HomeMy WebLinkAboutPINECONE PUD THE TOWER SHOPPES PRELIMINARY - 60 91L - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY00
l`7
0
co
J'
W
x
MEMORANDUM
To:
Libby Glass,
W. W. Reynolds Companies
o
r
Eldon Ward, Cityscape
Fort Collins
Planning Department
o
Fort Collins
Transportation Division
From:
Matt Delich
Date:
June 6, 1994
Subject:
Tower Shoppes
PUD traffic study (File: 9458MEM1)
This memorandum documents the trip generation analysis
conducted for the Tower Shoppes PUD, located in the northeast
quadrant of the Hors etooth/Timberline intersection in Fort
Collins. This site was Parcel A of the Pinecone PUD, which
was considered and approved by the City of Fort Collins in
1992. This memorandum serves as an addendum to the "Pinecone
PUD Site Access Study," April 1992.
The Tower Shoppes PUD is a multi -use retail center that
will likely be anchored by a grocery store. The remainder of
the site will likely have uses that are typical of multi -use
retail centers (fast food restaurants, bank, miscellaneous
retail, etc.). Table 1 shows the expected trip generation
from the individual uses expected at the Tower Shoppes PUD.
Trip Generation, 5th Edition, ITE was used .to estimate the
daily and peak hour trip generation. Based upon research,
documented in Chapter VIII, Multi -Use Developments/Quantifying
Capture Rates, Trip Generation, 5th Edition, the total trip
z generation of the individual uses can be factored to reflect
multi -purpose trips and captured trips. This is reflected in
w---the line labelled "Adjusted Total."
z — --
w Table 2 shows the trip generation estimates for this
parcel from the cited site access study. The land use assumed
for this parcel was a 100,000 square foot shopping center with
• no specific uses indicated. Comparing Tables 1 and 2
o indicates that the trip generation for the specific uses is
a higher than the generalized land use from the site access
cc study.
0
a
z Since some of the differences are significant, the
cc traffic assignment (Figure 6 in the site access study) was
adjusted at key intersections to reflect the trip generation
LL differences. This reassignment is shown in Appendix A.
Analyses were performed on these key intersections using the
new traffic assignments. Table 3 shows the peak hour
operation. All key intersections will operate similarly to
that indicated in the site access study. Calculation forms
are provided in Appendix B.
7.9E5 HCI•I: Si CN1LiiED INTERSEC71014S
SUMMARY REFORT
++++x++•++xrrrrxx••++•xrxxxxxx+rrrrrxrrxxr•x•x.txxxx.rr++++.+x+++•i.++xxxx+•.
INTEP.SECTION..horsetooth %timberline
AREA T.YFE..... OTHEF.
ANALYST....... ,i and h
DATE.......... 616i 94
TIME_ ...... .`aii) am
COMMENT.......
?.955 r.Ci•!: oi.Gla:.LLED TNTEREECTIOiJE
SUMM.:F:V REPORT
++rxxrxrx••r•xrrx+rr•x•••++••r+rx•r•••••••rxr•x+••••••+rxrxxxxx•+x••+»++r
TNTERSECTIOP1.. hor,-tocirrt /timberline
AREA TYPE..... OTHE.^: /
DnTE.......... 6/6�:�'974� `
T3 HE.......... am :./
COMMENT.......
VOLUMES
CEOMETR,
VOLUMES
GEOMETF:Y
Er WB
ND
SE :
EB
WE
NEE
SD
EB WB
HE
SB EB
WE
NE
SB
LT
415 2oi0
25C-
L
i2. i.i
12,'
L 1=..
L
1C'.ii
LT
7.10 1.95
7.40
24C! L 12.0 L
12.0
L 12.0
L
12.0
TH
480 440
77,Cl
.
210 : L
_
12.i1
12.0
_ 12.
L
12.0
TH
290 745
B90
11:160 L 12u T
L.O
L 12.0
L
1;
RT
4i3O -65
205
2BO : T
12. i i T
12, r
- I:!. Ci
T
12. i t
RT
-80 7.10
165
45t, T 12. i• T
12. 0
T 12.0
T
1.
P.F
ii : TR
12..J '.
7.-.ii
T 15.",
T
17. it
FF,
0
0
-, TR 12.0 R
1--.0
T 12.0
T
i_:.
i
12.O
TF 12.G
TR
1=.:.
12.0
12.O
TR 12.0
TF.
12.1.
12. fl
2.v
12. it
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
12.0
12.0
12.171
1Z1.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADJUSTMENT
FACTORS
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE
HV ADJ PY.G BUSES
PHF
PEDS
PED. BUT.
ARR.
TYPE
GRADE
HV
ADJ Pi BUSES PHF
REDS
PED. BUT.
ARR.
TYPE
'Y/N
Nit
Nb
Y/N in T
(%i (i:1
V/N IJm IJb
x/N min T
EB
ii. Of, 2.
i10
N 0
C, I, nr:
20
Y 25.e
-
EE
..00 2.00
1J 0 C, 1.00
20
Y' 25.8
�.
WE
0. 00 2. 00
N 0
0 1 . i10
2C,
Y 25.0
WE
Co. 00 2.
0t,
N 0 0 1 . � ii �
20
Y 25. 8
NE
O. Cot, �. C":)
N O
O 1. CP 1
20
Y 25.6
3
NE
Co. Cot) 2.
ili i
N Co 0 1 . 00
20
Y 25.8
=.
SE
0. 00 _. 00
N 1-1
O 1 . cot-,
20
'Y 25. 5
-
SE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0. 0' i 2.
01 ,
N o 0 1 .00
20
Y 25.8
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNAL SETTINGS
CYCLE LENGTH =
120.0
SIGNAL SETTINGE
CYCLE LENGTH
=
120.0
PH-1
FH-2
F'H--
PH-4
PH-1
F'H-2 PH--
PH-4
PH-1
PH-2
PH-- PH-4
PH-1
PH-2 PH-7
PH-4
EB
LT X
x
x
NE
LT
X
X
EB
LT x
X
?: NE
LT
X X
X
TH
I
X
TH
X
TH
X:
X
TH
x
x
RT
X
X
RT
x
RT
r
X
RT
x
x
F'D
X
x
PD
x
PD
x
is
F'D
x
X
WE
LT x
x
SB
LT
x x
x
WE
LT x
.. SB
LT
x
:X
TH
x
TH
x
x
TH
..
TH
x
RT
X
FT
..
x
RT
A
PT
x
PD
..
FIE,
X
x
PD
X
PD
GREEN
-. Co
-6. O
0. O GREEN 11
. C. -. to 41
. O
to. v
GREEN
5. 0
4. O
-6. 0 0. 0 GREEN 10.
0 '. 0 42.0
YELLOW
0. 0
4.0
6. i i
Co. 0 YELLOW
i.:�.�.�. 4. C,
6. 0
i �, Cli
ELLOW
---------_--`-----------------------'_-_-----------------------------'
Co. CI
4.0
6.--) C', 0 YELLOW :i,
i t A. 6
6. 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVEL OF SSERVICE
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE CRF'.
V/C
G/C
DELAY
LOG
APP. DELAY
AF'F'.
LOS
-
LANE GP.F'.
V/C
6 C DELAY
LOS
APF. DELAY
APP.
LOS
ED
L
0. 7.4B
0.47,?
17.5
C
2i.4
C
ED
_
0.717
i),4 3 17.2
C
18.2
C
TF.
0. 729
0.7.87
21.7
C
TR
0.554
0.-F2 18.7
C
WE.
L
:.7-2'
C'. 35.
55.9
E
28.6
D
WE
L
0.754
0. 342 25.
D
24.0
C
-
V.-49
0. .25
20.4
C
T
0.675
v-__25 6
C
R
6. 544
i1_7.25
22.-
C
R
0.67.7
0.7.25 9
C
NE
L
0. 681
6.4-3
26.4
D
21.0
C
NE
L
0.679
ii:517 18.0
C
16.6
C
TF,
f1. 544
0.-,67
19.c.
C
TF:
0. St4
i�. 4--. 16. C'
C
SE
L
ii
_.294
0.517
12.7
1
16.0
C.
BP
L.
1 -, 641
Il. 4J 25. 1
D
25. -
L'
TR
1:. 55c
11,425
16.;t
C
I
TR
�1_b7!1
_
V._%5 25.7.
D
3NTERSECTTON:
Delay = 20.7 leer_/veh)
V%C =
6.641 LOS
= C
INTEF:SECTION:
Delay
= 21.4 (sec/vehi
V/C =
D.706 LOS
= C
19E5 HCMz UNSI5NALIZED iIdTERSECTIOIdS Fage-1
r•xxxxxrr•+xxrr r:+x++•xwrx xxxxrx:wx++rxxxx+x+xwwx»+x•r+w+•+wx•++xx•w
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. IFIAJOR STREET.. 40
PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... I
AREA POPULATION ...................... Iiri!Otii,
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... access 6
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... norsetootrI
NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. +md
DATE OF THE. ANALYSIS (mm/ddivv)...... 61c/"4
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.................(a Pm
OTHER, INFORMATION....
INTERSECTION TYFE AND CONTROL
INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Eh Wb NE! SE
---- ---- ---- ----
LEFT O --
1-1
THRU
FIGHT 40
CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Fa4e-=
---------------------------------------------------------------------
POTEid----TUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcah) c (pcph) c (pcoh) c 1pcph:r c = c - v LOS
p P! SH R SH
MINOR STREET
SE c
EIGHT 99 757 757 757 65e A
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access e
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... horsetooth
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/6/94 ; pm
OTHER INFORMATION....
19S5 HCM: IjNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Fane-1
riirrai.•riaii.aiiii•rsiiaiciii•ia.r•ii•••i.i.+rarri•arr••r.iar•iar.iii•
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
AVERAGE RUNNING SFEED. MAJOR STREET..
4i,
PEAk:
HOUR FACTOR .....................
I
AREA
POPULATION ......................
lOni ii �ii
NAME
OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.........
access 6
NAME
OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.......
norsetootr,
NAME
OF THE ANALYST ..................
.ime
DATE
OF THE ANALYSIS immidd/vy).......
6/e/94
TIME
PERIOD ANALYZED .................
am Vim`
OTHER
INFORMATION....
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EE WE, NR SE
---- ---- ---- ----
LEFT O --
11
THRU ii 69F --
RIGHT O 45 -- SS
CAPACITY AND LtVE:--OF-SEF:VICE FaAe--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
F'OTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TI AL. MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT vrRCPh) c lCcohl _ �. cPh) C kocph:� C = C LDS
P. fM SH R SH
MINOR STREET
GE _
RIGHT `l4 661 661 661 56D A
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access_ 6
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... horsetooth
LATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/6/94 : am
OTHER INFORMATION....
1985 HCM: UNSIG14ALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pane-i
r*+<.fxs♦resit♦ra.+itr+r+f.�a�.r+a+a♦s-------f-----*---------------- *--------
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
_____________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40
F'EAY: HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1
AREA POPULATION ...................... li�OCgiO
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... acces 7
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... horsetooth
NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. .imd
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS imm/dd/yyi...... 6/6194
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. ................. �:.S pm
OTHER INFORMATION....
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
--------------------------------------- ______________________________
INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
_____________________________________________________________________
EB WB NB SS
---- ---- ---- ----
LEFT 260 Jr. 65 40
THRU 417 7.96 ,., 10
RIGHT. 7C. 35 13,>
NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE
----------------------- ______________________________________________
EB WB Iv= SB
_______ _______ _______
LANES,
LANNE USAGE LT 9 LT
CAPACITY AND
_____________________________________________________________________
LEVEL -OF -SERVICE
pafle_.
FOTEN-
ACTUAL
FLOW-
TIAL
MOVEMENT
SHARED
RESERVE
RATE
CAPACITY
CAPACITY
CAPACITY
CAPACITY
MOVEMENT
vi_ecFhi
c: ipcphi
c 1pcphi
ipcPV0
rSH
c = c - v
LOS
_______
o
________
M
_____________________
R SH
____________
---
MINOR STREET
NB LEFT
72
96
52 >
62 52
-48 -2C'
iF F
THROUGH
7.9
151
95
95
57
> E
RIGHT
22
793
793
793
77i
A
MINOR STREET
5B LEFT
44
113
57
62 �7
713
>E E
THROUGH
11
152
96
96
85
_
RIGHT
143
GOO
5300
60C,
657
A
MAJOR STREET
EP LEFT
256
6a6
646
646
360
B
WE LEFT
11
634
634
63:4
627.
A
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access 7
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... horsetooth
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSI5..... 6/6/94 ;(a(ye -m
OTHER: INFORMATION....
1905 HCN: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
tiitiiitttixittttxxxi••ttt••iixtxtt•i•ixtxt••x•xtxt.•••ttxii••t•x•..•
I➢ENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RU14NING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 40
PEAi:: HOUR FACTOR ...................... 1
AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STR.EET......... access 7
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... nor=_etooth
NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. jmd
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mmidd/yyi...... 6/6/94
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED _................. am I-pj
OTHER: INFORMATION....
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND; STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB WB NB SE
---- ---- ---- ----
LEFT 55 30 45 50
THRU 327 663 10 1 ,
RIGHT 95 _, 10 60
NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB WB NE SR
------- ------- ------- -------
LANES _ _ _ -
LANE USAGE LT - F. L7 - F
CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE FaBe--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOI11- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT vtPcphi c (ncph) c (Pcph) c (pcph? c = c - v LOS
p 11 SH F. SH
------------------------------------------------ ---
MINOR STREET
NB LEFT 50 Ili 89 95 89 34 39 it E
THROUGH 11 157 136 > 17.6 :> 125 > D
RIGHT 11 B04 004 604 793 A
MINOR STREET
SE LEFT 55 112 95 > 99 95 :> _7. 40 iE E
THROUGH li 142 126 126 115 D
RIGHT 66 695 695 695 629 A
MAJOR STREET
EB LEFT 61 403 403 463 422 A
WB LEFT 652 652 652 bill A
I➢ENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access 7
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... horsetooth
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/6/94 ; am ,.pm
OTHER INFORMATION....
It is recommended that northbound right -turn and
southbound left -turn auxiliary lanes be built on Timberline
Road accessing the Tower Shoppes parcel. Due to physical
constraints, the northbound right -turn lane should be 120 feet
plus 90 feet of taper. The southbound left -turn lane on
Timberline Road should be 300 feet long with 90 feet of taper.
It is concluded that the Tower Shoppes PUD is in general
conformance with the overall intent of the "Pinecone PUD Site
Access Study." With the higher trip generation, all key
intersections will operate similarly to that indicated in the
site access study.
Land Use
TOWER SHOPPES
Grocery - 73.1 KSF
Misc. Retail - 20.9KSF
Fast Food - 2.5 KSF
Fast Food - 2.5 KSF
Bank - 5.5 KSF
Total
Adjusted Total
Table 1
Trip Generation
Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak
Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips
in out in out
9170
103
44
385
232
850
64
70
59
44
1580
71
66
47
44
1580
'71
68
47
44
1120
26
18
79
89
14300
335
268
617
453
13160
241
193
469
344
Table 2
Trip Generation
From Pinecone Site Access Study
Daily
A.M.
Peak
P.M.
Peak
Land Use Trips
Trips
Trips
Trips
-Trips
in
out
in
out
Parcel A - 100,000 KSF 7430
122
53
305
318
Table 9
Long Range Peak Hour Operation
Level of
Service
Intersection
AM
PM
Intersection #4
WB RT
A
A
SB LT
B
C
Intersection #5 (signal)
C
C
Horsetooth/Timberline
Intersection #6
SB RT
A
A
Intersection #7
NB LT/T
F (D/E)
E (D)
NB RT
A
A
SB LT/T
E (D)
E (D)
SB RT
A
A
EB LT
B
A
WB LT
A
A
(") Level of service considering vehicle delay, based upon recent
research.
APPENDIX A
LLt
t r
P, 24
�
(o S131 0
N
4401
4c Ic s C TO-OT
4 ?0/,z '? o
4-001.3 BO
40
-07
1d) Q)
0/110
APPENDIX B
I cES HC!•i: Uj,!S i.GNA_ I ZED Ii•!TE^EE="I DIN=. F�ae-I
..+rr------a---•--a--------------•--------------*-----------
IDEHTIF', INC3 INFORMAT IOPI
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SFEED, lli,JDF: STREET..
F'EAl: HOUR: FACTOR .....................
AREA FOFULAT 101,1 ...................... Ini it
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST 'STREET.........
NAME OF THE NnF.TH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline
NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. .imd
E•ATE OF THE ANALYSIS imm/ddivy)...... 6i6/G?
TIME PEF:IOD ANALYZED .................: 89Q. Pa:
OTHER. INFORMi,71ON....
INTERSECTION TYFE AND CONTROL
---------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH. -SOUTH
CONTROL. TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIO
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EB WE NB- SB
---- ---- ---- ----
LE=T i' -- I()r p
THRU -- 524 55c
RIGHT 7, -- ,i
NUMBER: OF LANES
EB WE, Pl+
------- -------------- -----
LANE' _ -- - -
CAF'ACIT',' Ani6 LEVEL-OF-EEF:VA_E F'ene
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PnTEPi- ACTUAL
FLOW- TI. AL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
FATE CAFACITI' CAF'ACIT'i CAP.:CITx CAPACITY
MOVEMEItiT y(PC Ph) c. ,: Pcpn) c iP-pn) c ipcnh) c c - v LDS
P ri SH
MINOR. STREET -
FF
RIGH 77 675 675 675 599 A
MANOR STREET
NEB LEFT Ilia 492 492 A92
IDENTIFYINe INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access 4
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline
�
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/61-4 ; . cm
OTHER INFOF�MATION....
1SS5 HCM: UNSIGiJALi ZED INTERSECTIONS.
x••••.x••x•••x...r++••s�.•••x------•x••••+ra•.-------
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED.
MAJOF. STREET..
45
PEAK
HOUR FACTOF:.....................
1
AREA
POPULATION .....................
NAME
OF THE EAST%NEST
STREET.........
access_ 4
NAME
OF THE NORTH/SOUTH
STREET.......
timberline
NAME
OF THE ANALYST ..................
amd
DATE
OF THE ANALYSIS
mm/dd,yyi......
6/6i P4
TIME
PERIOD ANALYZED .................
am
OTHER INFORMATION....
INTERSECTION TYPE AND
CONTROL
INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION
MAJOR. STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH
CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
___________________________________
EP 4!E NB SE
---- ---- ---- ----
LEFT P __ 126 0
THRU -- 556 ?0.
RI6HT 80 -- 0 110
NUMEER
LANES
L'AP'i;CIT`;' AND LEVEL-OF-SEF:VICE
F ape--
FF'OTEN-
AC':"UAL
FLOW- TIAL
MOVEMENT
SHAPIED
RESERVE
"RATE CAPAC 1TY
CAPACITY
CAP AC ITV
CAFF'ACIT'i
MOVEMENT vipcphi c (Pcoh]
c rpconi
f_ rpcehi
c
SH
R SH
MIiJOR STREET
F_
RIGHT 8E 605 605 605 517
MAJOR STREET
NB LEFT 132 384 64 7.4 25- C
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access 4
NAME OF THE NORTHi SOUTH STREET.... timberline m
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6i6/94 am C J
OTHER INFORMATION.... J