Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPINECONE PUD OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 60 91A - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSDevelop -nt Services Planning Department City of Fort Collins March 20, 1992 Mr. Eldon Ward Cityscape Urban Design 3030 South College Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO. 80525 Dear Eldon: Staff has reviewed Pinecone Farm Overall Development Plan and offers the following comments: 1. The primary issue with this O.D.P. is to satisfy transportation and land use goals regarding internal collector street access to Parcel A. neighborhood service center. In lieu of such a collector, the narrative references an "integrated bike and pedestrian system for 'the Pinecone community, including safe, direct, pedestrian and bike access from residential to shopping areas and the high school." This is an extremely important planning objective and should be noted on the plan document as Note #7. It would be a good idea to prioritize the notion that such paths are to be constructed off-street as much as possible. 2. There is one location of a potential path connection to the Webster property. The graphic depiction is not referenced in the legend. This connection should be labeled as a "potential ----,connection" subject to future planning on the Webster parcel. 3. Similarly, there is also a vague reference connecting parcel P, across the drainage channel, t street that will serve the neighborhood park. This is a good idea and should be upgraded and graphically prominent on the plan document. o a - path------- the local connection made more 4. Staff applauds the use of drainage channels as locations for the off-street path system. Both the north channel (serving Parcels D, K, and P) and the south channel (serving Parcels G,H, and N) terminate as dead -ends. Have you or the applicant considered connecting these two termination points to create a loop around Parcels M, L, and K? Such a loop would create a truly integrated system with a circular pattern for both functional alternative transportation and recreational amenity? It is not too far-fetched to envision a future connection to the Poudre River trail (through the Johnson or 231 N. College Avenue • P.O. Box :;SO • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750 C.S.U. property) which is in the area of the C.S.U. Nature Center about 1/4 to 1/2 mile to the northeast. The potential of this network is exciting and would create a tremendous functional and.recreational amenity for Pine Cone Farm. 5. In general, bike/pedestrian paths are a key transportation factor in this O.D.P. and this importance should be duly noted on the document so the variety of builders bidding on the parcels are made aware of the network. Presently, this importance does not come across and is somewhat buried in both the text and plan. Please make this network a more prominent feature of the plan document. 6. Given the proximity to an arterial and the school parking lot, Parcel F is a logical candidate for higher density residential. It is suggested that an alternative land use be designated on Parcel F for duplexes and/or patio homes. 7. Please label the ponds on the east side of the athletic fields. 8. Please delete the reference to "Minor" Road. This name has never been officially accepted by City Council, who, under the Code, has the authority to name arterial streets based on an approved list of distinguished citizens who have been selected to be honored with a street name. "Minor" does not appear on the list. In the eyes of the Planning Department, the road remains, until formal Council action, County Road #9. 9. Please label the existing surrounding streets: Kingsley, Caribou, Arctic Fox, Danfield, Vermont, and Sagebrush. 10 Please label surrounding zoning classifications. 11. Please correct the vicinity map to read "Drake", not "Prospect". 12. In Note 43, it is suggested that the word "vehicle" should be replaced by the word "entity" so that one does not conjure up -------- images of pick-up or flat bed truck. This concludes Staff comments at this time. Please note the following deadlines for the April 27, 1992 Planning and zoning Board hearing: Plan revisions are due April 1, 1992 P.M.T.'s, 10 prints, renderings are due April 20, 1992 Final documents are due April 23, 1992. As always, please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely: Ted Shepard Senior Planner xc: Sherry Albertson -Clark, Chief Planner Kerrie Ashbeck, Civil Engineer