Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWEST VINE STORAGE - PDP - PDP170016 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS (3)• City of Fort Callins . � _ • Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134-fax fcgov. com/developmentreview March 30, 2018 Ric Hattman Hattman Associates 524 S. Loomis Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: West Vine Storage, PDP170016, Round Number 3 Please see the following summary of commen#s from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 ortshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summarv: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mraqasa@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: 03/26/2018: Will need a follow-up with Construction Inspection Manager on the revised design. 10/25/2017: The street patching information shows three street cuts within a 75 foot distance which would require an expanded street cut to encompass all three cuts. In general the patching shown on the plans cannot be solidified at this time, pending more design information on how the proposal implements the commercial local standard and how the patching then aligns with parking, bikelanes and/or travel lanes. 05/23/2017: The services (sanitary and water) that serve the 2 story apartment building need to run perpendicular to the street. Depending on the ROW requirements along Vine Drive, the services may need to move further north so they are not running parallel in the public ROW. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: The plat depicts "emergency vehicle" instead of "emergency access". • • 10/25/2017: The plat's depiction of a"storm drainage" easement should be changed to "drainage easement". Likewise, the "emergency vehicle access" should be changed to "emergency access". 05/23/2017: All detention ponds and LID need to be within a Drainage Easement. Also, Emergency Access routes will need to be within an Emergency Access Easement. Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 10/25/2017 10/25/2017: Additional comments may be provided upon getting additional design information addressed. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 The widening doesn't appear to depict proposed cross slopes for the additional, only reflecting existing cross slopes, it appears these are not necessarily the same -- please provide proposed cross slope grades. Also, note that the patching shown on the cross slopes would need to encompass the entire bikelane, however the patching shown on C2.0 is generally wider than the bikelane. Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 03/26/2018: The flowline grades depict maintaining a.5% minimum, but the cross slopes exceed requirements. This design will be discussed further on Thursday and will need a variance request. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 28 03/26/2018: This doesn't appear to have been addressed. Comment Originated: 10/25/2017 10/25/2017: The plat should have a full City Engineer signature block. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reveretteC�fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 03/26/2018: FOR FINAL PLAN: Please label the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone on the landscape plan, grading and drainage plan (C3.0, C3.1, C3.2), erosion control plan (C4.0), and utilities plan (C5.0). Please ensure the habitat note is on each of these plans as well. 2 Department: Forestry • Contact: Molly Roche, , mroche@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 10/23/2017: � Comment Originated: 05/26/2017 Thank you for including the City Street Tree Notes and Street Tree Permit Note. On sheet SP3.4, please change the title of "NOTE" to STREET TREE NOTE. Please contact Molly Roche (mroche@fcgov.com) to obtain the most recent version of the General Landscape Notes and Tree Protection notes, which are also to be included on the landscape plans. Please omit the Landscape Specifications notes on sheet SP 3.2 and use the City of Fort Collins General Landscape Notes in their place. 05/26/2017: Please use the City of Fort Collins General Landscape Notes, Street Tree Notes, Permit Note, and Tree Protection Notes on the landscape plans, which are available through the City Forester. Comment Number: 3 3/26/2018: Continued: Comment Originated: 05/26/2017 Is it possible to transplant the tree near the two existing conifers (Engleman Spruce and Ponderosa Pine)? If not, then City Forestry will explore possibilities of transplanting the Colorado Blue Spruce off-site. Will advise with final decision. 10/23/2017: Continued: 05/26/2017: - At the onsite meeting, evaluation of the feasibility of transplanting the spruce closes to Vine can be determined. - It also appears grading may impact two evergreens in the detention pond. - Existing spruce along Shields appears to be further to the west. Please adjust this on the landscape plans. Comment Number: 5 3/26/2018: Continued: Comment Originated: 05/26/2017 Thank you for providing proper tree-utility separation throughout the site. There is a gas line that runs through the right-of-way that is of concern to the street trees. I contacted Marc Virata in Engineering to clarify if this gas line is proposed or existing as well as the tree separation distance required. 10/23/2017: Continued: 05/26/2017: Review locations of water and sewer service lines and provide at least 6� separation between trees. Please clearly label the utilities on the landscape plans. 3 Comment Number: 6 �omment Originated: 05/26/2017 3/26/2018: Continued: Please show irrigated turf in the right-of-way with a distinct symbol on the landscape plan sheet SP 3.1. Identifying irrigated turf with a unique symbol, such as the hatch on SP 3.3, is helpful to show on the landscape plans. 10/23/2017: Please show irrigated turf in the right-of-way with a distinct symbol. 5/26/2017: Please clarify where irrigated turf is to be used on the project. The current symbol is difficult to see. Please note that irrigated turf must be used in the right-of-way. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/26/2017 3/26/2018: Continued: Thank you for using Kentucky Coffeetree in place of Honeylocust and making several changes. City Forestry does not advise planting Black Walnut because they are susceptible to Thousand Cankers Disease. Most Black Walnut trees in the area are in rapid decline from this disease. Please plant additional Catalpa or incorporate Accolade Elm in place of the Black Walnuts. Please indicate Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn (Crategus crusgalli `Inermis') in the plant schedule. 10/23/2017: All comments from 5/26/2017 still apply in regards to species selection. City Forestry would like the applicant to consider the use of Kentucky Coffeetree "Espresso" in place of the proposed Honeylocust on the project. We are reaching a maximum species diversity of Honeylocust in Fort Collins and would like to begin incorporating alternative species in their place. 05/26/2017: Tree Selection - Please replace American Linden with Kentucky Coffeetree or Catalpa. - Amur Chokecherry has poor survivability in Fort Collins. City Forestry has experienced earty decline and sun scalding that usually results with premature removal/replacement. Forestry recommends using Gamble Oak in the dryland detention area and possibly Red Barron Crabapple for the two Chokecherry close to the Gas-O-Mat. - The conifers shown between the walk on Vine are close to the proposed street trees. This area will be heavily shaded as the street trees grow and mature. - Forestry recommends changing Limber Pine to either Rocky Mountain Juniper or Blue Spruce. 4 � • - The two proposed pinyon pines and limber pines in the section along Shields on the west side of the building will not thrive due to heavy shading overtime as canopy shade trees mature. Please evaluate changing to a more shade tolerant species, such as Colorado Blue Spruce, and adding a couple more trees in this area. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 3/26/2018: Continued: The symbols are still a little unclear. To clarify which trees are existing on the landscape plans (sheet SP3.1), please say "EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN" followed by the species abbreviation. Omit displaying mitigation values for these existing trees as they will not require any mitigation. In the landscape schedule, please do not include existing trees because it might confuse the landscape contractor about the number of trees they are to purchase/plant on-site. Because you show the existing trees to remain on SP3.4 in the tree inventory table, this information is already provided and does not need to be shown in the plant schedule. 10/23/2017: Please use a distinct symbol for existing trees on-site and trees to remain. This symbol should differ from new plantings. City Forestry suggests using a lighter shade for the symbol to increase distinction between existing and proposed landscaping. Comment Number: 10 3/26/2018: Continued: Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 Thank you for showing mitigation trees with a M. However, I only counted 22 mitigation trees. There is one existing tree labeled as mitigation tree, but unfortunately, this will not count towards your total required mitigation number. Please add one more mitigation tree to the plan and update the landscape schedule accordingly. 10/23/2017: In place of "X" and for additional clarity, please label all mitigation trees with a bolded and capitalized "M" on both the landscape plans and landscape schedule. Comment Number: 11 3/26/2018: Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 Continued: Thank you for providing the Minimum Species Diversity percentages in the landscape schedule. Please remove existing trees from the landscape schedule as they should not be included in the new species diversity. In addition, please provide the total plant count for each category. For example, there are 24 deciduous trees, 23 ornamental trees, and 23 coniferous. The species percentage should derive from the total number of trees (70 trees). Since there are greater than 60 trees on-site, no more than 15% of one species shall be planted. Please adjust the species diversity so that calculation uses the total number of trees on-site (70). For example, there are 5 Kentucky Coffeetree 5 proposed out of�total trees. equals � 7%. The diversity percentage for Ke�ucky Coffeetree 10/23/2017: Please include Minimum Species Diversity percentages in the landscape schedule. See Land Use Code 3.2.1. Comment Number: 12 3/26/2018: Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 Please show the full inventory and mitigation table (that is shown on SP3.4) on sheet SP2.3 as well. Comment Number: 13 3/26/2018: Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 The street tree placement along Vine appears to be less than 30 feet in some areas. The required distance between street trees is 30-40 feet. Please adjust spacing to meet. In addition, the Cottonwoods are spaced at 20 feet. These are very large maturing shade trees that should be spaced, at minimum, 30 feet apart to allow for proper growth. Comment Number: 14 3/26/2018: Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 Please show all City of Fort Collins landscape notes on one sheet. In addition, please show the City Street Tree Permit note on all landscape sheets to emphasize importance. This note is available from City Forestry. Comment Number: 15 03/26/2018: 3/26/2016: Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 There appears to be one extra Syringa Reticulata on the landscape plans. Only 4 are specified in the plant schedule. Please correct. Department: Light And Power Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tsieqmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: Light and Power has electric facilities along the south side of Vine Dr. that, with modifications to our primary system, can be utilized to provide power to the site. Modifications will include trenching or boring new primary line under Vine Dr and installing a new vault. Light and Power also has conduit stubbed along the east side of Shields St, adjacent to the site that could be utilized to provide power into the site. Further discussions are necessary to determine where the power feed into the site will come from. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development. Please contact me or visit the following website for an estimate of charges and fees: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investmen t-development-fees 0 • Comment Number: 3 � Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: Transformer locations will need to be coordinated with Light & Power. Transformer must be placed within 10 ft of a drivable surface for installation and maintenance purposes. The transformer must also have a front clearance of 10 ft and side/rear clearance of 3 ft minimum. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one line diagram for the commercial meter will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering. A link to the C-1 form is below: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development- forms-guidelines-regulations Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: Electric meter locations will need to be coordinated with Light and Power. Please show proposed meter locations on the utility and site plans. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: Please contact Tyler Siegmund at Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970.416.2772. Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Mark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtaylor@fcgov.com Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 03/26/2018: Repeat Comment. An agreement still needs to be finalized before storm drainage outfall is allowed into the ditch. The ditch company will not proceed with agreement preparation or review until all permit application fees have been paid. 10/23/2017: An Discharge Agreement between the owner and the Arthur Irrigation Company will be required before storm water can be discharged into the irrigation ditch. Please contact Rosanna Harris, 730 Ash Mesa Road, Delta, Colorado 81416; rosannharris@gmail.com; 1.970.874.0189 to start working on the agreement. This agreement must be in place before any work can begin on the project. Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 03/26/2018: Repeat Comment. Their have been problems in the past with unauthorized requests for work being charged to the ditch company, so the attorney will not proceed with out notification from the ditch company. If the applicant is having problems, they can call the ditch company president at 970.416.2494 and ask him to call the attorney and instruct him to proceed. 10/23/2017: An easement granted to Arthur Irrigation Company from the property owner will be required before plan approval. Please contact the Arthur attorney, Brent Bartlett (Fisher Brown Bartlett & Gunn), 1319 E Prospect Road, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525; 970.407.9000 to begin the easement process. Department: PFA � Contact: Andrew Rosen, , arosen@fcqov.com Comment Number: 1 UPDATE 3-26-2018 Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 • Fire Lane sign placement appears to be appropriate as denoted on the Emergency Service Plan dated 2-20-18. PFA may request additional signs or change of placement at time of Final Inspection 05/23/2017: FIRE LANES Fire access is required to within 150' of all exterior portions of any building, or facility as measured by an approved route around the building perimeter. For the purposes of this section, fire access cannot be measured from an arterial road (Shields) and a fire lane will be required on the property. Any fire lane on private property shall be dedicated as an Emergency Access Easement (EAE) and be labeled as such on future plans. The existing hammerhead easement currently indicated for the cell tower is not labeled as an Emergency Access Easement. Dedication of an EAE for cell tower access was required to be dedicated in conjunction with construction of the cell tower. As it relates to the overall site plan, this easement does not provide access to the entire site as defined by code. An Emergency Access Easement will need to be updates so as to serve the entire facility and be dedicated with the replat. Code language provided below. > IFC 503.1.1: Approved fire Lanes shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. When any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access, the fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension if the building is equipped throughout with an approved, automatic fire-sprinkler system. Department: Planning Services Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard@fcgov.com Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 03/30/2018 03/30/2018: In order to be scheduled for an Administrative Hearing, a Letter of Intent is needed from the Arthur Irrigation Company. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 03/30/2018 03/30/2018: After obtaining a street light layout from Light and Power, be sure that shade trees are kept at least 40 feet from such lights but in order to not have an 80-foot gap, ornamental trees may be placed to within 15-feet of street lights. 0 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmoqen@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 • Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: I understand that the ditch company has been less responsive than desirable; however, this letter of intent still must be provided prior to hearing and completed agreement prior to final plan approval. 10/27/2017: Comment still applies. Please provide letter of intent prior to hearing and agreement prior to final plan approval. 05/23/2017: An agreement is required in order to have this site outfall to Arthur's Ditch. Please contact Mark Taylor at 970-416-2494 to coordinate. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Repeat comment. Nothing was seen in this submittal to address this comment. 10/27/2017: It appears the eastern pond will be used to treat and detain these flows. Please show sizing for these flows in the eastern pond. It appears flow from other areas will be treated by rain gardens prior to entering either detention pond; therefore, it is not required to provide water quality for this runoff as it will be treated by the rain gardens. 05/23/2017: It is required that half of the street frontage be brought into the site as it has historically flowed. This flow needs to be both detained and treated for water quality. LID treatment is not required. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Clarification is needed to understand what is being proposed. The plans show 3 rain gardens; however, sizing calculations are only shown for 2 rain gardens. Please hefp me understand what is being proposed; I'm happy to discuss the intent with you and explain what I'm looking for. 10/27/2017: Sizing calculations were not seen. Please provide sizing calculations for the rain gardens to show that adequate space has been provided for the rain garden footprint. 05/23/2017: Please provide sizing calculations for the proposed rain gardens and show that Low Impact Development requirements for the site are being met. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Repeat comment. These issues were not clarified in this submittal. 10/27/2017: Please see redlines regarding water quality calculations and details in the drainage report. 05/23/2017: Please review the water quality calculations per the redlines. Do the proposed detention basins have a permanent water surface? Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Repeat comment. This submittal did not address these questions. 10/27/2017: Please expand discussion of water quality and low impact development requirements. It is noted that the majority of the site will be treated with the proposed rain gardens and areas that are not treated by the rain gardens will have extended detention water quality provided and sized in the proposed detention basins. No discussion of off-site flows was seen. Please address. 0 05/23/2017: Ple• update the drainage report to include thor• h discussion of the drainage design including, but not limited to: - 4-step process - Off-site flows - Water quality and detention - Low Impact Development (LID) Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Repeat comment. I will look to see that the proposed easements are sufficient once the rain gardens, detention ponds and outfalls have been clarified. 10/27/2017: I see that these have been shown and will look to see that they cover the proposed areas in the updated plans next round. 05/23/2017: Please provide easements for the rain gardens, detention basins, and outfalis. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Once again, although the response letter said compliance was shown, it was not seen. Repeat comment. 10/27/2017: Although the response letter said compliance was shown, it was not seen. Repeat comment. 05/23/2017: Please provide evidence that the detention basin is in compliance with drain times per Colorado Revised Statute 37-92-602(8). More information on this statute is available at http://tinyurl.com/RevisedStatuteMemo, and a spreadsheet to show compliance is available for download at http://tinyurl.com/ComplianceSpreadsheet. Please contact Dan Mogen at (970)224-6192 or dmogen@fcgov.com with any questions about this requirement or for assistance with the spreadsheet. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Please see updated redlines provided via pdf. 10/27/2017: Please see updated redlines provided via pdf. 05/23/2017: Please see redlined plans (pdf) and report (hard copy). Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Comment still applies. 10/27/2017: Comment still applies. 05/23/2017: Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming upon future submittals as additional details are discovered. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 03/26/2018: Please contact me to discuss proposed landscaping for the rain gardens prior to final plan. I would like to discuss what is proposed with the goal of making these rain gardens as successful as possible. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 03/26/2018: The majority of my comments and redlines from Rounds 1 and 2 reviews still have not been addressed. This submittal is largely a duplication of what I received in October 2017 and has not been updated in many areas that require updates. Overall, I consider this submittal to be incomplete as it has not addressed comments and redlines that were previously provided. yo Contact: Jesse Schlam, 9�218-2932, Ischlam@fcqov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 � Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/16/2018: Please resubmit an Erosion Control Plans as the recently received materials have comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation as the recently received materials has comments and redlines, that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria and as a result have changed the Erosion Control Plans and would require a recalculation of the Escrow. If you need clarification concerning the Erosion Control Material Requirements or Comments presented above please contact myself. Jesse Schlam (970) 224-6015 jschlam@fcgov.com 10/16/2017: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft. and therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. a copy of the erosion control requirements can be found at www.fcgov.com/eroison. The Erosion Control Materials will need to be submitted at time of the first round of FDP. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Plans as the recently received materials have comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Report as the recently received materials has comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation as the recently received materials has comments and redlines, that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria and as a result have changed the Erosion Control Plans and would require a recalculation of the Escrow. Based upon the area of disturbance, State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre and should be pulled before Construction Activities begin. If you need clarification concerning the Erosion Control Material Requirements or Comments presented above please contact myself. Jesse Schlam (970) 224-6015 jschlam@fcgov.com 05/23/2017: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft., therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan (Based upon returned redlines), an Erosion Control Report (based off of Erosion Control Criteria), and an Escrow / Security Calculation. Also, based upon the area of disturbance State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 19 03/26/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 �� 05/31/2017: The�e are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 20 03/26/2018: There are spelling issues. See redlines. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: There are spelling issues. See redlines. Topic: Construction Drawings • Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 03/26/2018: Please remove the address from the title blocks. With the project being replatted, the address could change. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Please remove the address from the title. With the project being replatted, the address could change. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 03/26/2018: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 03/26/2018: Please make changes to the Benchmark Statement as shown. See redlines. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Please make changes to the Benchmark Statement as shown. See redlines. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 03/26/2018: The legal description is not necessary. The sub-title serves as the legal description. If it is going to remain, it needs to be corrected. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: The legal description is not necessary. The sub-title serves as the legal description. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 03/26/2018: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. Comment Number: 27 03/26/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: General Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 03/26/2018: EMERGENCY SERVICE PLAN: There are line over te� issues. See redlines. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Emergency Service Plan: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 12 ,• • Comment Number: 31 • Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 03/26/2018: EMERGENCY SERVICE PLAN: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 11 03/26/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Plat Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/26/2018: We were aware of the passing of Mr. Lewis, and understand that no revised Plat was submitted. We have included our redlines from the 10/25/17 review for the new Surveyor. 10/26/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. 05/30/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated 03/26/2018: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/30/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 03/26/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 05/30/2017 05/30/2017 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 03/26/2018: Some of the boundary information, and right of way & easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 03/26/2018: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 30 03/26/2018: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Comment Originated: 03/26/2018 13 De artment: Traffic 0 eratior p p Contact: Martina Wilkinson, Comment Number: 2 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 • 10/20/2017: The frontage improvements shown don't seem to tie into the roundabout approach. A bike lane is needed, which is funneled into a ramp with striping that shows the bike lane ending. We're checking with our engineering department to see if that approach had a concept design completed that we can provide. 05/23/2017: The development will need frontage improvements along Vine Drive including sidewalk. Contact: Tim Tuttle, , TTUTTLE@fcgov.com Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/27/2018 03/27/2018: Signing and striping redlines will be provided at the staff review meeting. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/22/2017 05/22/2017: A landscape plan shall contain accurate and identifiable hydrozones, including a water budget chart that shows the total annual water use, which shall not exceed fifteen (15) gallons per square foot over the site. If you have questions contact Eric Olson at eolson@fcgov.com or 970-221-6704. � Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/22/2017 05/22/2017: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmoqen@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Repeat comment - please show this on the utility plan. I see new services to the "dwelling unit with home occupation." Please call out as such to allow for one water and wastewater service to the building. 10/27/2017: I see new services to the "dwelling unit with home occupation." Please call out as such to allow for one water and wastewater service to the building. Please see redlines and clarify proposed services to both buildings including providing adequate slope for the proposed sewer services, which is 2% minimum for a 4" sanitary service. 05/23/2017: It appears that the existing water and sewer services to the site will be utilized to provide services to the proposed buildings and no new building services are proposed. � 14 �• Comment Numbe'r: 2 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Comment left active, no response required. 10/27/2017: Noted per response, this hydrant will be private. (This comment is left active to transfer documentation to final plan - no response required.) 05/23/2017: The proposed fire hydrant, as currently shown, will be considered private. A public hydrant would be considered if the hydrant is within 150' of the roadway and access is provided via a curb cut with access drive. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 03/26/2018: Repeat comment. Once again, the majority of redlines have not been addressed. Overall, I consider this submittal to be incomplete as it has not addressed comments and redlines that were previously provided. 10/27/2017: The majority of redlines from round 1 were not addressed. Please see updated redlines and provide response with next submittal. Please feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss anything shown in the redlines. 05/23/2017: Please see redlined plans (pdf). Comment Number: 5 03/26/2018: Comment still applies. Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 10/27/2017: Comment still applies. 05/23/2017: Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming upon future submittals as additional details are discovered. Department: Zoning Contact: Ryan Boehle, 970-416-2401, rboehle@fcqov.com Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/24/2017 03/28/18: A note needs to be added to the site plan explaining trash service. 05/23/2017: - How will the development handle refuse? Will a trash enclosure be provided for this storage facility? If an enclosure is provided it will need to be adequately sized and conveniently located. The enclosure will also need to have a separate pedestrian access for ease of use as per 3.2.5. 10/24/2017 : I see the shaded area of a private trash area but I need an elevation or a change to the site plan showing how the trash area will operate. 15