HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.A.T. 22ND FILING, COMMUNITY HORTICULTURE CENTER PDP & FDP - 53-85AV / AZ - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS (5)� r�, Y
� �
EDAW INC
240 EAST MOUNTAIN AVE
FOAT COLLINS COLORADO
80524
TEl 970 484 6073
FAX 97D 484 8518
www.edaw.c.om
�
To Steve Olt
F R O M David Stipe
DATE
cc
�
December 3, 2001
Greg Hurst; Marc Virata, Wes Lamarque, Steve Seefeld
MEMORANDUM
s u a � e c T Resp.onse to written comments concerning utilities for the Fort Collins
Horticulture Center PDP submittal date 4-20-01
Gentlemen,
The following is a series of written responses to your written comments. Please refer to your
aomment sheets for clarification. You will find a written response to each of your comments
on the plans next to the comment.
Resaonse to Tom Reiff s comments dated October 31, 2001
1. Th..e edge of walk is 3'+ away for the top of the box culvert, no railing will be required.
2.. No perimeter fence is being constructed in this phase.
Resaonse_ to. Len_Hilderbrand's comments dated October 31, 2001
1. No trees will be planted within 4' of the gas line.
Response to Engineering comments_dated__October_31,2001
1. The name of the project is CAT 22nd Filing "Community Horticultural Center''. The
drawings ha�e been changed.
2. All off-site easements are being provided by Mike Lang of Sear Brown.
3. The plat language was discussed in a meeting on November 14, 2001. The eurrent plat
reflects the decisions made in this meeting. �
4. There is only one grading plan in the current set of drawings.
5.. The notes on the utility drawing have been changed according to decisions made in a
meeting held November l4, 2001.
Resnonse to Stormwater comments date October 31, 2001
l. The walks have 3'+ of landscape between them and the headwalls of the culverts, no
handrails should be needed.
_ _. . _
2. No fence will be constructed around the site in the phase.
DE-SIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WOR_LDWfDf
� � �
Response to We Lamarque's comments dated October 24, 2001
1. No structure will be eonstructed in the flood plain in this phase of construction. The permit
will be kept on �le in Jim Clark's office.
2. The floodway/floodplain line is not required on the plat by the Real Estate Department.
3. The most recent floodplain line was included in the d�awi'ng set for the submittaL
4. The dumpster has been anchored to the ground. See detail on sheet 11 of the drawings. The
dumpster can't be moved out of the floodplain, it needs to stay in the parking lot for access
reasons.
5. All benehes and bike racks will be anchored into the ground for floodplain and security
reasons. A note has been put on the cover (#26) and this has been spelled out in the Drainage
Report.
6. Done
7. Need to get map from Anderson Consulting Engineers. Will provide by December 5,2001.
8. A note has been placed on the site plan and it is mentioned in the drainage report
9. Base flood elevation line is provided on sheet 4, the section lines are proyided on sheets 6&
Response to Erosion/Sediment Control comments dated October 31. 2001
l. A meeting was held with Bob Zakely to diseuss erosion control�,issues.
20: All of the onsite drainage improvements are represented on the plat either with the note on
sheet one or with a centerline alignment and a defned width,
21. A section for the A1 spillway is shown on sheet 7 of the drawing set.
22. All storm pipes requiring rip rap have corresponding caleulations on the last page of the
drainage report. The 4" DIP pipes from the two remaining sedimentation ponds are not
intended to carry stormwater.
23. The contours have been shown.
_ _
24, All utilities have been shown on the landscape plans.
25. Provided on sheet 10.
26. Rip rap calcs are on the last page of drainage report.
Response to Marc Virata's comments dated October24, 2001
3l . Show on all plans.
D�ESIGN. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WO�RLOWiDE
. � �i
� �
32. The grading plan in the site plan documents has been incorp:orated into the utility
drawings.
33. Spots for the maintenance area appear on th..e grading pla.ns.
34. CSURF is a signatory on the plans because Roland Moore Drive is being partially built on
their pr.operty.
35.. Ezisting contours show up as dashed where pos.sible. The base information provided by
the city contains some line which we can not manipulate.
36. Limits of street repair note appears on sheet 5.
37. Letters of intent will be provide for the project through Steve Seefeld's offiee.
38: Noted on sheet 13.
Resnonse to Jeff Hills comments dated October 24, 2001
11. No permanent structures are being shown in any easement.
12. All utilities are showrr on the landscape plan and the trees haxe been moved fo fhe
distances from the lines required.
13� All pro�les are shown on sheet 10:
14: The word "note" is being changed to notice to refer to the noti:ce on the first sheet of the
plat.
15. Abandonment procedures are spelled out in the notes on sheet 5.
16. All fittings have been called out.
17. Minimum cover'is maintained over all underground utilifies.
18. On Sheet 5.
i•
�
��. �/� ��a
� ��� �r.r►�
�. . �• �
� . .�-
DESIGN_, PLANNJNG AND ENVIRONMENTS WO�RLOWIDE
�,
•
C
PROJECT TRANSMITTAI.
Fort Collins Community I3orticultural Center — Project #7F082.10
Date: December 3, 2001
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
Jim Clark, Project Manager
Tim Buchanan, City Forester
Forestry/Horticultural Division
281 North College
Fort Collins, CO 80524
970-221-6586 (fax)
970 221-6881
iclarK @ ci. fort-collins.co: us
tbuchanan @ ci. fort-collins.00:ns
Please coute the attached PDP drawings, memos as bundled.
Steve Olt, Planning Department
1-Utility drawing set
1-Landscape Plan
1-Site Plan
1-Written reponse memo
1-Comment letter
Steve Seefeld, City Project Coordinator
1-Utility drawing set
1-Site Plan
1-Landscape Plan
1-Written reponse memo
Jim Clark, Forestry
1-Utility drawing set
1-Site Plan
1-Landscape Plan
1-Written ResponSe Memo
Marc Virata, Engineering
1-Utility drawing set
1-Site Plan
1-Landscape Plan
1-Written reponse inemo
1-Redline set
1-Comment sheet
Fax ( pages incl. cover)
Mail E-Mail Overnight
EDAW, Inc.
240 East Mountain Ave..
Fort Coliins, CO 80524
970-484-6073
FAX 970-484=SS l 8
Wes Lamarque, Stormwater
1-Ufility drawing set
1=Site Plan �
1-Landscape Plan
�` �
I -Written response memo
1-Drainage Report
I-Redlined Drainage Report
1-Redlined set
l-Comment sheet
Jeff Hill, Utilities
1-Utility drawing set
1-Site Plan
1-Landscape Plan
1-Written response memo
1-Redlined set
1-Comment Sheet
Ron Mills, Zoning
1-Plat
�
If i e anyone please let us know and we will get you what you need.
Da ' hpe, �
Project Manager