HomeMy WebLinkAboutWEST VINE STORAGE - PDP - PDP170016 - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS (3)•
Gity Of
Fort Ca�lins
—.�
C J
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134-fax
fcgov. com/de ve/opmentrevie w
March 30, 2018
Ric Hattman
Hattman Associates
524 S. Loomis Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80521
RE: West Vine Storage, PDP170016, Round Number 3
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about
any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com.
Comment SummarV:
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mraqasa@fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 10
03/26/2018:
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: Will need a follow-up with Construction Inspection Manager on the
revised design.
It is not clear if this is an internal City matter or you want to discuss with our Construction Team.
10/25/2017: The street patching information shows three street cuts within a 75
foot distance which would require an expanded street cut to encompass all
three cuts. In general the patching shown on the plans cannot be solidified at
this time, pending more design information on how the proposal implements the
commercial local standard and how the patching then aligns with parking,
bikelanes and/or travel lanes.
The spacing of street cuts has been changed to have fewer cuts and the cuts more continous in area. This
was addressed p�ev�cusly.
05/23/2017: The services (sanitary and water) that serve the 2 story apartment
building need to run perpendicular to the street. Depending on the ROW
requirements along Vine Drive, the services may need to move further north so
they are not ru�g parallel in the public ROW. •
This was addresses previously. Services are perper�dlcular io th� s°ree?.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: The plat depicts "emergency vehicle" instead of "emergency
access". .
The Plat has been revised to reflect 'Emergency Access Easement.'
10/25/2017: The plat's depiction of a"storm drainage" easement should be
changed to "drainage easement". Likewise, the "emergency vehicle access"
should be changed to "emergency access".
The easement has been renamed � Drainage and Natural Habitat Zone Easement on the request of other
City Departments.
05/23/2017: All detention ponds and LID need to be within a Drainage
Easement. Also, Emergency Access routes will need to be within an
Emergency Access Easement.
All detention and LID areas are t�u�tn n dedicated easements. All emergency routes are within easements.
Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 10/25/2017
10/25/2017: Additional comments may be provided upon getting additional
design information addressed.
Comment addressed previously
Comment Number: 29
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
The widening doesn't appear to depict proposed cross slopes for the
additional, only reflecting existing cross slopes, it appears these are not
necessarily the same -- please provide proposed cross slope grades. Also,
note that the patching shown on the cross slopes would need to encompass the
entire bikelane, however the patching shown on C2.0 is generally wider than the
bikelane.
Cross slopes that meet current City requirements for the new work are provided.
The areas of the attached parking areas and bike lane are fully new pavement and are not patch sections.
Comment Number: 30
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
03/26/2018: The flowline grades depict maintaining a.5% minimum, but the
cross slopes exceed requirements. This design will be discussed further on
Thursday and will need a variance request.
Flowline grades have been revised to have cross slopes within City Standards.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 10/25/2017
03/26/2018: This doesn't appear to have been addressed.
The Flat has been revised to provide for the redlines provided by the Staff.
10/25/2017: The plat should have a full City Engineer signature block.
The Plat will contain. a full City Engineering Signature B!�ck.
2
•
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcqov.com
Topic: General
•
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
03/26/2018: FOR FINAL PLAN: Please label the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone
on the landscape plan, grading and drainage plan (C3.0, C3.1, C3.2), erosion
control plan (C4.0), and utilities plan (C5.0). Please ensure the habitat note is
on each of these plans as well.
Tne buffer Zone and the "�aE�itat note hds b�en aaded fo thp plans noted.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Molly Roche, , mroche@fcqov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number:
10/23/2017:
Comment Originated: 05/26/2017
Thank you for including the City Street Tree Notes and Street Tree Permit Note.
On sheet SP3.4, please change the title of "NOTE" to STREET TREE NOTE.
Please contact Molly Roche (mroche@fcgov.com) to obtain the most recent
version of the General Landscape Notes and Tree Protection notes, which are
also to be incfuded on the landscape plans. Please omit the Landscape
Specifications notes on sheet SP 3.2 and use the City of Fort Collins General
Landscape Notes in their place.
05/26/2017:
Please use the City of Fort Collins General Landscape Notes, Street Tree
Notes, Permit Note, and Tree Protection Notes on the landscape plans, which
are available through the City Forester.
Note on Sheet SP 3.4 has been changed. Tree Protection note has been added tc °he �andscape Piar.
�urrent General Landscape Notes have been added to Sheet SP 3.2.
Comment Number: 3
3/26/2018:
Continued:
Comment Originated: 05/26/2017
Is it possible to transplant the tree near the two existing conifers (Engleman
Spruce and Ponderosa Pine)? If not, then City Forestry will explore possibilities
of transplanting the Colorado Blue Spruce off-site. Will advise with final
decision.
The Owner has contacted severai tr�e mov+ng ccmpanies and none of them want to move it. The size oi
detention ponds limits the ability to place another tree at the north end of the Site w�thout interfering with
detention Th� C+ty �s welcome t� it �f they can move it.
10/23/2017:
Continued:
05/26/2017:
- At the onsite meeting, evaluation of the feasibility of transplanting the spruce
closes to Vine can be determined.
- It also appears grading may impact two evergreens in the detention pond.
- Existing spruc�ong Shields appears to be further to the w� Please adjust
this on the landscape plans.
Spruce tree at south end of site is discussed above. Grading around the two evergreen trees at the north
end of the site has been accomplished to keep these trees out of the detention pond. Location of the
spruce tree along Shields has been evaluated and repositioned.
Comment Number: 5
3/26/2018:
Continued:
Comment Originated: 05/26/2017
Thank you for providing proper tree-utility separation throughout the site. There
is a gas line that runs through the right-of-way that is of concern to the street
trees. I contacted Marc Virata in Engineering to clarify if this gas line is
proposed or existing as well as the tree separation distance required.
We discussed this at the meeting with you and Marc and decided that the trees and gas line can coexist
As shown.
10/23/2017:
Continued:
05/26/2017:
Review locations of water and sewer service lines and provide at least 6�
separation between trees. Please clearly label the utilities on the landscape
plans.
This was �reviousiy provided.
Comment Number: 6
3/26/2018:
Continued:
Comment Originated: 05/26/2017
Please show irrigated turf in the right-of-way with a distinct symbol on the
landscape plan sheet SP 3.1. Identifying irrigated turf with a unique symbol,
such as the hatch on SP 3.3, is helpful to show on the landscape plans.
Hatching has been added to the areas of irrigated sod on Sheet SP 3.1 within the R.O.W.
10/23/2017:
Please show irrigated turf in the right-of-way with a distinct symbol.
Provided.
5/26/2017:
Please clarify where irrigated turf is to be used on the project. The current
symbol is difficult to see. Please note that irrigated turf must be used in the
right-of-way.
Provided.
Comment Number: 7
3/26/2018:
Comment Originated: 05/26/2017
Continued:
Thank you for using Kentucky Coffeetree in place of Honeylocust and making
several changes.
4
City Forestry doe�ot advise planting Black Walnut because t�are
susceptible to Thousand Cankers Disease. Most Black Walnut trees in the area
are in rapid decline from this disease. Please plant additional Catalpa or
incorporate Accolade Elm in place of the Black Walnuts.
The Black Walnut trees have been removed from the design. I had one in my yard that died this year.
Please indicate Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn (Crategus crusgalli `Inermis') in
the plant schedule.
T�i��e schedule ,hGs beer� ��ev�s����; ���s r�:�`ec.
10/23/2017:
All comments from 5/26/2017 still apply in regards to species selection. City
Forestry would like the applicant to consider the use of Kentucky Coffeetree
°�Espresso" in place of the proposed Honeylocust on the project. We are
reaching a maximum species diversity of Honeylocust in Fort Collins and would
like to begin incorporating alternative species in their place.
This change has been made. The remauning Honeylocust are all existing.
05/26/2017:
Tree Selection
- Please replace American Linden with Kentucky Coffeetree or Catalpa.
- Amur Chokecherry has poor survivability in Fort Collins. City Forestry has
experienced early decline and sun scalding that usually results with premature
removal/replacement. Forestry recommends using Gamble Oak in the dryland
detention area and possibly Red Barron Crabapple for the two Chokecherry
close to the Gas-O-Mat.
- The conifers shown between the walk on Vine are close to the proposed street
trees. This area will be heavily shaded as the street trees grow and mature.
- Forestry recommends changing Limber Pine to either Rocky Mountain Juniper
or Blue Spruce.
- The two proposed pinyon pines and limber pines in the section along Shields
on the west side of the building will not thrive due to heavy shading overtime as
canopy shade trees mature. Please evaluate changing to a more shade tolerant
species, such as Colorado Blue Spruce, and adding a couple more trees in this
area.
These char;ges have been incarpora?e�u into the P?�r�s.
Comment Number: 9
3/26/2018:
Continued:
Comment Originated: 10/23/2017
The symbols are still a little unclear. To clarify which trees are existing on the
landscape plans (sheet SP3.1), please say "EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN"
followed by the species abbreviation. Omit displaying mitigation values for
these existing trees as they will not require any mitigation. In the landscape
schedule, please do not include existing trees because it might confuse the
landscape contractor about the number of trees they are to purchase/plant
on-site. Becaus�iu show the existing trees to remain on S�in the tree
inventory table, this information is already provided and does not need to be
shown in the plant schedule.
These changes have been incorporated into the various landscape pages.
10/23/2017:
Please use a distinct symbol for existing trees on-site and trees to remain. This
symbol should differ from new plantings. City Forestry suggests using a lighter
shade for the symbol to increase distinction between existing and proposed
landscaping.
A new symbal is used for existing trees to remain on the Landscape Plan.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 10/23/2017
3/26/2018:
Continued:
Thank you for showing mitigation trees with a M. However, I oniy counted 22
mitigation trees. There is one existing tree labeled as mitigation tree, but
unfortunately, this will not count towards your total required mitigation number.
Please add one more mitigation tree to the plan and update the landscape
schedule accordingly.
This change has been made.
10/23/2017:
In place of "X" and for additional clarity, please label all mitigation trees with a
bolded and capitalized "M" on both the landscape plans and landscape
schedule.
These changes have been made.
Comment Number: 11
3/26/2018:
Comment Originated: 10/23/2017
Continued:
Thank you for providing the Minimum Species Diversity percentages in the
landscape schedule. Please remove existing trees from the landscape
schedule as they should not be included in the new species diversity. In
addition, please provide the total plant count for each category. For example,
there are 24 deciduous trees, 23 ornamental trees, and 23 coniferous. The
species percentage should derive from the total number of trees (70 trees).
Since there are greater than 60 trees on-site, no more than 15% of one species
shall be planted. Please adjust the species diversity so that calculation uses the
total number of trees on-site (70). For example, there are 5 Kentucky Coffeetree
proposed out of 70 total trees. The diversity percentage for Kentucky Coffeetree
equals � 7%.
These revisions have been made.
10/23/2017:
Please include Minimum Species Diversity percentages in the landscape
schedule. See Land Use Code 3.2.1.
Provided.
�
Comment Num� 12
3/26/2018:
�mment Originated: 03/26/2018
Please show the full inventory and mitigation table (that is shown on SP3.4) on
sheet SP2.3 as well.
Table is now �r?serted on �-o�h pages.
Comment Number: 13
3/26/2018:
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
The street tree placement along Vine appears to be less than 30 feet in some
areas. The required distance between street trees is 30-40 feet. Please adjust
spacing to meet. In addition, the Cottonwoods are spaced at 20 feet. These are
very large maturing shade trees that should be spaced, at minimum, 30 feet
apart to allow for proper growth.
Alignment of trees has been provided.
Comment Number: 14
3/26/2018:
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
Please show all City of Fort Collins landscape notes on one sheet. In addition,
please show the City Street Tree Permit note on all landscape sheets to
emphasize importance. This note is available from City Forestry.
These changes have been made.
Comment Number: 15
03/26/2018:
3/26/2016:
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
There appears to be one extra Syringa Reticulata on the landscape plans. Only
4 are specified in the plant schedule. Please correct.
T��is has been cor�ect�d.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tsieqmund@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 05/25/2017
05/25/2017: Light and Power has electric facilities along the south side of Vine
Dr. that, with modifications to our primary system, can be utilized to provide
power to the site. Modifications will include trenching or boring new primary line
under Vine Dr and installing a new vault. Light and Power also has conduit
stubbed along the east side of Shields St, adjacent to the site that could be
utilized to provide power into the site. Further discussions are necessary to
determine where the power feed into the site will come from.
Source or p��ver. �ew ��ault, ar� ne�nt transfor��mer are shown on trre site.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 05/25/2017
05/25/2017: Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges
and any system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this
development. Please contact me or visit the following website for an estimate
of charges and fees:
�
http://www.fcgo�m/utilities/business/builders-and-develope�lant-investmen
t-development-fees
Urderstoou.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 05/25/2017
05/25/2017: Transformer locations will need to be coordinated with Light &
Power. Transformer must be placed within 10 ft of a drivable surface for
installation and maintenance purposes. The transformer must also have a front
clearance of 10 ft and side/rear clearance of 3 ft minimum.
Location on plans meets these standards.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017
05/25/2017: A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one line
diagram for the commercial meter will need to be completed and submitted to
Light & Power Engineering. A link to the C-1 form is below:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-
forms-guidelines-regulations
Understood.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017
05/25/2017: Electric meter locations will need to be coordinated with Light and
Power. Please show proposed meter locations on the utility and site plans.
Meter locations are shown on the plans.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 05/25/2017
05/25/2017: Please contact Tyler Siegmund at Light & Power Engineering if
you have any questions at 970.416.2772. Please reference our policies,
construction practices, development charge processes, and use our fee
estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers
Understood.
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Mark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtaylor@fcgov.com
Topic: Drainage Report
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 10/23/2017
03/26/2018: Repeat Comment. An agreement still needs to be finalized before
storm drainage outfall is allowed into the ditch. The ditch company will not
proceed with agreement preparation or review until all permit application fees
have been paid.
�Jndersiood.
10/23/2017: An Discharge Agreement between the owner and the Arthur
Irrigation Company will be required before storm water can be discharged into
the irrigation ditch. Please contact Rosanna Harris, 730 Ash Mesa Road,
Delta, Colorado 81416; rosannharris@gmail.com; 1.970.874.0189 to start
working on the agreement. This agreement must be in place before any work
can begin on the project.
Ini#ial fee has been paid and Owners are waiting for agreement from the Ditch Company.
0
�
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2
•
Comment Originated: 10/23/2017
03/26/2018: Repeat Comment. Their have been problems in the past with
unauthorized requests for work being charged to the ditch company, so the
attorney will not proceed with out notification from the ditch company. If the
applicant is having problems, they can call the ditch company president at
970.416.2494 and ask him to call the attorney and instruct him to proceed.
„'� �� � r �'.0,� �
10/23/2017: An easement granted to Arthur Irrigation Company from the
property owner will be required before plan approval. Please contact the Arthur
attorney, Brent Bartlett (Fisher Brown Bartlett & Gunn), 1319 E Prospect Road,
Fort Collins, Colorado 80525; 970.407.9000 to begin the easement process.
We were told to not contact him and he would get back with us then the time was right.
Department: PFA
Contact: Andrew Rosen, , arosen@fcqov.com
Comment Number: 1
UPDATE 3-26-2018
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
Fire Lane sign placement appears to be appropriate as denoted on the
Emergency Service Plan dated 2-20-18. PFA may request additional signs or
change of placement at time of Final Inspection
;;nderstood.
05/23/2017: FIRE LANES
Fire access is required to within 150' of all exterior portions of any building, or
facility as measured by an approved route around the building perimeter. For
the purposes of this section, fire access cannot be measured from an arterial
road (Shields) and a fire lane will be required on the property. Any fire lane on
private property shall be dedicated as an Emergency Access Easement (EAE)
and be labeled as such on future plans.
The existing hammerhead easement currently indicated for the cell tower is not
labeled as an Emergency Access Easement. Dedication of an EAE for cell
tower access was required to be dedicated in conjunction with construction of
the cell tower. As it relates to the overall site plan, this easement does not
provide access to the entire site as defined by code. An Emergency Access
Easement will need to be updates so as to serve the entire facility and be
dedicated with the replat. Code language provided below.
> IFC 503.1.1: Approved fire Lanes shall be provided for every facility, building
or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the
jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements
of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and
all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by
an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. When any
portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the
building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access, the fire code
official is authorized to increase the dimension if the building is equipped
throughout with an approved, automatic fire-sprinkler system.
Easements hav�e�� cor����te�� c��� ��-f��e ��I�rs a���d tne Plat. A�s to ail pcants o� e�very builclir��g is sho��rr�
the Emergency P1an. All areas are w�tnin the 150 foot iimit.
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepardQfcgov.com
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 03/30/2018
03/30/2018: In order to be scheduled for an Administrative Hearing, a Letter of
Intent is needed from the Arthur Irrigation Company.
Provided.
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 03/30/2018
03/30/2018: After obtaining a street light layout from Light and Power, be sure
that shade trees are kept at least 40 feet from such lights but in order to not
have an 80-foot gap, ornamental trees may be placed to within 15-feet of street
lights.
Proper spacing for trees verse street lights is provided without large gaps in tree spacing.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmoqen@fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: I understand that the ditch company has been less responsive than
desirable; however, this letter of intent still must be provided prior to hearing and
completed agreement prior to final plan approval.
Understood.
10/27/2017: Comment still applies. Please provide letter of intent prior to
hearing and agreement prior to final plan approval.
Understood.
05/23/2017: An agreement is required in order to have this site outfall to
Arthur's Ditch. Please contact Mark Taylor at 970-416-2494 to coordinate.
Understood.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: Repeat comment. Nothing was seen in this submittal to address
this comment.
10/27/2017: It appears the eastern pond will be used to treat and detain these
flows. Please show sizing for these flows in the eastern pond. It appears flow
from other areas will be treated by rain gardens prior to entering either
detention pond; therefore, it is not required to provide water quality for this runoff
as it will be treated by the rain gardens.
05/23/2017: It is required that half of the street frontage be brought into the site
as it has historically flowed. This flow needs to be both detained and treated for
water quality. LID treatment is not required.
These issues have all been addressed in the ne�v submission.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
10
�
03/26/2018: Clarl9'}�ation is needed to understand what is bein�oposed.
The plans show 3 rain gardens; however, sizing calculations are onty shown for
2 rain gardens. Please help me understand what is being proposed; I'm happy
to discuss the intent with you and explain what I'm looking for.
The additional calculations are provided with this submission.
10/27/2017: Sizing calculations were not seen. Please provide sizing
calculations for the rain gardens to show that adequate space has been
provided for the rain garden footprint.
Provided with thls submission.
05/23/2017: Please provide sizing calculations for the proposed rain gardens
and show that Low Impact Development requirements for the site are being
met.
provb�ed tiruith this wcrk.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: Repeat comment. These issues were not clarified in this
submittal.
10/27/2017: Please see redlines regarding water quality calculations and
details in the drainage report.
05/23/2017: Please review the water quality calculations per the redlines. Do
the proposed detention basins have a permanent water surface?
Redlines have been addr?ssed. There is nc permanent water surface,
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: Repeat comment. This submittal did not address these questions.
10/27/2017: Please expand discussion of water quality and low impact
development requirements. It is noted that the majority of the site will be treated
with the proposed rain gardens and areas that are not treated by the rain
gardens will have extended detention water quality provided and sized in the
proposed detention basins. No discussion of off-site flows was seen. Please address.
Informatior� provided with this submission.
05/23/2017: Please update the drainage report to include thorough discussion
of the drainage design including, but not limited to:
- 4-step process
- Off-site flows
- Water quality and detention
- Low Impact Development (LID)
Report changes have been made.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: Repeat comment. I will look to see that the proposed easements
are sufficient once the rain gardens, detention ponds and ou�alis have been
clarified.
10/27/2017: I see that these have been shown and will look to see that they
cover the proposed areas in the updated plans next round.
05/23/2017: Please provide easements for the rain gardens, detention basins,
11
and outfalls. •
•
Detent9on p;;nas a�-�� ��a��� gardens ai�e all within the d�d�nage easements ��� rre �lars and the P:a:
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: Once again, although the response letter said compliance was
shown, it was not seen. Repeat comment.
10/27/2017: Although the response letter said compliance was shown, it was
not seen. Repeat comment.
05/23/2017: Please provide evidence that the detention basin is in compliance
with drain times per Colorado Revised Statute 37-92-602(8). More information
on this statute is available at http://tinyurl.com/RevisedStatuteMemo, and a
spreadsheet to show compliance is available for download at
http://tinyurl.com/ComplianceSpreadsheet. Please contact Dan Mogen at
(970)224-6192 or dmogen@fcgov.com with any questions about this
requirement or for assistance with the spreadsheet.
Compliance is showr. with this submissscn.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: Please see updated redlines provided via pdf.
10/27/2017: Please see updated redlines provided via pdf.
05/23/2017: Please see redlined plans (pdf) and report (hard copy).
Redlines have been addressed.
Comment Number: 12
03/26/2018: Comment still applies.
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
10/27/2017: Comment still applies.
05/23/2017: Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming upon
future submittals as additional details are discovered.
Understood.
Comment Number: 13
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
03/26/2018: Please contact me to discuss proposed landscaping for the rain
gardens prior to final plan. I would like to discuss what is proposed with the
goal of making these rain gardens as successful as possible.
We discussed and determined that we were on the same page as far as intent. The plantings
placed among a cobble surface to match the rain garden along Shields Street was determine to be the
right approach.
Comment Number: 14
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
03/26/2018: The majority of my comments and redlines from Rounds 1 and 2
reviews still have not been addressed. This submittal is largely a duplication of
what I received in October 2017 and has not been updated in many areas that
require updates. Overall, I consider this submittal to be incomplete as it has not
addressed comments and redlines that were previously provided.
All prior comments and redlines have been addressed with this submission.
12
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 9�18-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
❑
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/16/2018: Please resubmit an Erosion Control Plans as the recently received
materials have comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet
City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation
as the recently received materials has comments and redlines, that needed to
be addressed to meet City Criteria and as a result have changed the Erosion
Control Plans and would require a recalculation of the Escrow. If you need
clarification concerning the Erosion Control Material Requirements or
Comments presented above please contact myself. Jesse Schlam (970)
224-6015 jschlam @fcgov.com
10/16/2017: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft. and therefore Erosion
and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted. Current Erosion Control
Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. The erosion control
requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of
Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. a copy of the erosion control requirements
can be found at www.fcgov.com/eroison. The Erosion Control Materials will
need to be submitted at time of the first round of FDP. Please resubmit an
Erosion Control Plans as the recently received materials have comments and
redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an
Erosion Control Report as the recently received materials has comments and
redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an
Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation as the recently received materials
has comments and redlines, that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria
and as a result have changed the Erosion Control Plans and would require a
recalculation of the Escrow. Based upon the area of disturbance, State permits
for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre and should be
pulled before Construction Activities begin. If you need clarification concerning
the Erosion Control Material Requirements or Comments presented above
please contact myself. Jesse Schlam (970) 224-6015 jschlam@fcgov.com
05/23/2017: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft., therefore Erosion and
Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control
requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of
Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials
Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan
(Based upon returned redlines), an Erosion Control Report (based off of
Erosion Control Criteria), and an Escrow / Security Calculation. Also, based
upon the area of disturbance State permits for stormwater will be required since
the site is over an acre. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control
section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam
970-218-2932 or email @ Ischlam@fcgov.com
Comme�nts, concerns. �rd ��edlines are addresse� in ahe nevv submission.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 19
03/26/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Originated: 05/31/2017
13
10/26/2017: Th�ill be verified at FDP. �
05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Line over issues have been addressed.
Comment Number: 20
03/26/2018: There are spelling issues. See redlines.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/31/2017: There are spelling issues. See redlines.
Spelling issues have been addressed.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Originated: 05/31/2017
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017
03/26/2018: Please remove the address from the title blocks. With the project
being replatted, the address could change.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/31/2017: Please remove the address from the title. With the project being
replatted, the address could change.
Address has been removec frcm the plar.s
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017
03/26/2018: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet
titles on the noted sheets. See redlines.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/31/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet
titles on the noted sheets. See redlines.
Sheet titles and index have been coordinated.
Comment Number: 24
Comment Originated: 05/31/2017
03/26/2018: Please make changes to the Benchmark Statement as shown.
See redlines.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/31/2017: Please make changes to the Benchmark Statement as shown.
See redlines.
Benchmarks have been revised to match the Plat and to ones that are present today.
Comment Number: 25
Comment Originated: 05/31/2017
03/26/2018: The legal description is not necessary. The sub-title serves as the
legal description. If it is going to remain, it needs to be corrected.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/31/2017: The legal description is not necessary. The sub-title serves as the
legal description.
The legal is provided for the Owner and a request from their Bank.
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017
03/26/2018: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/31/2017: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets.
Bencnmarks have been revised.
14
Comment Num� 27
03/26/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Lin� over issu�s h�,;r r�ar ?�s�u�se�.
Topic: General
Comment Number: 18
�mment Originated: 05/31/2017
Comment Originated: 05/31/2017
03/26/2018: EMERGENCY SERVICE PLAN: There are line over text issues.
See redlines.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/31/2017: Emergency Service Plan: There are line over text issues. See
redlines.
L:n� over issues ave ��e�r� ad�r�ssea
Comment Number: 31
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
03/26/2018: EMERGENCY SERVICE PLAN: Some of the easement
descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they
should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat.
Easer�ents on plans anG P!at have been coordinated.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 11
03/26/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Redlines have been addressed
Topic: Plat
Comment Originated: 05/31/2017
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/30/2017
03/26/2018: We were aware of the passing of Mr. Lewis, and understand that
no revised Plat was submitted. We have included our redlines from the
10/25/17 review for the new Surveyor.
10/26/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you
disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections
were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in
response letter.
05/30/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you
disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections
were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in
response letter.
We have a new Surveyor on the project and he has addressed the prior and �urrEnt comments.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 05/30/2017
15
03/26/2018: So�of the sheet titles in the sheet index do no�atch the sheet
titles on the noted sheets. See redlines.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/30/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet
titles on the noted sheets. See redlines.
Sheet Titles and index have been coordinatetl.
Comment Number: 8
03/26/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP.
05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Redlunes have been addressed.
Comment Number: 28
Comment Originated: 05/31/2017
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
03/26/2018: Some of the boundary information, and right of way & easement
descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they
should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat.
Site documents and Plat have been coordinated.
Comment Number: 29
Comment Originated: 03/26/2018
03/26/2018: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched
areas. See redlines.
Issue has been addressed.
Comment Number: 30
03/26/2018: There are te� over text issues. See redlines.
Issue has been addressed.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcqov.com
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
Comment Originated: 03/2612018
10/20/2017: The frontage improvements shown don't seem to tie into the
roundabout approach. A bike lane is needed, which is funneled into a ramp
with striping that shows the bike lane ending. We're checking with our
engineering department to see if that approach had a concept design
completed that we can provide.
05/23/2017: The development will need frontage improvements along Vine
Drive including sidewalk.
These issues have been provided.
Contact: Tim Tuttle, , TTUTTLE@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/27/2018
03/27/2018: Signing and striping redlines will be provided at the staff review
meeting.
Signage a.nd striping plan provided.
16
�. � �
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcqov.com
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/22/2017
05/22/2017: A landscape plan shall contain accurate and identifiable
hydrozones, including a water budget chart that shows the total annual water
use, which shall not exceed fifteen (15) gallons per square foot over the site. If
you have questions contact Eric Olson at eolson@fcgov.com or 970-221-6704.
This has been provided.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 05/22/2017
05/22/2017: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building
permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section
3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation
requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson @fcgov.com
Understood.
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmogen@fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: Repeat comment - please show this on the utility plan. I see new
services to the "dwelling unit with home occupation." Please call out as such to
allow for one water and wastewater service to the building.
10/27/2017: I see new services to the "dwelling unit with home occupation."
Please call out as such to allow for one water and wastewater service to the
building.
Provided.
Please see redlines and clarify proposed services to both buildings including
providing adequate slope for the proposed sewer services, which is 2%
minimum for a 4" sanitary service.
Provided.
05/23/2017: It appears that the existing water and sewer services to the site will
be utilized to provide services to the proposed buildings and no new building
services are proposed.
New services are provided for the dweiling unitJhome occupation building. The existing sanitary
To the existing building is to remain. The water service to the existing building is to be new.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: Comment left active, no response required.
10/27/2017: Noted per response, this hydrant will be private. (This comment is
left active to transfer documentation to final plan - no response required.)
05/23/2017: The proposed fire hydrant, as currently shown, will be considered
private. A public hydrant would be considered if the hydrant is within 150' of the
roadway and access is provided via a curb cut with access drive.
17
' ,� ,
Ti'�2 "lyC�f�l�t �fl��' SPl"�i'�@ _li�-C �iC���C"1Fu c�.fc'C "J� ��I'i��t� �tl@8. �
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017
03/26/2018: Repeat comment. Once again, the majority of redlines have not
been addressed. Overall, I consider this submittal to be incomplete as it has
not addressed comments and redlines that were previously provided.
10/27/2017: The majority of redlines from round 1 were not addressed. Please
see updated redlines and provide response with next submittal. Please feel
free to contact me if you would like to discuss anything shown in the redlines.
05/23/2017: Please see redlined plans (pdf).
Redlines have been addressed.
Comment Number: 5
03/26/2018: Comment still applies.
Comment Originated: 05/24/2017
10/27/2017: Comment still applies.
05/23/2017: Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming upon
future submittals as additional details are discovered.
Understood.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Ryan Boehle, 970-416-2401, rboehle@fcqov.com
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/24/2017
03/28/18: A note needs to be added to the site plan explaining trash service.
05/23/2017: - How will the development handle refuse? Will a trash enclosure
be provided for this storage facility? If an enclosure is provided it will need to be
adequately sized and conveniently located. The enclosure will also need to have
a separate pedestrian access for ease of use as per 3.2.5.
10/24/2017 : I see the shaded area of a private trash area but I need an
elevation or a change to the site plan showing how the trash area will operate.
A trash gated trash area is provided for the residential unit on site. Typically no trash containers are
Provided for storage areas since people abuse them and try to dispose of doxic materials.
18