HomeMy WebLinkAboutLINK-N-GREENS ANNEXATION & ZONING - 49-87, A - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES•
\
PIANNING AND ZONING BOARD
• �I�'.,0��
� ��
AUGUST 24, 1987
The r�ular meeting of the Plannirx� and Zoning Board was called to order ar
6:33 p.m. in Co�ancil Chambers of �1ew City Ha11, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort
Collins, Colorado. Board member.s present were Dave Edwards, Sanford Kern,
Laurie 0'Dell, Don Crews, Linda Lang (arriving at 6:37 p.m.), l3ernie Stran,
and Alternate Jim Klataske.
Boani m�.�rnbers who attended the August 21 work session included Lbn Crews,
Laurie 0'Dell, Bernie Strom, Dave Edwarr3s, and Jim Klataske. Excused were
Lirx9a Lang, Sharon Brown, and Sanford Kern.
Staff inembers present at the Board meeting included Tom Peterson, Joe
Frank, Debbie deBesche, Ted Shepard, Gail Ault, Jim Newell and Mike Herzig.
Legal repr�sentative was Paul Eckman.
Planning Director, Tom Peterson, reviewed the Consent Agenda noting staff
was requesting item 69-84E Fort Ram Village PUD, lst Filit�g - Final be
pullF:d. Ttems remainirx� on the Consent Agenda were 1) Mir�utes of the July
27, 1987 meeting, 2) #25-81D Villages at Harmony West, 2rid Filing, Tracts
B,C,D,F,H, and G- Preliminary - One Year Extension, 4) #23-87B Oak Ridge
West, lst Filing, Healthcare International- Final, 5) �17-87 Ponderosa Park
� P[1D Replat - Final, 6) �47-87,A Vine Drive Business Park Annexation and
Zoning 7) #12-87,A Albrecht Annexation and Zoning, 8) �49-87,A Link-N-
Greens Annexation arxi Zoning, ar�d 9) #46-87 Rissell Irroestments Rezoning
-County Referral. Poard Member Edwards irx�icated he would abstain f ran item
4 due to conElict �f interest. Member 0'Dell moved to approve the Consent
Agenda items 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. Member Edwards seoonded. Motion car-
ried 7-0. Member Rern moved to approve item 4 on the Consent Agenda. Mem-
ber Stran seconded. Motion passed 6-0.
FORT RAM VILLAGE PUD, lst FILING - Final -#69-84E
Chairman Crews and Sarx]y Kern noted a perceived conEtict arxi a�staineci frcxn
the vote.
Staff inember C�bbie deBesche gave project description.
Frank Vaught stated he was r.epresenting the developer. He commented he did
not have a presentation ready since he felt there would not be oppasition
in regards to the project. He explained the proposed reduction in density
for the pr�ject. He statec� there would be approximately a 20$ decrease in
units, f rom 312 to 218. He indicated there would be adequate parking
available. The required spaces for parking were 401 but they would be pro-
vidir►� 491 spaces. ..
Debbie deResche 5tated staff recommends approval with one condition: that
� the project would be contingent upon the developer closing the transaction '
with CSU before December 31, ].987. She stated if the project was not
closed before this date the approval would be considered void. .
�