HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTROBEL ANNEXATION AND ZONING - 62 91 A - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
January 27,1992
Gerry Horak, Council Liaison
Tom Peterson, Staff Support Liaison
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board began at 6:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of City Hall West, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Board members
present included Chairman Bernie Strom, Lloyd Walker, Jim Klataske, Joe Carroll, Laurie
O'Dell, Jan Cottier, and Rene Clements -Cooney.
Staff members present included Planning Director Tom Peterson, Sherry Albertson -Clark, Ken
Waido, Ted Shepard, Kirsten Whetstone, Deputy City Attorney Paul Eckman, Mike Herzig,
Kerrie Ashbeck, Patti Schneeberger, and Georgiana Taylor.
Chairman Strom started the meeting with a presentation to two former P & Z Board Members.
The plaques which were presented to these former members represented the service that those
past members gave to the City of Fort Collins and to the Planning and Zoning Board. Margaret
Gorman served on the P & Z Board from August 1990 to July 1991. David Edwards served
on the Board from August of 1985 to February of 1989 and is now a member of the City
Council.
Mr. Peterson presented the Consent Agenda which included: Item 1 - Clarendon Hills
Subdivision - Overall Development Plan, #35-86K; Item 2 - Clarendon Hills Subdivision,
6th Filing - Preliminary & Final, #35-86L; Item 3 - Kingston Woods PUD - Preliminary,
#58-91; Item 4 - CONTINUED (02/24/92) - Housing Authority Maintenance Facility PUD,
#28-89A; Item 5 - CONTINUED (02/24/92) - Mourning Subdivision, 2nd Replat, Lot 1 &
2 - Final, #13-91A; Item 6 - The English Ranch Subdivision, 1st Filing - Final, #75-86F;
Item 7 - South Glen Subdivision, 1st Filing - Replat, #110-79I; Item 8 - Spradley-Barr -
Enlargement of a Building Containing a Non Conforming Use, #63-91; Item 9 - Resolution
PZ92-1 - Vacation of Utility Easement; Item 10 - Resolution PZ92-2 - Endorsing and
Accepting the Framework for Environmental Action; Item 11- K-2 Annexation and Zoning,
#51-91A; Item 12 - Pinecone P.U.D. Rezoning, #60-91; Item 13 - Barnes Annexation and
Zoning, #53-91A; Item 14 Strobel Annexation and Zoning, #62-91A; and Item 15 - which
was pulled for discussion by Member Cottier, Ute Farm Special Review - County Referral,
#1-92.
Mr. Peterson presented the Discussion Agenda which included: Item 16 - Pickett Second
Annexation and Zoning, #56-91, A; Item 17 - Pickett Third Annexation and Zoning, #56-
91B,C; Item 18 - Taco Bell Restaurant PUD - Final, #50-90A; Item 19 - CONTINUED
(02/24/92) - Laurie Subdivision, PUD, 2nd Filing - Final, #44-89E; and Item 20 -
Woodridge PUD - Preliminary, #55-87E.
rA
P & Z MINUTES
January 27, 1992
Chairman Strom asked if there were any Consent items that the Staff or Board wished to pull
for discussion. Member Cottier pulled Item 15 - Ute Farm Special Review - County Referral,
#1-92.
Chairman Strom asked if there were any Consent items for which the audience wished to pull
for discussion. There were no items pulled for discussion. Chairman Strom stated that two
motions were to be taken due to a conflict -of -interest between Member Klataske and the
Pinecone P.U.D. Rezoning.
Member Klataske moved to approve Consent Agenda items 1-3, 6-11, 13 and 14.
Member Cottier seconded the motion.
The motion to approve carried 7-0.
Member Carroll moved to approve Consent Agenda Item 12.
Member O'Dell seconded the motion.
The motion to approve carried 6-0. Member Klataske did not participate in approving
Item 12.
UTE FARM SPECIAL REVIEW - COUNTY REFERRAL. #1-92
Chairman Strom asked Member Cottier if there was a specific point in which she wanted to
address or if the topic needed to be open for general discussion.
Member Cottier felt that a general discussion was not necessary and that her concern was the
approval of accessory recreational uses to a golf course. In the event that the golf course were
to never be established, Member Cottier suggested that a condition be attached to abandon the
accessory uses of the project. Member Cottier also was concerned that something other than a
50 acre golf course would be approved for that parcel.
2