HomeMy WebLinkAboutBAUDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION REMODEL ADVISORY REVIEW - 36 92 - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MEETING MINUTES
August 3, 1992
Council Liaison: Gerry Horak
Staff Liaison: Tom Peterson
The regular meeting continued from July 27, 1992, of the Planning and Zoning board began at
6:35 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins,
Colorado. Board members present included Chairman Bernie Strom, Vice -Chairman Lloyd
Walker, Joe Carroll, Jim Klataske, Laurie O'Dell, and Jan Cottier. Rene Clements -Cooney was
absent.
Staff members present included Planning Director Tom Peterson, Assistant City Attorney John
Duval, Sherry Albertson -Clark, Ted Shepard, Kerrie Ashbeck, Mike Herzig, Patti Schneeberger,
and Eric Bracke.
Mr. Peterson presented the Consent Agenda which consisted of: Item 1 - Minutes of the
June 22 and 29, 1992 meetings; Item 2 - Bauder School - Advisory Review, Case #36-92;
Item 3 - Resolution PZ92-8 - Vacation of Utility Easement; and Item 4 - Resolution PZ92-10
- Vacation of an Access and Utility Easement.
Mr. Peterson presented the Discussion Agenda which consisted of: Item 5 - Referral by the
Planning Director of an Administrative Change to Park Central PUD, Tract C; Item 6 -
College Park PUD - Preliminary, Case #2-87G; Item 7 - Hill Pond East Subdivision -
Preliminary, Case #35-92; and Item 8 - Timberline Court Apartments PUD - Preliminary,
Case #32-83D.
Member Carroll moved to approve Consent Agenda Items 1-4. Member O'Dell seconded
the motion. The motion for approval passed 6-0.
Member Cottier wished that the Board reconsider the approval of 1216 Maple Street Multi -
Family Use Request - Site Plan Review. She stated the reason for reconsideration would be to
add a restriction of the number of occupants per unit to two.
Member Cottier moved to reconsider 1216 Maple Street Multi -Family Use Request - Site
Plan Review. Member Walker seconded the motion.
Member Cottier stated that her concern was that primarily in the event the property might revert
to private ownership at some point that there be a safeguard placed against having four families
occupy the small units. She felt that the Board should insure that the impact of the project is
as minimal as possible. Therefore, she proposed to approve the project as discussed previously
with the added condition that the number of occupants per unit be limited to two.