Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMAVERIK AT I 25 AND HIGHWAY 392 - PDP200001 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview January 24, 2020 Cassie Younger Maverik 185 State Street Salt Lake City, UT 8411 RE: Maverik, PDP200001, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of Maverik. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator, Brandy Bethurem Harras via phone at 970-416-2744 or via email at bbethuremharras@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Development Review Coordinator Contact: Brandy Bethurem Harras, 970-416-2744, bbethuremharras@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/21/2020: INFORMATION: I am your primary point of contact throughout the development review and permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist you and your team. Please include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you! DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 2 01/21/2020: INFORMATION: As part of your submittal you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Provide reference to specific project plans or explanations of why comments have not 2 been addressed, when applicable. DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 3 01/21/2020: INFORMATION: All resubmittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being the cut-off for routing the same week. When you are ready to resubmit please let me know. DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 4 01/21/2020: INFORMATION: Please ensure you are following the updated submittal requirements and naming standards. https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic-submittal-requiremen ts-and-file-naming-standards_v1_8-1-19.pdf?1566851519 DCI Response: Noted Department: Planning Services Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/16/2020: BY HEARING: SITE PLAN COVER PAGE - - Please use standard CDNS signature block template. DCI Response: Revised signature block. - Please check site plan notes with City standard note template for applicable notes for this project. DCI Response: Site plan notes have been taken from the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS)/City of Fort Collins. - Please add additional information regarding the parking calculations. Based on email communications between the City of Fort Collins and Maverik in May of 2019, the allowable parking calculation was derived based on a split General Retail/Restaurant Fast Food use, with the restaurant occupying 1,000SF. The resulting calculations require a minimum of 7 spaces for the restaurant and a minimum of 10 for the retail. The maximum allowed is 15 for the restaurant and 20 for the retail. Comment Number: 2 01/16/2020: BY HEARING: SITE PLAN- - Please expand site plan map to show frontage road and curb/gutter, parkway and sidewalk along frontage, and I-25 off-ramp boundary. DCI Response: Noted - align connecting sidewalk at edge of parking to be more direct - see redline. DCI Response: The water quality calculations necessitated a less direct, yet still ADA compliant pathway to the future sidewalk in the Right of Way. - Remove all detail call-outs on this page and put them in Utility plan set. Label all site plan elements. DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 3 01/16/2020: BY HEARING: LANDSCAPE PLAN- - See site plan comment on showing frontage road improvements including parkway streetscape planting strip between curb and detached sidewalk along 3 entire frontage. The new detached sidewalk along frontage road and Carpenter Road/off-ramp corner, including landscaping in parkway. RMS Response: Refer to variance request from DCI Engineers for street section. Trees have been shown at 40’ oc. . DCI Response: Please refer to the variance request letter for a request for modification to the requested standard. The current Right of Way is Caltrans maintained and contains an existing drainage swale that conveys CDOT flows from I-25. The addition of a detached sidewalk and planting strip would necessitate filling of the CDOT swale and replacement with underground conveyance piping - Add tree island at front parking bay area - see redline. DCI Response: Maverik, Inc. standards call for a flush curb along the frontage of all convenience stores. The standard was derived out of concerns for safety of patrons that were tripping over vertical curb. The standard calls for parking stalls flush with the store sidewalk with vehicular bollards to provide protection from vehicle contact. In lieu of a tree island, Maverik proposes the installation of a tree grate within the sidewalk to provide parking lot shading and provide the visual appearance of breaking up large areas of parking. - Add perimeter tree planting as shown. - RMS Response: Trees added to perimeter. - Check landscape notes with template for applicable standard notes on page 3. RMS Response: All notes are current with COFC notes, some have been deleted that are not applicable and additional notes, such as PFA tree limbing heights, added. Comment Number: 4 01/16/2020: BY HEARING: TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSURES- - Per Section 3.2.5, show all trash and recycling containers inside enclosure, capacity, % recycling vs. trash etc. DCI Response: Trash enclosure shown on Page 10 of the Civil Utility Plans - Provide easy and separate pedestrian walk-in access to enclosure (person door). DCI Response: A dedicated striped pathway was added to connect the trash enclosure to the Convenience Store. The pathway is ADA compliant with respect to grades and slopes. Comment Number: 5 01/16/2020: INFORMATION ONLY: CONTINUATION OF CONCEPTUAL COMMENTS. - signs shown on building and canopies will not be approved with this PDP, but will be reviewed separately in conformance with sign requirements. - All free standing signs on site shall be ground monument signs limited to 14' maximum in height per LUC Section 3.9.12 (D). DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 6 01/21/2020: BY HEARING: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR I-25 CORRIDOR - Section 3.9.3 - Building setback form I-25 Centerline. Please show setback distance from the new I-25 centerline to building location. 4 - Section 3.9.4 (B) Landscape Buffer. Please provide a Request for Modification of Standards to the requirement for an 80 foot landscape buffer between building or parking lot edge and I-25 ROW. See Article Two - 2.8 for criteria and requirements for Modifications. DCI Engineers Response: Please refer to the request for modification of the required standards for the proposed reduction in the 80 foot landscape buffer. As discussed in the PDP walk-through, our proposed site is situated far below the interstate and a landscape buffer does not provide the intended benefit while hindering the applicant’s ability to develop a quality product. Please show a plan that complies with this standard in comparison to the proposed plan. See comments above for additional landscape planting along perimeter. RMS Response: Additional perimeter trees have been added. Department: Planning Services Town of Windsor Contact: Sandra Mezzetti, 970-674-2430, smezzetti@windsorgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/21/2020: INFORMATION ONLY: Thank you for the opportunity to review this development proposal. As you are aware, the proposed development is subject to an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) between the City of Fort Collins and the Town of Windsor, including land use and design standards. The proposed Maverik fuel sales and convenience store is an allowed use per the IGA. DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 2 01/16/2020: BY HEARING: Please provide additional screening and landscape buffering on the eastern edge of property in accordance with Fort Collins Land Use Code Sec. 3.9.4 RMS Response: Additional perimeter trees have been added. Comment Number: 3 01/16/2020: BY HEARING: Temporary irrigation recommended for seeded areas to encourage establishment. See Forestry comments related to adding existing trees on slope to landscape plan for coordination of City maintenance, watering etc. RMS Response: Irrigation plans will be provided at time of permit. Comment Number: 4 01/21/2020: INFORMATION ONLY: CAC fees will be due with the project: DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 5 01/16/2020: BY HEARING: This project is subject to revenue sharing DCI Response: Noted 5 Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Spencer Smith, 970-221-6603, smsmith@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/17/2020: BY HEARING: Please check the site location, vicinity map, etc. on the site plan and utility plan cover sheets. It looks like the incorrect project location is being referenced in a few places. See redlines. DCI Response: Verified and revised Vicinity Map location Comment Number: 2 01/17/2020: BY HEARING: Please provide sheet numbers on all plan sheets in the site plan and utility plans. DCI Response: Added sheet numbers to plan set. Comment Number: 3 01/17/2020: BY HEARING: Per LCUASS Appendix E-4, please include all applicable signature blocks as well as typical street section on the utility plan cover sheet. DCI Response: Added applicable review agency signature blocks to each sheet. Comment Number: 4 01/17/2020: BY HEARING: Per conceptual review engineering comment #2, the adjacent frontage road will need to be improved to City collector road standards. The plans need to include the proposed design of these roadway improvements. I believe that the road will be a Major Collector, but please coordinate with me to confirm that prior to adding that to your plans. DCI Response: the proposed design is based off LCUASS template for “Major Collector” street section. As noted in the previous comment responses, Maverik is proposing a modification to the collector standard with respect to the proposed public sidewalk. Due to nature of the CDOT drainageway, a separated sidewalk would be impractical. Comment Number: 5 01/17/2020: BY HEARING: Please include additional information on the easements that are called out on the utility plans. It should be clear what is existing, proposed, to be vacated by separate instrument, etc. See redlines. DCI Response: added additional notation to clarify each easement as existing, proposed, to be vacated and to be dedicated. Comment Number: 6 01/17/2020: BY HEARING: The proposed sidewalk at the site access are shown as attached. Attached walk is fine internal to the site, but the City standard calls for a detached walk along the frontage road. When you add the frontage road design to the plans, make sure you are connecting your internal walks to a detached walk. Also, the 6 walk should end at the southern side of the site access. It isn't likely that walk on the north side will ever connect to anything. See redlines. DCI Response: Maverik, Inc. is requesting a modification to the City standard for the detached sidewalk along Frontage Road. The roadway is not heavily trafficked by pedestrians and is hampered by an existing CDOT drainage swale within the public ROW. Implementation of a detached sidewalk would require the CDOT swale to be filled and replaced with underground piping. Comment Number: 7 01/17/2020: BUILDING PERMIT: There will be a repayment assessed for I-25 and SH 392 interchange improvements. The amount appears to be approximately $19,000 and will be due at time of building permit. The exact amount will be determined at that time by City finance staff. DCI Response: Noted Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/21/2020: FOR INFORMATION: The TIS has been received and reviewed. Staff did a follow up calculation to determine the weighted average delay at the intersection of the Frontage Road and Kechter (determined to be 27 sec in the short term total pm peak). Follow up coordination was also done with CDOT to determine if/when the Kechter overpass and Frontage Road intersection will be improved. It is a funded part of the I-25 projects slated for construction start in 2021. Since the LCUASS standard is met and since this can be assumed to be constructed within 3 years, this development will not responsible for any mitigation at that location. The bike and pedestrian Level of Service analysis was missing from the study. However, coordination work on adjacent street sidewalks will cover any requirements that would have come from that analysis. Therefore, the TIS results together with the above comments are accepted. DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 2 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING: Please work with the Engineering and Planning departments on adjacent street improvements, especially sidewalk connections. DCI Response: Noted. Maverik has submitted a proposed plan for an attached public sidewalk to the constructed as a part of the project. Comment Number: 4 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING / FINAL: We're coordinating with CDOT on their review (for approval / hearing) and needed access permits (for final). DCI Response: Noted Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-222-1801, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 7 01/15/2020: INFORMATION ONLY: No ESC materials required at PDP please submit with first FDP submittals in accordance with the City's stormwater criteria. The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft. and/or meets the criteria for a need for Erosion and Sediment Control Materials to be submitted. The erosion control requirements are located in the Stormwater Design Criteria in Chapter 2 Section 6.0 a copy of the requirements can be found at www.fcgov.com/erosion DCI Response: Noted FOR FINAL: Please submit an Erosion Control Report to meet City Criteria. Please submit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation based upon the accepted Erosion Control Plans to meet City Criteria. INFORMATION ONLY: Based upon the area of disturbance, State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre and should be pulled before Construction Activities begin. DCI Response: Noted Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-305-5989, dmogen@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 01/17/2020: FOR HEARING: Clarification is needed on the overall stormwater design including LID facilities and detention basin including outfall locations. Please see redlined drainage report and utility plans which provide additional detail and specific items to be addressed. I encourage you to reach out with any questions or to review potential revisions, and I’d be happy to set up a meeting or conference call to do so. DCI Response: Please refer to the revisions to the preliminary drainage report for clarifications on the proposed LID facilities and detention pond. Due to the required size of the necessary LID areas, sand filters were maintained in the design as upstream treatment prior to the stormwater detention within the pond. Comment Number: 3 01/17/2020: FOR HEARING: Spill containment for fueling areas must be provided. While called out in the drainage report, it is not clear this is included in the utility plans. DCI Response: Please refer to Sheet 6 of the Civil Utility Plans for a note referencing the proposed spill containment areas. The intent is to maintain an underground system to collect potential spills from the fueling islands. The containment shall be connected to a oil/water separator before connecting to the sanitary sewer system. Comment Number: 4 01/17/2020: FOR HEARING: Please review proposed landscaping for the sand filter areas. Maintenance of these areas requires regular stripping of the top layers of sand; therefore, grasses are not typically appropriate in these areas. For consideration - often the area around the sand filter is heavily landscaped to provide screening for the sand filter area. RMS Response: Seeding has been removed and sand filter areas have been adjusted to the extent possible to screen along perimeter, additional plating added for screening. 8 Comment Number: 5 01/17/2020: FOR HEARING: Please review Fort Collins Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines for Stormwater and Detention Facilities for ideas to potentially incorporate into the design - that document is available at: https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/pdf/stormwater_standards_and_guidelines.pdf RMS Response: Noted. Comment Number: 6 01/17/2020: INFORMATION: Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming upon future submittals as additional details are discovered. DCI Response: Noted Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-305-5989, dmogen@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/17/2020: INFORMATION: Please note this site is located in Fort Collins Loveland Water District (FCLWD) and South Fort Collins Sanitation District. DCI Response: Noted Department: Light And Power Contact: Cody Snowdon, 970-416-2306, csnowdon@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/15/2020: FOR INFORMATION City of Fort Collins Light and Power currently does not serve the site nor has any electric facilities close to the proposed project to serve it in the future. This site is currently served by Poudre Valley REA. DCI Response: Noted Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Kelly Smith, ksmith@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/20/2020: BY HEARING: In Fort Collins, prairie dog colonies one (1) acre or greater in size are considered special habitat features (see LUC 5.1 Definitions). In addition, the Land Use Code requires that any prairie dogs inhabiting a site must be relocated or humanely eradicated prior to development activities [LUC 3.4.1(N) (6)]. Mitigation options are based from onsite assessment and include trap and donate; active relocation; passive relocation; or payment in lieu. Please indicate how you intend to mitigate. DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 2 9 01/20/2020: FOR FINAL PLAN: Prior to issuance of the Development Construction Permit (DCP), and prior to prairie dog removal, please submit the results of a burrowing owl survey completed by a professional, qualified wildlife biologist, and in accordance with the Division of Parks and Wildlife standards if removal is between March 15 and October 31. Note the timing requirements of these surveys are between March 15 and October 31, as no burrowing owls are expected to be present between November 1 and March 14. This issue is required due to the presence of prairie dogs on the site. DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 3 01/20/2020: BY HEARING: If this project proceeds in the development review process, at least a concept prairie dog removal plan will be needed prior to Hearing. DCI Response: Maverik proposes the removal of the Prairie Dog colonies in any of the manners acceptable to the City of Fort Collins. We anticipate the use of relocation or termination of the colony, depending on the availability of relocation sites. Comment Number: 4 01/20/2020: FOR FINAL PLAN: Should this project achieve approval and proceed to construction, documentation needs to be provided prior to issuance of DCP (at least one week prior to DCP meeting is ideal) regarding the burrowing owl survey and the removal of black tailed prairie dogs. Documentation should be in the form of a signed letter or memo from the wildlife biologist for the survey, and from the contractor(s) for the relocation (date, time, methods). DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 5 01/20/2020: BY HEARING: Your lighting plan is resulting in too much light spillage onto adjacent public rights of way. Light levels measured twenty (20) feet beyond the property line of the development site (adjacent to residential uses or public rights-of-way) shall not exceed one-tenth (0.1) foot-candle as a direct result of the on-site lighting DCI Response: Please refer to the revised Photometric Plan for the revision to the proposed light levels, particularly in the areas around the public right of way. Comment Number: 6 01/20/2020: BY HEARING: The lighting immediately outside the building facade and below the fueling canopy are projecting too much light. Please ensure they fall under the maximum footcandles allowed in section 3.2 of the Land Use Code. If you intend for under-canopy lighting to exceed the maximum 20 footcandle, please add the following notes to the photometric plan: Footcandle under the fuel canopy must be reduced within a year after installation to meet the maximum 20 allowed per the City's Land Use Code. DCI Response: Please refer to the revised Photometric Plan for the revision to the proposed light levels, particularly in the areas around the public right of way. 10 Department: Forestry Contact: Nils Saha, nsaha@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 01/15/2020: FOR HEARING: Thank you for including the tree inventory. It appears that trees #1, 2 and 5 may be shared trees that straddle the property line. Are these shared trees between the Maverick property and CDOT? City Forestry maintains these trees. Will Maverick be taking over the maintenance responsibility for these shared trees? If not, will City Forestry have access? RMS Response: Trees 1 and 2 are inside Maverik property and will be maintained by Maverik. Tree #5 is being removed as it is dead. Number: 2 01/15/2020: FOR HEARING: Per engineering comments during the conceptual review phase, this project is responsible for frontage improvements, including curb, gutter, parkway and sidewalk design and construction. For a collector street, there should be a minimum 7-foot parkway with street trees along the frontage. RMS Response: Street trees have been added at 40’ o.c. See Variance request from engineer on street section. Comment Number: 3 01/15/2020: FOR HEARING: As a follow up to comment #3, please include the Street Tree Permit Note on the landscape plan. RMS Response: Street tree notes have been added to Landscape Notes sheet. Comment Number: 4 01/15/2020: FOR HEARING If additional trees need to be inventoried based on the frontage improvement requirements, please contact city forestry (nsaha@fcgov.com). RMS Response: No additional trees need to be inventoried, as they are not impacted by current site plan an/or grading. A note has been added to protect all other trees off site between property and ROW. Comment Number: 5 01/15/2020: FOR HEARING: Canopy shade trees should constitute at least 50 percent of all tree plantings. Please adjust percentages accordingly. RMS Response: Revised plan shows additional Canopy and street trees, canopy trees now are 61% of proposed trees. Comment Number: 6 01/15/2020: FOR HEARING: 11 Please include the diversity percentages for each species proposed. RMS Response: Additional tree species added to landscape palette. Comment Number: 7 01/15/2020: FOR HEARING: Please incorporate other species of evergreen trees in the palette. Junipers exceed the maximum percentage allowed. RMS Response: Junipers no longer exceed amount with additional trees proposed, new max percent is 25% of one species. Comment Number: 8 01/15/2020: INFORMATION ONLY: Generally, Forestry requires a Tree Removal Feasibility Letter for tree removals from the site. Given that there is one tree dead cottonwood proposed for removal, that requirement is waived. RMS Response: Noted, thank you. Comment Number: 9 01/15/2020: FOR HEARING: It appears that the site could use additional screening. Please refer to planning to determine whether site perimeter landscaping requirements have been met. RMS Response: Additional perimeter trees have been added on the east. Additional shrubs have been added to screening along the west. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 01 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING: MOTOR FUEL DISPENSING FACILITIES - The site plan shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable sections of IFC Chapter 23 as it pertains to fueling facilities. DCI Response: Noted. A Fire Access Plan has been added to the submittal for PFA reference. Comment Number: 02 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING: FLAMMABLE & COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS The site plan shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable sections of IFC Chapter 57 (and Chapter 50) as it pertains to flammable & combustible liquids. DCI Response: Noted. A Fire Access Plan has been added to the submittal for PFA reference. Comment Number: 03 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING: REQUIRED FIRE HYDRANT - The utility plans reference the installation of an offsite fire hydrant but I was not able to find any other information. Further details required: including location, who installed by and timing in relation to this project. DCI Response: 12 Noted. A Fire Access Plan has been added to the submittal for PFA reference. A fire hydrant was installed as a part of the Frontage Road improvements and utilities associated with the CDOT project. Comment Number: 04 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING: REQUIRED FIRE ACCESS - As stated in the conceptual review comments, a dedicated fire lane will be required. Future plans shall show the limits of the fire lane and demonstrate it is designed to minimum standards (provided below). DCI Response: Noted. A Fire Access Plan has been added to the submittal for PFA reference. Comment Number: 05 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING: FIRE LANE SPECIFICATIONS - A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the following general requirements: > Fire lanes established on private property shall be dedicated by plat or separate document as an Emergency Access Easement. > Maintain the required 20 foot minimum unobstructed width & 14 foot minimum overhead clearance. Where road widths exceed 20 feet in width, the full width shall be dedicated unless otherwise approved by the AHJ. > Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface capable of supporting 40 tons. > Dead-end fire access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround area for fire apparatus. > The required turning radii of a fire apparatus access road shall be a minimum of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside. Turning radii shall be detailed on submitted plans. > Be visible by red curb and/or signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. Sign locations or red curbing should be labeled and detailed on final plans. Refer to LCUASS detail #1418 & #1419 for sign type, placement, and spacing. Appropriate directional arrows required on all signs. DCI Response: See Fire Access Plan. Comment Number: 06 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING: FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION - Fire Department Connections shall be installed in accordance with NFPA standards. Fire department connections shall be located on the street side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle access. The location of the FDC shall be approved by the fire department and the location labeled on Utility Plans. DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 07 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING: KEY BOXES REQUIRED - Poudre Fire Authority requires at least one key box ("Knox Box") to be mounted in an approved, exterior location on every new or existing building equipped with a required fire sprinkler or fire alarm system. The box shall be positioned 3 to 7 feet above finished floor and within 10 feet of the front door, or closest door to the fire alarm panel. DCI Response: Noted 13 Comment Number: 08 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING: COMMERCIAL KITCHEN HOODS - A Type I hood shall be installed at or above all commercial cooking appliances and domestic cooking appliances used for commercial purposes that produce grease vapors. DCI Response: Noted Comment Number: 09 01/21/2020: FOR HEARING: ADDRESS POSTING - The architecture plans shall include a placeholder for posting of the building address as described in during conceptual review. DCI Response: Refer to architectural plans for details of the building address Department: Building Services Contact: Katy Hand, khand@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 01/21/2020: INFORMATIONAL: Please visit our website for a list of current adopted building codes and local amendments for building permit submittal: https://www.fcgov.com/building/codes.php DCI Response: Noted Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 2 01/21/2020: BUILDING PERMIT: A passing building air tightness test is required to be submitted prior to occupancy. DCI Response: Noted Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/17/2020: FOR INFORMATION: Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be done at FDP. DCI Response: Noted Department: Colorado Department of Transportation Contact: Gloria Hice-Idler, 970.381.8629, gloria.hice-idler@state.co.us Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/22/2020: INFORMATION ONLY: The permit for the access was written and the access constructed several years ago. CDOT has no further comment. DCI Response: Noted