HomeMy WebLinkAboutAPEX HAVEN APARTMENTS - PDP190017 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - DRAINAGE REPORTPRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
1501 ACADEMY CT. STE 203 | FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 | 970-530-4044 | www.unitedcivil.com
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
Replat of Lots 1 and 2, The Slab Property
Observatory Park Subdivision
Fort Collins, CO
Prepared for:
Maxiiimo Development and Asset
Management Group, LLC
720/730 West Prospect Road
Fort Collins, CO 80526
Date:
March 4, 2020
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
i U19031_Drainage Report
March 4, 2020
City of Fort Collins
Stormwater Utility
700 Wood Street
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
RE: Apex-Haven Apartments
Fort Collins, Colorado
Project Number: U19031
Dear Staff:
United Civil Design Group, LLC. is pleased to submit this Preliminary Drainage Report for the Apex-Haven Apartments site in
Fort Collins, Colorado. In general, this report serves to document the stormwater impacts associated with the proposed
improvements related to the existing site.
We understand that review by the City of Fort Collins is to assure general compliance with standardized criteria contained in
the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM). This report was prepared in compliance with technical criteria set forth
in both the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual and the Fort Collins
Stormwater Criteria Manual.
If you should have any questions or comments as you review this report, please feel free to contact us at your convenience.
Sincerely,
United Civil Design Group
Colton Beck, PE Kevin Brazelton, PE
Project Engineer Principal
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
ii U19031_Drainage Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. General Location and Description ......................................................................................................................1
A. Location and Project Description ................................................................................................. 1
B. Description of Property ................................................................................................................ 2
C. Floodplains ................................................................................................................................... 2
II. Drainage Basins and Sub-Basins .........................................................................................................................3
A. Major Basin Description ............................................................................................................... 3
B. Sub-Basin Description .................................................................................................................. 3
III. Drainage Design Criteria ....................................................................................................................................3
A. Regulations ................................................................................................................................... 3
B. Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA) ................................................................................ 3
C. Hydrological Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 4
D. Hydraulic Criteria.......................................................................................................................... 4
E. Modifications of Criteria .............................................................................................................. 4
IV. Drainage Facility Design .....................................................................................................................................4
A. General Concept ........................................................................................................................... 4
B. Specific Details ............................................................................................................................. 4
V. Erosion Control ................................................................................................................................................ 10
VI. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................................... 10
A. Compliance with Standards ....................................................................................................... 10
B. Drainage Concept ....................................................................................................................... 10
C. Stormwater Quality .................................................................................................................... 10
VII. References ................................................................................................................................................... 11
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A – Hydrology Calculations
APPENDIX B – Hydraulic Calculations
B.1 – Low Impact Development Calculations
B.2 – Water Quality Calculations
B.3 – Detention Pond and Orifice Calculations
B.4 – Inlet Sizing Calculations (Reserved for Final Submittal)
B.5 – Storm Pipe Calculations (Reserved for Final Submittal)
B.6 – Curb Channel Calculations (Reserved for Final Submittal)
B.7 – Weir Calculation (Reserved for Final Submittal)
APPENDIX C – Referenced Materials
APPENDIX D – Drainage Exhibits
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
1 U19031_Drainage Report
I. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
A. LOCATION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Apex-Haven Apartments site (referred herein as “the site”) is proposed as a replat Lots 1 and 2 of The Slab Property,
located in the southwest quarter of Section 14, T7N, R69W of the 6th P.M., City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado. The
property, consisting of approximately 2.63 acres, is located immediately north of West Prospect Road, approximately 750-
feet west of South Whitcomb Street and currently exists as a residential property with an apartment complex, two single
family structures and a recently constructed detention pond. The proposed Apex-Haven site improvements are limited to
1.19 acres on the east side of the property, formerly recognized as “Lot 2” of the Slab Property. The recently developed
portion of the property to the west (formerly known as Lot 1) is referred herein as “The Slab” property.
The property is bounded by West Prospect Road to the south, a recently developed apartment complex to the west, a single-
family residence to the east, and an existing apartment complex to the north. Stormwater on the site currently drains
southeast via sheet flow to West Prospect Road and is then conveyed easterly to storm sewer infrastructure associated with
the Old Town master drainage basin.
The proposed development of the site consists of the restoration of two existing on-site single-family residences and the
construction of a new apartment building with a 14,060-sf footprint. Associated with the apartment building and existing
residence improvements are proposed drive lanes, parking, utilities, an underground water quality facility, and improvements
to the existing on-site detention pond. On-site stormwater, both detained and undetained, is largely designed to discharge
to West Prospect Road.
FIGURE 1: SITE VICINITY MAP
This drainage report presents the overall drainage plan for the development. In general, this report serves to provide an
analysis of the drainage impacts associated with the development of site as it relates to existing and proposed drainage
facilities on-site.
W Prospect Rd
S Whitcomb St
W Lake St
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
2 U19031_Drainage Report
B. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The project site currently exists largely as a gravel and grass/weed landscape, and also includes concrete pavement and
rooftop, comprising of an existing imperviousness of 11.6%. In its historic condition, the site primarily sheet flows in two
general directions: southeast where it is conveyed to West Prospect Road, and off-site to the north and northeast. In its
existing (non-historic) condition, a minor portion of the site drains to a recently constructed detention pond associated with
the development of “The Slab” property to the west. Similar to historic flows, runoff conveyed to the existing detention pond
is ultimately released to West Prospect Road.
Below are summaries of key components of the site in its existing conditions.
Land Use - The site’s current land use is residential.
Ground Cover - The site exists with two residential homes with gravel/dirt driveways and surrounding weed/grass
landscaping. The weed/grass cover is good (ie., heavy or dense cover with nearly all ground surfaces protected by
vegetation).
Existing Topography – Historically, the site slopes in two general directions: northeasterly and southeasterly.
Approximately the southern half of the property drains southeasterly to West Prospect Road, and minor portion of
this area drains initially to a recently constructed detention pond associated with the development to the west. The
northern portion of the site drains off-site to the northeast.
Grades – In general, the northern portion of the site is sloped northeasterly at approximately 1.0% to 5.0%; the
southern portion of the site is sloped southeasterly at approximately 1.0% to 10.0%
Soil Type - The USDA’s Web Soil Survey shows that the site consists of a “Type B” soil. The Web Soil Survey indicates
the site is comprised of Altvan Santana Loams (0 to 3% slopes). The on-site soils provide moderate infiltration and
are suitable for development.
Utilities – The following dry utility lines run along the south side of the site: gas, electric, cable TV, fiber optic. Water
mains are also present on the south side of the site within West Prospect Road. A recently constructed sanitary
sewer service exists at the northwest portion of the site.
Drainage Features and Storm Sewer – A recently constructed detention pond exists at the southwest corner of the
site, releasing runoff to West Prospect Road immediately to the South.
C. FLOODPLAINS
The proposed development is not in a FEMA designated
floodplain. According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map
Panel, the site is zoned as an area outside of the 500-year
floodplain. The FEMA FIRM Map is included in the appendix.
FIGURE 2: FLOODPLAIN MAP
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
3 U19031_Drainage Report
II. DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB-BASINS
A. MAJOR BASIN DESCRIPTION
The proposed development is located within the Old Town Basin, located primarily in Old Town Fort Collins. No known master
planning improvements are associated with or adjacent to the site.
B. SUB-BASIN DESCRIPTION
“The Slab” portion of the property, formerly recognized as Lot 1, was previously analyzed in a Final Drainage Report entitled
“The Slab,” dated September 21, 2016 by Northern Engineering. The development of this area provided the addition of
concrete drives, and sidewalks. Improvements also included a detention pond on the Apex-Have site (formerly known as Lot
2). This recently constructed pond is re-analyzed in conjunction with the proposed on-site improvements.
In its developed condition, runoff from the site will largely be directed south to the on-site detention pond either via overland
flow to surface improvements or via proposed storm sewer. Due to site grading constraints, a portion of the site will continue
to drain directly to West Prospect Road undetained. A minor portion of the site – a largely decreased area relative to historic
conditions – is designed to continue draining off-site to the north and northeast.
III. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
A. REGULATIONS
The design criteria for this study are directly from the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria and Construction
Standards Manual and the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manuals Volumes 2, and 3 (referred to herein as USDCM).
B. DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA (DCIA)
With the adoption of the USDCM, the City has also adopted the “Four Step Process” that is recommended in Volume 3 of
the USDCM in selecting structural BMPs for the redeveloping urban areas. The following portions of this summary describe
each step and how it has been utilized for this project:
Step 1 – Employ Runoff Reduction Practices
The objective of this step is to reduce runoff peaks and volumes and to employ the technique of “minimizing directly
connected impervious areas” (MDCIA). This project accomplishes this by:
Routing the roof and pavement flows through a bioretention facility, underground water quality treatment/infiltration
facilities and vegetated swales to increase time of concentration, promote infiltration and provide water quality.
Step 2 – Provide Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV)
The objective of providing WQCV is to reduce the sediment load and other pollutants that exit the site. For this project
WQCV is provided within underground treatment facilities and a bioretention pond.
Step 3 – Stabilize Drainageways
The site is not adjacent or near a major drainageway; however, this project will pay stormwater development and
stormwater utility fees which the City uses, in part, to maintain the stability of the City drainageway systems.
Step 4 – Consider Need for Site Specific and Source Control BMPs
Site specific and source control BMPs are generally considered for large industrial and commercial sites. The
redevelopment of the existing site will include multiple site specific and source controls, including:
Dedicated maintenance personnel providing landscape maintenance and snow and ice management.
Dedicated dog park.
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
4 U19031_Drainage Report
C. HYDROLOGICAL CRITERIA
City of Fort Collins Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves, provided by Figure RA-16 of the Fort Collins Stormwater
Criteria Manual, are utilized for all hydrologic computations related to the site in its existing/historic and proposed conditions.
Since this site is relatively small and does not have complex drainage basins, the peak flow rates for design points have been
calculated based on the Rational Method as described in the USDCM and the City of Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual
(FCSCM) with storm duration set equal to the time of concentration for each sub-basin. This method was used to analyze the
developed runoff from the 10-year (minor) and the 100-year (major) storm events. The Rational Method is widely accepted
for drainage design involving small drainage areas (less than 160 acres) and short time of concentrations. Runoff coefficients
are assumed based on impervious area and are given in the Appendices.
D. HYDRAULIC CRITERIA
The developed site will convey runoff to the proposed pond or underground treatment facility via swales, concrete channels,
and pipes. The City of Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM) and USDCM are referenced for all hydraulic
calculations. In addition, the following computer programs are utilized:
Storm Sewer Extension for AutoCAD Civil3D
Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCAD Civil3D
UD-Inlet by UDFCD
Drainage conveyance facility capacities proposed with the development project, including storm sewer, swales, and inlet
capacities, are designed in accordance with criteria outlined in the FCSCM and/or the Urban Drainage and Flood Control
District’s Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (UDFCD).
E. MODIFICATIONS OF CRITERIA
Hardships related to a lack of public storm sewer adjacent to the site and the limited number of solutions available to the site
due to the historic preservation requirements of existing on-site residences present difficulties in limiting the release of on-
site runoff to the historic 2-year event. A separate variance request has been submitted to allow a design of the proposed
site that provides runoff release to West Prospect Road, in addition to release off-site the north, at values that do not exceed
the historic 100-year condition. Moreover, a bioretention pond related to the site improvements is designed with a 6-in
bioretention media section, as opposed to a standard 18-in section per City of Fort Collins standards. Finally, due to area
constraints associated with maintaining existing trees adjacent to Pond B, the detention volume for the pond is inclusive of
the water quality volume required for the basin.
IV. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN
A. GENERAL CONCEPT
Developed runoff is designed to be conveyed in a safe and effective manner via swales, concrete channels, and storm sewer
systems/inlets. Stormwater is designed to be released to West Prospect Road at a rate equivalent to the 100-year historic
flow rate. Runoff that drains off-site to the north is heavily reduced with the proposed site; runoff from the site in its improved
condition is primarily conveyed to bioretention, detention, and underground water quality facilities, all of which are designed
at the southern end of the property. Due to grading constraints, not all on-site runoff is fully detained - these areas are
considered in the overall release rate from the site.
B. SPECIFIC DETAILS
Hydrology
As previously stated, hydrology from the developed site is designed to comply with criteria set forth in the City of Fort Collins
Stormwater Criteria Manual with exception of the modifications stated in the “Modification of Criteria” section. Referenced
tables, charts, formulas, etc. are included in the appendices. The area, time of concentration, and runoff of each proposed
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
5 U19031_Drainage Report
sub-basin is summarized in Appendix A. The following information outlines the basin characteristics and drainage patterns
for each basin.
On-site Basins
The following basins provide proposed drainage delineations for the site in its improved condition. Note that Basins S1 and
ON1 are per “The Slab” report by Northern Engineering. Refer to Appendix A for hydrology computations and Appendix B for
calculations related to Detention, Water Quality, Low Impact Development, and other hydraulic features.
Basin A
Sub-basins A1-A3 (see Drainage Plan attached) are generally located around the south and southeast region of the site. These
basins consist of roofs, concrete paving, and landscaping. Runoff within these Basins is conveyed to an underground water
quality system (Pond A) via inlets and downspouts. Runoff conveyed to the underground water quality system is ultimately
discharged southeast of the site to West Prospect Road via a concrete curb channel.
Basin B
Sub-basins B1-B3 represent on-site drainage basins where runoff is captured and conveyed to an on-site bioretention and
detention pond (Pond B). These basins consist of roofs, concrete paving and landscaping. Sub-basin B1 largely consists of the
pond area - runoff within this area drains directly to the pond via sheet flow or by means of storm sewer related to “The Slab”
property. Runoff within sub-basin B2 is conveyed to the Pond B via curb and a concrete channel, and runoff within sub-basin
B3 is conveyed to Pond B via a roof drain system. The proposed pond area is designed to receive flows from “The Slab”
property immediately west of the site, however, these flows are treated by upstream, off-site infrastructure. An outlet
structure is proposed with the mentioned pond and is designed to release stormwater to West Prospect Road.
Basin C
Sub-basins C1 and C2 consists primarily of roofing, concrete walks, and landscaped area. Runoff within these basins is
conveyed to a proposed detention pond (Pond C) via sheet flow and storm sewer/roof drains.
Basin D
Sub-basins D1 and C2, consists primarily of landscaped area and concrete pavement. Due to grading constraints, runoff
developed within these basin drains off-site undetained to the south and southeast via sheet flow.
Basin E
Basin E1, similar to Basins D1 and D2, consists primarily of landscaped area concrete pavement. Due to grading constraints,
runoff developed within this basin drains off-site undetained to the north and northeast via sheet flow.
Basin ON1
Basin ON1 is a drainage basin associated with the design and construction of “The Slab” property, per the Northern
Engineering Final Drainage Report. This approved drainage report provided a design with runoff draining off-site to the north.
The on-site improvements are expected to have negligible impact on the original design of Basin ON1.
Basin S1
Basin S1 is a drainage basin associated with the design and construction of “The Slab” property, per the Northern Engineering
Final Drainage Report. This approved drainage report provided a design with runoff draining further on-site form the west.
The on-site improvements are expected to have negligible impact on the original design of Basin S1.
Stormwater Quality
I. Underground Water Quality
An underground water quality facility is designed to divert storm water runoff during the water quality event and
treat the flows through infiltration prior to being collected within an underdrain system. This provides for the
removal of sediment and other pollutants from the runoff while also promoting infiltration. Underground water
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
6 U19031_Drainage Report
quality chambers are designed to collect and treat storm water runoff from Basins A1-A3 and Basins C1-C2 prior to
being released to West Prospect Road.
The underground water quality system, designated as “Pond A” is designed with a volume of 310-cf. This 310-cf
exceeds the minimum design requirements for the area (299-cf). Below is a summary table for water quality related
to all “A” and “C” Basins. Refer to Appendix B for additional information.
Pond
WQCV
Required
(cf)
WQCV
Provided
(cf)
WQ
Release Rate
(cfs)
Pond A 299 310 0.16
II. Bioretention
Bioretention is designed to remove sediment and pollution from stormwater runoff via infiltration through an
engineered sand media. This slows the conveyance rate of storm water runoff, reduces runoff and provides a flow
path across a vegetated surface. A bioretention pond is proposed with the site improvements and is utilized to
convey and treat stormwater prior to release to West Prospect Road.
The proposed bioretention pond, a reconstruction of the existing detention pond, is designed to maintain its existing
top-of-pond elevation per “The Slab” Final Drainage Report. Moreover, the pond in its existing condition is designed
to overflow to the south in West Prospect Road – the overflow weir will remain as designed despite reconstruction.
Per “The Slab” report, the original pond was designed with excess capacity of approximately 3,000-cf for detention,
however, the proposed site improvements require detention of a significantly larger volume due to the extent of
growth in impervious area relative to historic conditions. Therefore, an expansion in the size of the constructed pond
is necessary for the managing of developed stormwater in a safe and effective manner.
The proposed bioretention pond is designed to provide about 1,040-sf of bioretention area and is located at the
bottom of the detention pond. Provided six inches of depth, approximately 495-cf of the pond’s volume is specifically
intended for bioretention purposes – this volume exceeds the required WQCV for Basins B1-B3 (392-cf). Ponding
above the initial six inches of pond depth is intended for detention purposes further discussed in the report. Below
is a summary of the bioretention pond, recognized as Pond B:
Pond Bottom of
Pond Elevation
Bioretention
WSEL
Bioretention Volume
Required
(cf)
Bioretention Volume
Provided
(cf)
Pond B 5022.50 5023.00 392 495
Low Impact Development (LID)
In December of 2015, Fort Collins City Council adopted the revised Low Impact Development (LID) policy and criteria which
requires developments within City limits to meet certain enhanced stormwater treatment requirements in addition to more
standard treatment techniques. The proposed development will be required to meet the newly adopted LID criteria which
requires the following:
- Treat no less than 75% of any newly added impervious area using one or a combination of LID techniques.
- Treat no less than 50% of any newly added impervious area using one or a combination of LID techniques when at
least 25% of any newly added pavement is provided with permeable pavement.
The following measures are implemented with this proposed development:
I. Underground Water Quality
Basins A1-A3 and C1-C2, combined for 8,180-sf of proposed impervious area, are designed to be routed through an
underground water quality system located in the southeastern portion of the site. The proposed impervious area
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
7 U19031_Drainage Report
treated through underground water quality includes existing and proposed roof areas. The underground water
quality system is designed with an overall capacity of 310-cf. This 310-cf exceeds the minimum design requirements
for the area. This system is in conjunction with an adjacent underground detention system with an equivalent
capacity. Refer to Appendix B for additional information.
II. Bioretention
Basins B1-B3, with 14,771-sf of proposed impervious area, are designed to be conveyed to a Pond B, a proposed
bioretention facility. The proposed impervious area treated through bioretention includes existing roof areas.
Approximately 1,040-sf of the pond with six inches of depth is designed specifically for water quality.
Without the use of permeable pavement, the site is required to treat no less than 75% of added impervious area. Provided
the LID measures noted above, approximately 92% of the site is treated in its improved condition. Refer to Appendix B for
calculations
Detention
I. Pond A
The design of Pond A is intended for underground water quality purposes; underground detention is not considered
with the site improvements. In the 100-year event, runoff conveyed to the underground water pond is designed to
bypass the facility and be released at the improved site’s 100-year flows (0.55-cfs).
II. Pond B
As mentioned in the above section regarding the bioretention pond, ponding depth above the six inches of depth
designed for bioretention is reserved for detention purposes. Due to site and grading constraints, the 100-yr event
design capacity includes the volume typically utilized for water quality purposes. The required detention volume for
Pond B is a function of both the cumulative impact of impervious areas associated with the pond, and the overall
release rate to West Prospect Road. The designed volume of the detention is 6,788cf – this volume exceeds that of
the required volume for drainage basins related to Pond B (Basins B1-B3 in addition a 0.49-ac basin conveyed to the
Pond from “The Slab” property per the Northern Engineering Report). Runoff in an event that exceeds the 100-yr
storm is designed to drain to West Prospect Road via a reconstructed emergency overflow weir similar to that of
what was designed and constructed with “The Slab” property’s detention pond. Below is a summary of the detention
feature related to Pond B:
Pond Bottom of
Pond
Detention
WSEL
Top of Pond
Elevation
Detention Volume
Required
(cfs)
Detention Volume
Provided
(cf)
100-yr
Release Rate
(cfs)*
Pond B 5022.50 5026.00 5026.60 6,422 6,788 0.93
* 0.93-cfs includes 0.30-cfs of treated runoff from the Slab Property, not included in the cumulative “on-site” release to West Prospect Road
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
8 U19031_Drainage Report
III. Pond C
A proposed detention system is associated with Basins C1 and C2. This system is designed to release captured runoff
within at a rate of 0.28-cfs in the 100-yr event. This release rate is controlled by its relationship with the site’s overall
release rate to West Prospect Road (see the following page). Smaller storm events (i.e. water quality events) are
designed to pass through the pond without any significant storage in the pond. To reduce the risk of stormwater
infiltrating from the pond during larger storm events and into the adjacent basement of Building 3 and/or
neighboring properties, the pond will be lined with a minimum of a 30-mil PVC liner outside of the wall limits (Refer
to the Construction Plans a pond wall detail). Additionally, to further protect Building 3, a foundation drain with a
sump pump located in the basement of the building will be provided. For emergency situations the pond is designed
to spill stormwater through the emergency overflow structure which is located at the southeast corner of the pond
wall. Water discharged from the emergency overflow will be directed via an onsite drainage swale from the overflow
location to the eastern property line south of Building 3 and south of the existing residence east of the site. Once at
the property line, water will be conveyed along the property line to West Prospect Road.
Below is a summary of Pond C utilizing the FAA method:
Pond
Detention Volume
Required
(cf)
Detention Volume
Provided
(cf)
100-yr
Release Rate
(cfs)
Pond C 922 1,080 0.28
Drainage Summary
A basin summary table is included below:
Existing/Historic Basins
Basin Area %I C2 C100 Q2 Q100
(acre) (cfs) (cfs)
EX1 0.64 15.9% 0.35 0.44 0.50 2.29
EX2 0.55 11.6% 0.32 0.40 0.38 1.64
Total 0.88 3.93
Proposed Basins
Basin Area %I C2 C100 Q2 Q100
(acre) (cfs) (cfs)
A1 0.02 90.0% 0.95 1.00 0.05 0.19
A2 0.03 45.6% 0.60 0.75 0.05 0.24
A3 0.01 90.0% 0.95 1.00 0.03 0.12
B1 0.19 16.7% 0.37 0.46 0.17 0.76
B2 0.27 66.7% 0.76 0.96 0.59 2.55
B3 0.14 90.0% 0.95 1.00 0.39 1.42
C1 0.06 30.7% 0.48 0.60 0.08 0.33
C2 0.14 90.0% 0.95 1.00 0.38 1.41
D1 0.11 31.8% 0.49 0.61 0.15 0.66
D2 0.06 2.0% 0.25 0.31 0.04 0.17
E1 0.06 22.4% 0.41 0.51 0.07 0.31
S1 0.04 48.9% 0.62 0.78 0.07 0.31
ON1 0.06 43.9% 0.58 0.72 0.10 0.43
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
9 U19031_Drainage Report
Refer to Appendix D for a Historic Drainage Exhibit that provides a visual representation of Historic Basins EX1 and EX2. In its
improved condition, the total release of on-site runoff to West Prospect Road is designed not to exceed the historic 100-yr
condition (e.g. Basin EX1). Similarly, on-site runoff that drains off-site to the north is improved in the 100-yr event. Below are
summary tables of the on-site runoff release in the 100-yr event:
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
In order for physical stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be effective, proper maintenance is essential.
Maintenance includes both routinely scheduled activities, as well as non-routine repairs that may be required after large
storms, or as a result of other unforeseen problems. Standard Operating Procedures should clearly identify BMP maintenance
responsibility. BMP maintenance is typically the responsibility of the entity owning the BMP.
Identifying who is responsible for maintenance of BMPs and ensuring that an adequate budget is allocated for maintenance
is critical to the long-term success of BMPs. Maintenance responsibility may be assigned either publicly or privately. For this
project, the privately owned BMPs including grass swales, underground water quality and detention, and the bioretention
pond, are to be maintained by the property owner.
Storm Sewers
There are multiple storm sewer networks proposed with the site improvements. Related to conveyance of runoff to the
bioretention pond, multiple roof drain systems interconnected with an outfall to the bioretention pond. Other roof drains,
storm drains, and underground water quality features are interconnected with an outfall to West Prospect Road. All storm
sewers will be private and are sized to accommodate the flows from the 100-year storm event. Hydraulic computations of
these systems will be provided with the initial final compliance submittal.
Inlets
There are multiple inlets proposed with the site improvements, including nyloplast drain basins and a Type R inlet. The Type
R Inlet is designed on-grade to capture runoff developed within Basin A1. On-site drain basins are designed in a sump
condition and are designed to convey runoff produced within smaller interior basins to the underground detention system.
All inlets on the site are sized to provide adequate capacity and convey the 100-year storm event. Hydraulic computations
of these systems will be provided with the initial final compliance submittal.
100-yr Event: On-site release to West Prospect Road
Basin/Pond
Designation
Release Rate
(cfs)
Basin EX1 2.29
*Slab Property 0.30
Existing Release 2.59
Basin D1 0.66
Basin D2 0.17
Pond A 0.55
Pond B 0.93
Pond C 0.28
Proposed Release 2.59
* Runoff drained to Pond B from “The Slab” property per the Northern
Engineering report is included in the Pond B release, however, this flowrate
(0.30-cfs) is not included in “on-site” release calculations.
100-yr Event: On-site release to North
Basin/Pond
Designation
Release Rate
(cfs)
Basin EX2 1.64
Existing Release 1.64
Basin E1 0.31
Basin ON1 0.43
Proposed Release 0.74
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
10 U19031_Drainage Report
V. EROSION CONTROL
A separate Erosion Control Report / Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) will be prepared for the site in accordance with
the Stormwater Discharge Permit for Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment as the site will disturb an area
greater than 1-acre. The Erosion Control Report will be completed during the Final Compliance phase of the project and will
include more detailed information on the sediment and erosion control items for this project. It is intended that the proposed
improvements will comply with Erosion Control Criteria per the FCSCM, and all Erosion Control Materials will be provided
with the Final Drainage Report. At a minimum, the following temporary BMP’s will be installed and maintained to control
on-site erosion and prevent sediment from traveling off-site during construction:
Silt Fence – a woven synthetic fabric that filters runoff. The silt fence is a temporary barrier that is placed at the base
of a disturbed area.
Vehicle Tracking Control – a stabilized stone pad located at points of ingress and egress on a construction site. The
stone pad is designed to reduce the amount of mud transported onto public roads by construction traffic.
Riprap – Riprap will be used downstream of all storm sewer outfalls to control erosion of the receiving channels.
Inlet Protection – acts as a sediment filter. It is a temporary BMP and requires proper installation and maintenance
to ensure their performance.
Straw Wattles – wattles act as a sediment filter in swales around inlets. They are a temporary BMP and require
proper installation and maintenance to ensure their performance.
Slope Protection – Slopes should be terraced using a “tracked” vehicle, run perpendicular to slope to inhibit rill/gulley
erosion.
The contractor shall store all construction materials and equipment and shall provide maintenance and fueling of equipment
in confined areas on-site from which runoff will be contained and filtered. Temporary Best Management Practices (BMP’s)
will be inspected by the contractor at a minimum of once every two weeks and after each significant storm event.
VI. CONCLUSIONS
A. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS
Storm drainage calculations have followed the guidelines provided by the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manuals Volumes
1, 2 and 3 and the City of Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual.
B. DRAINAGE CONCEPT
The drainage system has been designed to convey the runoff to the designated design points and the existing public
infrastructure in an effective, safe manner. No negative impacts are anticipated to the City of Fort Collins Master Drainage
Plan or to downstream properties or infrastructure due to the proposed improvements.
C. STORMWATER QUALITY
Multiple long-term stormwater quality measures have been selected for the site that will provide treatment of stormwater
prior it to being discharged from the site. For this site this includes grass swales, a bioretention pond, and underground water
quality.
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
FORT COLLINS, CO
11 U19031_Drainage Report
VII. REFERENCES
1. City of Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual, City of Fort Collins, Colorado, November 2017.
2. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1 and 2, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, Colorado,
June 2001, Revised April 2008.
3. Final Drainage Report for The Slab, Northern Engineering, Fort Collins, Colorado, September 2016.
4. Final Drainage Report for Observatory Park, DMW Civil Engineers, Fort Collins, Colorado, August 2007.
5. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey at: websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app
6. Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map, FEMA, Panel 2079E, https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/
7. Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity, Stormwater Management Plan Preparation Guides, State
of Colorado, www.colorado.com
APPENDIX A
HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS
RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS AND % IMPERVIOUS
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
Basin Design Pt. Composite NRCS Soil
Total Total Roof
(1)
Asphalt Concrete
(1)
Gravel
(1)
Lawns
(1)
Imperviousness Type C2
C100
%I = 90% %I = 100% %I = 90% %I =40% %I=2% (%I)
acres sf sf sf sf sf sf
EX1 EX1 0.64 27,985 2,310 760 3,127 21,788 15.9% 0.35 0.44
EX2 EX2 0.55 24,067 1,233 262 2,602 19,970 11.6% 0.32 0.40
- - - - -
1.19 52,052 3,543 - 1,022 5,729 41,758 13.9% 0.34 0.42
Basin Design Pt. Composite NRCS Soil
Total Total Roof
(1)
Asphalt Concrete
(1) Permeable
Pavement
Lawns
(1)
Imperviousness Type C
2 C100
acres sf %I = 90% %I = 100% %I = 90% %I =40% %I=2% (%I)
sf sf sf sf sf
A1 A1 0.02 849 849 - - 90.0% 0.95 1.00
A2 A2 0.03 1,393 690 - 703 45.6% 0.60 0.75
A3 A3 0.01 525 525 - - - 90.0% 0.95 1.00
B1 B1 0.19 8,260 745 631 - 6,884 16.7% 0.37 0.46
B2 B2 0.27 11,703 982 7,620 - 3,101 66.7% 0.76 0.96
B3 B3 0.14 6,212 6,212 - - - 90.0% 0.95 1.00
C1 C1 0.06 2,435 460 335 - 1,640 30.7% 0.48 0.60
C2 C2 0.14 6,178 6,178 - - - 90.0% 0.95 1.00
D1 D1 0.11 4,757 1,609 - 3,148 31.8% 0.49 0.61
D2 D2 0.06 2,735 - - 2,735 2.0% 0.25 0.31
E1 E1 0.06 2,636 610 - 2,026 22.4% 0.41 0.51
S1 S1 0.04 1,760 937 - 823 48.9% 0.62 0.78
ON1 ON1 0.06 2,609 1,161 188 1,260 43.9% 0.58 0.72
- - - -
1.19 52,052 15,102 - 14,442 188 22,320 52.1% 0.65 0.81
Notes:
(1) Recommended % Imperviousness Values per USDCM Volume 1, Table 6-3.
(2) Runoff C is based on %I and NRCS soil group per UDFCD Volume 1, Table 6-4.
Proposed Total
Composite Runoff Coefficients
(2)
Areas
Existing Basins
Proposed Basins
Existing Total
Areas Composite Runoff Coefficients
(2)
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
2-YEAR TIME OF CONCENTRATION
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
Basin Design Pt. Area
C(1) Length Slope ti
(2) Length Slope Cv Velocity (3) tt
(4) Check tc? Total Length tc
(5)
acres ft % min ft % fps min min Urban? ft min min
EX1 EX1 0.64 0.35 130 4.0% 9.7 95 1.6% 20
2.5 0.6 10.3 Yes 225 11 10.3
EX2 EX2 0.55 0.32 115 3.3% 10.2 145 0.5% 15 1.1 2.3 12.5 Yes 260 11 11.4
Basin Design Pt. Area
C(1) Length Slope ti
(2) Length Slope Cv Velocity (3) tt
(4) Check tc? Total Length tc
(5)
acres ft % min ft % fps min min Urban? ft min min
A1 A1 0.02 0.95 60 4.0% 1.3 10 5.5% 20
4.7 0.0 1.4 Yes 70 10 5.0
A2 A2 0.03 0.60 25 5.0% 2.7 105 4.0% 15 3.0 0.6 3.3 Yes 130 11 5.0
A3 A3 0.01 0.95 45 6.0% 1.0 20 2.0% 20 2.8 0.1 1.1 Yes 65 10 5.0
B1 B1 0.19 0.37 75 5.0% 6.7 55 0.5% 15 1.1 0.9 7.6 Yes 130 11 7.6
B2 B2 0.27 0.76 40 3.5% 2.5 125 0.5% 20 1.4 1.5 4.0 Yes 165 11 5.0
B3 B3 0.14 0.95 30 2.0% 1.2 100 0.5% 20 1.4 1.2 2.4 Yes 130 11 5.0
C1 C1 0.06 0.48 45 6.0% 4.2 55 0.5% 15 1.1 0.9 5.0 Yes 100 11 5.0
C2 C2 0.14 0.95 30 2.0% 1.2 100 0.5% 20 1.4 1.2 2.4 Yes 130 11 5.0
D1 D1 0.11 0.49 15 5.0% 2.5 135 0.5% 15 1.1 2.1 4.6 Yes 150 11 5.0
D2 D2 0.06 0.25 50 3.5% 7.2 35 2.0% 15 2.1 0.3 7.5 Yes 85 10 7.5
E1 E1 0.06 0.41 15 5.5% 2.7 130 2.2% 15 2.2 1.0 3.7 Yes 145 11 5.0
S1 S1 0.04 0.62 30 2.5% 3.5 100 4.7% 20 4.3 0.4 3.9 Yes 130 11 5.0
ON1 ON1 0.06 0.58 20 5.0% 2.5 60 0.5% 20 1.4 0.7 3.2 Yes 80 10 5.0
Notes:
(1) C=Cx*Cf
(2)ti = [1.87(1.1-CxCf)L1/2]/S1/3, S= slope in %, L=length of overland flow (300' max)
(3)V=CvS0.5, S=watercourse slope in ft/ft, UDFCD Equation RO-4
(4)tt=L/(V*60 sec/min)
(5)tc check (for urban or developed areas only) = total length/180 + 10
(6)min tc = 5 min
Proposed Basins
Travel/Channelized Time of Flow (tt)
ti+tt
tc Check for Urbanized Basins
Final tc
(6)
Existing Basins
Travel/Channelized Time of Flow (tt)
ti+tt
tc Check for Urbanized Basins
Final tc
(6)
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
100-YEAR TIME OF CONCENTRATION
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
Basin Design Pt. Area
C(1) Length Slope ti
(2) Length Slope Cv Velocity (3) tt
(4) Check tc? Total Length tc
(5)
acres ft % min ft % fps min min Urban? ft min min
EX1 EX1 0.64 0.44 130 4.0% 8.6 95 1.6% 20
2.5 0.6 9.2 Yes 225 11 9.2
EX2 EX2 0.55 0.40 115 3.3% 9.1 145 0.5% 15 1.1 2.3 11.4 Yes 260 11 11.4
Basin Design Pt. Area
C(1) Length Slope ti
(2) Length Slope Cv Velocity (3) tt
(4) Check tc? Total Length tc
(5)
acres ft % min ft % fps min min Urban? ft min min
A1 A1 0.02 1.00 60 4.0% 0.9 10 5.5% 20
4.7 0.0 0.9 Yes 70 10 5.0
A2 A2 0.03 0.75 25 5.0% 1.9 105 4.0% 15 3.0 0.6 2.5 Yes 130 11 5.0
A3 A3 0.01 1.00 45 6.0% 0.7 20 2.0% 20 2.8 0.1 0.8 Yes 65 10 5.0
B1 B1 0.19 0.46 75 5.0% 5.9 55 0.5% 15 1.1 0.9 6.8 Yes 130 11 6.8
B2 B2 0.27 0.96 40 3.5% 1.1 125 0.5% 20 1.4 1.5 2.6 Yes 165 11 5.0
B3 B3 0.14 1.00 30 2.0% 0.8 100 0.5% 20 1.4 1.2 2.0 Yes 130 11 5.0
C1 C1 0.06 0.60 45 6.0% 3.4 55 0.5% 15 1.1 0.9 4.2 Yes 100 11 5.0
C2 C2 0.14 1.00 30 2.0% 0.8 100 0.5% 20 1.4 1.2 2.0 Yes 130 11 5.0
D1 D1 0.11 0.61 15 5.0% 2.0 135 0.5% 15 1.1 2.1 4.1 Yes 150 11 5.0
D2 D2 0.06 0.31 50 3.5% 6.6 35 2.0% 15 2.1 0.3 6.9 Yes 85 10 6.9
E1 E1 0.06 0.51 15 5.5% 2.3 130 2.2% 15 2.2 1.0 3.3 Yes 145 11 5.0
S1 S1 0.04 0.78 30 2.5% 2.4 100 4.7% 20 4.3 0.4 2.7 Yes 130 11 5.0
ON1 ON1 0.06 0.72 20 5.0% 1.8 60 0.5% 20 1.4 0.7 2.5 Yes 80 10 5.0
Notes:
(1) C=Cx*Cf
(2)ti = [1.87(1.1-CxCf)L1/2]/S1/3, S= slope in %, L=length of overland flow (300' max)
(3)V=CvS0.5, S=watercourse slope in ft/ft, UDFCD Equation RO-4
(4)tt=L/(V*60 sec/min)
(5)tc check (for urban or developed areas only) = total length/180 + 10
(6)min tc = 5 min
Proposed Basins
Travel/Channelized Time of Flow (tt)
ti+tt
tc Check for Urbanized Basins
Final tc
(6)
Existing Basins
Travel/Channelized Time of Flow (tt)
ti+tt
tc Check for Urbanized Basins
Final tc
(6)
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
RATIONAL METHOD PEAK RUNOFF
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
Basin Design Pt. Area 2-Year 100-Year
acre tc tc C2 C100 I2 I100 Q2 Q100
min min in/hr in/hr cfs cfs
EX1 EX1 0.64 10 9 0.35 0.44 2.21 8.03 0.50 2.29
EX2 EX2 0.55 11 11 0.32 0.40 2.13 7.42 0.38 1.64
0.88 3.93
Basin Design Pt. Area 2-Year 100-Year
acre tc tc C2 C100 I2 I100 Q2 Q100
min min in/hr in/hr cfs cfs
A1 A1 0.02 5 5 0.95 1.00 2.85 9.95 0.05 0.19
A2 A2 0.03 5 5 0.60 0.75 2.85 9.95 0.05 0.24
A3 A3 0.01 5 5 0.95 1.00 2.85 9.95 0.03 0.12
B1 B1 0.19 8 7 0.37 0.46 2.40 8.80 0.17 0.76
B2 B2 0.27 5 5 0.76 0.96 2.85 9.95 0.59 2.55
B3 B3 0.14 5 5 0.95 1.00 2.85 9.95 0.39 1.42
C1 C1 0.06 5 5 0.48 0.60 2.85 9.95 0.08 0.33
C2 C2 0.14 5 5 0.95 1.00 2.85 9.95 0.38 1.41
D1 D1 0.11 5 5 0.49 0.61 2.85 9.95 0.15 0.66
D2 D2 0.06 7 7 0.25 0.31 2.52 8.80 0.04 0.17
E1 E1 0.06 5 5 0.41 0.51 2.85 9.95 0.07 0.31
S1 S1 0.04 5 5 0.62 0.78 2.85 9.95 0.07 0.31
ON1 ON1 0.06 5 5 0.58 0.72 2.85 9.95 0.10 0.43
2.17 8.92
Existing Basins
Totals
Totals
Peak Discharge
Proposed Basins
Runoff Coefficients Rainfall Intensity Peak Discharge
RunoffIntensity Coefficients Rainfall
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
APPENDIX B
HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS
LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
Basin Proposed
Impervious Area
LID Treatment Area Treated % of Site Treated
(sf) (acres) (sf) (%)
A1 764 Underground Water Quality 764 3%
A2 635 Underground Water Quality 635 2%
A3 473 Underground Water Quality 473 2%
B1 1,376 Bioretention 1,376 5%
B2 7,804 Bioretention 7,804 29%
B3 5,591 Bioretention 5,591 21%
C1 748 Underground Water Quality 748 3%
C2 5,560 Underground Water Quality 5,560 21%
D1 1,511 None - 0%
D2 55 None - 0%
E1 590 None - 0%
S1 860 Bioretention 860 3%
ON1 1,145 Offsite Infiltration System 1,145 4%
Total Site 27,111 24,956 92%
Low Impact Development (LID) Treated Areas
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
WATER QUALITY
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
Required Onsite Water Quality Capture Volume
Basin Area Area Imperviousness Watershed WQCV
(sf) (acres) (%) (inches) (cf)
A-Total (1) 2,767 0.064 68% 0.21 49
B-Total (2) 26,175 0.601 56% 0.18 392
C-Total 8,613 0.198 73% 0.29 250
D-Total 7,492 0.172 21% 0.12 89
E1 2,636 0.061 22% 0.13 33
Less Basins D and E that are free released from site 122
Total WQ Required 691
(1) Water quality provided by underground detention and based on 12-hour storage
(2) Water quality provided by bioretention and based on 12-hour storage based
(3) Basins C and D free release from the site
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
DETENTION POND VOLUME (FAA Method)
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
POND ID: Pond A (Underground Water Quality)
WQ Basin Characateristics
Area = 11,380 square feet
Area = 0.26 acres
C 2 = 0.81
Q in = 0.60 cfs
WQ Release Rate Determined from Number of Chambers and Chamber Release Rate
Q OUT = 0.16 cfs
Unit Flow = 0.60 cfs/acre
T C = 0.0 minutes
Notes:
1. Release rate out of pond based on number of chambers multiplied by release rate per chamber.
2. Rainfall intensities approximated as one-half the 2-yr peak runoff rate.
3. C2 utilized for water quality event detention calculation.
4. Pond is designed to provide WQ for all "A" and "C" Basins.
Detention Volume Calculations
Rainfall Rainfall Inflow Rate Inflow Volume Adjustment
Factor
Average Outflow Volume Required
Duration (T) Intensity (I) Qin= ∑C100*Area*I Vi=(Qin*T*60) Factor Outflow Rate Vo=Qav*T *60 Storage Volume
m= 0.5(1 + Tc/T) Qav = m*Qout Vs=Vi-Vo
min in/hr cfs ft 3 cfs ft 3 ft 3
5 1.425 0.3 90 0.50 0.08 24 66
10 1.105 0.2 140 0.50 0.08 47 92
15 0.935 0.2 177 0.50 0.08 71 106
20 0.805 0.2 203 0.50 0.08 94 109
25 0.715 0.2 226 0.50 0.08 118 108
30 0.650 0.1 246 0.50 0.08 142 105
35 0.585 0.1 259 0.50 0.08 165 94
40 0.535 0.1 270 0.50 0.08 189 82
45 0.495 0.1 281 0.50 0.08 212 69
50 0.460 0.1 291 0.50 0.08 236 55
55 0.435 0.1 302 0.50 0.08 259 43
60 0.410 0.1 311 0.50 0.08 283 28
65 0.385 0.1 316 0.50 0.08 307 10
70 0.365 0.1 323 0.50 0.08 330 -7
75 0.345 0.1 327 0.50 0.08 354 -27
80 0.330 0.1 333 0.50 0.08 377 -44
85 0.315 0.1 338 0.50 0.08 401 -63
90 0.305 0.1 347 0.50 0.08 425 -78
95 0.290 0.1 348 0.50 0.08 448 -100
100 0.280 0.1 354 0.50 0.08 472 -118
105 0.270 0.1 358 0.50 0.08 495 -137
110 0.260 0.1 361 0.50 0.08 519 -158
115 0.255 0.1 370 0.50 0.08 542 -172
120 0.245 0.1 371 0.50 0.08 566 -195
Required Water Quality Volume
V 100 = 109 cubic feet
V 100 = 0.00 acre-ft
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
DETENTION POND VOLUME (FAA Method)
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
POND ID: Pond A (Underground Water Quality)
100 Year Storm Into Detention Facility
Area = 2,767 square feet
Area = 0.06 acres
C 100 = 0.87
Release Rate Out of Pond
Q OUT = 0.55 cfs
Unit Flow = 8.66 cfs/acre
Notes:
1. Release Rate controlled by 100-year historic flow rates from site to Prospect Avenue and includes 0.1 cfs from Pond C1.
2. Area analyzed Includes Basins A1-A3.
3. Pond is designed to provide WQ for all "A" and "C" Basins
Detention Volume Calculations
Rainfall Rainfall Inflow Rate Inflow Volume Adjustment
Factor
Average Outflow Volume Required
Duration (T) Intensity (I) Qin= ∑C100*Area*I Vi=(Qin*T*60) Factor Outflow Rate Vo=Qav*T *60 Storage Volume
m= 0.5(1 + Tc/T) Qav = m*Qout Vs=Vi-Vo
min in/hr cfs ft 3 cfs ft 3 ft 3
5 9.95 0.6 165 1.00 0.55 165 0
10 7.72 0.4 257 1.00 0.55 330 -73
15 6.52 0.4 325 1.00 0.55 495 -170
20 5.60 0.3 372 1.00 0.55 660 -288
25 4.98 0.3 414 1.00 0.55 825 -411
30 4.52 0.3 451 1.00 0.55 990 -539
35 4.08 0.2 475 1.00 0.55 1,155 -680
40 3.74 0.2 497 1.00 0.55 1,320 -823
45 3.46 0.2 518 1.00 0.55 1,485 -967
50 3.23 0.2 537 1.00 0.55 1,650 -1,113
55 3.03 0.2 554 1.00 0.55 1,815 -1,261
60 2.86 0.2 570 1.00 0.55 1,980 -1,410
70 2.59 0.1 603 1.00 0.55 2,310 -1,707
80 2.38 0.1 633 1.00 0.55 2,640 -2,007
90 2.21 0.1 661 1.00 0.55 2,970 -2,309
100 2.06 0.1 685 1.00 0.55 3,300 -2,615
110 1.94 0.1 709 1.00 0.55 3,630 -2,921
120 1.84 0.1 734 1.00 0.55 3,960 -3,226
Required Detention Volume
V 100 = 0 cubic feet
V 100 = 0.00 acre-ft
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
DETENTION POND VOLUME (FAA Method)
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
POND ID: Pond B
100 Year Storm Into Detention Facility
Area = 49,279 square feet
Area = 1.13 acres
C 100 = 0.84
Release Rate Out of Pond
Q OUT = 0.93 cfs
Unit Flow = 0.82 cfs/acre
Notes:
1. Release Rate includes 0.3 cfs from the The Slab property per the Northern Report plus 0.63 cfs from onsite, limiting the total site flows entering Prospect to the 100-year historic
value.
2. Pond area includes 0.49 acres from the The Slab property per the Northern Report in addition to onsite Basins B1-B3 and S1.
Detention Volume Calculations
Rainfall Rainfall Inflow Rate Inflow Volume Adjustment
Factor
Average Outflow Volume Required
Duration (T) Intensity (I) Qin= ∑C
100*Area*I Vi
=(Qin*T*60) Factor Outflow Rate V
o=Qav
*T *60 Storage Volume
m= 0.5(1 + Tc/T) Q
av = m*Qout
Vs=V
i-Vo
min in/hr cfs ft
3 cfs ft
3
ft
3
5 9.95 9.4 2,832 0.50 0.47 140 2,693
10 7.72 7.3 4,395 1.00 0.93 558 3,837
15 6.52 6.2 5,568 1.00 0.93 837 4,731
20 5.60 5.3 6,377 1.00 0.93 1,116 5,261
25 4.98 4.7 7,088 1.00 0.93 1,395 5,693
30 4.52 4.3 7,720 1.00 0.93 1,674 6,046
35 4.08 3.9 8,130 1.00 0.93 1,953 6,177
40 3.74 3.5 8,517 1.00 0.93 2,232 6,285
45 3.46 3.3 8,865 1.00 0.93 2,511 6,354
50 3.23 3.1 9,195 1.00 0.93 2,790 6,405
55 3.03 2.9 9,488 1.00 0.93 3,069 6,419
60 2.86 2.7 9,770 1.00 0.93 3,348 6,422
70 2.59 2.5 10,322 1.00 0.93 3,906 6,416
80 2.38 2.3 10,840 1.00 0.93 4,464 6,376
90 2.21 2.1 11,324 1.00 0.93 5,022 6,302
100 2.06 2.0 11,728 1.00 0.93 5,580 6,148
110 1.94 1.8 12,150 1.00 0.93 6,138 6,012
120 1.84 1.7 12,571 1.00 0.93 6,696 5,875
Required Detention Volume
V 100 = 6,422 cubic feet
V 100 = 0.15 acre-ft
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
DETENTION POND VOLUME (FAA Method)
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
POND ID: Pond C
100 Year Storm Into Detention Facility
Area = 8,613 square feet
Area = 0.20 acres
C 100 = 0.89
Release Rate Out of Pond
Q OUT = 0.28 cfs
Unit Flow = 1.42 cfs/acre
Notes:
1. Pond area includes onsite Basins C1 and C2.
Detention Volume Calculations
Rainfall Rainfall Inflow Rate Inflow Volume Adjustment
Factor
Average Outflow Volume Required
Duration (T) Intensity (I) Qin= ∑C
100*Area*I Vi
=(Qin*T*60) Factor Outflow Rate V
o=Qav
*T *60 Storage Volume
m= 0.5(1 + Tc/T) Q
av = m*Qout
Vs=V
i-Vo
min in/hr cfs ft
3 cfs ft
3
ft
3
5 9.95 1.7 523 0.50 0.14 42 481
10 7.72 1.4 812 1.00 0.28 168 644
15 6.52 1.1 1,028 1.00 0.28 252 776
20 5.60 1.0 1,178 1.00 0.28 336 842
25 4.98 0.9 1,309 1.00 0.28 420 889
30 4.52 0.8 1,426 1.00 0.28 504 922
35 4.08 0.7 1,502 1.00 0.28 588 914
40 3.74 0.7 1,573 1.00 0.28 672 901
45 3.46 0.6 1,637 1.00 0.28 756 881
50 3.23 0.6 1,698 1.00 0.28 840 858
55 3.03 0.5 1,752 1.00 0.28 924 828
60 2.86 0.5 1,805 1.00 0.28 1,008 797
70 2.59 0.5 1,907 1.00 0.28 1,176 731
80 2.38 0.4 2,002 1.00 0.28 1,344 658
90 2.21 0.4 2,092 1.00 0.28 1,512 580
100 2.06 0.4 2,166 1.00 0.28 1,680 486
110 1.94 0.3 2,244 1.00 0.28 1,848 396
120 1.84 0.3 2,322 1.00 0.28 2,016 306
Required Detention Volume
V 100 = 922 cubic feet
V 100 = 0.02 acre-ft
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
UNDERGROUND DETENTION & WATER QUALITY
Apex-Haven Apartments, Fort Collins, CO
Pond A - Underground WQ Volume
Chamber Total Required Detention/ Chamber Chamber Unit Chamber *Installed Min. Min. Min. Req'd Design No. of Provided Provided Total
ID Detention/WQ WQ Type Release Rate
c
Unit Chamber Unit No. of WQ Isolator Row Control
i
Chambers WQ Isolator Installed
Volume
a
Inflow
b
Volume
d
Volume inc. Chambers
f
Release Volume by Provided Release Row System
Aggregate
e
Rate
g
FAA Method
h
Rate
j
Volume
k
Volume
l
(cf) (cfs) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (ea) (cfs) (cf) (cfs) (cf) (cf)
Pond A (WQ/LID) 299 0.45 SC-310 0.016 14.70 31.00 10 0.16 109 WQCV 10 0.16 147 310
*Volume assumes minimum aggregate depth below chamber.
a. Total required WQCV calculated per 12-hr drain time.
b. WQ inflow is approximated as one-half the 2-yr peak runoff rate.
c. Release rate per chamber, limited by flow through geotextile with accumulated sediment.
d. Volume within chamber only, not accounting for void spaces in surrounding aggregate. The Isolator Row(s) are sized per this unit volume.
e. Volume includes chamber and void spaces (40%) in surrounding aggregate, per chamber unit. The total system WQCV is sized per this unit volume.
f. Number of chambers required to provide full WQCV within total installed system, including aggregate.
g. Release rate per chamber times number of chambers. This is used at the 'outlet control' for the FAA calculations.
h. Minimum 'chamber-only' volume to ensure dirty water is fully contained within Isolator Row.
i. Determines whether the design is controlled by the Isolator Row volume or WQCV.
j. Release rate per chamber times number of chambers provided. This is the approximate controlled discharge from the WQ event.
k. Volume provided in chambers only (no aggregate storage). This number must meet or exceed the required FAA storage volume.
l. System volume includes total number of chambers, plus surrounding aggregate. This number must meet or exceed the required 12-hr WQCV.
m. Underground facility is designed to provide WQ for all "A" and "C" Basins
Date: 3/2/2020 P:\U19031 - Haven Apartments\Reports\Drainage\Calculations\U19031-Drain Calcs-Revised Site
APPENDIX C
REFERENCED MATERIALS
+=8;6@-=0;!
$5=0;7-=3?0!&86953-7.0",-;3-7.0!$9953.-=387
4OY^!TL!7TWY!4TQQOSX!DGYKW!BYOQOYOKX!6SMOSKKWOSM
+0.=387!$#!’723700;")@70;!(718;6-=387
6SMOSKKW!<GRK############################################>NTSK###########################
@YWKKY!!3JJWKXX#############################################################################
4OY^##########################################@YGYK########################EOUF############
=\SKW!<GRK##############################################>NTSK###########################
@YWKKY!!3JJWKXX#############################################################################
4OY^##########################################@YGYK########################EOUF############
+0.=387!&#!$5=0;7-=3?0!&86953-7.0",-;3-7.0!(718;6-=387
+0.=387!%#!*;898<0/!*;840.=!(718;6-=387
9KMGQ!JKXIWOUYOTS!GSJ’TW!GJJWKXX!TL!UWTUKWY^F#################FFFFFFF###########################
>WTPKIY!<GRK############################################FFFFFFF###########################
>WTPKIY’3UUQOIGYOTS!<ZRHKW!LWTR!5K[KQTURKSY!?K[OK\!"O&K&!75>)*+,-.#FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
5KXIWOUYOTS!TL!>WTPKIY#####################################FFFFFFF###########################
FFFFFFFFFFFF############################################FFFFFFF###########################
6]OXYOSM!BXK!"/41/6!;91#1!!!!!WKXOJKSYOGQ!!!!!STS%WKXOJKSYOGQ!!!!!RO]KJ%ZXK!!!!![GIGSY!MWTZSJ
>WTUTXKJ!BXK!"/41/6!;91#1!!!!!WKXOJKSYOGQ!!!!!STS%WKXOJKSYOGQ!!!!!RO]KJ%ZXK!!!!!TYNKWFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
8L!STS%WKXOJKSYOGQ!TW!RO]KJ!ZXK$!JKXIWOHK!OS!JKYGOQ#############FFFFFFF###########################
FFFFFFFFFFFF############################################FFFFFFF###########################
FFFFFFFFFFFF############################################FFFFFFF###########################
@YGYK!YNK!WKVZOWKRKSY!LWTR!\NOIN!GQYKWSGYO[K!ITRUQOGSIK’[GWOGSIK!OX!XTZMNY&!">QKGXK!OSIQZJK!
GUUQOIGHQK!5WGOSGMK!4WOYKWOG!;GSZGQ![TQZRK$!INGUYKW!GSJ!XKIYOTS&#!
DNGY!NGWJXNOU!UWK[KSYX!YNOX!XOYK!LWTR!RKKYOSM!YNK!WKVZOWKRKSY2
DNGY!GQYKWSGYO[K!OX!UWTUTXKJ!LTW!YNK!XOYK2
’??./4!>1<.=.?1!>411?!52!91/1>>.=B
’??./4!>1<.=.?1!>411?!52!91/1>>.=B
Kevin Brazelton 970-530-4044
1501 Academy Court Suite 203
Fort Collins CO 80525
Maxiimo Development Group (Attn: Christian Bachelet) 970-566-2948
706 South College Avenue, Suite 207
Fort Collins CO 80524
Haven Apartments
Lot 2 of the Slab Property Subdivision
The restoration of two existing on-site single-family residences and the
construction of a new 14,000 sf footprint apartment building.
Chapter 6 (Detention), Section 1.1 Master Plan Requirements, Typical Release Rates
See attached.
See attached.
Wxsvq{exiv#Zevmergi#Viuyiwx#
Lezir#Etevxqirxw#
Jsvx#Gsppmrw/#GS#
[lex#levhwlmt#tvizirxw#xlmw#wmxi#jvsq#qiixmrk#xli#viuymviqirxC#
The Old Town Master Drainage Basin requires that detention release rates be limited to the 2-year historic
event. The east residence has a historical designation which limits drainage solutions adjacent to the
building (i.e. a standard open detention pond adjacent to the building will not be allowed). Due to the lack
of public storm sewer adjacent to the site and that the location of the existing detention pond is uphill from
the eastern residence, Basins C1 and C2 of the site cannot be detained and the release from these basins
exceed the 2-year historic event. Therefore, limiting the site release rate to the 2-year historic event will
not be feasible.
[lex#epxivrexmzi#mw#tvstswih#jsv#xli#wmxiC#
The development is proposing to limit the release rate from the site to the 100-year historic condition. To
do so, the development will expand the existing detention pond and over-detain flows intercepted by the
pond to the extent feasible. Additionally, the development will provide a small underground detention pond
south of the existing eastern residence to provide water quality and detention for as much site area as
feasible. Together, the site will hold the total release to Prospect Avenue to the 100-year historic event.
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Larimer County
Area, Colorado
Haven Apartments
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
September 4, 2019
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
4490680 4490700 4490720 4490740 4490760 4490780 4490800 4490820 4490840
4490680 4490700 4490720 4490740 4490760 4490780 4490800 4490820 4490840
492340 492360 492380 492400 492420 492440 492460
492340 492360 492380 492400 492420 492440 492460
40° 34' 6'' N
105° 5' 25'' W
40° 34' 6'' N
105° 5' 20'' W
40° 34' 0'' N
105° 5' 25'' W
40° 34' 0'' N
105° 5' 20'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84
0 40 80 160 240
Feet
0 10 20 40 60
Meters
Map Scale: 1:865 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
3 Altvan-Satanta loams, 0 to 3
percent slopes
3.1 100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 3.1 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
Larimer County Area, Colorado
3—Altvan-Satanta loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: jpw2
Elevation: 5,200 to 6,200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F
Frost-free period: 135 to 150 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Altvan and similar soils: 45 percent
Satanta and similar soils: 30 percent
Minor components: 25 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Altvan
Setting
Landform: Benches, terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Mixed alluvium
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 10 inches: loam
H2 - 10 to 18 inches: clay loam, loam, sandy clay loam
H2 - 10 to 18 inches: loam, fine sandy loam, silt loam
H2 - 10 to 18 inches: gravelly sand, gravelly coarse sand, coarse sand
H3 - 18 to 30 inches:
H3 - 18 to 30 inches:
H3 - 18 to 30 inches:
H4 - 30 to 60 inches:
H4 - 30 to 60 inches:
H4 - 30 to 60 inches:
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 10 percent
Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 13.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Satanta
Setting
Landform: Terraces, structural benches
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Mixed alluvium and/or eolian deposits
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 9 inches: loam
H2 - 9 to 18 inches: loam, clay loam, sandy clay loam
H2 - 9 to 18 inches: loam, clay loam, fine sandy loam
H2 - 9 to 18 inches:
H3 - 18 to 60 inches:
H3 - 18 to 60 inches:
H3 - 18 to 60 inches:
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 10 percent
Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 27.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3c
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Nunn
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Larim
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Stoneham
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
This unofficial copy was downloaded on Aug-01-2019 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com
For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA
APPENDIX D
DRAINAGE EXHIBITS
N89°22'14"W 491.32' (M)
S89°22'14"E 212.50' (M)
S00°37'46"W (M)
227.20'
S00°00'00"E (R)
W
S
E
W PROSPECT RD
EXISTING
RESIDENCE
EXISTING
RESIDENCE
EXISTING
BUILDING
EXISTING
PARKING LOT
EXISTING
GRAVEL
EX1
0.64 0.35
0.44
EX2
0.55 0.32
0.40
EXISTING
IMPROVEMENTS
RELATED TO "THE SLAB"
PROPERTY ARE NOT
CONSIDERED IN
HISTORIC CONDITION
PATH:
0' 30' 60'
SCALE: 1" = 30'
15'
P:\U19031 - HAVEN APARTMENTS\CADD\ET\2019-10-10_EX DRAINAGE EXHIBIT.DWG DRAWING NAME: 2019-10-10_EX DRAINAGE EXHIBIT SHEET SIZE: 11 x 17
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
HISTORIC DRAINAGE EXHIBIT
DATE: March 2, 2020 PREPARED FOR: MAXIIIMO DEVELOPMENT GROUP JOB NUMBER: U19031 NOTE: THIS EXHIBIT WAS PREPARED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THEM.
1501 ACADEMY COURT, SUITE 203 FORT COLLINS, CO 80524
(970) 530-4044 WWW.UNITEDCIVIL.COM
SHEET 1 OF 1
UNITED CIVIL
Design Group LLC
NORTH
DRAINAGE SUMMARY
Basin
Area
%I C2 C
100
Q2 Q
100
(acre) (cfs) (cfs)
Existing Basins
EX1 0.64 15.9% 0.35 0.44 0.50 2.29
EX2 0.55 11.6% 0.32 0.40 0.38 1.64
TOTAL 1.19 13.9%
E
262.50'
S00°37'46"W (M)
227.20'
S00°00'00"E (R)
A1
0.02 0.95
1.00
A2
0.03 0.60
0.75
A3
0.01 0.95
1.00
C1
0.06 0.48
0.60
D2
0.06 0.25
0.31
B1
0.19 0.37
0.46
B2
0.27 0.76
0.96
E1
0.06 0.41
0.51
ON1
0.06 0.58
0.72
S1
0.04 0.62
0.78
D1
0.11 0.48
0.60
WEST PROSPECT ROAD
(RIGHT-OF-WAY VARIES)
EXISTING
RESIDENCE
(BUILDING 2)
EXISTING
RESIDENCE
(BUILDING 3)
PROPOSED
APARTMENTS
(BUILDING 1)
EXISTING APEX
BUILDING
BIORETENTION
POND
POND B
POND A
UNDERGROUND
WATER QUALITY
C2
0.14 0.95
1.00
1
B3
0.14 0.95
1.00
DETENTION
POND
POND C
EXISTING
PARKING LOT
POND B OUTLET PIPE
POND OUTLET PIPE
FOREBAY
POND OUTLET
STRUCTURE
POND OUTLET
STRUCTURE
ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM
MAXIIIMO DEVELOPMENT GROUP 3/4/2020
U19031
1" = 20'
1" = N/A
APEX-HAVEN APARTMENTS
NORTH
3/2/2020 9:49:29 AM
P:\U19031 - HAVEN APARTMENTS\CADD\CP\C5.00 - DRAINAGE PLAN.DWG
C5.00 - DRAINAGE PLAN
KRB CDB
C5.00
8
DRAINAGE PLAN
0 20' 40'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
10'
PREPARED FOR:
JOB NUMBER
SHEET NUMBER
OF SHEETS
DATE SUBMITTED:
The engineer preparing these plans will not be responsible
for, or liable for, unauthorized changes to or uses of these
plans. All changes to the plans must be in writing and
must be approved by the preparer of these plans.
NO. BY DATE
CAUTION
REVISIONS:
VERTICAL:
HORIZONTAL:
SCALE
PRELIMINARY
PLANS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
1501 Academy Ct.
Ste. 203
Fort Collins, CO 80524
(970) 530-4044
www.unitedcivil.com
Civil Engineering &
Consulting
PROJ. MGR:
DRAWING NAME:
PATH:
DATE: TIME: DESIGNER:
UNITED CIVIL
Design Group LLC
CHECKED BY:
CHECKED BY:
CHECKED BY:
CHECKED BY:
CHECKED BY:
APPROVED:
8
X.XX
XX.X X.XX
X BASIN DESIGNATION
BASIN AREA (ACRE)
2 - YR RUNOFF COEFF.
100 - YR RUNOFF COEFF.
DESIGN POINT
FLOW DIRECTION
DP
D1
LEGEND
DRAINAGE SUMMARY
Basin Design Point
Area
%I C2 C
100
Q2 Q
100
(acre) (cfs) (cfs)
Existing Basins
EX1 EX1 0.64 15.9% 0.35 0.44 0.50 2.29
EX2 EX2 0.55 11.6% 0.32 0.40 0.38 1.64
TOTAL 1.19 13.9%
Proposed Basins
A1 A1 0.02 90% 0.95 1.00 0.05 0.19
A2 A2 0.03 46% 0.60 0.75 0.05 0.24
A3 A3 0.01 90% 0.95 1.00 0.03 0.12
B1 B1 0.19 17% 0.37 0.46 0.17 0.76
B2 B2 0.27 67% 0.76 0.96 0.59 2.55
B3 B3 0.14 90% 0.95 1.00 0.39 1.42
C1 C1 0.06 31% 0.48 0.60 0.08 0.33
C2 C2 0.14 90% 0.95 1.00 0.38 1.41
D1 D1 0.11 32% 0.49 0.61 0.15 0.66
D2 D2 0.06 2% 0.25 0.31 0.04 0.17
E1 E1 0.06 22% 0.41 0.51 0.07 0.31
S1 S1 0.04 49% 0.62 0.78 0.07 0.31
ON1 ON1 0.06 44% 0.58 0.72 0.10 0.43
TOTAL 1.19 52.1%
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Larimer County Area, Colorado
Survey Area Data: Version 13, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 11, 2018—Aug
12, 2018
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
10