Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTONERIDGE PUD, FOURTH FILING, PHASE II FINAL - 21 92K - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS,; Commu. f Planning and Environmental vices Current Planning City of Fort Collins April 11, 1996 Mrs. Cathy Mathis Vaught -Frye Architects 1113 Stoney Hill Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Cathy: Staff has reviewed the request for Stone Ridge 4th Filing, Phase Two, Final P.U.D., and offers the following comments: The following comment apply to the plat: A. The boundary does not close and the legal description does not match the map. B. There are two Tract D's but no Tract C. Also, the Private Drive should be identified and called out as a separate tract. C. A distance is missing on the line between Lots 61 and 62. D. TCI of Fort Collins (formerly Columbine CableVision) would like to have the open space behind Lots 55-64 designated on the plat as Utility Easements. E. Any previous temporary drainage easements that are vacated by this plat should be so noted and new easements platted as necessary. 2. On the Landscape Plan, please add a note that trees shall be kept at least 10 feet away and shrubs shall be kept four feet away from water and sewer mains. Also, trees shall be kept a minimum of four feet from any gas line. 3. The Public Service Company is concerned that along the private drive, the distance between the back of the curbs is only 31 feet. This causes the back of curb to rear line of the front lot utility easement to be only 10 feet and six inches. PSCo requires a distance of at least 13 feet. If there are utility coordination issues, please contact Gary Huett at Public Service Company. 4. The Landscape Plan should include the total area (in square feet) for each landscape category. Landscape categories are distinguished by their water requirements and 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 FAX (970) 221-6378 • TDD (970) 224-6002 i intended maintenance level. Examples of possible categories include, but are not limited to, high water turfgrass, low water turfgrass, low water planting beds, moderate water planting beds, and non -plant areas. 5. A water main connects the cul-de-sac to County Road #9 between Lots 26 and 27. This would be an ideal location for a bicycle/pedestrian path out to C.R. #9. Please consider adding a five foot wide walk in this location. 6. Please indicate in the Land Use Breakdown the typical front, side, and rear setbacks. 7. The Site Plan indicates 15 foot front yard setbacks. Is this measured from the front' building line or the garage? If this is the garage setback, then cars will overhang the driveway and encroach into the private drive through lane. Please clarify. 8. Additional comments from Engineering and Stormwater will be forthcoming under separate cover. This concludes Staff comments at this time. In order to stay on schedule for the May 20, 1996 Planning and Zoning Board hearing, please note the following deadlines: Plan revisions due May 1, 1996. P.M.T.'s, 10 prints, colored renderings, due May 13, 1996. As always, please call if there are any questions or concerns about these comments, or to set up a meeting to discuss these comments in depth. Sincerely: Ted Shepard Senior Planner