HomeMy WebLinkAboutGILMARTIN SUBDIVISION AND DUPLEX - FDP240008 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - Drainage Related Document� .I .i :�:� _��
�
�� �I
���I� ��
,
Sorensen Engineering & Construction, Inc.
Civil/Environmental Engineering
June 5, 2024
Mr. Dan Mogen
City of Fort Collins
Development Review Engineer
222 Laporte Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Subject: Drainage Narrative
Gilmartin Subdivision
341 South Taft Hill Road
Larimer County Parcel No. 9709404005
Dear Dan,
Sorensen Engineering & Construction, Inc. (SEC) is pleased to submit this Drainage Narrative for
the proposed Gilmartin Subdivision. As shown on Figure 1, Vicinity Map, the site is located at
341 South Taft Hill Road, Fort Collins, Colorado. The site is located in the SE %, Section 9,
Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City of Fort Collins, County of
Larimer, State of Colorado. The project site is located in the Mulberry Hill neighborhood and is
bordered to the north by an existing single-family residential property, to the east by South Taft
Hill Road and City Park Golf Course, to the west by single-family homes (Mulberry Hil1J and
Poudre High School, and to the south by single family homes (Mulberry Hill) and a church, and
Mulberry Street. The site is currently covered with native grasses, with approximately 80%
vegetative cover.
The Site is located in the Canal Importation Basin. There are no existing stormwater drainage
facilities on the subject property. The site is relatively flat, with existing drainage patterns
flowing gently from west to east. The New Mercer Ditch is present about %-mile to the east;
running through the City Park Nine golf course. The Site is currently vacant ground with native
grasses and weeds across the property.
Hydrolo�ical Soil Type
The NRCS Custom Soil Resource Report for the site is provided herein in Attachment A. As
shown, the on-site soil is primarily a Nunn clay loam at 1 to 3% slope with a small section on the
west side of the lot (west of the future Pennsylvania ROW) consisting of Altvan-Satanta loams at
0 to 3% slope. The entire area for this proposed project lies within the Nunn clay loam soils with
a Hydrologic Soil Group B.
Draina�e Basin Description
This project is located in the Canal Importation Basin in Fort Collins. The Canal Importation
Basin encompasses almost five square miles (3,200 acres) of west-central Fort Collins. The basin
is bounded generally by Laporte Avenue on the north, the foothills on the west, drake Road to
1901 Bear Court / Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
(970) 590-1579 / paul@secengineering.net
the south and extends almost to Shields Street on the east. Across the basin, a 100-year storm
event could lead to flood-related damage to homes and other structures.
There are no master planning improvements on or adjacent to the site. Historic drainage
patterns within the basin are from west to east. There have been significant precipitation and
flood events over the last 100 years that have caused property damage within the basin. There
are no irrigation ditches, reservoirs, or other facilities that influence or are influenced by the
local drainage.
Project Description
The proposed project contains approximately 0.77 acres; including the following characteristics:
Lot One for a Duplex: .58 acre
Dedication of Pennsylvania Street: .09 acre
Outlot: .15 acre
Dedication of Public Right-of-Way for S. Taft Hill Road (Two-Lane Arteria): 12'
Dedication of Utility Easement along 5. Taft Hill Road: 15'
The proposed project is to create one lot for a two-family dwelling (duplex). The proposed
duplex on Lot One, 0.58 acre, equals 3.45 dwelling units per acre which exceeds the LMN
required minimum density of 3.00 dwelling units per acre. Existing Public Improvements in the
project vicinity include Taft Hill Road to the east: a two-Lane arterial that includes a four-foot
attached walk, vertical curb, gutter and striped bike lane. There is currently 30 feet of half-
width as measured from the centerline. There are no overhead electric lines. The nearest fire
hydrant is at the northeast corner of Taft Hill Road and Mulberry Street.
The proposed duplex would be under one ownership. It is not intended to be divided into two
single family detached dwellings (townhomes). Lot One and the Outlot would be owned by a
single entity. Therefore, there are no common areas and, therefore, no Homeowners'
Association.
Right-of-Way for Pennsylvania Street is dedicated for 57 feet wide per the requirement for a
Residential Local Street in accordance with LCUASS 7-9F, and aligns with three previous
dedications (Farmstead, Stead and Cherokee Flying Heights Subdivisions). The proposed Outlot
lies west of Pennsylvania Street and is not intended to be served by utilities until the
construction of this public street. As an Outlot, it is not intended to be a parcel eligible for a
building permit at this time.
Existing and Proposed Drainage Patterns
The project site is currently vacant, covered with grass and weed vegetation, with approximately
2% impervious area. Drainage patterns are from west to east across the site, discharging in
general via sheet flow to S. Taft Hill Road. Existing site conditions are presented on the
preliminary plat, provided herein as Figure 2. As shown, no existing improvements are found on
the subject property. Proposed site improvements and specific water quality (Low Impact
Development — LID) measures include the following:
Construction of the access driveway along the north side of the subject property. The
driveway will include permeable pavement design, and will encompass an area of 150-
feet long by 16-feet wide for a total area of 2,400 square feet (sf), or 0.06 acres(AC);
Two-unit duplex, with a building footprint of 35-feet x 60-feet, for a total rooftop area of
4,200-sf (0.10 AC);
Direct building downspouts into landscaped areas;
2
• Gravel parking area with 4 parking spaces (10' x 20' each) for a total area of 800 sf plus
an access drive of approximately 400 sf, for a total of 1,200 sf of gravel (total 0.03 AC);
• Site grading will be accomplished to provide disconnection of impervious areas to the
extent possible; and
• The remaining portions of the subject property will be landscaped with grass and
plantings or remain as native, undisturbed grass.
As indicated above, this site is in the Fort Collins Canal Importation Basin. Figure 3, City of Fort
Collins Flood Risk Map, provides the corresponding flood map, showing the City-provided 100-
year flood fringe depth of flow across the site. Figure 4, Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control
Plan presents details of the proposed drainage facilities for this project. As shown, the proposed
structures are elevated so that the lowest floor, including HVAC ductwork, are at least 18-inches
above the 100-year Base Flood Elevation (BFE) as defined . The basic drainage plan for this
project is to maintain the existing drainage pattern: sheet flow across the property from west to
east, diverted around the proposed building along the north side, and discharging via the
inverted crown driveway (with porous pavement) into the curb and gutter flow in Taft Hill Road
and flowing to the existing storm sewer inlet south of the site along the west side on Taft Hill
Road. Off-site flow to adjacent properties will be mitigated by grading to direct flow from the
west side of the proposed duplex units to the inverted crown driveway, and thence to 5 Taft Hill
Road.
Hydrologic Criteria
Rainfall runoff date used are as described in the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual,
Chapter 5, Hydrology Standards. The "minor storm" analysis is the 2-year event, and the "major
storm" even is the 100-year event. The 2-year drainage system is designed to transport
stormwater runoff from the site with minimal disruption to neighbors or the urban
environment. This minor storm runoff will be conveyed in the curb and gutter of Taft Hill Road
to the nearby storm sewer inlet. The 100-year drainage system is designed to eliminate the loss
of life and to minimize adjacent property damage and to convey runoff to the Taft Hill curb and
gutter and thence to the storm sewer inlet. The hydrologic calculations for this drainage
investigation are based on the historic and proposed percent impervious areas shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Existing and Proposed % Impervious Calculations
Total Drainage Area = 0.77 Acres = 33,541 square feet (sf)
Surface Cover/Use Defined % i1 Area (sf)
Historical/Existing Proposed
Historical Flow Analysis 0.02 33,541 0
Driveway (permeable pavement) 0.55 0 2,400
Parking and drive area (gravel) 0.80 0 1,200
Rooftop 0.95 0 4,200
Undisturbed or Decompacted soil 0.05 0 15,000
Landscape/grasses2 0.20 0 10,741
Historical % i 0.02
Proposed % i 0.27
1. Reference: MHFD Stormwater Criteria Manual, Volume 3, Chapter 6, Table 6-3.
2. Assume landscape area around buildings; overall impervious areas to be more precisely
defined and presented in an exhibit prior to building permit application.
3
The Rational Method is used to calculate both the minor and major runoff events. The one-hour
point rainfall depth used for the 2-year event is 0.98 inches and for the 100-year event is 3.67
inches. The Rational Method is used to analyze the existing and fully developed conditions. The
MHFD hydrologic runoff calculations are presented in Attachment B.
The hydrological analysis was computed using the Peak Runoff Prediction by the Rational
Method spreadsheet developed by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (Mile High
Flood District) as described in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (USDCM), Volume 1.
The Hydrologic Calculations are presented in Appendix B, the results of which are summarized in
Table 2.
Table 2. Results of Peak Runoff Flow Prediction by the Rational Method
Basin Runoff Coefficients Peak Runoff Flowrate (cfs)
Existing Developed Existing Developed
2-yr 100-yr 2-yr 100-yr 2-yr 100-yr 2-yr 100-yr
Project 0.01 0.44 0.18 0.55 0.01 1.95 0.27 3.06
Conclusions
As is demonstrated above, the proposed site improvements will increase the estimated peak
runoff flowrate from 0.01 to 0.27 cfs for the 2-year event, and from 1.95 to 3.06 cfs for the 100-
year event. This Drainage Narrative was prepared in accordance with the Fort Collins
Stormwater Criteria Manual, and SEC believes that the increase in peak runoff flowrates will not
impact adjacent properties.
"I hereby attest that this report for the preliminary &/or final (?) drainage design for the
Gilmartin Subdivision was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, in accordance with
the provisions of the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual. I understand that the City of Fort
Collins does not and will not assume liability for drainage facilities designed by others."
Please do not hesitate to contact me directly if you have any questions or concerns regarding
this Drainage Narrative, or if you require any additional information.
Respectfully,
Paul C. Sorensen, PE
Attachments
��`��'i � y � o�
90 �� 6/05/2024 �; �;
:.e��,• ��6y`�.
�'�i /fs•....••�`G `\��
��''% �ON A�. .....�����
n
�
J Lj �o t
LANCER DR
I '� CO\RD I
�� -� ��
c �� "
J �V
z ]
---.� O
�
0
�
z ^
o �
Mountain 3
� v1CW - � 505
9 `,
Grandview Cem
- \
��/J�f�Y 1� � - `i
T� (
A \
%�_S� lv oGar - �
� '
�f�, �0 ^ �
— __ --d�i�
� � E�M sr
Q
� Q � SYCAMORE ST \ �4SON
2 0 �T '�
W W
N N 3 Q N CHERRYST ��
j N Y Z � N C
COLUMBME C�'f 3 a . � p MAPLE ST �, �
. I.. . . � J . �. -
Z Z o �i� Larimler
� I LAPORTE AVE � � � JuStiCe
� Z .j�{
,-7 � � W MOUNTAIN AVE
� � ❑ � � o
' U W
W N W OAK 5T
I ��Q � PARK DR Q Q i '^
o C\1 0 � o m
�� � ��� o �
Y O �
U H �
.51�. G �� � � W MAGNOLIA ST = I:
� 0 3 -
W MULBERRY ST ,`� o '^ .� I
' o
\ `� ' A = > N
� � � W MYRTLE ST Z
o� PROPERTY z o
�� LOCATION RESTMORE PL� , � u '„� �
� j � W LAUREL ST
3 < 16 c� f... o � a�
m �, �.
"' � ? > W PLUM ST �� p,P '
A o o � Q NORTH DR �
�� A N y ;o
Z S�g> � A 15 o Treil Cotorado State ��
o W ELIZABETH ST � G�ee� . Q 14 Univ2fSity � o
. o " Q UNIVERSITY AVE f
0. 0
� o W pVE 1 U' SOUTH DR W o
� AR�tE F
� W m �LE � � � �
� A n z �+'
v � A � - .. J o W PITKIN ST Q �.¢i
_ � SPRINGFIELD DR ;� z
O A p F�-
W LAKE ST A � � Q = ���W LAKE ST "
o a I z � ' _
A >
W PROSPECT RD m T7N��R69W ;
�
. o
. � / � -I �� ,
�,�_ ,� W F
CEDARW000OR , -t ��'.� ��;'•, o L _
� � �z o j
' 1 � . W y� F . _ �
i- � '.
11 l i �
� � �'1� ' ` - " ��� � � � W STUART ST ��'�'BERG DR '. �� � � F'
� _ ^ s� �
� - — � o
. , �p _ P4' , o :i GILGALA� WAY 'So' (�, .�t_
� � � � - %p i' v . _��� � . �pJ .
4,� � ,.,�i`��� 23 ��� 4I
;� 1
`T ,. 0� F- 22 �n� LAND MOORF i;_ ` � m I
E OAK 5�
E OLIVE ST
E MAGNOLIA
F-
Z"- �
0
u �
z
� w
ti �
Q � �
F Z
E PLUM ST �
�
a
GARFIELD S
VARKER
; - �
0 1/2 1
MAP SOURCE:
USGS FORT COLLINS, COLO 2016 �' Scale in Miles
�I CONTOUR INTERVAL: 10 FEET
LARIMER COUNTY PARCEL NUMBER:
9709404005 PROJECT DATE: FEBRUARY 2022
PftOJECT
SORENSEN ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC 341 STaft Hill Rd
CIVIL/ ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Fort Collins, CO FIGURE 1
1901 BEAR COURT FORT COLLINS, C0 80525 VICINITY MAP
PHONE:970 590-1579 paul@secengineering.net
GILMARTIN SUBDIVISION
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF
FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
FOUND 3/4" REBAR AND 2.5"
ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. 29407
STAMPED PER MONUMENT
RECORD FILED AUGUST 31,
2008
N 89°35'30" W
� 15.00'
S 89°35'30" E 79.00'
ANDERSON CECELIA M
REC. NO. 20100078322
S 89°35'30" E 444.10'
S 89°35'30" E 365.10'
0
�
f
Z Z
U
o�M o
N ' � �
� ��
o .-. -�
cn Q o -� cn
��o��
c9 ~ N O cD
�O
� � Z z o�o
N 89°35'30" W
15.00'
OUTLOT
6524.49 Sq. Ft.
0.15 Acres
N 89°35'30" W 79.00'
O
0
0
0
N
�
�
�
rn
�
W
00
PENNSLYVANIA
STREET
57' RIGHT-OF-WAY
DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT
3954.54 Sq. Ft.
0.09 ac.
N 89°35'30" W 200.00'
THE PENTECOSTALS OF FORT COLLINS
REC. NO. 20060085357
LLOYD THOMAS C/CAROLYN F
REC. NO. 20060032629
zo ° zo 4,o s,o
( IN US FEET )
1 inch = 20ft.
CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION:
The undersigned does hereby dedicate and convey to the City Of Fort Collins, Colorado, for public use, forever, the streets and easements as laid out and designated on this Plat;
provided, however, that (1) acceptance by the city of this dedication of easements does not impose upon the city a duty to maintain the easements so dedicated, and (2) acceptance
by the city of this dedication of streets does not impose upon the city a duty to maintain streets so dedicated until such time as the provisions of the Maintenance Guarantee have been
fully satisfied.
MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE:
The undersigned hereby warrants and guarantees to the City Of Fort Collins, for a period of two (2) years from the date of completion and first acceptance by the city of the
improvements warranted hereunder, the full and complete maintenance and repair of the improvements constructed under the authority of this Plat. This warranty and guarantee is
made in accordance with the City Of Fort Collins Land Use Code and/or the Transitional Land Use Regulations, as applicable. This guarantee applies to the streets and all other
appurtenant structures and amenities lying within the rights-of-way, easements and other public properties, including, without limitation, all curbing, sidewalks, bike paths, drainage
pipes, culverts, catch basins, drainage ditches and landscaping. Any maintenance and/or repair required on utilities shall be coordinated with the owning utility company or
department. The undersigned shall maintain said improvements in a manner that will assure compliance on a consistent basis with all construction standards, safety requirements and
environmental protection requirements of the city. The undersigned shall also correct and repair, or cause to be corrected and repaired, all damages to said improvements resulting
from development-related or building-related activities. In the event the undersigned fails to correct any damages within thirty (30) days after written notice thereof, then said damages
may be corrected by the city and all costs and charges billed to and paid by the undersigned. The city shall also have any other remedies available to it as authorized by law. Any
damages which occurred prior to the end of said two (2) year period and which are unrepaired at the termination of said period shall remain the responsibility of the undersigned.
REPAIR GUARANTEE:
In consideration of the approval of this final plat and other valuable consideration, the undersigned does hereby agree to hold the City Of Fort Collins, Colorado, harmless for a five (5)
year period, commencing upon the date of completion and first acceptance by the city of the improvements constructed under the authority of this plat, from any and all claims,
damages, or demands arising on account of the design and construction of public improvements of the property shown herein; and the Owner furthermore commits to make necessary
repairs to said public improvements, to include, without limitation, the roads, streets, fills, embankments, ditches, cross pans, sub-drains, culverts, walls and bridges within the
right-of-way, easements and other public properties, resulting from failures caused by design and/or construction defects. This agreement to hold the city harmless includes defects in
materials and workmanship, as well as defects caused by or consisting of settling trenches, fills or excavations. Further, the undersigned warrants that he/she owns fee simple title to
the property shown hereon and agrees that the City Of Fort Collins shall not be liable to the undersigned or his/her successors in interest during the warranty period, for any claim of
damages resulting from negligence in exercising engineering techniques and due caution in the construction of cross drains, drives, structures or buildings, the changing of courses of
streams and rivers, flooding from natural creeks and rivers, and any other matter whatsoever on private property. Any and all monetary liability occurring under this paragraph shall be
the liability of the Owner. I further warrant that I have the right to convey said land according to this Plat. The obligations of the undersigned pursuant to the "Maintenance Guarantee"
and "Repair Guarantee" provisions set forth above may not be assigned or transferred to any other person or entity unless the warranted improvements are completed by, and a Letter
of Acceptance of the warranted improvements is received from the city by, such other person or entity.
NOTICE OF OTHER DOCUMENTS:
All persons take notice that the Developer and/or Owner has executed certain documents pertaining to this Development which create certain rights and obligations of the
Development, the Developer and/or subsequent Owners of all or portions of the Development site, many of which obligations constitute promises and covenants which run with the
land. The said documents may also be amended from time to time and may include, without limitation, the Development Agreement, Site And Landscape Covenants, Final Site Plan,
Final Landscape Plan, and Architectural Elevations, which documents are on file in the office of the clerk of The City Of Fort Collins and should be closely examined by all persons
interested in purchasing any portion of the Development site.
NOTICE
ALL RESPONSIBILITIES AND COSTS OF OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND RECONSTRUCTION
OF THE PRIVATE STREETS AND/OR DRIVES LOCATED ON THE PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT IS
THE SUBJECT OF THIS PLAT SHALL BE BORNE BY THE OWNERS OF SAID PROPERTY, EITHER
INDIVIDUALLY, OR COLLECTIVELY, THROUGH A PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, IF
APPLICABLE. THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS SHALL HAVE NO OBLIGATION OF OPERATION,
MAINTENANCE OR RECONSTRUCTION OF SUCH PRIVATE STREETS AND/OR DRIVES NOR
SHALL THE CITY HAVE ANY OBLIGATION TO ACCEPT SUCH STREETS AND/OR DRIVES AS
PUBLIC STREETS OR DRIVES.
LOT 1
25,330.19 Sq. Ft.
0.58± Acres
�-----
-------150.0'-----
N 89°35'30" W 365.05'
N 89°35'30" W 444.05'
N 89°35'30" W 256.0'
I
------i
1 1�
LEGEND
�
�
�
U1
�
�
m
�
�
z
�
0
�
�
0
O
0
O
0
0
m
�
�
w
�
�
z0
..1 o C
a- o �
�' o
� O
� ��
��D
� �
� ��
� ��
�
0o O
D
0
z
0
�
0
0
O
0
�
�
N
�
w
�
O = FOUND 5/8" REBAR
Q� = FOUND 1/2" REBAR
FOUND 5/8" REBAR AND RED
� PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. 20676
FOUND 2.5" ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S.
� 14823 STAMPED 1.0 FT W.C.
O SET 5/8" REBAR AND GREEN
� PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. 38547
�FOUND SECTION MONUMENT
AS DESCRIBED
LOT LINE
EASEMENT LINE
S 89°35'30" E
42.00'
ON
C ;p
_ �
� _
D �
� �
--I —r1
��
OD
D �
�
N 89°35'30"
W 42.00'
, 'J
STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP AND SUBDIVISION
Know all men by these presents, that the undersigned, being owners of the following described land:
A tract of land located in Section 9, Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian
more particularly describes as:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of Section 9, Township 7 North, Range 69 West North 249.37 feet,
Thence S 89°35'30" E 42.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning, thence N 89°35'30" W 444.05 feet,
thence N 00°02'15" W 69.38 feet, thence S 89°35'30" E 444.10 feet to the west line of the South Taft
Hill Right-of-Way, thence South 69.38 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
which above described tract contains 30,809.08 Sq. Ft. being 0.71 acres, more or less have caused
the above described land to be surveyed and subdivided into lots, tracts and streets as shown on this
plat to be known as the Gilmartin Subdivision, subject to all easements and rights-of-way now of record
or existing or indicated on this plat.
ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that this Subdivision Plat has been duly executed as required pursuant to Section
2.2.3(C)(3)(a) through (e) inclusive of the Land Use Code of the City of Fort Collins and that all persons
signing this Subdivision Plat on behalf of a corporation or other entity are duly authorized signatories
under the laws of the State of Colorado. This Certification is based upon the records of the Clerk and
Recorder of Larimer County, Colorado as of the date of execution of the plat and other information
discovered by me through reasonable inquiry and is limited as authorized by Section 2.2.3(C)(3)(f) of the
Land Use Code.
Attorney:
Address:
Registration No.:
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:
I, Steven D Wood, a Colorado Registered Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby state that this Subdivision Plat was
prepared from an actual survey under my personal supervision, that the monumentation as indicated hereon were
found or set as shown, and that the forgoing plat is an accurate representation thereof, all this to the best of my
knowledge, information and belief.
STEVEN D WOOD
Colorado Registered Professional Land Surveyor #
APPROVED AS TO FORM, CITY ENGINEER:
By the City Engineer of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado this
City Engineer
PLANNING APPROVAL:
By the Director of Planning the City of Fort Collins, Colorado this
150.0'
16' EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT
day of A.D.,
day of A.D.,
FOUND 3/4" REBAR AND 2.5"
ALUMINUM CAP P.L.S. 34174
STAMPED PER MONUMENT
RECORD FILED FEBRUARY
28, 2013
VICINITY MAP
1"=600'
1. Basis of bearings assuming the East line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9 as bearing North 00°00'00"
West, from a 2.5" aluminum cap at the Southeast corner of Section 9 stamped P.L.S. 34174 2012, to a 2 2"
aluminum cap stamped P.L.S. 29407 2008 at the East Quarter of Section 9 with all bearings contained
herein relative thereto:
2. Lineal units used in the preparation of this plat are based upon the U.S. Survey Foot.
3. Total area in square feet of easements dedicated to the public or the city by this plat. = 3954.54 Square
Feet. Total area in square feet of easements dedicated to the public or city that is being vacated by this plat.
= 0.00 Square Feet.
4. At the request of the client no Title Commitment was obtained for this plat.
T7N R69W
S9 �510
S16 S15
zoiz
S 341�j
ai
�
0
�
�
0
.�
.�
�
�
�
��
� O
' � :,_.�
�^` (�
W �
� �
�� �
� O
wU
�
�
V
J
0
0
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
M
�
0
�
0
�
0
O
U
�
�
>
0
J
�
�
�
N
�
�
��
>
w�
Z �
��
ZZz
W o0
z��
ODU
� E_ � w
o��
�
jZZ
, o00
u' UW
� � LL
Q QO
Z
�Q
g c�
ZZ
_ �; �
U Z�
�z�
Z
W ¢ J
�ai
z a�
�Q
W U
W Z W
> Z�W
� � �
' w �z
I Q ¢O
��
� z�
U Q�
O
� K�
� O
,�
J
i�
U �
0
Z
�
�
�
Q
0
}
m
0
W
� �
N W W
�O (nN d'(n
}
m
� � m
W Z z
--� � �
m
dN � �(�
� O
Q Q
0 Q
Z � LL
— J Q
I- J J
� = 0
Q�U
� � �
J Q (n
�t' � z
Z=J
Q � �
>�U
W O �
� �
r O
� �
�
Sheet
PLAT
Director of Planning
1 Of 1 Sheets
� � . ,, ���,
k�,"
�. �"j�` _ �
�., � :,�� :� �.�--�
. � �_
11�� 1 -
`� �iP . � . . 1 � `F �'' .
�� � . _ iIi'id'.
� �` .
� f .
� - __.=—�_ __ ____ -.
�' �'a�" •`' -
�.. � , — ���
�
� '
, �
, R i,'k � � ��II
�#, �-1 �! . �
� � �
�. �
: ;'r r �
�� ��� �'����,
� �, � r
� _��,�"r,�,_ ,s
� �.. '�5, ' � �Iyy
� �� ' � �
:�`� �, 1 _• ,
�. � �'
►'�rx 4 + ,..
_ R �y�y
, l� �
� `�■
�1_ —
.-t v 1 � �J.►. �
� � � . �, • w.,
� -� . �
0
`_o �4: �F Q
-� Y �I� ' z
� � ,.. �.
Y � �
4 � O?
�lY� � � � ��. �
wj �_,�C � ��
�,� �
. �.+ � � �..µ- �
' v
r t
i�� � �r ;'�� ��' � r'� �� (�. 1
1
•'� s, X �1
� 1,
� �
� �'ti _
�� �� . � �� ',
��, MULB��tR��ST
,1' `�:;' ,;'
�:. t `�� � � y���� � ..
'�''��� �, � 11 � �
-i I
,dfl�''�� e. , � . i
yr � ��� - �
�
�
�
O
L!7
�
�
�
X
1�
6
�
��� � ��,
� �' \ ��
�m 0�.'0(r .
\ � Q��, wQS���
� Q Z z �
Z--�, 1 -- '. .
d N
� N d', 1 I� y
� p �, CO �T�, �
p I� ., CO
F','i,' O O �� � 1 . "
� 1 �F . �l
� � � `� v M. : _
V Q
W �1
O �;:,, �k '�i�i.
�k C�; . C� t
� X X
... X _ �,j�� �� 4��... .
� �, �
y�11y+.,;
�� ,��
Y
-� F
� �� d��,�
,
,\ �� ��
� �,;p� + _ .
�� :'
r �
�
ly?:� I
J `� ��
/ �� �
i 4 �`� .` '
� . _ . � . w . � ._.
l -
1 ��
I ,��'�I_,
d il�lE c�,
FIGURE 3
Hiqh Risk
City Floodway - Area of 100-year floodplain with greatest depths and
fastest velocities.
City Flood Fringe - May Include:
- Areas of FEMA 100-year floodplain (FEMA Zones A, AE, AO, and AH)
-Areas of City 100-year floodplain including ponding areas and sheet
flow areas with average depths of 1-3 feet.
There is a 1% annual chance that these areas will be flooded.
Moderate Risk
May include:
- Areas of FEMA 500-year floodplain (FEMA Zone X-shaded).
- Areas of FEMA or City 100-year floodplain (sheet flow) with
average depths of less than 1 foot.
- Areas protected by Ievees from the 100-year flood.
Low Risk
�Areas outside of FEMA and City mapped 100-year and 500-year
floodplains. Local drainage problems may still exist.
N
W � E
S
City Flood Risk Map
This information is based on the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and the City of
Fort Collins Master Drainageway Plans. This letter does not imply
that the referenced property will or will not be free from flooding or
damage. A property not in the Special Flood Hazard Area or in a
City Designated Floodplain may be damaged by a flood greater
than that predicted on the map or from a local drainage problem
not shown on the map. This map does not create liability on the
part of the City, or any officer or employee thereof, for any damage
that results from reliance on this information.
All floodplain boundaries
are approximate. Cit of
0 20 40 80
�t CO«I IlS
GIS
120 160
� Feet
Printed: 02/02/2022
LEGEND
x
�
s ��;! '
•
n
�
,o�; �
�°
��
s�j
SF SF
w�
��
� �
� o
Q o
J ~
U o
� N
�O
NEW CONTOUR
sF SILT FENCE
���
OUTLOT
(EXIST GRADES/VEGETATION
TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED) �
�
SF
16' EMERGENCY ACCESS
EASEMENT
(PERMEABLE PAVEMENT)
EXISTING
TRANSFORMER
(CONFIRM)
SF
�
�
0
Q
Z
�
�
�
ti
0
�
�
rn
�
�
�
X
SF SF SF SF ' SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF� SF SF� S� SF SF SF SF SF Sf-�SF� SF —
� — i.6.00— EMERGENCY ACCESS � � � �o� �
� � � �— EASEMENT 150' E-W � � UTILITY
FROM S TAFT HILL R-O-W EASEMENT
a. � --- --- ----
N - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
�'� �' ------ —
— — — �
LOT1 � ----- 5`a
26162.75 Sq. Ft. � �
� 0.60 Acres ,� ��, -,��
� �
I ~�� UNIT 2 . BUILDING UNIT 1 T ACK
�, GRADE FOR ARKI G SP CES ( 0'x20' � ENVELOPE
� NE FLOW (GR VEL) I
PATTERN
�
�_ — — —5 ----- — — — — — — — —
ad� �— a��aCent g�rage � 3:1 SLOPE
ad�acent bu�ld�ng shed
(TYP) ALL �d�����,t ho��e
20' EMERGENCY SF SIDES SF
ACCESS EASEMENT
M
5072'
5078'
�
�� 5076'
�
z
� 5074'
Q
>
� 5072'
w
5070'
5068'
0+00
GILMARTIN MINOR SUBDIVISION
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
341 SOUTH TAFT H I LL ROAD
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
� LARIMER COUNTY PARCEL # 9709404005
�
>
Q
z
�
�
�
ti
0
�
ti
ti
�
�
X
PENN YLVANIA
�— S R E ET —�
57' RI HT OF WAY
EXISTING
GRADE
5075'
BFE 5075.94 UNIT 2
100-YR BASE FF 5076
FLOOD ELEVATION
BERM
5075'
� — — _ _ _ 4 � DUCT WORK
— — — _ 1 � � MIN DUCT 5075
— — �— BFE 5073.5
5074' — — — _
5073' — — —
0+20 0+40 0+60
ELEVATION TABLE
UNIT EXISTING GRADE
(UPSTREAM SIDE)
1
2
3
4
1 :1
BFE
1+00 1+20
5072.4' 1I�
SPREAD FOOTING W/ FOUNDATION WALL
(TOP OF FOOTER MIN 1' BELOW EXIST GRADE)
I I I
1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20
SECTION A - A'
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1" = 20'
VERTICAL 1" = 4'
(5:1 EXAGGERATION)
FF
EXISTING GRADE @ UPSTREAM SIDE OF UNIT
ESTIMATED ELEVATIONS - INTERPOLATED @UNIT N-S �
XS#.1477 AND XS#.1195 - BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS CROSS-SECTION
UNIT 1
FF 5075.4
DUCT WORK
� MIN DUCT 5074.4
J— BFE 5072.9
— — —
5071.6' � I I I
DOUBLE FF INTERIOR
UNITS COMMON WALL (TYP)
2+40 2+60 2+80
5071''�
5071.0'
5070.4'
3+00
�
c
N
I I
�,
�
U
�
�
�
SEAL
z
�
o�
U �
� W
A� W
h � �
v� � N .�
ZZ o��
O F' 0° � �
U W �0 � �
,� p v rn a�
�� ����
C7 H � z � ��
Z� w��a
r�, � °0 ° w �
��z�
Z O �' o ° @�
a
L7 � " �
�
W �
Z W
� ~
W �
O U
�
� u:.�
�� � �
,�
\\','i.=
I��
Q
�
O
� Q
I� �
I� �
� Q
� U
� �
� �
� a
x O
� �
0 �
�
�
�
M
�
U
w
0
�
�
�
a
O
�
H
�
O
U
�
O
I-�-�I
O
W
�
�
w
�
�
�
�
Q
L�
�
�
�
W �
J �
�
�
�
w
w
_
�
DRAWN BY: SCALE:
PAS ASNOTED
CHECKED BY: DATE:
ps 06/04/24
SHEET NUMBER:
Figure 4
SHEET INDEX:
JOB NUMBER:
M
M
r
�
Q
0
z
�
0
m
}
�
�
w
�
0
�
�
•
M
-� ,_� o0
�4
0
BERM 5072'
�5% SLOPE AWAY
FROM BLDG (TYP)
BFE 5071.59' BFE 5070.72
/
�-------
�
�
>
Z
�
IN
ti
0
ti
0
�
rn
ti
I�
r
�
X ��
�
�
� �
�
O
I..L
J
I J
2
L.L
�
� _
�
�
�
(1)
,�"
�
�>
�
�
i
Z
�
�
�
0
ti
0
�
�
0
r
�
X
6" VERTICAL
CURB
3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40
GILMARTIN MINOR SUBDIVISION
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
341 SOUTH TAFT H I LL ROAD
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
LARIMER COUNTY PARCEL # 9709404005
Q
U�
o�
w
L.L
�
H �
i`
N
�
SS TAP \
3
�
�
�
5� �
❑
s�
��
�
�
,
�a��
^�
��
�
U �
W M
�
i �
� O
Q O
J ~
U o
� N
� O
�
b
�
OUTLOT
(EXIST GRADES/VEGETATION
TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED)
��
�
PENNSYLVANIA
�- STREET —►
57' RIGHT OF WAY
�
�.
I�
�
�
QI
�
�
�
�
I
I
�
LOT 1
26162.75 Sq. Ft.
0.60 Acres
�
w
4" CURB STOP & METER
(TYP EACH UNIT)
Parking Spaces
� ---
_
�
2-GANG ELECTRIC DUPLEX
METERS (1 DEDICATED �RENTALS)
TO EACH UNIT)
\
00
T
e
w
� 5.00' —
—S / SS " SS—
>
UTILITY �
a
EASEMENT �
�
0
30 00' }
SET ACK �
�
W
a
0
�
a
TELEP ONE AC ESS
tel
�2- GAS ME ER�
6 '
r�-
�
�
��
_ �- -- - �—
- - -- �- -
- —� _ _. .�_ _ _ - � �� � — � —. � — — � — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
LEGEND
-�,n»��� � �i,��;
9
tel
w
SS SS SS
OVERHEAD WIRE
UNDERGROUND GAS
UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
UNDERGROUND WATER
UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER
w w
oo�
I
� I
�
�
�
I
�I
Q I
J �
�
W
� �
� �
�-
>
� �
z
�
�
� 3
U
i� I
3
I
� 3/
O�/
L.L
J
2 3
� �
� —
Q �
� �
Q
= U
� ��
�
0
C!)
0
v�', I �a
3
I I
�
1�
— —� —
I�
J
J
_
� �
Q
H
�
��
�
w
�
- - - �
�
�
Q �
J �
U
�
w
��I
�"'
>
N �
� �
�
�
3
r3
3/4" WATER TAP
�
�
3
z
O
�
�
�
Q 3
U
��
FIGURE 5
�
�
u
�
�
�
�
�
SEAL
U
Z
�
z
o�
U �
� W
A� W
H � �
v� � N .�
Z Z o � c
O ~���
U W � � o ��
,� p v � a�
�� ����
C7 E� � z � �o,
Z -�-� wJ ��
��m�w�
� U Z cn
Z O �' o ° @�
d
� � � �
�
W -�-i
� W
� ~
W �
O U
�
/� l �
, �
!:�
i% ,.�
;, ;:�
�� �':�
� ;:��
�
0 O
� Q
� �
F� �
r� �
��T O
M-�-1 �
� z
E� a
� o
� �
O °
L�
�
d'
M
H
U
W
O
�
d
�
�
��-I
�
�
�
�
�
w
J
H
H
H
W
w
S
�
DRAWN BY: SCALE:
PAS ASNOTED
CHECKED BY: DATE:
04/10/24
SHEET NUMBER:
C 103
SHEET INDEX:
JOB NUMBER:
10' MIN EXISTING
BETWEEN WATER TRANSFORMER
AND 4" SS LINES (CONFIRM)
3' MIN EXISTING
BETWEEN WATER POWER POLE
& ELEC LINES (SERVICE CONNECT) ��
w w w w
I 6.00'
SS�S -- SS --SS-- SS -- SS'�
. � o.00' � i o.00' /
UNIT 2 BUILDING UNIT 1
ENVELOPE
<�
�o \
Attachment A
NRCS Custom Soil Resources Report
USDA United States
= Department of
Agriculture
�I RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
tr
• �
. r
_ � ��:
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Larimer County
Area, Colorado
341 SOUTH TAFT HILL RD
� r �
�-� *..�. - ..y •�
�r �
� ' �I
� 5��_r • � _ ' � r
�f
►
— -- a
r7
i �
� �, � � � '
4 F �,►'_ , �
ti �'- �'� "'�.�.'s` - -
i �,� � � � ` � � � I � L . E, - -
-'� '��, ' ". �4- ! � . �
r � - - . �
� �" Ei � � �� � � � '�� ti��: �
,�' - _� ` �
,� �
, �,
�. �
�� a:
. . �� .�� .� � _ _
F , i �s� - .� ■
�' • � - - __ .Mi
� .�A � ��i - .. „ �1 i
0�■■�■■■�■■ 1 G 0 ft
����
�
�
�•
��
�
March 16, 2023
P reface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in aIl its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface........................................................................................
How Soil Surveys Are Made ......................................................
SoilMap ......................................................................................
SoilMap ...................................................................................
Legend.....................................................................................
MapUnit Legend ......................................................................
Map Unit Descriptions ..............................................................
Larimer County Area, Colorado ............................................
3—Altvan-Satanta loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes ...............
74—Nunn clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes ......................
References..................................................................................
.......................... 2
.......................... 5
.......................... 8
..........................9
........................10
........................ 11
.........................11
........................ 13
........................ 13
........................15
........................17
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soii scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of ineasurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet Iocal needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
C�
Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
E%3
Z Z
O� "
� �
V O
OOSZ6Yfi 06bZ646 08tZ6b7 OLbZ6bh 097Z647 OStZ647 067Z64h OEbZfi4h OZ4Z64D 06bZ6hG ODbZ6bG
M „£5 ,9 oSOT - - � � � � . � � � M „£S ,9 oSOi
� o
� �
� — �
_ �� � � —
�' ` - - �
� h , �
,
� �
� � � � � .� -�
. ;�,
-� ���,� �� � .' . � �;'
� , :�_ � : - � -�
� �
- ��
� �� � _ � �
1 � � � • ��
� � ,.� � � �- �
� - .
� i �_ � � �
�
� � � ,, p � - �
�, _ � -
V 4
L
� Q �j ��I� � . �R �
�
� � o
� C m � ' {� I. �
I..L O � ' � � ' � � �
c� � $ * - $ �
� �
0
O `�� �� � 01 � N r�
� �'i .�
� �� o
� � - y'� F �
U � _! —� N
, _ ,-
_ _ ,� 9f �
� � ..�~t _ I III �
� al � �
� � tr y `� � � �
� � � �
; � �i in � � �
�J'� � ti �- �
� i � �.�' � � x �
� ,�� : �,.-' ^ � � �
� ' �I L � � � �
+� � � +.�.: � � — � � �
� ti a � �
�
� _ �i '.� -� a
� r-' ti o �s
� . , . � ; -� _ _ > � � @
, �
� ' },�� ���, —� � �
� � ��.� �. �
�LI IIV � � � . O� � ��i-
�
Ni � - � � �
� � � �t. *r � y . 4 �. ��� . � �_ � 4 � •�
■
S * -"- � ���
v � •� � r a �q
_ .,.� - �_ ►_ - • = c� a
� � + °p. a a
, � - . � � � o o �
o ' .�• - - - � o
� —� ' � � J � _ �'r - �
� O �.1 - r,(%)' z
M��T,L o50T ' I� I I 4I � I � �� , I� M„T,L oSOT
ODSZ&bb OGbZ6bb 08bZ6bb OLbZ6bb 036Z64b OSbZ6bG ObbZ6bb O�bZ6bb OZbZ6bb OlbZ6bt 007Z6bb
z z
� �
�i �S
� �
�
O
Q
N
�
�
U
i
�
O
�
N
�
O
�
C
0
�
7
U
Z
�
Q
�
O
Z
a
G
�
Z
ll.�
i�
W
J
a
aC
C
�
N
n
n
�
E
�
3
O
7
O�+
N
�
a
�
O
U
N
�
�
i
N O
0
° o
<I'
L �
H
�
� O �
� � �
�
V � O a
� U y N
U � � �
m �
C V � �
'a �—
a -o �6 m
� C � C
� � N �
o� � o
� C � L
��n3 v�
� O' O C
U � L �
� � N �
N
L O O �
� (p O �
� a
a
T � N
� y N O
y �
� O � @
� p� � ""
C � y
O "� � '�
C (6 � N
N y � �
� C
� U �
�� o. `° ai
N d C (p
C�
w E � $ �
ai
U
N
�
N
m
>
N
�
0
�
N
�
d
N
�
.O
�
m
>
�
m
�
�
�
N
�
N
U
�
U
�
Z
Q
❑
�
�
L O
��
0
� �
� �
N in
m =
N N
C �
�
� (9
N �
C
U .�
7 tn
� �
O �
Q �
N �
H O
O
a
�
0
UN
0
� N
� �
Q p_
w �c
7 � O
U �
� ,o
� i
m>
J �
� �
� Q
Q @
T �
N Q
� T
� �
� �
a`�i
U
Q
N
�
0
O
m
N
U
�
N
�
N
a�
4
�
N �
N p7
N @
�C
7 O
Q O
m o
� O
— O
O �
�r
�
N
�
I
N
O
N
N
�
-o
�
s
d
N
�
O
O
t
a
m
N
3
N
�
�
�
N
.�
N
�
� N
m
� o
N
N
3 � o
� �
� O �
C �
— Y �
O N E
� � N
� � .
� � ...: c
L �
U � N �
o � �>
L �
3 L m �
O � Q S
T
a� �
� � N �
N
� � � �
m � � �
� � � �
�w �
o �C
o �
O �O7 N j
O 'O � Q
O 'O n (II
L C N �
O. N
L � � �
� �
O,Q � �
N E N �
H ° .� m
Q
�
�
O
�
N
L
�
Q
m
E
L
m
�
O
�
U
�
N
�
N
.L.-�
C .N�
O �
T �
� �
m c`�o
N �
a E
N
>
N
�
C h
o �
�� �
` M
y �
c �
o a
U W
N O
a�
i �
� i
� �
� �
� �
� . >
w J
N a'
Z � �
T ...
fl- � T
� � �
� (n N
� O C
U � a
Q
7
N
c� � U
o °'
N.L.-�
� � �
m r �9 a�
Q .� � �
� "O � y.., -O
� j N -O .�
� .Q � N 7
� Q m � m
� L > � �
� � � -o m
N � � O N
@ � L
� � Q � f6
N p � �
�. N � � �
� � � U U
i � '� � �
7 (/7 U O N
� � � Q�
i O
U
� N d � O
N Q � C
� L � N �p
� L c0 N �
�
w �
3 � � �
� � (p � U
� O N N �
U U � @
C
Q .�? �0 � 7
(6 O u� Q U
� a � Q m
�
� �
J (0 T �^
(6 � � Q
d 11 �-% L m
� N � � N N O
(0 O �' c N = N � laq O
� Q Q p J N � � O p L
a � �- m E �° o � � a
c >. � a� 'ci m m `� � o m �
O_ � N � = fl. y � C ��0 � � � p N
(o (n > � O ln � (� O �' � � � J ,o Q
� r '
d o 0
�,M1Y� .. ... �� � , y H + � � �
' c
� �
3 � m
�
N
Q O
� @
a �
i ¢
d
c
O
N
Q
�
�
� N N d
T � C � � (n
d J � N � � "O
� � ` � �
y Q
C C C ` Q Q ?� f0 Q > O � Q
> > > � ._ a� w, � 3 u� � a� � � o o w o
n a a � a a ❑ a >, o o � � m � � � >, � � a
m �o m � o o a� �O m a� = �'- .c o c O m >. � o o �
U C � > �
(n (n (n 'p 0] 0] U CJ C:) C� J J � � � d � (n (A fn (n (n (n
a
m �yy wr
_. "1 aUi .J � ,+'R. ._ ''�� .-, r.a I , � i �::? li .' 9��1 �� . . .��. . . . oa
Vl � p, '
�� � �
y
O
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Altvan-Satanta loams, 0 to 3 0.1 16.8%
percent siopes
74 Nunn clay loam, 1 to 3 percent 0.7 83.2%
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
Map Unit Descriptions
0.8 100.0%
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11
Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12
Custom Soil Resource Report
Larimer County Area, Colorado
3—Altvan-Satanta loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: jpw2
Elevation: 5,200 to 6,200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F
Frost-free period: 135 to 150 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Altvan and similar soils: 45 percent
Satanta and similar soils: 30 percent
Minor components: 25 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Altvan
Setting
Landform: Benches, terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Mixed alluvium
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 10 inches: loam
H2 - 10 to 18 inches: clay loam
H3 - 18 to 30 inches: loam
H4 - 30 to 60 inches: gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding.� None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 10 percent
Available water supp/y, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: R067BY002C0 - Loamy Plains
Hydric soil rating: No
13
Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Satanta
Setting
Landform: Terraces, structural benches
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope, tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Mixed alluvium and/or eolian deposits
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 9 inches; loam
H2 - 9 to 18 inches: loam
H3 - 18 to 60 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage c/ass: Well drained
Runoff c/ass: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 10 percent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3c
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: R067BY002C0 - Loamy Plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Nunn
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Ecological site: R0676Y002C0 - Loamy Plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Larim
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Ecological site: R0676Y063C0 - Gravel Breaks
Hydric soil rating: No
Stoneham
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R0676Y002C0 - Loamy Plains
Hydric soil rating: No
14
Custom Soil Resource Report
74—Nunn clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2tlpl
Elevation: 3,900 to 5,840 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 17 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F
Frost-free period: 135 to 160 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Nunn and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Nunn
Setting
Landform: Terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Pleistocene aged alluvium and/or eolian deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: clay loam
Bt - 9 to 13 inches: clay loam
Btk - 13 to 25 inches: clay loam
Bk1 - 25 to 38 inches: clay loam
Bk2 - 38 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
S/ope: 1 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage c/ass: Well drained
Runoff c/ass: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer fo transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 7 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.1 to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 0.5
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
15
Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: R067BY042C0 - Clayey Plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Heldt
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R067BY042C0 - Clayey Plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Satanta
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Terraces
Landform position (three-dimensionalJ: Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R0676Y002C0 - Loamy Plains
Hydric soil rating: No
�
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.n res. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=n res142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.n res. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y 87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=n res 142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/land use/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb 1043084
17
Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=n res 142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=n res 142 p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/I nternet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_052290. pdf
18
Attachment B
Mile High Flood District
Hydrologic Calculations
Calculation of Peak Runoff using Rational Method
�.���roo.eea,oa v „ 9sn c��.r �`°m'�aa`` `'�t`' � .i„ti,�i �no�,�a� , , . � � �.,,�� .,_ .
iom� -� ,m
celsmNs�lware.hro��aloremae�aues ,al�.-rzs t��+ � d , , I R' c nv�l��l ��/rr
�ac 6t���r nV. +��)� �- 4 a.�, .. _. o r�l ana nte Y 9 on oe o�ent `_`_"� P�� I t!(�/x1=CIA