HomeMy WebLinkAboutGUARDIAN SELF STORAGE - PDP190020 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6689
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
January 17, 2020
Ken Merritt
JR Engineering
2900 S College Ave Suite 3D
Fort Collins, CO 80525
RE: Guardian Self Storage, PDP190020, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of Guardian Self Storage. If you have questions about any
comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your
Development Review Coordinator, Tenae Beane via phone at 970-224-6119 or via email
at tbeane@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/02/2020
BY HEARING: Landscape Plan
- Section 3.2.1. Add shade/ornamental trees at College frontage, north property
edge, Fossil Creek Pkwy frontage, south edge (see redlines).
Response to Comment: Trees have been relocated into the planting strip between the
curb and walk along College & Fossil Creek. Exact location of each tree will be
determined after pot holing the strip to determine exact location of utilities. Trees will be
adjusted as needed.
- replace turf along South and east frontage areas with full shrub, ground cover
and tree planting zone between sidewalk and building foundation (see redlines).
Response to Comment: Drought tolerant turf is shown in these strips to match adjacent
properties.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/03/2020
BY HEARING: Site Plan
2
Section 3.2.2 (K) - Parking:
- Vehicular parking based on 900 sf office space (min. 1/1000 sf, max. 3/1000
sf = 3 max.; 1/employee (1 space) = 4 spaces total. 3.2.2 (2) (a) since College
Ave and Fossil Creek Pkwy. do not have on-street parking, the maximum
parking allowed can be increased by 20% or one additional space - total of 5
spaces max. Please show 5 spaces, not six.
Response to Comment: Guardian Storage will employ 1 full-time and 1 part-time staff
allowing for 1 additional space per employee and 6 spaces total. Land use data has been
revised on the cover sheet.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/03/2020
BY HEARING: Section 3.2.5 - Trash and Recycling Enclosures
- Please show location at lower level (south facade of Bldg.) and upper level
(north facade) for trash and recycling enclosures and how accessed form drive
isles.
- Include details to show compliance with requirements.
Response to Comment: Trash and recycling will be on the interior of the building.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/03/2020
BY HEARING: Section 3.5.1 - Building and Project Compatibility
- Developments in or adjacent to existing developed areas shall be compatible
with the established architectural character of such areas by using a design that
is complementary. In areas where the existing architectural character is not
definitively established or is not consistent with the purposes of this Code, the
architecture of new development shall set an enhanced standard of quality for
future projects or redevelopment in the area. Compatibility shall be achieved
through techniques such as the repetition of roof lines, the use of similar
proportions in building mass and outdoor spaces, similar relationships to the
street, similar window and door patterns and/or the use of building materials
that have color shades and textures similar to those existing in the immediate
area of the proposed infill development.
Please show context of existing commercial development to north and south
along College frontage, and neighborhood to east for building height and
design compatibility. Design articulation of building should include a step
down/step back on east facade beginning at second level.
- Buildings shall either be similar in size and height, or, if larger, be articulated
and subdivided into massing that is proportional to the mass and scale of other
structures, if any, on the same block face, abutting or adjacent to the subject
property, opposing block face or cater-corner block face at the nearest
intersection.
See comment above and redlines.
- 3.5.1 (G) - Building Height Review. Review Standards. If any building or
structure is proposed to be greater than forty (40) feet in height above grade,
3
the building or structure must meet the following special review criteria:
Please summarize the key conclusions of the shadow analysis, and steps to be
taken to comply with the review standards.
Address privacy impacts on adjacent property. - NA
Buildings or structures greater than forty (40) feet in height shall be compatible
with the scale of the neighborhoods in which they are situated in terms of
relative height, height to mass, length to mass and building or structure scale to
human scale.
Such height limits can be either increased or decreased by the decision maker
in the development review process for the following purposes:1.preserving the
character of existing residential neighborhoods.
See comment above and redlines for compliance with this standard. As
mentioned, compliance will include building step backs, roof projections, facade
articulation using materials and finishes to reflect commercial office uses, false
window treatments etc. Windows shall be individually defined with detail
elements such as frames, sills and lintels, and placed to visually establish and
define the building stories and establish human scale and proportion -
applicable for false window design as well.
Building design shall contribute to the uniqueness of a zone district, and/or the
Fort Collins community with predominant materials, elements, features, color
range and activity areas tailored specifically to the site and its context. A
standardized prototype design shall be modified as necessary to comply with
the requirements of this subsection.
While the project signs are reviewed separately, project compatibility should
include a pallet of earth tone colors, not bright corporate stripes (blue band) or
blue storage doors, see redlines.
(J) Operational/Physical compatibility. Conditions may be imposed upon the
approval of development applications to ensure that new development will be
compatible with existing neighborhoods and uses. Such conditions may include:
hours of operation and deliveries, placement of trash receptacles, light intensity
and hours of full illumination.
Add site plan notes, and in DA to cover this.
Response to Comment: The proposed new design of the structure plays off of the
existing commercial texture of the neighborhood by using established building materials,
façade elements, glazing areas, and color palettes. The Guardian Storage Fort Collins
building incorporates Split Faced CMU block around the lower floor(s) to create the heavy
pedestal which is found in surrounding commercial buildings. Stacked limestone has
been added to the South west/east corners (same as the shopping complex to the north
of the site) to break up the mass of the CMU block and add warmth to the building.
Similar to other surrounding commercial structures we have added architectural bands
which help define the levels of the building but also create the shadow lines which
4
articulate the pushing and pulling of the façade plains. Awnings, cornices, friezes, and
solar shading devices have been added as well to help relate to the human scale of the
neighborhood.
Windows were added along the south façade to break up the mass and add lightness,
along with changes to the rhythm and patterning of the metal siding which help create a
more human/pedestrian scale. The color palette plays along with the organic earth
tones and matches with the overall surrounding commercial building color scheme. The
outward appearance of the structure has been redesigned to fit in as more of an office or
corporate building then a storage facility. Also, the east façade has been stepped back
as the 2nd floor level to reduce the height impact on the surrounding residential area.
The design has incorporated stepping of the building footprint to break up the perceived
façade masses, different architectural bandings, articulations of the façade plains, and
use of materials/color to make the overall scale of the building fit into the surrounding
context. We have also used the slope and grade of the site to try to decrease the height
impact of the structure along S. College Ave and Fossil Creek Parkway.
The exterior Blue roll up doors along the southside are located on the lowest floor of the
building and flank each side of the inset covered loading bay (the inset loading bay also
helps decrease light fall-off and noise from affecting neighbors). These blue doors add
interest and a splash of color to the heavy masonry base of the building. The north
façade is not visible by any residential and the exterior blue roll up doors help add color
and interest to the base level on this building face as well.
The overall palette of the building consists of brown masonry, stacked limestone, dark
bronze, light brown, silver, medium grey hues, metallic copper, and anodized aluminum
with clear glazing. The blue band adds in a bold strong color that gives the building
facades a punctuation and is an interesting contract to the more organic/earth-toned
palette of the rest of the design.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/03/2020
BY HEARING: Section 3.5.3 (C) (2) (d) Build-to line.
- College frontage (10-25 feet) plan shows 17' from ROW
- Fossil Creek Pkwy. and Snead Drive (15 feet max. Plan shows 16', but an
exception is allowed for applying the existing contextual setback for increased
landscaping area. The build-to line on Snead Drive is 10', in compliance with
standard.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/03/2020
BY HEARING: Section 3.10 - TOD Overlay Zone Standards.
- (A) Enclosed Mini-storage . Ground-floor enclosed mini-storage shall be
prohibited. Enclosed mini-storage shall be allowed either below grade or on
upper levels of a building.
A request for modification of standard is included in submittal and staff
determined it to be complete.
- (C) Off-street Parking . Off-street parking shall be located behind, above,
within or below street-facing buildings to the maximum extent feasible. No
parking will be allowed between the street and the front or side of a building.
Please provide a request for modification of standard for this requirement,
since the parking lot is located between the front building entrance and street
5
(Fossil Creek Blvd.).
- 3.10.5 - Character and Image
(A) Articulation . Exterior building walls shall be subdivided and proportioned to
human scale, using projections, overhangs and recesses in order to add
architectural interest and variety and avoid the effect of a single, massive wall
with no relation to human size.
See comment above, redlines, and photos of project examples for building
design changes.
- (2)Buildings shall have a base portion consisting of one (1) or two (2) stories.
The base portion shall be clearly defined by a prominent, projecting cornice or
roof, fenestration, different material and different color from the remainder of the
building. If the base portion is two (2) stories, the ground floor shall be further
differentiated by fenestration and other detailing.
See redlines.
- (3)Buildings greater than two (2) stories in height shall also be designed so
that upper portions of the building are stepped back from the base. The
adequacy of upper floor step-backs shall be determined by the extent to which
they advance the following objectives:(a)providing pedestrian scale along
sidewalks and outdoor spaces;(b)enhancing compatibility with the scale and
massing of nearby buildings;(c)preserving key sunshine patterns in adjacent
spaces; and(d)preserving views.
Provide upper level stepback of south elevation - see redline.
Response to Comment: See request for modification of standard. See Architectural
response to comment 4 above.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
BY HEARING: Site Plan.
- Need detail of retaining wall at front drop-off area. the wall should incorporate
similar masonry materials as building facade, and include a ornamental metal
fence or solid wood fence to screen parking area.
Response to Comment: 4’ tall Wireworks screen fence added to retaining wall to screen
parking area.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Morgan Stroud, 970-416-4344, mstroud@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: For Hearing:
There are some details in the variance request for Snead that need to be
changed and more details added. Please see my redlines for more information.
Response to Comment: Addressed per recommendation.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: For Hearing:
It is unclear from the soils report that was submitted about what the soil
6
conditions are near the Snead Drive right-of-way. Could you provide information
about the condition of the soils near the right-of-way?
Response to Comment: Additional soil bores and report have been provided.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: For Hearing:
Please submit a Subsurface Water Investigation report for the Snead Drive
right-of-way with the next round of submittal. The requirements for this report can
be found in LCUASS 5.6.2, here is a link to Chapter 5 of LCUASS
(https://www.larimer.org/sites/default/files/ch05_2007.pdf )
Response to Comment: Additional soil bores and report have been provided.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: For Hearing:
A letter of intent will be needed from the owners to the north where asphalt work
is being proposed on their lots.
Response to Comment: design has been altered to keep all asphalt work on the guardian
property.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: For Hearing:
Please see my redlines for more/minor comments.
Response to Comment: See response to redlines.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/08/2020
01/08/2020: For Information:
There is a repayment will be due for the construction of Fossil Creek Parkway,
the final number can be determined once plans and quantities are finalized.
Response to Comment: Noted
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/02/2020
01/02/2020: FOR INFORMATION
The traffic information that was submitted has been received and reviewed.
The conclusions identified in the study (primarily that an eastbound left turn lane
is not required at the Fossil Creek / Snead intersection) are accepted.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/02/2020
01/02/2020: FOR FINAL
Please plan to remove the striping related to the existing left turn lane from
Fossil Creek into the access that will be closed. This removal should be shown
on the plans.
Response to Comment: Stripe removal now shown on Demo Plan.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/02/2020
01/02/2020: FOR FINAL
It would be helpful for the plans to show the location of the existing signal pole at
the College / Fossil Creek intersection. That pole may well need to move
7
(preferably into the pork chop island) in the future when the ultimate
improvement is built.
Response to Comment: Pole shown and labeled on site plan.
Department: Erosion Control
Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-222-1801, bhamdan@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/02/2020
01/02/2020:
INFORMATION ONLY:
The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft. and/or meets the criteria for
a need for Erosion and Sediment Control Materials to be submitted.
The erosion control requirements are located in the Stormwater Design
Criteria in Chapter 2 Section 6.0 a copy of the requirements can be
found at www.fcgov.com/erosion
Response to Comment: Noted
For FINAL
Please submit an Erosion Control Plans to meet City Criteria.
Response to Comment: Erosion control Plans will be submitted at final.
FOR FINAL:
Please submit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation based
upon the accepted Erosion Control Plans to meet City Criteria.
Response to Comment: Escrow to be provided at final.
FOR FINAL: Thank you for submitting an ESC plan at PDP level. The plan is
acceptable for this development review stage. At Final please provide an ESC
report and a cost estimate and a calculation for total disturbed area by this
project. Also at Final, please update the plan to add more specific ESC notes.
A note should be added specifying that the sand filter will be build at the end of
the construction sequence in order to prevent that facility from being
contaminated with sediment during site construction activities. Other notes
specific to this site should also be added as needed.
Response to Comment: Noted
Department: Floodplain
Contact: Claudia Quezada, (970)416-2494, cquezada@fcgov.com
Topic: Floodplain
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
A portion of this property will be located in the City-regulated, 100-year Fossil
Creek floodway and floodplain and must comply with the safety regulations of
Chapter 10 of City Municipal Code.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
8
Please include the following notes on the site plan and drainage/grading plan:
1. “The Developer shall obtain a Floodplain Use Permit from the City of Fort
Collins and pay all applicable floodplain use permit fees prior to commencing
any construction activity (building of structures, grading, fill, detention ponds,
bike paths, parking lots, utilities, landscaped areas, flood control channels, etc.)
within the Fossil Creek floodplain limits¬¬. Storage of equipment and materials
(temporary or permanent) is not allowed in the floodway. All activities within the
floodplain are subject to the requirements of Chapter 10 of the Fort Collins
Municipal Code.”
2. “Construction of new structures, hard surface paths, walkways, driveways,
walls, and parking areas is prohibited in the floodway unless no-rise conditions
are met, per section 10-45 of City Code. Any construction activities in the
regulatory floodway must also include a no-rise certification prepared by a
Professional Engineer licensed in Colorado.”
3. “An approved FEMA Elevation Certificate completed by a licensed surveyor
or civil engineer showing that the building is constructed to the required
elevation is required post-construction prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (CO)
being issued.” Please note: If any part of the building is within the floodplain
boundary then the entire structure is considered in the floodplain and the entire
building envelope must meet the requirements of elevating to the RFPE.
4. “Elevators must meet FEMA Technical Bulletin 4-93 requirements.”
5. “Any items in the floodway that can float such as bike racks, picnic tables,
etc. must be anchored.”
Response to Comment: Notes added per recommendation.
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
If no-rise conditions are met, construction of commercial structures is allowed in
the floodway provided the structures meet all requirements of Chapter 10
including elevating (Section 10-37) or floodproofing (Section 10-38) the lowest
floor of the building, and all duct work, heating, ventilation, AC, electrical
systems, fire suppression systems, etc. to the Regulatory Flood Protection
Elevation (RFPE). The RFPE is the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) plus an
additional amount for safety (18-inches for commercial structures). BFE =
4944.8ft, therefore RFPE= 4946.3 ft.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR INFORMATION:
Development review checklists and permit application forms for floodplain
requirements can be obtained at
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/what-we-do/stormwater/flooding/forms-document
s. Please utilize checklist (see redlines) when preparing plans for resubmittal.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please show the boundaries of the floodplain and floodway per the 2019 Fossil
Creek Trail LOMR on plat, site, utilities, and drainage/grading plans, and
drainage report (pg. 22 and 133). Cross-section and BFE lines should also be
9
shown on drainage/grading plans or on a separate Floodplain Sheet if it’s too
cluttered. Contact Beck Anderson of Stormwater Master Planning at
banderson@fcgov.com for floodplain CAD line work.
Response to Comment: Floodplain & floodway boundaries added to plans. Floodplain
plan with cross-sections added.
Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please contact Claudia Quezada (970.416.2494) with any questions about
these comments or to schedule a meeting to discuss requirements for
development in the floodplain in detail.
Response to Comment: Noted
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Matt Simpson, (970)416-2754, masimpson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please show the location of the sand filter overflow on the plans (Grading or
Drainage plan). In the event there are stormwater overflows (including Snead
Drive and Tract A), where will the water leave the site? Show this flow path on
the Drainage Plan. Confirm that the properties and homes to the east of the
site protected from surface flows. Surface flows leaving this site need to be
discharged into the ROW and not onto private property.
Response to Comment: Addressed per recommendation
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Drainage Report – Please provide street capacity calculations for Fossil Creek
Parkway and confirm that the allowable street capacity (spread and depth) is
not exceeded. Since this project will close off the existing access road and flow
path, stormwater flows will stay on Fossil Creek Parkway. The design and
drainage report need to document where these flows will go and confirm that the
allowable street capacity is not exceeded. Street encroachment criteria can be
found in Ch 9, section 2.1 of the FCSCM.
Response to Comment: Addressed
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please provide more information and detail about Fossil Creek Parkway flow
path at Snead Drive intersection. If the Fossil Creek Pkwy flows are to turn
north at Snead Dr., then an intersection detail will be needed, showing how the
roadway will be modified to force street flows north on Snead Dr. If the street
flows are to flow east on Fossil Creek Pkwy, then an intersection detail with a
cross pan will be needed.
Response to Comment: Addressed
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please show the proposed storm pipes on the Landscape plan. The proposed
10
trees on the west side of Snead Drive will likely have numerous conflicts with the
proposed storm drain lines. Please review and confirm that there are 10-feet of
separation (min.) from storm lines to all trees.
Response to Comment: Storm lines now shown on landscape plan. All trees shown
minimum of 10’ from lines.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please check that the proposed storm lines meet the minimum separation
criteria (10-feet) with all adjacent utilities, such as Ex. Water and Ex. gas.
Parallel storm pipes may be closer.
Response to Comment: There is a small section of waterline that is closer than 10’ to the
storm sewer, if needed the water line can be relocated. All other utilities will meet
minimum separation.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please explain and show what is going to happen with the existing irrigation
structure adjacent to College Avenue.
Response to Comment: Existing structure to be removed and pipe plugged. Call out
added to demolition plan.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please provide more detail about the proposed configuration and alignment of
the storm system in Tract A.
Response to Comment: Pipe alignment and linestyle has been revised to clarify storm
configuration in tract A.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
There is a conflict with the existing gas line and proposed storm line on the north
side of the site and in Snead Drive. Will this gas line be relocated?
Response to Comment: The gas line is to be relocated. Call out added to utility plans.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please size the proposed storm drain systems with a pipe hydraulic model.
Response to Comment: Addressed
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please provide a civil plan-and-profile design of the storm drain systems. A
‘preliminary plan’ level of detail is fine – cover and crossing separations are the
main items of interest.
Response to Comment:Addressed
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Drainage Plan/ Drainage Report – Please explain and present how the flow
rates were determined at DP 6, DP 16, DP 17, and OS3.
Response to Comment: See drainage report response to redlines.
11
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Please submit the entire offsite drainage analysis with appendices. I
understand this drainage memo was previously submitted to the City with the
stockpile permit. We would like to review the methods and calculations for the
offsite flows for this development project
Response to Comment: Drainage memo with full appendices provided.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Drainage Report – please check that the time of concentration calculations
were done using the method in the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual.
Response to Comment: Time of concentration method now meets FCSCM.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Drainage Report - Please check the water quality capture volume calculation, I
have questions about the input parameters (see redlined PDF). Also, Fort
Collins requires storage for 120% of the WQCV.
Response to Comment: Input parameters changed per red lines and 120% WQCV
applied for a custom volume.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
For the Sand Filter, provide confirmation that the groundwater levels are a
minimum of twenty-four inches (24”) below the top of the sand filter section.
(Groundwater elevation data must be taken during high groundwater months.)
Response to Comment: See additional boring report.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR FINAL PLAN:
The Sand Filter will need energy dissipation & sediment forebay structures at all
inflow locations.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR FINAL PLAN:
Please add the Fort Collins Sand Filter detail, D-55.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR FINAL PLAN:
Please update the floodplain linework on the plans to the pending LOMR
floodplain/ floodway.
Response to Comment: floodway/floodplain line added to plans from 2019 study.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
12
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
The proposed offsite storm drain improvements north of the site (3 locations),
will require temporary construction easements or agreements with the property
owner(s) for offsite pipe work. Please see redlined plans for more information.
For Hearing – a letter of intent is needed from the property owners.
For Final – the TCEs and/ or necessary agreements will need to be provided.
Response to Comment: Configuration of offsite pipes has been reconfigured to only
involve work on Guardian property or in City ROW.
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR INFORMATION:
Another storm drain option to consider is to route a storm system along the
western property boundary and then easterly in Fossil Creek Parkway. The
offsite flows on the northeast corner of the site could be picked up in this
system. This would reduce the flow rate and pipe size of the system in Snead
Drive.
Response to Comment: This option has been considered but isn’t feasible due to multiple
utility conflicts and increases cost substantially.
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR INFORMATION:
The results of the Beat the Peak analysis are acceptable. Stormwater is
agreeable to the detention variance. Please see drainage report redlines for
cleanup items.
Response to Comment: See drainage report response to redlines.
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
See redlined Utility Plans PDF for minor comments and clarification of written
comments. I encourage you to reach out to me with any questions. I may be
reached at masimpson@fcgov.com or 970-416-2754.
Response to Comment: Noted. See response to redlines.
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
See redlined Drainage Report PDF for minor comments and clarification of
written comments. I encourage you to reach out to me with any questions. I may
be reached at masimpson@fcgov.com or 970-416-2754.
Response to Comment: Noted. See response to redlines.
Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING:
Onsite wetlands (existing or proposed) should be shown on the Utility Plans as
appropriate.
Response to Comment: Proposed wetlands now shown on utility, drainage and grading
plans.
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Matt Simpson, (970)416-2754, masimpson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
13
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR INFORMATION:
This project site is located within the Fort Collins Loveland Water District and
the South Fort Collins Sanitation District for water and sewer service. Please
contact them at (970) 226-3104 for development requirements.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR INFORMATION:
The City water conservation standards for landscape and irrigation will apply.
Information on these requirements can be found at:
http://www.fcgov.com/standards
Response to Comment: Noted
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/08/2020
01/08/2020: AERIAL APPARATUS ACCESS
The proposed site plan does not provide for aerial apparatus access as
defined by the 2018 IFC and local amendments. The intent of the code is to
provide roof access for all portions of the building (on at least one side) and not
only at the SE corner. Please refer to Section D105 of the IFC. Where access
does not meet minimum code requirements, refer to the comment below
regarding Alternative Means & Methods.
01/15/2020: UPDATED COMMENT
To summarize today's staff meeting, achieving aerial access requirements will
require:
> Emergency Access Easement dedication is required on this property's
portion of the private drive.
Response to Comment: Emergency Access Easement dedication now shown on plat.
> No Parking - Fire Lane signs shall be posted on the south side of the private
drive.
Response to Comment: fire lane signs will be added.
> A modification request will need to be submitted to allow the private drive to
be less than the 26' minimum required width for aerial apparatus access.
Response to Comment:noted
> Landscaping will need to allow for unobstructed roof access via a ladder
truck positioned on the private drive. Please consider tree canopy widths which
may further obstruct truck positioning and ladder access.
Response to Comment: See revised landscape plan, all shrubs planted in strip will be less
than 8’ ht. Trees have been eliminated due to storm lines on both sides of planting strip.
> The proposed fire lane on the SE corner of the building shall remain but limits
of the fire lane shall be expanded to account for the turning template provided.
The fire lane shall incorporate the full width of the drive aisle coming into the
site.
Response to Comment: Limits of the fire lane have been expanded per turning exhibit.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/08/2020
01/08/2020: PERIMETER ACCESS
14
An Emergency Access Easement on the north side of building is referenced in
the comment response but I'm not seeing this labeled anywhere on the plat or
plans.
Response to Comment: existing 12’ access easement on northern side of property is now
shown replatted as 12’ Emergency Access, Utility and Drainage easement
01/15/2020: UPDATED COMMENT:
To summarize today's staff meeting, the north side of the building cannot be
fenced so as to meet perimeter fire access requirements.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/08/2020
01/08/2020: STANDPIPE REQUIREMENT
The building height appears to trigger a standpipe system. If so, a fire hydrant is
required within 100' of the sprinkler system's FDC, but currently not shown.
Response to Comment: Hydrant has been added to southeast of parking entrance and
measures 98’ from FDC.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/08/2020
01/08/2020: FIRE HYDRANT REQUIREMENT
The proposed FDC location meets code, however a fire hydrant is required
within 100' of the FDC. Refer to Standpipe comment above.
Response to Comment: Hydrant has been added to southeast of parking entrance and
measures 98’ from FDC.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/08/2020
01/08/2020: ALTERNATIVE MEANS & METHODS
Where project size and scope and/or site constraints conflict with fire code
compliance, the intent of the fire code may be met via alternative means and
methods, as approved by the fire marshal. As per IFC 104.8 & 104.9, the fire
marshal may allow this approach when perimeter access and/or aerial
apparatus access requirements cannot be met on the site plan. A written plan to
meet the intent of the code via alternative means and methods will need to be
submitted to Fire Marshal Jerry Howell for review and approval prior to FDP
approval.
Response to Comment: Noted
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Cody Snowdon, 970-416-2306, csnowdon@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR HEARING:
Please show the extension of primary power from the existing switch cabinet
(northwest corner of Snead Drive and Fossil Creek Parkway) to the proposed
transformer on the Utility Plan to ensure adequate spacing.
Response to Comment: Addressed per recommendation.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR HEARING:
It looks like the existing switch cabinet could be in conflict with the proposed
15
walk along Fossil Creek Parkway. If the existing switch cabinet needs to be
relocated, please show this on the Utility Plans. If any existing electric
infrastructure needs to be relocated or underground as part of this project, it will
be at the expense of the developer and will need to be relocated within Public
Right-of-Way or a dedicated easement. Please coordinate relocations with
Light and Power Engineering.
Response to Comment: Proposed walk along Fossil Creek Pkwy altered to provide
minimum 2’ clear distance from existing switch cabinet.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR HEARING:
Please added the electric routing from the proposed transformer to the
proposed meter location on the Utility Plans to ensure minimum utility spacing is
achieved. A minimum of 10 ft separation is required between water, sewer and
storm water facilities, and a minimum of 3 ft separation is required between
Natural Gas. Please show all electrical routing on the Utility Plans.
Response to Comment: Electrical routing provided.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR HEARING:
Streetlights will need to be installed along Snead Drive. A 40 feet separation
on both sides of the light is required between canopy trees and streetlights. A
15 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between ornamental
trees and streetlights. Please coordinate the light placement with Light &
Power and add streetlight locations to the Utility and Landscape Plan. A link to
the City of Fort Collins street lighting requirements can be found below:
https://www.larimer.org/sites/default/files/ch15_2007.pdf
Response to Comment: Two street lights added. Locations recommended by the City.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR FINAL:
Meter location will need to be coordinated with Light and Power. Please show
proposed meter location on the utility plan. Reference Section 8 of our Electric
Service Standards for electric metering standards. A link has been provided
below.
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStanda
rds_FINAL_18November2016_Amendment.pdf
Response to Comment: Proposed electric meter location added to plans.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR FINAL:
A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one-line diagram for all
commercial meters will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power
Engineering for review prior to Final Plan. A link to the C-1 form is below:
http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1Form.pdf
Response to Comment: To be provided at Final.
16
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR DCP:
Light & Power will require AutoCAD files of the Site Plan, Utility Plans, and
Landscape Plans prior to the Entitlement Process approval.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR INFORMATION:
Service to the building is considered a commercial service; therefore, the
service is required to be installed, owned and maintained by the property
owner.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR INFORMATION:
Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system
modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development.
Please contact me or visit the following website for an estimate of charges and
fees related to this project:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investmen
t-development-fees
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR INFORMATION:
For additional information on our renewal energy programs please visit the
website below or contact John Phelan (jphelan@fcgov.com).
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/go-renewable
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/31/2019
12/31/2019: FOR INFORMATION:
Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge
processes, electric services standards, and fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Response to Comment: Noted
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Kelly Smith, ksmith@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020: The Natural Habitat Buffer Zone needs to be delineated and
labeled on the site, grading, utility, and landscape plan.
Response to Comment: Natural area buffer zone labeled and delineated on plans
17
requested.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020: Please add an Environmental Planner signature to all plans that
show the buffer zone.
Response to Comment: Planner signature added.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020: Please add the following note on all sheets of the site, landscape
and utility plans that show the Habitat Buffer: "The Natural Habitat Buffer Zone is
intended to be maintained in a native landscape. Please see Section 3.4.1 of
the Land Use Code for allowable uses within the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone."
This will help preserve the intention behind the buffer zones and the natural
features into the future.
Response to Comment: Note added
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020: Please add a table to the site plan that includes the following:
- amount of buffer area that would be required by a 50' buffer from the
wetlands
- amount of buffer area provided on these plans
- minimum buffer distance shown
- maximum buffer distance shown
- average buffer distance
Response to Comment: Table added
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020: If any trees will be removed, please add the following note to the
landscape plans:
“If tree removal is necessary, please include the following note on the tree
mitigation plan and/or landscape plan, as appropriate: “NO TREES SHALL BE
REMOVED DURING THE SONGBIRD NESTING SEASON (FEBRUARY 1 TO
JULY 31) WITHOUT FIRST HAVING A PROFESSIONAL ECOLOGIST OR
WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST COMPLETE A NESTING SURVEY TO IDENTIFY ANY
ACTIVE NESTS EXISTING ON THE PROJECT SITE. THE SURVEY SHALL
BE SENT TO THE CITY ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER. IF ACTIVE NESTS
ARE FOUND, THE CITY WILL COORDINATE WITH RELEVANT STATE AND
FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVES TO DETERMINE WHETHER ADDITIONAL
RESTRICTIONS ON TREE REMOVAL AND CONSTRUCTION APPLY.”
Response to Comment: Note added to plans.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020: Please add the following notes to the Landscape Plans;
NATIVE SEED MIX NOTES
1. THE TIME OF YEAR SEEDING IS TO OCCUR SHOULD BE OCTOBER
THROUGH EARLY MAY.
2. PREPARE SOIL AS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE FOR NATIVE
SEED MIX SPECIES THROUGH AERATION AND ADDITION OF
18
AMENDMENTS, THEN SEED IN TWO DIRECTIONS TO DISTRIBUTE SEED
EVENLY OVER ENTIRE AREA. DRILL SEED ALL INDICATED AREAS AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING OPERATIONS.
3. IF CHANGES ARE TO BE MADE TO SEED MIX BASED ON SITE
CONDITIONS THEN APPROVAL MUST BE PROVIDED BY CITY
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER.
4. APPROPRIATE NATIVE SEEDING EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED
(STANDARD TURF SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR AGRICULTURE EQUIPMENT
SHALL NOT BE USED).
5. DRILL SEED APPLICATION RECOMMENDED PER SPECIFIED
APPLICATION RATE TO NO MORE THAN ½ INCH DEPTH. FOR
BROADCAST SEEDING INSTEAD OF DRILL SEEDING METHOD DOUBLE
SPECIFIED APPLICATION RATE. REFER TO NATIVE SEED MIX TABLE
FOR SPECIES, PERCENTAGES AND APPLICATION RATES.
6. PREPARE A WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN TO ENSURE THAT WEEDS
ARE PROPERLY MANAGED BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER SEEDING
ACTIVITIES.
7. AFTER SEEDING THE AREA SHALL BE COVERED WITH CRIMPED
STRAW, JUTE MESH, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE METHODS.
8. WHERE NEEDED, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
UNTIL SEED IS GERMINATED THEN WEEN THE SEED FROM IRRIGATION.
IF IRRIGATION IS USED, THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR SEEDED AREAS
SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIONAL AT THE TIME OF SEEDING AND SHALL
ENSURE 100% HEAD-TO-HEAD COVERAGE OVER ALL SEEDED AREAS.
ALL METHODS AND REQUIREMENTS IN THE APPROVED IRRIGATION
PLAN SHALL BE FOLLOWED.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR SEEDED AREA FOR PROPER
IRRIGATION, EROSION CONTROL, GERMINATION AND RESEEDING AS
NEEDED TO ESTABLISH COVER.
10. THE APPROVED SEED MIX AREA IS INTENDED TO BE MAINTAINED IN
A NATURAL LIKE LANDSCAPE AESTHETIC. IF AND WHEN MOWING
OCCURS IN NATIVE GRASS SEED MIX AREAS DO NOT MOW LOWER
THAN 6 TO 8 INCHES IN HEIGHT TO AVOID INHIBITING NATIVE PLANT
GROWTH.
11. NATIVE SEED AREA WILL BE CONSIDERED ESTABLISHED WHEN
SEVENTY PERCENT VEGETATIVE COVER IS REACHED WITH NO
LARGER THAN ONE FOOT SQUARE BARE SPOTS AND/OR UNTIL
DEEMED ESTABLISHED BY CITY PLANNING SERVICES AND EROSION
CONTROL.
12. THE DEVELOPER AND/OR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATE SEEDLING COVERAGE AND GROWTH
AT THE TIME OF FINAL STABILIZATION, AS DEFINED BY STATE AND
LOCAL AGENCIES. IF FINAL STABILIZATION IS NOT ACHIEVED TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE AGENCY, THE DEVELOPER AND/OR
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADDITIONAL
CORRECTIVE MEASURES TO SATISFY FINAL VEGETATIVE
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSEOUT.
Response to Comment: Notes added.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/09/2020
19
01/09/2020: Please clarify specific turf species proposed and the blend
percentages to ensure the project water budget chart gets adequately
calculated.
Response to Comment: Turf species clarified and water budget chart calculated.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020: Please include the wetland boundary and 50 foot buffer from
proposed wetlands on all plans.
Response to Comment: Per meetings and discussions with the City, a 17’ buffer is shown
on the plans.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020: Please ensure light fixtures have a color temperature of less than
3000k and demonstrate this on the plans.
Response to Comment: Verified
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020: • Language for the Natural Resources section of the
Development Agreement has been provided to Engineering. The following
items must be submitted prior to the issuance of a Development Construction
Permit (but ideally prior to the recording of the Development Agreement):
1. A cost estimate for landscaping in the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone (including
plant material, labor and irrigation)
2. A cost estimate for three years of monitoring and annual reporting of
landscape establishment in the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone
3. A bond, letter of credit, or escrow warranting the landscape installation,
establishment, monitoring, and reporting for the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone
(125% of cost estimates)
4. A weed management plan
5. An annual monitoring and reporting plan
I can provide examples and additional detail for any of these items if needed.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/15/2020
01/15/2020: Trees being removed that are not being mitigated by Forestry will
have to be mitigated for loss habitat value. The environmental Planner will
perform a site visit to determine the quantity and type of vegetation for
mitigation and communicate those requirements post site visit.
Response to Comment: Noted
Department: Forestry
Contact: Nils Saha, nsaha@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR HEARING
Please include a scale on the landscape plan (sheet 5).
Response to Comment: Scale added
20
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR HEARING
The proposed planting list does not meet Forestry’s minimum species diversity
standards. This exists to prevent uniform insect or disease susceptibility and
senescence on a development site. The following minimum standards apply to
any development plan:
Number of trees on site Maximum percentage of any one species
10-19 50%
20-39 33%
40-59 25%
60 or more 15%
There are too many juniper trees proposed for this site. Please incorporate two
additional species for the screening.
Response to Comment: Addressed, see revised plant list.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR HEARING
Per LUC 3.2.1, canopy shade trees should constitute at least 50 percent of all
tree plantings. Ornamental and evergreen tree outnumber proposed shade
trees. Please adjust.
Response to Comment: Addressed, see revised plant list.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR HEARING
Is there a stop sign proposed on Snead Drive? Please note that Traffic
Operations has requested that trees be placed at least 50 feet from stop signs
to prevent clearance issues. Please adjust tree placement accordingly, if
applicable.
Response to Comment: Addressed, see revised planting plan. Trees placed beyond 50’.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR HEARING
Is there a reason as to why there are no trees proposed in the parkway on
Fossil Creek? Forestry would like to see street trees along this stretch. It is our
understanding that there may be some future improvements to Fossil Creek
Parkway, including a right turn lane. However, if the sidewalk is in its ultimate
location, then the street trees can be placed 3-4’ from the edge of the sidewalk.
Response to Comment: Addressed, see revised plant plan – trees placed in planting strip.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR HEARING
Swamp white oak trees are not well suited to Fort Collins’ soil and climate.
Please substitute another species of oak (ex: Shumard, Texas red oak,
chinkapin etc.)
Response to Comment: Addressed, see revised plant list.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR HEARING
The planting area on the north side is a little too narrow. Is it possible to widen it
to at least 5.5’ to better support the trees that are proposed?
Response to Comment: Addressed, see revised planting plan – no trees planted in strip
21
due to storm lines.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR HEARING
During the tree inventory in October, the applicant posed the question about
whether to retain the hybrid cottonwood. Given the proximity of the proposed
sidewalk on College (which would impact the critical root zone) and limited
longevity of the species, forestry would permit the removal of this tree with
mitigation.
Response to Comment: See revised mitigation & planting plan – Cottonwood is shown as
removed and additional trees now planted.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR APPROVAL
There is a tree on Snead that is closer than 4’ to a gas line. Please see redlines
and adjust.
Response to Comment: Trees adjusted for all utilities along Snead.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR APPROVAL
The trees proposed behind the walk on Fossil Creek Parkway need to be at
least 3-7 feet from the edge of the walk. Seven feet is preferable to mitigate
future tree/walk conflicts.
Response to Comment: Trees planted 7’ off of walk where possible.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR APPROVAL
The parkway on S College Ave should be at least 9 feet. Is there a reason as to
why no street trees are proposed along College? Please include street trees
30-40 feet apart.
Response to Comment: Trees now showin in planting strip along S. College.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR FINAL
There are a lot of line over text issues with the plans. Please see redlines.
Response to Comment: Addressed
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING
Please do not include the symbols for trees that are to be removed on the
proposed landscape plan (please see redlines).
Response to Comment: Addressed
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 01/07/2020
01/07/2020: FOR HEARING
The storm drain on Snead Dr. is not shown on the landscape plan. Please
ensure that all existing and proposed utilities are correctly shown on the
landscape plan.
Additionally, there should be 10’ of separation between storm mains and trees.
As proposed, placing street trees along the west side of Snead would be
challenging. Some interior landscaping would be in conflict as well. Please
consider shifting the storm line to ensure that street trees can be placed with
adequate separation.
Response to Comment: Storm line and trees now shown in planting – see revised plan for
trees 10’ off all utility lines.
22
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Katy Hand, khand@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/13/2020
01/13/2020: INFORMATIONAL: Please visit our website for a list of current
adopted building codes and local amendments:
https://www.fcgov.com/building/codes.php
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/13/2020
01/13/2020: FOR BUILDING PERMIT: The building will need to be insulated to
code or other approved energy path method. Contact Brad Smith
brsmith@fcgov.com for additional information on this requirement.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/13/2020
01/13/2020: FOR BUILDING PERMIT: An air tightness test will be required
(0.25 CFM50 /sf of surface area of building envelope). Contact Brad Smith
brsmith@fcgov.com for additional information on this requirement.
Response to Comment: Noted
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/13/2020
01/13/2020: An NFPA13 sprinkler system will be required.
Response to Comment: Noted
Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/13/2020
01/13/2020: If the basement does not meet the building code definition of
basement, the proposed project would be 4 stories and must be of construction
type that allows 4 stories.
Response to Comment: Noted
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: TECH SERVICES ONLY:
The boundary closes.
Response to Comment: Noted
23
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree
with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not
made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response
letter.
Response to Comment: See attached redlines
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/06/2020
01/06/2020: INFORMATION ONLY:
Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be done at
FDP.
Response to Comment: Noted
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Gloria Hice-Idler, 970-381-8629, gloria.hice-idler@state.co.us,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/02/2020
01/02/2020: CDOT has no comment regarding this proposal.
Response to Comment: Noted
Contact: Megan Harrity, Larimer County Assessor, 970-498-7065,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/10/2020
01/10/2020: The ownership in our records for the two parcels for this
preliminary plat are as follows: SCOTT STANLEY
The plat is showing a signature block for: Guardian Storage Fort Collins LLC.
If a deed comes through to change the individual name to the LLC then that is
fine. But right now, we would be looking for a signature from Stanley Scott .
Response to Comment: Noted