Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPINECONE PUD THE TOWER SHOPPES SONIC DRIVE IN PRELIMINARY - 60 91N - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSn STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins ALLER-LINGLE ARCHITECTS, P.C. Date: 07/22/2005 DAVID LINGLE 712 WHALERS WAY, SUITE B-100 FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 Staff has reviewed your submittal for PINECONE PUD, THE TOWER SHOPPES, SONIC DRIVE-IN PDP - TYPE 11, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Anne Aspen Topic: General Number: 27 Created: 7/22/2005 [7/22/05] If at all possible, please add a window to the west side of the south elevation. We've come this far in site orientation, it'd be nice to go all the way. Number: 21 Created: 7/20/2005 [7/20/05] 1 have made a number of CAD/drawing comments on the plans. Please refer to them and return the redlines when you resubmit. Number: 22 Created: 7/20/2005 [7/20/05] Please provide a rendered perspective, elevations and/or material sample boards so we can evaluate colors and materials used. Number: 23 Created: 7/20/2005 [7/20/05] 1 need cut sheets for all of the proposed light fixtures. These should include manufacturer's drawings or photos and info on wattage, LLF's etc. Number: 5 Created: 7/18/2005 [7118/051 The following departments/agencies have indicated that they have no issues or concerns with the project: Streets, Comcast, Park Planning, and US Postal Service. Number.6- Created: 7/18/2005 [7/18/05] Water Conservation and Building Inspection have standard comments and handouts for you that I will include in your redline packet. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General Number: 11 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] In field observations, the existing hydrant towards the southeast comer of the site appears to be directly in the path of the sidewalk proposed to be extended along the eastern boundary of the site. Is the drawing accurate with regards to the location of the hydrant in relation to the sidewalk? What will be the separation distance between the sidewalk and the hydrant? Number: 24 Created: 7/20/2005 [7/20/05] Please provide information as to where the emergency access easement (offsite) will be situated, The response letter indicates that the emergency access easement will Page 1 occur around the permiter of the site, however the drawings only indicate the portion off of Horsetooth. Will it connect out to Timberline? Number: 25 Created: 7/20/2005 [7/20/05] Letter of intent are required from all the affected offsite property owners, this includes Lot 3 and Lot 1 and involve various easements, (emergency access, landcaping, construction, drainage, etc.) Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Monica Moore Topic: General Number: 1 Created: 7/11/2005 [7/11/05] Normal electric development charges and policies will apply to this development. Number: 2 Created: 7/11 /2005 [7/11/05] Developer will need to submit a Commercial Service Form (C-1) in order to size the transformer and determine electric requirements. Department: Natural Resources Issue Contact: Doug Moore Topic: General Number: 9 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] No issues. Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Topic: General Number: 10 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] The two P5 fixtures next to building are buried in Burr Oaks - need to relocate these two light fixtures. Number: 12 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] The landscape plan shows a possible P5 fixture near the NE comer of the trash enclosure. This is an important location for employee access to trash/recycle enclosure. Would recommend deleting plant materials (DKL, RB) next to this location in favor of lower growing species (max height24"). Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: Grading Plan -- -- _ Number: 26 Created: 7/22/2005 [7/22/05] Please clarify how the swale that runs along the south, then east end of the site transition into the proposed curb and gutter on the east property line. Topic: Maintenance Number: 20 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] Please clarify who will maintain the off -site pond. If it is to be maintained by the overall developer (WW Reynolds) then a maintenance agreement should be provided detailing how the pond will be maintained. Topic: Off -site Easements Number: 18 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] Please provide copies of off -site construction and drainage easements on Lot 1 of the Tower Shoppes property. Letters of intent for these easement will be required prior to this item going to a hearing. Page 2 Topic: Swale Design Number: 19 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] Temporary swales carrying drainage water into the pond have a history of siltation and lack of proper maintenance. How will the Developer guarantee that these will be properly maintained ? A temporary (until Lot 1 develops) small diameter pipe might be a good way to ensure that the area where water comes off the site drains properly. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: General Number: 13 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] With regards to the response to the conceptual review comments, specifically number 16 ..."After consulting with planning staff, it was agreed that a reduction in sidewalk width would be allowale as the sidewalk in question is not used as a path to the building". I do not believe that whether or not a sidewalk leads to a building bears much on reducing the standard width as specified in 3.2.2 of the LUC. Yes, this walkway would most likely not be used by patrons of the establshment to reach the building. However, it seems to me that said walkway would very likely be used by the "carhops"/servers to walk back and forth while serving patrons of Sonic. If the walk is reduced in width, servers may very well be forced to constantly walk in the drive aisle(s), behind parked vehicles, all the while in conflict with arriving/departing vehicles. Unless there is a compelling reason why the walk should be reduced to 7', it seems that it would help to create a much safer pedestrian (worker) environment to keep the standard width of 8'. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General Number: 14 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] Include the standard general note pertaining to shrub/utility separation distance on the landscape plans. Maintain the required landscape/utility separation distance on the landscape plans. Number: 15 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] Make the text on the overall utility plan sheet pertaining to the abandonment of the existing water service more legible. Number: 16 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] Cleanouts are required every 100 feet on the proposed sanitary sewer service. — Clearly define those cleanouts with in vehicle travel areas as Traffic Rated and include the standard detail on the detail sheet. Number: 17 Created: 7/19/2005 [7/19/05] See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez Topic: Zoning Number: 3 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Signage approved through separate sign permit application submittal thus signs shown on this PDP not recognized as approval for such. Page 3 1. . Number: 4 Created: 7/12/2005 [7/12/05] Landscape notes need to include that no Certificate of Occupancy or Temporary Cert. of Occupancy can be issued with complete landscape installation or securment by bond, escrow, or letter of credit in the amount of 125% of value of un-completed landscaping (materials/labor). Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Anne Aspen City Planner Page 4