Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSupporting Documentation - Response to Comments - 06/11/2025 1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview June 11, 2025 Patrick Mcmeekin MULBERRY DEVELOPMENT LLC 4801 GOODMAN ST Timnath, CO 80547 RE: Bloom Filing Eight, BDR250010, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of Bloom Filing Eight. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator, Brandy Bethurem Harras via phone at 970-416-2744 or via email at bbethuremharras@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Development Review Coordinator Contact: Brandy Bethurem Harras bbethuremharras@fcgov.com 970-416-2744 Topic: General Comment Number: 1 05/22/2025: INFORMATION: I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist you and your team. Please include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you! Response: Noted Thank you! Comment Number: 2 05/22/2025: SUBMITTAL: As part of your submittal, a response to the comments provided in this letter and a response to plan markups is required. The final letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this letter to insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color. Please use the markups to insert responses to each comment on plans. Please do not flatten markup 2 responses. Provide a detailed response for any comment asking a question or requiring an action. Any comment requesting a response or requiring action by you with a response of noted, acknowledged etc. will be considered not addressed. You will need to provide references to specific project plans, pages, reports, or explanations of why comments have not been addressed [when applicable]. Response: Noted Thank you! Comment Number: 3 05/22/2025: SUBMITTAL: Correct file naming is required as part of a complete submittal. Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming Standards found here: https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic-submittal-requiremen ts-and-file-naming-standards_v1_8-1-19.pdf?1703783275 File names should have the corresponding number, followed by the file type prefix, project information, and round number. For example: 1_SITE PLAN_Project Name_FDP_Rd1. A list of numbers and prefixes for each file can be found at the link above. Response: Named as noted. Comment Number: 4 05/22/2025: SUBMITTAL: All plans should be saved as optimized/flattened PDFs to reduce file size and remove layers. Per the Electronic Submittal Requirements AutoCAD SHX attributes need to be removed from the PDF’s. AutoCAD turns drawing text into comments that appear in the PDF plan set, and these must be removed prior to submittal as they can cause issues with the PDF file. The default setting is "1" ("on") in AutoCAD. To change the setting and remove this feature, type "EPDFSHX" (version 2016.1) or “PDFSHX (version 2017 and newer) in the command line and enter "0". Read this article at Autodesk.com for more on this topic: https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/autocad/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarti cles/sfdcarticles/Drawing-text-appears-as-Comments-in-a-PDF-created-by-Aut oCAD.html Response: PDF provided as flattened. Comment Number: 5 05/22/2025: SUBMITTAL: Resubmittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being the cut-off for routing the same week. When you are preparing to resubmit your plans, please notify me with an expected submittal date with as much advanced notice as possible. Response: Noted Thank you! Comment Number: 6 05/22/2025: INFORMATION: Please resubmit within 180 days, approximately 6 months, to avoid the expiration of your project. Response: Noted Thank you! 3 Comment Number: 7 05/22/2025: INFORMATION: ANY project that requires four or more rounds of review would be subject to an additional fee of $3,000.00. Response: Noted Thank you! Comment Number: 8 05/22/2025: NOTICE: A Development Review sign will be posted on the property. This sign will be posted through the final decision and appeal process. A request for the removal of signs will be made by your Development Review Coordinator at the appropriate time. Response: Noted Thank you! Comment Number: 9 05/22/2025: FOR RECORDING – PLAT : Could you please update the City signature blocks on the Plat ? Instead of using "this _______ day of ______A.D., 20____," could you opt for "on this day, ____________" for the date? This alternative format facilitates smoother date input with digital signatures. Please add "or Designee" to the end of each title under the signature line for City signatures. Additionally, kindly ensure there is sufficient space between the signature line and the title line to accommodate the digital signature. Response: Updated as requested. Comment Number: 10 05/22/2025: FOR APPROVAL: The Director shall issue a written decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the development application based on compliance with the standards referenced in Step 8 of the Common Development Review Procedures (Section 6.3.8). The written decision shall be mailed to the applicant, to any person who provided comments during the comment period and to the abutting property owners and shall also be posted on the City's website at fcgov.com/developmentreview/proposals Response: Noted Thank you! Comment Number: 11 05/22/2025: FOR APPROVAL: Once the decision has been finalized by the Director, there is a two-week appeal period from the date of the signed decision. The project is not able to be recorded until it is confirmed there are no appeals. Response: Noted Thank you! Comment Number: 12 05/22/2025: FOR APPROVAL: All "For Final Approval / For Approval" comments need to be addressed and resolved prior to moving forward with the final documents and recording of this project. I will provide a recording checklist and process information when we 4 are closer to this step. Response: Noted Thank you! Department: Planning Services Contact: Kai Kleer kkleer@fcgov.com 970-416-4284 Topic: General Comment Number: 1 06/11/2025: INFORMATION: No comments Response: Noted Thank you! Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sophie Buckingham sbuckingham@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 06/09/2025: FOR APPROVAL: The plat lists two owner entities: Mulberry Development, LLC and Hartford Construction, LLC. According to the Larimer County Assessor, the entire plat area is owned by just one entity, Mulberry Development, LLC. Will Hartford Construction, LLC own one of the parcels at the time the plat is signed? If not, please update the ownership listed on the plat to match the Larimer County Assessor. Response: Both signatures left due to title commitment language. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Steve Gilchrist sgilchrist@fcgov.com 970-224-6175 Topic: General Comment Number: 1 05/29/2025: INFORMATION: Based on the narrative provided this project is just a replat to correct lot line discrepancies. This would not trigger any requirements for a TIS. TIS waived. Traffic Operations has no other comments. Response: Noted Thank you! Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Andrew Crecca acrecca@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 06/05/2025: INFORMATION: No Comment Response: Noted Thank you! 5 Contact: Wes Lamarque wlamarque@fcgov.com 970-416-2418 Topic: General Comment Number: 1 05/29/2025: INFORMATION: No comments. Response: Noted Thank you! Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque wlamarque@fcgov.com 970-416-2418 Topic: General Comment Number: 1 05/29/2025: INFORMATION: No comments. Response: Noted Thank you! Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Clint Anders canders@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 06/09/2025: INFORMATION: Environmental Planning has no comments on the lot line adjustment. Response: Noted Thank you! Department: Forestry Contact: Malesa Plumley mplumley@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 06/09/2025: INFORMATION: Forestry has no comments. Response: Noted Thank you! Department: Park Planning Contact: Missy Nelson mnelson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 06/09/2025: INFORMATION: No comments from Parks O&M or Park Planning and Development. Response: Noted Thank you! 6 Department: PFA Contact: Marcus Glasgow marcus.glasgow@poudre-fire.org 970-416-2869 Topic: General Comment Number: 1 05/29/2025: INFORMATION: PFA has no comments on the lot line adjustment. Response: Noted Thank you! Department: Building Services Contact: Russell Hovland rhovland@fcgov.com 970-416-2341 Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 06/06/2025: INFORMATION: If these new property lines locations will affect existing buildings, contact Building Services to go over fire separation distance requirements. Response: Building Services will be contacted as necessary. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County jcounty@fcgov.com 970-221-6588 Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 06/10/2025: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please make changes as marked in the Technical Services (TS) markup PDF. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the markups, please contact John Von Nieda at 970-221-6565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.com Response: Responses provided on PDF Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Cheryl Smith, Larimer County Assessor, smithcl@co.larimer.co.us Topic: General Comment Number: 1 05/23/2025: INFORMATION / QUESTION: There are no Tax Liens or issues at this time. Currently we are showing Mulberry Development LLC as the owner for both parcels. The Plat is showing a signature block for Hartford Construction LLC - is that correct? Response: Both signatures left due to title commitment language.