The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLOAF N JUG - PDP - PDP180004 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS (2)� � City of F'ort Callins April 19, 2018 Kamal Bargoti Loaf N Jug 442 Keeler Pkwy Pueblo, CO 81001 RE: Loaf N Jug, PDP180004, Round Number 1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Pete Wray, at 970-221-6754 or pwray@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Katie Andrews, 970-221-6501, kandrews(o�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: The sidewalks along the frontage road should be fully detached. We have approved variances to allow attached walks along right turn lanes in areas where the turn lane is short and the space is constrained, a detailed variance would need to be submitted for Engineering to allow for the attached walks in this situation. Pavement Engineer Tom Knostman has also made the comment that the sidewalks need to be detached on this roadway for snow clearing. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: Per LCUASS 7.7.2, 4:1 is max slope allowed in the public ROW, anything greater must be approved via variance request. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: The right turn lane should be 11 feet wide per LCUASS Figure 8-9. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: The private access should be designed as a drive approach (Detail 707.1) with concrete to the back of walk rather than a cross pan. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: The maximum private drive width is 36 feet without a median. Wider driveways require a median not less than 6 feet wide — see detail 707.1. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: On the horizontal control plan, please label all lane widths, parkway width, as well as taper/storage length of the right turn lane. Page 1 of 14 Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 '` 04/16/2018: Please demonstrate that the trees shown in the sight distance triangle meet the sight distance criteria. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: On the horizontal control plan, there seems to be a drainage pan in the middle of what is being labeled as the bike lane? Is this what is being proposed? How much clear space is available for the bikes in this location? Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: The standard cross section that is being shown for the Major Collector, the 76 feet of ROW width, is the standard at intersections, if this is the intent please label this as being the intersection cross section. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: For final: we won't allow the sawcut in the bike lane, it should be on the lane line or in the middle of the vehicle travel lane. See LCUASS Chapter 25 for more information. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: Engineering needs to receive and address any desired variances prior to hearing. The sidewalk needs to be detached or approved, via variance request, as attached prior to hearing. The driveway design also needs to be addressed prior to hearing. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: Please submit variance requests in accordance with the requirements of LCUASS 1.9.4. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/16/2018: This PDP review is comprised of both PDP and FDP level comments; however, when a more comprehensive FDP plan set is submitted and reviewed, more FDP comments may be provided by Engineering. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak(a�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: An Ecological Characterization Study (ECS) received NOV 2017. Site vegetation is mostly weed species (kochia, thistle) with some native rabbitbrush and cottonwoods. Project contains an active black-tailed prairie dog colony larger than one acre in size with approximately 35-40 burrows. "No ordinary high water mark or wetland vegetation was observed within the swales. No action is necessary regarding wetlands and other waters of the U.S." Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: CDNS Environmental Planner estimates based on on-site and aerial observations that the active black-tailed prairie dog colony spans 3.2 acres as of 17 APR 2018. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Moving forward in the development review process the CDNS Environmental Planner will work closely with the Developer and third-party ecological consultant regarding black tailed prairie dogs at the proposed project site as City Code and Land Use Code require prairie dog removal prior to any site construction work. The prairie dogs should not be removed or disturbed between March 1 through May 31 to avoid birthing, nursing and early rearing of pups. Page 2 of 14 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: A document explaining prairie dog removal and mitigation options will be provided at staff review 4/18/2018. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Draft and send a prairie dog removal plan for the CDNS Environmental Planner to review prior to next round of review (submit at least ten days prior to next round of review). Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Should this project achieve approval and proceed to construction, a burrowing owl survey, in accordance with Colorado Parks and Wildlife standards shall be provided prior to any prairie dog removal and prior to issuance of Development Construction Permit (DCP). The survey must be completed by a qualified wildlife biologist. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Should this project achieve approval and proceed to construction, documentation needs to be provided prior to issuance of DCP (at least one week prior to DCP meeting is ideal) regarding the burrowing owl survey and the relocation of black tailed prairie dogs. Documentation should be in the form of a signed letter or memo from the wildlife biologist for the survey, and from the contractor(s) for the relocation (date, time, methods). Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Please include both Western Native Seed Company Foothills Native Grass seed mix common and scientific names in addition to the Xeriscape Wildflower Mix common and scientific names. Page 3 of 14 Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Good seeding notes. Please add in addition to the three seed notes listed. a. PREPARE SOIL AS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE FOR NATIVE SEED MIX SPECIES THROUGH AERATION AND ADDITION OF AMENDMENTS, THEN SEED IN TWO DIRECTIONS TO DISTRIBUTE SEED EVENLY OVER ENTIRE AREA. DRILL SEED ALL INDICATED AREAS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING OPERATIONS. b. IF CHANGES ARE TO BE MADE TO SEED MIX BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS THEN APPROVAL MUST BE PROVIDED BY CITY ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER. c. APPROPRIATE NATIVE SEEDING EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED (STANDARD TURF SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR AGRICULTURE EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE USED). d. DRILL SEED APPLICATION RECOMMENDED PER SPECIFIED APPLICATION RATE TO NO MORE THAN '/2 INCH DEPTH (OR APPROPRIATE DEPTH FOR SELECTED SPECIES). FOR BROADCAST SEEDING INSTEAD OF DRILL SEEDING METHOD DOUBLE SPECIFIED APPLICATION RATE. REFER TO NATIVE SEED MIX TABLE FOR SPECIES, PERCENTAGES AND APPLICATION RATES. e. PREPARE A WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN TO ENSURE THAT WEEDS ARE PROPERLY MANAGED BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER SEEDING ACTIVITIES. f. AFTER SEEDING THE AREA SHALL BE COVERED WITH CRIMPED STRAW, JUTE MESH, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE METHODS. g. WHERE NEEDED, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED UNTIL SEED IS ESTABLISHED. IF IRRIGATION IS USED, THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIONAL AT THE TIME OF SEEDING AND SHALL ENSURE 100% HEAD-TO-HEAD COVERAGE OVER ALL SEEDED AREAS. ALL METHODS AND REQUIREMENTS IN THE APPROVED IRRIGATION PLAN SHALL BE FOLLOWED. h. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR SEEDED AREA FOR PROPER IRRIGATION, EROSION CONTROL, GERMINATION AND RESEEDING AS NEEDED TO ESTABLISH COVER. i. THE APPROVED SEED MIX AREA IS INTENDED TO BE MAINTAINED IN A NATURAL LIKE LANDSCAPE AESTHETIC. IF AND WHEN MOWING OCCURS IN NATIVE GRASS SEED MIX AREAS DO NOT MOW LOWER THAN 6 TO 8 INCHES IN HEIGHT TO AVOID INHIBITING NATIVE PLANT GROWTH. j. NATIVE SEED AREA WILL BE CONSIDERED ESTABLISHED WHEN S�VENTY PERCENT VEGETATIVE COVER IS REACHED WITH NO LARGER THAN ONE FOOT SQUARE BARE SPOTS AND/OR UNTIL DEEMED ESTABLISHED BY CITY PLANNING SERVICES AND EROSION CONTROL. k. THE DEVELOPER AND/OR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATE SEEDLING COVERAGE AND GROWTH AT THE TIME OF FINAL STABILIZATION, AS DEFINED BY STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES. IF FINAL STABILIZATION IS NOT ACHIEVED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE AGENCY, THE DEVELOPER AND/OR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADDITIONAL CORRECTIVE MEASURES TO SATISFY FINAL VEGETATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSEOUT. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Include more evergreen shrubs and trees for further screening and more native shrub clusters. Refer to the Fort Collins Native Plants document available online and published by the City of Fort Collins Natural Areas Department for guidance on native plants: http://www.fcgov.com/naturalareas/pdf/nativeplants2013.pdf. Also see the City of Fort Collins Plant List https://www.fcgov.com/forestry/plant_list.pdf. Page 4 of 14 Comment Number: 11 04/17/2018: Thank you for including mostly warm white 3000K or less for light fixtures and explaining availability issues with canopy lighting. Department: Internal Services Contact: Jonathon Nagel, , jnaqel(c�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 04/06/2018: Comment Number: 2 1. Prior to hearing, the following information must be provided with the project plans for review and approval: a. Trash and recycling enclosure details are required and must be incorporated into the project plan set. Trash enclosure details must show each trash and recycling enclosures proposed, in plan view and elevation view. Enclosure elevations must be provided for all exterior sides of enclosures. b. Trash enclosure plan and elevation details must be drawn separately from the site plan, at a scale that is sufficient to provide clear and complete information that is easily understandable as a reference document for the public hearing. Typically a separate plan detail and elevation detail at an enlarged architectural scale is necessary to provide sufficient information and to emphasize the design intent and requirements prominently in the plans. It is recommended that these details be grouped together in the planning set along with other site details. c. Plan details shall include direct labeling, dimensions and notations that illustrate sufficient access, circulation and function of the enclosures for both residents/employees and service providers. Plan details shall label and dimension the overall enclosure area, widths of service gates, size of interior circulation areas to be provided for interior access, required pedestrian entrance, overall size of all proposed trash and recycling containers and their capacity. d. Elevations and plan details shall graphically show materials and textures, and directly label all design components and shall clarify all materials, patterns, colors, textures and general specifications as well as all functional components such as drains, bollards, curbs and ramps. Elevations shall also describe wall and door construction including recessed and projected material patterns, base and top treatments and other design features. Include labeling, detail enlargements and cross sections if needed to adequately describe the depth of materials and construction intent. 2. Prior to final plan approval, additional plan, elevation and capacity information may be required with Final Plan review to clarify the adequate function, construction and final design intent of the trash and recycling areas. Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 Comment Originated: 04/06/2018 Comment Originated: 04/06/2018 04/06/2018: The Community Recycling Ordinance (No. 109 2016) requires that all new business and multifamily complexes subscribe to recycling service that is at minimum 1/3 of their overall service capacity(total bin capacity x number of weekly pickups, include both trash and recycling when calculating overall service capacity). In general recycling containers must be at least 50% the size of proposed trash containers to meet this requirement. Please make sure proposed containers meet this requirement and that adequate space is provided in all enclosures for recycling, used cooking oil collection and other services the enclosure will be used for. Page 5 of 14 Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/06/2018 t 04/06/2018: Land Use Code 3.2.5 requires that all trash and recycling enclosures provide a pedestrian entrance that is separate from the main service gates. Consider using a door-less pedestrian entrance which will provide safer and more efficient access for employees. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/06/2018 04/06/2018: What are the two rectangular containers proposed on the North side of the trash/recycling enclosure? Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/06/2018 04/06/2018: Please provide a label on the site plan for "Trash 8� Recycling Enclosure" Department: Light And Power Contact: Luke Unruh, 9704162724, lunruh(a�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/12/2018 04/12/2018: Light 8� Power does not have electric facilities in this area. Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish(c�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Light 8 Power reserves the right to provide electric service to this facility at such time as power is available. Possibly in the next 2-3 years. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Tim Tuttle, , TTUTTLE(a�fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: 1. CDOT has reviewed the Delich � Associates traffic study dated February 2018 and has no objections to the study. CDOT agrees with the assessments found in the summary & in figure 12 that both a left turn deceleration lane for southwest traffic and a right turn deceleration lane for northeast traffic are warranted. A new access permit will be required for the Loaf n Jug for the access point onto the frontage road. CDOT will require both of those auxiliary lanes be constructed at this time. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: 2. Region 4's materials engineering review for developer projects has increased to a higher level in 2018. It would be wise for the developer to have a prescoping conversation with CDOT once this project is accepted by the City. It would also be wise for the applicant to coordinate any design geotechnical work earlier in the process to mitigate slightly the longer Region 4 materials review time. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: 3. Regarding the right-of-way request, the standard request for this road is 75' from Centerline. In this specific circumstance though with multiple turn lanes being constructed on the east side of the frontage road, the request changes to "75' from centerline or enough to construct the new lanes in CDOT right-of-way and maintain at least a 15' swath for maintenance & drainage activities outside of the pavement. Page 6 of 14 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: 4. Depending on the timeline of this development, there is a possibility that these construction activities may occur at the same time as neighboring I-25 Design Build activities. Please pass along that CDOT's I-25 Design Build activities & traffic control will take precedence over any 3rd party activities. CDOT reserves the right to require adjustmenYs to the developer's construction schedule to more closely sync with our I-25 project. This coordination will happen before the preconstruction meeting for the auxiliary lanes. If you have any questions after reading this e-mail and the e-mail below, please don't hesitate to call. Thanks, Tim 970-350-2163 Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler(a�poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: FIRE CONTAINMENT vs. FIRE SPRINKLER > IFC 903.2.7: Per local amendment to the fire code, the proposed building exceeds 5,000 square feet and shall be sprinklered or fire contained. If containment is used, the containment construction shall be reviewed and approved by the Poudre Fire Authority prior to installation. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: FIRE LANE SPECIFICATIONS - PLEASE READ A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the following general requirements: > Shall be dedicated as an Emergency Access Easement and clearly detailed on the plans. > Maintain the required 20 foot minimum unobstructed width & 14 foot minimum overhead clearance. Where drive aisle widths exceed 20' in width, the full width shall be dedicated unless otherwise approved by the AHJ. > Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface capable of supporting 40 tons. > Dead-end fire access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. > The required turning radii of a fire apparatus access road shall be a minimum of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside. Turning radii shall be detailed on submitted plans. > Be visible by red curb and/or signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. Sign locations or red curbing should be detailed on the plans. Refer to LCUASS detail #1418 &#1419 for sign type, placement, and spacing. Appropriate directional arrows required on all signs. LCUASS detail #1418 should be added to plans. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: HYDRANT LOCATION Please relocate the hydrant further to the northeast so as to increase the separation distance between the hydrant and fuel dispensing area. Moving the hydrant 50 feet to the northeast would maintain 150' of distance separation to the fuel area while simultaneously remaining within 300' of the building. Page 7 of 14 Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION A plan for address posting on the building and/or canopy shall be provided with FDP submittal. Please keep in mind that address posting will be required on multiple sides of the building per local code and address numeral height shall conform with local amendments. Refer to IFC 505.1, 505.1.8, and Table 505.1.3 for further details. Comment Number: 5 04/17/2018: COMMERCIAL KITCHEN HOODS Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 > IFC 609.2: A Type I hood shall be installed at or above all commercial cooking appliances and domestic cooking appliances used for commercial purposes that produce grease vapors. Department: Planning Services Contact: Pete Wray, 970-221-6754, pwray(a�fcqov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: EL1. For W, E, N elevations either show brick or stone to top of wall or architectural grade metal panels, not stucco or aluminum siding for upper wall panel. The south elevation is determined to not be visible from the public street. Show dimensions on all elevations. Need materials/color legend. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Extend stone to top of gas canopy typ. for all columns. Add dimensions on all elevations. Match eve siding materials to main building (Arch. metal panels) Topic: General Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: This project is located within the I-25 CAC Overlay, with specific design standards adopted by the City of Fort Collins and Town of Windsor. See LUC Section 3.9.12 for building design standards and all free standing signs shall be ground signs limited to 14' max. in height along and perpendicular to I-25 and 12' along and perpendicular to other streets, measured from grade on property. Such ground signs will meet all other requirements in Section 3.8.7. While project signs are not part of the PDP review process, to clarify staff will not support the proposed free-standing pole sign. The CAC overlay area represents an important gateway for both jurisdictions and all signs need to comply with LUC requirements for signs. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/19/2018 04/19/2018: Based on extent of staff comments, another round of review is needed (two weeks). the Planning and Zoning Board packet for the June 21 meeting is due on June 6. As soon as you complete revised plans coordinate with the DRC staff to schedule submittal for PDP R2. Submittal appointment is preferred either May 2 or 9. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Sheet L1.0: Move planting details to last sheet L1.3. Move planting legend to L1.1 and 1.2. Expand planting notes on front page. Page 8 of 14 � Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Sheet L1.2. Add shade trees (see redline). Add building foundation planting on west (back) of building. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17l2018: LUC Section 3.9.4 (B): Site perimeter landscaping abutting I-25 ROW include 80' of screen plantings (trees) along east perimeter between paving and CDOT ROW. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Sheet 1: Add Planning approval signature block. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Sheet 3:Add site plan notes (see word file). Show ROW line along streets. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: The Frontage road sidewalk needs to comply with streetscape standards for detached walk for entire length to entrance. Adjust street trees along this frontage and other plantings accordingly if a variance is not used. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmoqen(c�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: The runoff and detention calculations were not completed using Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria. Please see redlined drainage report and update. Please let me know if there are any questions about the appropriate equations, rainfall, or other information to be used. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: The detention pond outfall rate can be the 2-year historic outfall as it appears the portion of this site that once drained to Fossil Creek is cut off by the frontage road. Please note that this release rate will be reduced by the runoff from any undetained basins on the site, i.e. Basins A4 and A5. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: It appears that the Low Impact Development requirements are being met for water quality (77.6°/o of impervious area is treated); however, it does not appear that standard water quality is provided for 100% of the site as required. How will water quality/detention be provided for the basins that do not drain to the detention pond? Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: It does not appear that the spill containment structure is currently located to intercept all spill locations. Please see redlines and review/revise. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Please note Standard Operating Procedures for the spill containment will be required prior to final plan approval for inclusion in the development agreement (DA). Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: The existing drainage swales surrounding this site do not currently meet City standards for burying riprap. It is expected that the areas where these swales are being disturbed will be updated to meet City standards including burying or replacing the riprap with alternative means of permanent erosion control. Page 9 of 14 Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: There seems to be a hybrid sand filter/rain garden design. If the intention is to landscape this area, a rain garden (aka bioretention) is recommended as it is more conducive to vegetation. Please contact me if you would like to discuss. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: The landscape plan legend needs to be updated to show the hatching used in the plans. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/16l2018 04/16/2018: Please see redlined utility plans and drainage report (PDF). Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam(a�fcqov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/09/2018 04/09/2018: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft. and therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted. The erosion control requirements can be located in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. a copy of the erosion control requirements can be found at www.fcgov.com/eroison. The Erosion Control Materials will need to be submitted at time of the first round of FDP. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Report as the recently received materials has comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Plans as the recently received materials have comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please submit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation as none was included in the recently received materials and is required to be submitted to meet City Criteria. Based upon the area of disturbance, State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre and should be pulled before Construction Activities begin. If you need clarification concerning the Erosion Control Material Requirements or Comments presented above please contact myself. Jesse Schlam (970) 224-6015 jschlam@fcgov.com Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountvCa�fcaov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Please revise the sub-title as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines. Page 10 of 14 Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 • 04/16/2018: Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED = NAVD88 - X.XX�. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Please make sure the titles on sheet 1 match. See redlines. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Please revise the sub-title as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: The legal description is not necessary. The sub-title serves as the legal description. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: The Basis Of Bearings statement is not necessary. Please remove unless another department asked to have it added. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: The Benchmark Statement is not necessary. Please remove unless another department asked to have it added. Page 11 of 14 Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement � in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: " PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED = NAVD88 - X.XX'. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Tim Tuttle, , TTUTTLE(a�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Work with engineering on required frontage improvements along the frontage road. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Contact CDOT for signing and striping requirements. Redlines will be provided at the Staff Review meeting. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson�fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: A landscape plan shall contain accurate and identifiable hydrozones, including a water budget chart that shows the total annual water use, which shall not exceed fifteen (15) gallons per square foot over the site. If you have questions contact Eric Olson at eolson@fcgov.com or 970-221-6704. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/16/2018 04/16/2018: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Zoning Contact: Missy Nelson, , mnelson(a�fcqov.com Topic: General Page 12 of 14 Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: LUC 3.2.2(C)(5)(a) Drive aisles leading to main entrances shall have walkways on both sides of the drive aisle. Please confirm with planner that a modification for this standard would be supported. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: The new sidewalks will need to be detached with street trees in the parkway. Please revise plans. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: LUC 3.2.2(E)(5) Six percent of the interior space of all parking lots with less than 100 spaces is required to be landscaped. These calculations also need to be shown on the landscape plan. The canopy area can be removed from this calculation. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: LUC 3.2.2(E)(5)(a-fl Parking lot interior landscaping — No more than 15 spaces without an intervening tree, landscape island or landscape peninsula. Trees should be added to existing south end parking peninsula, new peninsula and north end of parking spaces. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: LUC 3.2.2(E)(4)(a) Parking lot perimeter landscaping should have 1 tree per 25 linear feet along a public street and 1 tree per 40 linear feet otherwise. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Please add accessible access from sidewalk on south side of lot (adjacent to south side parking area) Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Landscape plans are incorrectly labeled Utility Plans in the title block, please revise. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Landscape plan key is missing the hatch mark designations. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Please provide drive aisle and parking stall dimensions on site plan. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: LUC 3.2.2(C)(4). Bicycle parking should be labeled on site plan, detail of bike rack included (at final plan is ok). Where is the location of the required 1 covered bicycle parking space? Also, it looks like the bikes would extend into the walkway, please move further back or confirm that they will not block walk. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: LUC 3.5.1 (I) (6) All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view from both above and below by integrating it into building and roof design to the maximum extent feasible. In addition, conduit, meters, vents and other equipment attached to the building or protruding from the roof shall be painted to match surrounding building surfaces. It looks like you've planned screening on the roof and perhaps ground location on the side of the building. Please note locations of equipment on site plan and the above note about painting to match on elevations. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: LUC 3.2.2(K) Minimum required parking is 25 spaces. 12,308 / 1000 * 2= 24.62 � 25. Once you add a parking peninsula you will need a location for the additional parking space. Page 13 of 14 Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: LUC3.2.4 One of the lights is 4K temperature; is it possible to stay consistent with the others and have 3000K? Also, 1 fixture looks like there's no housing selected? Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: LUC 3.2.5 Accessible trash and recycling enclosures should have both service and pedestrian access. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 04/17/2018 04/17/2018: Signage will not be reviewed during development. Please remove all signage from all plans. Also please note, a modification request for a taller site sign than allowed per LUC 3.8.7.1 will not be supported. Page 14 of 14