HomeMy WebLinkAboutDUECK COLORADO PROPERTIES - REZONING - 9-87B - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPlanning & Zoning F3o� rlinutes .
�1ay 18 , 1987
page 19
\
Member Brown stated one of the purposes of the separation distance is to
avoid over concentration of group hanes and the distance should be kept
the same f_or all zones.
ri�nber Daw commented the one-third mile is reasonable and 750 feet is not
adaquate. He stated Section 4 the barrier requirement could be addressed
by inserting the word substantial before natural. The intent of public
park is generic and it should be eliminated or stated as corimunity park.
S�ction 5, part B, changes should be considered regarding "the critPria is
limited to the following" cnanging this phrase to "the criteria should
include the following". Section b, part C, suggestions to eliminate
accepting the developmentally disabled and all should be treated the same.
Also, the aaner-occupied or non-profit issue should be reviewed.
Member Strom commented on Section 4, part B, that the beginning is pennis-
sive. Public parks and major thorough fares should not be eliminated.
Member Brown indicated the State is tending toward a trend of 4 residents
as to 3.
Chainnan Crews stated that in the long n.in group homes will be easier to
put into neighborhoods.
Dick Suinn asked since there has been recommendations to the ordinance
proposal would the new ordinance proposal be brought back next month to be
shared. Chairman Crews indicated it would.
No motion was made. The Board asked staff to work further on the proposed
ordinance.
DUECK REZONING - #9-87B
Ken ti�]aido gave the staff report reco�nending rezoning frcan T to HB with two
conditions: 1.) a PUD be requir�d, and 2.) the entire parcel be master
planned.
Member Brown asked if there were uses by riglzt on the property. Mr. Wa.ido
indicated there were none.
David Moore, the applicant, indicated they were in favor of the t� zoning
with the PUD condition because it would make marketing easier. HE stated
they plan to provide quality shopping for the approximately 1200 families
who will live in the area. He indicated Jim Giffod, the land planner,
would be able to answer questions.
Member Edwards asked what the intent is oF the supennarket.
David Moore stated the intent was to get a quality supermarket into the
� location because a 7-11 or PDQ would not be adaquate and they needed the
additional draw to support the larger facility. He commented that College
Plannir�g & Zoning � Minutes •
tiiay 18, 1987
page 20
�
Avenue would contribute to this draw.
Chairman Crews indicated that the issue of a supermarket would be deatt
with further down the road.
Member Brown inquired if false levels of expectation are being set.
Mr. Moore stated he had a good track record and has good relationships with
major food companies. �
Member O'Dell inf.onned it has been the policy of the City Fort Collins to
locate supermarkets in neighborhood shopping centers. Her concern was that
the location being discussed would not be in a neighborhood shoppinq cPnter
but on College Avenue.
Mr. Moore restated there would be approximately 1200 families living w?thin
a mile of the supermarket. Del Webb will have approximately 3000
families to the west.
Mesnber O'Dell motioned to approve the Dueck Rezoning project with the con-
dition requiring the entire 20.1 acres be master planned as a sir�gle unit
at the time of any development proposals. Member Lang seconded. The
motiqn carried 7-0.
� Member Kern commented he felt uncomf.ortable about a shopping center in a
mixed cor�ar►unity, but he was more at ease with the PUD condition.
Mr. Peterson reminded the Board of the Joint P&Z/City Council meeting on
May 26, 1987 at 6:15p.m. concerning the Foothills �Iall project. Members
Brown and Crews responded they would attend.
Meeting was ajourned at 11:42p.m.
�