emergency access, landcaping,
construction, drainage, etc.)
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Monica Moore
Topic: General
Number: 1 Created: 7/11/2005
[7/11/05] Normal electric development charges and policies will apply to this development.
Number: 2 Created: 7/11 /2005
[7/11/05] Developer will need to submit a Commercial Service Form (C-1) in order to size
the transformer and determine electric requirements.
Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore
Topic: General
Number: 9 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] No issues.
Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom
Topic: General
Number: 10 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] The two P5 fixtures next to building are buried in Burr Oaks - need to relocate
these two light fixtures.
Number: 12 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] The landscape plan shows a possible P5 fixture near the NE comer of the trash
enclosure. This is an important location for employee access to trash/recycle enclosure.
Would recommend deleting plant materials (DKL, RB) next to this location in favor of lower
growing species (max height24").
Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Harridan
Topic: Grading Plan -- -- _
Number: 26 Created: 7/22/2005
[7/22/05] Please clarify how the swale that runs along the south, then east end of the site
transition into the proposed curb and gutter on the east property line.
Topic: Maintenance
Number: 20 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] Please clarify who will maintain the off -site pond. If it is to be maintained by the
overall developer (WW Reynolds) then a maintenance agreement should be provided
detailing how the pond will be maintained.
Topic: Off -site Easements
Number: 18 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] Please provide copies of off -site construction and drainage easements on Lot 1 of
the Tower Shoppes property. Letters of intent for these easement will be required prior to
this item going to a hearing.
Page 2
Topic: Swale Design
Number: 19 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] Temporary swales carrying drainage water into the pond have a history of siltation
and lack of proper maintenance. How will the Developer guarantee that these will be
properly maintained ? A temporary (until Lot 1 develops) small diameter pipe might be a
good way to ensure that the area where water comes off the site drains properly.
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill
Topic: General
Number: 13 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] With regards to the response to the conceptual review comments, specifically
number 16 ..."After consulting with planning staff, it was agreed that a reduction in sidewalk
width would be allowale as the sidewalk in question is not used as a path to the building". I
do not believe that whether or not a sidewalk leads to a building bears much on reducing the
standard width as specified in 3.2.2 of the LUC. Yes, this walkway would most likely not be
used by patrons of the establshment to reach the building. However, it seems to me that
said walkway would very likely be used by the "carhops"/servers to walk back and forth
while serving patrons of Sonic. If the walk is reduced in width, servers may very well be
forced to constantly walk in the drive aisle(s), behind parked vehicles, all the while in conflict
with arriving/departing vehicles. Unless there is a compelling reason why the walk should
be reduced to 7', it seems that it would help to create a much safer pedestrian (worker)
environment to keep the standard width of 8'.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: General
Number: 14 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] Include the standard general note pertaining to shrub/utility separation distance on
the landscape plans. Maintain the required landscape/utility separation distance on the
landscape plans.
Number: 15 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] Make the text on the overall utility plan sheet pertaining to the abandonment of the
existing water service more legible.
Number: 16 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] Cleanouts are required every 100 feet on the proposed sanitary sewer service. —
Clearly define those cleanouts with in vehicle travel areas as Traffic Rated and include the
standard detail on the detail sheet.
Number: 17 Created: 7/19/2005
[7/19/05] See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez
Topic: Zoning
Number: 3 Created: 7/12/2005
[7/12/05] Signage approved through separate sign permit application submittal thus signs
shown on this PDP not recognized as approval for such.
Page 3
1. .
Number: 4 Created: 7/12/2005
[7/12/05] Landscape notes need to include that no Certificate of Occupancy or Temporary
Cert. of Occupancy can be issued with complete landscape installation or securment by
bond, escrow, or letter of credit in the amount of 125% of value of un-completed landscaping
(materials/labor).
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely,
Anne Aspen
City Planner
Page 4