No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPROSPECT PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT SPAR - SPA240003 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - Traffic Study PROSPECT PLAZA STUDENT HOUSING TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2024 Prepared for: Tetrad Real Estate, LLC 1730 South College Avenue, #200 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 "7 Project #2409 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS..........................................................................................2 LandUse......................................................................................................................... 2 Roads..............................................................................................................................2 ExistingTraffic................................................................................................................. 5 ExistingOperation........................................................................................................... 5 Pedestrians Facilities ...................................................... ......................................... 10 BicycleFacilities............................................................................................................ 10 TransitFacilities ............................................................................................................ 10 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT............................................................................... 11 TripGeneration ............................................................................................................. 11 TripDistribution ............................................................................................................. 11 Background Traffic Projections ..................................................................................... 14 TripAssignment ............................................................................................................ 14 SignalWarrants............................................................................................................. 14 OperationAnalysis ........................................................................................................ 14 Geometry ......................................................................................................................22 Pedestrian Level of Service........................................................................................... 22 BicycleLevel of Service ................................................................................................26 Transit Level of Service................................................................................................. 26 IV. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................. 27 LIST OF TABLES 1 . Current Peak Hour Operation.................................................................................... 9 2. Trip Generation ....................................................................................................... 11 3. Short Range (2029) Background Peak Hour Operation ..........................................20 4. Long Range (2045) Background Peak Hour Operation...........................................21 5. Short Range (2029) Total Peak Hour Operation .....................................................23 6. Long Range (2045) Total Peak Hour Operation......................................................24 _//L--DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 7/ rASSOCIATES LIST OF FIGURES 1. Site Location .............................................................................................................3 2. Existing Intersection Geometry..................................................................................4 3. Recent Peak Hour Traffic..........................................................................................6 4. Recent Bicycle Volumes............................................................................................ 7 5. Recent Pedestrian Volumes......................................................................................8 6. Site Plan.................................................................................................................. 12 7. Trip Distribution ....................................................................................................... 13 8. Short Range (2029) Background Peak Hour Traffic................................................ 15 9. Long Range (2045) Background Peak Hour Traffic................................................. 16 10. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ........................................................................... 17 11 . Short Range (2029) Total Peak Hour Traffic........................................................... 18 12. Long Range (2045) Total Peak Hour Traffic............................................................ 19 13. Short Range (2029) and Long Range (2045) Geometry .........................................25 APPENDICES A. Base Assumptions form and related information B. Recent Peak Hour Traffic C. Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort Collins LOS Standards D. Short Range (2029) Background Peak Hour Operation E. Long Range (2045) Background Peak Hour Operation F. Short Range (2029) Total Peak Hour Operation G. Long Range (2045) Total Peak Hour Operation H. Pedestrian/Bicycle Level of Service _//L--DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 7/ rASSOCIATES I. INTRODUCTION This transportation impact study (TIS) addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed Prospect Plaza Student Housing. The proposed Prospect Plaza Student Housing site is located south of (adjacent to) Lake Street and east of Centre Avenue in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planning consultant (Tetrad Real Estate, LLC) and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering staff. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines contained in the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards" (LCUASS). The base assumptions packet is provided in Appendix A. The study involved the following steps: • Collect physical, traffic, and development data; • Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; • Determine peak hour traffic volumes; • Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; • Analyze signal warrants; • Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY IS NOT SIGNED/ STAMPED. THE FINAL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY WILL BE SIGNED/STAMPED REFLECTING COMMENTS FROM THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS. _//L--DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 7/ rASSOCIATES Page 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily institutional (CSU) or residential. Land adjacent to the site is flat (<2% grade) from a traffic operations perspective. This site is near the center of Fort Collins. Colorado State University and the Fort Collins CBD are north of the proposed Prospect Plaza Student Housing site. This site is adjacent to the CSU Campus. Roads The primary streets near the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site are Prospect Road, Centre Avenue, and Lake Street. Figure 2 shows a schematic of the existing geometry at the Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections. Prospect Road is to the south of (adjacent to) the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site. It is classified as a four-lane arterial street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, Prospect Road has a four-lane cross section in this area. At the Prospect/Centre intersection, Prospect Road has eastbound and westbound left-turn lanes and two through lanes in each direction. According to LCUASS, eastbound and westbound right-turn lanes are required with the existing traffic volumes at the Prospect/ Centre intersection. Typically, with constrained conditions, when turn lanes are shown to be required based on volumes, they are not built unless the operation at the subject intersection is determined to be unacceptable. The Prospect/Centre intersection has signal control. The posted speed limit in this area of Prospect Road is 35 mph. Centre Avenue is to the west of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site. In this area, it is a north-south street designated as a collector street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. It would be classified as a major collector street (without parking). Currently, it has a two-lane cross section with no center median lane north of Prospect Road. South of Prospect Road, Centre Avenue has a two-lane cross section with a center median lane. At the Prospect/Centre intersection, Centre Avenue has northbound and southbound left-turn lanes, one through lane in each direction, and northbound and southbound right-turn lanes. At the Centre/Lake intersection, Centre Avenue has all northbound movements combined into a single lane. The Centre/Lake intersection has stop sign control on all legs. The posted speed limit in this area of Centre Avenue is 35 mph, south of Prospect Road. There is no posted speed limit on Centre Avenue between Prospect Road and Lake Street. - ��—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -r J ASSOCIATES Page 2 CSU Ca m n 1j Prospect Plaza Student Housing 0 U Lake T' JG Prospect a� L U U) (D U) SPn^9 Creek Trail SCALE: 1"=1000' SITE LOCATION Figure 1 -or/ -DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -71 [-ASSOCIATES Page 3 UN O� oSTOP Lake a� L - Denotes Lane _ Two-way Continuous Left-turn Lane L 29 >m >m p_ a 75'Striped Lane ® plus 75'Transition 100, 75'Striped Lane ® Prospect plus 75 Transition @a � a F-a a -o a �m U�m =o =o 30 �o LL N LL N a � a EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Figure 2 —or/ —DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -71 [—ASSOCIATES Page Lake Street is an east-west street designated as a collector street on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. It would be classified as a major collector street (without parking). Currently, Lake Street has a two-lane cross section with no center median lane. At the Centre/Lake intersection, Lake Street has all eastbound and westbound movements combined into single lanes. The posted speed limit in this area of Lake Street is 25 mph. Existing Traffic Figure 3 shows the recent morning and afternoon peak hour traffic counts at the Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections. Recent count data at the Prospect/ Centre and Centre/Lake intersections was obtained in April 2024. Raw count data is provided in Appendix B. Figures 4 and 5 respectively show the recent bicycle and pedestrian volumes at the Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections. Existing Operation The Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition. Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 3, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. The Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections meet the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standard during the morning and afternoon peak hours with existing control, geometry, and signal timing. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix C. The Prospect Plaza Student Housing is in an area termed "mixed-use district." In areas termed "mixed-use districts," acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service E or better for the overall intersection, and level of service E or better for any leg or movement. At arterial/arterial and collector/collector stop sign controlled intersections, acceptable operation is considered to be at level of service E, overall and level of service F, for any approach leg. At arterial/collector, arterial/local, collector/local, and local/local stop sign controlled intersections, acceptable operation is considered to be at level of service D, overall and level of service F, for any approach leg. It is important to note that the bicycle and pedestrian volumes were used in the operational analysis of the Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections. However, the bicycle and pedestrian inputs had very little impact to the calculated operation of the intersections. During the peak hour traffic counts, the operation at the Centre/Lake intersection was specifically observed. This was done since there is a high number of pedestrians/ bicycles crossing Lake Street in the north/south direction. The following is a summary of the observations: 1) the pedestrians/bicycles seemed to cross in waves with gaps between the crossing waves; 2) the cars yielded to the waves of pedestrians/bicycles; - ��—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -r J ASSOCIATES Page 5 N f 122/204 29/90 127/166 — Lake 29/46 � r orn 't00 a� L U ---a- AM/PM 83/34 /1120 212 212/263 Prospect 63/31 813/984—► 59/65 m �M6') r N N RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 -or/l-DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -71 [—ASSOCIATES Page 6 xs _ a NU) m 00 LO Iol�o _ 9/0 5/8 0/5 5/1 � Lake 6/11 i 3/6 N a� L U ---a— AM/PM 0 0 0 0/0 1/0 Prospect 0/0 0/3- 0/0 0-0 O r O RECENT BICYCLE VOLUMES Figure 4 —or/l—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 —71 [—ASSOCIATES Page 7 06 _ a Nco co CO r -\ \- C.0�o M Lake 21/38 H N L U AM/PM 3/12 _ 00_ N a7 r Prospect 0/5 H RECENT PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES Figure 5 —or/l—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -71 [—ASSOCIATES Page 8 TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM EB LT A A EB T B B EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B B WB LT A A WB T A A WB T/RT A A WB APPROACH A A Prospect/Centre NB LT D D (signal) NB T D D N B RT D D NB APPROACH D D SB LT D D SB T D D SB RT D D SB APPROACH D D OVERALL B B NB LT/RT A A Centre/Lake EB T/RT A A (all-way stop sign) WB LT/T A B OVERALL A A �t—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -r 1 ASSOCIATES Page 9 3) the cars proceeded in the gaps between the pedestrian/bicycle waves; 4) the cars were not significantly delayed; 5) there were not long queues of cars on any of the approaches (2-3 cars); and 6) there did not appear to be frustration on the part of drivers (cars) or pedestrians/bicyclists. In general, the operation of all modes seemed to be very smooth. Pedestrian Facilities There are sidewalks along Prospect Road, Centre Avenue, and Lake Street. There are painted crosswalks on all legs of the Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections. Bicycle Facilities Bicycle lanes exist on Centre Avenue and Lake Street. Prospect Road has no bicycle lanes. Transit Facilities The nearest Transfort routes are Routes 2, 7, Around the Horn, and the MAX. The nearest bus stops are along Prospect Road, Whitcomb Street, Lake Street, and the Prospect Station for the MAX Route. -/,/ --DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 7/ rASSOCIATES Page 10 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Prospect Plaza Student Housing development is a student residential development with 814 beds (244 apartment dwelling units). Figure 6 shows a site plan of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing development. The site plan shows two accesses to/from Lake Street and one right-in/right-out access to/from Prospect Road. The Prospect Plaza Student Housing development will replace the existing Prospect Plaza Apartments. The short range analysis (Year 2029) includes development of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site and an appropriate increase in background traffic, due to normal growth, and other approved developments in the area. The long range analysis (Year 2045) includes background traffic due to normal growth and in general accordance with the Fort Collins Structure Plan. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 11th Edition, ITE is used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected use at a site. Off-Campus Student Apartment - Low- Rise (Code 226) was used as the land use. Table 2 shows the daily and peak hour trip generation for the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site. It is assumed that alternative modes (pedestrian, bicycle, and transit) have been considered in the ITE rates for student apartments. The trip generation of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing development resulted in 2,092 daily trip ends, 57 morning peak hour trip ends, and 170 afternoon peak hour trip ends. TABLE 2 Trip Generation Code Use Size AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out 226 Off-Campus Student 814 2.57 2092 0.07 26 0.07 31 0.21 80 0.21 90 Apartment(Mid-Rise) Beds 46% 54% 47% 53% Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site. Figure 7 shows the vehicle trip distribution used for the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site. The trip distribution was agreed to by City of Fort Collins staff in the scoping discussions. - �t—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -r J ASSOCIATES Page 11 411111 SCALE: 1"=100' LOT STATISTICS LOT ACREAGE:4.56 ACRES ; 4f y LOT DENSITY:2.54 5f `_-- — TOTAL GSF:493,785 GSF IMPERVIOUS:142,165 SF 73% W LAKE STREETPERVlOEJS:51,600 SF 27% TOTAL BUIDLING HEIGHT:55'-0" CONSTRUCTION TYPE:3A AND 1A UNIT TOTALS v war#' NUMBER OF UNIT&244 QQ NUMBER OF BEDS:814 HOUSING MIX I UNIT NUMBER NUMBER i TYPE OF UNITS OF BEDS s.nmo _ STUDIO 20 29 1 BEO 35 35 I 3 BED 30 90 4 BED 90 360 5 8ED 60 300 i TOTALS 244 814 1 L _..- T SF STUDIO 50D SF 14.500 RSF 1 BED 625 SF 21,875 RSF I 3 BED 1126 SF 33,750 RSF p 4 BED 1375 SF 123,750 RSF 5 BED 1560 SF 93,600 RSF BUILDING STATS A HOUSING GSF: 287,475 GSF I AMENITY GSF: 10,000 GSF COMMON GSF: 4,180 GSF I CIRCULATION: 51,250 GSF MECHJSUPPORT: 2,000 GSF • e "' TOTAL GSF: 354,905 GSF EFFICIE MC"Y: 81� CD - Q ►* '� PARKING STATS 1-- 1 ! STALLS/ GARAGE RATIO - r ! LEVEL SF 84 34,720 SF 0,25 116 34,720 SF 0.50 116 34,720 SF 0.75 116 34,720 SF w 1.00 W PROSPECT STREET 115 34,720 SF URFACE PARKING SF r - 10,246 SF --- �t — -- �� PARKING PROVIDED ^r NUMBER OF SURFACE STALLS: 52 NUMBER OF GARAGE STALLS: 548 TOTAL STALLS: 600 RATIO: 0.73 SITE PLAN Figure 6 —oor/1-DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 71 [-ASSOCIATES Page12 0 -0 7 7i N 15% Lake - a r � o 15% 173 E73 �Y, U 15% 6 _ Prospect o U LO 0 0 N SCALE: 1"=500' TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 7 J'f 1—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -7,f [—ASSOCIATES Page 13 Background Traffic Projections Figures 8 and 9 show the short range (2029) and long range (2045) background peak hour traffic projections at the key intersections. Traffic at the key intersections was increased at a rate of one percent per year for the short range (2029) and long range (2045) background traffic forecasts. Trip Assignment/Total Traffic Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Using the trip distribution shown in Figure 7, Figure 10 shows the assignment of the site generated peak hour vehicle traffic. The site generated vehicle traffic was combined with the background traffic to determine the total forecasted vehicle traffic at the key intersections. Figures 11 and 12 shows the short range (2029) and long range (2045) total peak hour vehicle traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The following signal warrants were evaluated at the Centre/Lake intersection: Warrant 3, Peak Hour and Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume. These signal warrants will not be met. As noted based upon observations and subsequent operational analyses, this intersection does and will meet the Fort Collins Level of Service Standards with all-way stop sign control. Operation Analysis Operation analyses were performed at the Prospect/Centre, Prospect/RT Access, Centre/Lake, Lake/West Access, and Lake/Main Access intersections. The operation analyses were conducted for the short range future, reflecting a year 2029 condition and for the long range future, reflecting a year 2045 condition. As mentioned earlier, the Prospect/Centre intersection was analyzed using the existing City signal timing. Using the short range (2029) background peak hour traffic volumes, the Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections operate as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections will meet the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standard. Using the long range (2045) background peak hour traffic volumes, the Prospect/ Centre and Centre/Lake intersections operate as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The Prospect/Centre and Centre/ Lake intersections will meet the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standard. _//t--DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 7/ rASSOCIATES Page 14 N —128/214 30/95 133/174 — Lake 30/48 � r rnti �QQ NIt �0) N L U ---a- AM/PM 0")NLO N v- 87/36 /1177 223 223/276 Prospect 66/33 854/1034—► 62/68 m o orn CO CO L0 C0- T 1 SHORT RANGE (2029) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8 -or/l-DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -71 [—ASSOCIATES Page 15 4 N f 150/251 36/111 157/205 — Lake 36/57 rn� co CD rno a� L U ---a- AM/PM 0) N LO 102/42 —722/1380 261/32461 24 Prospect 78/38 1002/1213—► 73/80 M M m LOCON T Co N LONG RANGE (2045) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 9 -or/l-DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -71 [-ASSOCIATES Page 16 N f 5/13 --m—20/59 —1/4 17/52 �1/4 �11/36 4/12 — � Lake 12/35 — � r 1/2 — 1/4 12/35 f� CO N m O N N� LnN m O Co N N N N N U U U U Q a L U AM/PM U U Q C\1 coN 1/3 Cl) vvrn 1/2 N J ,L —1/1 - 1/3 4/12 9/27 — Prospect N SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 10 —or/l—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 77,1 [—ASSOCIATES Page 17 4� f 133/227 -178/368 —159/313 47/147 �1/4 �11/36 137/186 — � � Lake 239/266 — � r 228/233 — 30/48 1/4 12/35 d7� CoN O 0 <n00 N� LnN Nm OCo It O N N N N N U U U U Q a U (D L U AM/PM U) U U Q O —ItN N v N 88/39 N — /1179 224 1 224/277 � —927/1492 70/45 1119/1454 — Prospect 854/1034— 62/68 0 CO CO ��� N SHORT RANGE (2029) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 11 —or/l—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -71 [—ASSOCIATES Page 18 I& N f 163/264 214/421 —195/366 53/163 �1/4 �11/36 161/217 � Lake 279/307 � r 268/274 36/57 1/4 12/35 d7� CON CAO CflO N� LnN OCO ct N N N N N U U U U Q a U (D L U AM/PM U) U U Q N MCO•— N�N -103/4582 Cl) 262/325 262/325 1/1 /r —1086/1749 82/50 1310/1701 — Prospect 1002/1213— 73/80 rn CO LOCON —CO N LONG RANGE (2045) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 12 —or/l—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -71 [—ASSOCIATES Page 19 TABLE 3 Short Range (2029) Background Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM EB LT A A EB T B B EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B B WB LT A B WB T A A WB T/RT A A WB APPROACH A B Prospect/Centre NB LT D D (signal) NB T D D N B RT D D NB APPROACH D D SB LT D D SB T D D SB RT D D SB APPROACH D D OVERALL B B NB LT/RT A A Centre/Lake EB T/RT A A (all-way stop sign) WB LT/T A B OVERALL A B - ��—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -r J ASSOCIATES Page 20 TABLE 4 Long Range (2045) Background Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM EB LT A A EB T B B EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B B WB LT B C WB T A B WB T/RT A B WB APPROACH B B Prospect/Centre NB LT D D (signal) NB T D D N B RT D D NB APPROACH D D SB LT D D SB T D D SB RT D D SB APPROACH D D OVERALL B C NB LT/RT A A Centre/Lake EB T/RT A B (all-way stop sign) WB LT/T A B OVERALL A B - ��—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -r J ASSOCIATES Page 21 Using the short range (2029) total peak hour traffic volumes, the Prospect/ Centre, Prospect/RT Access, Centre/Lake, Lake/West Access, and Lake/Main Access intersections operate as indicated in Table 5. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The key intersections will meet the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standard. Using the long range (2045) total peak hour traffic volumes, the Prospect/Centre, Prospect/RT Access, Centre/Lake, Lake/West Access, and Lake/Main Access intersections operate as indicated in Table 6. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix G. The key intersections will meet the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standard. Geometry The short range (2029) and long range (2045) geometry is shown in Figure 13. The geometry at the Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections is the existing geometry. As mentioned earlier, according to LCUASS, eastbound and westbound right-turn lanes at the Prospect/Centre intersection are required with the existing traffic volumes. Typically at constrained locations, when turn lanes are shown to be required based on volumes, they are not built unless the operation at the subject intersection is determined to be unacceptable. According to the "West Central Area Plan" (adopted March 17, 2015), the right- of-way of Lake Street will be widened to 75 feet from the existing 60 foot right-of-way. The additional right-of-way will be on the north side of West Lake Street. A "planted buffer" will shield the bike lanes and sidewalks from the roadway. This project will install the sidewalk along its frontage. The new cross section of West Lake Street will be constructed by CSU. It is assumed that the unique function and design of Lake Street will not include any auxiliary turn lanes at driveways along it. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix H shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site. The Prospect Plaza Student Housing site is located within an area termed as "pedestrian district," which sets the level of service threshold at LOS A for all measured factors, except for Street Crossing which is LOS B. There are five destination areas within 1320 feet of the proposed Prospect Plaza Student Housing site: 1) the CSU Campus, 2) the CSU student housing to the west of the site, 3) the CSU student housing to the southwest of the site, 4) the commercial uses to the south of the site, and 5) the commercial uses to the southeast of the site. There are sidewalks along all streets in the area of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site. Sidewalks will be built throughout and adjacent to the development that will connect to existing nearby sidewalks along Prospect Road, Centre Avenue, and Lake Street. _/,/ --DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 7/ rASSOCIATES Page 22 TABLE 5 Short Range (2029) Total Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM EB LT A A EB T B B EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B B WB LT A B WB T A B WB T/RT A B WB APPROACH A B Prospect/Centre NB LT D D (signal) NB T D D N B RT D D NB APPROACH D D SB LT D D SB T D D SB RT D D SB APPROACH D D OVERALL B B Prospect/RT Access SB RT B C (RT-in/RT-out) NB LT/RT A A Centre/Lake EB T/RT A A (all-way stop sign) WB LT/T A B OVERALL A B NB LT/RT B B Lake/West Access WB LT A A (stop sign) OVERALL A A NB LT/RT B C Lake/Main Access WB LT A A (stop sign) OVERALL A A - ��—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -r J ASSOCIATES Page 23 TABLE 6 Long Range (2045) Total Peak Hour Operation Intersection Movement Level of Service AM PM EB LT A B EB T B B EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B B WB LT B C WB T A B WB T/RT A B WB APPROACH B B Prospect/Centre NB LT D D (signal) NB T D D NB RT D D NB APPROACH D D SB LT D D SB T D D SB RT D D SB APPROACH D D OVERALL B C Prospect/RT Access SB RT B C (RT-in/RT-out) NB LT/RT A B Centre/Lake EB T/RT A B (all-way stop sign) WB LT/T B C OVERALL A B NB LT/RT B B Lake/West Access WB LT A A (stop sign) OVERALL A A NB LT/RT B C Lake/Main Access WB LT A A (stop sign) OVERALL A A - �t—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -r J ASSOCIATES Page 24 N OSTOP Lake � 1U)< � STOP a - Denotes Lane _ Two-way Continuous Left-turn Lane U U Q d01S � ® Prospect SHORT RANGE (2029) AND LONG RANGE (2045) GEOMETRY Figure 13 —or/l—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -71 [—ASSOCIATES Page 25 • Directness — The distance ratio to all pedestrian destinations is less than 1.2 (LOS A). • Continuity — The continuity to all pedestrian destinations will be acceptable at LOS B, since there are existing sidewalks adjacent to all the destination areas. • Street Crossings — The street crossings will be acceptable at LOS B all destination areas. • Visual Interest and Amenity — The visual interest and amenity will be acceptable at LOS A for all destination areas since this area around the CSU Campus is an enhanced pedestrian area. • Security— The security is acceptable at LOS A for all destination areas since this area around the CSU Campus is an enhanced pedestrian area. Bicycle Level of Service Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there is one destination area (CSU) within 1320 feet of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing. The bicycle level of service is acceptable. The bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix H. There will be bicycle storage facilities on site. Transit Level of Service The nearest Transfort Routes are Routes 2, 7, 19, and 32 at the Prospect/Centre intersection and Around the Horn at the Prospect/Centre intersection. According to the "West Central Area Plan," there will be transit stops on Lake Street and Prospect Road in the future. --//t—DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 -r J ASSOCIATES Page 26 IV. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS This study assessed the impacts of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing development on the short range (2029) and long range (2045) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: • The development of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site will generate approximately 2,092 daily trip ends, 57 morning peak hour trip ends, and 170 afternoon peak hour vehicle trip ends. • Current operation at the Prospect/Centre and Centre/Lake intersections meets the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standard. • The following signal warrants were evaluated at the Centre/Lake intersection: Warrant 3, Peak Hour and Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume. These signal warrants will not be met. As noted based upon observations and subsequent operational analyses, this intersection does and will meet the Fort Collins Level of Service Standards with all-way stop sign control. • In the short range (2029) future, given development of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will meet the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standard with existing/ recommended control, geometry, and existing signal timing. • In the long range (2045) future, given development of the Prospect Plaza Student Housing site and an increase in background traffic, the key intersections will meet the City of Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standard with existing/ recommended control, geometry, and existing signal timing. • The geometry at the key intersections is shown in Figure 13. The new cross section of Lake Street will be in accordance with the "West Central Area Plan." • Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrians and bicycles based upon the measures in the multi-modal transportation guidelines. _//L--DELICH Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS, May 2024 7/ rASSOCIATES Page 27 APPENDIX A Chapter4 — Attachments Attachment A Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions Project Information Project Name PRo9PEGT 2-A-WA Project Location o s PE p t✓ S r f` EAIY 6 v TIS Assumptions Type of Study Full: Y�s Intermediate: MTIS: N� Memo: No Study Area Boundaries North: I-AKG- South: East: St TE btPtvCroMY9 West: C&,V-rcg Study Years• Short Range: Z o2 of Long Range: 20 4 Future Traffic Growth Rate l 1 Peg Year- Study Intersections 1. All access drives 5. 2. AC09P&CT 00,urr s- 6. 3' LAK6 CEivr,e 7. 4. g• Time Period for Study : 7:0 -9: :00- : Sat Noon: n/p Trip Generation Rates E `I`9, (( -'p. - ,QTTriGcdEf7 Trip Adjustment Factors Passby: V14 Captive Market: N A Overall Trip Distribution SEE ATTACHED SKETCH Mode Split Assumptions /.] AA)AL 9 Sf S Design Vehicle Information PSgeVQ&K CARS Committed Roadway Improvements ^/OT AwARG ®P AAIV Other Traffic Studies Nor . wAR6 OF AVY Areas Requiring Special Study Date: MAU14 14 . Z ©Z4- Traffic Engineer: D&La cN o4 B S©C f A Te s Local Entity Engineer: 04o9 8dP: Ladner County Urban Area Street Standards—Repealed and Reenacted August t,2021 Page 4-35 Adopted by Ladmer County,City of Loveland,City of Fort CoNins x xx a$ 8 io R�88 rOeB Iz. I �����3 �aaa�g� nF4u ato ammo® p W 3 , �.n Ea 7W __�M, m € s Qw n 6� _ � Q� w — 442c� Y� N i LU J LU W B J A' w Z O t= IL o Oak am I J Y V I 1 N y I �� TABLE 1 Trip Generation Code Use size AWDTE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate Trlpa Rate In Rate Out Rate In Rate Out 226 Off-Campus Student 814 beds 2.57 2092 0.07 0.07 31 0.21 0.21 90 Apartment(Mid-Rise) 46% 54% 47% 53% • r ^x � 3 T c o - ' �� �"` � ,�„ _. �. � • dam° u 167, Al Fes' !�� :}-#►1k�1i 517E � � .- • � m '*� -f �_�:' ISO o7 Aa 3 TRto DIBTR70VTION APPENDIX B DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND,CO 80538 Phone: 970 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 41412024 Observer: Vickie Day: Thursday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R=right turn Intersection: Centre/Lake S=straight L=left turn Time Northbound: Centre Southbound: Total Eastbound: Lake Westbound: Lake Total Total Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All 7:00 2 15 17 0 17 8 4 12 11 12 23 35 52 7:15 3 16 19 0 19 26 3 29 6 13 19 48 67 7:30 7 27 34 0 34 39 8 47 16 24 40 87 121 7:45 5 25 30 0 30 46 7 53 13 24 37 90 120 8:00 6 20 26 0 26 22 8 30 3 21 24 54 80 i 15 6 21 27 0 27 26 7 33 5 21 26 59 86 30459 27 36 0 36 46 10 56 9 29 38 94t 130 19 21 40 0 1 40 33 4 37 12 51 63 1 100 1 140 8:00-9:00 40 0 89 129 0 0 0 0 129 0 127 29 156 29 122 0 151 307 436 PHF 0.53 nla 0.82 0.81 nla nla nla nla 0.81 nla 0.69 0.73 0.7 0.6 0.6 nla 0.6 0.77 0.78 4:00 9 14 23 0 23 31 17 48 15 52 67 115 138 4:15 13 16 29 0 29 33 5 38 19 55 74 112 141 4:30 18 13 31 0 31 32 13 45 18 50 68 113 144 4:45 12 10 22 0 22 49 20 69 25 50 75 144 166 5:00 13 15 28 0 28 52 8 60 28 49 77 137 165 5:15 3 10 13 0 13 29 12 41 27 46 73 114 127 5:30 18 9 27 0 27 28 4 32 10 47 57 89 116 5:45 10 3 13 0 13 24 5 29 12 44 56 1 85 1 98 4:15-5:15 56 0 54 110 0 0 0 0 110 0 166 46 212 90 204 0 294 506 616 PHF 0.78 nla 0.84 0.89 1 nla nla nla nla 0.89 nla 0.8 0.58 0.77 1 0.8 1 0.93 1 nla 0.95 0.88 0.93 DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND,CO 80538 Phone: 970 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 41312024 Observer: Vickie Day: Wednesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R=right turn Intersection: Prospect/Centre S=straight L=left turn Time Northbound: Centre Southbound: Centre Total Eastbound: Prospect Westbound: Prospect Total Total Begins L S R Total L S R Total north/south L S R Total L S R Total east/west All 7:00 1 10 28 39 0 5 3 8 47 8 123 5 136 36 52 2 90 226 273 7:15 1 16 23 40 0 6 5 11 51 7 148 14 169 31 67 8 106 275 326 7:30 7 23 55 85 1 4 3 8 93 9 211 13 233 41 116 13 170 403 496 7:45 3 32 69 104 3 15 5 23 127 16 222 17 255 78 147 18 243 498 625 8:00 10 28 65 103 1 7 3 11 114 6 174 16 196 56 142 16 214 410 524 8:15 10 26 46 82 3 12 3 18 100 11 198 10 219 43 121 17 181 400 500 8:30 12 31 56 99 3 11 5 19 118 23 213 12 248 55 158 32 245 493 611 8:45 16 47 62 125 7 11 8 26 1 151 23 228 21 272 58 165 18 241 1 513 664 8:00-9:00 48 132 229 409 14 41 19 74 483 63 813 59 935 212 586 83 881 1816 2299 PHF 0.75 0.7 0.88 0.82 0.5 0.85 0.59 0.71 0.8 0.68 0.89 0.7 0.86 0.91 0.89 0.65 0.9 0.88 0.87 4:00 23 15 86 124 15 34 27 76 200 8 213 16 237 68 257 8 333 570 770 4:15 18 21 91 130 14 28 17 59 189 6 225 17 248 48 267 3 318 566 755 4:30 22 14 84 120 10 23 16 49 169 5 238 16 259 66 267 15 348 607 776 4:45 10 17 80 107 17 30 16 63 170 16 273 15 304 65 284 8 357 661 831 5:00 14 15 67 96 11 40 17 68 164 4 248 17 269 84 302 8 394 663 827 5:15 14 11 63 88 10 24 16 50 138 3 216 13 232 57 289 4 350 582 720 5:30 20 15 50 85 12 22 16 50 135 4 231 11 246 47 288 6 341 587 722 5:45 9 9 55 73 6 8 7 21 94 3 224 8 235 37 213 5 255 490 1 584 4:15-5:15 64 67 322 453 52 121 66 239 692 31 984 65 1080 263 1120 34 1417 2497 3189 PHF 0.73 0.8 0.88 0.87 1 0.76 1 0.76 0.97 0.88 1 0.92 0.48 0.9 1 0.96 0.89 0.78 0.93 0.57 0.9 0.94 0.96 APPENDIX C HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Recent AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT# tT t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 63 813 59 212 586 83 48 132 229 14 41 19 Future Volume(veh/h) 63 813 59 212 586 83 48 132 229 14 41 19 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.75 0.71 0.84 0.71 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 72 934 63 244 674 87 55 152 64 16 47 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 542 2123 143 475 2092 270 219 322 195 163 322 195 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.63 0.63 0.08 0.66 0.66 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 3371 227 1781 3154 407 1020 1870 1133 982 1870 1133 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 72 492 505 244 379 382 55 152 64 16 47 5 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1777 1821 1781 1777 1783 1020 1870 1133 982 1870 1133 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.5 15.6 15.6 4.9 10.1 10.1 5.3 8.1 5.5 1.6 2.3 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.5 15.6 15.6 4.9 10.1 10.1 7.7 8.1 5.5 9.7 2.3 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 542 1119 1147 475 1179 1183 219 322 195 163 322 195 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.44 0.44 0.51 0.32 0.32 0.25 0.47 0.33 0.10 0.15 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 581 1119 1147 568 1179 1183 317 502 304 257 502 304 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 6.4 10.4 10.4 7.4 7.9 7.9 41.9 41.0 39.9 45.4 38.6 37.8 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.1 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.6 1.1 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.5 6.0 6.1 1.6 3.7 3.7 1.4 3.8 1.6 0.4 1.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.5 11.7 11.7 8.2 8.6 8.6 42.5 42.1 40.9 45.6 38.8 37.9 LnGrp LOS A B B A A A D D D D D D Approach Vol,veh/h 1069 1005 271 68 Approach Delay,s/veh 11.3 8.5 41.9 40.4 Approach LOS B A D D Timer-Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 23.5 12.3 74.3 23.5 8.6 78.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 28.5 13.0 52.0 28.5 6.0 59.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 11.7 6.9 17.6 10.1 3.5 12.1 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.2 0.4 3.7 0.9 0.0 2.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.4 HCM 6th LOS B Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report recent am.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Recent AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect 1 'r t ♦- Phase Number 2 3 4 6 7 8 Movement SBTL WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max Maximum Split(s) 34 18 58 34 11 65 Maximum Split(%) 30.9% 16.4% 52.7% 30.9% 10.0% 59.1% Minimum Split(s) 23.5 11 26 24.5 11 25 Yellow Time(s) 3 5 4 4 5 4 All-Red Time(s) 2.5 0 2 1.5 0 2 Minimum Initial(s) 7 4 10 7 4 10 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time(s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 13 11 11 Dual Entry Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time(s) 79 3 21 79 3 14 End Time(s) 3 21 79 3 14 79 Yield/Force Off(s) 107.5 16 73 107.5 9 73 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 96.5 16 60 96.5 9 62 Local Start Time(s) 6 40 58 6 40 51 Local Yield(s) 34.5 53 0 34.5 46 0 Local Yield 170(s) 23.5 53 97 23.5 46 99 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 65 Offset:73(66%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL,Start of Yellow Splits and Phases: 84:Centre/Center&Prospect 1 02 4_�3 -iG3 i`R t06 F 07 �73 R' Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report recent am.syn Queues Recent AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 72 1002 244 769 55 152 263 16 47 22 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.50 0.58 0.36 0.26 0.52 0.74 0.14 0.16 0.06 Control Delay 5.6 14.8 10.3 9.9 40.5 47.1 22.5 38.6 37.9 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.6 14.8 10.3 9.9 40.5 47.1 22.5 38.6 37.9 0.3 Queue Length 50th(ft) 11 197 43 122 34 98 31 10 29 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 30 320 90 194 63 142 105 27 54 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 512 584 555 529 Turn Bay Length(ft) 225 225 135 135 180 150 Base Capacity(vph) 497 1986 454 2153 354 482 450 192 482 503 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.50 0.54 0.36 0.16 0.32 0.58 0.08 0.10 0.04 Intersection Summary Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report recent am.syn HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Recent PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ tT t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 31 984 59 263 1120 34 64 67 322 52 121 66 Future Volume(veh/h) 31 984 59 263 1120 34 64 67 322 52 121 66 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.88 0.80 0.85 0.80 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 32 1025 58 274 1167 34 67 70 41 54 126 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 370 2225 126 460 2465 72 167 296 202 197 296 202 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.65 0.65 0.08 0.70 0.70 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 3412 193 1781 3525 103 1096 1870 1275 1093 1870 1275 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 32 534 549 274 588 613 67 70 41 54 126 11 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1777 1828 1781 1777 1851 1096 1870 1275 1093 1870 1275 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.7 17.9 17.9 5.5 17.9 17.9 7.1 3.9 3.4 5.5 7.3 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 0.7 17.9 17.9 5.5 17.9 17.9 14.3 3.9 3.4 9.4 7.3 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 370 1158 1192 460 1242 1294 167 296 202 197 296 202 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.60 0.47 0.47 0.40 0.24 0.20 0.27 0.43 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 420 1158 1192 678 1242 1294 318 553 377 348 553 377 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 6.8 10.4 10.4 8.1 8.1 8.1 52.1 44.2 43.9 48.3 45.6 42.9 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.1 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.3 6.9 7.1 1.9 6.5 6.8 2.0 1.8 1.1 1.5 3.5 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.9 11.7 11.7 9.3 9.4 9.4 53.6 44.6 44.4 49.0 46.6 43.0 LnGrp LOS A B B A A A D D D D D D Approach Vol,veh/h 1115 1475 178 191 Approach Delay,s/veh 11.6 9.4 48.0 47.1 Approach LOS B A D D Timer-Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 23.5 13.3 83.2 23.5 7.6 88.9 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 34.5 23.0 46.0 34.5 6.0 63.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 11.4 7.5 19.9 16.3 2.7 19.9 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.6 0.8 4.1 0.6 0.0 4.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.9 HCM 6th LOS B Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report recent pm.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Recent PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect 1 'r t ♦— Phase Number 2 3 4 6 7 8 Movement SBTL WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max Maximum Split(s) 40 28 52 40 11 69 Maximum Split(%) 33.3% 23.3% 43.3% 33.3% 9.2% 57.5% Minimum Split(s) 23.5 11 26 24 11 25 Yellow Time(s) 3 5 4 4 5 4 All-Red Time(s) 2.5 0 2 1.5 0 2 Minimum Initial(s) 7 4 10 7 4 10 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time(s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 13 11 11 Dual Entry Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time(s) 16 56 84 16 56 67 End Time(s) 56 84 16 56 67 16 Yield/Force Off(s) 50.5 79 10 50.5 62 10 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 39.5 79 117 39.5 62 119 Local Start Time(s) 6 46 74 6 46 57 Local Yield(s) 40.5 69 0 40.5 52 0 Local Yield 170(s) 29.5 69 107 29.5 52 109 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 65 Offset: 10(8%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL,Start of Yellow Splits and Phases: 84:Centre/Center&Prospect 1 02 ve-o3 --1"04 R' t06 "0703 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report recent pm.syn Queues Recent PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 32 1086 274 1202 67 70 335 54 126 69 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.57 0.58 0.51 0.48 0.27 0.73 0.37 0.49 0.22 Control Delay 6.5 19.3 11.1 9.9 57.0 46.5 15.3 51.5 52.8 2.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.5 19.3 11.1 9.9 57.0 46.5 15.3 51.5 52.8 2.6 Queue Length 50th(ft) 5 273 49 231 47 48 5 38 89 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 15 441 127 343 90 87 97 74 142 8 Internal Link Dist(ft) 674 585 555 522 Turn Bay Length(ft) 225 225 135 135 180 150 Base Capacity(vph) 338 1903 527 2371 293 532 599 307 532 530 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.57 0.52 0.51 0.23 0.13 0.56 0.18 0.24 0.13 Intersection Summary Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report recent pm.syn HCM 6th AWSC Recent AM 1: Center & Lake Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 8.6 Intersection LOS A Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* *T y Traffic Vol,veh/h 127 29 29 122 40 89 Future Vol,veh/h 127 29 29 122 40 89 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 149 34 34 144 47 105 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.8 8.4 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 Vol Left,% 31% 0% 19% Vol Thru,% 0% 81% 81% Vol Right, % 69% 19% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 129 156 151 LT Vol 40 0 29 Through Vol 0 127 122 RT Vol 89 29 0 Lane Flow Rate 152 184 178 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util(X) 0.185 0.223 0.223 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.392 4.367 4.518 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 818 822 796 Service Time 2.417 2.39 2.541 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.186 0.224 0.224 HCM Control Delay 8.4 8.6 8.8 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 0.9 0.9 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report recent am.syn HCM 6th AWSC Recent PM 1: Center & Lake Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 9.8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* *T y Traffic Vol,veh/h 166 46 90 204 56 54 Future Vol,veh/h 166 46 90 204 56 54 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 178 49 97 219 60 58 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 9.2 10.6 9 HCM LOS A B A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 Vol Left,% 51% 0% 31% Vol Thru,% 0% 78% 69% Vol Right, % 49% 22% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 110 212 294 LT Vol 56 0 90 Through Vol 0 166 204 RT Vol 54 46 0 Lane Flow Rate 118 228 316 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util(X) 0.163 0.282 0.399 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.948 4.451 4.54 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 723 807 793 Service Time 2.993 2.484 2.572 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.163 0.283 0.398 HCM Control Delay 9 9.2 10.6 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.2 1.9 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report recent pm.syn UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level-of-Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A < 10 B > 10 and < 15 c > 15 and < 25 D > 25 and < 35 E > 35 and < 50 F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level-of-Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A < 10 B > 10 and < 20 c > 20 and < 35 D > 35 and < 55 E > 55 and < 80 F > 80 Table 4-2 Fort Collins (GMA and City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) Overall Any Any Approach Leg Movement Signalized D' E E2 Unsignalized E3 F4 Arterial/Arterial Collector/Collector Unsignalized D3 F4 Arterial/Collector Arterial/Local Collector/Local Local/Local Roundabout E3,5 E5,4 E5 ' In mixed use district including downtown as defined by structure plan,overall LOS E is acceptable 2 Applicable with at least 5%of total entering volume 3 Use weighed average to identify overall delay 4 Mitigation may be required 5 Apply unsignalized delay value thresholds to determine LOS APPENDIX D HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Short Bkgrd AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ tT t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 66 854 62 223 616 87 50 139 241 15 43 20 Future Volume(veh/h) 66 854 62 223 616 87 50 139 241 15 43 20 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.76 0.71 0.85 0.71 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 76 982 66 256 708 92 57 160 82 17 49 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 524 2115 142 459 2089 271 219 323 195 157 323 195 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.63 0.63 0.08 0.66 0.66 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 3372 227 1781 3151 409 1019 1870 1133 969 1870 1133 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 76 517 531 256 399 401 57 160 82 17 49 6 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1777 1822 1781 1777 1783 1019 1870 1133 969 1870 1133 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.6 16.8 16.8 5.1 10.7 10.8 5.5 8.5 7.1 1.8 2.4 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.6 16.8 16.8 5.1 10.7 10.8 8.0 8.5 7.1 10.3 2.4 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 524 1115 1143 459 1178 1182 219 323 195 157 323 195 V/C Ratio(X) 0.15 0.46 0.46 0.56 0.34 0.34 0.26 0.50 0.42 0.11 0.15 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 562 1115 1143 547 1178 1182 316 502 304 250 502 304 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 6.5 10.8 10.8 8.0 8.1 8.1 42.1 41.2 40.6 45.8 38.7 37.9 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.1 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.6 1.2 1.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.6 6.5 6.6 1.7 4.0 4.0 1.4 4.0 2.0 0.4 1.2 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.7 12.2 12.1 9.1 8.8 8.8 42.7 42.4 42.0 46.1 38.9 37.9 LnGrp LOS A B B A A A D D D D D D Approach Vol,veh/h 1124 1056 299 72 Approach Delay,s/veh 11.8 8.9 42.3 40.5 Approach LOS B A D D Timer-Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 23.5 12.5 74.0 23.5 8.6 77.9 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 28.5 13.0 52.0 28.5 6.0 59.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 12.3 7.1 18.8 10.5 3.6 12.8 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.2 0.4 4.0 1.1 0.0 2.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.0 HCM 6th LOS B Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report sb am.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Bkgrd AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect 1 'r t ♦- Phase Number 2 3 4 6 7 8 Movement SBTL WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max Maximum Split(s) 34 18 58 34 11 65 Maximum Split(%) 30.9% 16.4% 52.7% 30.9% 10.0% 59.1% Minimum Split(s) 23.5 11 26 24.5 11 25 Yellow Time(s) 3 5 4 4 5 4 All-Red Time(s) 2.5 0 2 1.5 0 2 Minimum Initial(s) 7 4 10 7 4 10 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time(s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 13 11 11 Dual Entry Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time(s) 79 3 21 79 3 14 End Time(s) 3 21 79 3 14 79 Yield/Force Off(s) 107.5 16 73 107.5 9 73 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 96.5 16 60 96.5 9 62 Local Start Time(s) 6 40 58 6 40 51 Local Yield(s) 34.5 53 0 34.5 46 0 Local Yield 170(s) 23.5 53 97 23.5 46 99 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 65 Offset:73(66%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL,Start of Yellow Splits and Phases: 84:Centre/Center&Prospect 1 02 4_�3 -iG3 i`R t06 F 07 �73 R' Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report sb am.syn Queues Short Bkgrd AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 76 1053 256 808 57 160 277 17 49 23 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.54 0.63 0.38 0.25 0.52 0.78 0.14 0.16 0.06 Control Delay 6.2 16.4 13.4 10.5 39.3 46.0 26.8 37.4 36.8 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.2 16.4 13.4 10.5 39.3 46.0 26.8 37.4 36.8 0.3 Queue Length 50th(ft) 12 224 45 130 35 104 45 10 30 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 33 342 106 206 63 145 124 27 55 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 512 584 555 529 Turn Bay Length(ft) 225 225 135 135 180 150 Base Capacity(vph) 469 1934 429 2133 354 482 444 189 482 503 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.54 0.60 0.38 0.16 0.33 0.62 0.09 0.10 0.05 Intersection Summary Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report sb am.syn HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Short Bkgrd PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT# tT t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 33 1034 68 276 1177 36 67 70 338 55 127 69 Future Volume(veh/h) 33 1034 68 276 1177 36 67 70 338 55 127 69 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.88 0.80 0.86 0.80 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 34 1077 68 288 1226 37 70 73 66 57 132 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 351 2197 139 442 2458 74 163 296 202 193 296 202 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.65 0.65 0.08 0.70 0.70 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 3387 214 1781 3521 106 1092 1870 1276 1074 1870 1276 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 34 565 580 288 618 645 70 73 66 57 132 14 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1777 1824 1781 1777 1850 1092 1870 1276 1074 1870 1276 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.7 19.7 19.7 5.9 19.3 19.4 7.4 4.1 5.5 5.9 7.7 1.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 0.7 19.7 19.7 5.9 19.3 19.4 15.1 4.1 5.5 10.0 7.7 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 351 1152 1183 442 1241 1292 163 296 202 193 296 202 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.49 0.49 0.65 0.50 0.50 0.43 0.25 0.33 0.29 0.45 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 400 1152 1183 654 1241 1292 313 553 377 341 553 377 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 7.1 10.9 10.9 9.4 8.4 8.4 52.6 44.2 44.8 48.6 45.7 43.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.1 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.8 0.4 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.3 7.6 7.8 2.2 7.1 7.4 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.6 3.7 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 7.2 12.4 12.3 11.0 9.8 9.8 54.4 44.7 45.8 49.5 46.8 43.1 LnGrp LOS A B B B A A D D D D D D Approach Vol,veh/h 1179 1551 209 203 Approach Delay,s/veh 12.2 10.0 48.3 47.3 Approach LOS B B D D Timer-Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 23.5 13.7 82.8 23.5 7.7 88.8 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 34.5 23.0 46.0 34.5 6.0 63.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 12.0 7.9 21.7 17.1 2.7 21.4 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.7 0.8 4.4 0.7 0.0 5.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.8 HCM 6th LOS B Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report sb pm.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Bkgrd PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect 1 'r t ♦— Phase Number 2 3 4 6 7 8 Movement SBTL WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max Maximum Split(s) 40 28 52 40 11 69 Maximum Split(%) 33.3% 23.3% 43.3% 33.3% 9.2% 57.5% Minimum Split(s) 23.5 11 26 24 11 25 Yellow Time(s) 3 5 4 4 5 4 All-Red Time(s) 2.5 0 2 1.5 0 2 Minimum Initial(s) 7 4 10 7 4 10 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time(s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 13 11 11 Dual Entry Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time(s) 16 56 84 16 56 67 End Time(s) 56 84 16 56 67 16 Yield/Force Off(s) 50.5 79 10 50.5 62 10 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 39.5 79 117 39.5 62 119 Local Start Time(s) 6 46 74 6 46 57 Local Yield(s) 40.5 69 0 40.5 52 0 Local Yield 170(s) 29.5 69 107 29.5 52 109 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 70 Offset: 10(8%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL,Start of Yellow Splits and Phases: 84:Centre/Center&Prospect 1 02 ve-o3 --1"04 R' t06 "0703 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report sb pm.syn Queues Short Bkgrd PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 34 1148 288 1264 70 73 352 57 132 72 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.63 0.62 0.54 0.49 0.27 0.77 0.37 0.50 0.22 Control Delay 7.5 22.7 15.8 10.9 56.5 45.6 18.3 50.6 51.9 3.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.5 22.7 15.8 10.9 56.5 45.6 18.3 50.6 51.9 3.0 Queue Length 50th(ft) 5 311 61 251 50 50 19 40 94 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 17 522 171 401 91 87 118 76 144 9 Internal Link Dist(ft) 674 585 555 522 Turn Bay Length(ft) 225 225 135 135 180 150 Base Capacity(vph) 315 1820 506 2348 287 532 596 307 532 530 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.63 0.57 0.54 0.24 0.14 0.59 0.19 0.25 0.14 Intersection Summary Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report sb pm.syn HCM 6th AWSC Short Bkgrd AM 1: Center & Lake Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 8.8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* *T y Traffic Vol,veh/h 133 30 30 128 42 94 Future Vol,veh/h 133 30 30 128 42 94 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 156 35 35 151 49 111 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 8.8 9 8.5 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 Vol Left,% 31% 0% 19% Vol Thru,% 0% 82% 81% Vol Right, % 69% 18% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 136 163 158 LT Vol 42 0 30 Through Vol 0 133 128 RT Vol 94 30 0 Lane Flow Rate 160 192 186 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util(X) 0.197 0.234 0.235 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.428 4.399 4.547 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 810 817 790 Service Time 2.457 2.427 2.575 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.198 0.235 0.235 HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.8 9 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 0.9 0.9 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/16/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report sb am.syn HCM 6th AWSC Short Bkgrd PM 1: Center & Lake Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 10.1 Intersection LOS B Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* #1 y Traffic Vol,veh/h 174 48 95 214 59 57 Future Vol,veh/h 174 48 95 214 59 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 187 52 102 230 63 61 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 9.4 10.9 9.1 HCM LOS A B A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 Vol Left,% 51% 0% 31% Vol Thru,% 0% 78% 69% Vol Right, % 49% 22% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 116 222 309 LT Vol 59 0 95 Through Vol 0 174 214 RT Vol 57 48 0 Lane Flow Rate 125 239 332 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util(X) 0.174 0.298 0.422 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.008 4.489 4.572 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 713 797 787 Service Time 3.059 2.529 2.609 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.175 0.3 0.422 HCM Control Delay 9.1 9.4 10.9 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.3 2.1 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report sb pm.syn APPENDIX E HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Long Bkgrd AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ tT t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 78 1002 73 261 722 102 59 163 282 17 51 23 Future Volume(veh/h) 78 1002 73 261 722 102 59 163 282 17 51 23 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.76 0.72 0.88 0.72 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 87 1113 77 290 802 104 66 181 145 19 57 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 478 2084 144 420 2085 270 215 323 196 143 323 196 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.62 0.62 0.09 0.66 0.66 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 3365 233 1781 3151 409 1019 1870 1134 923 1870 1134 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 87 587 603 290 452 454 66 181 145 19 57 9 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1777 1820 1781 1777 1783 1019 1870 1134 923 1870 1134 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.9 20.7 20.7 5.9 12.7 12.7 6.5 9.8 13.3 2.1 2.9 0.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.9 20.7 20.7 5.9 12.7 12.7 9.4 9.8 13.3 11.9 2.9 0.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 478 1101 1128 420 1176 1180 215 323 196 143 323 196 V/C Ratio(X) 0.18 0.53 0.53 0.69 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.56 0.74 0.13 0.18 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 515 1101 1128 495 1176 1180 312 502 304 231 502 304 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 6.9 11.9 11.9 11.2 8.4 8.4 42.8 41.7 43.2 47.1 38.8 37.9 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.2 1.9 1.8 3.3 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.5 5.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 8.0 8.2 2.8 4.7 4.7 1.7 4.6 4.0 0.5 1.4 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 7.1 13.7 13.7 14.4 9.4 9.4 43.6 43.2 48.6 47.5 39.1 38.0 LnGrp LOS A B B B A A D D D D D D Approach Vol,veh/h 1277 1196 392 85 Approach Delay,s/veh 13.3 10.6 45.3 40.9 Approach LOS B B D D Timer-Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 23.5 13.4 73.1 23.5 8.7 77.8 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 28.5 13.0 52.0 28.5 6.0 59.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 13.9 7.9 22.7 15.3 3.9 14.7 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.2 0.4 4.7 1.3 0.0 3.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.2 HCM 6th LOS B Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report lb am.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Long Bkgrd AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect 1 'r t ♦- Phase Number 2 3 4 6 7 8 Movement SBTL WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max Maximum Split(s) 34 18 58 34 11 65 Maximum Split(%) 30.9% 16.4% 52.7% 30.9% 10.0% 59.1% Minimum Split(s) 23.5 11 26 24.5 11 25 Yellow Time(s) 3 5 4 4 5 4 All-Red Time(s) 2.5 0 2 1.5 0 2 Minimum Initial(s) 7 4 10 7 4 10 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time(s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 13 11 11 Dual Entry Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time(s) 79 3 21 79 3 14 End Time(s) 3 21 79 3 14 79 Yield/Force Off(s) 107.5 16 73 107.5 9 73 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 96.5 16 60 96.5 9 62 Local Start Time(s) 6 40 58 6 40 51 Local Yield(s) 34.5 53 0 34.5 46 0 Local Yield 170(s) 23.5 53 97 23.5 46 99 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 75 Offset:73(66%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL,Start of Yellow Splits and Phases: 84:Centre/Center&Prospect 1 02 4_�3 -iG3 i`R t06 F 07 �73 R' Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report lb am.syn Queues Long Bkgrd AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 87 1194 290 915 66 181 313 19 57 26 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.68 0.76 0.44 0.26 0.52 0.86 0.14 0.16 0.07 Control Delay 7.8 22.5 29.1 12.6 37.4 43.6 39.5 35.4 34.8 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.8 22.5 29.1 12.6 37.4 43.6 39.5 35.4 34.8 0.3 Queue Length 50th(ft) 16 341 86 170 40 115 90 11 34 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 39 435 #255 255 74 169 #197 30 64 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 512 584 555 529 Turn Bay Length(ft) 225 225 135 135 180 150 Base Capacity(vph) 407 1750 383 2058 351 482 430 184 482 503 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.68 0.76 0.44 0.19 0.38 0.73 0.10 0.12 0.05 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report lb am.syn HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Long Bkgrd PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ tT t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 38 1213 80 324 1380 42 79 83 397 64 149 81 Future Volume(veh/h) 38 1213 80 324 1380 42 79 83 397 64 149 81 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.91 0.83 0.90 0.83 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 40 1264 80 338 1438 43 82 86 145 67 155 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 279 2068 131 387 2378 71 177 336 236 204 336 236 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.61 0.61 0.10 0.68 0.68 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 3387 214 1781 3522 105 1108 1870 1312 1032 1870 1312 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 40 662 682 338 724 757 82 86 145 67 155 15 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1777 1824 1781 1777 1850 1108 1870 1312 1032 1870 1312 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.0 27.7 27.9 7.7 26.8 27.0 8.6 4.7 12.2 7.2 8.9 1.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.0 27.7 27.9 7.7 26.8 27.0 17.5 4.7 12.2 11.9 8.9 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 279 1085 1114 387 1200 1249 177 336 236 204 336 236 V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.61 0.61 0.87 0.60 0.61 0.46 0.26 0.62 0.33 0.46 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 324 1085 1114 570 1200 1249 306 553 388 324 553 388 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 9.5 14.5 14.5 18.9 10.7 10.7 51.9 42.3 45.4 47.5 44.0 40.9 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.2 2.6 2.5 9.9 2.3 2.2 1.9 0.4 2.6 0.9 1.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.4 11.2 11.5 7.1 10.2 10.6 2.5 2.2 4.1 1.9 4.3 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 9.8 17.0 17.0 28.8 13.0 12.9 53.7 42.7 48.0 48.4 45.0 41.0 LnGrp LOS A B B C B B D D D D D D Approach Vol,veh/h 1384 1819 313 237 Approach Delay,s/veh 16.8 15.9 48.1 45.7 Approach LOS B B D D Timer-Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 26.0 15.7 78.3 26.0 7.9 86.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 34.5 23.0 46.0 34.5 6.0 63.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 13.9 9.7 29.9 19.5 3.0 29.0 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.8 0.9 4.9 1.1 0.0 6.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.8 HCM 6th LOS C Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report lb pm.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Long Bkgrd PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect 1 'r t ♦— Phase Number 2 3 4 6 7 8 Movement SBTL WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max Maximum Split(s) 40 28 52 40 11 69 Maximum Split(%) 33.3% 23.3% 43.3% 33.3% 9.2% 57.5% Minimum Split(s) 23.5 11 26 24 11 25 Yellow Time(s) 3 5 4 4 5 4 All-Red Time(s) 2.5 0 2 1.5 0 2 Minimum Initial(s) 7 4 10 7 4 10 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time(s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 13 11 11 Dual Entry Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time(s) 16 56 84 16 56 67 End Time(s) 56 84 16 56 67 16 Yield/Force Off(s) 50.5 79 10 50.5 62 10 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 39.5 79 117 39.5 62 119 Local Start Time(s) 6 46 74 6 46 57 Local Yield(s) 40.5 69 0 40.5 52 0 Local Yield 170(s) 29.5 69 107 29.5 52 109 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 90 Offset: 10(8%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL,Start of Yellow Splits and Phases: 84:Centre/Center&Prospect 1 02 ve-o3 --1"04 R' t06 "0703 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report lb pm.syn Queues Long Bkgrd PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 40 1347 338 1482 82 86 414 67 155 84 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.82 0.81 0.68 0.50 0.27 0.86 0.37 0.48 0.23 Control Delay 10.5 32.6 44.1 16.8 51.8 41.4 29.2 45.8 47.1 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.5 32.6 44.1 16.8 51.8 41.4 29.2 45.8 47.1 3.6 Queue Length 50th(ft) 6 444 174 330 59 60 78 47 112 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 24 #738 #363 601 96 91 190 79 151 18 Internal Link Dist(ft) 674 585 555 522 Turn Bay Length(ft) 225 225 135 135 180 150 Base Capacity(vph) 236 1647 434 2194 274 532 590 299 532 530 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.82 0.78 0.68 0.30 0.16 0.70 0.22 0.29 0.16 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report lb pm.syn HCM 6th AWSC Long Bkgrd AM 1: Center & Lake Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 9.4 Intersection LOS A Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* 4 y Traffic Vol,veh/h 157 36 36 150 49 110 Future Vol,veh/h 157 36 36 150 49 110 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 185 42 42 176 58 129 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 9.4 9.6 9.1 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 Vol Left,% 31% 0% 19% Vol Thru,% 0% 81% 81% Vol Right, % 69% 19% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 159 193 186 LT Vol 49 0 36 Through Vol 0 157 150 RT Vol 110 36 0 Lane Flow Rate 187 227 219 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util(X) 0.239 0.285 0.284 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.591 4.518 4.67 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 780 792 768 Service Time 2.634 2.558 2.711 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.24 0.287 0.285 HCM Control Delay 9.1 9.4 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.9 1.2 1.2 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report lb am.syn HCM 6th AWSC Long Bkgrd PM 1: Center & Lake Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 11.3 Intersection LOS B Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* 4 y Traffic Vol,veh/h 205 57 111 251 69 67 Future Vol,veh/h 205 57 111 251 69 67 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 220 61 119 270 74 72 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 10.3 12.6 9.7 HCM LOS B B A Lane NBLnl EBLnl WBLnl Vol Left,% 51% 0% 31% Vol Thru,% 0% 78% 69% Vol Right, % 49% 22% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 136 262 362 LT Vol 69 0 111 Through Vol 0 205 251 RT Vol 67 57 0 Lane Flow Rate 146 282 389 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util(X) 0.213 0.363 0.508 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.238 4.635 4.698 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 680 772 763 Service Time 3.313 2.692 2.751 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.215 0.365 0.51 HCM Control Delay 9.7 10.3 12.6 HCM Lane LOS A B B HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 1.7 2.9 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report lb pm.syn APPENDIX F HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Short Total AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT# tT t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 70 854 62 224 617 88 50 143 241 24 47 24 Future Volume(veh/h) 70 854 62 224 617 88 50 143 241 24 47 24 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.76 0.71 0.85 0.71 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 80 982 66 257 709 93 57 164 82 28 54 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 523 2114 142 459 2085 273 216 323 195 155 323 195 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.63 0.63 0.08 0.66 0.66 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 3372 227 1781 3147 412 1018 1870 1133 968 1870 1133 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 80 517 531 257 400 402 57 164 82 28 54 11 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1777 1822 1781 1777 1782 1018 1870 1133 968 1870 1133 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.7 16.9 16.9 5.2 10.8 10.8 5.6 8.7 7.1 3.0 2.7 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.7 16.9 16.9 5.2 10.8 10.8 8.3 8.7 7.1 11.7 2.7 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 523 1114 1142 459 1177 1181 216 323 195 155 323 195 V/C Ratio(X) 0.15 0.46 0.46 0.56 0.34 0.34 0.26 0.51 0.42 0.18 0.17 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 561 1114 1142 547 1177 1181 313 502 304 248 502 304 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 6.5 10.8 10.8 8.0 8.1 8.1 42.3 41.3 40.6 46.6 38.8 38.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.1 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.6 1.2 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.6 6.5 6.6 1.7 4.0 4.0 1.4 4.1 2.0 0.7 1.3 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.7 12.2 12.2 9.1 8.9 8.9 42.9 42.5 42.0 47.1 39.0 38.1 LnGrp LOS A B B A A A D D D D D D Approach Vol,veh/h 1128 1059 303 93 Approach Delay,s/veh 11.8 8.9 42.5 41.4 Approach LOS B A D D Timer-Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 23.5 12.6 74.0 23.5 8.7 77.9 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 28.5 13.0 52.0 28.5 6.0 59.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 13.7 7.2 18.9 10.7 3.7 12.8 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.2 0.4 4.0 1.1 0.0 2.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.3 HCM 6th LOS B Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st am.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Total AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect 1 'r t ♦- Phase Number 2 3 4 6 7 8 Movement SBTL WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max Maximum Split(s) 34 18 58 34 11 65 Maximum Split(%) 30.9% 16.4% 52.7% 30.9% 10.0% 59.1% Minimum Split(s) 23.5 11 26 24.5 11 25 Yellow Time(s) 3 5 4 4 5 4 All-Red Time(s) 2.5 0 2 1.5 0 2 Minimum Initial(s) 7 4 10 7 4 10 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time(s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 13 11 11 Dual Entry Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time(s) 79 3 21 79 3 14 End Time(s) 3 21 79 3 14 79 Yield/Force Off(s) 107.5 16 73 107.5 9 73 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 96.5 16 60 96.5 9 62 Local Start Time(s) 6 40 58 6 40 51 Local Yield(s) 34.5 53 0 34.5 46 0 Local Yield 170(s) 23.5 53 97 23.5 46 99 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 65 Offset:73(66%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL,Start of Yellow Splits and Phases: 84:Centre/Center&Prospect 1 02 4_�3 -iG3 i`R t06 F 07 �73 R' Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st am.syn Queues Short Total AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 80 1053 257 810 57 164 277 28 54 28 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.55 0.63 0.38 0.25 0.53 0.77 0.24 0.17 0.08 Control Delay 6.3 16.5 13.5 10.5 39.3 46.3 26.8 40.8 37.1 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.3 16.5 13.5 10.5 39.3 46.3 26.8 40.8 37.1 0.4 Queue Length 50th(ft) 13 225 45 131 35 107 45 17 33 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 35 342 107 206 63 149 124 39 59 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 512 221 555 529 Turn Bay Length(ft) 225 225 135 135 180 150 Base Capacity(vph) 469 1931 429 2130 352 482 444 186 482 503 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.55 0.60 0.38 0.16 0.34 0.62 0.15 0.11 0.06 Intersection Summary Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st am.syn HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Short Total PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ tT t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 45 1034 68 277 1179 39 67 82 338 82 140 81 Future Volume(veh/h) 45 1034 68 277 1179 39 67 82 338 82 140 81 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.89 0.81 0.87 0.81 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 47 1077 68 289 1228 40 70 85 66 85 146 19 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 350 2173 137 439 2419 79 162 307 211 194 307 211 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.64 0.64 0.08 0.69 0.69 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 3387 214 1781 3511 114 1091 1870 1286 1077 1870 1286 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 47 565 580 289 621 647 70 85 66 85 146 19 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1777 1824 1781 1777 1849 1091 1870 1286 1077 1870 1286 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 20.0 20.1 6.0 20.1 20.1 7.5 4.8 5.4 9.0 8.5 1.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 20.0 20.1 6.0 20.1 20.1 16.0 4.8 5.4 13.8 8.5 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 350 1140 1170 439 1224 1273 162 307 211 194 307 211 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.50 0.50 0.66 0.51 0.51 0.43 0.28 0.31 0.44 0.48 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 392 1140 1170 649 1224 1273 305 553 381 336 553 381 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 7.4 11.3 11.3 9.8 8.9 8.9 52.7 43.9 44.2 50.0 45.5 42.6 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.2 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.8 0.5 0.8 1.6 1.1 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.4 7.8 8.0 2.3 7.4 7.8 2.1 2.2 1.8 2.5 4.1 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 7.6 12.8 12.8 11.4 10.4 10.4 54.6 44.4 45.1 51.5 46.6 42.8 LnGrp LOS A B B B B B D D D D D D Approach Vol,veh/h 1192 1557 221 250 Approach Delay,s/veh 12.6 10.6 47.8 48.0 Approach LOS B B D D Timer-Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 24.2 13.8 82.0 24.2 8.2 87.7 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 34.5 23.0 46.0 34.5 6.0 63.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 15.8 8.0 22.1 18.0 3.1 22.1 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.8 0.8 4.4 0.7 0.0 5.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.8 HCM 6th LOS B Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st pm.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Short Total PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect 1 'r t ♦— Phase Number 2 3 4 6 7 8 Movement SBTL WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max Maximum Split(s) 40 28 52 40 11 69 Maximum Split(%) 33.3% 23.3% 43.3% 33.3% 9.2% 57.5% Minimum Split(s) 23.5 11 26 24 11 25 Yellow Time(s) 3 5 4 4 5 4 All-Red Time(s) 2.5 0 2 1.5 0 2 Minimum Initial(s) 7 4 10 7 4 10 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time(s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 13 11 11 Dual Entry Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time(s) 16 56 84 16 56 67 End Time(s) 56 84 16 56 67 16 Yield/Force Off(s) 50.5 79 10 50.5 62 10 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 39.5 79 117 39.5 62 119 Local Start Time(s) 6 46 74 6 46 57 Local Yield(s) 40.5 69 0 40.5 52 0 Local Yield 170(s) 29.5 69 107 29.5 52 109 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 70 Offset: 10(8%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL,Start of Yellow Splits and Phases: 84:Centre/Center&Prospect 1 02 ve-o3 --1"04 R' t06 "0703 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st pm.syn Queues Short Total PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 47 1148 289 1269 70 85 352 85 146 84 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.63 0.62 0.56 0.51 0.31 0.76 0.57 0.54 0.26 Control Delay 7.9 22.9 16.2 12.0 58.4 46.4 18.0 60.3 53.2 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.9 22.9 16.2 12.0 58.4 46.4 18.0 60.3 53.2 4.5 Queue Length 50th(ft) 7 312 63 255 50 59 19 61 105 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 22 522 173 407 92 99 118 106 158 20 Internal Link Dist(ft) 674 171 555 522 Turn Bay Length(ft) 225 225 135 135 180 150 Base Capacity(vph) 311 1809 504 2274 268 532 596 295 532 530 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.63 0.57 0.56 0.26 0.16 0.59 0.29 0.27 0.16 Intersection Summary Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st pm.syn HCM 6th TWSC Short Total AM 9: Prospect & RT Access Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt tT* r Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 1119 927 1 0 2 Future Vol,veh/h 0 1119 927 1 0 2 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1316 1091 1 0 2 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 546 Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 482 Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 482 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 12.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) - - 482 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.005 HCM Control Delay(s) - - 12.5 HCM Lane LOS - - B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - - 0 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st am.syn HCM 6th TWSC Short Total PM 9: Prospect & RT Access Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt tT* r Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 1454 1492 1 0 3 Future Vol,veh/h 0 1454 1492 1 0 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1563 1604 1 0 3 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 803 Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 326 Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 326 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 16.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) - - 326 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.01 HCM Control Delay(s) - - 16.2 HCM Lane LOS - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - - 0 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st pm.syn HCM 6th AWSC Short Total AM 1: Center & Lake Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 9 Intersection LOS A Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* 4 y Traffic Vol,veh/h 137 30 47 133 42 103 Future Vol,veh/h 137 30 47 133 42 103 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 161 35 55 156 49 121 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.3 8.7 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 Vol Left,% 29% 0% 26% Vol Thru,% 0% 82% 74% Vol Right, % 71% 18% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 145 167 180 LT Vol 42 0 47 Through Vol 0 137 133 RT Vol 103 30 0 Lane Flow Rate 171 196 212 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util(X) 0.213 0.244 0.27 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.488 4.462 4.598 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 798 804 781 Service Time 2.522 2.495 2.632 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.214 0.244 0.271 HCM Control Delay 8.7 8.9 9.3 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 1 1.1 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st am.syn HCM 6th AWSC Short Total PM 1: Center & Lake Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 11.4 Intersection LOS B Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* 4 y Traffic Vol,veh/h 186 48 147 227 59 84 Future Vol,veh/h 186 48 147 227 59 84 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 200 52 158 244 63 90 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 10 12.9 9.7 HCM LOS A B A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 Vol Left,% 41% 0% 39% Vol Thru,% 0% 79% 61% Vol Right, % 59% 21% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 143 234 374 LT Vol 59 0 147 Through Vol 0 186 227 RT Vol 84 48 0 Lane Flow Rate 154 252 402 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util(X) 0.219 0.326 0.525 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.134 4.671 4.696 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 693 765 764 Service Time 3.206 2.728 2.747 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.222 0.329 0.526 HCM Control Delay 9.7 10 12.9 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 1.4 3.1 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st pm.syn HCM 6th TWSC Short Total AM 5: West Access & Lake Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T *T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 239 1 1 178 2 1 Future Vol,veh/h 239 1 1 178 2 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 281 1 1 209 2 1 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 282 0 493 282 Stage 1 - - - - 282 - Stage 2 - - - - 211 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1280 - 535 757 Stage 1 - - - - 766 - Stage 2 - - - - 824 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1280 - 534 757 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 534 - Stage 1 - - - 766 - Stage 2 - - - 823 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 11.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 592 - 1280 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay(s) 11.1 - 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS B - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st am.syn HCM 6th TWSC Short Total PM 5: West Access & Lake Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T *T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 266 4 4 368 6 2 Future Vol,veh/h 266 4 4 368 6 2 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 296 4 4 409 7 2 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 300 0 715 298 Stage 1 - - - - 298 - Stage 2 - - - - 417 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1261 - 397 741 Stage 1 - - - - 753 - Stage 2 - - - - 665 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1261 - 395 741 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 395 - Stage 1 - - - 753 - Stage 2 - - - 662 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.1 13.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 447 - 1261 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay(s) 13.2 - 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS B - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0 - Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st pm.syn HCM 6th TWSC Short Total AM 7: Main Access & Lake Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T *T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 228 12 11 159 20 6 Future Vol,veh/h 228 12 11 159 20 6 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 268 14 13 187 24 7 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 282 0 488 275 Stage 1 - - - - 275 - Stage 2 - - - - 213 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1280 - 539 764 Stage 1 - - - - 771 - Stage 2 - - - - 823 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1280 - 533 764 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 533 - Stage 1 - - - 771 - Stage 2 - - - 814 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.5 11.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 573 - 1280 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 - 0.01 - HCM Control Delay(s) 11.6 - 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS B - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 0 - Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st am.syn HCM 6th TWSC Short Total PM 7: Main Access & Lake Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 2.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '+ *T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 233 35 36 313 59 20 Future Vol,veh/h 233 35 36 313 59 20 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 259 39 40 348 66 22 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 298 0 707 279 Stage 1 - - - - 279 - Stage 2 - - - - 428 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1263 - 402 760 Stage 1 - - - - 768 - Stage 2 - - - - 657 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1263 - 386 760 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 386 - Stage 1 - - - 768 - Stage 2 - - - 631 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.8 15.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 441 - 1263 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.199 - 0.032 - HCM Control Delay(s) 15.2 - 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS C - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 0.1 - Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report st pm.syn APPENDIX G HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Long Total AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT* tT t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 82 1002 73 262 723 103 59 167 282 26 55 27 Future Volume(veh/h) 82 1002 73 262 723 103 59 167 282 26 55 27 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.77 0.72 0.88 0.72 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 91 1113 77 291 803 105 66 186 145 29 61 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 477 2084 144 420 2081 272 213 323 196 140 323 196 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.62 0.62 0.09 0.66 0.66 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 3365 233 1781 3148 412 1017 1870 1134 921 1870 1134 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 91 587 603 291 453 455 66 186 145 29 61 13 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1777 1820 1781 1777 1782 1017 1870 1134 921 1870 1134 Q Serve(g_s),s 2.0 20.7 20.7 6.0 12.8 12.8 6.5 10.0 13.3 3.3 3.1 1.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 2.0 20.7 20.7 6.0 12.8 12.8 9.6 10.0 13.3 13.3 3.1 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 477 1100 1127 420 1175 1178 213 323 196 140 323 196 V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.53 0.53 0.69 0.39 0.39 0.31 0.58 0.74 0.21 0.19 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 513 1100 1127 495 1175 1178 310 502 304 228 502 304 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 6.9 11.9 11.9 11.2 8.5 8.5 43.0 41.8 43.2 47.9 38.9 38.1 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.2 1.9 1.8 3.3 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.6 5.4 0.7 0.3 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 8.0 8.2 2.8 4.7 4.7 1.7 4.7 4.0 0.8 1.5 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 7.1 13.8 13.7 14.5 9.4 9.4 43.8 43.4 48.6 48.6 39.2 38.2 LnGrp LOS A B B B A A D D D D D D Approach Vol,veh/h 1281 1199 397 103 Approach Delay,s/veh 13.3 10.7 45.4 41.7 Approach LOS B B D D Timer-Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 23.5 13.4 73.1 23.5 8.8 77.7 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 28.5 13.0 52.0 28.5 6.0 59.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 15.3 8.0 22.7 15.3 4.0 14.8 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.3 0.4 4.7 1.4 0.0 3.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.5 HCM 6th LOS B Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It am.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Long Total AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect 1 'r t ♦- Phase Number 2 3 4 6 7 8 Movement SBTL WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max Maximum Split(s) 34 18 58 34 11 65 Maximum Split(%) 30.9% 16.4% 52.7% 30.9% 10.0% 59.1% Minimum Split(s) 23.5 11 26 24.5 11 25 Yellow Time(s) 3 5 4 4 5 4 All-Red Time(s) 2.5 0 2 1.5 0 2 Minimum Initial(s) 7 4 10 7 4 10 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time(s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 13 11 11 Dual Entry Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time(s) 79 3 21 79 3 14 End Time(s) 3 21 79 3 14 79 Yield/Force Off(s) 107.5 16 73 107.5 9 73 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 96.5 16 60 96.5 9 62 Local Start Time(s) 6 40 58 6 40 51 Local Yield(s) 34.5 53 0 34.5 46 0 Local Yield 170(s) 23.5 53 97 23.5 46 99 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 110 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 75 Offset:73(66%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL,Start of Yellow Splits and Phases: 84:Centre/Center&Prospect 1 02 4_�3 -iG3 i`R t06 F 07 �73 R' Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It am.syn Queues Long Total AM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 91 1194 291 917 66 186 313 29 61 30 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.68 0.76 0.45 0.26 0.53 0.86 0.22 0.17 0.07 Control Delay 7.9 22.5 29.2 12.6 37.4 44.0 39.4 38.1 35.1 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.9 22.5 29.2 12.6 37.4 44.0 39.4 38.1 35.1 0.4 Queue Length 50th(ft) 16 342 86 171 40 118 90 17 36 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 40 435 #258 255 74 174 #197 42 67 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 512 221 555 529 Turn Bay Length(ft) 225 225 135 135 180 150 Base Capacity(vph) 406 1747 384 2055 350 482 430 181 482 503 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.68 0.76 0.45 0.19 0.39 0.73 0.16 0.13 0.06 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It am.syn HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Long Total PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT* tT t r t r Traffic Volume(veh/h) 50 1213 80 325 1382 45 79 95 397 91 162 93 Future Volume(veh/h) 50 1213 80 325 1382 45 79 95 397 91 162 93 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.93 0.83 0.91 0.83 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 52 1264 80 339 1440 46 82 99 145 95 169 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 277 2032 128 386 2336 75 177 349 247 206 349 247 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.60 0.60 0.10 0.66 0.66 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 3387 214 1781 3514 112 1099 1870 1323 1031 1870 1323 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 52 662 682 339 727 759 82 99 145 95 169 26 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 1777 1824 1781 1777 1849 1099 1870 1323 1031 1870 1323 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.3 28.5 28.7 8.2 27.9 28.0 8.7 5.5 12.0 10.5 9.7 2.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.3 28.5 28.7 8.2 27.9 28.0 18.3 5.5 12.0 15.9 9.7 2.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 277 1066 1094 386 1181 1229 177 349 247 206 349 247 V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.62 0.62 0.88 0.62 0.62 0.46 0.28 0.59 0.46 0.48 0.11 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 317 1066 1094 563 1181 1229 296 553 391 318 553 391 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 10.2 15.3 15.3 19.7 11.4 11.4 51.8 41.9 44.6 48.7 43.6 40.5 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.3 2.7 2.7 10.6 2.4 2.3 1.9 0.4 2.2 1.6 1.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.5 11.6 12.0 7.0 10.7 11.2 2.5 2.6 4.1 2.8 4.6 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay,s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.5 18.0 18.0 30.2 13.8 13.8 53.7 42.3 46.8 50.3 44.7 40.7 LnGrp LOS B B B C B B D D D D D D Approach Vol,veh/h 1396 1825 326 290 Approach Delay,s/veh 17.7 16.8 47.2 46.2 Approach LOS B B D D Timer-Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 26.9 16.1 77.0 26.9 8.3 84.8 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 34.5 23.0 46.0 34.5 6.0 63.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l1),s 17.9 10.2 30.7 20.3 3.3 30.0 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 1.0 0.9 4.8 1.1 0.0 6.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.0 HCM 6th LOS C Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It pm.syn Timing Report, Sorted By Phase Long Total PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect 1 'r t ♦— Phase Number 2 3 4 6 7 8 Movement SBTL WBL EBTL NBTL EBL WBTL Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize Recall Mode None None C-Max None None C-Max Maximum Split(s) 40 28 52 40 11 69 Maximum Split(%) 33.3% 23.3% 43.3% 33.3% 9.2% 57.5% Minimum Split(s) 23.5 11 26 24 11 25 Yellow Time(s) 3 5 4 4 5 4 All-Red Time(s) 2.5 0 2 1.5 0 2 Minimum Initial(s) 7 4 10 7 4 10 Vehicle Extension(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Minimum Gap(s) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Time Before Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce(s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk Time(s) 7 7 7 7 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11 13 11 11 Dual Entry Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Inhibit Max Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Start Time(s) 16 56 84 16 56 67 End Time(s) 56 84 16 56 67 16 Yield/Force Off(s) 50.5 79 10 50.5 62 10 Yield/Force Off 170(s) 39.5 79 117 39.5 62 119 Local Start Time(s) 6 46 74 6 46 57 Local Yield(s) 40.5 69 0 40.5 52 0 Local Yield 170(s) 29.5 69 107 29.5 52 109 Intersection Summary Cycle Length 120 Control Type Actuated-Coordinated Natural Cycle 90 Offset: 10(8%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL,Start of Yellow Splits and Phases: 84:Centre/Center&Prospect 1 02 ve-o3 --1"04 R' t06 "0703 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It pm.syn Queues Long Total PM 84: Centre/Center & Prospect Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 52 1347 339 1487 82 99 414 95 169 97 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.82 0.81 0.68 0.52 0.30 0.86 0.54 0.52 0.26 Control Delay 11.3 33.0 44.7 17.1 53.3 42.1 28.7 53.6 48.1 5.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.3 33.0 44.7 17.1 53.3 42.1 28.7 53.6 48.1 5.3 Queue Length 50th(ft) 8 445 176 335 60 69 78 70 123 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 30 #738 #367 605 97 102 190 109 163 28 Internal Link Dist(ft) 674 171 555 522 Turn Bay Length(ft) 225 225 135 135 180 150 Base Capacity(vph) 234 1637 433 2179 258 532 590 286 532 530 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.82 0.78 0.68 0.32 0.19 0.70 0.33 0.32 0.18 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It pm.syn HCM 6th TWSC Long Total AM 9: Prospect & RT Access Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt tT* r Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 1310 1086 1 0 2 Future Vol,veh/h 0 1310 1086 1 0 2 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1541 1278 1 0 2 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 640 Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 418 Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 418 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 13.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) - - 418 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.006 HCM Control Delay(s) - - 13.7 HCM Lane LOS - - B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - - 0 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It am.syn HCM 6th TWSC Long Total PM 9: Prospect & RT Access Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt tT* r Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 1701 1749 1 0 3 Future Vol,veh/h 0 1701 1749 1 0 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1829 1881 1 0 3 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 941 Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 264 Stage 1 0 - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - 0 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 264 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 18.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) - - 264 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.012 HCM Control Delay(s) - - 18.8 HCM Lane LOS - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - - 0 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It pm.syn HCM 6th AWSC Long Total AM 1: Center & Lake Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 9.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* 4 y Traffic Vol,veh/h 161 36 53 163 49 119 Future Vol,veh/h 161 36 53 163 49 119 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 189 42 62 192 58 140 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 9.6 10.1 9.4 HCM LOS A B A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 Vol Left,% 29% 0% 25% Vol Thru,% 0% 82% 75% Vol Right, % 71% 18% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 168 197 216 LT Vol 49 0 53 Through Vol 0 161 163 RT Vol 119 36 0 Lane Flow Rate 198 232 254 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util(X) 0.257 0.296 0.333 Departure Headway(Hd) 4.677 4.595 4.721 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 765 779 760 Service Time 2.725 2.644 2.769 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.259 0.298 0.334 HCM Control Delay 9.4 9.6 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th-tile Q 1 1.2 1.5 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It am.syn HCM 6th AWSC Long Total PM 1: Center & Lake Intersection Intersection Delay,s/veh 13.2 Intersection LOS B Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* 4 y Traffic Vol,veh/h 217 57 163 264 69 94 Future Vol,veh/h 217 57 163 264 69 94 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 233 61 175 284 74 101 Number of Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB Opposing Lanes 1 1 0 Conflicting Approach Left NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 0 1 HCM Control Delay 11.1 15.5 10.5 HCM LOS B C B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 Vol Left,% 42% 0% 38% Vol Thru,% 0% 79% 62% Vol Right, % 58% 21% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 163 274 427 LT Vol 69 0 163 Through Vol 0 217 264 RT Vol 94 57 0 Lane Flow Rate 175 295 459 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util(X) 0.267 0.395 0.616 Departure Headway(Hd) 5.477 4.822 4.826 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 661 737 739 Service Time 3.477 2.918 2.912 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.265 0.4 0.621 HCM Control Delay 10.5 11.1 15.5 HCM Lane LOS B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 1.1 1.9 4.3 Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It pm.syn HCM 6th TWSC Long Total AM 5: West Access & Lake Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T *T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 279 1 1 214 2 1 Future Vol,veh/h 279 1 1 214 2 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 328 1 1 252 2 1 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 329 0 583 329 Stage 1 - - - - 329 - Stage 2 - - - - 254 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1231 - 475 712 Stage 1 - - - - 729 - Stage 2 - - - - 788 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1231 - 475 712 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 475 - Stage 1 - - - 729 - Stage 2 - - - 787 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 11.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 534 - 1231 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.001 - HCM Control Delay(s) 11.8 - 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS B - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It am.syn HCM 6th TWSC Long Total PM 5: West Access & Lake Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T *T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 307 4 4 421 6 2 Future Vol,veh/h 307 4 4 421 6 2 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 341 4 4 468 7 2 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 345 0 819 343 Stage 1 - - - - 343 - Stage 2 - - - - 476 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1214 - 345 700 Stage 1 - - - - 719 - Stage 2 - - - - 625 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1214 - 344 700 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 344 - Stage 1 - - - 719 - Stage 2 - - - 623 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.1 14.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 394 - 1214 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay(s) 14.3 - 8 0 HCM Lane LOS B - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0 - Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It pm.syn HCM 6th TWSC Long Total AM 7: Main Access & Lake Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T1. *T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 268 12 11 195 20 6 Future Vol,veh/h 268 12 11 195 20 6 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 315 14 13 229 24 7 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 329 0 577 322 Stage 1 - - - - 322 - Stage 2 - - - - 255 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1231 - 478 719 Stage 1 - - - - 735 - Stage 2 - - - - 788 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1231 - 472 719 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 472 - Stage 1 - - - 735 - Stage 2 - - - 779 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.4 12.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 513 - 1231 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.06 - 0.011 - HCM Control Delay(s) 12.5 - 8 0 HCM Lane LOS B - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 0 - Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It am.syn HCM 6th TWSC Long Total PM 7: Main Access & Lake Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 2.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '+ *T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 274 35 36 366 59 20 Future Vol,veh/h 274 35 36 366 59 20 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 304 39 40 407 66 22 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 343 0 811 324 Stage 1 - - - - 324 - Stage 2 - - - - 487 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1216 - 349 717 Stage 1 - - - - 733 - Stage 2 - - - - 618 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1216 - 334 717 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 334 - Stage 1 - - - 733 - Stage 2 - - - 592 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.7 17.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 386 - 1216 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.227 - 0.033 - HCM Control Delay(s) 17.1 - 8.1 0 HCM Lane LOS C - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.9 - 0.1 - Scenario 1 City of Fort Collins Signal Timing 04/18/2024 Synchro 11 Light Report It pm.syn APPENDIX H 7 7i Lake Prospect a� U a� a� 0 U SCALE: 1"=500' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA _—o'/1—DELICH —7,1 1—ASSOCIATES Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS,April 2024 Pedestrian LOS Worksheet Project Location Classification: Pedestrian District Description of Destination Level of Service(minimum based on project location classification) Applicable Destination Area Street visual Area Within 1320' Classification Directness Continuity Crossings Ameest& Security ies Minimum A A B A A 1 CSU Campus School Actual A A B A A Proposed A A B A A Minimum A A B A A 2 CSU Student Housing Residential Actual A A B A A Proposed A A B A A Minimum A A B A A 3 CSU Student Housing Residential Actual A A B A A Proposed A A B A A Minimum A A B A A 4 Commercial Uses Commercial Actual A A B A A Proposed A A B A A Minimum A A B A A 5 Commercial Uses Commercial Actual A A B A A Proposed A A B A A Minimum 6 Actual Proposed Minimum 7 Actual Proposed Minimum 8 Actual Proposed Minimum 9 Actual Proposed Minimum 9 0 Actual Proposed 7 7i Lake K l Prospect a) U m 0 U SCALE: 1"=500' BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA _—o'/1—DELICH -7,1 1—ASSOCIATES Prospect Plaza Student Housing TIS,April 2024 Bicycle LOS Worksheet Level of Service—Connectivity Minimum Actual Proposed Base Connectivity: C B B Specific connections to priority sites: Description of Destination Applicable Destination Area Area Within 1320' Classification 1 CSU Campus School A A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8