Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZIEGLER-HARVEST PARK - FDP - FDP140022 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS• � ity of Fort �Collins • Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 NoRh College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/de velopmentreview October 20, 2014 Steve Steinbicker RESPONSE COMMENTS; ARCHITECTURE WEST LLC - NOVEMBER 12, 2014 Architecture West LLC 4710 S. College Ave Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Ziegler-Harvest Park, FDP140022, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Lindsay Ex, at 970-224-6143 or lex@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex(c�fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations ,�mment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/03/2014 10/03/2014: For the elevations, the entries to the buildings are still not aligning with the site plan. Can this be updated? REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/03/2014 10/03/2014: Can you provide photos of the materials you are proposing or a materials board �"�� so we can get a better understanding of what you are suggesting? FINAL SELECTIONS PENDING - MATERIALS AND COLORS LISTED ON THE ELEVATiONS. Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/03/2014 10/03/2014: I have a lot of comments on the overall sidewalk network - see the redlines. The sidewalk network needs to be prioritized a bit more in the design, e.g., from Buildings B and C "� out to Ziegler and then from Building B north to County Fair Lane, etc. „ ADDED STEPPING STONE CONNECTION ON THE WEST SIDE, ALL OTHER WALKS REMAINED AS-IS, NO ADDITIONAL WALKS, REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/03/2014 "10/03/2014: The �nd landscape plans could be simplified b�rnoving the grading lines and the utilities - this will help with overall legibility of the plans. REvisE� Atv� RE-suBnn�nE�. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/03/2014 ` 10/03/2014: On the landscape details sheet, I've made some notes about language that can be removed, see redlines. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirataa(�.fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: The street connection of County Fair Lane and the driveway approach removal both along Ziegler Road needs to both reflect an asphalt patch that encompasses the entire bikelane witlth. REv�sE�. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: For the concrete paving of County Fair Lane, on Sheet 14, the joint pattern should be shown continued out to Ziegler Road, with a note indicating that joint pattern shown is illustrative and final design to be coordinated with City Engineering Inspection in conjunction with a pavement design. It should also be indicated that the concrete panels may need to be dowelled into the curb and gutter depending on the pavement section in the pavement design. REv�SE�. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: The removal of the CDOT M standard M-412-1 is fine (rather than putting an "x" through it) since this is a local street. REv�sE�. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: There appears to be a storm line crossing of County Fair Lane that's less than the 3' standard. The design should be attempting to maximize the cover (options such as elliptical pipe?) PIPE IN THE ROW HAS BEEN CHANGED TO 19"x30" ELLIPTICAL PIPE TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 2.38' OF COVER. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/1512014: The drive approach shown being constructed on the north side of County Fair Lane should show the curb return with the curb head removed where the future sidewalk would extend. REVISED. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originatetl: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: Please provide existing and proposed contours on the plan and profile sheet, as evidence of the roadway and site development being able to be constructed within right-of-way and/or within the development boundary. rtEv�SE�. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: Please provide spot elevations for the County Fair Lane/Ziegler Road intersection in accordance with LCUASS Detail 7-28. Ensure that the transition point to remove the crown of County Fair Lane is depicted as well. REvisE�. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: Does their need to be a restriping of the lane configuration on Saber Cat Drive across the street with the extension of County Fair Lane? It seems that offsetting lefts and the lack of a striped westbound through movement might be of concern. REv�SE�. Topic: General Comment Nu�er: 2 �Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: Is the crosswalk striping across Ziegler Road supported by Traffic Operations? I don't recall that City transportation staff would support this crossing at this uncontrolled location. CROSSWALK STRIPING HAS BEEN REMOVED PER TRAFFIC OPERATIONS REQUEST. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: The street trees along County Fair Lane appear to be up against the curb and gutter, is this intended? REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: On the plat, please remove "Triangle" from the "Sight Distance Triangle Easement" notation. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/03/2014 10/03/2014: Please add a note to the grading and utility plans that states the following: Please see Section 3.4.1 of the Land Use Code for allowable uses within the buffer zone. The buffer zone needs to be labeled on these plans as well. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/03/2014 10/03/2014: A note should be added to the site, landscape, utility, grading, and storm sewer plan that the natural habitat area is meant to be maintained in a native landscape. This will help preserve the intention behind the buffer zones and the natural features into the future. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/03/2014 10/03/2014: I will have Development Agreement language for this project, including a weed management plan, a bond prior to CO for 67% of the planting costs in the buffer zone to ensure this area's success, and a plan for how we'll evaluate success of the buffer zone three years post-construction (the typical time it takes for these areas to establish). connnnENT NorE�. Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan a(�fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: This item may have been part of a previous discussion but am asking for confirmation. Thank You. An apparent storm drain line is shown passing right by the large cottonwood at the southeast portion of the site. Is this line proposed or existing? If proposed the line would need to be repositioned to protect this significant tree. THE TREE AND STORM PIPE ARE EXISTING. Department: Internal Servic� Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex(�a.fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 � Comment Originated: 09/29I2014 09/29/2014: Per Kerri Allison (970.416.2669) with Real Estate Services: Tract A is not actually owned by the City; we only have an easement on it. We are maintaining it, but I need the small block at the bottom of the page 1 of the plat to say the city will be deeded the property by a separate document. COMMENT NOTED, THIS IS IN PROCESS. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: From Todd Reidenbach (GIS) 1. Addresses will be assigned by the GIS Department after the plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. ConnnnENT NOTE�. 2. Projects with three or more tenant units require the Unit Level Addressing form to be completed and submitted to the GIS Department once plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. This can occur anytime during construction, but before any utilities or address signs are installed. All addressing will be determined by the GIS Department and submitted to Poudre Fire Authority, USPS, Building Services, and Fort Collins Utilities. Failure to contact GIS and determining addresses through other means may result in address changes. COMMENT NOTED. The Unit Level Addressing form can be obtained by contacting the GIS office at gis@fcgov.com or (970) 416-2483. NOTE�. Todd Reidenbach, GISP GIS Mapping Specialist treidenbach@fcgov.com 970.416.2483 Work Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland a(�.fcqov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 2 10/14/2014: Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting COMMENTS NOTED. Pre-Submittal meetings are offered to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the tlesign, that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 Internati� Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the�te of Coloratlo 2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use 1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC. 2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter. 3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter. Fort Collins Green Code Amendments effective starting 1-1-2012. A copy of these requirements can be obtained at the Building Office or contact the above phone number. Ziegler Harvest park — project specific concerns: connnnENTs NOTE�. 1. Fire-sprinkler systems are required. A new code amendment effective in 2014 will require a full NFPA-13 sprinkler system and not allow a 13-R system. 2. Bedroom egress windows required below 4th floor regardless of fire-sprinkler. 3. All windows above the 1 st floor require minimum sill height of 24" 4. Building code and State statute CRS 9-5 requires project provide accessible units. 5. New Green Code requires: a. Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat or cooling, b. Exterior walls and roof must meet a STC (sound resistance) rating of 40 min. if building located within 1000ft to train tracks. c. Low-flow Watersense plumbing fixtures (toilet, faucets, shower heads) are required. d. Special combustion safety requirements for natural draft gas appliances. e. Low VOC interior finishes. City of Fort Collins Building Services Plan Review 416-2341 Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/22/2014 09/22/2014: From Bob Rulli at Comcast (970.490.7503 or robert.rulli@centurylink.com) 1. Noted on sheet 7 is relocation of existing telco pedestals. This is billable to developer. appears to be minor and I believe it is the end of the line so not a huge expense to relocate. COMMENT NOTED. 2. This access ped is also the developer start point for service to these proposed townhomes. Per PUC tariff, developer responsible to provide conduit backbone and laterals to each building from this si�oint. Route TBD This needs to be �tlinated with myself for cable placement in developer conduit to provide service here. Typical Centurylink conduit specification apply. Space on units for demarcation necessary . Nothing out of the usual noted. COMMENTS NOTED. 3. Lastly, PLAT could use contact update. My name ok, but current phone is 490.7503 at address 3702 Automation Way Suite 106 (Eastbrook office was relocated here about 7 years ago) CONTACT INFO ON THE UTILITY PLAN COVER SHEET HAS BEEN UPDATED. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/03/2014 10/03/2014: From Terry Farrill (970.226.3104, ext. 104) with the Fort Collins Loveland Water District: 1. There are reimbursements requiretl for the existing water and sanitary facilities. The District will require payment of the reiimbursements prior to connection to existing facilities. connnnENT NOTE�. 2. The South Fort Collins Sanitation District will require the property to petition into the District prior to approval. The petition process takes approximately 2 months. COMMENT NOTED, IN - PROGRESS. Additional comments will be provided when the construction drawings are submitted for review. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler(a�poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: 2012 IFC CODE ADOPTION The Poudre Fire Authority and the City of Fort have adopted the 2012 International Fire Code. Building plan reviews shall be subject to the adopted version of the fire code in place at the time of plan review submittal and permit application. connnnENT NOTE�. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: FIRE ACCESS COMMENTS NOTED. > A portion of the fire lane is labeled as being surfaced with "proposed light duty PCC pavement." Please note: all portions of the fire lane shall be required to support 40 tons. > Turning radii of the hammerhead have not been included in the dedicated EAE. Turning radii shall be a minimum of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION COMMENT NOTED AND RE-SUBMITfED. A plan for addressing these units shall be submitted for review and approval. A monument sign will be required. > 2012 IFC 505.1: New and existing buildings shall have approvetl address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible, visible from the street or road fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of six-inch numerals on a contrasting background. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: �LIC-SAFETY RADIO AMPLIFICATION S�EM COMMENT NOTED. New buildings require a fire department, emergency communication system evaluation after the core/shell but prior to final build out. For the purposes of this section, fire walls shall not be used to define separate buildings. Where adequate radio coverage cannot be established within a building, public-safety radio amplification systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with criteria established by the Poudre Fire Authority. Poudre Fire Authority Bureau Admin Policy #07-01 Follow-up to staff meeting: The fire marshal has been out of the office and I haven't been able to meet with him to discuss is each building will require a radio communication evaluation however, this shall not hold up the development review process and may be deferred to the plan review stage. COMMENT NOTED, AWAITING FURTHER DISCUSSION. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, Ischlam an.fcqov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: See redlines from 10/7/2014 for corrections in the Erosion Control Plan. Erosion Control Report was missing an actual percent of "Original Vegetation". Also, IP is ineffective as a BMP for a Sediment Basin please place an adequate BMP detail to be used at the outlet structure box that will reduce sediment from leaving the site and accommodate that volume of water. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fc o�m REVISED. Contact: Mark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtaylor fcgov.com Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/17/2014 10/17/2014: On the Site Plan, please label the 100-year floodplain as "100-year Floodway and Floodplain Boundary" and please draw arrows to both the north and south sides of the flo0dplain. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/17/2014 10/17/2014: On the Drainage Plan (Sheet 15 of 24), please add a 5th note: Temporary or Permanent Storage of Equipment and Materials is not allowed within the 100-year floodway. REv�sE�. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/17/2014 10/17/2014: On the Drainage Plan (Sheet 15 of 24), as of the first of the year, the City is using the NAVD1988 elevation tlatum, rather than NGVD1929. Due to this, please change the elevation datum on all cross sections to match NAVD88 elevations. The conversion between the two at this location is NGVD29 + 3.19 feet = NAVD88 REVISED. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/17/2014 10/17/2014: On the Drainage Plan (Sheet 15 of 24), also because of the change in elevation datums and the fact that the conversion between datums is not a whole number, the BFE lines shown are no longer accurate. Please remove them. REv�sEo. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/17/2014 10/17/2014: In the Drainage Report, in the last paragraph of page 1, when discussing the McClelland's floodplain and the mapping, reference the McClelland's Master Drainage Plan Update by Icon En�ring, dated November 30, 2003. REv�s� Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 10/17/2014 10/17/2014: In the Drainage Report, although this is not a FEMA floodplain, we still require that a copy of the FEMA FIRM panet w/the site location highlighted be included in the report. REv�sE�. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque(�fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: Please provide a riprap detail. Riprap needs to be buried with 6 inches of topsoil and have temporary erosion control. RIPRAP DETAIL IS ON SHEET 17. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: Please revise underdrain detail to replace the fabric layer with a pea gravei layer. REVISED. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: Please label all storm sewers as public or private on the profiles. REVISED. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: The WQ detail is missing the water quality hole diameter and number of columns. Please revise. REvisEo. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: Please provide 10 feet of separation between trees and the storm sewers. The tree next to the water quality pond outlet structure and the tree at the corner of Ziegler and County Fair are too close. THE TREE AND STORM PIPE ARE EXISTING. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/15/2014 10/15/2014: Finalization of the land transfer located within the floodplain needs to occur. COMMENT NOTED, IN - PROGRESS. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcountvC�fcqov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 10/14/2014: No comments. Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/1412014: Sheet 24 was missing from our review set. DE�ETE�. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: There are cut off text issues. See redlines. REVISED AND RE-SUBMrrr'ED. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: No plans were provided for review. RE-SUBnn�nE�. 0 Topic: Site Plan � Comment NumZ%r: 10 •Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: There are text over text issues. See redlines. REv�sE� AN� RE-SUBnnirT'E�. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: There is duplicated text. See redlines. REvisE� arv� RE-suBnn�nE�. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: There are spelling issues with some text. See redlines. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson(a�fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: Replace General Note 32 with the following text: 2.PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION THAT WILL AFFECT TRAFFIC SIGNS OF ANY TYPE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS TRAFFIC OPERATION'S DEPARTMENT OF THE NUMBER, TYPE, AND LOCATION OF THE SIGNS BEING REMOVED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH REMOVING AND REPLACING THE SIGNS SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. REv�sE�. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: Please revise the Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes to state the Local Entity Traffic Engineer at all instances that the NOTES currently state the Local Entity Engineer. This is a permanent revision for Fort Collins Signing and Marking Notes. Please revise your files to reflect the revision. This impacts tra�c notes 6, 11 and 14. (Note 14 needs to be revised in two locations). REv�SE�. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: On the striping plan please remove the stop bar and both crosswalks. rtEv�sE�. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: On the striping plan you'll need to work with the School District to revise their westbound striping on SaberCat as it approaches Ziegler to reflect the 4-legged intersection (it currently only has right and left arrows). The solution is likely to remove the right only arrow and signage). Steve Gilchrist in our office (224-6175) can help coordinate this. School district contact is Pete Hall - Director of Facilities phall@psdschools.org or 970-490-3425. Or contact his office administrator Leigh Anne Williamson at 490-3537. Ps� cotvTacTE�, REVISED. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/14/2014 10/14/2014: Transportation Planning would like to know where are the outdoor bike parking spaces? ThOSe ShOUId be deplCt2d OCl th@ jJIaI1S. RACK LOCATION NOTED ON PLAN. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson(c�fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Numbe�1 �ment Originated: 10/02/2014 10/02/2014: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions o�,tlined in Section 3,2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com COMMENT NOTED. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, Topic: General 970-416-2313, nbeals(a�fcqov.com Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/13/2014 10/13/2014: 04/01/2013: The building elevations do not match the building footprints on the site plan. This will need to be revised so that they do match. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/13/2014 10/13/2014: The elevations, site plan and landscape plan shall include the locations of the mechanical/utility (vents, flues, meters, boxes, conduit, HVAC...) equipment with notes on how SUCh eqUlpmeflt IS SCI'8211@d/palftt@d. NOTED, REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/13/2014 10/13/2014: On the landscape plan on the southend, there appears to be landscaping proposed on top of sidewalk and paved driveways. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. The southend needs something to prevent vehicles driving on top of the landscaped area, either vertical curb and gutter or wheel stops. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/13/2014 10/13/2014: Please change the signature block on the site plan and the plat from Director of Planning to Director of Community Development and Neighborhood Services. REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/13/2014 10/13/2014: Zoning echoes the comments made by planning concerning the sidewalk network. ADDED STEPPING STONE CONNECTION ON THE WEST SIDE, ALL OTHER WALKS REMAINED AS-IS, NO ADDITIONAL WALKS, REVISED AND RE-SUBMITTED. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/13/2014 10/13/2014: The submitted existing tree and landscape plan seems to be for Lot 1 and not Lot 2 of Ziegler Harvest Park. LOT 1 TREE MITIGATION (NOTED -°M°) PROVIDED ON LOT 2.