HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTONERIDGE PUD OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 21 92B - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSSl
Commu y Planning and Environmental
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
May 20, 1992
Mr. Frank Vaught
Vaught - Frye Architects and Planners
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Frank:
rvices
Staff has held an interdepartmental review of the Stone Ridge
Overall Development Plan, and the Stone Ridge Preliminary P.U.D.,
First Filing. Staff comments, along with comments from outside
utility agencies are offered for your considerations.
Stone Ridge Overall Development Plan:
1. A master utility plan for the Overall Development Plan will be
required. Please contact Mike Herzig for the scope of these
plans.
2. As the project is phased, from west to east, the requirement
for a second point of access must be addressed. The second
point of access must -comply with the requirements of the
Poudre Fire Authority.
3. The "potential bike/pedestrian routes" should be 8 to 10 feet
wide to provide safe width for two directional travel, rather
than 6 to 8 feet wide as stated in the Planning Objectives.
The offstreet trail system must be prioritized, and not
perceived as an afterthought in order to promote its function.
Since these trails are not part of a recreational master
planned trail, the construction and maintenance shall be by
the developer. Also, please delete the word "potential". The
trail system is a critical connection in lieu of a public
local street. It is expected to be constructed with Phase One
development.
4. The Planning Department is working with the applicant to the
west in providing a bike/pedestrian connection at the end of
.the a cul-de-sac that could tie directly into Tract B. Such
a connection would promote non -vehicular circulation between
neighborhoods and further mitigate the absence of a local
street connection. Such a connection will be suggested to the
adjacent developer and the exact location will have to be
discussed and coordinated. Please indicate the potential for
this connection.
281 North College Avenue - P.O. Box 580 - Fort Collins, CO 80-522-0380 - (303) _12"1-r,750
5. Because of the north/south orientation of Parcel B. and since
it will be impossible to meet the solar lot orientation
requirement, you are encouraged to explore other options to
meet the intent of the ordinance. As referenced in the
Planning Objectives, six patio home lots may allow a south
orientation: This orientation is encouraged as. are other
methods designed to promote solar gain. The criteria for
granting a variance says that if the developer cannot meet the
"letter" of the law, then he should meet the intent. The
variance request should address this issue in detail.
6. The bike/pedestrian trail along the north property line and
drainage area should be referenced as being a component of the
Pine Cone O.D.P.
7. Please indicate the number of total potential units in the
Land Use Breakdown table.
Stone Ridge Preliminary, First Filing:
8. As of this writing, I have not received the new "dog -bone"
design of the patio homes on a 28 foot public street. The
generic comments for single family homes on a 28 foot street
are primarily based on the concern. of the Poudre Fire
Authority for unobstructed access for emergency equipment.
A. Lots that are single loaded do not present as much a
problem as lots that are double loaded.
B. For double loaded lots, try to make sure that driveways
are staggered across the street from each other. This
will force cars that are parked on the street to not be
directly opposite each other. Cars parked directly
opposite reduces unobstructed access down to 12 feet in
width. Poudre Fire Authority is very strict about
requiring a minimum of 20 feet of unobstructed access.
C. Parking stalls in cul-de-sac bulbs are encouraged, as are
other off-street spaces. These extra spaces will
minimize the impact of cars parked on the street. Extra
spaces should be dispersed throughout the patio home
area. Please provide a ratio of offstreet parking per
unit.
D. Please do not anticipate the 28 foot street becoming
signed for "No Parking" as this is difficult to enforce
in single family areas.
E. The Poudre Fire Authority allows the installation of
automatic residential fire extinguishers to trade-off for
variances in the requirements for unobstructed access.
9. U.S. West has responded with generic concerns as follows:
A. Review of these plans should not be construed as a
commitment that telephone facilities sufficient to serve
this 'project are presently available. U.S. West will
provide telephone service in accordance with the rates
and tariffs on file with the Colorado Public Utilities
Commission.
B. Telephone facilities generally occupy rear lot utility
easements, which must be located on terrain which permits
trenching operations. If the developer prefers a front -
lot telephone layout, then the front lot easement should
be wide enough to accommodate all utilities to be located
there.
C. The developer is responsible for provision of all
trenching for telephone facilities within the project,
and the developer pays up front construction costs for
facilities within the development.
.D. If open spaces are not to be described as utility
easements, then additional utility easements will be
required for most economical design of telephone
facilities.
E. Any relocation of existing telephone facilities required
by these plans will be paid for by the developer.
10. City of Fort Collins Light and Power Department will require
an eight foot wide easement along all dedicated internal
streets, and a 15 foot wide easement along Horsetooth Road.
11. Light and Power has designed the street lighting system for
the north side of Horsetooth Road and for Caribou Drive.
There are two deciduous shade trees on Horsetooth and two on
Caribou that may have to be pulled away from the streetlights
so there is 40 feet of separation from the fixture.A copy of
the streetlight plan and the affected trees will be provided.
12. The Final Plat should clearly delineate both front and rear
yard utility easements.
13. Columbine Cablevision prefers that drainage areas be
designated as "Drainage and Utility Easements".
14. The Sight Distance Easement should also be shown on the Final
Plat. The Engineering Department has some accompanying
language that should be placed on the P.U.D. site plan so.any
future lot owner is aware of the restrictions. These notes
are as follows:
"The area within the sight distance easements is restricted to
the following:
1. Fences shall not exceed 42 inches in height and shall be
of open design. If fences exceed 32 inches in height,
they shall be constructed of split rail (or open rail)
with a minimum of.12" between horizontal members.
2. Berms,'hedges, and shrubs shall not exceed 32 inches in
height.
3. Tree planting shall be restricted to deciduous trees
only. The lowest branch of any tree shall be no less
than 42 inches from grade."
15. It is not clear whether Caribou Drive aligns with existing
Caribou to the south. This should be verified.
16.. The islands in the public streets must be constructed and
maintained or repaired by the developer. Full depth asphalt
must be provided to account for irrigation overspray. The
extra right-of-way to account for standard lane widths must be
dedicated. Landscaping maintenance must be the responsibility
of the homeowner's association.
17. An additional fire hydrant must be provided at the corner of
Kingsley and Field Stone.
18. The name "Red Stone" conflicts with a Redstone Court within
the Poudre Fire Authority service district. Please select
another name to avoid confusion in providing emergency
services.
19. There is a mature stand of trees around the Webster farm house
and Staff applauds the effort to save a portion of these.
Please As with any project that affects mature trees, the
opinion of the City Forester is valuable. Please schedule a
meeting with Tim Buchanan, 221-6640, so an evaluation can be
made, prior to any removal.
20. It is likely that the 25 lots west of Caribou will be served
by one street address.
21. The bike/pedestrian path should be 8 to 10 feet wide for two
way travel. It should clearly be indicated that the path will
be built with Phase One.
22. The open space along the arterial street is an excellent
buffer will create a pleasing streetscape. The street trees
along Horsetooth will be maintained or replaced by the City
Forestry Department after the entire project (all phases) is
completed, as long as they are placed within the public right-
of-way. Surface treatment, irrigation, and mowing, will be
the responsibility of the homeowner's association.
23. The seed mixture for the open space areas is encouraged to be
drought -tolerant to promote water conservation. A seed
Q
mixture will be required at the time of Final P.U.D.
24. Please indicate the plans for common fencing. This could be
done as a schematic design on the P.U.D. site plan.
2r, The number ind percentage of solar oriented Pots should be
included in the Land Use Breakdown table. Lots 4, 29, and 36
do not appear to be within 30 degrees of a north/south line.
26. The site plan indicates a 10 foot rear yard setback along the
west property line. Will this be sufficient given the nature
of the proposed development to the west?
27. Please include the vicinity map on the revised plans.
This concludes Staff comments at this time. In order to stay on
schedule for the June 22, 1992 Planning and Zoning Board meeting,
please note the following deadlines:
Plan revisions are due June 3, 1992
P.M.T.'s, 10 prints, renderings are due June 15, 1992.
If you have any questions or concerns about these comments, or
would like to set up a meeting, please feel free to call our
office.
Sincerely:
Ted Shepard
Senior Planner
xc: Sherry Albertson -Clark, Chief Planner
Kerrie Ashbeck, Civil Engineer