HomeMy WebLinkAboutAMENDMENT TO PONDEROSA PARK PUD - PRELIMINARY - 17-87 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSITEM NO-8
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING OF May 18, 1%7
STAFF DEPORT
PROJECT: Amendment to Ponderosa Park PUD - Preliminary - #17-87
APPLICANT: John D. Martin OWNER: Same
1500 Laporte Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80521
PROJECT PLANNER: Debbie deBesche
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for preliminary approval of_20 single family
detached patio homes on 3.69 acres, located on Ponderosa Drive, 250 feet
south of West Mulberry Street, zoned R-L, Low Density Residential.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting preliminary approval of 20
single family detached patio homes on 3.69 acres, resulting in a density of
5.42 units per acre. The site was previously approved for 24 lots as part
of the Ponderosa Park PUD (June 5, 1979). The curb cut and roadway are
existing which the applicant has incorporated into the proposed project.
The project achieves more than adequate percentage points on the "Residen-
tial Uses" point chart and meets the criteria of the All Development Crite-
ria Chart.
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT 300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303) 221-6750
SERVICES, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Amendment to Ponderosaark PUD - Preliminary - #17-8
May 18, 1987 P&Z Meeting - Page 2
COMMENTS
1. Background:
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: RL; Resident/Attorney Office
S: RL; duplex (Ponderosa Park PUD)
E: RL; Mobile homes (Skyline Mobile Home Park PUD)
W: RL; Single family dwellings (Green Meadows Subdivision)
The site was previously planned and approved as part of the Ponderosa Park
PUD which was approved by City Council on June 5, 1979. The approval was
for 46 townhome units (duplexes and four-plexes) on 7.6 acres. Approxi-
mately half of the units were built. The present proposal is for 20 single
family detached patio homes on 3.69 acres.
2. Land Use:
The proposal is consistent with surrounding land uses of duplexes and four-
plexes and the nearby mobile home park.
The project is supported by the Land Use Policies Plan and achieves more
than adequate percentage points on the Residential Uses point chart.
3. Neighborhood Compatibility:
A neighborhood meeting was held on March 2, 1987, and the main concern was
for the potential for attracting low income housing. The applicant proposes
patio homes retailing in the low 50's. Staff's opinion is that, with the
landscaping and submitted elevation plans, the project is compatible with
the neighborhood in terms of land use, scale, and density. A copy of the
neighborhood meeting summary is included in this Staff Report.
4. Design:
The applicant has worked around the existing driveway and has basically
kept the same layout of lots as previously approved.
The landscape plan includes one street tree per lot which will be provided
by the developer.
The driveway (Ponderosa Court) will be dedicated and maintained by the City
with the exception of the interior parking island. The island will be main-
tained by the Homeowners Association.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed use is compatible with surrounding uses and meets the criteria
of the Land Development Guidance System. Therefore, staff recommends
approval of the Amendment to Ponderosa Park PUD Preliminary.
I-'
4
�'c�
r rrl
/
y nYl
DUIbvIUL Bur ELOFE—I
=
—
r
Sra, v[nB-04 3r A,G. IYXt.
cuRD,outibt}WA D Asb
�Yi
"�
� `�
r
PAV�M�Nt yEcTIoN
---—---�4s
III
SB!'3690"4�
�,
Ib4.0o
NIO xAI.e
if
1 - s•
`
i
I
I ID1�
I 1 �
-DGIN �JilLit(K+9i-
\
-- —L[R - BYiDT [[�oATIWI LINE
n•'DR .,Is
B,
I
I ♦�
I
�
\
13 yc
• Sr
9 E ioe -
9ai+. .utb[ v,Rvwc 9/q"
•tlV-LE
y
I -
4'
�W �.B,r drDR st vwE D/q
1 I--C� — `\w—? _� I I �I I _ �pE1ENiwV PONp r•s uew SBwt[ �evlcE .p
`P 4 1 (3 �✓= =a 2 `' b ALi\IY OPEN Sy LD w tiErl WAS- -AN
-,TAL AEEA B. L!94 AL.i
a�-- tJ��•D a5 '* ^ I - — — — E/IS'ING ZONING [ V
Nu of WIT, 10
RiN..Do Lf CEPo\oBRLZP 1 -fS _"'- __ '+i ��, •� -��' 9= W� ID `� f
J
_
Ica
11
'z
-_
i
I l Yl
a_eeB•94'uxl0o.o0'—
". i' LAueEL hIRBET
I
11 I
I' II
I
d
� a
I
i
I
IEW'AA'
D
N
f
•1.
4
A
i5a
�y
fi ldlfs.y
'� 11
•!
Bt/
N�W Ixb ►NY6.9??
N6�ub�iY
ry
9• II n '1 i
-� _J L-
�--� p[YNA6B ¢ yilUtY EF4bnENf - `
TRA6T '6,*
pE1 Et7T�O F1 POND } ALi1VE�OPEAI SPADE
n.3wlxe <upllsst6x cpttlptutta
�Pio ,m o� inasn• ro xf Rwre pf u• uer or ppa emupp,
° YY of 19_
sacaee,n or DI•YIp9 .pe Iwla9 IW.e
V16INITY MAP
L-a.Au-. I••1000� n
�ii`�_ DATA _
'OPAL btpfO m. 99
D- L EDRA DNIfS
PARKING ,PALES '[ALT A I. (I
101AL PARKNG 41
I4 I LAR GA [AGE
',NPKA.0 DRBAKpoDIN
Du14D'Nb e:OVEQAbE
LL, 150 5F
16
MOW*, I PAWNtp
DEDILd`Ep t'[E6T
Lt, 4oC aF,u
9.
LPNDDLd vE ARtA
5 oAb DF
)!Y
AGirvE uDEN ,PALE
3D1%DO Sf
Lu. Y.
IlL,B609u
1p0Y
6EGA nE ,6RIP'IUo
0
I.Of1 Lai TNCu iG, AHp 190 NoR7N vsTCA-t E tIALTs .P (9, F } L
d
i
Aa. IN PONDERa SA PAEK, P.0 p. rw C.-WS 6-0,pA�pe,
Y
a6NLps str+utuRs
.p
M urgers+9 M, Celnq tM IaNul wrcas of tM prppeatr Yce+DeE m
oO(
te�plan, e' Mve6Y cenlfY tMt [E ccupt Ne cmeitlena ane
mtrtrt+ s ut prU w s•te site plan.•Y
C
nrxiGAbr NOLpbR
s+�
f1W INTIiWIff SANK OF PMT Lott Ms, N.A
¢
w[m �IeN6p
¢
O
0
2
as
r
.ttpust uout—
Q
19 s is tplceaat laM
z
�
title to tM prapertY azZe [�I� aN es Up-
Its tNe ours ne Drpp+etoes errrtcoN sal!
�
2
edl�•5 of pwertY as
eaa .we n 0.R.9. 19]) 31-[I-111, art a s6pue Aerepn, as pr pr+a
�
¢
ti
IttorYy .M• Np.
a ...
L396
.....
at
Gu4 t• OUE
m
W it -IL
—y'' 6XM� ,GgnW
GIN SiV, VM MPf 3 A.G. PYMI'
6um,G@tt@L' WICK
Pav�M�NT 5E�71ou
I» sw�r
SITE DATA
AC 3L9 Acwcs __
At or Ac On J< O 6_Acc
Nc. P T • i' 24 _ _
Ne@en z S- @@eop.„ U¢n 5-L Bcemo„s Uym 4S @ee¢e...=
MIRK MAP
A U PLAT OF
A PART OF PONDER05A PARK P.U.P.
-iITUATF- IN TNT NOUMOT I/4 OF !!VMON I/,,TOWHIMP 1 NORTH, KANbb 6,1 wl OF -W GTM PM., FOKIbOW0,, L0111H COUNTY, WIZAP0
'PA.. IF BARING
N 09'.d'fn"u 141L Oo' N?a.
-NORTH LINO NO I/4 a-CfI -1-Al ,. �NO[TXtAN LORNGR
FND
FRI IN Ib 1-i9
. OO'sFi oO'O UI%ODNif IWN RN
4TAi6MRT OF OWNI -SHIP, yU6PIVI-110N AND MVIAATION:
<. 89'fb M't 16L.ap'
-
KNOW ALL M6N BY TH"t F¢PiitMa INAf TNf UNIA6R6IANtV, BOINt TH0 PWWO,91 AMP PRLPKIETOR•i Of 1N0 fIll-Wb Ppaa,otp LAMP, fO'WIT
Lp1A 2f TNROupH 4b AND TNp NO[TX { OF TRACT 'O' AMP ALL Of 11,11 F,G,'N 111'1 , FOND6K09A PARK PUP LNY OF fart LOLLING, COUNTY
NIUVIPO,
f a LMY tPYPMH c
��, B,6A9
of LARIMER, 4IATO OF D61NG NO[e PARTILULAEly OpryLKIBOD A% fpLL04X5. OEmINNIWG AT THE NOR1NW ttf LORYER Of TAID L'AT 46 "1) RUN IWIt
/$11"9O't 100. Hpf1lMOM1d `.*1.'p IIf AA Fppt, iNtNet 46Y`W'.*0 Ibd PO FAff, fffo a00'pp'AP't 491.98 feOT, INOMCt 4891'fb'AO"WLI&91 Pd6T,
LO rP
iNeW.E NOo ti'eo'W I4{.sofHFi1N0NGd •!89'fi'oo' W OO OO Hpf 10A POINT RI TNd dAN LI6N1-Of-WAY LINO OF PONDE¢OYA DRIVBj -f 6N A ALONG dAo
R16Nf- OF- WAY IIMp N
N 09'f4 f0 W Ids 00' •
00'0O'� W ae4.04 FEdf io 14O POINT Cf PP61W NIN61 IANTAINiWG tA1 B8 zLCOf, MDR- OR Loaf RAVO LAU40D I"
AMt TO BB URVOYOD AND SUBPIVIPPP INTO LOft. AND A eTROif Al, dHOWM ON TOW PLA1 TO OO KNOWW Al, TNp R�PLA7 01 A PART
of
_
POKVe1051 PARK P.UD AUP la UBJOCf 10 ALL OA46MENTa AMD RIGNfs-OF-WAY NOW ON RO[ARD or tN14.11140 OK INDICATOP
°
ON IN PLAT AND DPfO HOKOBY PODI"f* AMP IOMVOY 1O AHD fOR PUBLIC 0" t��FoVoVOK 4O¢6AF1tK, 1Ht &TZOOT9 AND 1,AStHONia
Ah p¢c LAID cUt AN0 Otbi6NMfBb ON TNVi PLAT,
`0 0
'=61'fA 9G O Idd.OoJ
PCWIIAP HOWOVeR IWAi ALLPPTANLB pY TNt UfY OF TNIa I ICATIPN Of tA94AMONT
POEa NOT IM POOP UPON THE CITY A WTY TO MAINIAIM 1146 OA6 KtNf> Oro POPILATPP.
aBt95f0'p IAd.PP'
v _ 1II Af -�_ 1 4A>a- 4r As-=
. ---- __ — / 6c.1e'
'xL
Wr(N65Y AUK NAWVa AND COAL6 1HIH —PAY of_A .D.,190
o �(P41unm01
$` O G.14fR o { FINtt —1;
1
$
8-_ -
V
d I TUATnn
1140' c
Yj
.Y$ 11
C MARTINN69ddf iLOI•it Q tARTN
MOT IMIR,TAIP BANK OF FORT G06t WI , N.A.
NNfAe' 4O ro' 40m'0 IGro
�itlTMfY , 4.—!40
�p9'9eW NOdn'r� Ne1'ffs I..
it S.L4B fF ®I o
aTA1d OF LOLOKAPO-A� of
LOuufY OF LARIMO¢s
w 8 +N 01'f%A 101t'
1Np FORO&OING IMFiKUMONT WAh ALKNOWLIV&OP tPfORP Mt 1NI _PAY Of A.9 119 , 8Y JOHM D MARTIN AND tL01� I
K
2 f 1 fr
MARTN AND BY
®. w O I�
41Lp.1
O p
_
Q �•€ { a.-,v W•161t'
w?
`s
MY NOTARIAL LOMMItaION GRPIRGa WOIACY PUBLIC
of
Z m - . a aa•=' NeYfd'0 969T'
r
u 1.afer4p'u•g4
ATiOQNG'Y'h bbKIIFIOAIE =
`,.
- .BI Nrurcr Aant
eT.9A N' t3J o°t > -
0 o
r ramie
tt tm .,ham r sr 1.
16 x A 8 II
Y,I 0�-- B
THIN Ib 10 LOKIIFY THA7 ON 7HB DAY Of A P 11e I OYAMINtO THO 1" TD 1NE PKOPOKTY Al, P"&CIOVI
NOROOM AND taTABLiGHtP THAI TNt OWNPR9 ANP PROPRIt7oRb OF ¢f'Lp¢P OF FIC."RfY
„�w 1 IT $ e°'v $ C +F 0
a �f et'96'N 181,' w
s_ SY W
BAIP Aa LOMhTRUIP IN L.¢4 1913,
f1-20.111, AU Ary siNOWW HBREON Ph OF SAID PAT►.
_ o 8
tg_
•��3v d-4Mr1 r8
°_• Y
•N61-ff'0 9e 11
`t�
$ Y
_
I>1• f4�4 srsr Ie
ATTDCNpY
KO61h1KATICN N'-
40 ['=00
I s 4000' {tAp' 4W J69 Ad'W IA Do' f695BW 1691' Y
ae9•ee'Abw lwoo' g-_9000 4°°D• 4e .6111,
9UKVF.YOK'Ai WfIfIbATP:
aaAlt lNful
Ib 1y O
D d9 00 100 If0
'• 8
o
* 'u $
], KILHARD A. KU1 NORfORP, A DULY KO&IGTBKBP PROFba IOWAL ONNN&AE AND LAMP IEVOPC09 IN IMP 41ATd Of LOLDRA70
W NOROBY LORilFY 1NAT THI'� PLAT Of -iH► 96PLAi OF A PART OF PONDtRoaA PARK YU.P. , 1¢BLY AMP LB¢Rttiw
PATE AFRIL 90,1101
t
.e S40P4r 50� a_re ��
ROPRH. WL TNt RPOLLV�ii G A � U¢VOY MAPO OY MG OR UWOOK MY PIRicT SUPt¢Y1410N. .
I 3 4A 4o.Oo' 4— It
o
Ne�•f9 ta'i Ise OO' y
TKAU b
z
KILNAEPA KUI P
PROFt%dILLI AI ONGIWWR 1 lAMP LPWD dURVEYOR N' 5066
UfIWN• AAM
Ztd.et94f
h e1'9BpD'w Lm.9, •
APPKOVIT:
OY 1Ht &IIY ON&INOPR Of TNt LNY OF FOKT 4OLLIN4,, LONOCAPO ON 1Nt_PAY OF__A P I16 .
6 " BNGINBEK
APPKOM
eY INt PLANNIM6 AND ZONING SPACP Of IRP L11Y Of fOK1 [ALLINd, LOLOCAPO ON 141j PAY Of A.D I98_
dOCCp7AKY OF PLANNING AMP ZONIN& "KV
a
i
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
PROPOSAL: Ponderosa Park
DESCRIPTION: 20 single family units on 3.69 acres
DENSITY: 5.42 du/acre
General Population
20 (units) x 3.2 (persons/unit) = 64
School Age Population
Elementary - 20 (units)
x.054 (pupils/units)
= 1.08
Junior High - 20 (units)
x.028 (pupils/unit) _
.56
Senior High - 20 (units)
x.025 (pupils/unit) _
.50
Affected Schools
Design
Capacity
Enrollment
Moore Elementary
546
578
Lincoln Junior High
740
704
Poudre Senior High
1260
1122
4F 0
STEWAF<r&AsSOCIATES
Consulting Engineers and Surveyors
March 30, 1987
Mrs. Debbie de Besche
City Planner
City of Fort Collins
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, Colorado 80522
Dear Debbie:
The planning objectives for Ponderosa Park P.U.D. — Amended are as follows:
Because of an over abundance of four—plex lots in Fort Collins and, there—
fore a difficult market for the lots, Mr. Martin desires to amend the P.U.D.
to provide single family detached patio homes. Mr. Martin feels there is a
need for small starter homes in West Fort Collins. The number of units was
reduced from 24 units to 20 units which he feels has a positive impact on the
neighborhood. The traffic impact on Ponderosa Drive and West Mulberry Street
will be reduced.
All of the utilities and the curb and gutter for the cul de sac have
been constructed. Therefore one of the objectives was to utilize these major
improvements. After consultation with the City of Fort Collins planning staff,
it was decided to dedicate the cul de sac, to be known as Ponderosa Court.
The cul de sac will be upgraded to provide City of Fort Collins standard
pavement thicknesses, pavement widths and sidewalks. The parking and land—
scaping in the cul de sac will be a private tract and maintained by the home—
owners.
It is also an objective to upgrade the plantings in the open space. At
least one street tree will also be planted on each lot.
The overall objective is to upgrade the P.U.D. by lowering the density,
providing owner occupied housing rather than rental housing and bringing the
improvements up to City standrads while still remaining in the same market
as the existing neighborhood.
If you have any questions regarding these objectives or the amended
preliminary site plan, please call Mr. Martin or myself.
cls
James H. Stewart
and Associates, Inc.
214 N. Howes Street
PO. Box 429
Ft. Collins, CO 80522
303/482-9331
Sincerely,
a, C
Richard A. Rutherford, P.E. & L.S.
President
PKUJEC r NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER:
ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART
ALL CRITERIA
APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY
Will the criterion
Is the criterion opplicoble? be satisled"
CRITERION Q0„��°F;�° �p °" Yes Na If no, please explain
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY
1, Social Compatibility
2. Neighborhood Character
X
"i'` x
3. Land Use Conflicts
4. Adverse Traffic Impact
X
)C
PLANS AND POLICIES
5. Comprehensive Plan Ix X
PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY
6. Street Capacity
X
X
X
X
K
X
7. Utility Capacity
8. Design Standards
X
9. Emergency Access
X
10. Security Lighting
X
11. Water Hazards
X
RESOURCE PROTECTION
12. Soils & Slope Hazard
X
13, Significant Vegetation
X
14. Wildlife Habitat
X
15. Historical Landmark
x
16. Mineral Deposit
k
17. Eco-Sensitive Areas
X
1& Agricultural Lands
X
ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
19, Air Quality
20. Water Quality
21. Noise
22. Glare & Heat
X
X
"•"x>:
K•
ss
23. Vibrations
ti
24. Exterior Lighting
K
25. Sewage & Wastes
X
SITE DESIGN
26. Community Organization
27. Site Organization
X
X
28. Natural Features
X
29. Energy Conservation
30. Privacy
31. Open Space Arrangement
x
X
32, Building Height
X
X
33. Vehicular Movement
x
1C
34, Vehicular Design
X
X
35. Parking
X
x
36. Active Recreational Areas
X
X
37, Private Outdoor Areas
X
X
38. Pedestrian Convenience
x
X
39. Pedestrian Conflicts
X
40, Landscaping/Open Areas
X
X
41. Landscaping/Buildings
x
X
42. Landscaping/Screening
43. Public Access
X
44. Signs
X
-12-
ACTIVITY: Residential Uses
DEFINITION:
All residential uses. Uses would include single family attached
dwellings, townhomes, duplexes, mobile homes, and multiple family
dwellings; group homes; boarding and rooming houses; fraternity and
sorority houses; nursing homes; public and private schools; public and
non-profit quasi -public recreational uses as a principal use; uses
providing meeting places and places for public assembly with inciden-
tal office space; and child-care centers.
' Each of the following applicable criteria must be
CRITERIA A
answered "yes" and implemented within the development
plan.
Yes No
1. On a gross acreage basis, is the average resi-
dential density in the project at least three (3)
dwelling units per acre (calculated for residential
portion of the site only)? Fx] ❑
2.1 DOES THE PROJECT EARN THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE POINTS
AS CALCULATED ON THE FOLLOWING "DENSITY CHART" FOR ❑
THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT? X
THE REQUIRED EARNED CREDIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL
PROJECT SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
30-40
PERCENTAGE
POINTS =
3-4
DWELLING
UNITS/ACRE;
40-50,PERCENTACa-E_POINTS
=
475
DWELLING
UNITS/ACRE;
50-60
PERCENTAGE
POINTS =
5-6
DWELLING
UNITS/ACRE;
60-70
PERCENTAGE
POINTS =
6-7
DWELLING
UNITS/ACRE;
70-80
PERCENTAGE
POINTS =
7-8
DWELLING
UNITS/ACRE;
80-90
PERCENTAGE
POINTS =
8-9
DWELLING
UNITS/ACRE;
90-100
PERCENTAGE
POINTS
= 9-10 DWELLING
UNITS/ACRE;
1 100 OR
MORE PERCENTAGE POINTS
= 10 OR MORE
DWELLING
UNITS/ACRE.
continued
-29-
i
0
DENSITY CHART
Maximum
Earned
Criterion
Credit
If All Dwelling Units Are Within:
Credit
a
20%
2000 feetof on existing or approved neighborhood shopping center.
b
10%
650 feet of an existing transit shop. LL
C
10%
4000 feet of an existing or approved regional shopping center,
_
w
C /
d
20%
3500 feet of an existing or reserved neighborhood park community park or community foci lity.
Cf A
O
e
10%
1000 feet of a school, meeting all the requirements of the compulsoryeducation laws of the State of Colorado.
�<
W
f
20%
3000 feet of a major employment center. P
9
5%
1000 feet of a child care center.
h
20%
'North" Fort Collins.
I
20%
The Central Business District,
J
10%
A project which has at least 1/6 of its properly boundary contiguous to existing urban development.
k
If it can be demonstrated that the project will reduce non-renewable energy useoge either through the application of alternative energy
systems or through committed energy conservation measures beyond that normally required by City Code, a 5% bonus may be earned
for every 5% reduction in energy use.
Calculate a 1% bonus for every 50 acres included in the project.
—
m
Calculate the percentage of the total acres in the project that are devoted to recreational use, enter 1/2 Of that per centoge as a bonus, • rf
1
n
If the applicant commits to preserving permanent offsite open space that meets the Cltys minimum requirements, calculate the percentage
of this open space acreage to the total development acreage, enter this percentage as a bonus.
.�-
O
If part of the total development budget is to be spent on neighborhood public transit facilities which are not otherwise required by City Code,
enter 2%bonus for every $100 per dwelling unit invested.
IJ
If part of the total development budget is to be spent on neighborhood facilities and services which are not otherwise required by City Code,
enter a 1% bonus for every $100 per dwelling unit invested.
---
q
If a commitment is being modeto develop a specified percentage of the total number of dwelling units for low income families, enter that
percentage as a bonus, up to a maximum of30%.
---�
Z
If a commitment Is being made to develop a specified percentage of the total number of dwelling units for Type'A" and Type "B" handicapped
housing as defined by the City of Fort Collins, calculate the bonus as follows:
itsOrType"A'— 5times Type-A"un—
Total units
iy�>
Type"B"-1.0times Type"B"units
I.LJ
Total
--
In no case shall the combined bonus be greater than 30%.
If the site or adjacent property contains on historic building or place, a bonus may be earned for the following.
3% — For preventing or mitigating outside influences (e.g. environmental, land use, aesthetic. economic and social factors) adverse to Its
S
preservation;
3% — For assuring that new structures will be in keeping with the character of the building or place, while avoiding total units
3% — For proposing adaptive use of the building or place thatwilllead toIts Continuance,preservation and improvement inan
appropriate manner. -
�a
;a
If o portion or all of the required parking in the multiple family project is provided underground, within tnepuilcing, or in an elevated parking
^1
structure ason c cessory use to the primcry structure, a bonus maybe earned as follows:
t
9% _ Forpro :r,g75%norm, r&,ifiip_.r,.:nginastructure;
6% — For providing 50-74% of the parking in a structure;
_-
3% — For providing 25-49 %of the parking in a structure.
'
u
If a commitment is being made to provide approved automatic fire extinguishing systems for the dwelling units. enter a bonus of 10%.
TOTAL �
4 �
-30-
•
•
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY
• 0 N I k • oaf
On March 2, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. at Poudre High School, a neighborhood meet-
ing was held on a proposed project known as Ponderosa Park PUD. Approxi-
mately 497 letters were sent to property owners and utility billing custom-
ers. Debbie deBesche; City Planner, was present from the City Planning
Department. Dick Rutherford and John Martin were present representing the
applicant.
Six residents attended the meeting. The attendance list is attached and
the issues identified at the meeting are as follows:
1. Price range of homes - concerned with the small lots attracting low
income hones.
2. Height of homes.
3. If lots would be sold individually or in a clump to one developer.
4. Will covenants be updated?
5. Will there still be a homeowners association?
6. Concerned with open space included in the original plan would be taken
out.
7. Concerned with weeds in the open space areas. Would like a time limit
for seeding etc., of the open space.
PROJECT:
4
TYPE. OF MEETING:
DATE:
NAME ADDRESS
WRITTEN
NOTIFICATION
YES/NO
OWNER
RENTER
7 3 o
4, l-z 71 Z
/
C