HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemorandums - Traffic - 03/11/2025 DELICH ASSOCIATES Traffic& Transportation Engineering ,
2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, Colorado 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 � , r
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Gilchrist/Tyler Stamey, Fort Collins Traffic Operationsr
Shelby Hinchliff, Neenan Archistruction '
Jeff Jensen, Jensen LaPlante Development
FROM: Matt Delich a Pa
DATE: March 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Liberty Common Middle School — Signal Warrant Analysis
(File: 2413ME02)
This memorandum provides a peak hour signal warrant analysis at the Prospect/
Sharp Point intersection. This analysis was requested by Fort Collins Traffic Operations. It
utilized traffic forecasts in the Liberty Common Intermediate Transportation Impact
Study, dated October 2024 and traffic counts contained in the Prospect Sports
Intermediate Transportation Impact Study, dated July 2023.
Recent peak hour traffic counts (7:15-8:15am & 4:15-5:15pm) at the Prospect/
Sharp Point intersection are shown in Figure 1. These are considered to be the
conventional peak hours of the street. Raw traffic counts are provided in Appendix A.
The counts at the Prospect/Sharp Point intersection were obtained in January and May
2023 as part of the Prospect Sports study. The traffic volumes at the Prospect/Sharp
Point intersection were increased at a rate of two percent per year. The short range
(2029) background peak hour traffic at the Prospect/Sharp Point intersection is shown in
Figure 2. The year 2029 coincides with full occupancy of Phase 2 of the Liberty Common
Middle School expansion.
The morning peak hour of Liberty Common school and the morning peak hour of
the Prospect/Sharp Point intersection are the same. In the afternoon however, the
afternoon peak hour of Liberty Common school is earlier than the conventional afternoon
peak hour of the Prospect/Sharp Point intersection. Since peak hour signal warrant
analyses are conducted for the peak hours of a given intersection, trip generation was
calculated for Liberty Common school for the conventional afternoon peak hour of the
Prospect/Sharp Point intersection and is shown in Table 1.
Figure 3 shows the Liberty Common site generated traffic for the conventional
peak hours of the Prospect/Sharp Point intersection. The traffic volumes generated by
the Liberty Common school were added to the background traffic volumes to produce the
total traffic volume forecasts for the short range (2029) future. Figure 4 shows the short
range (2029) total peak hour traffic at the Prospect/Sharp Point intersection.
Using the existing (2023) traffic volumes, the Prospect/Sharp Point stop sign
controlled intersection will meet peak hour signal warrants. The Prospect/Sharp Point
intersection will also meet peak hour signal warrants in the short range (2029) background
and total futures. Peak hour signal warrants are provided in Appendix B. These evaluations
were conducted with one lane on each street. According to the Fort Collins Master Street
Plan, Prospect Road is classified as a four-lane arterial street. With the additional through
lanes on Prospect Road, the peak hour signal warrant will be met. It is acknowledged that
the turning movement traffic counts during the afternoon school dismissal time at the
Prospect/Sharp Point intersection were not obtained. However, based upon the forecasts
in the Liberty Common Intermediate Transportation Impact Study, it is likely that the
peak hour signal warrant would be met at this time period also.
The Prospect/Sharp Point intersection is approximately 1060 feet east of the
Prospect/Prospect Parkway signalized intersection. This distance does not meet City of
Fort Collins signal spacing criteria. Fort Collins traffic operations is considering this signal
due to the connectivity that was created from Drake Road to Prospect Road across the
railroad tracks.
It is concluded that the peak hour signal warrant is met at the Prospect/Sharp Point
intersection with the current counted (2023) traffic and the year 2029 background traffic.
The site generated traffic from the Liberty Common Middle School will add traffic to that
intersection. Do not hesitate to contact me if there are questions or if additional information
is required.
--/f L—DELICH
-71 ASSOCIATES
I&
N
LO cli o 0 7/2
1035/959
103/77
Prospect
17/2 If
724/1002 ►
79/38 0 00
'o
00
N
AM/PM
'o
U) a
RECENT (2023) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC OF
THE STREET (7:15-8:15 AM & 4:15-5:15 PM) Figure 1
I&
N
c �
LO
N0� s/2
Io o —1166/1080
1 � �109/82
Prospect 1
19/2 815/1128 7
I I
89/43 ^0 N 0 N
M -
N �
N
AM/PM
M .o� 0
SHORT RANGE (2029) BACKGROUND
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2
--//LDELICH
-7 ASSOCIATES
TABLE 1
Trip Generation
Code Use Size AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out
Phase 2
522 Middle School 384 2.10 806 0.67 139 0.67 118 0.15 28 0.15 30
students 54% 46% 48% 52%
--/f L—DELICH
-7/ ASSOCIATES
I&
N
10/2
Prospect 87/18
0')N
00
�00
if)
AM/PM
'o
U) a
LIBERTY COMMON PEAK HOUR
SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Figure 3
I&
N
c �
No� s/2
I� I o o —1166/1080
J y � ,—119/84
Prospect 19 1
19/2
815/1128 I I
176/61 M 0 N
� M
M
CL—
� AM/PM
M .o� 0
SHORT RANGE (2029) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 4
--//LDELICH
-7 ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX A
DELICH ASSOCIATES
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND,CO 80538
Phone: 970 669-2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 5/16/2023&1/25/2023 Observer: Vickie
Day: Tuesday&Wednesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
R=right turn Intersection: Prospect/Sharp Point
S=straight
L=left turn
Time Northbound: Sharp Point Southbound: Sharp Point Total Eastbound: Prospect Westbound: Prospect Total Total
Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All
7:00 2 0 22 24 1 0 1 2 26 1 155 22 178 14 233 2 249 427 453
7:15 3 0 32 35 0 0 2 2 37 3 192 18 213 22 282 2 306 519 556
7:30 4 0 28 32 0 0 1 1 33 3 175 14 192 19 251 1 271 463 496
7:45 6 0 25 31 0 0 0 0 31 7 187 30 224 34 277 2 313 537 568
8:00 7 0 26 33 0 0 1 1 34 4 170 17 191 28 225 2 255 446 480
i
15 2 0 32 34 1 0 1 2 36 7 161 25 193 31 182 2 215 408 444
30453 0 28 31 1 0 2 3 34 5 152 18 175 21 175 1 197 372t 406
4 0 21 25 0 0 2 2 1 27 7 155 15 177 18 184 2 204 1 381 408
7:15-8:15 20 0 111 131 0 0 4 4 1 135 17 724 79 820 103 1035 7 1145 1 1965 2100
PHF 0.71 nla 0.87 0.94 nla nla 0.5 0.5 1 0.91 0.61 0.94 0.66 0.92 0.76 0.92 0.88 0.91 1 0.91 0.92
4:00 2 0 26 28 0 0 4 4 32 3 299 15 317 17 229 0 246 563 595
4:15 2 0 28 30 0 0 4 4 34 1 231 6 238 15 244 1 260 498 532
4:30 2 0 27 29 4 0 4 8 37 0 226 8 234 28 275 1 304 538 575
4:45 8 0 23 31 2 0 9 11 42 1 237 10 248 12 229 0 241 489 531
5:00 3 0 30 33 3 0 8 11 44 0 308 14 322 22 211 0 233 555 599
5:15 3 0 19 22 0 0 2 2 24 0 257 7 264 10 166 1 177 441 465
5:30 5 0 29 34 1 0 1 2 36 1 245 9 255 5 191 0 196 451 487
5:45 5 0 18 23 0 1 0 1 1 24 0 180 8 188 18 170 0 188 376 1 400
4:15-5:15 15 0 108 123 9 0 25 34 157 2 1002 38 1042 77 959 2 1038 2080 2237
PHF 0.47 nla 0.9 0.93 1 0.56 1 nla 1 0.69 0.77 0.89 0.5 1 0.81 0.68 0.81 0.69 0.87 0.5 0.85 0.94 0.93
APPENDIX B
x
IL
0
Ib
0
N
CL
a
CL
L O >
r" r" O ro
* * �c)
O
O
w O
z ti
J
H
W
ryLLI
0
W
�Q
W
OW
O x u~i O
p 0 � I a--�
gz � W
� L z
w w N � QO
T N K Z O 1
Y yU c: ca F z
z �w a � � aw
w CD co
w° M a = O
LLI Ear aw
��yy�� N w �° O a 2 f0 U
C'J oa Z l� O = O � O Z
� z Z �o � � -a > Q � —
O O O Q
ZO J m w O � O (0 Z) F-
� 0 ¢ CD
LU —0 CD z
� N ° 0 fm �
= O
N N O J w a) N O a
�/ d o a � 0m - �
U � (n m ; E W
< � o
OW :s � a
rn W2 q? E N CD �
CDF-
O � � W
U °° coz
0 0 � m � w0
° U
w n W
ry
a zM
o
0
Lo
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
CO Lo It coN r-
22
as
�M
M N
Qa
mm
zz
MINOR STREET MORE
CRITICAL APPROACH - VPH
x
IL
M
M
N
2
a
CL
O >
O �
r' O
k # O N
r Q
O
W C)
z
J
H
W
LLI
ry W
O
�a C) Z
0 W Qo W
�C9 O
O W O
0�0 �n W
_ x U) Q Z
L
° U) W cn
N Ki z O (2 1
W Z _ O
�
a� O � U) � = �
W o "=LuLLI� W
W �p
cM O Q U Q
�J U) z <� O = > O —
Z 04
z ¢ �o -D > Q
Z ° W W o o � 0_ (0 C)
� O
Qo 0(IfQ O m � � zZ
N L O
N N a) fn i
� � o a5- o = .�
Q � o
O
� Ow � ; � YQ
rn W = Q 0E ��
M D
O � > m= o rnU
U � ° o �
Loco 0 "o
woCDv ° = w
°' C
Q ? Z
Q
O � �
� O �
O O
O cn
O
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
Co Lo It M 04 r-
2 2
as
0o 0
vv
Qa
co co
zz
MINOR STREET MORE
CRITICAL APPROACH - VPH
x
IL
n
u�
M
N
2
a
x
CL
O >
O M
r' O o
IL * �c:) N
0
r Q
O
W O
z
Q r
J
H
W
ryLLI
O
W L
W
OW
�C9 O
O W� O z
_ �� ) NL Qz
O� � W N 1�►' O
N z O ' 1..�
lt U ° a) c
Q w ww Q
W Z
a� o � � o � �
0 w� M .-. —
� a (1)
a�v[Ifcyi p= wo �x �OZ � o
od co
z O J W N O O O C
~ co
Q o m O � �
zo o = m � a WIZ
Q O
N O W T J
N N O J a) N " Q
~p U) E p �
� o
W I-Z}. �' co
o H -1 a E a ~_
rn HU U) oa) d') U)
2 0 2 N
Uao co > s W
0 °
c.
a � Z0
0
W CL Q �
Q 0M
ry CDF
-
D
O O
LL L
O
0
O O O O O O
0
Co Ln M N r-
2 2
0
M CO
N
Q a
m m
z z
MINOR STREET MORE
CRITICAL APPROACH - VPH
LIBERTY COMMON MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPANSION
INTERMEDIATE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
OCTOBER 2024
Prepared for:
LCS Building Corporation
225 East Monroe Avenue, Suite #4
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Prepared by:
1/'L
�7 if / r�
DELICH ASSOCIATES
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland, CO 80538
Phone: 970-669-2061
FAX: 970-669-5034
Project #2413
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS..........................................................................................2
LandUse......................................................................................................................... 2
Streets.............................................................................................................................2
ExistingTraffic................................................................................................................. 2
ExistingOperation........................................................................................................... 6
Observations of Existing Trafffic Patterns ....................... ........................................... 6
PedestrianFacilities........................................................................................................ 9
BicycleFacilities.............................................................................................................. 9
TransitFacilities ............................................................................................................ 10
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT............................................................................... 11
TripGeneration ............................................................................................................. 11
Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment .................................................................................. 15
Background Traffic Projections ..................................................................................... 15
Total Traffic Projections................................................................................................. 15
SignalWarrants.............................................................................................................23
Geometry ......................................................................................................................23
OperationAnalysis ........................................................................................................ 23
Pedestrian Level of Service...........................................................................................26
Bicycle Level of Service ................................................................................................ 30
Transit Level of Service................................................................................................. 30
IV. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... 31
LIST OF TABLES
1. Current Peak Hour Operation.................................................................................... 8
2. Trip Generation ....................................................................................................... 14
3. Phase 1 Short Range (2026) Background Peak Hour Operation ............................27
4. Phase 2 Short Range (2029) Background Peak Hour Operation ............................27
5. Phase 1 Short Range (2026) Total Peak Hour Operation .......................................28
6. Phase 2 Short Range (2029) Total Peak Hour Operation .......................................28
_//I DELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
7/ rASSOCIATES
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Site Location .............................................................................................................3
2. Existing Intersection Geometry..................................................................................4
3. Recent Peak Hour Traffic..........................................................................................5
4. Averaged/Balanced Recent Peak Hour Traffic.......................................................... 7
5. Phase 1 Site Plan.................................................................................................... 12
6. Phase 2 Site Plan.................................................................................................... 13
7. Trip Distribution ....................................................................................................... 16
8. Phase 1 Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ............................................................. 17
9. Phase 2 Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ............................................................. 18
10. Phase 1 Short Range (2026) Background Peak Hour Traffic.................................. 19
11 . Phase 2 Short Range (2029) Background Peak Hour Traffic..................................20
12. Phase 1 Short Range (2026) Total Peak Hour Traffic............................................. 21
13. Phase 2 Short Range (2029) Total Peak Hour Traffic............................................. 22
14. Phase 1 Short Range (2026) Geometry.................................................................. 24
15. Phase 2 Short Range (2029) Geometry..................................................................25
APPENDICES
A. Base Assumptions Form
B. Recent Peak Hour Traffic Counts
C. Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort Collins Motor Vehicle
LOS Standards (Intersections)
D. Phase 1 Short Range (2026) Background Peak Hour Operation
E. Phase 2 Short Range (2029) Background Peak Hour Operation
F. Phase 1 Short Range (2026) Total Peak Hour Operation
G. Phase 2 Short Range (2029) Total Peak Hour Operation
H. Pedestrian/Bicycle Level of Service Worksheets
—/II—DELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-7 1 [—ASSOCIATES
I. INTRODUCTION
This Intermediate Transportation Impact Study (ITIS) addresses the capacity,
geometric, and control requirements for the proposed Liberty Common Middle School
Expansion. The proposed Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site is located in the
buildings at 1845 Sharp Point Drive (Phase 1) and 1901 Sharp Point Drive (Phase 2) in Fort
Collins, Colorado.
During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project
developer (LCS Building Corporation), project planning consultant (Jensen Laplante
Development), the project architect/civil engineering consultant (Neenan Archistruction),
and Fort Collins Traffic Engineering. This study generally conforms to the format set forth
in the Fort Collins ITIS Guidelines in the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards"
(LCUASS). A scoping discussion was held with the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff.
The Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions form and related documents are
provided in Appendix A. The study involved the following steps:
- Collect physical, traffic, and development data;
- Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment;
- Determine peak hour traffic volumes;
- Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections;
- Analyze signal warrants;
- Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of
transportation
THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY IS NOT
SIGNED/STAMPED. THE FINAL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY WILL BE SIGNED/
STAMPED REFLECTING COMMENTS FROM THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS.
—/II—DELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
1 [—ASSOCIATES Page 1
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The location of the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site is shown in
Figure 1 . It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be
presented.
Land Use
Land uses in the area are primarily commercial and industrial. There are
commercial and industrial uses to the north, south, and west of the site. The Bucking
Horse residential neighborhood is approximately 1,700 feet to the south of the site. The
center of Fort Collins lies to the west of the proposed Liberty Common Middle School
Expansion site.
Streets
The primary streets near the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site are
Sharp Point Drive, March Court, Riverbend Court, and Canton Court. Figure 2 shows a
schematic of the existing geometry at the Sharp Point/March, Sharp Point/Building
Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton intersections.
Sharp Point Drive is east of (adjacent to) the proposed Liberty Common Middle
School Expansion site. It is a north-south street classified as a collector street on the Fort
Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Sharp Point Drive has a two-lane cross section
with limited parking on both sides of the street. Sharp Point Drive is 34 feet wide (edge
of asphalt to edge of asphalt). There is no parking allowed on the east side of the street
from the Riverbend parking lot to just south of March Court. At the Sharp Point/March,
Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton
intersections, Sharp Point Drive is set up with all northbound and southbound movements
in a single lane. The posted speed on Sharp Point Drive is 25 mph.
March Court is north of (adjacent to) the proposed Liberty Common Middle School
Expansion site. Riverbend Court is south of(adjacent to) the proposed Phase 1 of Liberty
Common Middle School Expansion site. Canton Court is south of (adjacent to) the
proposed Phase 2 of Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site. March Court,
Riverbend Court, and Canton Court are local streets. March Court is approximately 250
feet long with a cul-de-sac at the west end and 34 feet wide. Riverbend Court is
approximately 350 feet long with a cul-de-sac at the west end and 34 feet wide. Canton
Court is approximately 260 feet long with a cul-de-sac at the west end and 34 feet wide.
Existing Traffic
Recent morning and afternoon school peak hour (7:00-8:00am & 2:30-3:30pm)
traffic volumes at the Sharp Point/March, Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/
Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton intersections are shown in Figure 3. The counts at
—/,'.I DELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
1 [—ASSOCIATES Page 2
I&
N
Prospect
Poudre Trail
Cn
Liberty Common
Midpoint 0 March Middle School
5
Ct. Expansion
L
(D Existing Llt i:.
-0 Common E
ESchool
Riverbend
Ct.
Canton
Ct.
A
C'ray
eGRlrycTo
ti
Ho�rH
R9�R0
'90
Drake
SCALE: 1"=1000'
SITE LOCATION Figure 1
_J'f 1-DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
7 1 Page 3
I&
N
sT
OA
at�r
NT
OA
Oo
Gti•
NT
- Denotes Lane
Gti-
N
-o
o�
7�
EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Figure 2
—orlLDELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
-7 1 Page 4
I&
N
at�r G\ pp R
o �
�dGti. 'rn
rn
rn
o
7:00-8:00am/2:30-3:30pm
Ga
N
-o
o�
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3
_—o'/1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
-7 1 Page 5
the Sharp Point/March, Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and
Sharp Point/Canton intersections were obtained in September and October 2024. Raw
traffic data is provided in Appendix B. Since counts were obtained on different days, the
traffic volumes were averaged/balanced and are shown in Figure 4.
Existing Operation
The Sharp Point/March, Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend,
and Sharp Point/Canton intersections were evaluated, and the peak hour operation is
displayed in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. Since school traffic
peaks within a 20-30 minute time period, the calculated peak hour factors for the individual
traffic movements were used in the operational analyses. The Sharp Point/March, Sharp
Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton intersections
are currently operating acceptably with existing control and geometry in the morning and
afternoon school peak hours. The intersections were evaluated using the unsignalized
intersection techniques provided in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 61h Edition. A
description of level of service for unsignalized intersections from the Highway Capacity
Manual (HCM), 6th Edition and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS
Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix C. Acceptable operation is
considered to be at level of service D overall and level of service F for any approach leg at
unsignalized intersections.
Observations of Existing Traffic Patterns
Observations were conducted during the school peak hours for the existing Liberty
Common Elementary School. Liberty Common Elementary School has three drop-
off/pick-up locations. One is in the front of the school in the main parking lot exiting to
Sharp Point Drive via March Court, one is on the south side of the school that is accessed
from March Court and is a one-way access exiting to Midpoint Drive, and the third is
located on the west side of the school that is accessed from a driveway to/from Midpoint
Drive.
During the morning peak hour, there was minor queuing of vehicles on Sharp Point
Drive at the driveway to the main parking lot in front of the school. Many parents would
park their vehicles along both sides of Sharp Point Drive (in allowed areas) and along
March Court and walk their children to the school. Some parents would park in the
Riverbend Trailhead parking lot and walk their children across Sharp Point Drive. There
is a planned rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) crosswalk to be constructed just
north of March Court. This will provide a safe crossing of Sharp Point Drive. The morning
peak hour drop-off period was approximately 20 minutes.
During the afternoon peak hour, vehicles would queue along both sides of Sharp
Point Drive waiting to access the main parking lot in front of the school. Prior to dismissal,
the southbound queue was 20-25 vehicles long. There was also a queue on March Court
(westbound) to access the pick-up area to the south of the school. This queue spilled out
," I DELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
1 [—ASSOCIATES Page 6
I&
N
3scp
GN
O �
Q
IQ
s
�0' `moo
�JWOO
rn
-� 7:00-8:00am/2:30-3:30pm Q'0-
Ga
N
-o
0
7�
AVERAGED/BALANCED
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 4
_—o'/1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
—7 1 Page 7
TABLE 1
Current Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
EB LT/RT C B
Sharp Point/March NB LT A A
(stop sign)
OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT B B
Sharp Point/Building Access NB LT A A
(stop sign)
OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT B B
Sharp Point/Riverbend NB LT A A
(stop sign) OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT B B
Sharp Point/Canton NB LT A A
(stop sign) OVERALL A A
--//LDELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-7/ ASSOCIATES Page 8
to Sharp Point Drive. Parking is prohibited along the west side of Sharp Point Drive
between 2:45-3:15pm so that vehicles can queue when waiting for access to the main
parking lot in front of the school and waiting to turn onto March Court. Along the east side
of Sharp Point Drive, vehicles would queue in the prohibited parking areas, which are
from the entrance to the Riverbend Trailhead parking lot to approximately 500 feet to the
south (March Court). Some parents would park in the Riverbend Trailhead parking lot
with some vehicles not using designated parking stalls. Vehicle were parked on either
side of the access to the Riverbend Trailhead parking lot leaving only enough room for a
single vehicle to use the access. This caused congestion within the Riverbend Trailhead
parking lot. Some vehicles parked along March Court very close to the Sharp Point/March
intersection. The vehicles parked along both sides of Sharp Point Drive south of March
Court. This extended beyond Riverbend Court. Along the west side of Sharp Point Drive,
the vehicles parked close to the Sharp Point/March intersection caused line of sight
issues for vehicles egressing from March Court. In addition to this, the parked/queued
vehicles along both sides of Sharp Point Drive caused significantly narrow travel lanes on
Sharp Point Drive. The narrow travel lanes appeared to cause some driver discomfort.
The afternoon peak hour pick-up period was approximately 25-30 minutes.
Pedestrian Facilities
There are attached sidewalks (4 foot width) adjacent to the west side of Sharp
Point Drive. Along the east side of Sharp Point Drive is the Poudre Trail sidewalk (10 foot
width). There are attached sidewalks (4 foot width) along both sides of March Court,
Riverbend Court, and Canton Court. It was requested that an inventory of all pedestrian
facilities within one mile of the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site be
conducted. There are sidewalks along all streets within a mile of the Liberty Common
Middle School Expansion site, except for a short break in the sidewalk system on the west
side of Sharp Point Drive from the intersection of Midpoint Drive to Canton Court to the
north. This section of sidewalk is also missing on the north side of Midpoint Drive for
approximately 420 feet. In addition to this, there are no sidewalks along Summit View
Drive. The sidewalk system is complete within the Bucking Horse neighborhood to the
south and within the Rigden Farm neighborhood south of Drake Road. Pedestrians can
use the sidewalks along the east side of Nancy Gray Avenue. There is one flashing
beacon pedestrian crosswalk across Drake Road at Illinois Drive. There is access to the
Poudre Trail, the Spring Creek Trail, and the Power Trail. There is also access to the trail
adjacent to Prospect Road, east of Sharp Point Drive. This trail extends to Summit View
Drive.
Bicycle Facilities
There are bicycle lanes along Prospect Road, east of Sharp Point Drive. There
are no bicycle lanes along Prospect Road west of Sharp Point Drive. These bicycle lanes
connect to the Poudre Trail. Sharp Point Drive is a collector street that was constructed
without bicycle lanes prior to the current City of Fort Collins standards. As Sharp Point
Drive transitions into Nancy Gray Avenue to the south, Nancy Gray Avenue has on-street
bicycle lanes.
I DELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
1 [—ASSOCIATES Page 9
Transit Facilities
Currently, this area of Fort Collins is served by Transfort Route 18. Route 18
operates along Prospect Road, Midpoint Drive, and Sharp Point Drive. There is a transit
stop on Sharp Point Drive, just to the north of March Court.
--//LDELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-71 ASSOCIATES Page 10
III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Phase 1 of the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion project is proposed to
occupy the office building at 1845 Sharp Point Drive. The proposed student population
for Phase 1 is 240 students. The site plan for Phase 1 is shown in Figure 5. Also shown
on Figure 5 is the proposed site traffic pattern for the drop-off and pick-up of students. It
is proposed that the Building Access be used for ingress vehicles from the north.
Riverbend Court would be used for ingress vehicles from the south. All ingress vehicles
would proceed to the back of the building for student drop-off/pick-up. The egressing
vehicles from the site will use March Court. Phase 2 of the Liberty Common Middle
School Expansion project is proposed to occupy the office building at 1901 Sharp Point
Drive and construct a gymnasium connecting the two buildings. The proposed student
population for Phase 2 (full occupancy) is 384 students. The site plan for Phase 2 is
shown in Figure 6. Riverbend Court will be vacated with Phase 2 of the Liberty Common
Middle School Expansion so that a gymnasium can be constructed to join the two
buildings. Also shown on Figure 6 is the proposed site traffic pattern for the drop-off and
pick-up of students. It is proposed that the Canton Court be used for all ingress vehicles.
All ingress vehicles would proceed to the back of the building for student drop-off/pick-
up. The egressing vehicles from the site will use March Court.
It is recommended and assumed that the start and dismissal times for the proposed
middle school and the existing elementary school will be staggered by 20 minutes.
Staggering the start and dismissal times will mitigate some of the traffic congestion;
particularly at the Sharp Point/March intersection since all elementary and middle school
traffic will egress using this intersection. The Phase 1 short range analysis year will be
2026 and the Phase 2 short range analysis year will be 2029. Each short range analysis
includes development of the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site and an
appropriate increase in background traffic due to normal growth and other potential
developments in the area.
Trip Generation
Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development on the
existing and proposed street system. Trip Generation, 11t" Edition, ITE was used to
determine the trips that would be generated by the Liberty Common Middle School
Expansion project. A trip is defined as a one-way vehicle movement from origin to
destination. Middle School (Code 522) was used for the land use for the Liberty Common
Middle School Expansion project. However, the ITE trip generation rates in the afternoon
peak hour were deemed too low. Therefore, adjustments to the afternoon peak hour trip
generation were applied. Afternoon peak hour rate from ITE was deemed too small.
Adjustment made by using 0.59 (AM Generator (0.74) minus PM Street (0.15)). Table 2
shows the expected trip generation from the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion
site on a daily and peak hour basis. Phase 1 of the Liberty Common Middle School
Expansion trip generation resulted in 504 daily trip ends, 161 morning peak hour trip ends,
and 142 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Phase 2 of the Liberty Common Middle School
Expansion trip generation resulted in 806 daily trip ends, 257 morning peak hour trip ends,
and 227 afternoon peak hour trip ends.
I DELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
1 [—ASSOCIATES Page 11
I&
N
SCALE: 1"=100'
SHARP PO1f+1'i pR{4>= w _ S'*RP
r - - ^a � l�?r -•� PO4VT0+?Ik%E
wr s e w
r - _ - m -
I w 1-i1
t'
v
swu;tP vplkr _:•r`
'p.RcEL w.ettOlui �� I Q •i
4 1 S U BU T 19rf
IT I t to �� � • �'�� i
CRR UENTocCUPur.Cr:a
C[msT Type.n•e f yyyyyr PI 10i 3 1`011PR
f r PWWLERe Y I,� t PARCELier191Grmb
� rs ] I eu¢r:leaf LEA �
4 I C4rRRENT 94WANEr:e
I f \ I r A111 FU ^•.L_ ,r;TEn.n $CPONIrSTg.rErR0
♦ U
Z
f r •`�• \,lrf'IIY-fXKLf51 '� ry1(f
ww - 'S
'' -�F,�i• .i ws.• !'\� i - _- -. .3"l:t'"Jt_—'i 7� - 1�
PROPOSED JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
1825 Sharp Point \ _ \ _ /•',,3 n. i- �°
SW•Ft.Total: 19.200 Sq,ft.
Parking Spaces=111 spaces(immediately adjacent to school,
for school use,additional parking remains for existing buildings Exlsnkc,FIRE \\ E•\ v, F - *vy$ P
to remain,not included in 111 space count) XroRwT To eeir,vX '\\•\i \.\.\ - it i 3 1 1 ® , la
Enrollment I Staff;
7th and 8th grade students only i \•\ \t\.ti Q� j cwaeisENrvPEcu�JrNcr:a 'I
Enrollment. 239 students -y y SVRWRLERG'N �1�'�
Staff: 20-25 staff
Project Scope: •\ -� -,'�o I \ I ' 33`
A Poudre School District Charter School is considering
purchase of the properly between March Court and Canton ■ \, •\ 11. "
Court southwest of Sharp Point Drive,including the 5 buildings 1- - \ •\ t
indicated here. Ise xEn R ER Elms• \ \'
Project scope to include change of occupancy of 1825 Sharp -
Point from 6 to E occupancy.and tenant finish to accommodate !" cuRRENr occuvakcv E \\•\ I ``-•� ---
classrooms,administralion and support spaces. There are no 1 CONs'°'°E"� T• \ i
site grading or drainage nwdifcalions,no landscape SPRWKLEROs:wa �•
maditlptions,no changes to the facade and no utility "-I'----
---------------
A
moddicatiom as part of this project. ,,,,,,,,,,. w„ ,..,,,,,,, .w,..,,•,..�,�,..�.m..,,�,......,.,r.<r w..r.,..,...,•.,.Y,w,...,,,�
Change of occupancy and renovations of 1825 Sharp Point to
be complete for start or school,Fall 2025. 333'-0"
LEGEND
❑ Area of renovation
❑ Existing buildings to remain
4 Proposed Drop QfE I Pick Up(175'-0",7 vehicles)
i� Proposed Queuing
-•. Property Line
---- Utility Easement
PHASE 1 SITE PLAN Figure 5
_J'f 1-DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
7 1 Page 12
I&
N
SCALE: 1"=100'
�•wG4TE RITE PEluO C-UPT
sops?POINT OftwE � S'YARp
Poilw-
29
p3 _
i _ 9
p Ira 2#
� O e
I .\ .. @ O
I ti
z
\ \ U
r .
AIR
t 8
ENFRY
1IF
- \•\• \•\ T SPIV' ^' (A.��,.
PROPOSED JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL \o.�—Ts I49
1825-1901 Sharp Point+gym+link
Sq.Ft.Total' 55,330 Sq.tit.. Pa aP-0Pr.Dui ` �' Y•.•'J-. tit
Parking Spaces=241 spaces(not Including parking along `•, '. ...,��- ,f•
Sharp Paird Drive) ,�,?IearlRe •,\ ,•�. •!�{ F '•v� V $
RMMART TO R£11wIR ' '
Enrollment7Stelf: �'• � I PMcex.:nmresem I �' �� +
7th and 8tr grade students only •\r 'ti I o�ca•e
Enrollment 384 students "•� Iy� - f I au+rti�riiaccw..Rcr:e 1� i
Staff 30-35 staff
Project Scope: i -,28\''� ..;�y _�.,� .I Pi�ew.e• J CA I .
A Poudre School District Charter School is considering
purchase of the property between March Court and Canton
Court southwest of Sharp Pont Drive.including the 5 buildings , \ - \ 1\i' I I• '�0�-'1
indicated here. +----
Project scope to include change of occupancy of 1825 SharpIN,
PM69..t+126rOS0a'/
Point and 1901 Sharp Point from B to E occupancy. Renovation
of both 1825 and 1901 Sharp Poonl to accommodate classroom, r eue.r.+see •\,. { _ v i• } i
CYlllaa{POC{YPANCY:L 1^r
administration and support spaces. Gonslcuction of an addition I cansr PIS va
'clinking'1825 and 1901 to Include a gymnasium,cafetena and
r SPnlrk"relm:v
flex space.
P°°0E-�se••s
Timing of completion of Master Plan is TBD ............................. ter... •_.-,.,r....,�..•„.,..,.•.,..,ti.... �.�e.,,....a,l...,i
LEGEND
333'0•
Area of renovation
® Area of addition
Existing buildings to remain
I Proposed access I fire lane
�!t ! Proposed Drop Off Pick Up(175'-0'.7 vehicles)
4 Proposed Oueuirg
.... Property Line
---- Utility Easement
PHASE 2 SITE PLAN Figure 6
_J'f 1-DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
7,1 Page 13
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
Code Use Size
AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out
Phase 1
522 Middle School 240 2.10 504 0.67 87 0.67 74 0.59 65 0.59 77
students 54% 46% 46% 54%
Phase 2
522 Middle School 384 2.10 806 0.67 139 0.67 118 0.59 104 0.59 123
students 54% 46% 46% 54%
--//LDELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-7/ ASSOCIATES Page 14
Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment
Trip distribution for the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site was based
on existing/future travel patterns, land uses in the area, consideration of trip attractions in
Fort Collins, and engineering judgment. Figure 7 shows the trip distribution for the Phase
1 short range (2026) and Phase 2 short range (2029)analysis futures. The trip distribution
was agreed to by City of Fort Collins staff in the scoping discussions.
Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded
on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process.
Figure 8 shows the Phase 1 site generated morning and afternoon peak hour traffic
assignment at the Sharp Point/March, Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/
Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton intersections. Figure 9 shows the Phase 2 site
generated peak hour traffic assignment at the Sharp Point/March and Sharp Point/Canton
intersections. The Sharp Point/Building Driveway intersection is not shown since all site
generated traffic was assumed to be for drop-offs/pick-ups. The Sharp Point/Riverbend
intersection is not shown since Riverbend Court will be vacated with Phase 2 of the Liberty
Common Middle School Expansion.
Background Traffic Projections
Figure 10 shows the Phase 1 short range (2026) background traffic projections at
the Sharp Point/March, Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and
Sharp Point/Canton intersections. The Building Driveway shows no traffic due to the fact
that this building will be unoccupied in preparation of the proposed Liberty Common
Middle School. Figure 11 shows the Phase 2 short range (2029) background traffic
projections at the Sharp Point/March and Sharp Point/Canton intersections. The Sharp
Point/Building Driveway intersection is not shown since all site generated traffic was
assumed to be for drop-offs/pick-ups. The Sharp Point/Riverbend intersection is not shown
since Riverbend Court will be vacated with Phase 2 of the Liberty Common Middle School
Expansion. Some of the existing traffic for the three office buildings to the southwest of the
site was assigned to Canton Court. Background traffic projections for the Phase 1 short
range (2026) and Phase 2 short range (2029)future horizons were obtained by increasing
the through traffic volumes on Sharp Point Drive by approximately two percent per year.
The background traffic growth was agreed to by City of Fort Collins staff in the scoping
discussions.
Total Traffic Projections
Figure 12 shows the Phase 1 short range (2026) total traffic at the Sharp Point/
March, Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton
intersections. Figure 13 shows the Phase 2 short range (2029) total traffic at the Sharp
Point/March and Sharp Point/Canton intersections.
—/II—DELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-7 1 [—ASSOCIATES Page 15
4
Cn
N
0
70%
March
Ct.
Phase 1
Phase 2--
Riverbend
Ct.
Canton
Ct. 3p0/0
0
a,
SCALE: 1"=300'
TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 7
_J'f 1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
7,1 Page 16
I&
N
�s
aiGrG�
10�e at
dGti.
°'o
7:00-8:00am/2:30-3:30pm
r'o
N
-o
o�
o�
PHASE 1 SITE GENERATED
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8
_—o'/1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
77,1 Page 17
I&
N
c9Q1
6�
7:00-8:00am/2:30-3:30pm
G1-
N
-o
o�
7�
PHASE 2 SITE GENERATED
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 9
_—o'/1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
-7 1 Page 18
I&
N
UJ
sue&
�a
O p
O
O 6%
0 �
01
rn
-� 7:00-8:00am/2:30-3:30pm -Q
0
�G�• \11
N
-o
0
7�
PHASE 1 SHORT RANGE (2026)
BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 10
_—o'/1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
-7 1 Page 19
I&
N
�s
1-O
�O S/
�a
o�
C
"AlA
7:00-8:00am/2:30-3:30pm
o�G�
G N
-o
o�
PHASE 2 SHORT RANGE (2029)
BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 11
_—o'/1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
-7 1 Page 20
I&
N
�o
�a
6,o
0
�O
'Q
e�dGti
eta \
c'6,
0
�o
rn
7:00-8:00am/2:30-3:30pm Q,,�s
0
�G�• \11
N
-o
0
PHASE 1 SHORT RANGE (2026)
TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 12
_—o'/1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
-7 1 Page 21
I&
N
�s
�a
�o
00
7:00-8:00am/2:30-3:30pm
Ga N
-o
o�
o�
PHASE 2 SHORT RANGE (2029)
TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 13
_—o'/1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
-7 1 Page 22
Signal Warrants
As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location until such time
that signal installation warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices. For the roads in the vicinity of the Liberty Common Middle School
Expansion site, four hour and/or eight hour signal warrants are applicable. These warrants
require much data and are applied when the traffic is actually on the area road system. It is
acknowledged that peak hour signal warrants should not be applied, but since the peak hour
forecasts are readily available in a traffic impact study, it is reasonable to use them to
estimate whether other signal warrants may be met. If peak hour signal warrants will not be
met at a given intersection, it is reasonable to conclude that it is not likely that other signal
warrants would be met. If peak hour signal warrants are met, it merely indicates that further
evaluation should occur in the future as the development occurs. However, a judgment can
be made that some intersections may meet other signal warrants. None of the stop sign
controlled intersections analyzed in this study will meet peak hour signal warrants or signal
spacing criteria and will not be signalized.
Geometry
Figure 14 shows a schematic of the Phase 1 short range (2026) geometry. It is
recommended and assumed that parking will be prohibited along March Court. This will
allow separate eastbound left-turn and right-turn lanes to be striped on March Court
approaching Sharp Point Drive. Since March Court is 34 feet wide, three 10-11 foot lanes
can fit within the width of March Court. The separate turning lanes will improve the operation
of the Sharp Point/March intersection. The geometry at the Sharp Point/Building Driveway,
Sharp Point/ Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton intersections can remain as it currently
exists. Figure 15 shows a schematic of the Phase 2 short range (2029) geometry at the
Sharp Point/March and Sharp Point/Canton intersections.
Operation Analysis
Operation analyses were performed at the Sharp Point/March, Sharp Point/Building
Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton intersections for the Phase 1
short range (2026) future. Operation analyses were performed at the Sharp Point/March
and Sharp Point/Canton intersections for the Phase 2 short range (2029) future. Since it
is assumed that the Liberty Common Elementary School and Middle School will have
staggered start/dismissal times of 20 minutes, the school traffic will be more consistent over
the school peak hours rather than peaking in a 20-30 minute time period. Therefore, peak
hour factors of 0.70 were used for the eastbound left-turn and right-turn movements at the
Sharp Point/March intersection for the Phase 1 short range (2026) and Phase 2 short range
(2029)total analyses. In addition to this, peak hour factors of 0.50 were used for the school
ingressing movements at the key intersections as observed under the existing conditions.
--//LDELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-71 ASSOCIATES Page 23
I&
N
sT
OA
NT
OA
Oo
Gti•
NT
- Denotes Lane
Gti-
N
-o
o�
7�
PHASE 1 SHORT
RANGE (2026) GEOMETRY Figure 14
_—o'/1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
-7 1 Page 24
I&
N
sT
OA
NT
Oo
Parking lots are not
expected to be very
active during the
analyzed peak hours.
O,o
VO�
QaOi�e a�
NT
- Denotes Lane
Gti•
Ga��oa
N
-o
o�
7�
PHASE 2 SHORT
RANGE (2029) GEOMETRY Figure 15
_—o'/1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
-7 1 Page 25
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 10, the Sharp Point/March, Sharp
Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton intersections
operate in the Phase 1 short range (2026) background traffic future as indicated in Table 3.
Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The Sharp Point/March,
Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton
intersections will meet the Fort Collins operational criteria with stop sign control and
existing geometry in the morning and afternoon school peak hours.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 11, the Sharp Point/March and Sharp
Point/Canton intersections operate in the Phase 2 short range (2029) background traffic
future as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix
E. The Sharp Point/March and Sharp Point/Canton intersections will meet the Fort Collins
operational criteria with stop sign control and existing/recommended geometry in the
morning and afternoon school peak hours.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 12, the Sharp Point/March, Sharp
Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton intersections
operate in the Phase 1 short range (2026) total traffic future as indicated in Table 5.
Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The Sharp Point/March,
Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton
intersections will meet the Fort Collins operational criteria with stop sign control and
existing/recommended geometry in the morning and afternoon school peak hours.
Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 13, the Sharp Point/March and Sharp
Point/Canton intersections operate in the Phase 2 short range (2029) total traffic future as
indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix G. The
Sharp Point/March and Sharp Point/Canton intersections will meet the Fort Collins
operational criteria with stop sign control and existing/recommended geometry in the
morning and afternoon school peak hours.
Pedestrian Level of Service
Appendix H shows a map of the area that is within one mile of the Liberty Common
Middle School Expansion site. Based upon observations and the expected attendance
from the pedestrian destinations within one mile of the Liberty Commons Schools, the
number of students that will walk to/from these areas will likely be small. The Liberty
Common Middle School Expansion site is located within an area termed as "School
Walking Area,"which sets the level of service threshold at LOS B for all measured factors,
except for Visual Interest and Amenity which is LOS C. There will be eight pedestrian
destinations within one mile of the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site. These
are: 1) the residential uses to the northeast of the site (Summit View Drive), 2) the
commercial/industrial uses to the west of the site, 3) the EPIC Center to the west of the
site, 4) the residential uses to the west of the site, 5) the residential uses (Bucking Horse)
to the southwest of the site, 6) the residential uses to the southwest of the site (Joseph
Allen Drive), 7) the commercial uses to the south of the site, and 8) the residential uses
(Rigden Farm) to the south of the site.
--//LDELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-71 ASSOCIATES Page 26
TABLE 3
Phase 1 Short Range (2026) Background Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
Sharp Point/March EB LT/RT C B
NB LT A A
(stop sign)
OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT A A
Sharp Point/Building Access NB LT A A
(stop sign)
OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT B B
Sharp Point/Riverbend NB LT A A
(stop sign)
OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT B B
Sharp Point/Canton NB LT A A
(stop sign) OVERALL A A
TABLE 4
Phase 2 Short Range (2029) Background Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
EB LT/RT C B
Sharp Point/March NB LT A A
(stop sign)
OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT B B
Sharp Point/Canton NB LT A A
(stop sign)
OVERALL A A
--//LDELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-7/ ASSOCIATES Page 27
TABLE 5
Phase 1 Short Range (2026) Total Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
EB LT C B
EB RT B B
Sharp Point/March EB APPROACH C B
(stop sign)
NB LT A A
OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT A A
Sharp Point/Building Access NB LT A A
(stop sign)
OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT B B
Sharp Point/Riverbend NB LT A A
(stop sign)
OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT B B
Sharp Point/Canton NB LT A A
(stop sign) OVERALL A A
TABLE 6
Phase 2 Short Range (2029) Total Peak Hour Operation
Intersection Movement Level of Service
AM PM
EB LT D C
EB RT B B
Sharp Point/March EB APPROACH C B
(stop sign)
NB LT A A
OVERALL A A
EB LT/RT C B
Sharp Point/Canton NB LT A A
(stop sign) OVERALL A A
--//LDELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-7/ ASSOCIATES Page 28
There is a planned rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) crosswalk to be
constructed just north of March Court. This will provide a safe crossing of Sharp Point
Drive. There are attached sidewalks (4 foot width) adjacent to the west side of Sharp
Point Drive. Along the east side of Sharp Point Drive is the Poudre Trail sidewalk (10 foot
width). There are attached sidewalks (4 foot width) along both sides of March Court,
Riverbend Court, and Canton Court. There are sidewalks along all streets within a mile
of the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site, except for a short break in the
sidewalk system on the west side of Sharp Point Drive from the intersection of Midpoint
Drive to Canton Court to the north. This section of sidewalk is also missing on the north
side of Midpoint Drive for approximately 420 feet. In addition to this, there are no
sidewalks along Summit View Drive. The sidewalk system is complete within the Bucking
Horse neighborhood to the south and within the Rigden Farm neighborhood south of
Drake Road. Pedestrians can use the sidewalks along the east side of Nancy Gray
Avenue. There is one flashing beacon pedestrian crosswalk across Drake Road at Illinois
Drive. There is access to the Poudre Trail, the Spring Creek Trail, and the Power Trail.
There is also access to the trail adjacent to Prospect Road, east of Sharp Point Drive.
This trail extends to Summit View Drive. Some of the sidewalks along Prospect Road
were built prior to the current standards. Therefore, some of the sidewalks may be
considered to be substandard. The LOS evaluation is below:
• Directness—The distance ratio to all pedestrian destinations is less than 1.2 (LOS
A) using the existing street/sidewalk system.
• Continuity— The sidewalk system to all destination areas has no breaks or gaps,
except for a short break in the sidewalk system on the west side of Sharp Point
Drive and north side of Midpoint Drive. Therefore, destination #2 can only achieve
LOS D. These gaps should be completed by the adjacent properties. In addition
to this, there are no sidewalks along Summit View Drive. Therefore, destination
#1 can only achieve LOS E. Some of the sidewalks along Prospect Road were
built prior to current standards and some are built directly adjacent to the streets
with no landscaped parkways. Therefore, destination #3 can only achieve LOS C.
However, the Spring Creek Trail and the Power Trail are adjacent to destination
#3.
• Street Crossings —There is a signalized pedestrian crossing for destination #1 at
the Prospect/Summit View intersection. However, since there are no sidewalks
along Summit View Drive, only LOS C can be achieved for destination #1. The
street crossings for destinations #3, #4, #6, #7, and #8 all have adequate (LOS B)
signalized pedestrian crosswalks. The street crossings for destinations #2 and #5
have minor street (local/collector) crossings, many of them with stop sign control.
There are no crosswalks on Nancy Gray Avenue. Since Liberty Common Middle
School is a charter school that draws the student population from all over Fort
Collins, it is not likely that the number of pedestrians will exceed the threshold that
would require crosswalk treatments. Therefore, LOS B is achieved for all
destination areas except for destination #1.
• Visual Interest and Amenity — The visual interest and amenity category will be
acceptable at LOS B and C for destination areas #2 through #8, since these are
active pedestrian areas, which generally have enhanced pedestrian features (large
sidewalk widths, landscaping, etc.). Since there are no sidewalks along Summit
View Drive, destination #1 can only achieve LOS E.
--//LDELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-71 ASSOCIATES Page 29
• Security—The security category will be acceptable at LOS A and B for destination
areas#2 through #8, since these are active pedestrian areas, which generally have
good lighting levels and clear lines of sight. Destination #1 can only achieve LOS
E since there are no sidewalks along Summit View Drive, which may make
pedestrians feel uncomfortable walking along the street.
Bicycle Level of Service
Appendix H shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Liberty Common
Middle School Expansion site. There will be one bicycle destination within 1320 feet of
the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site. This is: 1) the Poudre Trail to the
east of the site. The Bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix H. The base level
of service is A and is LOS A for the bicycle destination, since there is a planned
rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) crosswalk to be constructed just north of March
Court.
Transit Level of Service
Currently, this area of Fort Collins is served by Transfort Route 18. Route 18
operates along Prospect Road, Midpoint Drive, and Sharp Point Drive. There is a transit
stop on Sharp Point Drive, just to the north of March Court. In addition to the Transfort
service, Liberty Common will provide school bus service.
—/II—DELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-7 1 [—ASSOCIATES Page 30
IV. CONCLUSIONS
This study assessed the impacts of the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion
site on the street system in the vicinity of the proposed development in the short range
(2029) future. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded:
- The development of the Liberty Common Middle School Expansion site is feasible
from a traffic engineering standpoint. Phase 1 of the Liberty Common Middle School
Expansion trip generation resulted in 504 daily trip ends, 161 morning peak hour
trip ends, and 142 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Phase 2 of the Liberty Common
Middle School Expansion trip generation resulted in 806 daily trip ends, 257
morning peak hour trip ends, and 227 afternoon peak hour trip ends.
- The Sharp Point/March, Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend,
and Sharp Point/Canton intersections are currently operating acceptably with
existing control and geometry in the morning and afternoon school peak hours.
- None of the stop sign controlled intersections analyzed in this study will meet peak
hour signal warrants or signal spacing criteria and will not be signalized.
- In the Phase 1 short range (2026) future, given development of the Liberty Common
Middle School Expansion site and an increase in background traffic, the Sharp
Point/March, Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/Riverbend, and Sharp
Point/Canton intersections will meet the Fort Collins operational criteria with stop
sign control and existing/recommended geometry in the morning and afternoon
school peak hours.
- In the Phase 2 short range (2029) future, given development of the Liberty Common
Middle School Expansion site and an increase in background traffic, the Sharp
Point/March and Sharp Point/Canton intersections will meet the Fort Collins
operational criteria with stop sign control and existing/recommended geometry in
the morning and afternoon school peak hours.
- Figure 14 shows a schematic of the Phase 1 short range (2026) geometry. It is
recommended and assumed that parking will be prohibited along March Court. This
will allow separate eastbound left-turn and right-turn lanes to be striped on March
Court approaching Sharp Point Drive. Since March Court is 34 feet wide, three 10-
11 foot lanes can fit within the width of March Court. The separate turning lanes will
improve the operation of the Sharp Point/ March intersection. The geometry at the
Sharp Point/Building Driveway, Sharp Point/ Riverbend, and Sharp Point/Canton
intersections can remain as it currently exists. Figure 15 shows a schematic of the
Phase 2 short range (2029) geometry at the Sharp Point/March and Sharp
Point/Canton intersections.
- Acceptable level of service is achieved for bicycle and transit modes based upon the
measures in the multi-modal transportation guidelines and the Fort Collins
Pedestrian Plan. Generally, all categories in the pedestrian analysis achieve
—/II—DELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
1 [—ASSOCIATES Page 31
acceptable levels of service. The residential uses northeast of the site (Summit
View Drive)could not achieve acceptable LOS with the continuity, street crossings,
visual interest and amenities, and security categories. The commercial uses
northwest of the site and the EPIC Center could not achieve acceptable LOS with
the continuity category.
--//LDELICH Liberty Common Middle School Expansion ITIS, October 2024
-71 ASSOCIATES Page 32
APPENDIX A
Attachment "A"
Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions
Project Information
Project Name Liberty Common Middle School
Project Location 1845 & 1901 Sharp Point Drive
TIS Assumptions
Type of Study Full: Intermediate: Yes
MTIS: Memo:
Study Area Boundaries North: March Court South: Canton Court
East: Sharp Point Drive West: Sharp Point Drive
Study Years Short Range: 2026 Short Range: 2029
Phase 1 Phase 2
Future Traffic Growth Rate 2% per year (through traffic)
Study Intersections 1. Sharp Point/March 5.
2. Sharp Point/Building
Driveway6.
3. Sharp Point/Riverbend 7.
4. Sharp Point/Canton 8.
Time Period for Study AM: 7:00-9:00 PM: 2:15-4:15 Sat Noon: N/A
Trip Generation Rates (see Per ITE
attached
Trip Adjustment Factors Passby: N/A Captive Market: N/A
Trip Distribution (see attached)
Mode Split Assumptions All Motor Vehicle
Design Vehicle Information Passenger Car
Committed Roadway Improvements City Provide
Other Traffic Studies Prospect Sports
Areas Requiring Special Study Bike & Ped LOS — 1. Access to the trail 2. Access to
the neighborhood to the south
Date: October 17, 2024
Traffic Engineer: Delich Associates A f
Local Entity Engineer: ff_ � _10125-12�-
61
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards—Repealed and Reenacted August 1,2021 Page 4-35
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins
I&
N
Prospect Poudre Tmil
Liberty Common
Midpoint 0 3 March Middle School
C t.. Expansion
•L
Existing Libertv
Common Elem.
E "Oh"l
F- Riverbend
i
Ct.
Canton
Ct.
A
O
P^
ap
�d
Gray cTo�
ry
�qH
AqK
Ro
9Q
Drake
SCALE: 1"=1000'
SITE LOCATION Figure 1
_-- '/1-DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
-7 1 Page 3
4
Cn
N
0
70%
March
Ct.
Phase 1
Phase 2--
Riverbend
Ct.
Canton
Ct. 3p0/0
0
a,
SCALE: 1"=300'
TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 7
_J'f 1—DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
7,1 Page 3
I&
N
SCALE: 1"=100'
SHARP PO1f+1'i pR{4>= w _ S'*RP
Lars e w
m -
I w 1-i1
t'
v
p.RcEL w.ettOlui Q .
1 4 BU T 1 SUIT 19rf I t to �� � • �'�� i
CURRENT OCCUP+Sr.Cv:B G51 '
C4m5r ER n•e f yyyyyr PI AR=AN IIr
f r 9s W=SQ FTD Y I,� t 11140E X ePAtOrWb
� r 3 I eu¢r:leaf LEA �
4 I C4rRR9NT a4wANcv:e
Lr CarlSi.irPE:II; 1.f \ I r tl FU ^u•._ ,r;TEn.n $PRIrbgERak ♦ U
Z
f r •`�• \,lrf'tlY-fXKLf51 '� ry1(f
ww - 'S
'' -�F,�i• .i ws.• !'\'� i - _ -. .3"l:t'"Jt_—'i 7� - 1�
PROPOSED JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
1825 Sharp Point \ _ \ _ /•',,3 n. i- �°
SW•Ft.Total: 19.200 Sq,ft.
Parking Spaces=111 spaces(unmediately adjacent to school,
for school use,additional parking remains for existing buildings Exlsnkc,FIRE \\ 1•\ v, F - *vy$ P
to remain,not included in 111 space count) XroRwr ra eeuuX '\\•\i \.\.\ - it i 3 1 I ® , la
IEnrollmeM!Staff;
7th and 8th grade students only i \•\ \t\.ti Q� j cwaeisENrvPEcu�JrNcr:a 'I
Enrollment: 239 students -y y SPRWRLERG'N �1�'�
Staff: 20-25 staff
\.,.
Project Scope: 33`
A Poudre School District Charter School is considering
purchase of the properly between March Court and Canton ■ \, •\ 11. "
Court southwest of Sharp Point Drive,including the 5 buildings f- - \ •\ t
indicated here. Ise tE9 R Ea Elms• \ \'
Project scope to include change of occupancy of 1825 Sharp —
Point from 6 to E occupancy.and tenant finish to accommodate !" cumRENr occupakcv E \\•\ I ``-•� ---
classrooms,administralion and support spaces. There are no 1 CONs'°'°E"� T• \ i
sPRwKLtea ;
site grading or drainage modifications,no landscape � s:wa so F, \ �•
moddications,no changes to the facade and no utility �- r.r e.91.r - - - _�„J —��•—•—�r ——._._._. .
moddicatiom as part of this project. ,,,,,,,,,,.�,,,,,,,w„�,..,,,,,,,�.w...,,•,..�,�,...'m..,,�,......,.,r.<r w..r.,..,...,•.,.Y,w,...,,,�
Change of occupancy and renovations of 1825 Sharp Point to
be complete(of start of school,Fall 2025. 333'-0"
LEGEND
❑ Area of renovation
❑ Existing buildings to remain
4 Proposed Drop QfE I Pick Up(175'-0",7 vehicles)
i� Proposed Queuing
-•. Property Line
---- Utility Easement
PHASE 1 SITE PLAN Figure 5
_J'f 1-DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
7 1 Page 5
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
Code Use Size
AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out
Phase 1
522 Middle School 239 2.10 502 0.67 86 0.67 74 0.59 65 0.59 76
students 54% 46% 46% 54%
Phase 2
522 Middle School 384 2.10 806 0.67 139 0.67 118 0.59 104 0.59 123
students 54% 46% 46% 54%
Afternoon peak hour rate from ITE was deemed too small. Adjustment made by using
0.59 (AM Generator (0.74) minus PM Street (0.15)).
Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards—Repealed and Reenacted August 1,2021 Page 4-35
Adopted by Larimer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins
I&
N
SCALE: 1"=100'
�•wG4TE RITE PEluO C-UPT
sops?POINT OftwE � S'YARp
Poilw-
29
p3 _
i _ 9
p Ira 2#
� O e
I .\ .. @ O
I ti
z
\ \ U
r .
AIR
t 8
ENFRY
1IF
- \•\• \•\ T SPIV' ^' (A.��,.
PROPOSED JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL \o.�—Ts I49
1825-1901 Sharp Point+gym+link
Sq.Ft.Total' 55,330 Sq.tit.. Pa aP-0Pr.Dui ` �' Y•.•'J-. tit
Parking Spaces=241 spaces(not Including parking along `•, '. ...,��- ,f•
Sharp Paird Drive) ,�,?IearlRe •,\ ,•�. •!�{ F '•v� V $
RMMART TO R£11wIR ' '
Enrollment7Stelf: �'• � I PMcex.:nmresem I �' �� +
7th and 8tr grade students only •\r 'ti I o�ca•e
Enrollment 384 students "•� Iy� - f I au+rti�riiaccw..Rcr:e 1� i
Staff 30-35 staff
Project Scope: i -,28\''� ..;�y _�.,� .I Pi�ew.e• J CA I .
A Poudre School District Charter School is considering
purchase of the property between March Court and Canton
Court southwest of Sharp Pont Drive.including the 5 buildings , \ - \ 1\i' I I• '�0�-'1
indicated here. +----
Project scope to include change of occupancy of 1825 SharpIN,
PM69..t+126rOS0a'/
Point and 1901 Sharp Point from B to E occupancy. Renovation
of both 1825 and 1901 Sharp Poonl to accommodate classroom, r eue.r.+see •\,. { _ v i• } i
CYlllaa{POC{YPANCY:L 1^r
administration and support spaces. Gonslcuction of an addition I cansr PIS va
'clinking'1825 and 1901 to Include a gymnasium,cafetena and
r SPnlrk"relm:v
flex space.
P°°0E-�se••s
Timing of completion of Master Plan is TBD ............................. ter... •_.-,.,r....,�..•„.,..,.•.,..,ti.... �.�e.,,....a,l...,i
LEGEND
333'0•
Area of renovation
® Area of addition
Existing buildings to remain
I Proposed access I fire lane
�!t ! Proposed Drop Off Pick Up(175'-0'.7 vehicles)
4 Proposed Oueuirg
.... Property Line
---- Utility Easement
PHASE 2 SITE PLAN Figure 6
_J'f 1-DELICH
ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
7,1 Page 5
APPENDIX B
DELICH ASSOCIATES
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND,CO 80538
Phone: 970 669-2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 9/24/2024 Observer: Vickie
Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
R=right turn Intersection: Sharp Point/March
S=straight
L=left turn
Time Northbound: Sharp Point Southbound: Sharp Point Total Eastbound: March Westbound: Total Total
Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All
7:00 0 11 11 14 0 14 25 1 0 1 0 1 26
7:15 1 25 26 34 1 35 61 1 6 7 0 7 68
7:30 22 63 85 42 5 47 132 17 43 60 0 60 192
7:45 0 35 35 49 7 56 91 24 51 75 0 75 166
8:00 8 27 35 27 2 29 64 3 8 11 0 11 75
i
15 0 23 23 36 1 37 60 3 1 4 0 4 64
30450 28 28 29 0 29 57 0 0 0 0 t0 57
0 17 17 24 1 25 1 42 5 3 8 0 1 8 50
7:00-8:00 23 134 0 157 0 139 13 152 309 43 0 100 143 0 0 0 0 143 452
PHF 0.26 0.53 nla 0.46 nla 0.71 0.46 0.68 0.59 0.45 nla 0.49 0.48 nla nla nla nla 0.48 0.59
2:15 1 13 14 15 1 16 30 2 4 6 0 6 36
2:30 5 32 37 20 8 28 65 0 0 0 0 0 65
2:45 5 30 35 37 9 46 81 1 2 3 0 3 84
3:00 5 22 27 40 14 54 81 26 31 57 0 57 138
3:15 3 30 33 21 14 35 68 8 14 22 0 22 90
3:30 3 34 37 29 3 32 69 17 13 30 0 30 99
3:45 1 21 22 18 2 20 42 5 3 8 0 8 50
4:00 3 22 25 18 1 19 44 2 3 5 0 5 49
2:30-3:30 18 114 0 132 0 118 45 163 295 35 0 47 82 0 0 0 0 82 377
PHF 0.9 0.89 nla 0.89 nla 0.74 1 0.8 0.75 0.91 0.34 nla 0.38 0.36 nla nla nla nla 0.36 0.68
DELICH ASSOCIATES
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND,CO 80538
Phone: 970 669-2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 9/24/2024 Observer: Vickie
Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
R=right turn Intersection: Sharp Point/Building Driveway
S=straight
L=left turn
Time Northbound: Sharp Point Southbound: Sharp Point Total Eastbound: Building Drivew Westbound: Total Total
Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All
7:00 0 11 11 14 0 14 25 0 0 0 0 0 25
7:15 0 26 26 40 0 40 66 0 0 0 0 0 66
7:30 0 84 84 85 0 85 169 1 0 1 0 1 170
7:45 0 35 35 100 0 100 135 0 0 0 0 0 135
8:00 0 35 35 35 0 35 70 0 0 0 0 0 70
j8:
15 0 23 23 36 1 37 60 0 0 0 0 0 60
30 1 28 29 28 1 29 58 0 0 0 0 0 58
45 0 16 16 27 0 27 1 43 1 0 1 0 1 1 44
7:00-8:00 0 156 0 156 0 239 0 239 395 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 396
PHF nla 0.46 nla 0.46 nla 0.6 nla 0.6 0.58 0.25 nla nla 0.25 nla nla nla nla 0.25 0.58
2:15 0 14 14 18 1 19 33 0 2 2 0 2 35
2:30 0 37 37 20 0 20 57 0 0 0 0 0 57
2:45 1 35 36 35 4 39 75 0 0 0 0 0 75
3:00 0 26 26 71 0 71 97 1 0 1 0 1 98
3:15 0 32 32 35 0 35 67 1 0 1 0 1 68
3:30 1 35 36 42 0 42 78 2 0 2 0 2 80
3:45 0 22 22 20 1 21 43 0 0 0 0 0 43
4:00 0 25 25 21 0 21 46 0 0 0 0 0 46
2:30-3:30 1 130 0 131 0 161 4 165 296 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 298
PHF 0.25 1 0.88 nla 0.89 nla 1 0.57 1 0.25 1 0.58 0.76 0.5 nla nla 0.5 nla nla nla nla 0.5 0.76
DELICH ASSOCIATES
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND,CO 80538
Phone: 970 669-2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 9/25/2024 Observer: Vickie
Day: Wednesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
R=right turn Intersection: Sharp Point/Riverbend
S=straight
L=left turn
Time Northbound: Sharp Point Southbound: Sharp Point Total Eastbound: Riverbend Westbound: Total Total
Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All
7:00 1 14 15 18 2 20 35 0 1 1 0 1 36
7:15 1 28 29 36 1 37 66 0 0 0 0 0 66
7:30 0 55 55 79 1 80 135 0 1 1 0 1 136
7:45 2 63 65 105 3 108 173 2 5 7 0 7 180
8:00 1 19 20 32 3 35 55 0 1 1 0 1 56
i
15 2 21 23 27 1 28 51 0 1 1 0 1 52
30453 22 25 27 2 29 54 2 0 2 0 t2 56
2 24 26 29 2 31 1 57 0 1 1 0 1 1 58
7:00-8:00 4 160 0 164 0 238 7 245 409 2 0 7 9 0 0 0 0 9 418
PHF 0.5 0.63 nla 0.63 nla 0.57 0.58 0.57 0.59 0.25 nla 0.35 0.32 nla nla nla nla 0.32 0.58
2:15 3 16 19 21 1 22 41 0 3 3 0 3 44
2:30 1 28 29 16 6 22 51 3 4 7 0 7 58
2:45 11 30 41 16 7 23 64 4 4 8 0 8 72
3:00 3 28 31 78 8 86 117 2 13 15 0 15 132
3:15 1 32 33 28 1 29 62 1 9 10 0 10 72
3:30 5 30 35 46 2 48 83 2 8 10 0 10 93
3:45 0 31 31 25 3 28 59 1 1 2 0 2 61
4:00 1 24 25 19 3 22 47 2 4 6 0 6 53
2:30-3:30 16 118 0 134 0 138 22 160 294 10 0 30 40 0 0 0 0 40 334
PHF 1 0.36 1 0.92 nla 0.82 nla 0.44 0.69 0.47 0.63 0.63 nla 0.58 0.67 nla nla nla nla 0.67 0.63
DELICH ASSOCIATES
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND,CO 80538
Phone: 970 669-2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 10/16/2024 Observer: Vickie
Day: Wednesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
R=right turn Intersection: Sharp Point/Canton
S=straight
L=left turn
Time Northbound: Sharp Point Southbound: Sharp Point Total Eastbound: Canton Westbound: Total Total
Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All
7:00 1 21 22 17 1 18 40 0 3 3 0 3 43
7:15 1 42 43 53 0 53 96 1 1 2 0 2 98
7:30 2 85 87 90 0 90 177 0 0 0 0 0 177
7:45 5 23 28 56 2 58 86 0 0 0 0 0 86
8:00 2 14 16 19 5 24 40 0 3 3 0 3 43
i
15 1 19 20 20 1 21 41 1 0 1 0 1 42
30454 20 24 13 0 13 37 2 1 3 0 t3 40
2 16 18 12 1 13 31 2 0 2 0 2 33
7:00-8:00 9 171 0 180 0 216 3 219 399 1 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 5 404
PHF 0.45 1 0.5 nla 0.52 nla 0.6 0.38 0.61 0.56 0.25 nla 0.33 0.42 nla nla nla nla 0.42 0.57
2:15 1 15 16 18 1 19 35 1 2 3 0 3 38
2:30 0 22 22 23 0 23 45 1 1 2 0 2 47
2:45 1 44 45 19 3 22 67 1 3 4 0 4 71
3:00 2 27 29 92 1 93 122 2 6 8 0 8 130
3:15 0 40 40 46 2 48 88 1 1 2 0 2 90
3:30 0 24 24 45 1 46 70 2 3 5 0 5 75
3:45 1 27 28 37 1 38 66 1 2 3 0 3 69
4:00 0 26 26 23 1 24 50 0 3 3 0 3 53
2:30-3:30 3 133 0 136 0 180 6 186 322 5 0 11 16 0 0 0 0 16 338
PHF 0.38 1 0.76 1 nla 0.76 nla 1 0.49 1 0.5 0.5 0.66 0.63 nla 0.46 0.5 nla nla nla nla 0.5 0.65
APPENDIX C
HCM 6th TWSC Recent AM
3: Sharp Point Drive & March Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 6.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 43 100 23 137 142 13
Future Vol,veh/h 43 100 23 137 142 13
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 45 49 26 53 71 46
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 96 204 88 258 200 28
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 648 214 228 0 0
Stage 1 214 - - - -
Stage 2 434 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 435 826 1340 - -
Stage 1 822 - - - -
Stage 2 653 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 402 826 1340 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 402 - - - -
Stage 1 759 - - -
Stage 2 653 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 16.2 2 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1340 618 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.066 0.485 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.9 0 16.2 -
HCM Lane LOS A A C -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 2.6 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
recent am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Recent PM
3: Sharp Point Drive & March Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 4.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 35 47 18 113 118 45
Future Vol,veh/h 35 47 18 113 118 45
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 34 38 90 89 74 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 103 124 20 127 159 56
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 354 187 215 0 0
Stage 1 187 - - - -
Stage 2 167 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 644 855 1355 - -
Stage 1 845 - - - -
Stage 2 863 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 634 855 1355 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 634 - - - -
Stage 1 831 - - -
Stage 2 863 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 12 1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1355 738 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 0.307 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.7 0 12 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 1.3 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
recent pm.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Recent AM
7: Sharp Point Drive & Building Driveway
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 0 0 159 242 0
Future Vol,veh/h 1 0 0 159 242 0
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 85 85 46 60 85
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 0 0 346 403 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 749 403 403 0 0
Stage 1 403 - - - -
Stage 2 346 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 379 647 1156 - -
Stage 1 675 - - - -
Stage 2 716 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 379 647 1156 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 379 - - - -
Stage 1 675 - - -
Stage 2 716 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 14.6 0 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1156 379 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.011 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 0 14.6 -
HCM Lane LOS A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
recent am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Recent PM
7: Sharp Point Drive & Building Driveway
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 2 0 1 129 161 4
Future Vol,veh/h 2 0 1 129 161 4
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 50 85 25 88 57 25
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 0 4 147 282 16
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 445 290 298 0 0
Stage 1 290 - - - -
Stage 2 155 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 571 749 1263 - -
Stage 1 759 - - - -
Stage 2 873 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 569 749 1263 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 569 - - - -
Stage 1 757 - - -
Stage 2 873 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 11.4 0.2 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1263 569 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 0.007 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.9 0 11.4 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
recent pm.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Recent AM
5: Sharp Point Drive & Riverbend Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y 4 T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 2 7 4 157 235 8
Future Vol,veh/h 2 7 4 157 235 8
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 35 50 63 57 58
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 20 8 249 412 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 684 419 426 0 0
Stage 1 419 - - - -
Stage 2 265 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 414 634 1133 - -
Stage 1 664 - - - -
Stage 2 779 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 411 634 1133 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 411 - - - -
Stage 1 659 - - -
Stage 2 779 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 11.9 0.3 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1133 549 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.051 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.2 0 11.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
recent am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Recent PM
5: Sharp Point Drive & Riverbend Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 1.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 10 30 16 120 139 22
Future Vol,veh/h 10 30 16 120 139 22
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 58 36 92 44 69
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 16 52 44 130 316 32
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 550 332 348 0 0
Stage 1 332 - - - -
Stage 2 218 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 496 710 1211 - -
Stage 1 727 - - - -
Stage 2 818 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 477 710 1211 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 477 - - - -
Stage 1 699 - - -
Stage 2 818 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 11.3 2.1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1211 637 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 0.106 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 0 11.3 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.4 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
recent pm.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Recent AM
9: Sharp Point Drive & Canton Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y 4 T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 4 9 160 239 3
Future Vol,veh/h 1 4 9 160 239 3
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 33 45 50 60 38
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 12 20 320 398 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 762 402 406 0 0
Stage 1 402 - - - -
Stage 2 360 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 373 648 1153 - -
Stage 1 676 - - - -
Stage 2 706 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 365 648 1153 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 365 - - - -
Stage 1 662 - - -
Stage 2 706 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 11.8 0.5 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1153 543 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 0.03 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.2 0 11.8 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
recent am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Recent PM
9: Sharp Point Drive & Canton Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 11 3 131 163 6
Future Vol,veh/h 5 11 3 131 163 6
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 46 38 76 49 50
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 24 8 172 333 12
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 527 339 345 0 0
Stage 1 339 - - - -
Stage 2 188 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 512 703 1214 - -
Stage 1 722 - - - -
Stage 2 844 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 508 703 1214 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 508 - - - -
Stage 1 717 - - -
Stage 2 844 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 10.9 0.3 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1214 642 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.05 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8 0 10.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
recent pm.syn
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level-of-Service Average Total Delay
sec/veh
A < 10
B > 10 and < 15
c > 15 and < 25
D > 25 and < 35
E > 35 and < 50
F > 50
Table 4-2
Fort Collins (GMA and City Limits)
Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections)
Overall Any Any
Approach Leg Movement
Signalized D' E E2
Unsignalized E3 F4
Arterial/Arterial
Collector/Collector
Unsignalized D3 F4
Arterial/Collector
Arterial/Local
Collector/Local
Local/Local
Roundabout E3,5 E5,4 E5
' In mixed use district including downtown as defined by structure plan,overall LOS E is acceptable
2 Applicable with at least 5%of total entering volume
3 Use weighed average to identify overall delay
4 Mitigation may be required
5 Apply unsignalized delay value thresholds to determine LOS
APPENDIX D
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Bkgrd AM
3: Sharp Point Drive & March Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 6.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 43 100 23 143 148 13
Future Vol,veh/h 43 100 23 143 148 13
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 45 49 26 53 71 46
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 96 204 88 270 208 28
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 668 222 236 0 0
Stage 1 222 - - - -
Stage 2 446 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 423 818 1331 - -
Stage 1 815 - - - -
Stage 2 645 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 390 818 1331 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 390 - - - -
Stage 1 751 - - -
Stage 2 645 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 16.6 1.9 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1331 606 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.066 0.494 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.9 0 16.6 -
HCM Lane LOS A A C -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 2.7 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Bkgrd PM
3: Sharp Point Drive & March Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 4.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 35 47 18 118 123 45
Future Vol,veh/h 35 47 18 118 123 45
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 34 38 90 89 74 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 103 124 20 133 166 56
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 367 194 222 0 0
Stage 1 194 - - - -
Stage 2 173 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 633 847 1347 - -
Stage 1 839 - - - -
Stage 2 857 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 623 847 1347 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 623 - - - -
Stage 1 826 - - -
Stage 2 857 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 12.2 1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1347 728 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 0.311 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.7 0 12.2 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 1.3 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb pm.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Bkgrd AM
7: Sharp Point Drive & Building Driveway
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 166 248 0
Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 166 248 0
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 85 85 46 60 85
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 361 413 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 774 413 413 0 0
Stage 1 413 - - - -
Stage 2 361 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 367 639 1146 - -
Stage 1 668 - - - -
Stage 2 705 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 367 639 1146 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 367 - - - -
Stage 1 668 - - -
Stage 2 705 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1146 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -
HCM Control Delay(s) 0 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Bkgrd PM
7: Sharp Point Drive & Building Driveway
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 136 170 0
Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 136 170 0
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 50 85 25 88 57 25
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 155 298 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 453 298 298 0 0
Stage 1 298 - - - -
Stage 2 155 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 565 741 1263 - -
Stage 1 753 - - - -
Stage 2 873 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 565 741 1263 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 565 - - - -
Stage 1 753 - - -
Stage 2 873 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1263 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -
HCM Control Delay(s) 0 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb pm.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Bkgrd AM
5: Sharp Point Drive & Riverbend Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y 4 T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 2 7 4 164 241 8
Future Vol,veh/h 2 7 4 164 241 8
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 35 50 63 57 58
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 20 8 260 423 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 706 430 437 0 0
Stage 1 430 - - - -
Stage 2 276 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 402 625 1123 - -
Stage 1 656 - - - -
Stage 2 771 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 399 625 1123 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 399 - - - -
Stage 1 651 - - -
Stage 2 771 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 12.1 0.2 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1123 538 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.052 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.2 0 12.1 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Bkgrd PM
5: Sharp Point Drive & Riverbend Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 1.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 10 30 16 126 148 22
Future Vol,veh/h 10 30 16 126 148 22
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 58 36 92 44 69
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 16 52 44 137 336 32
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 577 352 368 0 0
Stage 1 352 - - - -
Stage 2 225 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 478 692 1191 - -
Stage 1 712 - - - -
Stage 2 812 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 459 692 1191 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 459 - - - -
Stage 1 684 - - -
Stage 2 812 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 11.5 2 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1191 618 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 0.109 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 0 11.5 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.4 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb pm.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Bkgrd AM
9: Sharp Point Drive & Canton Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y 4 T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 4 9 169 244 3
Future Vol,veh/h 1 4 9 169 244 3
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 33 45 50 60 38
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 12 20 338 407 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 789 411 415 0 0
Stage 1 411 - - - -
Stage 2 378 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 359 641 1144 - -
Stage 1 669 - - - -
Stage 2 693 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 351 641 1144 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 351 - - - -
Stage 1 654 - - -
Stage 2 693 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 12 0.5 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1144 532 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 0.03 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.2 0 12 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Bkgrd PM
9: Sharp Point Drive & Canton Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 11 3 137 171 6
Future Vol,veh/h 5 11 3 137 171 6
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 46 38 76 49 50
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 24 8 180 349 12
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 551 355 361 0 0
Stage 1 355 - - - -
Stage 2 196 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 495 689 1198 - -
Stage 1 710 - - - -
Stage 2 837 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 492 689 1198 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 492 - - - -
Stage 1 705 - - -
Stage 2 837 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 11.1 0.3 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1198 626 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.051 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8 0 11.1 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb pm.syn
APPENDIX E
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 2 Short Bkgrd AM
3: Sharp Point Drive & March Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 6.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 43 100 23 151 157 13
Future Vol,veh/h 43 100 23 151 157 13
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 45 49 26 53 71 46
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 96 204 88 285 221 28
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 696 235 249 0 0
Stage 1 235 - - - -
Stage 2 461 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 408 804 1317 - -
Stage 1 804 - - - -
Stage 2 635 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 376 804 1317 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 376 - - - -
Stage 1 740 - - -
Stage 2 635 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 17.2 1.9 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1317 590 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 0.508 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.9 0 17.2 -
HCM Lane LOS A A C -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 2.9 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb am phase 2.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 2 Short Bkgrd PM
3: Sharp Point Drive & March Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 4.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 35 47 18 125 130 45
Future Vol,veh/h 35 47 18 125 130 45
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 34 38 90 89 74 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 103 124 20 140 176 56
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 384 204 232 0 0
Stage 1 204 - - - -
Stage 2 180 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 619 837 1336 - -
Stage 1 830 - - - -
Stage 2 851 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 609 837 1336 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 609 - - - -
Stage 1 817 - - -
Stage 2 851 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 12.4 1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1336 715 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 0.317 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.7 0 12.4 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 1.4 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb pm phase 2.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 2 Short Bkgrd AM
9: Sharp Point Drive & Canton Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 3 9 12 171 249 8
Future Vol,veh/h 3 9 12 171 249 8
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 33 45 50 60 38
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 12 27 27 342 415 21
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 822 426 436 0 0
Stage 1 426 - - - -
Stage 2 396 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 344 628 1124 - -
Stage 1 659 - - - -
Stage 2 680 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 334 628 1124 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 334 - - - -
Stage 1 639 - - -
Stage 2 680 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 12.9 0.6 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1124 495 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.079 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.3 0 12.9 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.3 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb am phase 2.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 2 Short Bkgrd PM
9: Sharp Point Drive & Canton Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 2.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 34 15 130 164 13
Future Vol,veh/h 13 34 15 130 164 13
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 46 38 76 49 50
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 21 74 39 171 335 26
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 597 348 361 0 0
Stage 1 348 - - - -
Stage 2 249 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 466 695 1198 - -
Stage 1 715 - - - -
Stage 2 792 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 449 695 1198 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 449 - - - -
Stage 1 689 - - -
Stage 2 792 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 11.8 1.5 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1198 621 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 0.152 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 0 11.8 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.5 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
sb pm phase 2.syn
APPENDIX F
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Total AM
3: Sharp Point Drive & March Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 4.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations r *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 95 122 23 143 209 13
Future Vol,veh/h 95 122 23 143 209 13
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 200 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 26 53 71 46
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 112 144 88 270 294 28
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 754 308 322 0 0
Stage 1 308 - - - -
Stage 2 446 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 377 732 1238 - -
Stage 1 745 - - - -
Stage 2 645 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 345 732 1238 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 345 - - - -
Stage 1 682 - - -
Stage 2 645 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 15.2 2 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1238 345 732 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.071 0.324 0.196 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 0 20.4 11.1 -
HCM Lane LOS A A C B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 1.4 0.7 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Total PM
3: Sharp Point Drive & March Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 4.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations r *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 89 70 18 118 168 45
Future Vol,veh/h 89 70 18 118 168 45
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 200 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 90 89 74 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 127 100 20 133 227 56
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 428 255 283 0 0
Stage 1 255 - - - -
Stage 2 173 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 584 784 1279 - -
Stage 1 788 - - - -
Stage 2 857 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 574 784 1279 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 574 - - - -
Stage 1 775 - - -
Stage 2 857 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 11.8 1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1279 574 784 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 0.222 0.128 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.9 0 13 10.3 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.8 0.4 -
Scenario 1 10/25/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st pm.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Total AM
7: Sharp Point Drive & Building Driveway
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 166 270 61
Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 166 270 61
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 85 50 46 60 50
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 361 450 122
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 872 511 572 0 0
Stage 1 511 - - - -
Stage 2 361 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 321 563 1001 - -
Stage 1 602 - - - -
Stage 2 705 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 321 563 1001 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 321 - - - -
Stage 1 602 - - -
Stage 2 705 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1001 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -
HCM Control Delay(s) 0 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Total PM
7: Sharp Point Drive & Building Driveway
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 136 193 45
Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 136 193 45
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 50 85 25 88 57 50
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 155 339 90
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 539 384 429 0 0
Stage 1 384 - - - -
Stage 2 155 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 503 664 1130 - -
Stage 1 688 - - - -
Stage 2 873 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 503 664 1130 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 503 - - - -
Stage 1 688 - - -
Stage 2 873 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1130 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -
HCM Control Delay(s) 0 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st pm.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Total AM
5: Sharp Point Drive & Riverbend Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 2 7 30 164 263 7
Future Vol,veh/h 2 7 30 164 263 7
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 35 50 63 57 58
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 20 60 260 461 12
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 847 467 473 0 0
Stage 1 467 - - - -
Stage 2 380 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 332 596 1089 - -
Stage 1 631 - - - -
Stage 2 691 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 311 596 1089 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 311 - - - -
Stage 1 591 - - -
Stage 2 691 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 13.1 1.6 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1089 472 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 0.059 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.5 0 13.1 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 0.2 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Total PM
5: Sharp Point Drive & Riverbend Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 2.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 10 30 36 126 171 22
Future Vol,veh/h 10 30 36 126 171 22
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 58 50 92 44 69
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 16 52 72 137 389 32
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 686 405 421 0 0
Stage 1 405 - - - -
Stage 2 281 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 413 646 1138 - -
Stage 1 673 - - - -
Stage 2 767 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 385 646 1138 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 385 - - - -
Stage 1 627 - - -
Stage 2 767 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 12.4 2.9 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1138 557 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.063 0.121 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.4 0 12.4 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 0.4 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st pm.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Total AM
9: Sharp Point Drive & Canton Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 4 9 195 266 3
Future Vol,veh/h 1 4 9 195 266 3
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 33 45 50 60 38
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 12 20 390 443 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 877 447 451 0 0
Stage 1 447 - - - -
Stage 2 430 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 319 612 1109 - -
Stage 1 644 - - - -
Stage 2 656 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 312 612 1109 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 312 - - - -
Stage 1 629 - - -
Stage 2 656 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 12.5 0.4 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1109 494 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 0.033 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.3 0 12.5 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st am.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 1 Short Total PM
9: Sharp Point Drive & Canton Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 11 3 157 194 6
Future Vol,veh/h 5 11 3 157 194 6
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 46 38 76 49 50
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 24 8 207 396 12
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 625 402 408 0 0
Stage 1 402 - - - -
Stage 2 223 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 449 648 1151 - -
Stage 1 676 - - - -
Stage 2 814 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 445 648 1151 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 445 - - - -
Stage 1 671 - - -
Stage 2 814 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 11.5 0.3 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1151 582 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.055 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 0 11.5 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st pm.syn
APPENDIX G
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 2 Short Total AM
3: Sharp Point Drive & March Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 7.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations r *T 1
Traffic Vol,veh/h 126 135 23 151 254 13
Future Vol,veh/h 126 135 23 151 254 13
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 200 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 26 53 71 46
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 180 193 88 285 358 28
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 833 372 386 0 0
Stage 1 372 - - - -
Stage 2 461 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 339 674 1172 - -
Stage 1 697 - - - -
Stage 2 635 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 309 674 1172 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 309 - - - -
Stage 1 635 - - -
Stage 2 635 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 21.8 2 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1172 309 674 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.075 0.583 0.286 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.3 0 31.7 12.5 -
HCM Lane LOS A A D B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 3.4 1.2 -
Scenario 1 10/25/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st am phase 2.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 2 Short Total PM
3: Sharp Point Drive & March Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 5.2
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations r *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 121 84 18 125 203 45
Future Vol,veh/h 121 84 18 125 203 45
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 200 0 - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 70 70 90 89 74 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 173 120 20 140 274 56
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 482 302 330 0 0
Stage 1 302 - - - -
Stage 2 180 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 543 738 1229 - -
Stage 1 750 - - - -
Stage 2 851 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 533 738 1229 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 533 - - - -
Stage 1 737 - - -
Stage 2 851 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 13.3 1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 1229 533 738 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 0.324 0.163 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 8 0 15 10.8 -
HCM Lane LOS A A C B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 1.4 0.6 -
Scenario 1 10/25/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st pm phase 2.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 2 Short Total AM
9: Sharp Point Drive & Canton Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 3 9 54 171 284 105
Future Vol,veh/h 3 9 54 171 284 105
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 33 50 50 60 50
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 12 27 108 342 473 210
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1136 578 683 0 0
Stage 1 578 - - - -
Stage 2 558 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 223 516 910 - -
Stage 1 561 - - - -
Stage 2 573 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 190 516 910 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 190 - - - -
Stage 1 479 - - -
Stage 2 573 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 17 2.3 0
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 910 339 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.119 0.116 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 9.5 0 17 -
HCM Lane LOS A A C -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.4 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st am phase 2.syn
HCM 6th TWSC Phase 2 Short Total PM
9: Sharp Point Drive & Canton Court
Intersection
Int Delay,s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations Y *T T
Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 34 46 130 201 86
Future Vol,veh/h 13 34 46 130 201 86
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 - - -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 -
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 46 50 76 49 50
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 21 74 92 171 410 172
Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All 851 496 582 0 0
Stage 1 496 - - - -
Stage 2 355 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 330 574 992 - -
Stage 1 612 - - - -
Stage 2 710 - - - -
Platoon blocked,% - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 296 574 992 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 296 - - - -
Stage 1 550 - - -
Stage 2 710 - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay,s 14.4 3.1 0
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity(veh/h) 992 476 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.093 0.199 -
HCM Control Delay(s) 9 0 14.4 -
HCM Lane LOS A A B -
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 - 0.7 -
Scenario 1 10/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report
st pm phase 2.syn
APPENDIX H
1
E
Prospect /P..ftT 11
sQw9a o= l Liberty Common
2F3.14Marc
Middle School
°' Expansion
RiveYoend
Cl.
- /a Canton
a Ct.
a O/�
f
^P.
a'cy Gray
6
Drake
7
8
SCALE: 1"=2000'
PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA
_-o'/1-DELICH
-71 [-ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
Table 3
Pedestrian LOS Worksheet
Project Location Classification:School Walking Area
Description of Destination Level of Service(minimum based on project location classification)
Applicable Destination Area Street visual
Area Within 1320' Classification Directness Continuity Crossings Ameest& Security
ies
Minimum B B B C B
1 Residential uses to the Residential Actual A E C E E
northeast of the site
Proposed A E C E E
Minimum B B B C B
2 Commercial uses to the Commercial Actual A D B C B
west of the site
Proposed A D B C B
Minimum B B B C B
3 EPIC Center to the west Recreational Actual A C B B A
of the site
Proposed A C B B A
Minimum B B B C B
4 Residential uses to the Residential Actual A A B B B
west of the site
Proposed A A B B B
Minimum B B B C B
5 Residential uses to the Residential Actual A A B B A
southwest of the site
Proposed A A B B A
Minimum B B B C B
6 Residential uses to the Residential Actual A A B B A
southwest of the site
Proposed A A B B A
Minimum B B B C B
� Commercial uses to the Commercial Actual A A B B A
south of the site
Proposed A A B B A
Minimum B B B C B
8 Residential uses to the Residential Actual A A B B A
south of the site
Proposed A A B B A
Minimum
9 Actual
Proposed
I&
N
Prospect
Poudre Trail
Cn
O 3
>•N
1
March
Ct.
Riverbend
Ct.
oCanton
Ct.
1
A
0
GO'e
9G
oti
��RTti
SCALE: 1"=600'
BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA
_-o'/1-DELICH
-7,1 [-ASSOCIATES Liberty Common Middle School Expansion TIS, October 2024
Bicycle LOS Worksheet
Level of Service—Connectivity
Minimum Actual Proposed
Base Connectivity: A
Specific connections to priority sites:
Description of Destination
Applicable Destination Area
Area Within 1320' Classification
1 Poudre Trail Recreation A B A
2
3
4
5
6
7
8