HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHILI'S PUD - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 6-87E - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSITEM NO. 5
�y;� 1 MEETING DATE 7/27/92
STAFF Steve Olt
City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
Chili's P.U.D. - Final, #6-87E
Vaught-Frye Architects
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Brinker International
6820 L.B.J. Freeway
Dallas, Texas
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for final approval of a 5,550 square foot
standard sit-down restaurant on 2.4 acres. The site is located in
the Square Shopping Center, at the northeast corner of South
College Avenue and East Horsetooth Road. The property is zoned HB,
Highway Business.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with a condition
EBECIITIVE SIIMMARY:
This request is for a 5,550 square foot sit-down restaurant on a
2.4 acre pad site in the existing Square Shopping Center. The
building will be no higher than 18', with signage and colored
awnings on three sides. Landscaping consists of street trees along
South College Avenue and East Horsetooth Road, and a mix of
deciduous and evergreen shrubs over flowers and groundcover as
foundation and accent plantings. The primary access to the site is
from the intersection of the medianed drive for the Square with
East Horsetooth Road. This will not always remain as a full service
intersection. The development agreement and utility plans have not
yet been signed, therefore a condition of approval is required.
This request earns 59% of the maximum applicable points on the
Business Service Uses Point Chart and meets the applicable All
Development Criteria in the Land Development Guidance System.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. Colle�e Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0550 (303) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTh'[ENT
�
Chili's P.U.D. - Final, #6-87E
July 27, 1992 P& Z Meeting
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background•
�
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: HB; existing commercial (The Square)
S: HB; vacant undeveloped ground
E: HB; existing commercial and office (The Square)
W: HB; existing commercial and retail (various users)
This property was annexed into the City with the Strachan Second
Annexation in August, 1971.
The property was part of the Strachan Subdivision, First Filing
that was approved in May, 1972, and replatted with approval of the
Strachan Subdivision, Second Filing in October, 1977.
The Foothills Square Master Plan was originally approved in 1977,
with amendments to the plan occurring in 1980, 1981, 1982, and
1987.
Hardee's 4,500 square foot sit-down, drive-thru, and outdoor
seating fast food restaurant was approved on this pad site in
March, 1987; however, that plan has expired.
2. Land Use•
This is a request for final approval of a 5,550 square foot
standard sit-down restaurant on a 2.4 acre pad site in the Square
Shopping Center. This request was evaluated against the Business
Service Uses Point Chart in the Land Development Guidance System
and earns 32 of 54 maximum applicable points, equalling 59%. It
earned points for a) contiguity to an existing transit route, b)
part of a community/regional shopping center, c) two acres or
more, d) joint parking, and e) contiguity to existing urban
development.
3. Design:
Architecture:
The building facade is predominantly red brick with significant
banks of windows on the front and two sides of the building. These
elevations incorporate multi-colored cloth awnings over the main
entry and windows. The maximum building height is 18'. All
mechanical equipment will be either enclosed within the building or
adequately screened.
�
�.
Chili's P.U.D. - Final, #6-87E
July 27, 1992 P& Z Meeting
Page 3
Landscapinq:
i
The landscaping consists of shade trees along the street frontages
and adjacent to the interior parking areas, and a mix of ornamental
and evergreen trees between the perimeter sidewalk and building.
Evergreen trees are being used to screen the service area and the
ground-mounted electric services. A variety of evergreen and
flowering shrubs, perennial flowers and groundcovers are being used
as foundation and accent plantings around the building and monument
sign.
Parkinq:
The 1.7 acre parcel that Chili's is purchasing contains 84 of the
635 total parking spaces presently available in the Square. The
parking guideline recommendation for a standard sit-down restaurant
is 10 patron spaces per 1,000 square feet of building. With this
use, 55 patron spaces are needed. City Code requires 2 parking
spaces for every 3 employees working during the major shift. The
available parking is considered to be sufficient for this request.
An overall parking analysis for the entire Square is included on
the Site Plan.
siqnaqe:
Signage is being proposed on three faces of the building, being the
west (front), north, and south elevations. These wall signs will be
individual illuminated letters backed by painted metal siding. A
freestanding sign will be located at the southwest corner of the
site, diagonal to the property lines and building. This sign will
be 10' in height and contain 50 square feet per face (two-sided).
The applicant is maintaining the option to add 50 square feet of
wall signage to the east elevation in the future. The entire sign
package, with the future signage, will comply with the City's sign
ordinance.
4. Neighborhood Compatibility:
A neighborhood meeting was not held for this request because the
proposed use is in conformance with the intent of the Overall
Development Plan for the Square and the approved use on this pad
site in 1987. This use is considered to be compatible with the
surrounding uses along South College Avenue.
5. Transportation:
A traffic impact analysis was submitted to the City and reviewed by
the Transportation Department. This study supports Transportation's
position that the intersection of the entry to the Square with East
�
Chili's P.U.D. - Final, #6-87E
July 27, 1992 P& Z Meeting
Page 4
•
Horsetooth Road will not continue to be a full service intersection
as traffic in this area increases. Future development and
construction of the approved Mitchell Drive to the south will
change the operation of the South College Avenue - East Horsetooth
Road intersection. At some point in time in the near future, left-
in and left-out turns to and from the Square, from East Horsetooth
Road, will not be allowed.
6. Engineering:
The development agreement and utility plans for this request have
not yet been signed; therefore, a condition of approval is
necessary stating that The Planninq and Zoning Board approves this
planned unit development final plan upon the condition that the
development agreement, final utility plans, and final P.II.D. plans
for the planned unit development be negotiated between the
developer and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the
second monthly meetinq (September 28, 1992) of the Planninq and
Zoninq Board following the meetinq at which this planned unit
development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so
esecuted, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting,
apply to the Board for an extension of time. The Board shall not
qrant any such extension of time unless it shall first find that
there exists with respect to said planned unit development final
plan certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which
require the qrantinq of the extension in order to prevent
exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner of developer of such
property and provided that such extension can be granted without
substantial detriment to the public qood.
If the staff and the developer disaqree over the provisions to be
included in the development aqreement, the developer may present
such dispute to the Board for resolution if such presentation is
made at the next succeedinq or second succeedinq monthly meetinq of
the BoarB. The Board may table any such decision, until both the
staff and the developer have had reasonable time to present
sufficient information to the Board to enable it to make its
decision. (If the Board elects to table the decision, it shall also
extend the term of this condition until the date such decision is
made.)
If this condition is not met within the time established herein (or
as extended, as applicable), then the final approval of this
planned unit development shall become null and void and of no
effect. The date of final approval for this planned unit
development shall be deemed to be the date that the condition is
met, for purposes of determininq the vestinq of rights. For
purposes of calculatinq the runninq of time for the filinq of an
appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II, Division 3, of the City
•
Chili's P.U.D. - Final, #6-87E
July 27, 1992 P& Z Meeting
Page 5
•
Code, the ��final decision�� of the Board shall be deemed to have
been made at the time of this conditional approval; however, in the
event that a dispute is presented to the Board for resolution
reqardinq provisions to be included in the development agreement,
the running of time for the filinq of an appeal of such ��final
decision�� shall be counted from the date of the Board�s decision
resolvinq such dispute.
RECOMMENDATION:
This request earns 59� of the applicable criteria on the Business
Service Uses Point Chart and meets the Al1 Development Criteria in
the Land Development Guidance System. Therefore, staff recommends
approval of Chili's P.U.D. - Final, #6-87E with one condition:
1. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit
development final plan upon the condition that the
development agreement, final utility plans, and final
P.U.D. plans for the planned unit development be
negotiated between the developer and City staff and
executed by the developer prior to the second monthly
meeting (September 28, 1992) of the Planning and Zoning
Board following the meeting at which this planned unit
development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if
not so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent
monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of
time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of
time unless it shall first find that there exists with
respect to said planned unit development final plan
certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances
which require the granting of the extension in order to
prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner of
developer of such property and provided that such
extension can be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good.
If the staff and the developer disagree over the
provisions to be included in the development agreement,
the developer may present such dispute to the Board for
resolution if such presentation is made at the next
succeeding or second succeeding monthly meeting of the
Board. The Board may table any such decision, until both
the staff and the developer have had reasonable time to
present sufficient information to the Board to enable it
to make its decision. (If the Board elects to table the
decision, it shall also extend the term of this condition
until the date such decision is made.)
i
Chili's P.U.D. - Final, #6-87E
July 27, 1992 P& Z Meeting
Page 6
•
If this condition is not met within the time established
herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final
approval of this planned unit development shall become
null and void and of no effect. The date of final
approval for this planned unit development shall be
deemed to be the date that the condition is met, for
purposes of determining the vesting of rights. For
purposes of calculating the running of time for the
filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II,
Division 3, of the City Code, the "final decision" of the
Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of
this conditional approval; however, in the event that a
dispute is presented to the Board for resolution
regarding provisions to be included in the development
agreement, the running of time for the filing of an
appeal of such "final decision" shall be counted from the
date of the Board's decision resolving such dispute.
HORSETOOTH ROAD
�
PUNNINO AND ZONINO
BOARD APPROVAL OWNER'S CER7IFICA710N �
OWNER'3 SIONATURE yT
' _ .,�o'�,.
-1 �.
-'_ L.- _ _ " .____.._...___
F.
�
�
TYPICAL BULDNO ELEVATIONS
..w.—�-- � � ��i 1��[ �� � �.,.Ee....a
� I! I� ��I I I1�' � i �
.. ..���,,.�.u. .t........,—, I .... _ _ _ �4.
� ..<. � �. €°�bl�l�i ,� �i- ���' ili,
s I1
f { �—�u_
, i- d- d A-i d� ...�o,�..m.e..
_ _/I .�,.-,�iL', �[L�p- d .._,_. -
�� �i;� + _ '
OENERAL NOTES
LAND U8E BREAKDOWN
PARKING ANALYSIS
...,.,�...,, ..;�;� '° vnucx�•
FRYE
.�w� o.a.......,� .. �, �s�
CHILI'S P.U.D. �„«;,A ,�,.�
6RILl 6 BAR � °LAN
fonr couHa co�duoo
,�
�
W I
>
<
��
J
0
U
F w, �
�
O �
N
�
.': _ . . i . . _ . . �
s
' , ' I �` r� �� i
-�.;,I_\II _ i i��� . ��
��, T ,, I
�!�-I- - � � ° �h ' ~-
i I����� I I� I 6 I
_ _.. . � �.J ,
I_ I � �
� j �
��
•
VICINI7v MAP
THE SOUARE SHOPPING CENTER P L AN T NO TE S
I �
�Z
rW c^
�� Qo
� �
W (J}i-
J rr
O
(!UB
" �.ney
� s �
�
O
I�1=;���_ I I I I I I'' ��1��6-,,�
`(tlu �fi)u
H 0 R 5 E T 0 0 T H R 0 A D
t.0 o�a� ou e «o.ao��..�u e�H
.oe=in�aim�. �o�ru„mee.�a�a c.ee..
2, eu w�r a n,u 0 r�Igal�E .im o �u�
popr�p Irrlqatio��• �ire�a anE v�r�E OeE� e�all
La IrriquteE wit� e Erip �yatem
S •11 t.een to br Eailea ! OurlaOGaU.
4. •11 . cePt t e Dlan
to b< riulcFeE �It� pole peellnq�n3tea rv9e a
AI1 atM1er a EaEs [ e m11c�eC wltM1 B-B IncM1 cob0le
on �e�C Eorr�er fobrlc� �
6 EEpinq E n qra�a o U� anall E� t�qo �
� .i..i ..i��. e� .iin iov�or .oe.�
— e. Inq 1 •lo .111 6• min�num
ai Iqnt (Bj incn�� os ten (10j�last olavlEtn.
� 7. feaa oreanase ar eeant a oitM1 au'eacue natructlan o�
a ���;:a P . e,.��.o,a a ,�a �
.,�� . ,.�a s�o�� �o�_.a,�..� �
Mi�atprnaa-Crea[eE Nh atqraaa. Cr1iry�E etro�, ot 3,0
lIb�./ocre, ta Ee aDG�la! m�lc� lo tM1� �.-,e.aea o
. . �— a.aa. tr.. o.�m; �.i �. on�om.a , m i�. ci�,
.' ' ro...�.r e.�ors a r tr... o �otea o .
I c�e„ a.. oia�isa.�o���.e o. ..�..a o� m. c� u�
.f9ntro(-�aY-
• �..� � � 1D. �001tlonatruct(e't�ar��rub �e��• ana^co^9 rcniYecl
I ep�cifica[lona. anE o 'lontin9 Inatollatlon
� ��,o,��,o� �„ e. p.o.�a.a e, ��. � a, P. �
i prior to
;1 ... i^ Yluor c 0 esall`Qua er an�PianlYl'cal�la�n�a mo
C Inqnc n aE e
F o�e'iie�.. ��icy o e a�e�iir��
,i.�� .�in�evP�o.sa rw cm�..
• Y2. nu io�a.�oc��a m,.t c. m.im�.a o
, � i., ee�i. ..rer , o.
j ��i r ��zsi�o ai�auo�
�— _— _ — — _ _ �i.��a�.�c�io, io i..�aeo�or� e a.uri�oi.�er
ir o�o�n=��r.
l— 19. u� �a�a.�ov..n� e iam.e nr me o.,�e�.
I IncluEln9 Viontln9� In lFe r, -of-�aY.
PLANT LIST
, o�a� �mmo� �a �<a�;� �om. s..
DEGWOUS SWDE iREESmc
Ms ,z S�kyf�M��iNo :r�ecuai ciwM:oaMarnnNo. 'sxrtine' Y c�i:
MF GPEi� wpan�� e nemer �
In� Pmu� c a�Ees Muf� 6 11 nt
OFN4IEMI�L iFtEES
CSS ] Spinq Smr CraUappN • ep. 'Sprin9 Sno� 1�%�' Cai.
F Ra6an1 CraDoppb Nu�ue ep. 'POOwnt'
SHRUBS
JB 3� Bu�lcle JunID�� ��aGina 'BWlalo' S-Gal
JH 6� Mu9M1e� JuniDer J. �orixon[alis 'Nu9��s' S-Gal
DNL t2 6�ar1 N n c Sunny iryari ��I
SB�b !6 Blue Y•op l a�t�na CWntilla te�cm�^GOW Drop'
ist Spire ryeplene � can annv 5-Cai
0.EFENNWS R CRWNOCPv£RS
5 al Scivia Sah+a ap. t-Gol
Fg 51ue fee e Cfee �O enbe G
5 4 Nock 54arberry� Ou ennea I dlco Um �-CoI
CHILI'S
BAR & GRILL
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO
PRELIMINARY/FINAL
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
�
SCALE: 1'=30'-0"
VAUGHT
FRYE
����
a.�h�te�,=
111� St w
t 90535
C(30J) 1iE �i�i9t
WR --
JOB N0.
OW1WN
CHECKEO �
flM5E0 �-9�
�r ����
. .s .���)f.+r�JY��Gux/ik
F�or�- ���vr� � �or� c� ass �
i
�, '�1 _
Y Y
.�� -�. � , `�
IIII , �j .
IIII � '_;.���
II 11 - - .
IIY ..i=
_�F i cLEVA � ION - CLASS •
-
— — _ _ --..
_ - -- --_'
-- - —
=- -- - ------1— - --
�� � ,� . _ � _- -�"� - -
� �
' � 'FY" } � _ �_ , „. �, � _ �- � , � ��_
k � y r � f (� !
NB � k�i" .-�_ ��``��� � �Y � N J i !; y i7.�. - __ -
�" ' n N e �f �� �� �i����ir��r��_ � �r�iiri �i� � ��d��� � "�° � : ; � -- � ;T� � t � ` -' `� y : _;
� �
j i � d �� �� �; .r; ��t�i�� r `; •1,�„�: ;: ; ■ ; , ' �' �- , �,� ,, ��p;�
�, e��n ������` :�������r� _ , �� � - - - - : '
��flY Y� ��� � f r._ T-y ;, �, y. _�_ . � �- � �!�ti ���i � �. �1,�"Ir�,�41�
. . y
_ ,�d� _ ,.� yI
�
� • �'- - �. ��. ��":i r •. �,- � :..,�:����F..7�Z.W�:� �:.:�. i.��(� ij:�.4:...��... �,�k�� i`.,;".. ` , � , .�,.r_----a�-� -��i:��—�.u—�=7__�:�._.r
F!.�. . . . . _ ,._-i �,__ . . �� _.
'�i'vHT FLEVA�illi�a � ��LASS %
_
— --- - - -
-___._ -=- �'�:-_-- :,� .—_:_ �----r-�
—_.- -- - — — ----�
�4"--: : --- - -: - �--- .. _ ... _ _ . _
, --- -- - ---- ---=� _ "-
I�rI
;� � ;ti�, F��'►
�`,�
�
r�
.��'� ��J
�: •
�Ep,b' =LC�/{i Il�(�� ��L!',;�:: �
�
PLANNING OBJECTNES - CHILJ'S P.U.D.
•
Chili's P.U.D. is located on an undeveloped pad in the Foothills Square, P.U.D., on the
northeast corner of College Ave. and Horsetooth Road. At this location, the restaurant
will be highly visible from both College and Horsetooth, as well as being easily
accessible from the Foothills Square retail shopping center and The Foothills Fashion
Mall.
Primary vehicular access will be through an existing entrance off of Horsetooth Road
just to the east of the pad, or from College Avenue to East Monroe, an existing
entrance on the north side of the Square. Chili's is provided with 86 parking spaces,
including three handicapped. Pedestrian access is obtained through existing sidewalks
on both College and Horsetooth, with a main connection on the west side of the
building. There are several sidewalks located on the perimeter of the site leading to the
building, all handicapped accessible. There will also be a painted crosswalk from the
main retail building to the pad. Supply loading/unloading to the restaurant will be on
the northeast side of the building away from College Ave. A 10' wide loading zone for
trucks, and a 5' high screened fence will be provided for the service yard area.
The restaurant is approximately 18' high, with a flat roof and parapet to conceal roof top
equipment. Walls will be a red brick with light beige accents with dark green and red
striped canopys over the windows. The Chilis logo is painted on the north and south
sides of the building serving as signs, as well as a sign above the front entry. There
will also be a ground mounted sign at a 45° angle, located southwest of the building.
The building is generously set back from the streets, with well landscaped buffers,
utilizing shade and ornamental trees, shrubs and groundcover, integrating a design
similar to that which exists at the Square.
�� ACTIUITY � Bus i ness Se ry ice Uses
DEFIN�ION�
Those activities which are predominantly retail, office, and service uses
which would not qualify as or be a part of a neighborhood or commu-
nity/regional shopping center. Uses include: retail shops; offices; per-
sonal service shops; financial institutions; hotels/motels; medical clin-
ics; health clubs; membership clubs; standard and fast-food restaurants;
hospitals; mortuaries; indoor theatres; retail laundry and dry cleaning
outlets; limited indoor recreation �uses; small animal veterinary clinics;
printing and newspaper offices; and, other uses which are of the same gen-
eral character.
C�TEI <IA' Each of the fol 1 owi ng appl i cabl e cri teri a must be
answered "yes" and implemented within the develop-
ment plan.
Yes No
1. Does the project gain its primary
vehicular access from a street other
than South College Avenue?
2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN AT LEAST 50%
OF THE MAXIMUM POINTS AS CALCULATED
ON "POINT CHART E" FOR THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA?
1i� �
, �I
a. Is the activity contiguous to an existing transit route (not appli-
cable for uses of less than 25,000 square feet GLA or with less
than 25 employees) or located in the Central Business District?
b. Is the project located outside of the "South College Avenue Corri-
dor?"
c. Is the project contiguous to and functionally a part of a neighbor-
hood or community/regional shopping center, an office or industrial
park, located in the Central Business District or in the case of a
single user, employ or will employ a total of more than 100 full-
time er�ployees d�ring a single 8-hour shift?
d. Is the project on at least two acres of land or located in the Cen-
tral Business District?
��fini i�
".�� �, �, ��� �„
—22— `
�
� �
�.
�
�
continued
e. Does the project contain two or more significant uses (such as
retail, office, residential, hotel/motel, and recreation)?
f. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on-site
parking areas and adjacent existing or future off-site parking
areas which contain more than ten (10) spaces?
g• Ooes the activity reduce non-renewable energy usage through the -
application of alternative energy systems or through energy
conservation measures beyond those normally required by the Model
Energy Code as adopted by the City? Refer to Appendix G for Energy
Lonservation Methods to use for calculating energy conservation
points.
h. Is the project located with at least 1/6th of its property boundary
contiguous to existing urban development?
i. If the site contains a building or place in which a historic event
occurred, which has special public value because of notable archi-
tecture, or is of cultural significance, does the project fulfill
the following criteria.
i. Prevent creation of influences adverse to its preservation;
�
r�
f
��
�
�
:�
:'�
`.]
:�
_�
_',
�
�
=�
�
�
�
ii. Assure that new structures and uses will be in keeping
with the character of the building or place. Imitation of
period styles should be avoided; and
iii. Propose adaptive use of the building or place that will
lead to its continuance, conservation and improvement in an
aopropriate manner while respecting the integrity of the
neighborhood.
-23-
� •
��c�� � . u. �.
BUSINESS
SERVICE USES P�INT CHART E
For All Criteria Applicable Criteria Only
- � -- I II - III Iv
Criterlon CirGe Multtpller Po�nts Mcx�mum
Criterion �+kab�e
me "eamea AooilcaCls
� � Ccrrecr Score Pc�rrs
Ixll
a. Transit Route X w 2 0 2 �(. �...
b. South College Corridor X X 2 0 4 � 8
c. Part of Center X X 2 0 3 (� 6
d. Two Acres or More X X 2 0 3 �, 6
e, Mixed-Use X X 2. 0 3� � 6
f. Joint Parking � 1 2 0 3 (o (�
g, Energy Conservation X 1 2 3 4 0 2 � 8
h. Contiguity X X 2 0 5 � d 10
i. Historic Preservation 1 2 0 2 .— —.
j. 1 2 0
k. 1 2 0
�� 1 2 0
Totals �j 2 Gj�
v vi
Percentage Earned of Maximum Appiicabie Points V/VI = VII �G� %
vii