HomeMy WebLinkAboutHOUSKA AUTOMOTIVE EXPANSION - BDR - BDR150010 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS` City of
Fat't ��L�111S
February 24, 201 E
Linda Ripley
Ripley Design, Inc.
419 Canyon Ave
t ,r � -
1'
,,; , � ,, . , --._.�—
— �„ � Community Development and
�= J w; i��� � a��. �� Q:+/�' � Neighborhood Services
281 North Coliege Avenue
� PO Box 580
���` C Fort Collins, CO 80522
V '����~' �� t � � I ; 1� L ( `�'�"- � 970.221.6750
, �1 �; 970.224.6134 - fax
I , �, s . , � �'-�� � /�"��r.f-+ S c'�^� ' fcgov.com/developmentreview
r ' l� � � r �° � � �c���" �('�.
r , �r. � t �{,\ !�='-� �?�;: � �--. �.��� .
,�n� _ . �
� � � {.�
Fort Collins, CO 80521
� :
�y.� f���,�� RE: Houska Automotive Expansion, BDR150010, Round Number 2
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for
your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may
contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Clark Mapes, at
970-221-6225 or cmapes@fcgov.com.
Comment Summarv:
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Clark Mapes, 970-221-6225, cmapes(a�fcgov.com
Topic: General
� ��� `.�-,
G-'���, , � %
�.� ,r �l'
3�,..,
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
12/17/2015: SITE PLAN: Recycle trailer parking: why not put that in a garage? If it
;' ,� must be open, why is the wall 8' tall - what's the determining factor?
- 2/24/2016: Thank you for the answer. Is the dust inhalation something that the
public should not be responsible for? Should there be an internal screen/capture of
this? Why is it OK to externalize that. -For the meeting
� �/`",-f--
� Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mraqasa(c�fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Provide scale for Vacinity Map on the cover sheet of the Utility Plans
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Provide a north arrow on the cover sheet of the Utility Plans
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Provide the project benchmarks on the cover sheet of the Utility Plans.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Please provide legend of symbols for all utility lines, ROW line, lot lines
and easement lines.
Page 1 of 15
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Please label all proposed, existing, and to be removed
utilities(Stormline, inlets, services, etc) on the Overall Utility sheet. See redlines.
Some of the lineweights are difficult to read. Please revise.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Label sizes of water and sanitary sewer mains on the Overall Utility
Sheet.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Please label the total ROW width on Riverside Avenue
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: It appears that the landscape islands/curb encroaches into the
Emergency Access Easement. Please adjust these so that they provide the
required 20' access for emergency vehicles.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Show final configuration of the site on the Overall Utility Plan. The plans
show existing sidewalk with the proposed sidewalk. Maybe add another sheet to the
Utility Plan that shows the existing conditions.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Label the 15' Public Utility Easement as just a"Utility EasemenY' on the
Utility Plan Sheet.
Comment Number: 11
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Shared accesses need to be in an Access Easement. For this property
to be a legal lot, an access easement is need from Riverside Avenue to the
property. See Plat redlines. Detention ponds need to be in a drainage easement. It
appears that portions of the detention areas encroach into the 15' Utility Easement
and does not fall in a drainage easement. Please adjust drainage easement
boundaries. See redlines.
Comment Number: 12
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Please clearly define what portions of the 20' Emergency Access
Easement are being dedicated by the plat and by separate document on the Utility
Plans.
Comment Number: 13
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: The planning objectives state that all utility, stormwater systems and
driveway accesses will be completed with Phase 1. Please list all utilities and
infrastructure that will be completed in Phase 1 in the Utility Plan. A note or table can
be added to the Interim Grading Plan. Show that there will be two phases on this
sheet.
Comment Number: 14
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Since the existing driveway will be removed to the north of the site on
Riverside Avenue, continue the detached sidewalk being shown on the property
further north. See redlines. Label the width of the existing sidewalk to the north.
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Add the following street cut note to the Grading Plan and Overall Utility
Plan:
"LIMITS OF STREET CUT ARE APPROXIMATE. FINAL LIMITS ARE TO BE
DETEREMINEDIN THE FILED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR. ALL
REPAIRS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STREET REPAIR STANDARDS."
Page 2 of 15
Comment Number: 16
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Please add the standard sidewalk repair note to the utility plan and the
site plan:
"Any damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as
streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, destroyed, damaged or removed due to
construction of this project, shall be replaced or restored to City of Fort Collins
standards at the Developer's expense prior to the acceptance of completed
improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy."
Comment Number: 17
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: What is the maximum and minimum width of Riverside Avenue. Will
the proposed cross sections of Riverside work? It appears that the proposed
striping plan of Riverside Avenue won't be sufficient. Please work with traffic
operations to determine the feasibility of the striping plan.
Comment Number: 18
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: The striping plan of Riverside Avenue shows solide lines for the center
turn lanes. An opening will be needed at Lemay Avenue and Mulberry Street for the
left turn lanes. See redlines.
Comment Number: 19
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: Change Detail 709 to D-10B instead. The City no longer uses this
deatail for a sidewalk chase.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 20
Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
12/16/2015: The landscape plan and the utility plans contradict what is happening in
the detention ponds. It appears that the detention pond is immediately adjacent to
the sidewalk. Sidewalk standards require at least 1 foot of flat ground behind the
walk.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 21
12/16/2015: Add the following note to the plat:
"NOTICE:
Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
ALL RESPONSIBILITIES AND COSTS OF OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND
RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PRIVATE STREETS AND/OR DRIVES LOCATIOED
ON THE PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS PLAT SHALL BE
BOURNE BY THE OWNERS OF SAID PROPERTY, EITHER INDIVIDUALLY, OR
COLLECTIVELY, THROUGH A POERPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, IF
APPLICABLE. THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS SHALL HAVE NO OBLIGATION OF
OPERATION, MAINTENANCE OR RECONSTRUCTION OF SUCH PRIVATE
STREETS AND/OR DRIVES NOR SHALL THE CITY HAVE ANY OBLIGATION TO
ACCEPT SUCH STREETS AND/OR DRIVES AS PUBLIC STREETS OR DRIVES."
Comment Number: 22
Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
12/16/2015: Add owner and title commitement notes information on the plat.
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
12/16/2015: Add the following note to the plat:
"There shall be no private conditions, covenants or restrictions that prohibit or limit
the installation of resource conserving equipment or landscaping that are allowed by
sections 12-120 - 12-122 of the City Code."
Page 3 of 15
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
12/17/2015: Label all adjoining properties to the site. �
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
12/17/2015: Drainage easement needs to extend further east to accomodate the
detention area. See redlines.
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
12/17/2015: Show areas of floodplain/floodway on the plat.
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
12/17/2015: Show previous ROW/Easement dedications done for property to the
north on Lot 1. See redlines.
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
12/17/2015: It appears that the existing Emergency Access Easement on Lot 1 is in
the incorrect location. It is being depicted as being next to the property line, however,
there is a landscape area between the lot line and easement. This easement can't
be vacated by the plat until new emergency access is constructed. This will need to
be done by separate document.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette(o�fcqov.com
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/09/2015
02/19/2016: It does not appear that Fixture A was updated to the 3000K version on
the photometric plan - please update. r
12/09/2015: Will any additional lighting be provided on site? If so, please provide a
photometric plan and specifications for the light fixtures that will be used. In regard to
LED light fixtures, cooler color temperatures are harsher at night and cause more
disruption to circadian rhythms for both humans and wildlife. Please consider a
warmer color temperature (closer to 2700K), as well as dimming capabilities, for
any LED light fixtures.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/19/2016
02/19/2016: Please provide cut-sheet information for light fixture B.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan(a�fcqov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015
12/28/2015:
In place of the Lindens used in parking lot areas Honeylocust could be better
adapted to these locations that are dryer and exposed.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/28/2015
12/28/2015:
Provide 20 upsized mitigation trees. The Hackberry are upsized but other trees will
also need to be upsized.
Shade Trees 3.0 inch caliper
Ornamental Trees 2.5 inch caliper
For the bigtooth maple consider specifying them as 6-8 foot clump or equivalent.
Page 4 of 15
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 12/28/2015
12/28/2015:
The first Hackberry from the curb cut is too close to the Sewer line (10 feet
separation needed) and may cause some site distance conflict. It appears this tree
will not work at this location and should be eliminated.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 12/28/2015
12/28/2015:
Show locations of any street lights and if needed provide the tree separations that
meet the LUC standard LUC 3.2.1 K.
40 feet for Shade trees
15 feet for ornamental trees
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 12/28/2015
12/28/2015:
List the percentage of trees used and adjust quantities to meet the minimum
species diversity standard in LUC 3.2.1 D 3. Hackberry is 50% of the trees but will
need to be reduced to 33%. Consider changing 3 or 4 of the Hackberry along
Riverside to Bur Oak.
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland(u)fcqov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 12/15/2015
12/15/2015: Please schedule a pre-submittal meeting for this project. Pre-Submittal
meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the
new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the
adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in
the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective. Applicants of new
commercial or multi-family projects should email scarter@fcgov.com to schedule a
pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor
plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square
footage and type of construction being proposed.
Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter(a�fcqov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Page 5 of 15
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 02/12/2016
02/12/2016: Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as
amended:
2012 International Building Code (IBC)
2012 International Residential Code (IRC)
2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado
2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado
Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the
fcgov.com/building web page to view them.
Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 8� ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009.
Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.
Frost Depth: 30 inches.
Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B.
Seismic Design: Category B.
Climate Zone: Zone 5
Energy Code Use
1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC.
2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter.
3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Coy Althoff, , CAlthoff(a�fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Light 8� Power has primary cable with 3-phase capability running along
both the West and South sides of the property lines.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Development charges, electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges
and any system modification charges necessary will apply to this development.
Please reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee
estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: For commercial services: Please provide a one line diagram and a
C-1 form to Light and Power Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at:
http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1 Form.pdf
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the transformer
and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility plans. Pad
mount transformers must be no more than 10' from a paved surface, have 8'
clearance from the front and 3' clearance around the back and sides.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Streetlights will be placed along public streets. A 40 feet separation on
both sides of the light is required between canopy trees and streetlights. A 15 feet
separation on both sides of the light is required between ornamental trees and
streetlights.
Page 6 of 15
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Please contact Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at
221-6700. Please reference our policies, development charge processes, and use
our fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: No changes or additions on behalf of Light & Power since the last
review.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, ilvnxwiler(a�poudre-fire.orq
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 12/10/2015
12/10/2015: FIRE LANES
Fire access is required to within 150' of all exterior portions of every building. Arterial
roads cannot be used to measure access distances. As such, the proposed site
plan has provided a fire lane internal to the site. The proposed plan appears to be
compliant with the fire code with regard to construction Phases 1& 3. The out of
access condition created in Phase 1 is approximately 65' which is allowable as the
building will be equipped with a fire sprinkler system. The building in Phase 3 is
surrounded by a fire lane and is completely compliant. The out of access condition
created at the time of Phase 2 places the entire building unit well over 600' out of
access (as measured from points internal to the property). In conjunction with the
Phase 2 plan, the project team will need to show how perimeter access can be
ensured in perpetuity on the south, east, and northeast portions of the site (ie.
cross-property agreement, never any obstructions such as fencing, etc.). Code
language provided below.
> IFC 503.1.1: Approved fire Lanes shall be provided for every facility, building or
portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction.
The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section
and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the
exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the building or facility. When any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150
feet from fire apparatus access, the fire code official is authorized to increase the
dimension if the building is equipped throughout with an approved, automatic
fire-sprinkler system.
Page 7 of 15
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 12/10/2015
12/10/2015: SECURITY GATES
Access gates will require design review and approval. This will be applicable to the
vehicular access gate at the main entrance as well as the man gate just west of
Building 1. The vehicle access gate will require a rapid entry, Knox Key Switch on
the electronic entry pad or be equipped with an Opticon sensor device so as be
activated from a fire engine. As the man-gate is integrated into the plan for fire
access, it will need to be able to open from the inside without keys or special needs.
Code language provided below.
> IFC 503.6: The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road
shall be approved by the fire chief. Where security gates are installed, they shall
have an approved means of emergency operation. The security gates and the
emergency operation shall be maintained operational at all times.
2012 IFC D103.5: Gates securing fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all
of the following criteria:
1. The minimum gate width for vehicle access shall be 20 feet.
2. Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type.
3. Construction of gates shall be of materials that allow manual operation by one
person.
4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times and
replaced or repaired when defective.
5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire
department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be
approved by the fire code official.
6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with an unapproved padlock, or chain
and padlock, unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry
tools or when a key box containing the key(s) to the lock is installed at the gate
location.
7. Gate design and locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval by
the fire code official prior to installation.
8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL
325.
9. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and
installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F 2200.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell(a�fcqov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 31
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
OZ/23/2016: Drainage easement shown doesn't match the one shown on the plat.
Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Clarify the extents of the bioswale with a hatch for the footprint of the
bioswale. Also, please clarify if the bioswale is present north of the drive aisle
(adjacent to the water quality pond.)
Comment Number: 33
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The Site Plan indicates rain gardens in two locations but the Utility
Plans indicate only one. Please coordinate/verify.
Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Slope labels and spot elevations need to be added in some locations.
See redlines.
Page 8 of 15
Comment Number: 35
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The grading plan shows a low point at the very southeast corner of the
site. Is this channelized flow that is being directed to the offsite parking lot? This
needs to be detailed somehow. Are you proposing a curb cut, or chase of some
sort?
Comment Number: 36
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The Interim Grading Plan is the first phase of grading and will need to
include certify items like the detention pond, bioswale, rain garden(s), etc. The
design info for these items should be included on the Interim Grading Plan and
detailed on that sheet, not the Phase 2 sheet. The Phase 2 sheet should then only
include grading that is slated to occur with that phase.
Comment Number: 37
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: What are the slopes within the temporary parking lot? Please hatch or
somehow indicate which portion of the parking lot is temporary, like you did with the
Temp Gravel Surface area.
Comment Number: 38
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Storm Pipe 2 and 3 profile indicates that there is no slope from the flat
top manhole junction to the existing pipe. Please revise.
Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Storm Pipe 4 profile indicates that the invert of the outlet structure is
lower than the tie-in elevation to the inlet. The profile also indicates that the invert of
the outlet structure is lower than the pond grading shows. Please revise.
Comment Number: 40
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The outlet structure will need to be designed by you, not others.
Comment Number: 53 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The detail sheets include a standard manhole, but I don't know where
this is being proposed to be installed. Please remove if you're not using it.
Comment Number: 54 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Detail D-10C should be replaced with Detail D-10.
Comment Number: 55 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Detail D-17 Headwalls for Pipes is included but I don't know where this
is being proposed to be installed. Please remove if not using it.
Comment Number: 56 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Include a detail of the outlet structure once its designed.
Topic: Drainage Report
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Complete detention pond information needs to be included on the
drainage plan: water surface elevations for the WQCV and the 100-yr event, volume
of the pond, release rates, etc.
Comment Number: 41 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please clarify the extents of Basin Q3. It looks to be much larger than
0.249 acres.
Comment Number: 42 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: There is a basin at the southern edge of the property that drains offsite.
The extents of this basin need to be shown and quantified and it needs to be
analyzed (runoff calculations) in your report.
Page 9 of 15
Comment Number: 43
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Bioswale 1 is also taking run-on from the Houska site to the west —
what is that run-on area and what is the resulting ratio?
Comment Number: 44
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Does the entire building roof for Bldgs 1 and 2 drain toward the north
and east?
Comment Number: 45
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Per the email correspondence dated 2-2-2016, the LID requirement
can be reduced by the amount of LID treatment located within the regional water
quality pond footprint, however, you're still showing a bio-swale in that location.
Perhaps the bio-swale should be truncated to only be located along the easterly side
of Bldg 2.
Comment Number: 46
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: The grading and drainage plans should show an approximate pipe
alignment under the adjacent drive way to the east for the master plan
improvements. The alignment and invert should be approximated and the water
quality pond should be designed to accommodate this approximate design.
Comment Number: 47
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Complete detention pond information needs to be included on the
drainage plan: water surface elevations for the WQCV and the 100-yr event, volume
of the pond, release rates, etc.
Comment Number: 48
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Urban Drainage spreadsheets can't be used for calculating runoff
because we utilize different rainfall data. Please put together your own spreadsheets
for calculating runoff.
Comment Number: 49
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: • Discussion of certain bullet points included in the email regarding
Houska, dated 2/2/2016, need to be included in the report. Specifically:
• The City will acquire the portion of the area previously allocated to detention for
regional extended detention and an area for conveyance through the site. The City
will either acquire that portion of the property or ask for an easement that
encompasses the regional water quality pond.
• Stormwater will assist in modifying the Masterplan modeling to verify detention
is not needed. Please state that the City of Fort Collins Stormwater Utility has
reviewed the model and has verified that onsite detention is not needed at this site
because this sites storm event peaks well before the system that this site ties into.
- Extended detention for the development will be accomplished within the
regional pond. Please rephrase this to say "regional water quality pond".
• In general, the City acquisition will be offset by the proportional amount of
volume needed for the Houska development vs. the regional volume. "Volume" is
"water quality capture volume or WQCV".
• The City will pay for the design, construction and other costs associated with
the regional pond. The City's preference is to handle that with a reimbursement to
Houska. This doesn't need to be included in the drainage report narrative.
• The development will still need to meet LID standards. We are pursuing the
75% treatment/no pavers criteria. This needs to be discussed/clarified in the
narrative of the report.
• The LID requirement will be offset by the amount of LID treatment lost to
regional pond infrastructure needs (specifically the bioswale along the north and
east property lines needed for regional conveyance). This also needs to be
discussed/clarified in the narrative of the report.
Page 10 of 15
Comment Number: 50
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Discuss standard water quality provisions and LID water quality
treatment requirements. Discuss percentages (standard vs LID) provided at your
site and how the regional water quality pond requires a reduction in LID provisions.
Comment Number: 51
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: For the raingarden calculations, please just use the UD BMP
spreadsheet to calculate the raingarden WQCV and footprint requirements. This
spreadsheet can be downloaded directly from their website.
Comment Number: 52
Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please provide a design for the outlet structure for the pond. The
analysis of this needs to be included in the report. The outlet structure needs to be
sized and drawn to scale in the drawings and a detail of the outlet structure also
needs to be included in the plans.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
02/23/2016: The rain garden will need to be in a drainage easement.
The proposed curb stops need to be in a utility easement that is dedicated on the
plat.
12/14/2015: Plat
- Drainage easements will be needed for the extended detention pond and also for
any other volume-based LID feature on the site.
- The proposed water meters need to be in a utility easement that is dedicated on
the plat.
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam(a�fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 12/08/2015
02/19/2016: Page 11 needs a change to the site name as it appears to be from an
old template in the Erosion Control Report. Erosion Control Escrow will need to be
calculated and submitted. 01/20/2016: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted
do not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan (based upon
comments from emails from 1/20/2016 and an Escrow / Security Calculation. Also
as a heads up, based upon the area of disturbance State permits for stormwater will
be required since the site is over an acre. If you need clarification concerning the
erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam
970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
12/08/2015: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and
Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted. The erosion control requirements
are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter
7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet
requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan (Needs a Sequence Chart),
Erosion Control Report (Was not submitted or was not routed), and an Escrow /
Security Calculation (Was not submitted or was not routed). Also, based upon the
area of disturbance State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is
over an acre. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if
there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @
jschlam@fcgov.com
Contact: Mark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtavlora(�.fcqov.com
Topic: Floodplain
Page 11 of 15
c
Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: On the Site Plan, Grading Plans (Phase 1 and Phase 2), and anywhere �
else applicable; please label the distance between the buiding corners and the
floodplain boundary. We will require that these building corners be staked in the field
prior to construction to insure that the building is not located in the 100-year
floodplain.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountvCa�fcqov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/23/2016: Please remove the "Legal Description", and add "Located in the
Northeast...State of Colorado" back on the sheet.
12/16/2015: Please remove the "Legal Description" & other crossed out text as
marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/23/2016: This is not correct. Please make changes as marked. See redlines.
12/16/2015: Please provide the following information in the EXACT format shown
below.
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM.
SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED FOR
THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE
FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED = NAVD88
- X.XX�.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/23/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
12/16/2015: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Some of the titles in the sheet index do not match the titles on the
noted sheets. See redlines.
Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets.
Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas.
See redlines.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/16/2015
02/23/2016: These were not received.
12/16/2015: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the aliquot
corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at jcounty@fcgov.com
Page 12 of 15
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Are there any Lienholders for this property? If so, please add a
signature block. If not, please add a note stating there are none, and include
response in written comments.
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: There are spelling issues with some text. See redlines.
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please use larger text on the major street names and the word "Site" in
the vicinity map. See redlines.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: All reception numbers for documents recorded by separate document
must be added prior to mylars.
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: What are the extents of the Public Access portion of the 20'
Emergency Access And Public Access Easement? See redlines.
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please add bearings, distances, and/or curve data as marked. See
redlines.
Commeo�t Number: 23 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please make the floodway boundary line darker.
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please add dedication information for all street rights of way. See
redlines.
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Lot 1 can not be 2.490 Acres with right of way being dedicated.
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please label the sq. ft./acreage of the right of way being dedicated.
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please show right of way lines as a solid line. See redlines.
Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please label all surrounding properties with "Unplatted" or the
subdivision name. This includes properties across right of ways. See redlines.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson(a�fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
�L • / 12/17/2015: Are access spacing requirements met between the two access
� r`�/j points?
V � l �
�%�� � Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
X 12/17/2015: The re-striping along Riverside is shown as 10 ft lanes and a 10.5 min
outside lane (next to curb). We indicated in our joint meeting that we need to have
at least 10 ft of asphalt in the outside lane, not including the pan. It is unclear
whether this is what is shown.
Page 13 of 15
n
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/17/2015
12/17/2015: Is there a potential for an access to the south? Or at least a sidewalk? �
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson(a�fcQov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: A landscape plan shall contain accurate and identifiable hydrozones,
including a water budget chart that shows the total annual water use, which shall not
exceed fifteen (15) gallons per square foot over the site. If you have questions
contact Eric Olson at eolson@fcgov.com or 970-221-6704.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
12/14/2015: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit.
The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of
the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric
Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell(c�fcqov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please clarify with notes what is intended to be installed with Phase 2—
such as SOI's or meter pits, etc.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Sewer service to Bldg 2 needs to tap directly into the sewer main, not
the manhole.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Why do you have the 1" domestic water service north and the fire
service south for Bldg 3?
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: Please ensure that there is 5' horizontal separation between water
services and/or water/fire services.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: There are some lines drawn on the Overall Utility Plan that I can't
identify.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 02/23/2016
02/23/2016: See redlines for other minor comments.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals(a�fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/14/2015
02/24/2016: This still has not been corrected.
12/14/2015: On the plat please change the planning signature block to match the
signature block on the site plan set.
Page 14 of 15
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/24/2016
02/24/2016: What is happens in southwest corner of the site?
Page 15 of 15