HomeMy WebLinkAboutBAUDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION REMODEL ADVISORY REVIEW - 36 92 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSCommr y Planning and Environmental rvices
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
June 19, 1992
George Brelig
RBB
P. O. Box 251
Fort Collins, CO 80522 =
Dear George:
City staff has reviewed the Bauder School Advisory Review for
proposed additions and has the following comments to make.
1. Public Service Company requests that additional gas load
information be provided to PSCO.
2. Maintenance of any landscaping in the public right-of-way will _
be by the school district.
3. The drive around access must be maintained as exists for fire
access. Entrance points from the east and west drives and
parking lot must be provided and should be noted on the site
plan.
4. All existing utility services and any proposed changes to the
services, including all appropriate detail drawings, should -be
shown on a utility plan.
5. No drainage report or grading plan was submitted. The
requirements for drainage and erosion control reports and
plans are elaborated in the Stormwater, Design Criteria _
document. Since this is an advisory review, 'submittal should
follow the procedure for final submittal.
6. This site drains to the stormwater detention pond known as the
Fairbrook Pond at the corner of Prospect and Shields. This
facility is master planned to handle flows from developed
lands in the drainage area including Bauder School; however,
the increase in impervious surface on the site and resulting
runoff should be compared to existing conditions. A drainage
report must verify that planned improvements at the school do
not adversely impact the detention pond nor the drainage
facilities between it and the school site (eg. culvert under.
Hampshire Road and channel to the Fairbrook Pond).
7. Erosion control at the site during construction needs to be
addressed.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-67�0
8. A drainage report for the Prospect Road improvements is
available, including storm sewer improvements. Please obtain
the report to evaluate impacts ,of the proposed development on
planned stormwater facilities.
9. Ramps should be added to the walks in the vicinity of the new
sidewalk and parking area (NE area of building) and at the new
sidewalk near the NW corner of the building. An option is to
construct new walks at existing asphalt grade.
10. Clarification is needed whether there is any bike/pedestrian
access being planned to the site, other than from the street.
11. Additional information is needed on the site plan:
a. Area and intended use of the various additions;
b. Existing area of school;
C. Total area of additions;
d. vicinity map.
12. Is there a potential for replacement of the existing barbed
wire fence along the west property line with other fencing?
13. Will there be any existing landscaping removed, or new
landscaping added?
Revised plans and documents addressing the above comments must be
submitted to my office on the following schedule:
Wednesday, July. 1, 1992
Monday, July 20, 1992
Five sets of all
revised plans and documents
Ten folded sets of the site
plan, landscape plan and
elevations, 8-1/2 inch PMT
and colored rendering of
the site or landscape plan
Please call me if you have any questions regarding these comments,
or if you would like to meet to discuss our comments.
Sincerely,
Sherry Albefison-Clark, AICP
Chief Plann
cc Ron Daggett, Poudre R-1 District
Kerrie Ashbeck, Engineering
Kevin McBride, Stormwater Utility