The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTHE LODGE AT MIRAMONT PUD - FINAL - 54-87AQ - CORRESPONDENCE - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEW.1�pr• :09-99 20:05 -�: City of ]Fort Collins P.02 � � ��-o[� Community Planning and Environmental :�ervices Current Planning April 9, 1999 Ms. Linda Ripley VF Ripley and Associat�s 1113 Stoney Hill Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Ms. Ripley: For your information, I have attached a copy of Staff's preliminary comments concerning the Development Plan on a site located on the northwest intersection of Boardwalk Drive and Lemay Avenue. This potential development of 96 dwelling units was presented before the Conceptual ReviewTeam on April 5, 1999. The conceptual review comments are offered informally by Staff to assist you in preparing the detailed components of the project application. Add,'tional comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Modifications and additions to these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project and all code Provisions of the Land Use Code must.be addressed in your burden of proof narrative and development plans. If'you should have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the review process, please feel free to call me at 970.2:21:6750. Sincerel , �� . 4 Ronald G. Fuehs City Planner cc: Eric Bracke Stormwater Department Engineering File C:1My Documentslf'lanning Document�Mvunta�n View Apartments concrpt review letter.doc �, - - --- 2.L�1 Norlh Co11c�c AVci�tjc • T'C�. Rt�x 5Rf1 • F�rl Co11in�, CC.) $Q522d15RQ •(97A) 22'I-(,Tf1. • FAX (97(I) 4'lli�•?02�� APR-09-1999 20�20 98i P•02 +.Apr�09-99 20:05 � � P.03 iF TAFF , MNCGIVTS CONCEi'TUA,L REV W S CO Cily ciE Furt C'.ollin, � MEETING DATE: ITEM; APFLICANT: April 5, 1999 Mountain View Apartments Ms. linda Ripley LAND USE DATA; Request to develop 96 dweiling units on a site located on the northwest intersection of Boardwalk Drive and Lemay Avenue. DEPARTMENTAL CONTACTS: Current Planning- Advance Planning- Zoning Department- Engineering Depariment- Street Oversizirig Coordinator- City Tra�fic Engineer- Poudre Fire Aulhority- Stormwater Utilities- Stormwater Utilities- Water & Sewer Utilities- Natural Resources Development Planner- Light and Power- Historie Preservation- Transportation Planning- Transportation Services- Farks and Recreation- COMMENTS: Ron Fuchs Clark Mapes Gary Lopez Tim Blandford Matt BaRer Eric Bracke Ron Gonzales Glen Schlueter Matt Fater Roger Buffington Kim Kreicneyer Rob Irish Karen McWilliams John Daggett Kathleen Reavis Janet Meisel-Burns 970.221-6750 970.221.6754 970.221.6T6D 970.221.6605 970.224.6108 970.224.6062 970.221.6570 970.221.6681 970.416.2146 970.221.6681 970.221,6750 970.221.6700 970.221.6376 970.224.6190 970,224.6140 970.221.6367 Gary Lopez of the Zoning Department offered the following comments: a. The site is located in the MMN Zone District and the project will be regulated under the Land Use Code (LUC), b. The proposed use(s) are subject to Type I review. c. All modifications to code standards will be reviewed by the P(anning and Zoning Board, d. This development must comply with all appticable General Development Standards as set forth in Article 3 of the Land Use Code, including but not limited to the requirements for vehicle and bicycle parking, parking, building setbacks, landscaping, et cetera. These development standards are set forth in the following divisions: 1) Division 3.1 General Provisions 2) Division 3.2 Site Planning and Design Standa�ds 3) Division 3.3 Engineering Standards 4) Division 3.4 Environmental, Naturat Area, Recreational and Cultural Resource Protection Standards C�MMUNi�� ti� r�.nnn:inc: ANI7 F.NVIRUV�ICN1'AL SL'ItV1(�N:�; <'I:RRF.NT I�i.ANNI\'t; l?1;1111:1'MF'.I�T l?81 N. Cull��,� Avc. Cli. B�rx tiNU hnri ('cil�in:5, �'(.) HIl�,?,2 ll?AU {'9�ti)'1'.1-f,?;�U APR-09-1999 20�20 9Bi P.03 �Rpr--09-99 20:05 � � P.04 5) Division 3.5 Building Standards 6) Division 3.6 Transpo�tation and Circulafion 7) Division 3.7 Compact Urban Growth Standards 8) Division 3;8 Supplementary Regulations e. All sections of LUC Division 4.5 of the Land. Use Code need to be cornplied with. 2. Glen Schlueter o( the Stormwater Utility offered the following comments; a. This site is in the McClellands/Mail Creek basin where the fees are $3,717/acre, which is based on the amount of imperviousness. The site is als� located in inventory grid #9R. b. The existing detention on this site does not serve this development sv the pond will need to be enlarged to account for the additional irnperviousness created by this site. c. There is a drainage easement along Lemay for a storm sewer and along #he north property line of fhe site. The Building D location might be too close to that line. This sewer serves the Courtyards at Miramont. ` d. The existing detention was sized with the old rainfafl criteria. This site might be able to use the old criteria, as long as the model is with the new criteria to assess the impaet of that on the site. e. A water quality feature is required. The existing pond can be retrofitted to serve. that purpose. 3. Tim Blandford of the Engineering DeparCment offered the following comments: a. Street oversizing fees will apply to lhis developmeni. The streei oversizing fees wil! be as follows� o Multi-Family Residential -$1,021 per dweiling unit Please contact Matt Baker for additional information regarding the actual fees related to your proposed developrnent. b. A Transportation Impact Sfudy (TIS) is reguired with your Froject Development Plan (PDP) submittal, To coordinate the parameters of this study, please contact Eric Bracke, the City's Traffic Engineer, and Kathleen Reavis, the City's Transportation Planner. c. Categorization ot interior roadways will be based on traffic volumes per the TIS. d. Roadway improvements to City standards along Boardwalk and Lemay are required. e. Access points need to align with existing access points onto Boardwalk. f. Pedestrian connection points are needed to the west and north properties. g. The standard utility plan rnust be submitted to the Ciry forreview and approval. A development agreement will be done for this project. h. A development construction permit is required. i. Coordinate all street engineering needs th�ough the En,gineering Department. 4. Kathleen Reavis of Transportatlon Planning offers the following comments` a. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) update is required with your submiital. Please call to coordinate the parameters of this study. b. All street, pedestrian and bike corridors shall be accommodated and connect fo adjacent and proposed facilities. 5. Roger BuHington of the Water & Wastewater Utility offers the following comments: a. Please note there may be re-pay agreement for infrastructure. b. The water system will need to be looped with a minimum of two points. z APR-09-1999 20:21 98i P.04 �kpr-�9-99 20:05 P.05 ,� � c. All applicabie water rights, conservation standards; plant investment fees, et cetera apply tb this development. d: Coordinate infrastructure needs through the Wate� and Wastewater Utility Department. 6. Kim Kreimeyer the PVatural Resources Development Planner offers the following comments:. a You will need #o file a fugitive dust control permit and coordinate this througti the Larimer County Environmental Health Department. Please contact them directly. b. Provide adequate dumpster and trash enclosure area to accommodate a reeycling container(s}. c. One trash hauler should be used to minimize traffic impact as well as impact on the roads. d. Native grasses and plant materials should be used wherever appropriate and blueg�ass should be minimized. 7. Poudre Fire Department: a. Please contact Ron Gonzales with Poudre Fire Authority to discuss requirements. 8. Rob Irish from Light and Power offers the following comments: a. Existing electric facilities along Lemay and Boardwalk. b. All utilities shali be placed underground. c. Any modi�cation of existing electrical facilities will be at the developer's expense. d. The applicanUdeveloper shall acquire all necessary access corridors/easements.. e. The normal electric development charges will apply to this project. f. Coordinate all utility loeations with Light and Power. 9. Janet Meisel-Burns frorn Parks and Recreation offers the following; a. Neighborhood Park and Community Park fees will apply to this project. b. Consider 6erming, vegetation, and wrought iron fencing to separate this site from pa�klands to the west and north. c. Accommodate fhe need for trail connections into che park areas. d. Coordinate all park concerns with Parlcs and Recreatlon. 12. The Current Planning Department offers the following comments: a. This development request will be subject to the Development Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Current Ptanning Department office. The fees are due at the time of submittal of the required Project Development Plan and compliance phases of the development review by City staff and affected outside reviewing agencies. b. This development proposal is subject to all the requirements as set forth in the City's Land Use Cvde (LUC), specifically: Articles 2. Administration (Development Review Procedures); Article 3. General Development Standards; and, Article 4. (Zoning] Districts (Section 4.5). c. Section 3.5.1(A)-(H) requires all buildings to achieve a compatible design characteristic. d. Per Section 3.5.2(C)(1) —(2) requires that multi-family entrances be orientated to an adjacent street to the maximum extent practicable. The front fa�ade's primary entrance needs to be connected via a walkway to a sfreet within two hundred (200) feet. Note the private drive lanes may not suffice to meet these criteria. 3 APR-09-1999 20�21 98i P.05 �Pr-V9-99 20:06 � � P.06 e. Per LUC Section 3.5.2 (E) -(F) the design of the garage elevations must be sensitive to the overall development and dormers or gables should break up the roofline. Note fhat the backside should feature architectural details to break up long blank walls. f. The site plan should include building envelopelfootprint dimensions and disiance to nearest property lines. g. Landscape and utility plans, including street tree locations shall meet spacing distances according to Land Use Code Section 3.2.1. h. Please address Section 4.5 Medium Density Mixed-Use Neighborhofld District (M-M-N) since it requires adherence to specific dens'ity and block standards.. i, Show existing trees (including species and diameter) and designate whether they are to remain or be removed. j. A neighborhood meeting should be held for this developrnent proposal prior to formal submittal of the request (Section 2.2.2 of fhe LUC). Please contact Ron Fuchs of this office to assist you in the scheduling of this meeting. k. All modifications to code standards will be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board. I. The burden of demonstrating compliance with all Land Use Code eriteria is with the applicant: 4 � �PQ_DIQ_1 QQQ �c,:» 98X P, 06