HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPRING CREEK VILLAGE PUD - FINAL - 2-87O - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS (9)�- ,
City of Fort Collins
Commurii Plannin and Environmental S-ervices
tY g
Current Planning
20 August 1997
Rick Hafifman
Hattman Associates
145 West Swallow Road
Fort Collins, Colorad.o 80525
Dear Rick:
City staff has reviewed the Spring Creek Village P.U.D. Final, #2-870, and
offers the following comments:
1. The Zoning Department offered the following:
a) Site plan needs to show building dimensions and distances to the
nearest lot line from building envelope.
b) A sidewalk/path should be required form the two cul-de-sacs to the
trail leading to Spring Creek Trail.
c) More notes are required on the site plan=parking numbers, single
family setbacks, etc.
d) Development is located in neighborhood sign district, and therefore,
must show wall sign elevations of non-residential buildings.
e) General note #9 regarding signs violates the neighborhood sign
district. It is likely the proposal wiU not be allowed as much signage as
is indicated.
f) Landscape note #4 refers to phasing. Please show phase lines on all
plans.
2. TCI of Fort Collins offered the following:
a) TCI of Fort Collins would like to see Tract C platted as "utility, access
drainage easement" to allow for rear utility service if needed.
b) There is no utility easement between Strider Way and lot #23.
3; Comments from Building Inspections are attached.
4. The Natural Resources Department offered the following comments:
a) The offices in lot 32 appear to be too close (approximately 20') to the
bike trail. Likewise for the single family lots 1=9.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 •(970) 221-6750
FAX (970) 221-6378 � TDD (970) 224-6002
t -
� �
b) There need to be connections for pedestrians and bicycles from the
cul-de-sacs to the bike trail spur.
c) The entire site needs a second access point from the Spring Creek
bike trail (or enhance the one shown).
d) The sidewalk entry point from South Shields Street needs to be
"dressed up" so that it places more emphasis on the pedestrian and
integrates into the overall design of the proposal.
e) There is concem regarding the configuration of the single family lots.
Will they have yards? If not, there needs to be some communal
outdoor activities.
f) Please design the landscaping along the entire east boundary to be
native material in a naturalistic design to match the existing wetlands
and drainage channel. Don't use pine t�ees, rather, fry chokecherry,
wild plum and narrowleaf cottonwood. Along Spring Creek, species—
grasses, trees, shrubs, flowers—must be native to the "Plains" zone of
Fort Collins. A copy of the Fort Collins Native Plants Handbook is
included in the packet. Also, the rock material that gets used in the
outfall to Spring Creek should match the existing gray rock along the
drainage channel.
5. The Police Department offered the following comments:
a) Strider Way needs renamed—sound-a-likes already exist.
b) Gandoff Court needs renames (Gandolf already exists).
6. The Mapping Department offered #he following comments:
a) This area was originally platted as Wind Trail Condominiums. On this
plat a street was spelled Gandalf--=this plat spells it as Gandoff—which �
is correct?
b) The title should state that this is a replat of Pulse PUD, Filing One.
c) Stuart Street should be West Stuart Street (Mapping)
7. Comments from Forestry are attached.
8. Comments from the Engineering Department are attached.
9. Comments for the Stormwater Utilify are attached.
10. Comments from the Water/Wastewater Utility are attached.
11. Comments from Transportation Planning are attached.
12. The Advance Planning Department offered the following comments:
� a) Please move the main walkway spine to hit the entrance and widen
the raised platform. This would become a great walkway spine.
,-
�
� -�
b) There are some questions about the apparent paths on the landscape
plan. It shows some disconnections. What is the access from the
east?
c) Please see the included red-lines for additional comments.
13. The Poudre Fire Authority offered the following comments: .-�
a) Proposed commercial buildings exceeds 5,000 square feet for type V
construction and must be fire contained, consfruction type upgraded,
orfire sprinklered.
b) Proposed 12,000 square foot office building is out of access by fire
code definition and must be fire sprinklered.
c) An additional fire hydrant may be required at the northwest comer of
the proposed supermarket that would also serve as a fire hydrant for
the proposed 12,500 square foot retail store.
14. Park Planning states "confer with Craig Foreman on the connection to the
City trail system. Neighborhood and community park fees will be assessed
on residential units."
15. Traffic Operations offered the following comments: -
a) This does not meet the automobile LOS requirements.
b) We will support a variance to not extend Hobbit into the Sheely
addition.
c) All short-term improvements need to be included in the development
agreement.
d) There is a need to evaluate altemative access to Hobbit.
e) You will need to provide a 1to 20 scale of the Stuart/Shields
intersection for the redesign of the traffic signal.
16. Comments from Light and Power are attached.
17. Comments frorn Transfort are attached.
18. The Current Planning Department offered the following comments:
_
a) Final plans must be in substa.ntial compliance with the approved
preliminary plan. Substantial compliance is defined in the LDGS as a
final plan that does not: change the general use ofi character of the
development, increase the number of residential dwelling units by
more than one (1 %) percent, contain changes which would normally
cause the development to be disqualified under the applicable criteria
of this chapter. The addition of two units results in an 'increase in the
number of residential dwelling units that is greater than 1%, and
therefore, the final plan as submitted is not in substantial compliance
with the preliminary. Under Ordinance No. 161, preliminary plans may
not be amended, therefore, it becomes necessary to remove these two
� �
new units so that the final is in substantial compliance with the
approved preliminary plan.
b) Bike racks need to be located in front of the supermarket, retail store,
office/retail and office space
c) Please provide a detail of the trash collection areas.
d) The sidewalk along Shields street appears to be close to the parking
lots in areas. There needs to be adequate separation (landscaping) to
define the pedesfrian space from the parking area.
e) Parking islands need to be added to the parking lot located to the west
of Strider Way, south of Hobbit Street as well as the parking area for
the supermarket. Please see the attached red-lines for these
locations.
f) Trail connections need to be made from the two cul-de-sacs.
g) What is the primary (dominant) color of the split face rock material
used on the exterior of the buildings?
h) Please provide some benches in front of the supermarket and
retaiVoffice areas.
i) Please see the attached red-lines for additional comments.
This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be
forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to
review this request.
Please provide a written response to each of the above stated comments with
the submittal of plan revisions. Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have any
quesfions or concems that are related to the comments. If you would like to
schedule a meeting, please call me as soon as possible.
As you are aware, the City of Fort Collins Current Planning Department recently
i_mplemented a new development review process. Under that new process,
revisions may be submitted at any time. . With the submittal of revisions, please
include the enclosed redlined plans. Please contact me for the number of
revisions required.
Sincerely,
;��.��'�t-�-.�
Leanne A� Harter, AICP
City Planner
xc: Sheri Wamhoff
Shear Engineering
File/Project Planner
�
�
Pl�OJECT
C OMl�//IENT S HEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
_
DATE: July 17, 1997 DEPT; Bldg Inspec
PROJECT:
PLA►NNER: -
#2-870 Spring
(LDGS) Final
Leanne Harter
Creek Vi-llage P.U.D.
Al1 comments must be received no later xhan the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, August 13, 1997 �
The site shall be accessible to persons with disabilities in accardance with Uniform
Building Code Section 3103 and UBC Appendix Section 3106, A designated and
marked "accessible route of travel" among all the buildings on the site and building
exits and entrances and the public way (public sidewalk) is shown. Accessible roufes
shall comply with ANSI A117.1-1992 with running slopes no greater than 1:20 and
cross slopes no steeper than 1:5Q. Where routes cross lanes for vehicle traffic, thsy
shall be designated and marked as a cross walk. Proyide parking and signs per
Appendix Section 3107. Parking and access aisles shall eomply with ANSI A117.1-
1992 with slopes no greater than 1:50 in any direetion.
Buildings shall be designed to comply with the Fort Collins Nonresidenfial Energy Code
(ASHRAE 90.1 with local amendments) or residential.energy code (MEC 1995 with
local amendments) whichever is applicable.
Food serviee establishments require approval by the Larimer County Health
Department at the time of building permit application. Please contact Jim Devore at
970:498:6775 for submittal information.
More..:
Date: �bu,�U:a7� D � ��t �1 �
� :
GHECK HERE � YOU W1SH TO RECIIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
Pl� S�e — � � — �
_ UblitY _ Re�iue Uh�IY _ Iands�e
£,:
City of Fort Collins
�
#2-870 Spring Creek Village PUD
page 2.
�
Buildings which exceed 5000 square feef in area must be equipped with an aufomatic
fire suppression system or be compartmentalization by fire-resistiye construction as
required by Section 3802, Uniform Building Code as�amended by the City of Fort
Collins.
The plat indicates that a the proposed dwelling units will be single family dwelling units
with each unit on an individually owned lot.
Section 504 of the 1991 edifion of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City of
Fort Collins requires that exterior walls of one- and two-family dwellings located closer
than 3 feet from a property line be of one-hour fire-resistive construction: No openings
are allowed in such exterior walls. A parapet extending 30-inches above the roof
surface is required unless the structu�e complies with the exceptions to UBC Section
1710. Projecfions, such as cornices, eave overhangs or exterior balconies shall not
extend over the property line and must comply with UBC Sections 1710 and 504.
. � �
PI�OJECT
C 010//II�/IE�TT S HEE'T'
Current Planning .
___ _
DATE: July 17, 1997 DEPT: Forestry
PROJECT: #2-870 Spring Creek Village P.U.D.
(LDGS) Final
PLANNER: Leanne Harter
All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting;
Wednesday, August 13, 1997
— S-1- v� e, e,-�- Ty� c. c L o vn w� �.,-i �
r��� S�i-�cc.�- Tv�e.�. }� �-<<:., �:,.:-,�. s�o,��� �0{ c�1 �-e` wP,�c.��.,:
�;.. �`T r c, c. :: �� c ��:. s�, o � 1 d b�c � c. � e e�- e c.� �N or w� -}-� � �
G''��4L�tc..� � iS�. Qfht1�1\C,i���.i "�"�CCS :.�\DV�� �b`t' �� :1b�c.'
A:. S`�' N C, �G ^�-. TH C'4' �
? V S e ca � r 5��': c. ; c-� o�!.� �. S q S'i"v� c�e. -�-
`{' << <„ •�., �,� C �G� :, v� �IA�4 �'..�" .� V` G'.-' '� �� S � �
3
Ple� L� S'}'�n C K•� `�`t!N t C S � t� w�te„ L��c, .r, t.-�. ai 1 �L � G�.. ,.. (:a
Date:
� IR E.�-�t s.-�- u� e. a� ��`f-�'o�..,� a o C.l ;, � Lv i l I b c... S +� `a'` �'�` `1
a���. t:.e. ��- -� n NJ G`#-1J N e� � 2, v� r;; .
�- Tk.�.. �r. �:` � a.... �, _� � Tef e E. S A�.c. t e;., 4v� � te v-�- �. �.! �., da �i- �..1 T'�
�' �+... -i C r R 1 �� n 2 " v � ,,� � H �-�� r.. , -�- 'f` c �' -• ;. �....,. �. I C� cn �, -f-• c' .a .,.�,
5 �.J � � •, � F, I . ST l.� Q _ � rn c:.. �c � � -i- e- � �n S �. �a � , �- �... i� � ..1 t:,. u � "�'- Lt
Gv� p-��R... 4-= F''C"G {.e'„
- A Nnv� wc�.pl¢
- N e�,. Po.h�- P�..w►
— M v A c. G v��a �
T�^ 'C �C. G � pv� �
� � �-4- t, �'� e�.. �w � c
� U P � ��
_.---..
CHECg HERE � YOU W1SH T� RECIIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS �
Pl� Si� � Qih� ��. a
_ .........�,. �aa c Rq�olt
-
— U� —�� �� City of Fort Collins
, -
�
�- ��t �t -�0 1( o w�'H S P¢ c t e S o-� T�► �e �c S�c, v e c� G t_ -i-= .
�j�Ow�HS GO�G�i�f�v�S �v�c� �GxA�✓►1-e���.�l, �1 $� lMOv<'�G���..� �
���' �' S. T 1^ ¢.j �.`�, �Ovl c.� 14 e u`�e �..Q �� S hw ti l I h v v�.s ��e .n s
�'� (.1 ✓.c+-i •r c,'{-��/ � o Gd."t..� oM v.
� w� v i� �� a � L r C,,, � C.� ✓• �
q � -��w, � � � _�u� � �_ �a s k
p, „� y p,,, P i�n•�„
— � u G, v+ c n �, a Gi � v r ,.h � �-i �- o � S (•, �, c.l �c. TH •e •c S A � c i t �: � .S � `�! � �/
� al t,l � `�- 1 � g G't.�.ic� i �i-1 aM , � '�'�1 l�'� s '�-� "�` �t t � ( G �
- L� N�e .�'..., f�1 �� _' � N � I� j tN O A l C
-- ►rl �, � t G.. �S c � � — � w� e� � c G � �- � ��'� `+
` l
... � ���. � �.. I �
� � i� � �: 'f' t N S TY+ C. � � �1 `�" �� .Q �-. L? 4'��-1n LL� 'C' . � '� � �.= s � 4.� M....,
� �" •�, � � � v � [" r <<�i b � a✓� o � � G.,.; t" ..� Cl •-� C.� � �.•1 �,...,,, .;... {
�� c � c i L �.. �, �.1 � G �. � �t.. v� o �i- e S .G v+ a ,+,,� � i-} c. �, �n .r �. T��. ,c • , • �
'� -� e o � �, � c� t, + � ^ '� �.� .c ,..� -� �
� v.. �-. E c
_ p � „ 1�. � � � � r -�- , � ! a .� � s �„� �t �a � � �, � � �;'�., � .,... , �! b .`
f:l I A��• r, �-i. �....: � t l.� C.- c. 4< cn t?� .-� .`, 6t a e.i � ')"�,.� �c r_ � � e. :-- �-
(�..^ H e.i ..u�. �' ...� -� � �a � �J . �
❑
' ' . � �
�- � � � � �
P3 Prior to construetion, all protected trees shall have orange protection barrier fencing
erected, which as a minimum are supported by 1" x 1" or similar sturdy stock, for
sluelding of protected trees, no closer than six (6) feet from the trunk or one=half (1�) of
the drip line which ever is greater. Within this protection zone there shall be no
movement of equipment or storage of equipment, materials, debris, fill, or cut unless
approved by the Ciry Forester.
�'S During the construcdon stage of development, prevent cleaning of eguipment or material
or the storage or disposal of waste materials such as paints oils, solvents, asphalt,
concrete, mortar, or any other material harmful to the life of a tree within the drip line of
any protected tree or group of trees.
?,� All existing trees shall be pruned to Ciry of Fort Collins medium prune standards.
E3 Existing trees marked for protection and preservation shall not be removed.
- ��- - �: ��=�::-- _ -
: .r ,-;
• '
� y ,�'� ����., .� '
�
City of Fort Collins
Forestry Division
Street Tree List
1. Norway Maple ce nlantanoide�
(Deborah, Emerald Queen)
ii • : '- - :- 'a._•_
3. Hackberry
4. Manchurian Ash
(Species, Mancana)
5. Blaek Ash
(Fall Gold)
Celtis occidentalis
Fraxinus mandshurica
raxi u ni�ra
6: Green Ash 'nu nennsylvanica
(Marshall, Patmore, Prairie Spire)
7. Honeylocust ledi ' �iacanthos 'mermis
(Shademaster, Skyline)
8. Kentucky Coffeetree Gyinnocladus ' . 'cus
9. Bur Oak
uer u macrocT
�C�ih �ak...-/� ue u -mue�enber�ii-�
11. English Oak Quercus robur
(Species, Skymaster)
�J
12. Littleleaf Linden � cordata
(Chancellor, Dropmore, Glenleven, Greenspire, Norlin; Olympic, Shamrock)
13. American Linden 'li americana
(Species, Boulevard, Frontyard, Legend, Redmond, Sentry)
1 Am can E
• - .
.
(Speci� randon, e�Harmony, •�n, Valley Forge)
Approved cultivars or varieties are listed in parenthesis under each tree name. The term species -=-_
indicates that plants grown from seed as well as the named cultivazs may be used. -. -- -- _____ ___
_._ -- :n...� .-�
_ _. .._�- ---- _ . , , ___
. � ,.: 3';• ,-.
' ��_� n ��
_ -" � j"'.' !'.� Yh" +_`"��
... :-:-3 1�i�at3.=�b4k�i�i�� a. ..
Current
r�
U
0
I)ATEe ,Tulyli, 1997 I)EPT': Engineerir�g
����C�. #2=870 Spring Creek Village P.U.D. - (LDGS)Final
PLAI�II�T�R: Leanne �arter
All comments must be received by no later than the stacf, f review
meeting: Wedraesday, �lugusi 13, 1997
Spring Creek Village PUD - Fina1
In General
August 16,.1997
e Stuart Street from Shields Street to Strider Way should be designed as a collector without
parking based on the traf�c volumes. This may have an effect on the layout of the office
buildings. It may also b.e necessary to design Strider Way as a connector.
� No parking stalls shall be within 40 feet or 50 feet (depends on volumes) from the flowline
of the travel way. See Table 5 of the Street Standards. Tlus affects parking areas off of
Stuart Street and Strider Way.
• Northern most access point into parking lot o_ff of Strider Way should be eliminated.
Elimination of this will allow for parking stalls 'in the northeastern corner to remain.
o Bus pull out needs to be designed in accordance with Transit Design Guidelines to
accommodate two busses:
• A right turn lane on Sluelds Street at Stuart needs to be provided.
• Pedestrian improvements at the Stuart Street and Shields Street intersection need to be
shown (a11 corners as necessary to accommodate pedestrian movement through the
intersection).
• The tra.ffic study indicates that the walk along Shields Street should be a 10 foot wide
bike/ped path. Plans are only indicating an 8 foot sidewalk. Is the 10 foot necessary in
order to meet the Pedestrian level of seivice standards?
(Continued on next page)
U
Date:_ /
Check here if you v�
t/Plat L'
�/LJtility v
����CT
�0 1�1T ��E 1
� Signature: �il��-
to receive copies of revisions
� _ Drainage report _ Other
31ine Utility tr�andscape
� �
Spring Creek Village PUD - Final (page 2 of 2) August 16, 1997
� This area has already been platted. The existing street ROW will need to be vacated prior
to area being platted again. A ROW vacation will need to go to City Council. The
diagrams for the proposed vacations should be submitted with the final utility plans for
processing, although the vacation will not be taken to City Council until the project has
final Planning and Zoning Board Approval: P and Z Board approval will need to be
eonditional based on the completion of the utility plans and the vacation of the existing
ROW.
Site/ Landscape plan
• Correct spelling and grammatical errors in general notes as indicated on plans
o Eliminate all street trees from the northern side of Gandoff Court as a sewer line is shown
_ . _ _
to run between the curb and the sidewalk precluding the placement of trees in this area.
� A few other trees have been marked out as they also conflict with shown water or sewer
lines.
Plat
� Additional easements will need to be provided along both sides of Gandoff Court to
accommodate utilities that are normally placed behind the curb where water/ sewer
facilities are being placed.
• Need to define what the tracts are and who is to own and maintain them.
_ _ __ _ .
• Additional ROW needs to be provided on Shields Street - 57.5 feet half ROW per new
street standards plus 12 more feet where right turn is needed.
� Additional ROW needs to be provided on Stuart Street where it should be designed as a
collector.
Utility Plans
� All access drives off of the publie streets shall be built with concrete to the property lines
with maximum 15 foot radii.
o Need to make sure that the sewer line behind the sidewalk (south side) on Gandoff Court
is located a minimum of 3 feet behind the ROW. This will allow for the placement of
street trees within the parkway, meeting the 10 foot separation requirement from said
sewer line.
• Plans are incomplete and were not checked/ reviewed in detail.
o Items to note though: What is the width of Shield Street? It doesn't even appear to be
meeting old standards.
• Provide striping plan for Shields Street and Stuart Street.
• See Plans for additional comments.
• J , � �
Vacation of
R.i�hts�of-vVay and Easernents
A request for vacation of easements or rights-of-way may be submitted to the Devetopment Review
Center at any time. The processing time for a routine vacation request is approximately 8 weeks. The
following procedure should be followed in vacating a public right-of-way or easement:
St- en l: Application ,
An application is filed with the Development Review Center at any time, containing the following
information: .
A. A written request with details describing the proposed vacation and justification of why the
proposed vacation is necessary. •
B. A sketch that accurately shows the proposed vacation.
Sten 2: Routing for Comments
Thc Development Review Center staff routes the vacation request to relevant City departments and
public agencies for their review. Approximately 2 weeks later, the review comments are returned to
the Development Review Center and a recommendation�is made by the staff on therequest. The staff
of the Development Review Center will conCact the applicant to discuss these comments and the
recommendation. Additional information to support the request may be required.
St_ eo 3; Legal Description
If City staff supports the request for vacation, the a_pplicant shall be required to submit a legal
descripfion of the proposed vacation prepared by a licensed land surveyor.
Steo 4: City Council or Planning and Zoning Board Consideration �
Upon receipt of the legal descriptio.n, the Development Rev"iew Center staff will prepare a written
reporE for City Council (for� right-of-way vacations) or Planning and Zoning Board (for easement
vacations). City Council will consider an ordinance for the vacation request and approve or deny the
request on first reading. If approved on first reading, the City Council considers the second reading
of the vacation ordinance at their next regularly scheduled meeting. City Council meets on the first
and third Tuesday of every month. If the ordinance is approved on second reading, it becomes official
after the tenth business day following approyal on second reading and upon filing of the ordinance
with the Garimer County Clerk and Recorder. Vacation of an easement requires approval �of a
resolution (which requires on. ly one reading) by the Planning and Zoning Board: If the Planning and �
Zoning Board approves the easement vacation, it becomes official upon recording of the iesolution
with the Larimer County Clerk and Recorder.
7.10 •
�
�
� � •.
� ����1 V � � 1 1���
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
DATE: July 17, 1997 DEPT: Storm�ater -�
PROJECT:
PLANNER:
#2-870 Spring
(LDGS) Final
L- eanne Harter
Creek Village P.U.D.
All comments must be reeeived no later_than the staff review meeting.
Wednesday; Aubust 13, 1997
1. The submitted plans do not have the level of detail required for a final submittal.
Important details, such as proposed gradin�, are not provided. Please provide utility plans
and drainage report that include all required details for a final submittal. The following
comments are offered based on the information provided. Additional comments may arise
once more information is provided.
RESPONSE:
2. Please check with the Natural Resources Dept. regardin� this submittal. There inight
be a buffer requested from Spring Creek.
3:.Please show the water quality outlet structure on the drainage plan and provide a
drawing of this structure in the details section of the plans. Provide a st��e-storage curve
for the wacer quality pond in the drainage report. �
RESPONSE:
� _ � -- .
���
• �� ' �/ � Si ture�/'� �' �lt� i�/� `�;%.
Date. `.• 'i � g�. . . � . _
_ _ _ ti .,. `;n�ri �.'.�i�Ij ilC �r' _ _ _ .
��� a�/1P i~l=1%.�:t
CBECg HERE � YOU WISH TO RECQVE COPIES OF REVISIONS ;�.� �on�; LT(OM/Y�� `
. 1,_ �%y�/��{
�J11W � SlW �j.� 1 � � ?1.�� - Q
_.: _. ,.. -
� .r, r7 � ...
_ � ✓
�Utility . �Redl�e Uftlity _ _
City of Fort Collins
� �
4. A drainage easement is needed from the City Parks Dept. for the release from the site to
Spring Creek. Please provide means for runofito pass under the bike path.
RESPONSE:
S. Please provide drainage easements for all proposed drainage facilities. Delineate these
on the plat and on the drainage plan.
RESPONSE:
6..The water quality pond must have erosion protection at the downstream end of the
outlet. The erosion protection needs to be provided away from the immediate stream
banks to minimize the disturbance to the creek: Buried rip-rap should be used where
possible.
RESPONSE:
7. Please delineate the 100-year floodplain for Spring Creek and tl�e Ganal Importation
Channel. Please also label the 100-year Base Flood Elevation. It aprears that the
floodplain may back flow into the site. Please consider this possible back flow in the site
drainage desi�n.
RESPONSE:
8. Please give flowline elevations for all cross-pans and inlets.
RESPONSE:
9. Flow to concentration point D, at the cul-de-sac of Gandoff Court does not appear to
have an outlet from the cul-de-sac or any means to be conveyed to the water quality pond.
Please show details.
RESPONSE:
10. Sub-basins 4 and 5 are not divided. Please add a sub-basin line at the sub-basin divide.
RESPONSE:
_
_ — _ _ . _.. _. __ _ __------
,� - .
� �
1 l. Please revise the street capacity calculations provided in the drainage report. For the
minor storm, calculate capacity based on no crown overtopping. Also, note that street
plan and profiles show longitudinal slopes closer to .5% than the2% used in the
calculations.
RESPONSE: �
,� Please refer to the redlined plans and report for additional review comments.
con�ns
PI�OJECT
COIVIlVIENT SHEET
I�ATE: August 4, 1997 DEPTo �Vater & Wastewater
PROJECT: #2-870 Spring Creek Village P.U,I�.
(LDGS)Final
PLANNER: Leanne Harter
All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, August 13, 1997
-Provide easements for 8" water and sanitary sewer mains in the north west portion of property.
-Will fire line or irrigation taps be needed for commercial buildings.
=Maintain 5' separation between mains and flow line of curb and gutters.
-Maintain 10' horizontal separation between water and sewer services.
-Add note that all water main to be D.I.P. encased in poly-wrap.
-Abandon existing tap in Hobbit Street and re-tap main at the entrance.
-Provide stationing for sanitary sewer services on plan and profile sheet.
-Provide separate sheets for sanitary sewer and street profiles.
-Will conflicts occur between sanitary sewer services and 30" water main in Stuart Street.
-Provide a minimum of 12" vertical separation at water and sewer main crossings.
-Show and label curbstop and meter pit location for commercial buildings.
-Coordinate landscape with civil design. Show water and sewer on landscape plan.
-Provide required landscape and utility separations on landscape plans.
-See utility and landscape plans for other comments.
r� ,
❑
�
Date: � � ; � 1 Signaturet � .
_ � _-�--," � �.%;;..i �r"`-. t .'f
,� , , �_
\
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVI.SIONS ,
X PLAT _SITE _DRAINAGE REPORT _OTHER
X UTILITY X REDLINE UTILITY X GANDSCAPE
Collins
. 11
��o���
C ����1 �1 1 � ����
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
_ __ _
DATE: July 17, 1997 DEPT: Transportation Pinge
PROJECT: #2-870 Spring Creek Village P.U.D.
(LDGS) Final
PI,ANNER: Leanne �iarter
� ,, � . �,� �c,!" ". '; ',t :
a l � • . - ; 7...:;.; � ���i �c:..S�.- ' ,,
� ��
All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, August 13, 1997 _:
� G,, .
,- ,: , ,,� ; . ,.�.. , _ � �'� : .
;,:.:, . � ,
. � . . _.
`� ��, r . � .�+ f �� , � ,^ .. « .. '-��, �t " . ., ,. � � 1 � �.. . 4 4,y
! .
.
.
� -. . ; .. . � :... ��-.
� t
� i �. . f .. . M� H . ..
� . . .:: �' �... � � ' ,.. � • ' ♦ , r .,
_ .. � _ . F � � ' � . .. ._'�;�- . x�,_ (.. . . . . .
.. � r k,. -. �., .. , .
� ,, - . .
�.
` ' t . 1 j� � 1 ^, t'., , �/ . . � . ,
� ., -��- � ' i
, ..,. ,
. ,.
� . <. �;i. . _ . ' .,.�� ,. . .. " , * ; . . . -
�'"{�r_ _. ,� ...4.. w. . .. .. "i
� . �
. ��7'-- f / " _ _ . '
' . . �e{'` �' �_
J
na�: �/
�
� '`"" � i'' . , ` '- f ..�., � � . _ . • ._ -� •
� . r' .
�, � �� :. .
�._,r1�. ,.. . d .. . .r ._
CHECg HERE � YOU W1SH TO RECEIIIE OOPIES OF REVISIONS
_ P� ,� S� — � � _ ��' - -
_U��Y _��Y _��
City of Fort Collins
,
�
,.... �i
�
�
�
C OMMEl\TT S HEET
������ l�
�! � .
f9 �r�� �� ��-�-� ���,�� 4��,� �
�,,����-� �� �� �s��- �� .�,'�
� � .
��� . �����; �-L ��_ �r.� ,���.
�'�?�..�'-►�.� `-y�c:,- �,r�.�D�7'` ��� �.�',�-rn..� ��
� � '�
�'��� ,� � � �;�`'�� ,
Current Planning
DATE: July 17, 1997 DEPT: Transfort
PROJECT: #2-870 Spring Creek Village P.U.D.
(LDGS) Fina1
PLANNER: Leanne Harter
___ _
All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, August 13, 1997 ,
,
�E��! C/'v � �l ���7 S"C f ����2C.�2'� ��/S�S /�. `�� C'l�'c�� ,
rc' -��� n�� � ��. �/..�G� o'.���� ��t
� �
/� a�- ��� �.�� d� �7-��.a-�,�a� � ���1,:�� �
�'�l`'�
PROJECT
���G� ��„7 ��fi �l ��a � .
�
Date:
_ _ __. _ . _ __
Cf�ECK HERE � YOU TO RE�EIVE OOPIES OF REVISIONS
P1� ite _ Dra�age R�rt _ O�a'
_�� —�� ��
.�y�
�:�
City of Fort Collins
.• . �
, �
� � •
C OMlo/IEl�TT S HEET
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning
_
DATE: July 17, 1997 DEP`I': Light �i Power
PROJECT:
PLANNER:
#2-870 Spring
(LDGS) Final
Leanne Harter
Creek Village P.U.D.
All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, August 13, 1997
Plans do not specify the distance between curb and walk. A minimum of 5' is requ.ired between
a curb and detached sidewalk to allow space to install electric equipment.
Trees planted between curb and sidewalk will be over electric line. Additional conduit will be
required to protect the underground electric lines. There will be additional charges to the
developer for this modification.
Please maintain a 40' distance between streetlights and shade trees. See attachment for
streetlight and street tree clearance requirements.
Date:
OOPIES OF REVISIONS
—��
_✓��
O�er
City of Forf Collins
CHECK HERE � YOU WISH TO RECEIVE
�/,Plat . ✓� .
�U� � �
��'
�;
>3�;
F': � s ,i;! ..
:��},t}%F:1�;�..:3`� .
i,� ' �
ARD T
T L�CATIDNS
OF.�...r-.,�..
SIDEWALK
PLANTING STRIP
.ELECTRIC LINE
GURB
STREET
40' MINIMUM F�R
�� R�� i �iun i