The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSTONERIDGE PUD, FOURTH FILING FINAL - 21 92I - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSITEM NO. 3 MEETING DATE 6127194 STAFF Kirster Whatgton PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Stone Ridge P.U.D., Fourth Filing, Final, 21-92I APPLICANT: Kaplan Companies c/o Vaught -Frye Architects 1113 Stoney Hill Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 OWNER: Kaplan Companies 1060 Sailors Reef Fort Collins, CO 80525 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for a Final P.U.D. for 20 single family lots and 7 duplex lots (14 units) for a total of 34 residential dwelling units on 13.07 acres. The site is located at the northwest corner of Horsetooth Road and County Road #9. The zoning is R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with condition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The request for a final P.U.D. for the Fourth Filing is in conformance with the approved Overall Development Plan and approved preliminary plans. The final P.U.D. satisfies the All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S. The mix of residential uses is compatible with the surrounding area. The project conforms with transportation policies. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Stone Ridge PUD, June 27, 1994 P Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background Fourth Filing, Final #21-92I & Z Meeting The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: T; Agriculture (C.S.U. Agronomy Farm) S: R-L-P; Vacant (English Ranch Subdivision) E: FA-1; Vacant W: R-L-P; Single Family (Stone Ridge Third Filing) Stone Ridge P.U.D. was originally part of the Webster Farm which was annexed and zoned into the City in July of 1992. The following actions have been approved thus far: Stone Ridge O.D.P. July - 1992 Stone Ridge Filing One July - 1992 Stone Ridge Amended O.D.P. April - 1993 Stone Ridge Filing Two April - 1993 Stone Ridge Filing Three April - 1994 Stone Ridge Filing Four Prelim May - 1994 2. Land Use The Final PUD consists of Parcel D and a portion of Parcel E. The Preliminary PUD indicated that Parcel D is designated as Block One and contain 20 single family lots. Parcel E contains 32 lots for 64 duplex units. The final PUD is for 20 single family lots and 14 of the duplex units, with the remainder to be submitted as a separate filing at a later date. Therefore, the final PUD is in substantial conformance with approved preliminary PUD. There were no conditions of preliminary approval. 3. Neighborhood Compatibility Stone Ridge Fourth Filing is a mixed residential project. It is surrounded by three single family projects, Stone Ridge Third, Dakota Ridge Second, and English Ranch Fourth. Because the proposed and surrounding land uses are of similar residential character, Stone Ridge Fourth is considered compatible and no neighborhood information meeting was held. 4. Design A. Greenbelt Network Like the previous three filings, the primary design objective is to create a greenbelt network available to each lot and duplex unit. Along Horsetooth Road and County Road #9, this greenbelt takes on the role of arterial streetscaping. Stone Ridge PUD, Fourth Filing, Final #21-92I June 27, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 3 B. Path A north -south bicycle/pedestrian path will link Block One to Block Two in the area of the easterly cul-de-sac. This path will continue to link up with the arterial sidewalk on Horsetooth Road. From the path to the intersection with County Road #9, the arterial sidewalk will be widened from five to seven feet in width to accommodate bicycle commuters to Hewlett-Packard or future N.C.R. 5. Solar Orientation Of the 20 single family lots, 16 exceed 15,000 square feet and, therefore, are exempt from the solar orientation calculation. All 7 duplex lots are subject to the analysis. Therefore, a total of 11 lots form the basis of the calculation. Of the four eligible single family lots, two are within solar orientation compliance. of the 7 duplex lots, 7 are within solar compliance. The sum of 9 lots equals 82% of the total qualifying lots. This exceeds the required minimum of 65%. 6. Transportation The Final PUD conforms to the overall street network planned for these parcels since adoption of the amended Overall Development Plan in April of 1993. There are no direct access points from lots to the adjacent arterials. Blocks One and Two are served by local streets internal to the project. The project complies with transportation policies. RECOMMENDATION: In evaluating the request for a Final PUD for Stone Ridge Fourth Filing, Staff finds the following facts to be true: A. The PUD is in conformance with the approved Overall Development Plan. B. The request satisfies the All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S. C. The land use is compatible with the surrounding area. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of Stone Ridge Final PUD, Fourth Filing, 21-92I with the following condition related to signing and execution of the development agreement and approval of all final utility plans: Stone Ridge PUD, Fourth Filing, Final W21-92I June 27, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 4 1. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit development final plan upon the condition that the development agreement, final utility plans, and final P.U.D. plans for the planned unit development be negotiated between the developer and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the second monthly meeting (August 22, 1994) of the Planning and Zoning Board following the meeting at which this planned unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it shall first find that there exists with respect to said planned unit development final plan certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which require the granting of the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner or developer of such property and provided that such extension can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to be included in the development agreement, the developer may present such dispute to the Board for resolution if such presentation is made at the next succeeding or second succeeding monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table any such decision, until both the staff and the developer have had reasonable time to present sufficient information to the Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects to table the decision, it shall also extend the term of this condition until the date such decision is made). If this condition is not met within the time established herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final approval of this planned unit development shall become null and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date that the condition is met, for purposes of determining the vesting of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II, Division 3, of the City Code, the 11final decision" of the Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of this conditional approval; however, in the event that the dispute is presented to the Board for resolution regarding provisions to be included in the development agreement, the running of time for the filing of an appeal of such 'final decision" shall be counted from the date of the Board's decision resolving such dispute. ITEM: STONERIDGE PUD, 4th Fig North NUMBER: 2 I -92I VICNTY YAP J 7 45 46,,;\ \C! gill �l• (. i 4 PLAMMING AND O 47 I I ♦awe '�/ �''<� sr+.` i i� \\,\\`.\ �..�, •,� 1 IOAIO APPII�YKING 1 49 STO RIDGE P.0 \��'�" i iz'l.`.`'•.Y',' 20 52 56 57 58 18 \ i , - W'---j 23 22 1 /—' C.:�-y O il 17 24 21 / J 1 2s PO 26 19 17 18 I 18 27 28 FLIT E 15 1 29 30(N A PAR F S ` BMI 17 14 16 0 1wAoi A • 32 Q IX '5 9 73 I' U Z 2 M 1 12 1 ..-- - ...W...-..._..��- / _gip._ �._.._.... zs:.e M •_ STONE RIDGE P.U.D. FOURTH FILING FORT COLLINS COLORADO SCHOOL PROJECTIONS PROPOSAL: STONERIDGE PUD, 4th Filing - Final DESCRIPTION: 34 single family units on 18.70 DENSITY: General Population 34 (units) x 3.5 1.818 du/acre (persons/unit) = 119 SchoolAge Population Elementary - 34 (units) x .450 Junior High - 34 (units) x .210 Senior High - 34 (units) x .185 Affected Schools Shepardson Elementary Boltz Junior High (pupils/unit) = 15.3 (pupils/unit) = 7.14 (pupils/unit) = 6.29 Design Capacity Enrollment 546 501 900 1015 Fort Collins Senior High 1300 1418 �5AOA),Feik)66 �� f��/J-Fi�3�4L Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY CRITERION Is the criterion applicable? Will the criterion be satisfied? If no, please explain r A s a a i Yes No Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA 1.1 Solar Orientation 1.2 Comprehensive Plan 1.3 Wildlife Habitat ✓ 1.4 Mineral Deposit 1.5 Ecologically Sensitive Areas reserved reserved 1.6 Lands of Agricultural Importance 1.7 Energy Conservation ✓ 1.8 Air Qualit ✓ 1.9 Water Quality 1.10 Sewage and Wastes A2. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA 2.1 Vehicular, Pedestrian, Bike Transportation ✓ �/ 2.2 Building Placement and Orientation ✓ �/ 2.3 Natural Features ✓ �/ 2.4 Vehicular Circulation and Parkin 2.5 Emergency Access ✓ ✓ 2.6 Pedestrian Circulation ✓ ✓ 2.7 Architecture ✓ V 2.8 Building Height and Views 2.9 Shadin ✓ 2.10 Solar Access ✓ ✓ 2.11 Historic Resources 2.12 Setbacks ✓ 2.13 Landscape ✓ ✓ 2.14 Signs ✓ ✓ 2.15 Site Lighting ✓ 2.16 Noise and Vibration 2.17 Glare or Heat ✓ 2.18 Hazardous Materials ✓ A3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA 3.1 Utility Capacity ✓ 3.2 Design Standards 3.3 Water Hazards ±V17- ✓ 3.4 Geologic Hazards